Search

Copyright of Direito e Práxis is the property of Editora da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EdUERJ) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Direito GV is the property of Fundacao Getulio Vargas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Direito e Práxis is the property of Editora da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EdUERJ) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Assuming that the law, as a discursive power field, assign and imputes differences that creates hierarchies and asymmetries in sexed bodies as female or male, the article problematize legal systems as mechanisms wich produce and represent subjects. The object of analysis were the speeches of 252 cases of torture suffered by women recorded in the Supreme Military Court, at the military audits, between the years 1964 and 1979. The mediation of power that was built between the accounts and discursive records in inquests revealed the production of a vectored legal discourse that seeks to represent and build as victims women raped in their conditions of “honest” and “caregivers”. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]