Search

Introduction: In recent years, most molecular target drugs have been administered orally, as prescribed at ambulatory services in hospitals and at patients' homes. Telephone follow-up is increasingly being used in clinical practice for patients needing additional support post-discharge and for the prevention of hospital readmissions. The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical benefits of telephone follow-up while administering oral anticancer drugs. Methods: This was a single-center, observational, retrospective study. We evaluated hepatocellular carcinoma patients who received sorafenib or lenvatinib between March 2010 and February 2018. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events. Results: From the total of 130 patients, 83 patients received telephone follow-up and 47 did not. The incidence of hand–foot skin reactions significantly reduced in patients with telephone follow-up (odds ratio (OR) 3.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16–11.8, p = 0.020). The median durations (ranges) of adherence to oral chemotherapy were 259 days (15−1730) for the telephone follow-up group and 121 days (14−1105) for the no-telephone follow-up group (p < 0.001). Moreover, the disease control rate was significantly higher in the telephone follow-up group (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.15–5.53, p = 0.020). Conclusions: Remote interventions, such as telephone follow-up, are useful means of managing adverse events in patients receiving oral anticancer drugs and can lead to improved treatment results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Regorafenib is an oral protein kinase inhinitor approved fot the treatment of metastatic colorecral cancer. We present a first successful case of desensitization in regorafenib-related fix-drug eruption in the literature. Case report: A 44-year-old female patient was diagnosed with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. The patient received regorafenib treatment for malignancy recurrence. The patient was admitted to adult allergy clinic with developing recurrent fix drug eruption in the second cycle, on the 10th day of regorafenib treatment. The patient was given the third cycle of regorafenib treatment with a 6-day desensitization protocol, the first day of which consisted of 6 steps and and the third cycle was successfully completed. Management and outcome: Regorafenib-mediated delayed hypersensitivity reactions occur less frequently and and regorafenib hypersensitivity reactions are difficult to manage and experience is limited. This is the first successful desensitization protocol developed by us for regorafenib-related fix drug eruption and more cases are needed to be reported to confirm the desensitization protocol. Discussion: There is only one successful regorafenib desensitization protocol for severe delayed hypersensivity reaction in the literature, but there is no protocol developed for mild type delayed hypersensivity reaction. The management of fix-drug eruption primarily involves discontinuation and avoidance of the offending drug but our patient had a mild delayed-type reaction and there was no alternative to regarofenib treatment. We developed the rapid 6-step desensitization protocol (Day 1). According to this protocol, the patient was able to continue regorafenib treatment successfully. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dermatological disorders are frequently seen in an emergency care setting. Data suggest that up to 8% of emergency department cases are dermatology-related and may or may not be life-threatening.1 This review focuses on non-IgEmediated life-threatening mucocutaneous hypersensitivity reactions. Dermatology emergencies that involve severe or life-threatening disease include Steven-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), a drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), which are collectively referred to as severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). Erythroderma is also discussed in this review article as it represents skin failure that requires prompt management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Fixed drug eruption and Rowell syndrome stand as intriguing entities with overlapping clinical and pathological features. Case Presentation. A 32-year-old female patient presented with a tender and pruritic rash on the left upper chest for 3 days. Clinical examination revealed a flaring rash on the chest, under her left eye, tongue, and lips. The patient had a significant past medical history of systemic lupus erythematous with positive (ANA, Sm, dsDNA, ribosomalP, RNP) antibodies, hypocomplementemia, inflammatory arthritis, discoid lupus, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and immune thrombocytopenic purpura, and avascular necrosis affecting both hips and her right knee. At the time of presentation, the patient was on azathioprine 150 mg daily and hydroxychloroquine 200 mg twice daily. Skin biopsy of the left upper chest revealed interface dermatitis with necrotic keratinocytes at the dermal-epidermal junction. Superficial and, in some areas, deep perivascular and peri adnexal lymphocytic infiltrates were observed, accompanied by eosinophils. CD123 staining highlighted 16% of the inflammatory cells. Direct Immunofluorescence for IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, and fibrinogen revealed positive linear basement membrane staining for IgG and fibrinogen, with no significant staining for the remaining immunoreactants. Considering the patient's history of medicine usage, and negative SS-A and SS-B antibody, a fixed drug eruption was favored. Discussion. This article discusses the clinical presentations, pathophysiological mechanisms, and diagnostic criteria for fixed drug eruption and Rowell syndrome. Conclusion. Awareness of the distinct clinical and histopathologic features of fixed drug eruption and Rowell syndrome, particularly when sharing cutaneous manifestations, underscores the importance of a comprehensive diagnostic approach and laboratory testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The diversity of skin diseases in patients with malignancies leads to diagnostic difficulties and complicate cancer treatment. Furthermore, the increasing use of chemotherapy drugs and novel treatment regimens raises the risk of the development of various cutaneous side effects and the need for dermatologists during cancer management. We investigated the skin diseases in patients with malignancies and the cutaneous side effects of cancer treatments. Methods: Medical records of cancer patients evaluated in the Dermatology clinic between July 2018 and April 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: This study included 872 cancer patients, 374 females and 498 males. Acute myeloid leukaemia was the most common malignancy, followed by multiple myeloma and invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Graft versus host disease was observed in 89 (10.2%) patients after stem cell transplantation and radiodermatitis developed in 16 (1.8%) patients. Maculopapular drug eruption and hand foot syndrome were the most common cutaneous side effects of chemotherapy drugs. Capecitabine was the most common etiologic agent in hand foot syndrome. Cellulitis was the most frequent bacterial infection in cancer patients, whereas herpes zoster was the most frequent viral infection. Among the chemotherapy drugs that caused acneiform drug eruption, cetuximab and cytarabine were notable. Facial erythema was associated with cytarabine use in 27.3% of patients. Conclusion: Identifying the common skin diseases in cancer patients and cutaneous side effects due to chemotherapy drugs may help to take preventive measures, develop specific and effective treatments, determine the most appropriate cancer treatment options, and increase patients' compliance with cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The clinical application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly improved the prognosis of liver cancer patients. However, drug eruption associated with ICI monotherapy or combination therapy not only impacts the quality of life and treatment progress of liver cancer patients but also poses a potential threat to their lives. The study aims to investigate the risk factors of drug eruption in liver cancer patients undergoing ICIs in real-world settings. