87 results on '"doric order"'
Search Results
2. The Design of the Renaissance Cloister of the Cathedral of Zamora
- Author
-
Báez Mezquita, Juan Manuel, Tosi, Francesca, Editor-in-Chief, Germak, Claudio, Series Editor, Zurlo, Francesco, Series Editor, Jinyi, Zhi, Series Editor, Pozzatti Amadori, Marilaine, Series Editor, Caon, Maurizio, Series Editor, Ródenas-López, Manuel A., editor, Calvo-López, José, editor, and Salcedo-Galera, Macarena, editor
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Architectural sculpted decoration of civil basilica in ancient Municipality DD
- Author
-
Bjelić Igor S. and Savić Marija M.
- Subjects
municipium dd ,civil basilica ,late antique architecture ,doric order ,History (General) and history of Europe ,Social sciences (General) ,H1-99 - Abstract
On the occasion of the systematic archaeological research of the forum at the ancient site of the Municipium DD in the north of Kosovo and Metohija, one of the rare examples of a civil basilica was discovered, along with the unusual forms of late antique decorative architectural elements within it. The colonnades from the interior of the basilica consisted of as many as three types of different columns - with a rectangular, oval, and circular base. Each of the examples of these columns had the appropriate bases and capitals, which in their appearance deviate from the most common design of these elements within ancient columns. In this paper, we have determined the place and course of development of specific forms of architectural sculpture in this site. The analysis highlights particular architectural details that determine the identification of the stylistic order to which the forms of our capitals and bases are closest. The special motifs that appear in the form of flutes and lunulae on the capitals determine that the decorative stone sculpture from the civil basilica of Municipium DD belongs to the Doric style. In an attempt by a stonemason to define the shapes of a special type of this order, that is the so-called palm "Pergamon" capitals, it is recognizable that he gave up more demanding details such as leaf ends, which are otherwise characterized by this type. Despite the general affiliation with the Roman Doric architecture, the individual approach of the stonemasons in shaping the capitals meant that certain features were noticed on them, which have not been recognized in other archaeological sites in the Balkans so far. At the same time, on the bases of columns with a circular and oval base, a lack of trochilus and listels, common for shaping ancient bases, is noticeable.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Anadolu Dor Mimarisi: MÖ 4. Yüzyıl | Anatolian Doric Architecture: 4th Century BC
- Author
-
Zeliha Gider Büyüközer
- Subjects
anatolia ,ancient architecture ,doric order ,4th. century bc ,doric capital ,architrave ,doric frieze ,triglyph-metope ,geison ,mutulus ,guttae ,Archaeology ,CC1-960 - Abstract
The temple of Athena at Assos is the only known example in Doric order in Archaic Anatolia. After that, Doric architecture was worked again in the 4th century BC. Particularly with the Ionian Renaissance, which started after the King Peace in 387/6 BC, there is an increase in the number of buildings constructed in the Doric order. The majority of the Doric buildings built in this century were financed by the Carian dynast Mausolus and his successors. In most of these structures, Ionic profiles have been added to the Doric architectural elements, as the Hecatomnids combined the Carian cultural heritage with Anatolian, Greek, and Persian cultures. For this reason, the Anatolian Doric architecture is different from the contemporary structures in the mainland Greece. However, two buildings built in the ancient city of Knidos and Doric buildings in the islands had more influence on mainland Greece. Building Type Many authorities on ancient Greek architecture state that during the fourth century the Doric order was in decline, and that by the Hellenistic period it was virtually abandoned in temple architecture. The archaeological evidence, it is argued, seems to bear this out. Doric temples were built during this period. The temple of Demeter at Priene had an in antis plan, and the temple of Apollo Eretimos at Rhodos had an in antis or prostyle plan. It is thought that the temple of Apollo Pythios on Rhodes was planned prostyle plan and the peripteros was added later. The temple of Athena at Pergamon and the Doric Temple at Knidos were peripteral and both of them had opisthodomos but the Temple of Zeus Khrysaoreus at Alabanda lacked an opisthodomos. And in the ‘temple like’ planning of the andrones at Labraunda Ionic columns are combined with Doric entablature for the first time. The plans of peripteral temples in Mainland Greece have some similarity with contemporaneous Asia Minor architecture. While most of the larger Doric temples in mainland Greece have larger pteromata on the front and back, Ionic temples of the Ionian Renaissance have pteromata of equal size on all four sides, like the Temple of Athena at Pergamon. While other, smaller Doric temples lack an opisthodomos and emphasize the front of the building by a larger hall, the Temple of Athena at Pergamon and the Doric Temple at Knidos have opisthodomoi, as the Late Classical Ionic temples at Labraunda, Priene, and the Artemision at Ephesos. The walls of the cella were not arranged on the axis as the penultimate columns of the peristyle, as was usual in Ionic architecture, but with the outward face of the wall along this axis. The later fifth-century trend toward slenderer columns and wider interaxial spacing also developed further during the fourth century. In Anatolia, which had no known stoa structure during the 5th century BC, in parallel with the art and architecture developed in the 4th century BC, stoas were beginning to be built. The majority of stoas were I-shaped, one-aisled and single story. Generally, there were rooms behind the porticoes. The function of these rooms varies according to the area of the stoas. L-shaped stoas built at Colophon and Miletus were the first examples of the new stoa type that will develop in the cities with Hippodamian plan in the Hellenistic period. In this type, stoas on three sides of a rectangular open space with a street along the fourth, on the opposite side of which is usually another stoa. The street may run along one of the long sides of the rectangle or along one of its short sides, and the other three sides may be defined by one pi-shaped stoa or two L-shaped ones; these two types of stoa are typical of Hellenistic Ionia. All the stoas of Anatolia have Doric outer colonnades. The inner colonnades of the Delphinion at Miletus, which was the only example of two-aisled stoa, also have in the Doric order. Doric exteriors, with Ionic interiors in the case of two-aisled buildings, were by far the most common design from 5th century until late Hellenistic times in Mainland Greece. However, in the stoa built in the 4th century BC in Anatolia, both colonnades were in the Doric order. Three of the buildings dated to the 4th century BC were named as “Doric Buildings.” It has been suggested that the Doric Building at Labraunda could have been used as a fountain or a stoa but it proved to be a fountain. It is thought that Doric architectural blocks in Amyzon may belong to the temple, propylon or stoa. These architectural blocks were dated to the second half of the 4th century, based on their stylistic features. The shape and stylistic features of the Doric architectural elements found in the agora at Iasos are similar to the andrones at Labraunda. In the excavations carried out in the agora, a monument dedicated to the Hecatomnid family and the remains of a building were found. This building, which is called as “Maussolleion” in the inscriptions, will be determined as a result of the study if there is a connection between the architectural blocks belonging to Doric Building A at Iasos. Stylistic Assessment The 4th century BC is a period when the diversity in the form repertoire of Doric architectural blocks increased. Doric columns generally have canonical “Doric flutes”. There are also column drums with basket-arched cross-section type flat flutes and in which the arrises are prominent. In this century, Doric columns with Ionic flutes were used also for the first time in Anatolia. In some of the buildings, the columns were built in “bossed style” (rustication for decorative). One of the innovations seen in the 4th century BC is the introduction of heart-shaped piers into architecture. Developed as an alternative treatment of the re-entrant angles problem in Doric order, this form first appeared in the Harbor Stoa at Miletus. The majority of the Doric capitals are in canonical form: abacus is a flat slab forming, echinus is convex curves of which are not very pronounced, annulets are trapezoidal shaped and a neck. In all of the capitals of this century, the echinus is curled inwards at the point where it intertwines with the abacus. In these capitals, the profile of the annulets was worked in the same direction as the echinus profile axis, and the annulets were the continuation of the echinus. The annulets are trapezoidal and there are three or four of them. The necking of the Doric capitals was decorated in four different ways. Doric architraves consist of a flat taenia, regula and six guttae. The conical shaped guttae were worked in Knidos and the Doric buildings on islands and the cylindrical shaped guttae were worked in Anatolia. For the first time, Doric architrave crowned with astragal and ovolo in the Oikoi Building at Labraunda. Another innovation seen in this century is the soffit carved to the underside of the Doric architraves. The first examples of these soffits, which were seen in the Labraunda buildings, had a rectangular, recessed panel and a flat surface. The proportions of the architraves are in conformity with the contemporary buildings in the mainland Greece and islands. Doric frieze blocks had a rectangular triglyph and metope taenia, as the canonical Doric frieze. But the metope taenia composed of cyma reversa profile in the andrones at Labraunda and Doric Building A at Iasos and ovolo in the monumental tomb at Labraunda. The triglyph taenia were higher than metope taenia in the 5th century and later. But the metope taenia and triglyph taenia were applied at the same height in the end of the 4th century-beginning of the 3rd century. Doric friezes were crowned with a cymatium, composed of astragal and ovolo. The adaptation of the ovolo profile, which was an indispensable element of Anatolian Ionic architecture into the Doric frieze was first observed in the Labraunda buildings. The combination of Doric frieze with Ionic profiles was first introduced in the 6th century BC, in the mainland Greece. But in all of the examples in the mainland Greece, the profile was composed of a small plain astragal. However, this combination reached the peak in the Labraunda buildings with the cyma reversa, astragal and ovolo profiles. In the triglyph-metope blocks, the shaping of the upper end of the glyphs varies. In the majority of the buildings in Anatolia, the upper end of the glyphs is rectangular and the upper lip is cut downwards. This tradition, which began in the Labraunda buildings, soon became the unique style of Anatolian Doric architecture. During this period, glyphs were shaped as flat arches and their upper parts were concave in the Doric buildings of mainland Greece. On the triglyphs of the temple of Athena at Pergamon, the upper end of the glyphs was built in U-shaped. This tradition which began with the Temple of Athena at Assos built in the archaic period in Anatolia continued its existence for centuries. Once its development was completed, the upper bound of half glyphs decorated with triglyph ears became a part of Doric architecture “the fully developed ears” form first appeared in the Labraunda buildings in Anatolia. There are also open sphere-shaped triglyph ears and open dropshaped triglyph ears. In this period, in the Doric building in mainland Greece, it is seen that the hookshaped end of the upper end of the half-glyphs is extended downwards. However, they have more straight lines compared to the drop-shaped examples from Anatolia. One of the innovations seen in the Doric frieze