Search

This study evaluated unexpected dosimetric errors caused by machine control accuracy, patient setup errors, and patient weight changes/internal organ deformations. Trajectory log files for 13 gynecologic plans with seven‐ or nine‐beam dynamic multileaf collimator (MLC) intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and differences between expected and actual MLC positions and MUs were evaluated. Effects of patient setup errors on dosimetry were estimated by in‐house software. To simulate residual patient setup errors after image‐guided patient repositioning, planned dose distributions were recalculated (blurred dose) after the positions were randomly moved in three dimensions 0–2 mm (translation) and 0°–2° (rotation) 28 times per patient. Differences between planned and blurred doses in the clinical target volume (CTV) D98% and D2% were evaluated. Daily delivered doses were calculated from cone‐beam computed tomography by the Hounsfield unit‐to‐density conversion method. Fractional and accumulated dose differences between original plans and actual delivery were evaluated by CTV D98% and D2%. The significance of accumulated doses was tested by the paired t test. Trajectory log file analysis showed that MLC positional errors were −0.01 ± 0.02 mm and MU delivery errors were 0.10 ± 0.10 MU. Differences in CTV D98% and D2% were <0.5% for simulated patient setup errors. Differences in CTV D98% and D2% were 2.4% or less between the fractional planned and delivered doses, but were 1.7% or less for the accumulated dose. Dosimetric errors were primarily caused by patient weight changes and internal organ deformation in gynecologic radiation therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inaccurate assessment of injected drug delivery may increase cost and morbidity or reduce efficacy. Yet currently most injections are evaluated solely by the formation of a visible wheal that might not truly estimate the actual area of effect. We hypothesized that thermal injection measurement (TIM) might verify appropriate temperature at the time of injection, as required for some temperature-sensitive vaccines and provide more accurate information about the area of delivery. 0.1 mL of either iced (n = 11) or room temperature (n = 17) methylene blue solution was injected subcutaneously in mice under anesthesia and photos taken with an iPhone 7 built-in camera and Thermal Seek Camera phone plug-in. After 5 min, true values were determined at necropsy. TIM was closer in value to the measured area at necropsy than the area of the visualized skin wheal at both ice temperature and room temperature. The difference between the true value and thermal area assessment of iced solution averaged 0.15 cm2 as compared with the difference between the true value and wheal size, which averaged 0.27 cm2 (P = 0.04). At room temperature, this was maintained for thermal and visible wheal differences, 0.23 cm2 and 0.65 cm2, respectively (P = 0.0006). TIM can assess temperature at the time of injection and is more accurate than visual inspection. TIM could be applied to colorless injections and areas that are hard to visualize such as scar. As a portable phone plug-in, it might be a useful adjunct to aid the evaluation of injected drug delivery including in resource-limited settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]