Search

IntroductionThe demographics of donor and recipient candidates for kidney transplantation (KT) have substantially changed. Recipients tend to be older and polymorbid and KT to suboptimal recipients is associated with delayed graft function (DGF), prolonged hospitalization, inferior long-term allograft function, and poorer patient survival. In parallel, donors are also older, suffer from several comorbidities, and donations coming from circulatory death (DCD) predominate, which in turn leads to early and late complications. However, it is unclear how donor and recipient risk factors interact.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we assess the impact of a KT from suboptimal donors to suboptimal recipients. We focused on: 1) DGF; 2) hospital stay and number of dialysis days after KT and 3) allograft function at 12 months.Results and discussionAmong the 369 KT included, the overall DGF rate was 25% (n = 92) and median time from reperfusion to DGF resolution was 7.8 days (IQR: 3.0–13.8 days). Overall, patients received four dialysis sessions (IQR: 2–8). The combination of pre-KT anuria (

A 55-year-old man with end-stage heart failure, who had an orthotopic heart transplant 21 years prior, underwent heart retransplantation using a heart from a donor with circulatory death in a distant location and an extended transport period with normothermic ex vivo perfusion. Owing to the persistent and worsening shortage of donor hearts, this case illustrates that expanding the donor acceptance criteria to include more distant donor locations and enrolling recipients with extended criteria (e.g., heart retransplantation) is feasible.

Introduction: Utilizing allografts from donors after cardiac death (DCD) has improved organ availability, and DCD livers comprise a growing proportion of transplantations. However, it has been suggested that DCD transplantations have worse outcomes. Research Questions: We aimed to characterize outcomes in a large cohort of DCD transplantations, identify trends in outcomes over time, and identify factors associated with the development of biliary complications. Design: We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study of patients receiving DCD liver allografts within a large academic teaching hospital with a high transplantation volume. Consecutive patients who underwent Type III DCD liver transplantation from 2006–2016 were included in our cohort. Re-transplantations and multi-organ transplant recipients were excluded. Results: Ninety-six type III DCD transplantations occurred between 2006–2016. We report a 1one-year patient survival of 90.6% (87) and a 5five-year patient survival of 69.8% (67). Twenty-nine (30.2%) patients experienced any biliary complication in the first year following discharge, with 17 (17.7%) experiencing ischemic cholangiopathy. Five-year patient (P = 0.04) and graft (P = 0.005) survival improved over time. Post-operative biliary complications experienced during index admission and prior to discharge were found to be associated with the development of biliary complications (P = 0.005) and ischemic cholangiopathy (P = 0.01) following discharge. Conclusion: Our data suggested that outcomes using DCD allografts have improved, however biliary complications remain a significant issue in DCD transplantation. Patients who experienced post-operative biliary complications during index admission may require more frequent screening to allow the initiation of earlier treatment for biliary complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Studia Iuridica Toruniensia is the property of Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Faculty of Law & Administration and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: The demographics of donor and recipient candidates for kidney transplantation (KT) have substantially changed. Recipients tend to be older and polymorbid and KT to suboptimal recipients is associated with delayed graft function (DGF), prolonged hospitalization, inferior long-term allograft function, and poorer patient survival. In parallel, donors are also older, suffer from several comorbidities, and donations coming from circulatory death (DCD) predominate, which in turn leads to early and late complications. However, it is unclear how donor and recipient risk factors interact., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we assess the impact of a KT from suboptimal donors to suboptimal recipients. We focused on: 1) DGF; 2) hospital stay and number of dialysis days after KT and 3) allograft function at 12 months., Results and Discussion: Among the 369 KT included, the overall DGF rate was 25% ( n  = 92) and median time from reperfusion to DGF resolution was 7.8 days (IQR: 3.0-13.8 days). Overall, patients received four dialysis sessions (IQR: 2-8). The combination of pre-KT anuria (<200 ml/24 h, 32%) and DCD procurement (14%) was significantly associated with DGF, length of hospital stay, and severe perioperative complications, predominantly in recipients 50 years and older., Competing Interests: The author DS declared that he was an editorial board member of Frontiers at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Bocchi, Beldi, Kuhn, Storni, Müller and Sidler.)

This report describes transplantation of liver allograft from a circulatory death donor who was supported by veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ( ECMO) for 14 days and presented with severely altered liver functions. Successful liver transplant was done in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma ( HCC) in the background of primary sclerosing cholangitis. There was immediate graft function and uneventful recovery with stable graft function at 1-year follow-up. This case illustrates the ability of veno-venous ECMO to resuscitate organs in the presence of severe dysfunction, and perhaps, lessons from this case may be incorporated to optimize the condition of organs rescued from these marginal donors and exemplify the use of ECMO in normothermic regional perfusion in donors after circulatory death. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Early hypertransaminasemia after kidney transplantation (KT) is frequent. It has been associated with the crosstalk produced between the liver and the kidney in ischemia-reperfusion situations. However, the influence of the donor type has not been evaluated. We present a retrospective study analyzing the increase in serum aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) during the first three months post-KT in 151 recipients who received thymoglobulin as induction therapy, either from brain-death donors (DBD, n = 75), controlled circulatory death donors (cDCD, n = 33), or uncontrolled DCD (uDCD, n = 43). Eighty-five KT recipients from DBD who received basiliximab were included as controls. From KT recipients who received thymoglobulin, 33.6/43.4% presented with an increase in AST/ALT at 72 h post-KT, respectively. Regarding donor type, the percentage of recipients who experienced 72 h post-KT hypertransaminasemia was higher in uDCD group (65.1/83.7% vs. 20.3/26% in DBD and 20.7/27.6% in cDCD, p < 0.001). Within the control group, 9.4/12.9% of patients presented with AST/ALT elevation. One month after transplant, AST/ALT values returned to baseline in all groups. The multivariate analysis showed that uDCD recipients had 6- to 12-fold higher risk of developing early post-KT hypertransaminasemia. Early post-KT hypertransaminasemia is a frequent and transient event related to the kidney donor type, being more frequent in uDCD recipients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Donors after brain death (DBD) have been the major source of organ donation due to good perfusion of the organs. However, owing to the mismatch in demand and supply of the organ donors and recipients, donors after circulatory death (DCDDs) has increased recently all over the world. Kidneys, liver, and lungs are being used for transplantation from DCDDs. Recently, heart transplantation from DCDDs has been started, which is under the firestorm of scrutiny by the ethicists. The ethical dilemma revolves around the question whether the donors are actually dead when they are declared dead by cardiocirculatory death criteria for organ procurement. The subsequent literature review addresses all the perspectives by differentiating between the donation methods known as DBDs and DCDDs, explaining the implications of the dead-donor rule on the organ donation pool, and categorizing the determinants of death leading to separation of the arguments under the two methods of donations., (Copyright © 2018 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This article summarizes recent knowledge and clinical advances in machine perfusion (MP) of thoracic organs. MP of thoracic organs has gained much attention during the last decade. Clinical studies are investigating the role of MP to preserve, resuscitate, and assess heart and lungs prior to transplantation. Currently, MP of the cardiac allograft is essential in all type DCD heart transplantation while MP of the pulmonary allograft is mandatory in uncontrolled DCD lung transplantation. MP of thoracic organs also offers an exciting platform to further investigate downregulation of the innate and adaptive immunity prior to reperfusion of the allograft in recipients. MP provides a promising technology that allows pre-transplant preservation, resuscitation, assessment, repair, and conditioning of cardiac and pulmonary allografts outside the body in a near physiologic state prior to planned transplantation. Results of ongoing clinical trials are awaited to estimate the true clinical value of this new technology in advancing the field of heart and lung transplantation by increasing the total number and the quality of available organs and by further improving recipient early and long-term outcome., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: D Van Raemdonck was a principal investigator for the Inspire Trial and for the Expand Trial; both trials were sponsored by Transmedics® (Andover, MA, USA). F Rega receives research grants from Medtronic and is a consultant to Atricure Europe (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) and LivaNova Belgium (Zaventem, Belgium). The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) of deceased donor kidneys is associated with a better outcome than static cold storage, predominantly in marginal donors. Nevertheless, there is little evidence supporting whether graft centre of origin and donor category impact HMP results., Objective: To identify factors impacting HMP in transplantation from marginal donors., Design, Setting, and Participants: Analysis of prospectively collected cohort data of expanded criteria donor (ECD) and donor after circulatory death (DCD) categories II and III was performed. A total of 214 adult recipients of first kidney transplantation with complete data and a minimum of 6-mo follow-up were included., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Delayed graft function (DGF) was defined as the lack of decrease in creatinine level in the first 48h. Graft loss was defined as return to dialysis or creatinine clearance <15ml/min/1.73m 2 . Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for DGF were constructed to identify independent risk factors. Recipient and graft survival (GS) analyses were conducted by Kaplan-Meier, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses., Results and Limitation: DGF occurred in 32.8% of imported and 20.5% of local grafts (p=0.059). Only donor category (DCD; odds ratio [OR]: 6.6, p=0.008) and haemodialysis (OR: 3.5, p=0.002) were significantly associated with DGF development. The 1-yr GS rate was 92.5% in the local donor group and 84.3% in the imported donor group (p=0.050). Multivariate analysis by Cox proportional hazards model identified only donor category (hazard ratio [HR] 10.99, p=0.001) and donor age (HR 1.07, p=0.005) as predictive variables for GS. The small sample size of the DCD group diminished the statistical power and did not permit a subgroup analysis to determine the impact of specific DCD category on HMP results., Conclusions: DCD donor category, but not donor centre of origin, impacted DGF development and GS in the HMP of deceased donor kidneys., Patient Summary: Currently, the number of donors is insufficient to meet the demand for renal grafts. Expanded criteria for donation after brain death and donation after circulatory death (DCD) programmes have been developed as strategies to minimise this problem. Hypothermic machine perfusion has previously demonstrated its usefulness in expanded criteria donation and DCD preservation. DCD type and donor age increase the risk of graft loss., (Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The authors discuss the concept of donation after circulatory death (DCD) that provides new potentials for lungs donors and the possibility of reducing the waiting list deaths due to the tragic consequence of the limited brain death donors (BDDs). They cite the study conducted by B. Zych and colleagues that has significantly demonstrated survival outcomes of the concept. Its importance in supporting the notion that DCD donors can provide a safe source of organs is also emphasized.