blocks in the 4th century BC is the working the architrave and triglyph-metope in the same block. This is a result of the reduction of the dimensions of the entablature parallel with the expansion of the intercolumniation. Because for the first time in this century, three metopes were placed in each axial space in a temple. The four-metope frieze systems were applied in Labraunda, Priene and Miletus. The increasingly slender and widely spaced Doric columns of the 4th century raised new problems with the elements of the Doric frieze. In archaic and early fifth century Doric, the architrave had been higher than frieze. In the Temple of Zeus at Olympia, the Parthenon and the Hephaisteion at Athens the two elements were equal in height. In the fourth century the height of the frieze continued to increase at the expense of the architrave. Proportion between triglyphs width and the metopes width reach about 1:1,5. By the end of the century, the proportion was decrease to 1:1,43. Although the Doric geison was used in the majority of the 4th century BC buildings, the Doric buildings in Anatolia started to be ended with Ionic geison. Doric geisa, both raking and horizontal, carry a cyma reversa as a soffit molding. This profile, began to use below the mutules, between it and the fascia in Propylaea at Athens, which from the end of the 5th century, was the regular molding of the geison soffit in both the Doric and the Ionic orders. In Andron B and Andron A at Labraunda and Doric Building A at Iasos no molding decorated the soffit of the geison, so below the mutules came a plain vertical fascia. The unprocessed geison soffit in these examples reflects an old tradition of Doric buildings in the 6th and 5th centuries. In the geison block of the Labraunda Doric Building, the geison soffit, which is made up of cyma reversa was used in conjunction with plain astragal. Similar ones of this combination, which is quite unusual for Doric geisons, were found in Mylasa and Halicarnassus. In the geison block found during the excavations around the Hekatomnos Monument in Mylasa and the geison block used as a reused material in the Italian Tower of Bodrum Castle, the geison soffit is made up of plain astragal and cyma reversa profile. Two known examples of cyma reversa profile combined with astragal belong to the Ionic architecture. The first of these is the horizontal geisons of the Erechtheion at Athens dating back to 421-406 and the other one is the Ionic geisons of the Naiskos of the Temple of Apollo at Didyma, dated to the second half of the 4th century. Three examples of this combination, the use on the Doric geisons of which has stayed unknown until know, were found in Hecatomnid buildings in Anatolia. In Doric geisons, the mutulus placed in the area between the geison soffit and the drip is also connected to these two parts. It is seen that guttae’s distribution to the mutulus surface began to change in the beginning of the second half of the century. In the early stages, especially in the triple alining, the distance between the guttae rows is 2 times or slightly more than 2 times the diameter of the guttae, it is usually 1,5 times in the 4th century buildings. The degree of slope of the mutuluses varies between 8° and 10°. The width of the viae is about 1:4 of the mutulus width. Towards the end of the century it is seen that the width of the viae was reduced. The Doric drip consisted of the tip, undercut and fascia, undercut deep, narrow and well curved. The depth of the undercut was considerable, frequently greater than its breadth. The hawksbeak is used as a geison crown. L. T. Shoe said that the chief use of the hawksbeak was for the crowning moulding of the geison of the Doric order, for which it was the regular type from shortly after the middle of the 6th century to the end of the 3rd century. Probably about the middle of the 4th century began the tendency to jog in the lower part of the ovolo and made it into cyma reversa. The cyma recta used as a sima profiles in all Doric buildings. Type S1 is a vertical type and the lower curve is so slight and the upper curve is strongly projecting outward. Type S2 is a vertical type and the lower curve is projecting outward. Type S3 is a diagonal form and the lower curve so slight it is barely tangent to the diagonal. Sima profiles of the Doric buildings in the 4th century generally Type S2 was preferred. Type S1 worked in two buildings in Anatolia, and type S3 worked in islands. Evaluation and Conclusion In the 4th century, the Doric order was preferred in many building types. The majority of these buildings have widely spaced and slenderer columns similar to the Ionic order. This is the result of the reinterpretation of the Doric order of Anatolian architects who are familiar with the symmetry of Ionic architecture. In the Doric architecture of the 4th century BC, a significant Ionic effect is observed. This is interpreted as a result of the choice of other orders in interior design which started at the end of the 5th century. The architects of the 4th century preferred formal decorations on the exterior of the buildings and they used Ionic ornament especially in anta base and on sima, which are seen in Archaic Period buildings in Western Anatolia. The mixture of Doric and Ionic had taken two forms by R. A. Tomlinson: A- The use of both Ionic and Doric columns, and perhaps entablature, in one and the same building. B- The combination of Ionic and Doric elements in a single order. The applications in Doric buildings in Anatolia show that a third form can be added for the mixed order. Because, as seen in the Labraunda buildings, the Anatolian architects, as well as applying the Ionic and Doric order in the same building, they also added profiles such as astragal, ovolo and cyma reversa which are foreign to this order. Therefore, the application of mixed order in the 4th century BC should be divided into three forms. 1- The use of both Ionic and Doric columns, and perhaps entablature, in one and the same building. 2- The combination of Ionic and Doric elements in a single order. 3- Adding Ionic profiles to Doric architectural elements. Anatolian Doric architecture is different from mainland Greece since the archaic period. The reason for this is the different interpretation of the Doric order, which was introduced to the lands where the Ionic order was born, by the Anatolian architects. Therefore, the group created by R.A. Tomlinson for mixed order application should be evaluated under three groups; and Doric architectural elements with Ionic profiles included in the second group should be considered as a separate group: addition of Ionic profiles to the Doric architectural elements . During the Hecatomnid period, the Ionic profiles which have a very long history in Anatolia, were added to at least one of the architectural elements in the buildings constructed in the Doric order. In the Labraunda Oikoi Building, the crown profile consisting of astragal and ovolo, which form the architrave crown, is a profile specific to Ionic architraves, and the Anatolian architects were the ones who carried this profile to the Doric architrave. The fact that the metope taenia is formed with cyma reversa profile in triglyph-metope blocks of Andrones are an innovation. Furthermore, in these andrones, the Doric frieze blocks were crowned with the astragal and ovolo, which are specific to the Ionic order, for the first time. Later on, these Ionic profiles became indispensable in the majority of the Doric buildings in Anatolia. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate these samples which are specific to Anatolian Doric architecture in the third group. The addition of Ionic profiles to Doric architectural elements emerged during the archaic period in western Greece and in mainland Greece. This profiles, seen in the Doric buildings in southern Italy, was studied in the 6th century, where no “canonical Doric order” had yet developed, and then abandoned from the 5th century BC. In some of the 5th century buildings in mainland Greece, after the “canonical Doric order”, plain astragal was added to the upper part of the architrave and Doric frieze blocks and only a certain part of the Parthenon’s friezes this profiles were decorated with bead-and-reel. The use of a crown profile composed of ovolo and astragal in the triglyph-metope blocks of Andron B at Labraunda may be considered as the peak of the prototypes which seen in mainland Greece. This practice, which is limited to a few examples in these buildings, became widespread in Anatolia starting from the 3rd century; this style continued to be used until the Roman period. Thus, triglyph-metope blocks, which are crowned with the Pergamon ovolo, is considered to be a degenerated version of ovolo, is the original style of Anatolian Doric architecture. In the 2nd century BC, the Ionic influences, which were tried from time to time in the Doric architecture from the early stages, reached their peak. In addition to the different profiles crowning the architrave and triglyph-metope frieze, the surface of the Doric architrave has fasciae, and Doric columns were decorated with Ionic flutes. These applications, which are unique to Anatolian Doric architecture, are a unique style that is formed as a result of blending the salient architectural elements of Doric order with the softer aesthetics of Ionic architecture and the foundations of this style were laid in the 4th century.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. The South Stoa at Corinth : design, construction and function of the Greek phase
- Author
-
Scahill, David, Wilson Jones, Mark, and Richens, Paul
- Subjects
938 ,Ancient Greek architecture ,Doric order ,stoa - Abstract
The focus of this dissertation is the design, construction and function of the South Stoa at Corinth in its initial phase. The South Stoa was first published in a monograph by Oscar Broneer in 1954.1 In addition to dealing with the Greek and Roman phases of the building, Broneer’s study also dealt with the “pre-stoa” remains. Certain aspects of the architecture of the stoa, however, were either treated only briefly or were entirely left out of the publication. While it was one of the first attempts at a full study of a secular Greek building, several conclusions deserve re-evaluation, including the date of construction and the design of the building in its initial phase, which has an impact on subsequent phases of remodeling, the function of the building, as well as its place in the historical development of stoas. Re-evaluation of the in situ remains of the stoa combined with newly identified architectural fragments of the building, particularly from the superstructure, provide important evidence to suggest an alternative reconstruction to that previously put forward. This new reconstruction is presented as the most likely solution, in awareness of the possibility that future finds may give rise to modification. As will be shown, the staircases inside the first and last front rooms of the stoa do not belong to the initial building phase as previously thought, but instead date to the Roman period, while evidence in the form of foundations and cuttings for a staircase inside the colonnade at the west end of the stoa, dated prior to 146 B.C., belongs to the initial phase of the building and calls for an entirely different interior reconstruction. The date of the stoa, which has fluctuated from sometime after the middle of the fourth century B.C. (340-320 B.C.) to the early decades of the third century B.C., can now be more precisely determined in view of recent examination of pottery deposits from beneath the stoa terrace, which was built prior to the stoa’s construction. These deposits have been dated between 300-290 B.C., which would push the date of the stoa’s construction to the beginning decades of the third century B.C. This has considerable bearing on the early development of Hellenistic stoas and on the stylistic chronology of several other buildings built around the end of the fourth century B.C. Having resolved aspects of the reconstruction and situated the stoa chronologically, the focus of this study moves on to design considerations, including examination of the proportions and of the ancient foot unit used in the design of the building. Construction and statics of the building are also considered.
- Published
- 2012
6. Doric Order
- Author
-
Kipfer, Barbara Ann
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Dorik Geisonlarda Mutulus Plakaları ile Guttaenın Düzenlenişi | Arrangment of Mutulus and Guttae in Doric Geison
- Author
-
Zeliha Gider Büyüközer
- Subjects
doric order ,doric geison ,mutulus ,guttae ,viae ,Archaeology ,CC1-960 - Abstract
Doric geison blocks with mutules-guttae become standard elements of architecture in the beginning of the 6th century BC. The Doric geison, however, and its different applications in early cases show that distinct development over time. A characteristic of 6th century BC buildings that the mutules-guttae placed on the metope be narrower than the mutules-guttae on triglyphs; accordingly the number of guttae on the surface of the mutules changes. After much experimentation on mutule arrangement and guttae number, architects in the 6th century BC balanced the width of the mutules on the metopes with the triglyphs around 530 BC and fixed the number of guttae as 3x6. The narrow application of the mutules on the metopes was also reapplied occasionally in the Roman period. In the Classical Period, the slope of the mutules was calculated as ± 15° and from the second half of the 4th century BC this angle began to get smaller. In 2nd century BC, the slope of the mutules was usually either very low or there was no slope at all; this implementation continued in the Early Imperial Period. In the earliest examples, thick mutules and long guttae are a characteristic feature in Doric geisons. In Doric buildings in Anatolia, beginning from the 3rd century BC, guttae and mutules began to shrink. Mutules executed in the form of thin plates, however, began in the first half of the 2nd century BC, and this type of mutule continued to be used throughout the Roman period. In some Doric geisons dated to the Late Hellenistic and Early Imperial periods, mutules were separated from viae by a fine line. The mutules placed in the area between the geison soffit and the drips from the early stages are also connected to these two elements. Over time mutules were disconnected from the geison soffit and drip; thus a fine fascia was formed between the geison soffit and the mutules and between mutules and drip. The distribution of guttae over the surface of mutules also evolved over time. In the early stages, the distance between the guttae sequences in the triple sequence is about double or slightly more than double the diameter of the guttae. This distance, which is usually 3:2 in the 4th century BC, was equalized in a few buildings in the 3rd century BC, in the 2nd century BC; the distance between guttae was set narrower than the diameter of guttae. Densely set guttae are a characteristic of buildings from the Roman period. In the Early Imperial period, besides the mutules, with the guttae set aside on the four sides, the opposite practice, which was mutules with guttae pulled toward inside on the four sides, was also used together. Another change in Doric geison is evident in the area between the width of the mutules and the width of the viae. The viae, which were worked at the proportion of 1:5 in the early stages, narrowed steadily later in the period and towards the end of the 1st century AD it decreased as much as the proportion of 1:10.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. SİNOPE'DE BULUNAN DORİK MİMARİ BLOKLAR ÜZERİNE GÖZLEMLER.
- Author
-
YILDIRIM, NAZLI
- Subjects
CONSTRUCTION materials ,ARCHITECTURAL details ,DORIC columns ,TEXTURES ,CAPITAL - Abstract
Copyright of CEDRUS is the property of Mediterranean Civilisations Research Institute and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. KNIDOS DORIK STOA (SOSTRATOS ?): STİLİSTİK DEĞERLENDİRME.
- Author
-
GİDER, Zeliha and BÜYÜKÖZER
- Subjects
- *
ARCHITECTURAL details , *ARCHITECTURAL style , *SHIELDS (Geology) , *TAENIA , *DATABASES , *DRUM playing , *BEDS - Abstract
West of the ancient city of Knidos, situated on the southern end of the third terrace are the remains of a stoa built in the Doric order which is referred to as the “Corinthian Temple Terrace”. The stoa is built along an east-west axis facing towards the Great Harbor. The stoa has a single story with an I-shaped plan and is two-aisled. Many architectural blocks are preserved and cuttings in the bed rock are visible in the field. The stoa is part of a larger building complex probably built by the famous architect Sostratos of Knidos referred to as the “pensilis ambulatio (hanging promenade)” by Pliny (nat. XXXVI, 83), which are generally accepted to be dated to the first half of the 3rd century BC. In previous studies, however, researchers have not taken the style of the architectural blocks into consideration. In this study, architectural blocks of the Doric stoa are studied in detail, and their style characteristics are identified and compared with Doric buildings in the region and in Anatolia. The Doric capitals, the arrangement of the triglyph-metope blocks, and the shape of the triglyph ears closely resemble other buildings established under the sponsorship of Ptolemies. In addition, the Ionic fluted column drums, the execution of the taenia, regulae, and guttae on the architrave blocks, the configuration of the mutulus-guttae in the geison blocks, and the style of cyma reversa type beak profile used as a geison crown are compatible with the architecture of the 3rd century BC. Based on these data we conclude that the stylistic features of Doric Stoa’s architectural elements support the traditional dating in the first half of the 3rd century, and therefore could be associated with Sostratos. The remains of the stoa are insufficient to connect this building with Sostratos’ “pensilis ambulatio” as mentioned in Pliny. It seems that Sostratos of Knidos was active from at least 323 to the 270s and spent all this time in Ptolemaic service. The data obtained from the inscriptions and the stylistic feature of the architectural blocks indicate that the building may have been built between 290-270 BC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
10. A anatomia do templo dórico grego: origem e desenvolvimento.
- Author
-
Gomez Duarte, Claudio Walter
- Subjects
ARCHITECTURAL details ,TEMPLES ,ALTITUDES ,GLOSSES & glossaries - Abstract
Copyright of Romanitas: Revista de Estudos Greco-Latinas is the property of Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. UN EDIFICIO ROMANO E IL SUO RIUSO NELLA BASILICA DI SAN SALVATORE DI SPOLETO.
