1. Are Internal Fragments Observable in Electron Based Top-Down Mass Spectrometry?
- Author
-
Mikawy NN, Rojas Ramírez C, DeFiglia SA, Szot CW, Le J, Lantz C, Wei B, Zenaidee MA, Blakney GT, Nesvizhskii AI, Loo JA, Ruotolo BT, Shabanowitz J, Anderson LC, and Håkansson K
- Subjects
- Amino Acid Sequence, Software, Chromatography, Liquid, Proteins chemistry, Peptide Fragments chemistry, Mass Spectrometry methods, Fourier Analysis, Tandem Mass Spectrometry methods, Electrons
- Abstract
Protein tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) often generates sequence-informative fragments from backbone bond cleavages near the termini. This lack of fragmentation in the protein interior is particularly apparent in native top-down mass spectrometry (MS). Improved sequence coverage, critical for reliable annotation of posttranslational modifications and sequence variants, may be obtained from internal fragments generated by multiple backbone cleavage events. However, internal fragment assignments can be error prone due to isomeric/isobaric fragments from different parts of a protein sequence. Also, internal fragment generation propensity depends on the chosen MS/MS activation strategy. Here, we examine internal fragment formation in electron capture dissociation (ECD) and electron transfer dissociation (ETD) following native and denaturing MS, as well as LC/MS of several proteins. Experiments were undertaken on multiple instruments, including quadrupole time-of-flight, Orbitrap, and high-field Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) across four laboratories. ECD was performed at both ultrahigh vacuum and at similar pressure to ETD conditions. Two complementary software packages were used for data analysis. When feasible, ETD-higher energy collision dissociation MS
3 was performed to validate/refute potential internal fragment assignments, including differentiating MS3 fragmentation behavior of radical versus even-electron primary fragments. We show that, under typical operating conditions, internal fragments cannot be confidently assigned in ECD or ETD. On the other hand, such fragments, along with some b-type terminal fragments (not typically observed in ECD/ETD spectra) appear at atypical ECD operating conditions, suggesting they originate from a separate ion-electron activation process. Furthermore, atypical fragment ion types, e.g., x ions, are observed at such conditions as well as upon EThcD, presumably due to vibrational activation of radical z-type ions., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF