Search

Sophie le Doré,1 Nathalie Grinda,2 Emmanuelle Ferré,1 Valerie Roussel-Robert,3 Birgit Frotscher,4 Pierre Chamouni,5 Sandrine Meunier,6 Sophie Bayart,7 Edita Dolimier,8 Francoise Truong-Berthoz,9 Emmanuelle de Raucourt1 1Haemophilia Treatment Centre, Hôpital Mignot, Versailles, France; 2Regional Hemophilia Centre, Hôpital de Bicêtre (AP-HP), Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; 3Regional Hemophilia Treatment, Hôpital Cochin (AP-HP) Centre, Paris, France; 4Haemophilia Treatment Centre, Hôpital de Brabois, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France; 5Regional Hemophilia Treatment Centre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, Rouen, France; 6Hospices Civils de Lyon – Unité d’Hémostase Clinique, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Bron, France; 7Haemophilia Treatment Centre, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France; 8Baxalta France SAS, a Takeda Company, Paris, France; 9Baxalta GmbH, a Takeda Company, Zurich, SwitzerlandCorrespondence: Emmanuelle de RaucourtService d’Hématologie Biologique, Clinique des Anticoagulants (CAC), Unité Inserm U 1148, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, FranceTel +33 01 40 87 55 41Fax +33 01 40 87 56 83Email emmanuelle.de-raucourt@aphp.frBackground: Hemophilic arthropathy is a major complication in patients with severe hemophilia. A plastic knee model has been developed for the therapeutic education of patients to promote improved care management and self-treatment skills. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of this hemarthrosis-simulating artificial knee (HSAK) on patients’ knowledge of their disease and its treatment.Methods: In this observational study, the impact of HSAK was assessed during individualized education in patients with severe/moderately severe hemophilia A or B at seven hemophilia treatment centers in France. Participants provided written informed consent and completed questionnaires to assess knowledge of their disease (score range: 0– 7) and knowledge of their treatment (score range: 0– 4). Questionnaires were completed before, immediately after and 6 months after HSAK use. The scores obtained before and after the use of the HSAK were compared.Results: The participants comprised 32 children, 29 teenagers, and 31 adults. The mean (SD) disease knowledge score increased significantly in all age groups of patients from 4.5 (2.0) to 5.9 (1.5; p< 0.001) immediately after the training and remained unchanged at 6 months. Mean (SD) treatment knowledge scores were unchanged, but Wilcoxon signed rank testing showed a significant increase after the training course that was maintained at 6 months in children and teenagers.Conclusion: These findings suggest that an individualized training course can enhance the understanding of hemophilia in patients of all ages, especially in children and teenagers, and that the HSAK may assist in improving patients’ management of their disease.Keywords: hemarthrosis, hemophilia, knee joint, patient education as topic, therapeutic education

Background & Aims: Despite several recent international guidelines, no consensus exists on the bleeding risk nor haemostatic parameter thresholds that define the safety of invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to establish a position paper on the bleeding risk associated with invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis among the experts involved in various guidelines. Methods: All experts involved in recent guidelines on the management of invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis were invited to classify 80 procedures as ''high risk'' or ''low risk'' with respect to bleeding. Procedures were considered high risk when the estimated risk of major bleeding was 1.5% or more, or when even minor bleeding might lead to significant morbidity or death. The experts were also asked to choose safety thresholds for laboratory test values at which elective invasive procedures could be safely performed. The predetermined threshold considered as “consensus” was ≥75% agreement. Results: Fifty-two experts participated in the study. Out of 80 procedures, a consensus opinion was reached for 52 procedures (65%): 17 procedures were classified as “high risk”, primarily interventional endoscopic procedures, percutaneous organ biopsies, or procedures involving the central nervous system; and 35 as “low risk”, primarily “diagnostic” procedures. The lowest platelet counts at which performance of a low-risk procedure or a high-risk procedure/surgery were deemed acceptable were 30 × 109/L and 50 × 109/L, respectively. Experts did not believe that international normalised ratio should be considered before performing low-risk procedures; 71% also indicated that it should not be considered before performing high-risk procedures. Conclusions: This experience-based classification may be helpful to refine future study designs and to guide clinical decision making regarding invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis. Impact and implications: Several risk classifications and management guidelines for invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis have been proposed, but with conflicting recommendations. By providing a position paper, based on the opinion of a broad panel of experts, on the bleeding risk associated with 52 invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis, this survey will help to provide a framework for future study design. The consensus on platelet count, international normalised ratio, fibrinogen and activated partial thromboplastin time identified in this survey will inform physicians regarding the laboratory test values considered acceptable by the experts prior to the performance of an elective invasive procedure in patients with cirrhosis.

Background: Preoperative identification of patients with hemostasis abnormalities leading to an increased bleeding risk is based on routine hemostasis tests: prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and platelet count. Because of their low predictive performance, guidelines recommend replacing them with structured bleeding risk questionnaires, but none is validated in this population., Objectives: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of 3 strategies, performed at the preanesthesia visit before scheduled interventions, and to identify patients with hemostasis abnormalities leading to an increased bleeding risk METHODS: A multicenter study was performed in 7 French academic hospitals, involving patients scheduled for surgical intervention, without antiplatelet/anticoagulant treatment. The 3 strategies consisted of 1-a structured screening questionnaire; 2-PT, APTT, and platelet count ordered in selected patients; and 3-systematic PT, APTT, and platelet count. The reference standard comprised von Willebrand factor activity/antigen, factor (F)VIII, FIX, FXI, platelet function analyzer, and, when required, FII, FV, FX, and FVII and hemostasis consultation., Results: Eighteen (1.2%) of 1484 patients had a hemostasis abnormality leading to an increased bleeding risk according to reference standard. In the overall cohort, sensitivity of the questionnaire-based strategy was 50% (95% CI, 26%-74%; specificity, 87% [95% CI, 85%-88%]); sensitivity was 0% (95% CI, 0%-41%) in men vs 82% (95% CI, 48%-98%) in women. For selective routine tests, sensitivity was 33% (95% CI, 13%-59%) and specificity 97% (95% CI, 96%-98%). Corresponding values for systematic routine tests were 44% (95% CI, 22%-69%) and 93% (95% CI, 91%-94%)., Conclusion: Sensitivity was low for all 3 strategies investigated. The structured screening questionnaire had clinically acceptable diagnostic accuracy only in women., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests There are no competing interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody that mimics the function of factor VIII (FVIII) and is indicated for prophylactic use in patients with congenital hemophilia A with or without inhibitors. Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare and severe disorder causes by autoantibodies that inhibit FVIII. In AHA, acute bleeding are managed with bypassing agents but several reports described the off-label use of emicizumab. The aim of this article is to describe two cases of AHA treated with emicizumab and a review of the scientific littérature. Reports indicate that the use of emicizumab is efficacious to treat acute bleeding with less thrombotic events thant with bypassing agents and with a reduced hospitalisation duration. Nevertheless biological monitoring is more complicated with assay interferences and a persistent circulation more than 6 months after the last injection was observed for our two patients.