- Author
-
Cante, Matilde
- Subjects
ARCHITECTURAL details ,ARCHITECTURAL decoration & ornament ,MASONRY ,DORIC columns ,COMPOSITE columns ,MOTION picture locations - Abstract
Copyright of Thiasos is the property of Edizioni Quasar di Severino Tognon s.r.l. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2019
12. The Doric Order as a Fractal
- Author
-
Bovill, Carl, Wassell, Stephen R., editor, and Williams, Kim, editor
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Leonhard Christoph Sturm, lecteur de Germain Brice
- Author
-
Cojannot-Le Blanc, Marianne
- Subjects
ordre dorique ,Marot (Jean) ,Académie Royale d’Architecture ,Parisian architecture ,Sturm (Leonhard Christoph) ,guides to Paris ,Perrault (Claude) ,Perrault (Charles) ,Mansart (François) ,guides de Paris ,architecture parisienne ,Brice (Germain) ,Aviler (Augustin-Charles d’) ,Doric order - Abstract
Les guides de ville, relations de voyages et journaux sont prioritairement utilisés en histoire de l’art comme sources sur les objets qu’elles désignent. Une critique de leur énonciation peut être menée mais leur contenu est plus rarement questionné sous l’angle d’une intertextualité à l’échelle européenne. Cette communication analysera en regard les Architecktonische Reise-Anmerckungen de Leonhard Christoph Sturm et la Description nouvelle de la ville de Paris de Germain Brice, en s’interrogeant sur la pertinence de pareille lecture croisée. City guides, accounts of voyages and journals are mainly used in art history as sources for the objects they refer to. A critique of their formulation can be undertaken, but it is rarer for their content to be examined from the perspective of a European-wide intertextuality. This essay is a comparative analysis of Leonhard Christoph Sturm’s Architecktonische Reise-Anmerckungen and the Description nouvelle de la ville de Paris by Germain Brice, examining the relevance of such a comparative reading.
- Published
- 2022
14. Architectural sculpted decoration of civil basilica in ancient Municipality DD
- Author
-
M Marija Savić and S Igor Bjelić
- Subjects
H1-99 ,060103 classics ,060102 archaeology ,municipium dd ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Rehabilitation ,doric order ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,06 humanities and the arts ,General Medicine ,Art ,Social sciences (General) ,civil basilica ,History (General) and history of Europe ,0601 history and archaeology ,late antique architecture ,media_common - Abstract
On the occasion of the systematic archaeological research of the forum at the ancient site of the Municipium DD in the north of Kosovo and Metohija, one of the rare examples of a civil basilica was discovered, along with the unusual forms of late antique decorative architectural elements within it. The colonnades from the interior of the basilica consisted of as many as three types of different columns - with a rectangular, oval, and circular base. Each of the examples of these columns had the appropriate bases and capitals, which in their appearance deviate from the most common design of these elements within ancient columns. In this paper, we have determined the place and course of development of specific forms of architectural sculpture in this site. The analysis highlights particular architectural details that determine the identification of the stylistic order to which the forms of our capitals and bases are closest. The special motifs that appear in the form of flutes and lunulae on the capitals determine that the decorative stone sculpture from the civil basilica of Municipium DD belongs to the Doric style. In an attempt by a stonemason to define the shapes of a special type of this order, that is the so-called palm "Pergamon" capitals, it is recognizable that he gave up more demanding details such as leaf ends, which are otherwise characterized by this type. Despite the general affiliation with the Roman Doric architecture, the individual approach of the stonemasons in shaping the capitals meant that certain features were noticed on them, which have not been recognized in other archaeological sites in the Balkans so far. At the same time, on the bases of columns with a circular and oval base, a lack of trochilus and listels, common for shaping ancient bases, is noticeable.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Primerjava stebrov v javnih in zasebnih zgradbah v Pompejih
- Author
-
Blatnik, Tina and Zanier, Katharina
- Subjects
dorski stebrni red ,steber ,antična arhitektura ,Pompeii ,column ,Pompeji ,korintski stebrni red ,Doric order ,ancient architecture ,Corinthian order - Abstract
V diplomski nalogi sem primerjala stebre v javnih in zasebnih zgradbah v Pompejih. Delo začenjam z orisom zgodovine raziskav ter urbanističnega in arhitekturnega razvoja Pompejev. V nadaljevanju je predstavljen tipološki pregled stebrnih redov in kapitelov. V osrednjem delu naloge so v kataloški obliki predstavljeni podatki o tipologiji, času nastanka, gradbenem materialu in lokaciji stebrov v izboru objektov v regijah VI, VII in VIII na arheološkem najdišču Pompeji. Sledi analiza, v kateri primerjam značilnosti stebrov, pri čemer je poudarek na razlikah in podobnostih med stebri v javnem in zasebnem kontekstu. Delo zaključujem z razpravo o rezultatih analize, v kateri poskušam potegniti vzporednice z uporabo stebrov in arhitekturnim razvojem Pompejev ter ugotoviti, kako je vloga, ki so jo imeli stebri, vplivala na njihovo oblikovno zasnovo ter na izbiro prostora, v katerem so bili zgrajeni. In my thesis, I compared columns in public and private buildings in Pompeii. I begin my thesis with an outline of the history of research, and the urban and architectural development of Pompeii. In the following, a typological overview of column orders and capitals is presented. In the central part of the thesis, typology, time of construction, building material and location of the columns within selected buildings in regions VI, VII and VIII at the archaeological site of Pompeii are presented in form of a catalogue. In the following analysis I compare the characteristics of the columns, with an emphasis on the differences and similarities between the columns in the public and private context. I conclude my work with a discussion of the results of the analysis, in which I try to draw parallels with the use of columns and the architectural development of Pompeii, and find out how the role of the columns influenced their design and the choice of the room in which they were built.
- Published
- 2021
16. The Golden Ratio in Classical Orders and Interior Design application mechanism
- Author
-
Gamal, Mohamed Hassan Emam, Dina Ashraf Abd el Aziz, and Dina Fekry
- Subjects
Classical order ,business.industry ,Calculus ,Classical architecture ,Golden ratio ,Architecture ,Ionic order ,Greeks ,business ,Doric order ,Mathematics ,Interior design - Abstract
Many contemporary designs of interior design and architecture inspired by classical orders lack the standard basics and rules of this orders –especially the Golden Ratio – which resulted the appearance of designs which lack the values of classical aesthetic and visually distorted due to the absence of the accurate study of the determinates and values of the classical golden ratio. Study Significance: The study significance lay in it’s attempt to handle a factual problem in the field of scientific specialization which is the deformation of classical aesthetic ratio-especially the golden ratio – in the modern interior design works because of not analyzing their aesthetic value and standard ratio. Objectives: Determinate the aesthetic ratios of classical orders and it’s golden ratios and the mechanism of it’s application in interior design to be a reference to the designers in order to understand and evaluate classical aesthetic in the field of scientific specialization. Methodology: The research adopt the historical methodology through the study of the notion of golden ratio and the history of its emergence and application in classical architecture orders , in addition , the applied analytical descriptive methodology is adopted , as a through analysis is conducted to ratios and determinants of classical order and the application the study of the golden ratio in interior design. Results: The Golden Section is a known geometrical and mathematical ratio derived by the Greeks from the measurments of a harmonized ratios human body and the ratio exist between two numbers , spaces and sizes , as they used this ratio in all their designs which had a great effect in establishing aesthetic values of a design and which represented in the equilibrium and compatibility of all the pieces of the design and the choice of it’s ideal ratios , also it was applied later in many interior design and architecture designs, and this ratio is 1.61804. The Greek orders consists of three orders and they are: The Doric order – The Ionic order – The Corinthian order , each of these orders has it’s special ratios , thus designers discovered in them a source of inspiration and though which can be applied in designs through the ages for it’s aesthetic effect which characterized with agility and design accuracy of ratios. During classical ages , the determinants of inner space design spread generally in palaces and other buildings and they all based on the old classical order and the ratio of classical column , as the inner walls was divided into the same aesthetic ratios of classical order. characterized by their accuracy and fulfillment of classical aesthetic values
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. LAGİNA HEKATE KUTSAL ALANI GÜNEY PROPYLONU.
- Author
-
BÜYÜKÖZER, AYTEKİN
- Abstract
Copyright of CEDRUS is the property of Mediterranean Civilisations Research Institute and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Arhitektonska skulptovana dekoracija civilne bazilike u antičkom Municipijumu DD
- Author
-
Bjelić, Igor, Savić, Marija M., Bjelić, Igor, and Savić, Marija M.