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from liver cancer patients who underwent ICI therapies at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between 2021 and 2022. A propensity score matching (PSM) method was employed to match 31 liver cancer patients with ICI-related drug eruption (drug eruption group) to 228 liver cancer patients without immune-related adverse reactions (control group) in a 1:2 ratio, creating two groups of patients with comparable baseline characteristics. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was then conducted to analyze the clinical risk factors associated with drug eruption caused by ICIs. Results: Before PSM, there were statistically significant differences between the drug eruption group (31 cases) and the control group (228 cases) in two variables: Child-Pugh liver function classification and presence of vascular invasion (both p < 0.05). However, after PSM, no statistically significant differences were found in the clinical variables between the drug eruption group (28 cases) and the control group (52 cases). Univariate analysis revealed significantly higher levels of aspartate amino-transferase, alanine aminotransferase, glutamyl transpeptidase, and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and a significantly lower rate of liver cancer resection surgery before immunotherapy in liver cancer patients with drug eruption compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that an elevated SII level before immunotherapy was significantly associated with the occurrence of drug eruption in liver cancer patients treated with ICIs (p < 0.05). The predictive performance of SII before immunotherapy in liver cancer patients for ICI-related drug eruption yielded an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.852, with a critical value of 749.189. Sensitivity and specificity were determined as 85.7% and 75%, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Elevated systemic immune-inflammation index is identified as a risk factor for drug eruption occurrence in liver cancer patients treated with ICI therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the use of narrow-band UVB (NBUVB) phototherapy in treating cutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). A retrospective analysis of patients receiving ICI therapy at two medical centers showed that NBUVB was effective in managing various irAEs, such as eczematous dermatitis, psoriasis, lichen planus, and bullous pemphigoid. The study suggests that NBUVB can be safely combined with other treatments for ICI-induced irAEs without compromising cancer treatment outcomes, highlighting its potential as an adjunctive therapy for managing these adverse events. [Extracted from the article]

ABSTRACT: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the prototype of an autoimmune disease with various manifestations in the skin and several other organs. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus may present with annular and psoriasiform lesions. There have been case reports of pustular lesions in SLE. Herein, we describe a known case of SLE, who developed pustular and crusted lesions which complicated the course of the disease. We considered Acute Generalised Exanthematous Pustulosis, Subcorneal Pustular Dermatosis, Pustular Psoriasis, Pustular Vasculitis, and Pustular Folliculitis as our initial differential diagnosis. A potassium hydroxide mount from crusted lesions showed scabies mites. With these findings, a diagnosis of SLE complicated with crusted scabies was made. She was managed with multiple systemic immunosuppressant and antiscabetic measures following which clinical improvement was seen with remission of her lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Cutaneous irAEs are some of the most reported adverse reactions to ICIs. This prospective monocentric study seeks to offer a comprehensive overview of the skin toxicity associated with these therapies in a single-center institution, with the aim of describing their incidence and our approach for management. Additionally, we aim to highlight the importance of dermatological assessment for affected patients, as it can have a major impact on both their quality of life and the decision to continue treatment. Background/Objectives: The landscape of advanced melanoma treatments has shifted dramatically in recent years. Target therapy and immunotherapy have changed the management of patients with both metastatic (stage IV according to AJCC 8th ed.) and nodal (stage IIB/C and III) disease. As the use of novel agents has increased, so have the cutaneous toxicities associated with these medications. While most skin reactions are low-grade and can be managed conservatively with topical therapies, high-grade or life-threatening drug reactions can arise during therapy, requiring prompt dermatologic recognition and treatment. Given the survival benefit attributed to these new agents, treating skin toxicity and maintaining a patient's quality of life is of paramount importance. Methods: We undertook a prospective, monocentric, and descriptive study in Bologna, Italy, including patients referred to the Oncologic Dermatology Unit of IRCCS AOU of Bologna who developed biopsy-proven cutaneous adverse events (AE) under treatment with immunotherapy for cutaneous melanoma with nodal (stage IIB/C, III) and metastatic (stage IV) disease from January 2016 to April 2024. Results: In 202 identified patients, 75 (37.5%) developed skin AEs. Ipilimumab was causal for 48.1% of skin AEs, followed by nivolumab (37%) and pembrolizumab (31.4%). Recorded types of skin AEs included erythematous rash, vitiligo, alopecia, lichenoid, maculopapular, acneiform, urticarial, psoriasiform, granulomatous, eczematous, and severe cutaneous AEs, such as Erythema multiforme/Stevens-Johnson syndrome and bullous autoimmune dermatoses. Most AEs were low-grade [CTCAE 1–2] (97%) and typically occurred after 10 weeks of treatment. Conclusions: This study comprehensively describes skin AEs occurring during systemic treatment with ICIs for cutaneous melanoma at a single center. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare, usually drug‐induced, acute pustular rash. Despite the lack of strong data supporting the effectiveness of topical or systemic corticosteroids in this drug reaction, they are widely used. More generally, there is no consensus on the diagnostic modalities and the management of patients with AGEP. We aimed to provide European expert recommendations for the diagnosis and management or patients with AGEP. Members of the ToxiTEN group of the European Reference Network (ERN)‐skin, all dermatologists and/or allergologists with expertise in drug reactions, elaborated these recommendations based on their own experience and on a review of the literature. Recommendations were separated into the following categories: professionals involved, assessment of the diagnosis of AGEP, management of the patient and allergological work‐up after the acute phase. Consensus was obtained among experts for the list of professionals involved for the diagnosis and management of AGEP, including the minimum diagnostic work‐up, the setting of management, the treatments, the modalities and the timing of allergological work‐up and follow‐up. European experts in drug allergies propose herein consensus on the diagnosis and management of patients with AGEP. A multidisciplinary approach is warranted, including dermatologists, allergologists and pharmacovigilance services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In dermatology, lichenoid describes lesions with a violaceous hue that is a clinical reflection of basal cell damage in the epithelium and dense mononuclear infiltrate in the sub‐epithelium. The violaceous color results from pigment incontinence due to basal cell damage and the Tyndall effect. Although classically described in lichen planus, a lichenoid hue is noted in the oral mucosa in several other disorders that often lead to diagnostic dilemmas. Early and accurate diagnosis is important for the appropriate management of the underlying condition and prognostication. Dermatologists play a central role in managing such patients since, apart from the oral mucosa findings, the cutaneous features also help to significantly differentiate various conditions. Mimickers of oral lichen planus include nicotine stomatitis, oral submucous fibrosis, oral lichenoid lesions, mucosal discoid lupus erythematosus, pemphigus vulgaris, paraneoplastic pemphigus, mucous membrane pemphigoid, fixed drug eruption, plasma cell cheilitis/gingivitis, and erythema multiforme. While a detailed history and clinical examination can help reach a diagnosis in most cases, histopathology, immunofluorescence, and other relevant investigations help establish the diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pityriasis rosea is an acute, self‐limited exanthem that typically occurs in adolescence and young adulthood, classically featuring ovoid erythematous and scaly lesions on the trunk and proximal extremities. While its cause is not definitively known, the classic form of pityriasis rosea may result from the reactivation of latent human herpesvirus (HHV) infections (HHV‐6 and HHV‐7). Interestingly, drug eruptions that clinically and/or histopathologically resemble pityriasis rosea have also been reported. These pityriasis rosea‐like drug eruptions tend to occur at an older age and have a shorter duration than the classic type. As there are different management paradigms, the distinction between classic pityriasis rosea and the mimicking drug eruption is important to recognize. Herein, we report a case of a pityriasis rosea‐like drug eruption that occurred in association with imatinib mesylate treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. We also review the clinicopathologic features of reported cases of pityriasis rosea‐like drug eruption, including those due to imatinib. While the clinical morphology of the cutaneous drug‐related eruption mimics the lesions seen in classic pityriasis rosea, the presence of unique histopathologic findings, including necrotic keratinocytes, interface dermatitis, and eosinophils, may aid in distinction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enfortumab vedotin (EV), a nectin‐4‐binding agent that affects microtubules, has become standard therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. The agent, now given in combination with pembrolizumab, frequently induces cutaneous reactions. Here, we report a severe EV‐induced cutaneous eruption. A 58‐year‐old woman with metastatic urothelial carcinoma developed a rash after receiving simultaneous first doses of EV and pembrolizumab. The eruption began on the flank and spread to involve her trunk and extremities with prominent involvement of folds, including the axillae and medial thighs. Skin biopsy revealed extensive vacuolar alteration of the basal epidermis and numerous epidermal keratinocytic mitotic figures, often suprabasilar, including ring and "starburst" forms. The findings supported a diagnosis of EV‐induced eruption. With EV cessation and systemic corticosteroids, the rash resolved over a few weeks. Pembrolizumab was restarted as monotherapy, and the patient's cancer showed a significant radiographic treatment response at 3 months. An emerging literature of small series and case reports, largely from oncologic literature, presents the histopathology of EV‐induced cutaneous eruption as a vacuolar interface dermatitis with the inconsistently reported feature of arrested mitotic figures. This case study demonstrates distinctive clinical and histopathologic features of EV‐induced eruption, which may inform dermatologic and oncologic management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Objective: HSG was performed to determine tubal patency of nulliparous and primiparous patients without contraception who underwent a pregnancy program. The contrast used can cause allergies, although the incidence of post-HSG allergy is rare. The clinicians need to be aware of this to remain vigilant. Case Presentation: The Presented case is report of a patient P1A0 who had an allergy after HSG. Hysterosalpingography was performed as the patient wanted another pregnancy, after a long wait without contraception, while the first child was 12 years old. A P1A0 woman with a 12-year-old first child wanted a second pregnancy, who was diagnosed bronchial asthma without regularly taking asthma medications. The patient received analgesic drugs and underwent an HSG examination on the 10th day of menstruation. Thirty minutes later, she complained of itching that started on the face and spread to the whole body, including the arms and legs. The whole body then appeared to be bumped. An hour later, an asthma attack occurred in the form of short breaths. HSG examination was a routine examination carried out in patients undergoing a pregnancy program. Incidence of allergies after HSG is a rare thing. Thus, this case report needs to be submitted to consider that allergic events such as those in this case report can occur. Conclusion: Allergic reactions after HSG are rare. HSG examination is performed on patients with bronchial asthma, and drug allergy (antalgin) must be noted carefully. The two allergy risk factors can trigger an allergic reaction to the contrast used during HSG examination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cutaneous metastases from clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRC) are uncommon and often indicate a poor prognosis. These metastases typically occur on the scalp, face, and trunk, and they can be difficult to diagnose due to their resemblance to benign dermatological tumors. We report the case of a 56-year-old patient with a history of ccRC (TNM stage 4) who was referred to our dermatology department with two rapidly enlarging, painful lesions on the left jawline and scalp, which had developed one month and one week earlier, respectively. On examination, the lesions appeared as well-defined, round to oval plaques with a central ulceration and a peripheral red rim, suggestive of an inflammatory appearance. Dermoscopic examination revealed a structureless pink to orange pattern, atypical central vessels, and irregular linear vessels in a corona-like arrangement. Despite the patient's stable oncological treatment for six months, pain management had recently included paracetamol, tramadol, and NSAIDs. The primary presumptive diagnosis was of cutaneous metastasis, considering the patient's history of metastatic ccRC. However, given the recent initiation of new pharmacological agents, the rapid progression of the cutaneous lesions, and their clinical presentation, alternative differential diagnoses were considered, including drug-induced reactions such as erythema multiforme or fixed drug eruption. A biopsy of the facial lesion revealed immunohistochemical positivity for CD10, CAIX, and PAX8, confirming the diagnosis of metastatic ccRC with sarcomatoid differentiation. Unfortunately, despite continued targeted therapies and palliative care, the patient's condition deteriorated rapidly, leading to death two months later. This case highlights the potential for extremely rapidly evolving cutaneous metastases from ccRC and their capacity to occasionally mimic atypical drug eruptions. Additionally, it reaffirms the poor prognosis of such metastases, as evidenced by the patient's death within two months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document presents an algorithm for diagnosing and treating hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). It emphasizes the importance of consulting an allergist for accurate management and potential delabeling of patients with reported allergies to NSAIDs. The algorithm includes updated classifications of NSAID hypersensitivity reactions and outlines diagnostic methods such as drug provocation tests, skin tests, and basophil activation tests. The goal of the algorithm is to assist healthcare professionals in accurately diagnosing and managing NSAID hypersensitivity in patients. The text also discusses changes in the management of NSAID hypersensitivity reactions, including the inclusion of blended reactions in a new category and the delabeling of mild cutaneous reactions through a direct oral two-step test. The importance of clinical history and individualized approaches is emphasized, taking into account regional differences in drug consumption patterns and diagnostic test availability. The study was supported by various institutions and the authors have no conflicts of interest. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR) are linked with side effects involving skin and mucosa. Herein, we present a unique case of oral lichenoid drug eruption (LDE) in a patient treated with osimertinib. Case report: A 75-year-old woman was diagnosed with metastatic EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, and started on osimertinib 80 mg PO daily. At 24 months of therapy, the patient developed a painful, red, and white striated oral lesion involving the left buccal mucosa and the adjacent buccal aspect of gingivae. Biopsy showed oral LDE. Causality assessment between osimertinib and the oral LDE via Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction probability scale revealed a score of 5. Management and outcome: Osimetinib discontinuation was not felt to be in the best interest of the patient. Therefore, diphenhydramine HCL mouthwash every 6 h PRN (before meals) was started. Spicy and hot foods were discontinued. At a four-week follow-up visit, the patient reported moderate improvement in her symptoms. Conclusion: Oral LDEs are considered premalignant lesions as they can transform into squamous cell carcinoma; therefore, regular follow-up is needed. Awareness of this potential side effect of osimertinib would also prevent unnecessary (and potentially costly) work-up and lead to its prompt diagnosis and treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare and severe cutaneous adverse reaction characterized by the abrupt onset of widespread sterile pustules on an erythematous base. This is associated with medications, including antiepileptic drugs, phenytoin, and antibiotics such as beta-lactams and macrolides. This is a rare case where a macrolide antibiotic is reported to induce AGEP in an epileptic patient who was on phenytoin therapy. The patient, at the age of 25, was taking phenytoin for the past two years to subside epileptic symptoms. In this period, he has never reported any complications related to AGEP. Including macrolide antibiotics in his prescription aggravated the symptoms of AGEP within a few days. The primary course of action involved immediate withdrawal of both the drugs i.e. phenytoin and macrolide antibiotic, and symptomatic treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the impact of sulfonamide allergy labels on the risk of opportunistic infections after solid organ transplantation (SOT). SOT recipients with a sulfonamide allergy label were found to have an increased risk of Toxoplasma and Nocardia infections compared to those without the label. The study highlights the importance of reassessing sulfonamide allergy labels in SOT recipients to optimize prophylactic treatment and reduce the risk of opportunistic infections. Efforts should be made to identify safe delabeling strategies and promote the use of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP‐SMX) in eligible SOT recipients. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Exanthematous drug eruption and infectious mononucleosis (IM) are both exanthematous diseases. Current research on exanthematous drug eruption and IM mainly targets identifying these disorders, the resulting differences at the metabolism level have not yet been systematically analyzed. Materials and methods: A total of 30 cases of exanthematous drug eruption and IM, 10 patients without exanthema and 10 healthy volunteers were enrolled, 3 mL of fasting venous blood was collected, the serum metabolite content was detected by gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry metabolomics. Results: A total of 165 metabolites were identified, exhibiting significant differences in plasma metabolic trends between exanthematous drug eruption and IM, and pinpointed 28 potential biomarkers. Notable changes were seen in the metabolic activities of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA‐cycle), and galactose metabolism, characterized by increased levels of gluconate, gluconolactone, glucose, galactaric acid, and mannose, along with decreased amounts of pyruvic acid, succinic acid, malic acid, and glycerol, indicating an impairment in the exanthematous drug eruption group's capacity to endure oxidative stress and regulate energy metabolism. In contrast to its medication without rash counterpart, the exanthematous drug eruption group's plasma displayed distinct metabolic routes, predominantly in the processing of arginine and proline, along with the TCA. This resulted in a marked reduction in urea levels and a rise in pyruvate, citrate, and ornithine, indicating hypoxic stress as the primary cause of these rashes. In contrast to the healthy control group, the IM group showed 26 potential biomarkers, marked by increased levels of ketoglutaric acid, malic acid, pyruvic acid, and oxoglutaric acid, and reduced amounts of glutamine, galacturonic acid, arachidonic acid, trimethylphosphonic acid ester, gluconolactone, and indole acetic acid. Mainly, the metabolic pathways included the TCA, breaking down alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, and the processing of D‐glutamine and D‐glutamate metabolism, underscoring the body's crucial role in generating energy and inflammatory agents through the citric acid cycle. Conclusions: The comparison of serum metabolomic features of exanthematous drug eruptions and IM outlines a unique pattern closely related to the differences in the pathogenesis of these two exanthematous diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aseptic pustulosis involves inflammatory skin conditions with nonbacterial pustules on erythema, accompanied by neutrophil and eosinophil infiltration in the epidermis. Dysregulation of the interleukin (IL)-36 pathway leads to neutrophil aggregation and pustule formation. Variants in IL36RN , CARD14 , AP1S3 , MPO , SERPINA3 and BTN3A3 have been identified in generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) in the past. Some patients with acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau (ACH), palmoplantar pustulosis and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) also exhibit mutations in IL36RN , CARD14 and AP1S3 , albeit with regional and population-specific variations. This study aims to explore a shared genetic foundation among those with aseptic pustulosis. We performed Sanger sequencing on six genes in 126 patients with aseptic pustulosis. Genetic analysis identified IL36RN variants strongly associated with ACH, AGEP and subcorneal pustular dermatosis (SPD). Immunohistochemistry revealed elevated inflammatory cytokines in all subtypes. This study establishes a significant association between IL36RN variants and ACH, AGEP and SPD, emphasizing the IL-1/IL-36–chemokine–neutrophil axis as a common pathogenic mechanism. Targeting this axis holds promise for therapeutic interventions for aseptic pustulosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses Grover's disease (GD) in oncologic patients and provides a systematic review of relevant literature. GD is a skin condition whose pathogenesis is not fully understood, but recent evidence suggests it may involve an overexpression of interleukin 4 (IL-4). The association between GD and malignancies, as well as between GD and systemic oncologic treatments, has been sporadically reported. The review includes 31 patients with GD, with the most strongly associated malignancies being metastatic melanoma and hematologic malignancies. Immunotherapy was the most common observed oncologic treatment. The article also discusses the histological features, comorbidities, and treatment options for GD. [Extracted from the article]

Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as the programmed cell death‐1 (PD‐1) inhibitors, pembrolizumab and nivolumab, are frontline treatments for several types of solid‐organ malignancies. However, cutaneous adverse effects with PD‐1 inhibitor therapy are common and include lichenoid reactions, eczema, vitiligo and bullous dermatoses. Perforating dermatosis is a rare condition characterised by the extrusion of degenerate materials from the upper dermis through the epidermis and has rarely been reported in association with PD‐1 inhibitor therapy. Herein, we report the first case to our knowledge of acquired perforating dermatosis following treatment with pembrolizumab.