Background: Despite the wide use of bleeding scores and the reliability of clotting factor level measurement, bleeding risk stratification before surgery remains challenging in patients with rare inherited bleeding disorders., Objectives: This multicenter observational prospective study assessed in patients with rare coagulation factor deficiency, the perioperative hemostatic management choices by hemostasis experts and the bleeding outcomes after surgery., Methods: One hundred seventy-eight patients with low coagulation activity level (factor [F] II, FV, combined FV-FVIII, FVII, FX, or FXI <50%) underwent 207 surgical procedures. The bleeding outcome, Tosetto's bleeding score, and perioperative hemostatic protocols were collected., Results: Among the 81 procedures performed in patients with severe factor deficiency (level ≤10%), 27 were done without factor replacement (including 6 in patients at high bleeding risk), without any bleeding event. Factor replacement therapy was used mainly for orthopedic procedures. In patients with mild deficiency, 100/126 surgical procedures were carried out without perioperative hemostatic treatment. In patients with FVII or FXI deficiency, factor replacement therapy was in function of the procedure, bleeding risk, and to a lesser extent previous bleeding history. Tranexamic acid was used in almost half of the procedures, particularly in case of surgery in tissues with high fibrinolytic activity (76.8%)., Conclusions: The current perioperative hemostatic management of patients with rare bleeding disorders appears to be adapted. Among the 207 procedures, only 6 were associated with excessive bleeding. Our findings suggest that rather than the bleeding score, factor level and surgery type are the most relevant criteria for perioperative factor replacement therapy., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Introduction: Dominant-negative effects have been described for 10 F11 variants in the literature., Aim: The current study aimed at identifying putative dominant-negative F11 variants., Material and Methods: This research consisted in a retrospective analysis of routine laboratory data., Results: In a series of 170 patients with moderate/mild factor XI (FXI) deficiencies, we identified heterozygous carriers of previously reported dominant-negative variants (p.Ser243Phe, p.Cys416Tyr, and p.Gly418Val) with FXI activities inconsistent with a dominant-negative effect. Our findings also do not support a dominant-negative effect of p.Gly418Ala. We also identified a set of patients carrying heterozygous variants, among which five out of 11 are novel, with FXI activities suggesting a dominant-negative effect (p.His53Tyr, p.Cys110Gly, p.Cys140Tyr, p.Glu245Lys, p.Trp246Cys, p.Glu315Lys, p.Ile421Thr, p.Trp425Cys, p.Glu565Lys, p.Thr593Met, and p.Trp617Ter). However, for all but two of these variants, individuals with close to half normal FXI coagulant activity (FXI:C) were identified, indicating an inconstant dominant effect., Conclusion: Our data show that for some F11 variants recognized has having dominant-negative effects, such effects actually do not occur in many individuals. The present data suggest that for these patients, the intracellular quality control mechanisms eliminate the variant monomeric polypeptide before homodimer assembly, thereby allowing only the wild-type homodimer to assemble and resulting in half normal activities. In contrast, in patients with markedly decreased activities, some mutant polypeptides might escape this first quality control. In turn, assembly of heterodimeric molecules as well as mutant homodimers would result in activities closer to 1:4 of FXI:C normal range., (© 2023 The Authors. Haemophilia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: The rare coagulation disorders may present significant difficulties in diagnosis and management. In addition, considerable inter-individual variation in bleeding phenotype is observed amongst affected individuals, making the bleeding risk difficult to assess in affected individuals. The last international recommendations on rare inherited bleeding disorders (RIBDs) were published by the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors' Organisation in 2014. Since then, new drugs have been marketed, news studies on surgery management in patients with RIBD have been published, and new orphan diseases have been described., Aim: Therefore, the two main objectives of this review, based on the recent recommendations published by the French Reference Centre on Haemophilia and Rare Bleeding Disorders, are: (i) to briefly describe RIBD (clinical presentation and diagnostic work-up) to help physicians in patient screening for the early detection of such disorders; and (ii) to focus on the current management of acute haemorrhages and long term prophylaxis, surgical interventions, and pregnancy/delivery in patients with RIBD., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Hypofibrinogenemia is often associated with excessive bleeding and requires immediate treatment. The qLabs FIB® is a handheld and easy-to-use point-of-care (POC) device designed for the rapid measurement of functional fibrinogen concentration from a single drop of citrated whole blood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analytical performances of the qLabs FIB system. Fibrinogen concentrations from 110 citrated whole blood specimen