- Abstract
Antički lokalitet Minicipijum DD je jedan od retkih u našoj zemlji čiji je forum sistematski arheološki istražen. Akcenat naših istraživanja u radu je na analizama karakteristične arhitektonske skuptovane dekoracije civilne bazilike na južnoj strani foruma. U svetlu novijih saznanja u regionu u mogućnosti smo da odredimo mesto i tok razvoja oblika arhitektonske skulptovane dekoracije i njihovu pojavu u sklopu civilne bazilike. Morfološko-stilskom analizom su izdvojeni posebni detalji koji određuju identifikaciju uslova postojanja i tokove razvoja dekoracije. Ovim saznanjima su preciznije određeni stilski red kojem primerci pripadaju, poreklo uticaja i usaglašenost sa opštim principima oblikovanja rimskih dekorativnih elemenata. Zaključak je da dekorativna kamena plastika iz civilne bazilike Municipijuma DD pripada dorskom stilskom redu, sa primenom posebne vrste tzv. palminih "pergamonskih" kapitela. I pored načelne pripadnosti rimskoj dorskoj arhitekturi, jasan je i individualni pristup klesara pri oblikovanju najdekorativnijih primeraka kamene plastike bazilike., On the occasion of the systematic archaeological research of the forum at the ancient site of the Municipium DD in the north of Kosovo and Metohija, one of the rare examples of a civil basilica was discovered, along with the unusual forms of late antique decorative architectural elements within it. The colonnades from the interior of the basilica consisted of as many as three types of different columns - with a rectangular, oval, and circular base. Each of the examples of these columns had the appropriate bases and capitals, which in their appearance deviate from the most common design of these elements within ancient columns. In this paper, we have determined the place and course of development of specific forms of architectural sculpture in this site. The analysis highlights particular architectural details that determine the identification of the stylistic order to which the forms of our capitals and bases are closest. The special motifs that appear in the form of flutes and lunulae on the capitals determine that the decorative stone sculpture from the civil basilica of Municipium DD belongs to the Doric style. In an attempt by a stonemason to define the shapes of a special type of this order, that is the so-called palm "Pergamon" capitals, it is recognizable that he gave up more demanding details such as leaf ends, which are otherwise characterized by this type. Despite the general affiliation with the Roman Doric architecture, the individual approach of the stonemasons in shaping the capitals meant that certain features were noticed on them, which have not been recognized in other archaeological sites in the Balkans so far. At the same time, on the bases of columns with a circular and oval base, a lack of trochilus and listels, common for shaping ancient bases, is noticeable.
- Published
- 2020
19. DORİK FRİZDEN BİR DETAY: TRİGLİF KULAKLARI.
- Author
-
GİDER BÜYÜKÖZER, Zeliha
- Subjects
- *
ARCHITECTURE , *BUILT environment , *THIRD century, B.C. , *CLASSICAL architecture - Abstract
In the Doric frieze, the small ornamental patterns engraved close to the upper ends of the half triglyphs, bordering the triglyphs are defined as "ears". In this study, 66 different triglyph ears from Anatolia and the immediate vicinity are evaluated, and those are separated into 7 groups according to their shapes. Based on the data gathered in this study, we determined that the different types of triglyphs should be grouped separately, and each group should be studied independently without anticipation of a linear stylistic development. In Anatolian Doric architecture, our first evidence for the the triglyph ear comes from Labraunda Andron B, shortly after which the decorative motif became widespread. The first examples of the closed triglyph ears, made by opening an oval hole on top of the half glyphs, are classified as Type TK1. In the 2nd half of the 4th century BC, the auricle (or pinna) was carved in the shape of a teardrop. Unlike earlier examples, the lower part of the auricle was pointed, and there was a gap left between this part and the surface of the triglyph (Type TK2). At the end the 4th century BC, the lower part of the auricle became thicker, and with this a new form classified as Type TK3. Even though Type TK1 was used on a few buildings after 4th century BC, Types TK2 and TK3 continued to be in use until the Augustan period. The reverse L-shaped triglyph ears classified as Type TK4, are found in only 3 Doric buildings in the 2nd century BC. The D-shaped auricle (Type TK5) and the high relief conical form ornaments (Type TK6) are used on the structures of the early Imperial period. During the 3rd century BC, the reverse S-shaped triglyph ears (Type TK7), were used in 3 buildings in western Anatolia and the East Greek islands, and went out of use by the end of the century. The triglyph ears first seen in Labraunda Andron B dated to 377-353 BC, were used as decorative elements in mainland Greece around the 3rd quarter of the 4th century BC. In Anatolian Doric architecture the triglyph ears are classified in seven different types, and they are considered to be decorative elements given their dimensions and detailed work. They were likely invented by Anatolian architects, accustomed to the more decorative style of Ionic architecture, and introduced to the plain Doric frieze. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
20. The anatomy of the Greek doric temple: origin and development
- Author
-
Claudio Walter Gomez Duarte
- Subjects
Archaeology ,Templo dórico ,Templo períptero ,Doric temple ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Ordem dórica ,Arqueologia ,Peripteral temple ,Doric order ,Arquitetura grega ,Greek architecture - Abstract
Este artigo objetiva abordar a gênese do templo dórico grego até a formação do tipo ou “cânone”, dando ênfase para as teorias mais polêmicas que permeiam o assunto. Abordamos a forma do templo dórico, em planta e elevação. Para isso, construímos uma espécie de glossário, só que minuciosamente detalhado, explicando a forma e função de cada elemento arquitetônico que compõe o templo dórico. Explicamos a nomenclatura para a designação de cada tipo de templo com exemplos para cada formação. Finalizamos o artigo com uma lista cronológica dos principais templos dóricos e uma figura que auxilia o entendimento do tipo dórico. This article aims to address the genesis of the Greek Doric temple until the formation of the type or “canon”, emphasizing the most controversial theories that permeate the subject. We approach the form of the Doric temple, in plan and elevation. For this, we have built a kind of glossary, minutely detailed, which explains the form and function of each architectural element that makes up the Doric temple. We explain the nomenclature for the designation of each type of temple, with examples for each formation. We finish this article with a chronological list of the main Doric temples and an illustration that helps to understand the Doric type.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. TOWARDS RECONSTRUCTING A DORIC COLUMN IN A VIRTUAL CONSTRUCTION SITE
- Author
-
D. Bartzis
- Subjects
lcsh:Applied optics. Photonics ,Engineering drawing ,biology ,lcsh:T ,Acropolis ,business.industry ,Fragment (computer graphics) ,Point cloud ,lcsh:TA1501-1820 ,Cloud computing ,Ancient Greek ,biology.organism_classification ,lcsh:Technology ,Column (database) ,language.human_language ,Geography ,lcsh:TA1-2040 ,language ,lcsh:Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) ,business ,Doric order ,Column model - Abstract
This paper deals with the 3D reconstruction of ancient Greek architectural members, especially with the element of the Doric column. The case study for this project is the Choragic monument of Nicias on the South Slope of the Athenian Acropolis, from which a column drum, two capitals and smaller fragments are preserved. The first goal of this paper is to present some benefits of using 3D reconstruction methods not only in documentation but also in understanding of ancient Greek architectural members. The second goal is to take advantage of the produced point clouds. By using the Cloud Compare software, comparisons are made between the actual architectural members and an “ideal” point cloud of the whole column in its original form. Seeking for probable overlaps between the two point clouds could assist in estimating the original position of each member/fragment on the column. This method is expanded with more comparisons between the reference column model and other members/fragments around the Acropolis, which may have not yet been ascribed to the monument of Nicias.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Contributo allo studio dell’ordine dorico di età ellenistica in Sicilia. Il caso di Lipari
- Author
-
Fuduli, Leonardo
- Subjects
architettura ellenistica ,architectural decoration ,Dorico ,reimpiego ,decorazione architettonica ,Hellenistic architecture ,Hellenism ,Lipari ,Doric order ,Ellenismo ,reuse - Abstract
Gli elementi di decorazione architettonica dorica provenienti da Lipari, parte custoditi nel Museo e parte reimpiegati in edifici medievali, sono i soli resti di strutture non più esistenti. Allo stato attuale delle conoscenze non sono noti edifici monumentali dal territorio e questi disiecta membra sono quasi il solo dato sul quale poter indagare sull’architettura ellenistica dell’isola. Nonostante le difficoltà relative a una ricostruzione della loro provenienza, destinata a rimanere del tutto ipotetica, ma probabilmente da individuare nel quartiere abitativo della città, l’impiego del materiale vulcanico utilizzato, ampiamente disponibile sull’isola, induce a ritenere come sicura una loro realizzazione locale. Sotto il profilo stilistico invece sono vari i legami con la Sicilia e anche con l’Oriente del Mediterraneo, regioni dalle quali è probabile che provenissero alcune delle maestranze che li realizzarono., In recent decades archaeological research in Lipari has revealed some elements of Doric architectural decoration, which are currently kept in the Regional Museum or were reused in medieval buildings. At present, our knowledge of the monumental buildings of ancient Lipára is very limited; the architectural elements presented here represent the only possibility to learn more about the Hellenistic architecture of the island. Despite the difficulties arising from their fragmentary state and reuse, it is probable that they came from the residential quarter of the ancient city. Moreover, their material, a volcanic stone, testifies to production on the island. From a stylistic point of view, there are several links with Sicily and the East Mediterranean, perhaps attributable to Sicilian craftsmen working on the island., Archäologischer Anzeiger, 2. Halbband (2018)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. The Parthenon from the Greek Revival to modern architecture
- Author
-
Lena Lambrinou
- Subjects
History ,biology ,Acropolis ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Perfection ,Ancient history ,biology.organism_classification ,Style (visual arts) ,Symbol ,Simplicity ,Architecture ,Archetype ,Doric order ,media_common - Abstract
The Parthenon on the Acropolis in Athens, built in the fifth century BC, became the symbol of a golden era of antiquity during the Greek Revival era of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Representing one of the greatest architectural and artistic achievements of the ancient Eastern Mediterranean world, it came to be the preferred archetype in the West for many public and governmental buildings as well as private mansions. From elegant incorporations to brutal imitations, Parthenon-inspired designs could be found everywhere, as the image of Periclean Athens’ magnificent temple, dedicated to the city’s divine patroness Athena, became a familiar, beloved plaything of Neoclassical architects around the world. Architectural design elements inspired by the Parthenon appear especially in the Neoclassical architecture of Europe (Germany, England, Italy), the United States, and even Australia. Moreover, principles of the Doric order, including symmetry, morphological simplicity, and building proportional to a human scale, as well as the concepts of constructional perfection and structural rationalism, can be found integrated even into subsequent modern architecture of the twentieth century. Distinct allusions to the Parthenon’s style within the architectural environment of today’s modern world renders this unique ancient structure a hallmark of architectural continuity through the centuries.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Fit for a King: Architectural Decor in Judaea and Herod as Trendsetter
- Author
-
Orit Peleg-Barkat
- Subjects
Cultural Studies ,Cornice ,Archeology ,History ,Adornment ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Taste (sociology) ,Empire ,Art ,Ancient history ,Stucco ,Architecture ,Doric order ,Order (virtue) ,media_common - Abstract
This paper pays close attention to architectural decoration in King Herod's construction projects and offers a renewed perspective on Herod's use of monumental display to situate his own kingdom within the empire. His increased reliance on the Corinthian rather than the Doric order, for example, appears to reflect Augustus's choice of the Corinthian order as representing the new Roman taste. His introduction into local architecture of particularly Roman architectural elements, such as the stucco ceilings of the “coffer-style” and the console cornice, moreover, transformed the adornment of buildings throughout Judaea. The recently discovered mausoleum in Herodium identified by its excavators as Herod's tomb exemplifies how these new Roman trends were incorporated into the local Hellenistic architectural tradition. I suggest that Herod's decorative program influenced the tastes of many of his subjects; the architectural decoration in cities such as Jerusalem demonstrates how the innovations introduced by He...
