Search

Essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) are Philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) characterized by the JAK2 V617F mutation, which can be found in more than 98% of PV patients and in ∼ 50% of ET patients. Assessment of the JAK2 V617F allele burden by a highly sensitive quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay appears to be a useful tool for monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) and evaluating treatment efficacy. This report expands and substantiates existing data, showing that IFN-alpha2 is a highly potent immunomodulating agent capable of inducing MRD with low-burden JAK2 V617F, major molecular response (MMR), complete hematological remission (CHR) and complete histomorphological normalization of the bone marrow in a sub-set of patients with ET and PV after long-term treatment (≥ 3.5 years). Furthermore, long-lasting hematological, molecular and histomorphological remissions are sustained after discontinuation of IFN-alpha2 for up to ∼ 5–6 years. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The use of epidermal growth factor receptor-targeting antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer has been restricted to patients with wild-type KRAS tumors by the European Medicines Agency since 2008, based on data showing a lack of efficacy and potential harm in patients with mutant KRAS tumors. In an effort to ensure optimal, uniform, and reliable community-based KRAS testing throughout Europe, a KRAS external quality assessment (EQA) scheme was set up. The first large assessment round included 59 laboratories from eight different European countries. For each country, one regional scheme organizer prepared and distributed the samples for the participants of their own country. The samples included unstained sections of 10 invasive colorectal carcinomas with known KRAS mutation status. The samples were centrally validated by one of two reference laboratories. The laboratories were allowed to use their own preferred method for histological evaluation, DNA isolation, and mutation analysis. In this study, we analyze the setup of the KRAS scheme. We analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of the regional scheme organization by analyzing the outcome of genotyping results, analysis of tumor percentage, and written reports. We conclude that only70%of laboratories correctly identified the KRAS mutational status in all samples. Both the false-positive and false-negative results observed negatively affect patient care. Reports of the KRAS test results often lacked essential information. We aim to further expand this program to more laboratories to provide a robust estimate of the quality of KRAS testing in Europe, and provide the basis for remedial measures and harmonization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factorreceptor gene occur as early cancer-driving clonal events in a subset of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and result in increased sensitivity to EGFR-tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Despite very frequent and often prolonged clinical response to EGFR-TKIs, virtually all advanced EGFR-mutated (EGFRM+) NSCLCs inevitably acquire resistance mechanisms and progress at some point during treatment. Additionally, 20–30% of patients do not respond or respond for a very short time (<3 months) because of intrinsic resistance. While several mechanisms of acquired EGFR-TKI-resistance have been determined by analyzing tumor specimens obtained at disease progression, the factors causing intrinsic TKI-resistance are less understood. However, recent comprehensive molecular-pathological profiling of advanced EGFRM+ NSCLC at baseline has illustrated the co-existence of multiple genetic, phenotypic, and functional mechanisms that may contribute to tumor progression and cause intrinsic TKI-resistance. Several of these mechanisms have been further corroborated by preclinical experiments. Intrinsic resistance can be caused by mechanisms inherent in EGFR or by EGFR-independent processes, including genetic, phenotypic or functional tumor changes. This comprehensive review describes the identified mechanisms connected with intrinsic EGFR-TKI-resistance and differences and similarities with acquired resistance and among clinically implemented EGFR-TKIs of different generations. Additionally, the review highlights the need for extensive pre-treatment molecular profiling of advanced NSCLC for identifying inherently TKI-resistant cases and designing potential combinatorial targeted strategies to treat them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is among the most lethal cancers, with a 5-year survival rate of around 9%. Only 20% are candidates for surgery. Most unresectable patients undergo EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosis. Identification of targetable mutations using next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly requested. Data on feasibility of EUS-FNB for NGS and knowledge regarding mutational profile of unresectable PDAC are scarce. We evaluated the "technical yield" of EUS-FNB for NGS in unresectable PDAC: relative fraction of diagnostic EUS-FNBs meeting technical criteria. We also investigated the "molecular yield": relative fraction of EUS-FNBs included in NGS containing sufficient DNA for detection of at least one mutation. Furthermore, we determined the relative frequency of cancer-associated mutations in unresectable PDAC., Patients and Methods: Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded EUS-FNBs diagnostic of unresectable PDAC and fulfilling these criteria were included ( n = 105): minimum 3-mm 2 tissue, minimum of 2-mm 2 tumor area, and minimum 20% relative tumor area. NGS was performed using Ion GeneStudio S5 Prime System and Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay v.3 including 161 cancer-related genes., Results: Technical yield was 48% (105/219) and molecular yield was 98% (103/105). Most frequently mutated genes were KRAS (89.3%) and TP53 (69.9%), followed by CDKN2A (24.3%), ARID1A (9.7%), SMAD4 (7.8%), TSC2 (7.8%), and CCND3 (6.8%)., Conclusion: EUS-FNB for NGS of unresectable PDAC is feasible. Our technical criteria for NGS, using leftovers in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded blocks after routine pathology diagnosis, were met by around half of EUS-FNBs. Almost all EUS-FNBs fulfilling the technical criteria yielded a successful NGS analysis., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no financial conflict of interest with regard to the content of this report., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc on behalf of Scholar Media Publishing.)

We report a case of a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presenting synchronously with a paraganglioma (PGL) in a Whipple reaction specimen. The patient was a 72-year-old female with a history of breast and vulvar cancer. The simultaneous occurrence of two synchronous tumours in the pancreas was striking. Due to the presence of PGL and multiple meta- and synchronous tumours, the patient was referred to genetic counselling. Tumour tissue from the vulvar carcinoma, the PDAC and the PGL was analysed by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 161 cancer-related genes and by whole exome sequencing (WES). Peripheral blood was also examined by NGS and WES. These genetic analyses revealed germline polymorphisms in AXIN2 (NM&#95;004655.4:c 0.2272 G>A; p.Ala758Thr), BRCA2 (NM&#95;000059.3:c.9976 A>T; p.Lys3326Ter), NCOR1 (NM&#95;006311.4:c 0.6544 G>A; p.Ala2182Thr) and SPTA1 (NM&#95;003126.3:c 0.373 G>A; p.Ala125Thr) and somatic mutations of KRAS (NM&#95;033360.3;c 0.35 G>A; p.Gly12Asp) and TP53 (NM&#95;000546.5; c.602delT; p.Leu201CysfsTer46) in the PDAC and of TP53 (NM&#95;000546.5; c 0.733 G>A; p.Gly245Ser) and TERT (NM&#95;198253.2; c.-124 C>T; promotor region) in the vulvar carcinoma. Breast carcinoma tissue was not available for genetic analysis. The results of the genetic analyses did not explain the presence of multiple tumours in this patient, despite a slightly increased risk of breast cancer associated with the identified BRCA2 polymorphism. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the synchronous occurrence of PDAC and PGL. This case emphasizes the importance of thorough macroscopic examination of pancreatic resection specimens, as coexisting neoplasms may otherwise be missed., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.. All rights reserved.)