This report presents a case of pseudoephedrine-induced non-pigmented bullous fixed drug eruption (NBFDE) manifesting as recurrent palmoplantar exfoliation in a scuba diver. It emphasizes the importance of considering drug allergies in the differential diagnosis when divers present with peeling hands and soles. A 38-year-old female scuba diver experiencing recurrent palmoplantar exfoliation underwent a clinical evaluation, patch testing, an interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay, and graded drug challenges with pseudoephedrine and phenylephrine. Patch testing yielded negative results; however, the ELISpot assay indicated a strong immune response to pseudoephedrine. A graded challenge involving pseudoephedrine successfully reproduced the symptoms, confirming a diagnosis of pseudoephedrine-induced NBFDE. Subsequently, a challenge with phenylephrine elicited a milder reaction, suggesting it as a potential alternative medication for the patient. This case highlights NBFDE as a potential cause of skin peeling in scuba divers who are allergic to pseudoephedrine. It emphasizes the importance of considering drug allergies when diagnosing palmoplantar exfoliation in divers and underscores the need for a thorough evaluation of medication use in this group. Alternative medications and management strategies should be considered for divers with a pseudoephedrine allergy to prevent ear barotrauma while minimizing the risk of adverse skin reactions.

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are closely associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates, prolonged hospitalization durations, and higher healthcare costs. This study aimed to estimate the incidence, clinical features, and reporting status of ADRs to improve the current ADR reporting system and prevent recurrent ADRs in hospitals. This retrospective study was conducted at a regional referral hospital. Patients diagnosed with ADRs over a 5-year period (2009-2014) were recruited for this study. An ADR was identified as an ADRrelated diagnosis in a patient’s medical record or an ADR registered through the inhospital ADR reporting system. The incidence, culprit drug, clinical manifestations, reporting source, severity, related management, and recurrence rate were assessed. Among 1,112 patients, 1,375 ADR events were collected, an estimated 0.06% of the total number of patient visits. Diagnostic contrast agents (46.4%) were the most common culprit drugs, followed by antibiotics (22.0%), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (9.9%), and opioids (4.5%). Skin reactions (67.5%) such as rashes and hives were the most frequent manifestations. Additional ADR-related medical attention was necessary in two thirds of cases. One hundred eighty ADR events (13.1%) were categorized as severe, and 19 patients (1.4%) experienced re-exposure to the culprit drugs. Four patients (0.3%) experienced fatal ADRs. Physicians were the most frequent ADR reporters in the in-hospital ADR reporting system. In conclusion, many ADR events may be overlooked, and re-exposure to causative drugs commonly occurs. Continuous education and maintenance of a reporting system may be important for preventing recurrent ADRs.

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, an infrequent adverse drug reaction, mainly results from drugs. Clinically, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis manifests as a high fever, with skin lesions of small monomorphic subcorneal sterile pustules on an erythematous that presents at 1-4 days after medication exposure. The incidence of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis varies from 3/1, 000, 000 to 5/1, 000, 000, while the mortality rate is typically around 5%. We present a case of a 69-year-old female who developed a diffuse, erythematous, pustular rash over the entire body and exhibited a fever of 38.3°C after 4 days of icotinib therapy. Considering her medication history and the appearance of the lesions, she was diagnosed with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis and received appropriate treatment. We also conducted a literature review through PubMed to compare similarities and differences between our case and those reported in the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Delayed-type drug hypersensitivity reactions are major causes of morbidity and mortality. The origin, phenotype, and function of pathogenic T cells across the spectrum of severity require investigation. We leveraged recent technical advancements to study skin-resident memory T cells (TRMs) versus recruited T cell subsets in the pathogenesis of severe systemic forms of disease, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and skin-limited disease, morbilliform drug eruption (MDE). Microscopy, bulk transcriptional profiling, and single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-Seq) plus cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing (CITESeq) plus T cell receptor sequencing (TCR-Seq) supported clonal expansion and recruitment of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells from circulation into skin along with expanded and nonexpanded cytotoxic CD8+ skin TRM in SJS/TEN. Comparatively, MDE displayed a cytotoxic T cell profile in skin without appreciable expansion and recruitment of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells from circulation, implicating TRMs as potential protagonists in skin-limited disease. Mechanistic interrogation in patients unable to recruit T cells from circulation into skin and in a parallel mouse model supported that skin TRMs were sufficient to mediate MDE. Concomitantly, SJS/TEN displayed a reduced Treg signature compared with MDE. DRESS demonstrated recruitment of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells into skin as in SJS/TEN, yet a pro-Treg signature as in MDE. These findings have important implications for fundamental skin immunology and clinical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive, fibrotic, and fatal lung disease associated with the inevitable loss of lung function. Pirfenidone, which has antifibrotic properties and has been used orally in recent years, slows down the progression of the disease and increases survival rates. However, photosensitive skin rash caused by absorbing ultraviolet rays is the most frequently encountered adverse effect in clinical practice. Methods: Thirteen patients who were treated for IPF in the department of chest diseases between September 2018 and January 2022, used pirfenidone, and applied to the dermatology outpatient clinic due to rash were retrospectively examined. During this period, the number of patients receiving pirfenidone for IPF in chest diseases was fifty-six. Results: In dermatological examination, scaly plaques on an erythematous background were common in seven patients, whereas lichenoid papules and plaques were dominant in six. In the histopathological evaluation of biopsies taken from the lesional skin area, the findings were consistent with superficial perivascular dermatitis in two, psoriasiform dermatitis in five, and lichenoid reaction pattern in six patients. When photosensitivity reactions occurred, pirfenidone treatment was continued in eleven patients at a reduced dose, and only two patients discontinued pirfenidone and switched to nintedanib therapy. Conclusion: We aimed to show that photosensitivity reactions can be managed in the majority of patients without discontinuing pirfenidone, which plays a vital role in the treatment of IPF symptom control and survival by reducing the dose, using sun protection, and taking additional protective measures, and to provide further insight to clinicians in this regard. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gut microbiota dysbiosis has been linked with numerous autoimmune disorders and inflammatory skin pathologies. The present study is a narrative review aiming to examine dysregulations in the gut microbiota of patients with pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid, exploring how these alterations may contribute to diseases' development and/or progression. Significant alterations in the composition of intestinal micro-biota were identified in patients with pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid: reduction in short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria: Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Lachnospiraceae and Coprococcus spp., which are known for their anti-inflammatory effects, and increased abundance of Escherichia coli, Shigella spp., Klebsiella spp., Bacteroides fragilis and Flavonifractor spp., which are recognized for their pro-inflammatory impact. The composition of gut microbiota might influence the pathogenesis of autoimmune bullous diseases. Modified levels of bacteria could become innovative biomarkers for the detection of high-risk individuals, monitoring disease progression and predicting response to treatment. Furthermore, regulating bacterial levels might have therapeutic effects in diminishing inflammation and disease advancement, potentially serving as future therapeutic strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present case series examined five instances of psoriasiform drug eruption diagnosed between 2014 and 2022 at the study site and 23 cases of drug eruption manifesting psoriasiform lesions which had been reported between 1986 and 2022. The causative drug, distribution of the skin eruptions, clinical latency to eruption, treatment course, and histopathological findings were investigated. The most common causative agents were calcium channel blockers (CCB) (64.5%). Of the 28 cases of psoriasiform drug eruption for which details of the eruption sites were reported, 46.4% occurred on the face, which was slightly higher than the usual distribution of psoriasis. CCB were responsible for 80.0% of the cases of facial skin rash. The mean time from the administration of the suspected drug to eruption onset was 25.0 months (range: 0.5–120 months; median: 13.0 months). In all the cases, the skin rash improved after the causative drug was discontinued. CCB were the most common causative agent, and the eruptions more commonly occurred on the face than in normal psoriasis, suggesting that it is especially important to confirm whether there is a history of CCB administration in psoriasis patients with extensive, facial skin eruptions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical effects of COVID-19 infection and vaccines on Myasthenia gravis (MG) during the pandemic. Methods: A total of 141 MG patients between April 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Data including demographic and clinical characteristics of patients, COVID-19 test results, and vaccine types (mRNA-BNT162b2 and/or inactivated-CoronaVac) were recorded. All patients were followed by face-to-face interviews and/or phone calls. Worsening MG symptoms after COVID-19 infection or vaccines were noted. Results: A total of 60 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction test results were COVID-19 positive in 54 (90%) patients. Twenty-eight (46.7%) patients had lung involvement, while 20(33.3%) patients were followed in the ward. Twelve (20%) patients were followed in the intensive care unit, and two of them (3.3%) died. Both deceased patients were unvaccinated. The most common symptoms were fatigue (78.3%), and 13(21.7%) patients were asymptomatic. Of the patients, 96(68%) received at least one dose BNT162b2 or CoronaVac, while 30.4% of the patients received ≥3 doses of vaccines. The local skin irritation and fatigue rate was significantly higher with BNT162b2 vaccine than CoronaVac (p<0.001 and p=0.004, respectively). No serious side effect was observed with either vaccine. Five patients had worsening MG symptoms after vaccination during a six-week follow-up. None of the patients experienced myasthenic crises. Conclusion: Our study results suggest that COVID-19 infection affects MG similar to the general population and does not lead to worsening MG symptoms. Both mRNA and inactivated vaccines with proven efficacy can be used safely in MG patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare but life-threatening skin lesion triggered by hypersensitive drug reaction. They are characterized by extensive epidermal necrosis and skin exfoliation. Fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus (FT1DM) is featured by a rapid-onset of hyperglycemia with ketoacidosis due to severely destroyed β-cell function. Fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus as a sequela of SJS/TEN has rarely been reported. Case presentation: We present a 73-year-old female patient who developed SJS/TEN skin allergic reaction after taking carbamazepine and phenytoin for 35 days. Then, hyperglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis occurred 20 days after discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs. A very low serum C-peptide level (8.79 pmol/l) and a near-normal glycosylated hemoglobin level met the diagnostic criteria for fulminant T1DM. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and insulin were promptly administered, and the patient recovered finally. Conclusions: This rare case indicates that monitoring blood glucose is necessary in SJS/TEN drug reaction, and comprehensive therapy with rehydration, insulin, antibiotics, and IVIG may improve the prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article describes the case of a 79-year old Caucasian man who was treated with donepezil after developing a pruritic erythematous maculopapular eruption at the application site of rivastigmine transdermal patches, which was used to treat his Lewy body disease. The patient's skin lesions did not regress after antihistaminic treatment with cetirizine. A Naranjo scale assessment showed the high probability of the relation of cutaneous adverse effects with rivastigmine transdermal patches.

Apalutamide is a selective androgen receptor signalling inhibitor that is used in the treatment of prostate cancer. Skin rash is one of the most common adverse events with apalutamide. Although the majority of rash events are grade 1 and 2, the appearance of skin rash during treatment can lead to dose reduction, a pause in treatment or even treatment discontinuation, especially if patients present late when the rash has become severe. This in turn can result in a significant delay or even a permanent discontinuation in the patient's treatment of prostate cancer. As apalutamide is a generally well tolerated and an effective treatment for many men with advanced prostate cancer, it is extremely important to make attempts to prevent skin problems or to manage them at the earliest stage possible. We therefore have developed practical guidance for the management of apalutamide-related rash, including an infographic with recommendations for rash management by grade. Central to this approach is patient education and awareness. Encouraging patients to proactively care for their skin from the start of treatment and informing them of the risk of rash with apalutamide therapy are essential. If the patient observes any skin changes, they should be advised to report it straight away to their cancer care team. Adopting this simple, proactive approach of patient education and increased vigilance from the care team is expected to lead to early identification of rash and subsequent intervention to allow for quicker resolution and enable patients to continue their cancer treatment with a drug that can delay disease progression and increase survival in patients with prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the use of dupilumab for treating alopecia areata, an autoimmune skin condition that causes hair loss. Dupilumab, an IL4 and IL13 receptor antagonist, has shown promise in treating various skin conditions, including alopecia areata. While some case reports have demonstrated its effectiveness, further research is needed to understand its mechanism of action and improve targeted therapeutic approaches. The article highlights the psychosocial challenges faced by individuals with alopecia areata and the potential of dupilumab to address both physical symptoms and mental well-being. [Extracted from the article]