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. The order of an architectural column in the eraof elizabethan baroque (1742—1762) in St. Petersburg
- Subjects
Style (visual arts) ,Composite order ,Column (typography) ,Baroque ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Art history ,Flute ,Art ,Ionic order ,Doric order ,Order (virtue) ,media_common ,Visual arts - Abstract
The author discusses structural principles of the column order attributed to Elizabethan Baroque Style and uses St. Petersburg monuments as examples. The article has drawings of columns and architectural details of the Baroque style buildings in St. Petersburg. The author identifies their specific stylistic features and compares them with classical architectural forms.The column order of the Elizabethan Baroque style is built according to classical rules, although it has substantial deviations. Back then, only three types of orders were used: a Doric order, an Ionic order and a composite order. Order profiles and capitals were changed in the era of Elizabethan baroque style; therefore, Ionian and composite capitals of the Elizabethan Baroque style differ from those of Vignola and Palladio. Necks of capitals were smooth or had flutes. The Elizabethan Ionic order is based on a subset of Ionic capitals, typical for the era of late Renaissance. Creative ideas and skills of architects developed an own language of architectural forms, typical for this style.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. New data on the gymnasion of paides in Kos
- Author
-
Livadiotti, Monica
- Subjects
Kos, gymnasion, Hellenistic architecture, Doric order, Ptolemy ,Kos ,Ptolemy ,gymnasion ,Hellenistic architecture ,Doric order - Published
- 2016
27. A STUDY OF THE PERISTYLAR PLAN OF THE TEMPLE OF MESSENE AT ANCIENT MESSENE
- Author
-
Yoshinobu Hayashida, Juko Ito, and Nobuaki Yasui
- Subjects
Engineering ,business.industry ,Peristyle ,Stylobate ,Plan (archaeology) ,Archaeology ,Transitional Style ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Classical period ,Temple ,medicine ,Agora ,business ,Doric order ,computer ,computer.programming_language - Abstract
The Doric Temple of Messene at ancient Messene, Peloponnesos, was located in the southwest part of the Agora. It was excavated by the Society of Messenian Archaeological Studies from to 2003 until 2006. The authors participated in its field research and measured the site and blocks to make the drawings. The temple has been all ruined with remains of staircase of several steps on the west front and decades of architectural blocks. This short paper is to analyze the temple plan on its peristyle or its exterior colonnades based on the detailed study of the shape and dimensions of the block. Consequently, the present study brought the result that the temple had six columns in fronts and twelve on the sides. The lower column diameter was 0.808 m and the intercolumniation was 1.922 m. The staircase on the west did not belong to the main body of the temple but formed a somewhat Roman-type podium with nine steps, although it was basically used for the citizens to rise up to the temple easily. The architectural style of Doric temple had been already perfected in the Classical period. Thus, this temple is architecturally interesting from the viewpoint of transitional style of Doric order.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. The Doric Order as a Fractal
- Author
-
Carl Bovill
- Subjects
Harmony (color) ,Fractal ,Iterated function system ,Visual Arts and Performing Arts ,Entablature ,General Mathematics ,Architecture ,Attractor ,Geometry ,Lintel ,History general ,Doric order ,Mathematics - Abstract
Owen Jones in The Grammar of Ornament clearly states that ornament comes from a deep observation of nature. He emphasizes the importance of the harmony of the parts and the subordination of one part to another. This subordination and harmony between the parts is what fractal geometry explores as self-similarity and self-affinity. An iterated function system (IFS) is a digital method of producing fractals. An IFS in the shape of columns holding up a lintel produced an attractor displaying fluted columns with capitals and an entablature with the proper number and spacing of triglyphs and mutules. Thus, fractal geometry, through the use of iterated function systems, provides a new insight into the intention of Doric ornament design.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Museum Review: Rethinking Space, Light, and Pedagogy
- Author
-
John R. Clarke
- Subjects
Literature ,Archeology ,Sculpture ,business.product_category ,business.industry ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Art history ,Art ,Capital (architecture) ,Portrait ,Ruler ,Loggia ,Statue ,Roman art ,business ,Doric order ,media_common - Abstract
Like many scholars of my generation, I have followed the vicissitudes of the Metropolitan Museum's classical collections over the past 40 years.1 Beginning with the conversion of the Roman Court to a restaurant in 1954, the collection has been the victim of one space-squeeze after another: the second-floor Etruscan galleries disappeared in the 1980s, when, illogically, the Greek vases migrated upstairs, divorced from the sculpture and bronzes. Even at that, except for the temporary but spectacular display of the Euphronios krater after its acquisition in 1972, the vases were crowded into antiquated cabinets and difficult to study. But the later classical collections suffered even more, being in large part relegated to storage for nearly two decades. The opening of the galleries devoted to Hellenistic, Roman, and Etruscan art is both long-awaited and welcome.2 It is the culmination of a 17-year process that began with the refurbishing of the Greek galleries, beautifully realized by the firm of Kevin Roche John Dinkeloo and Associates and opened to the public in 1999. At that time, most of the Roman objects disappeared from view. Until then, in a selective but crowded display, Roman art had a home in what is now the Belfer Court, an airy space occupying the entire width of the wing where the temporal sequence now begins with Minoan, Bronze Age, and Geometric art. For years, the Boscoreale cubiculum, housed in the corner of the grand entry hall just before the entrance to the Belfer Court, constituted a kind of prelude to the Roman collection. Now there is a tiny gift shop in that space. The Greek galleries to either side of the Greek sculpture court the central, axial path to the Roman Court focus almost exclusively on Attic art and set expectations for the new wing. When one considers the earlier segregation of Greek vases from the other works in the collections, the mix of media and scale here within each chronological period is a notable feature of the display. Well-designed plate glass cases with glass shelves suspended by an ingenious system of chrome rods encourage close viewing from all angles. Both the chronological sequence and display solutions adopted in the Greek galleries in 1999 prefigure those employed in the new Hellenistic and Roman galleries, where curator Carlos Picon's philosophy of mixing media and artistic genres becomes more complex and enticing. The prelude to the feast is the transverse space that crosses the axis of the Greek sculpture court and is now devoted to Hellenistic sculpture and architecture. At its center, viewers will recognize an old friend in the great Ionic base and capital from Sardis (fig. 1). Even so, it is a peculiar object to represent Hellenistic architecture, being monumental yet strangely truncated without the column shaft. To the left, a one-and-a-half times life-sized bronze portrait statue dominates the space. It rivals the so-called Hellenistic Ruler from the Museo Nazionale in Rome for its quality and state of preservation and has been conjectured to depict a Pergamene ruler. Like several other spectacular sculptures on display, it is loaned from the Leon Levy and Shelby White collection and lacks provenance and cultural context.3 On the wall near the great bronze is a shelf devoted to fine marble portrait heads that effectively convey the huge range of emotional expressions characterizing Hellenistic portraiture. A beautifully preserved Late Hellenistic bronze statue of a man stands nearby; although headless, it preserves in amazing detail the hands, sandaled feet, and even the folds and embroidery in the fabric of his himation. The Roman Court, renamed the Leon Levy and Shelby White Court, now soars to double its former vertical volume (fig. 2). This decision seems a mixed success.4 On the one hand, its proportions are harmonic, and the segmental barrel vault in clear glass floods the court with light. The architects were, in fact, returning to the design that was preferred by McKim, Mead, and White in their 1912 plan but was ultimately rejected. An Ionic order tops the Doric order of the ground floor; behind the freestanding columns are walls and windows, making this upper story a kind of blind loggia. On the other hand, even monumental works such as the Hope Dionysos, set on the central axis at the far edge of the court, are dwarfed by the huge vertical volumes, and smaller statues as well as portrait heads on pedestals seem a bit lost. The grand space diminishes celebrated works such as the statue best known as the Old Market Woman. (The label now identifies her as an aged courtesan on her way to a festival of Dionysos a somewhat unlikely interpretation and updates her to the Julio-Claudian period.) The figures that
