Search

Background. Postpartum haemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable maternal mortality worldwide. Early identification and prompt management of postpartum haemorrhage improve outcomes. Objective assessment of postpartum blood loss is an important step in identifying postpartum haemorrhage. The Brass‐V drape and MaternaWell tray have been designed for routine measurement of postpartum blood loss. The perceived utility and acceptability of these devices to the parturients and birth attendants still begged exploring. Objective. To assess the perceived usefulness and ease of use of a Brass‐V drape versus a MaternaWell tray for the collection of postpartum blood loss. Methods. We conducted a prospective parallel randomised trial, employing a questionnaire to assess the experiences of birth attendants and birthing women who used these devices. The study was conducted at site B midwife obstetric unit in Khayelitsha Cape Town. Pregnant women presenting in early labour were approached for voluntary participation. After informed consent was obtained, participants were randomly assigned to the Brass‐V drape or the MaternaWell tray, which the birth attendant placed after the birth of the baby. Results. There were 63 participants, of which 33 were assigned to the MaternaWell tray and 30 to the Brass‐V drape. Birth attendants indicated a desire to use the MaternaWell tray (30 (90%)) or Brass‐V drape (26 (87%)) in future deliveries. The parturients were also in favour of the future use of MaternaWell tray (33 (100%)) and Brass‐V drape (28 (93%)). Ease of measurement favoured the Brass V‐drape, and ease of placement favoured the MaternaWell tray. Five (8%) participants experienced postpartum haemorrhage, two with the MaternaWell tray and three with the Brass‐V drape. One parturient required hospital transfer. Conclusion. The responses of the birth attendants and parturients were positive. The MaternaWell tray has the benefit of reuse and lower cost and is an acceptable alternative to the Brass‐V drape. Both devices aid in the early recognition of postpartum haemorrhage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ectopic pregnancy have reported many different outcomes, which are themselves often defined and measured in distinct ways. This level of variation results in an inability to compare results of individual RCTs. The development of a core outcome set to ensure outcomes important to key stakeholders are collected consistently will guide future research in ectopic pregnancy.Study Aim: To develop and implement a core outcome set to guide future research in ectopic pregnancy.Methods and Analysis: We have established an international steering group of key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, researchers, and individuals with lived experience of ectopic pregnancy. We will identify potential outcomes from ectopic pregnancy from a comprehensive literature review of published randomised controlled trials. We will then utilise a modified Delphi method to prioritise outcomes. Subsequently, key stakeholders will be invited to score potential core outcomes on a nine-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not important) to 9 (critical). Repeated reflection and rescoring should promote whole and individual stakeholder group convergence towards consensus 'core' outcomes. We will also establish standardised definitions and recommend high-quality measurements for individual core outcomes.Trial Registration: COMET 1492 . Registered in November 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Few data are available on COVID-19 outcomes among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where high-risk comorbidities are prevalent. We investigated the impact of pregnancy on SARS-CoV-2 infection and of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy to generate evidence for health policy and clinical practice., Methods: We conducted a 6-country retrospective cohort study among hospitalized women of childbearing age between 1 March 2020 and 31 March 2021. Exposures were (1) pregnancy and (2) a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test. The primary outcome for both analyses was intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Secondary outcomes included supplemental oxygen requirement, mechanical ventilation, adverse birth outcomes, and in-hospital mortality. We used log-binomial regression to estimate the effect between pregnancy and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Factors associated with mortality were evaluated using competing-risk proportional subdistribution hazards models., Results: Our analyses included 1315 hospitalized women: 510 pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2, 403 nonpregnant women with SARS-CoV-2, and 402 pregnant women without SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among women with SARS-CoV-2 infection, pregnancy was associated with increased risk for ICU admission (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.42-4.01), oxygen supplementation (aRR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.44-2.42), and hazard of in-hospital death (adjusted sub-hazard ratio [aSHR]: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.08-3.70). Among pregnant women, SARS-CoV-2 infection increased the risk of ICU admission (aRR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.20-3.35), oxygen supplementation (aRR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.17-2.11), and hazard of in-hospital death (aSHR: 5.03; 95% CI: 1.79-14.13)., Conclusions: Among hospitalized women in SSA, both SARS-CoV-2 infection and pregnancy independently increased risks of ICU admission, oxygen supplementation, and death. These data support international recommendations to prioritize COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. J. B. N. is an infectious disease internist and epidemiologist and Principal Investigator (PI) of NIH/FIC grant numbers 1R25TW011217-01, 1R21TW011706-01, and 1D43TW010937-01A1; and payment to University of Pittsburgh. N. A. S.