were measured by both the qLabs FIB and the Clauss laboratory reference methods (STA®-Liquid Fib assay on STA-R® Max from Stago). A three-laboratories comparison study was conducted to assess reproducibility and repeatability of the qLabs FIB using plasma quality control material. In addition, single-site assays were conducted to assess the repeatability from citrated whole blood specimen covering the qLabs FIB reportable range. A very strong correlation between the qLabs FIB and the Clauss laboratory reference method was observed (r = 0.95). Using a clinical cut-off value of 2.0 g/L, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of citrated whole blood was 0.99 and sensibility and specificity were 100 % and 93.5 %, respectively. Percent CVs for reproducibility and repeatability assessed from quality control material, were both <5 %. Repeatability assessed from citrated whole blood specimen showed a CV of 2.6 to 6.5 %. In conclusion, the qLabs FIB system enables a rapid and reliable measurement of functional fibrinogen levels from citrated whole blood and exhibits a strong prediction power at the 2 g/L clinical cut-off when compared to the Clauss laboratory reference. Further clinical studies should demonstrate its ability to quickly confirm the diagnosis of acquired hypofibrinogenemia and help identify patients who may benefit from targeted hemostatic treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Authors affiliated (a, b) are employees from Diagnostica Stago, holding of HemoSonics International which is exclusive distributor of qLabs FIB® system., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Liver biopsy carries a small risk of bleeding complications. No validated clinical or laboratory tool helps predict liver biopsy-related bleeding., Objectives: To determine whether global hemostasis tests and/or a clinical questionnaire could identify patients at risk of liver biopsy-related bleeding., Patients/methods: Consecutive patients scheduled for liver biopsy with an overnight hospital stay were prospectively included. Before liver biopsy, routine hemostasis tests, Platelet Function Analyzer 100, thromboelastometry, thrombin generation assay, plasma clot lysis time, and a clinical questionnaire were performed. Bleeding was defined as a liver hematoma or new free fluid on a systematic ultrasound performed 24 h after liver biopsy or a decrease in hemoglobin level of 2 g/dL or more in patients with pre-existing free fluid in the abdominal cavity., Results: Three hundred two patients were included: 173 underwent percutaneous and 129 transjugular liver biopsy. There were 21 bleeding episodes (7%); 20 based on ultrasonographic criteria, 1 on laboratory criteria. None of the hemostasis tests and no item of the clinical questionnaire were associated with liver biopsy-related bleeding in the overall study group. Same results were obtained in subgroup analyses focusing on patients who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy, transjugular liver biopsy, or on patients with cirrhosis. Pain 2 h after liver biopsy was more frequent in patients with liver biopsy-related bleeding (55% vs. 23% p = .002)., Conclusions: An extensive hemostasis workup, including global hemostasis assays, does not improve prediction of liver biopsy-related bleeding. Pain 2 h after liver biopsy should alert the clinician to the possibility of procedure-related bleeding., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

BACKGROUND: In patients with noncirrhotic chronic portal vein thrombosis (PVT), the benefit of long-term anticoagulation is unknown. We assessed the effects of rivaroxaban on the risk of venous thromboembolism and portal hypertension-related bleeding in such patients. METHODS: In this multicenter, controlled trial, we randomly assigned patients with noncirrhotic chronic PVT without major risk factors for thrombosis to receive either rivaroxaban 15 mg/day or no anticoagulation. The primary end point was 2-year thrombosis-free survival. Secondary end points included the occurrence of site-specific thromboses and major bleeding events. RESULTS: A total of 111 participants were enrolled in the trial, with a mean age of 50.4±13.2 years; 58% of participants were men. An unplanned interim analysis was requested by the independent data safety monitoring board (DSMB) after 10 thrombotic events occurred. The thrombosis incidence rate was 0 per 100 person-years in the rivaroxaban group and 19.71 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval, 7.49 to 31.92) in the no anticoagulation group (log-rank P=0.0008) after a median follow-up of 11.8 months. Based on the interim analysis, the DSMB recommended switching patients from the no anticoagulation group to anticoagulation. After a median follow-up of 30.3 months (intraquartile range, 24.3 to 47.8), major bleeding occurred in two patients receiving rivaroxaban and in one patient not receiving anticoagulation. No deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: After a median follow-up of 11.8 months, among patients with noncirrhotic chronic PVT without major risk factors for thrombosis, daily rivaroxaban reduced the incidence of venous thromboembolism and did not increase major bleeding events. (Funded by grants from the French Ministry of Health and the Association de Malades des Vaisseaux du foie; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02555111.)