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Tripods, Triglyphs, and the Origin of the Doric Frieze
- Author
-
Mark Wilson Jones
- Subjects
Literature ,Archeology ,Frieze ,History ,Votive offering ,business.industry ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Interpretation (philosophy) ,Doctrine ,Triglyph ,Symbol ,Orient ,business ,Doric order ,media_common - Abstract
The standard wisdom on the origins of the Doric order revolves around the doctrine of petrification, by which a previously established timber vocabulary came to be perpetuated in stone once society acquired the means to build in this material. While the petrification doctrine takes its authority from the Roman architect-writer Vitruvius, and finds support from parallel processes observable elsewhere in the world, it none the less copes inadequately with the archaeological realities of Greece in the late Geometric and early Archaic periods. In particular, the form, size, and placement of the triglyphs in the frieze are not necessarily demanded by the logic of timber construction and the configuration of early temple superstructures. A growing number of scholars accordingly challenge the Vitruvian consensus, whether by tracing the Doric frieze back to Mycenae, Egypt, the Orient, and idioms of pattern making in Geometric art, or by arguing for symbolic modes of interpretation. After briefly reviewing these approaches, this paper presents connections between triglyphs and tripods, ritual objects of considerable significance for early Greek cultural and religious life. The formal characteristics of tripods and representations of tripods find echoes in the generic compositional structure of the triglyph. Depictions of multiple tripods alternating with decorative motifs recall the rhythmical disposition of the triglyph and metope frieze, while certain small-scale details on bronze tripod legs find counterparts in non-canonic types of triglyph. The concluding section initiates a debate over the explanation for these affinities by exploring the significance of the tripod and its many associations: as aristocratic gift with heroic overtones, as agonistic prize, as oracular instrument, as Apolline symbol, as the Greeks' ultimate votive offering. Some of these themes can strike chords with Greek temples, so there thus emerges the possibility that the triglyph frieze was invented to articulate visually the programmatic concerns of their builders.
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. At the Bottom of the Garden: The Caffeaus of Villa Albani
- Author
-
Jane Lomholt
- Subjects
Sculpture ,Underline ,lcsh:NX1-820 ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Carlo Marchionni ,Art history ,Context (language use) ,Pavilion ,Art ,lcsh:Arts in general ,Villa Albani ,language.human_language ,pavilion ,German ,Scholarship ,Winckelmann ,Caffeaus ,language ,art collection ,Doric order ,media_common - Abstract
This paper addresses the history and design of a pavilion at the Villa Albani in Rome. Built in 1764 by the architect Carlo Marchionni, possibly to a design by the client, the antiquarian Cardinal Alessandro Albani, this is a caffeaus (or coffee house, to offer a rough translation) featuring an eleven-bay semi-circular portico of Doric order. The taking of coffee after dinner had become a popular pastime and some, who could afford it, built special pavilions in their gardens for this purpose. Pope Benedict XIV, for instance, had a caffeaus built in his garden at the Quirinal Palace some twenty years earlier, where he could withdraw from the formalities of courtly life. For Cardinal Albani, the caffeaus also served as an extension to his Casino, where his vast collection of sculptures, busts and basins was displayed. With the aid of his librarian, the German scholar and writer Johann Joachim Winckelmann, Albani displayed his immense and unique collection of art and antiquities in a way that served to underline his own scholarship, wealth and position of affinity with Rome. The Villa and its splendours were not to be missed by the Grand Tourists. This paper will situate this exceptional pavilion in the wider context of his Villa, whose gardens and buildings today lie in various stages of disrepair and are closed to the public, except by private invitation.
- Published
- 2014
32. The temples of Magna Grecia and comparison with the temples of mainland of Greece in 6th and 5th century BC
- Author
-
Dobrovodská, Tereza, Ondřejová, Iva, and Bouzek, Jan
- Subjects
iónský řád ,Velké Řecko ,Greek colonization ,dórský řád ,Magna Grecia ,řecká kolonizace ,Greek temples ,ionic order ,řecké chrámy ,řecká architektura ,doric order ,Greek architecture - Abstract
This master thesis deals with comparison of Greek temples in areas of Magna Graecia and the mainland Greece from the 6th and 5th centuries BC. The first chapter covers with the Greek colonization in Sicily and south Italy. Main temple buildings from both areas are described and compared in following chapters. All the differences between both areas are summarized in the end of the thesis.
- Published
- 2014
33. Ilion from the Flavians to the Byzantines
- Author
-
Charles Brian Rose
- Subjects
Geography ,biology ,Classical archaeology ,Iconoclasm ,Caligula ,Ancient history ,Reliquary ,biology.organism_classification ,Archaeology ,Doric order ,Byzantine architecture ,Smyrna ,Rhea Silvia - Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Late Hellenistic and Early Imperial Ilion
- Author
-
Charles Brian Rose
- Subjects
biology ,media_common.quotation_subject ,City wall ,Caligula ,Art ,Ancient history ,biology.organism_classification ,Archaeology ,Colophon ,Classical archaeology ,Black sea ,Sextus ,Doric order ,media_common - Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Ilion in the Early Hellenistic Period
- Author
-
Charles Brian Rose
- Subjects
biology ,media_common.quotation_subject ,City wall ,Apollo ,Hellenistic period ,Art ,Ancient history ,biology.organism_classification ,Archaeology ,Smyrna ,Nike ,Classical archaeology ,Synoecism ,Doric order ,media_common - Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Lo hestiatorion dell'Asklepieion di Kos
- Author
-
Livadiotti, Monica
- Subjects
sanctuary ,hestiatorion ,altar ,Dodecaneso ,abaton ,Santuario ,Architettura ellenistica ,Architettura romana ,Kos ,oikos ,biblioteca ,Eronda ,abaton, altar, Asklepieion, Caius Stertinius Xenophon, Dodecanese, Doric order, Kos, Hellenistic architecture, Herodas, Rudolph Herzog, hestiatorion, Ionic order, library, Luciano Laurenzi, mimiamb, Luigi Morricone, oikos, sanctuary, temple, Iacopos Zarraftis ,temple ,Caius Stertinius Xenophon ,Doric order ,mimiamb ,Luigi Morricone ,library ,Hellenistic architecture ,Rudolph Herzog ,Asklepieion ,Dodecanese ,Herodas ,Ionic order ,Luciano Laurenzi ,Iacopos Zarraftis - Published
- 2013
37. <scp>B</scp> ramante, <scp>D</scp> onato (1444–1514)
- Author
-
George Thomas Kurian
- Subjects
Painting ,Cloister ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Art history ,Art ,Visual arts ,Chapel ,Colonnade ,Choir ,Cella ,Architecture ,computer ,Doric order ,computer.programming_language ,media_common - Abstract
Also known as Donato di Angelo. Italian architect and painter. His approach to architecture was strongly influenced by painters, such as Mantegna. His first church was Sta Maria presso S. Satiro in Milan in the late 1470s. Here he makes brilliant use of perspective to create the illusion of a three-bay choir on a flat wall. In the 1470s he added a tribune to Sta Maria delle Grazie. Later he went to Rome where he worked on the cloister of Sta Maria della Pace between 1500 and 1504. His next work was the Tempietto in the courtyard of San Pietro in Montorio where he designed a centrally planned martyrium using the Doric order and carving the instruments of the Mass on the colonnade surrounding the cella of the chapel. This led to his appointment as architect of the rebuilding of the Old St. Peter's. Bramante's original design was for a centrally planned church with identical arms. The foundation stone was laid by Pope Julius II. Bramante's plan was abandoned as other architects took over the project, but it inspired Michelangelo, whose grander vision ultimately prevailed. Bramante was also a painter whose somber and poignant Christ at the Column shows the influence of Leonardo. Keywords: Bramante, Donato (1444–1514); donato di angelo. Italian architect and painter; workings, on cloister of sta Maria della Pace; architect, of rebuilding of the old St. Peter's; Bramante's painting, christ at the column
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. ARCHITECTURAL VISION
- Author
-
John R. Senseney
- Subjects
Sculpture ,Carpentry ,biology ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Eurythmia ,Art ,biology.organism_classification ,Visual arts ,Classical archaeology ,Agora ,Architectural technology ,Doric order ,computer ,Architectural drawing ,media_common ,computer.programming_language - Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. From Conquest To Pax Romana The Signa Recepta And The End Of The Triumphalfasti In 19 Bc
- Author
-
Ida Östenberg
- Subjects
Literature ,Pilaster ,business.industry ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Art ,Ancient history ,business ,Doric order ,Inscribed figure ,CONQUEST ,media_common - Abstract