Fixed drug eruptions (FDEs) are dermatological manifestations characterized by recurrent lesions at the same site upon re-exposure to the causative drug. We present a novel case of a 32-year-old female who developed bilateral symmetrical erythematous papules on her thighs following the use of chlorzoxazone for chronic back pain. This case is particularly significant as it underscores the potential for this specific drug, which is commonly prescribed, to induce FDE—a reaction previously unreported in the literature. The findings emphasize the necessity for clinicians to maintain a high index of suspicion for drug-induced skin reactions, even with medications considered safe and routinely used. This case serves as a critical reminder of the importance of thorough medication history assessments and the potential implications of drug interactions in dermatological care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Analysing data on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in health facilities is an essential step to help develop effective strategies to reduce their incidence. The objective was to analyse spontaneous ADR reports sent to the Ghanaian Food and Drugs Authority (FDA) by two reporting health facilities over 5 years. Methods: Data from duplicate spontaneous ADR reports sent to the FDA (Ghana) from 2014 to 2018 were extracted. The relationship between independent variables such as age, sex, and source of drugs and ADR outcomes was assessed with either chi‐square or a Cramer's V test for association where appropriate. Results: Type A reactions (65.2%) were the most prevalent of the ADRs, followed by Type B (34.1%), with the majority (80%) of patients affected recovering fully. The majority of Type A reactions (54.1%) occurred in the clinic, while the majority of Type B reactions (43.5%) occurred in the hospital. The skin and central nervous system (CNS) were the most affected (70.8%) organs. A higher incidence of CNS and skin‐related ADRs was recorded in patients older than 30 (RR = 1.28 (1.07–1.53)). Also, females were more likely to experience a CNS‐related ADR. The seriousness of the ADR was found to be significantly associated with the (1) type of prescriber, (2) whether the drug was prescribed, or (3) whether the drug regimen prescribed was appropriate. Even though, in 86% of cases, the offending drug was withdrawn within the first 5 days, it exceeded 20 days in about 6% of cases. The record of allergy status in a patient's folder and the source of the drug were significantly associated with the chance that the offending drug was withdrawn. However, recording ADRs did not influence whether the offending drug was stopped. Conclusion: Most of the ADRs experienced by patients could be avoided if the current systems are improved to prevent the rechallenge of offending drugs. Efforts to improve and update patient medication records and steps to ensure continuity of care are essential in preventing these adverse drug events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common subtype of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Comprehensive analysis of MF cells in situ and ex vivo is complicated by the fact that is challenging to distinguish malignant from reactive T cells with certainty. Methods: To overcome this limitation, we performed combined single-cell RNA (scRNAseq) and T-cell receptor TCR sequencing (scTCRseq) of skin lesions of cutaneous MF lesions from 12 patients. A sufficient quantity of living T cells was obtained from 9 patients, but 2 had to be excluded due to unclear diagnoses (coexisting CLL or revision to a fixed toxic drug eruption). Results: From the remaining patients we established single-cell mRNA expression profiles and the corresponding TCR repertoire of 18,630 T cells. TCR clonality unequivocally identified 13,592 malignant T cells. Reactive T cells of all patients clustered together, while malignant cells of each patient formed a unique cluster expressing genes typical of naive/memory, such as CD27, CCR7 and IL7R, or cytotoxic T cells, e.g., GZMA, NKG7 and GNLY. Genes encoding classic CTCL markers were not detected in all clusters, consistent with the fact that mRNA expression does not correlate linearly with protein expression. Nevertheless, we successfully pinpointed distinctive gene signatures differentiating reactive malignant from malignant T cells: keratins (KRT81, KRT86), galectins (LGALS1, LGALS3) and S100 genes (S100A4, S100A6) being overexpressed in malignant cells. Conclusions: Combined scRNAseq and scTCRseq not only allows unambiguous identification of MF cells, but also revealed marked heterogeneity between and within patients with unexpected functional phenotypes. While the correlation between mRNA and protein abundance was limited with respect to established MF markers, we were able to identify a single-cell gene expression signature that distinguishes malignant from reactive T cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a sudden-onset, severe and rare adverse skin reaction characterized by nonfollicular sterile pustules tending to intertriginous localization. Lesions develop on erythematous and edematous skin. It is often triggered by drugs. This article presents a case diagnosed with AGEP due to etodolac. To the best of our knowledge, this is the second case of AGEP due to etodolac in the literature. A 47-year-old female patient presented with diffuse erythema on the extremities, a purple purpuric rash on the extensor face of both legs, and millimetric pustules on an erythematous base on the inner surface of the left arm. She stated that the reaction developed after taking 3 medications, including etodolac tablets, and gargling the throat with povidone-iodine. The patient was diagnosed with AGEP and her EuroSCAR AGEP Validation Score was calculated as 9 suggesting a definitive diagnosis of AGEP. All of the suspected drugs were discontinued. Methylprednisolone 16 mg/day, a local corticosteroid, and an oral antihistamine were started. Her symptoms resolved and laboratory abnormalities returned to normal within 2 weeks. Patch tests were performed 3 months after the reaction with the suspected drugs. The patch testing showed that only 10% etodolac at 48-, 72- and 96-hour readings were positive (++). The patient was diagnosed with AGEP due to etodolac. AGEP is often secondary reaction to drugs. The most frequent causative drugs are diltiazem, aminopenicillins, pristinamycin, terbinafine, sulphonamides, quinolones, and hydroxychloroquine. AGEP secondary to NSAIDs is very rare. Only one previous case of AGEP due to etodolac was reported in 2011. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Tuberculosis is a communicable illness and one of the leading causes of death, especially in developing countries like Turkey. One of the problems that must be managed well in the treatment of tuberculosis is drug hypersensitivity. The first-line agents are very important for the success of treatment. Alternative drugs are more toxic and less successful in treatment. Therefore, it is very important to be able to include first-line drugs in the post-hypersensitivity regimen. At this point, the success of desensitization comes to the fore. There are fewer studies on rapid drug desensitization in delayed-type drug hypersensitivity to anti-tuberculosis drugs. Aim: The primary aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions in drug-sensitive cases; the secondary aim was to determine the appropriate treatment management. Material and methods: This was a retrospective study. Demographic features, tuberculosis diagnostic indicator, clinical signs of developing a hypersensitivity reaction, reaction time, desensitization scheme and treatment were evaluated. Results: A total of 41 tuberculosis cases were included in the study. Twenty-six of the cases were male; mean age (mean ± SD) 55.44 ±16.93 years; 70.7% of them were diagnosed bacteriologically; 70.7% of them were diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis. The most common skin finding was maculopapular drug eruption. The development time (mean ± SD) of the reaction in patients who developed a reaction was 34.93 ±39.62 days. The responsible agent could be identified in 15 reactions. The most common drug responsible for the reaction was rifampicin. Successful desensitization was achieved in 19 (46.3%) cases with the sensitive regimen. The duration of treatment was 8.97 ±3.44 months. When evaluated in terms of treatment results, cure and treatment completion were accepted as treatment success. In this case, 30 (73.2%) patients successfully completed the treatment. Conclusions: Our study is one of the largest series in which delayed-type hypersensitivity develops under tuberculosis treatment and the desensitization scheme is recommended. A practical, easy desensitization scheme had been shared in this paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This scoping review aimed to map the adverse reactions in the oral mucosa and face caused by the use of natural products. Methodology: This review was performed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, with a protocol registered in the Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/R57D8). The search was carried out systematically using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, and LIVIVO databases, as well as gray literature through Google Scholar and OpenGrey. Reports of clinical cases on the adverse effects of natural products on the oral mucosa or perioral region of the face resulted from