-A. is a clinician-scientist in Pediatric Infectious Diseases and implementation research; she is supported by the NIH National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) grant number R01HD089866; by an NIH/FIC award through the Adolescent HIV Prevention and Treatment Implementation Science Alliance (AHISA) for the Central and West Africa Implementation Science Alliance (CAWISA) (payment to institution); and by NIH/FIC grant number 1D43TW012280-01. F. S., N. K. S., and A. P. are supported as PIs by NIH/FIC grant number 1R25TW011217-01. A. Z. is PIs of the Pan-African Network on Emerging and Re-Emerging Infections (PANDORA-ID-NET; https://www.pandora-id.net) funded by the European Developing Countries Clinical Trial Partnership (EDCTP) and the European Union Horizon 2020 Framework Program for Research and Innovation, paid to institution (University College London, London, UK). R. N. M. reports grants or contracts unrelated to this work, and payment to their institution: NIH/FIC1D43TW010547-01—The African Center for Biostatistical Excellence (ACBE). P. J. R. reports the following grants or contracts unrelated to this work and paid to their institution: 5R01AI075045-12, 5R01AI139179-04, and 5R01AI117001-07. E. R. S. reports a Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation grant for a prospective meta-analysis of COVID-19 in pregnancy, unrelated to this work, and payment to George Washington University. A. B. reports grants or contracts unrelated to this work—NIH: IMPAACT Vice-chair Funding for P1106; and UNITAID: Benefit KIDS funding for PETITE Study. P. A. reports grants or contracts unrelated to this work and paid to the University of Ibadan, Nigeria: NIH/FIC R25 grant number 1R25TW011217-01 to AFREhealth. J. W. N. reports grants paid to the University of Pittsburgh from the NIH to the Pitt-Ohio State Clinical Trials Unit (UM1 AI068636), the University of Pittsburgh Virology Support Laboratory (UM1 AI106701), the I4C Martin Delaney Collaboratory for an HIV Cure (UM1 AI126603), the REACH Martin Delaney Collaboratory for HIV Cure (UM1 AI164565), and from the National Cancer Institute through Leidos contract numbers HHSN261200800001E and 75N91019D00024 USAID; Gilead Sciences, Inc; and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. J. W. N. also reports consulting fees from Gilead Sciences, Inc (Scientific Advisory Board), Accelevir Diagnostics (Consulting Agreement), and Merck (Consulting Agreement); shares from Abound Bio, Inc, share options from Co-Crystal Pharma, Inc, and share options from Infectious Diseases Connect; a consulting agreement with Xi’an Yufan Biotechnologies; and employment with the University of Pittsburgh. M. S. reports grants or contracts unrelated to this work and paid to their institution (MGH-Boston, MA, USA): NIH/NIA R01AG059504-03 and NIH/NHLBI R01 HL141053-04. A.-P. K. reports research support unrelate to this work paid to their institution (South African Medical Research Council): NIH/FIC 1R21TW011706-01-Dolutegravir, Weight Gain and Metabolic Outcomes in South Africa. L. M. reports consulting fees from the World Health Organization on COVID in pregnancy and mother to child SARS-CoV-2 transmission (this contract is now completed); and payment from Virology Education for a talk on SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy and possibility of mother-to-child SARS-CoV-2 transmission for continuing education sponsored by Virology Education. M. Y. is PI of the NIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIH/NIAID) grant number 5U01AI096299-13 of the Central Africa-International epidemiology to Evaluate AIDS (CA-IeDEA). M. Y. also reports grants or contracts unrelated to this work and paid to their institution: NIH grant numbers 5U01AI096299 (NIAID), R01HD087993 (NICHD), U54CA254568 (National Cancer Institute), and R01HD105526 (NICHD). All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Objective: To describe risk factors and outcomes of pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to South African healthcare facilities., Methods: A population-based cohort study was conducted utilizing an amended International Obstetric Surveillance System protocol. Data on pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalized between April 14, 2020, and November 24, 2020, were analyzed., Results: A total of 36 hospitals submitted data on 673 infected hospitalized pregnant women; 217 (32.2%) were admitted for COVID-19 illness and 456 for other indications. There were 39 deaths with a case fatality rate of 6.3%: 32 (14.7%) deaths occurred in women admitted for COVID-19 illness compared to 7 (1.8%) in women admitted for other indications. Of the women, 106 (15.9%) required critical care. Maternal tuberculosis, but not HIV co-infection or other co-morbidities, was associated with admission for COVID-19 illness. Rates of cesarean delivery did not differ significantly between women admitted for COVID-19 and those admitted for other indications. There were 179 (35.4%) preterm births, 25 (4.7%) stillbirths, 12 (2.3%) neonatal deaths, and 162 (30.8%) neonatal admissions. Neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly from those of infected women admitted for other indications., Conclusion: The maternal mortality rate was high among women admitted with SARS-CoV-2 infection and higher in women admitted primarily for COVID-19 illness with tuberculosis being the only co-morbidity associated with admission., (© 2021 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)