The Fasti consulares , naming Rome's magistrates, were inscribed on four panels that were framed by small Corinthian pilasters, while the Fasti triumphales , displaying the names of Roman triumphators, were inscribed on four pilasters of Doric order. The list of Roman triumphators stops sharply at 19 BC. There were no later additions; in fact, there was not even any space spared on the four pilasters to add more names. Thus, the Fasti triumphales were not a list in active use, but were edited and published at one time as a fully completed and closed record. In emphasising the connection between Augustus' return and the end of the Fasti triumphales , the author argues that the Parthian arch with its celebration of the signa recepta and its completed list of past triumphs symbolically announced the beginning of a new age, in which foreign people submitted to the pax Romana without bloodshed. Keywords: Fasti triumphales ; pax Romana ; signa recepta
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. L'ordine dorico nel 'De re aedificatoria': modelli e interpretazioni
- Author
-
Zampa, Paola
- Subjects
Leon Battista Alberti ,ordine dorico ,basilica Emilia ,Doric order - Published
- 2007
41. Giuliano da Sangallo. Profili di trabeazioni: foro di Traiano e basilica Emilia
- Author
-
Zampa, Paola
- Subjects
Giuliano da Sangallo ,basilica Emilia ,doric order ,ordine dorico ,taccuino Senese ,codice barberiniano latino 4424 - Published
- 2005
42. Basilica Emilia, frammento della sottocornice
- Author
-
Zampa, Paola
- Subjects
basilica Emilia ,Leon Battista Alberti ,doric order ,ordine dorico - Published
- 2005
43. Antonio da Sangallo il Vecchio (?). Pianta e prospetto del fronte nord-occidentale della basilica Emilia
- Author
-
Zampa, Paola
- Subjects
basilica Emilia ,Antonio da Sangallo the elder ,doric order ,Codice Strozzi ,Antonio da Sangallo il Vecchio ,ordine dorico - Published
- 2005
44. Francesco di Giorgio, esempi di trabeazioni e capitelli dorici
- Author
-
Zampa, Paola
- Subjects
basilica Emilia ,Francesco di Giorgio ,ordine dorico ,doric order - Published
- 2005
45. Greek Temples and Their Decoration
- Author
-
Susan Woodford
- Subjects
Capital (architecture) ,Sculpture ,Chariot ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Colonnade ,Stylobate ,Art ,Opisthodomos ,Cella ,Ancient history ,Doric order ,media_common ,Visual arts - Published
- 2004
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. The Principal Design Methods for Greek Doric Temples and Their Modification for the Parthenon
- Author
-
Gene Waddell
- Subjects
Visual Arts and Performing Arts ,Column (typography) ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Architecture ,Stylobate ,Number ratio ,Art ,Ancient history ,Doric order ,media_common - Abstract
During the fifth century B.C., Greek architects perfected a method for designing Doric peripteral temples, and this procedure was used for most temples constructed during the second half of the century in mainland Greece and in its colonies. This procedure had to be determined in order to see how it was adapted to design the Parthenon. Minor modifications enabled the architects of the Parthenon to achieve greater commensurability than for any other Doric temple (Fig. 1). To lay foundations for a Doric temple, an architect needed to know the number of columns and the overall length. Since nearly all peripteral temples of the Doric Order have six columns on their fronts, the first decision which ordinarily needed to be made was how many columns would be used on the sides, and for hexastyle temples this ranged from ten to sixteen columns. The ratio of the number of columns on the fronts to the number on the sides determined the overall form and was the single most important ratio which had to be selected. The column number ratio was reused as the ratio for the stylobate of some of the earliest stone temples (Table 1, column 2; Table 2, column 6), and it was later applied to the krepis. It was used as the ratio of the krepis for the great majority of temples constructed from c. 535 and c. 320 (Table 1, column 1; Table 2, column 4).
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Stylobate and Roof in the Olympieion at Akragas
- Author
-
Malcolm Bell
- Subjects
Archeology ,Sculpture ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,History ,Peristyle ,Temple ,Stylobate ,Pythagorean theorem ,medicine ,Ancient history ,Doric order ,Roof - Abstract
The Temple of Zeus at Akragas is poorly preserved and imperfectly known. This article offers an analysis of its dimensions and of the principles which might have determined the anomalous arrangement of the columns. Suggestions are made for the interior plan and for the roofing of the structure, which probably included an hypaethral section in the center. Pythagorean beliefs and number theories may have influenced the shaping of this unusual temple. Among Doric temples the Olympieion of Akragas stands apart.1 Anomalous in scale and architectural form, the building seems intended to set forth a radical solution to the problem of Doric design. In size it was the largest temple in Sicily and the largest ever attempted anywhere in the Doric order. The strange design (ill. i) transforms the anticipated peristyle into a perimeter wall, creating interior spaces of unprecedented vastness. The order is treated with great freedom, with regard both to its structure and to the inclusion of non-Doric elements, some Ionic in origin and others unique. The temple bore the only major pedimental sculptures in Sicily, now almost entirely lost, and it incorporated into its design a series of colossal male figures, or Atlantes, which for more than a century have provoked debate as to their function and
- Published
- 1980
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Complexity, Ambiguity and Totality in Greek Sacred Architecture
- Author
-
Arthur Rapanos and Estelle A. Maré
- Subjects
Literature ,biology ,business.industry ,Acropolis ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Apollo ,Ambiguity ,Ancient Greek ,biology.organism_classification ,language.human_language ,Geography ,language ,Imperfect ,Architecture ,business ,Doric order ,Classics ,Order (virtue) ,media_common - Abstract
HYPOTHESESThe temple complexes of Apollo (Delphi) and the Parthenon (Acropolis, Athens) demonstrate that: 1. Classical Greek architecture was purposely developed into a perceived totality, using its approach environs in a conscious application of serial vision1 to heighten the participant's2 awareness of the Main Temple.2. Classical Greek architecture was not exclusively an architecture of three classical orders, but an architecture on two hierarchical levels: viz. the divine order, a perfect, eternal Doric Temple relating to earth, sky and horizons, and a secondary human order of auxiliary buildings characterized by complexity3 and ambiguity4 in the sense of being imperfect, restless, of varied design and not oriented to a geometrical axis, in order to contrast with the Divine Doric order embodied in the Main Temple.3. The Propylaea, Erechtheum and Temple of Athena Nike, all three on the Acropolis of Athens, as well as the various small buildings along the Sacred Way at Delphi, are examples of buildings ...
- Published
- 1984
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Early Corinthian Architecture and the Origins of the Doric Order
- Author
-
Robin F. Rhodes
- Subjects
Archeology ,History ,Interpretation (philosophy) ,Foundation (engineering) ,Architecture ,Doric order ,Classics - Abstract
The traditional approach to the study of early monumental architecture in Greece has been based upon the Vitruvian interpretation of the Doric order. As a consequence, very early stone buildings which preserve few or no recognizable traces of the Doric order have been reconstructed as fully Doric; the missing pieces are simply reconstructed in wood. But neither pre-Doric nor Doric architecture can be fully understood in terms of the developed Doric order. The foundation for the study of either has to be the physical remains of pre-Doric buildings in Greece. Perhaps the most logical area in which to begin a study of the roots of monumental architecture in Greece is the Corinthia, which tradition associates with the earliest monumental architecture.' The dis
- Published
- 1987
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. The Treatment of Re-Entrant Angles
- Author
-
J. J. Coulton
- Subjects
Archeology ,History ,Visual Arts and Performing Arts ,Re entrant ,Triglyph ,Classics ,Complex problems ,Doric order - Abstract
The triglyph problem which arose at the corners of a Doric building, and was held by Vitruvius to be responsible for the disuse of the Doric order in Roman times, has for many years been discussed by archaeologists. The best short explanation of the difficulties involved is probably that by Robertson. The much more complex problems which are met at a re-entrant angle in the Doric order, have, on the other hand, received little attention, for such angles do not occur in temples, the type of building which has been studied most thoroughly. They do, however, appear fairly frequently in more utilitarian buildings such as stoas and palaistras, and various treatments of them were evolved.
- Published
- 1966
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.