inappropriate use or self-medication were included. Data from the included studies were described in a narrative form. Results: Seven hundred and six studies were identified, and after removing duplicates and applying the eligibility criteria, 28 studies were included. The year of publication ranged from 1976 to 2022. The studies were conducted in 19 countries. Fifty patients were mentioned in the included studies and 34 were female (68%). The natural products most related to adverse reactions were propolis (n = 17), with manifestations such as perioral eczema, edema, erosions, erythema, allergic contact dermatitis, and garlic (n = 9), with manifestations such as chemical burn, burning sensation, vesicles and blisters, crusts, and ulcerations. Conclusion: Propolis and garlic were the natural products with the most reported adverse effects on the oral mucosa and perioral region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drug‐induced skin disease or cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) are terms that encompass the clinical manifestations of the skin, mucosae and adnexa induced by a drug or its metabolites. The skin is the organ most frequently affected by drug reactions, which may affect up to 10% of hospitalized patients and occur in 1–3% of multimedicated patients. Most CADRs are mild or self‐resolving conditions; however, 2–6.7% of could develop into potentially life‐threatening conditions. CADRs represent a heterogeneous field and can be diagnostically challenging as they may potentially mimic any dermatosis. Currently, there are between 29–35 different cutaneous drug‐reaction patterns reported ranging from mild dermatitis to an extensively burnt patient. The most frequently reported are maculopapular rash, urticaria/angioedema, fixed drug eruption and erythema multiforme. Less common but more severe patterns include erythroderma, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, and Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis spectrum. Almost any drug can induce a CADR, but antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and antiepileptics are the most frequently involved. Different mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of CADRs, although in some cases, these remain still unknown. CADRs could be classified in different ways: (i) type A (augmented) or type B (bizarre); (ii) immediate or delayed; (iii) immune‐mediated or nonimmune‐mediated; (iv) nonsevere or life‐threatening; and (v) by their phenotype, including exanthematous, urticarial, pustular and blistering morphology. Recognizing a specific CADR will mostly depend on the ability of the physician to perform a detailed clinical examination, the proper description of the morphology of the skin lesions and supporting laboratory and/or skin biopsy findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents a case report of a 50-year-old male who developed a rare skin condition called acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) after undergoing cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) with gadobutrol, a gadolinium-based contrast medium. The patient initially responded well to oral prednisolone treatment, but the rash worsened when the dosage was reduced. The rash was eventually diagnosed as pustular psoriasis or AGEP based on clinical presentation and histopathological findings. Patch testing confirmed a delayed type IV hypersensitivity reaction to gadobutrol. This case highlights the need for increased awareness of AGEP and the potential for adverse reactions to gadolinium-based contrast media. [Extracted from the article]

The article discusses a case of misdiagnosis of crusted scabies, a rare and highly contagious variant of scabies. The patient initially received various diagnoses and treatments that worsened the condition. The article emphasizes the importance of proper diagnosis and treatment, including the use of scabicides and washing of clothing and bedding to prevent transmission and reinfection. Crusted scabies is a severe form of scabies that occurs when the skin's immune system is unable to effectively respond to the parasite. Treatment involves a combination of topical cream and oral medication, but there is concern about drug resistance. It is important to reduce environmental transmission and treat close contacts to prevent reinfection. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are rare but lifethreatening, with antibiotics being the main cause. This retrospective study from a single center was designed to analyze the culprit drugs, clinical features and treatment outcomes of antibiotic-induced SCARs. Methods: We analyzed cases of antibiotic-induced SCARs in a tertiary hospital in China between January 2013 and January 2024, including Steven-Johnson syndrome (SJS) or Stevens-Johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS-TEN) overlap, toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Descriptive analysis of the demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, treatment and prognosis were carried out. Results: Among 354 cases of SCARs, 63 validated antibiotic-related cases were included. Cephalosporins (31.7%), penicillins (25.4%), and quinolones (19.0%) were the most common triggers for SCARs. Overall, liver (50.8%), lungs (31.7%), and kidneys (23.8%) were the most frequently affected organ in SCARs cases. Eight patients (28.6%) in the SJS/SJS-TEN overlap group and 8 patients (80.0%) in the TEN group received combination therapy of corticosteroids and IVIG. Patients with SCARs caused by penicillins or cephalosporins could receive alternative treatments such as lincomamides, quinolones, and tetracyclines. The mortality rate in the TEN group was the highest at 20.0%, followed by the SJS/SJS-TEN overlap group (7.1%), and no deaths were observed in the DRESS and AGEP groups. Conclusion: The identification of the culprit antibiotics and the application of alternative antibiotic therapies are crucial for the management of antibioticinduced SCARs. If complicated underlying conditions and complications like advanced age, cancer and pneumonia coexist with SCARs, patients might be more at risk for mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Saudi Medical Journal is the property of Saudi Medical Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Simple Summary: Many cancer treatments, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy, can cause skin side effects. These are called 'dermatologic toxicities' or 'skin toxicities'. There are many different types of skin toxicities, some of which can not only affect the quality of life but also lead to cancer treatment being stopped or slowed down. This paper gives an overview of 12 of the most common skin toxicities experienced by people receiving cancer treatment. These include rashes, dry skin, skin irritation, hair loss, changes in skin colouring, and itching. We have provided Australia/New Zealand-specific recommendations on how skin toxicities can be prevented and managed, including the role of dermocosmetic solutions. Cancer systemic therapeutics and radiotherapy are often associated with dermatological toxicities that may reduce patients' quality of life and impact their course of cancer treatment. These toxicities cover a wide range of conditions that can be complex to manage with increasing severity. This review provides details on twelve common dermatological toxicities encountered during cancer treatment and offers measures for their prevention and management, particularly in the Australian/New Zealand context where skincare requirements may differ to other regions due to higher cumulative sun damage caused by high ambient ultraviolet (UV) light exposure. Given the frequency of these dermatological toxicities, a proactive phase is envisaged where patients can actively try to prevent skin toxicities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses intertriginous skin disorders, which are common in general practice and can range from benign conditions to chronic diseases. These disorders occur in areas where opposing skin surfaces come into contact, such as the groin folds, axillae, and natal cleft. The article emphasizes the importance of a thorough history and physical examination in diagnosing these disorders and provides a list of common intertriginous skin disorders and their first-line management options. It suggests that referral to a dermatologist may be necessary in certain cases. Overall, the article concludes that most intertriginous skin disorders can be successfully managed in primary care. [Extracted from the article]