Search

As a developing region, Latin America faces unique cancer control and prevention challenges, which are intensified when considering rare cancers, including sarcomas. Sarcomas are a group of malignancies that arise in the connective tissues of the body-such as muscle, fat, nerves, blood vessels, and bones-accounting for a diverse range of tumours that, although rare, require specialized attention. Sarcoma care and research in Latin America require a comprehensive approach that includes deeper epidemiologic knowledge, diagnostic capacity building, access to innovative treatments, increased patient advocacy, and strengthening of clinical research capacity. This article will review current challenges and opportunities for treating patients with sarcoma in Latin America and outline a pathway toward improvement for regional collaborative groups., Competing Interests: RCP: has received consulting fees from Bayer, Servier, Astellas for participation in advisory boards. He also received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus for Bayer, Servier, Pfizer, Amgen, BMS, Merck, and Knight Therapeutics. He also received Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Astrazeneca. In addition, he serves as Chair of the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) Sarcoma group and Member of the Sociedade Brasileira de Oncologia Clínica (SBOC) Sarcoma Committee. BBLD: has received Consulting fees and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from DECIPHERA PHARMACEUTICALS. She also reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from PTC THERAPEUTICS and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM. She also reports Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid from: ESMO GLOBAL POLICY COMMITTEE; BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF MEDICAL ONCOLOGY—SARCOMA BRANCH; EUROPEAN CANCER ORGANIZATION—YOUNG PROFESSIONALS GROUP. VP: none. RRM: has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Knight Therapeutics. He also reports Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Boehringer (Advisory role). In addition, he is the President/Founder of Grupo Brasileiro de Sarcomas. CALM: has received Consuling fees from BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM, SERVIER, and ADDIUM. He also reports Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from SERVIER and ADDIUM (SPEAKER HONORARIA). In addition, he reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM, and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM, SERVIER and ADDIUM. MLGD: has received grants or contracts from any entity from ASCO-PFIZER GRANT (PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR). JCHV: none. MLZ: has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Biotoscana, BMS, Boheringer, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi. He also reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Biotoscana, BMS, Boheringer, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Merck-Serono. CLCM: has received consulting fees, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from MSD and ASTRAZENECA, reports Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from MSD and ASTRAZENECA, and has received consulting fees from MSD and ASTRAZENECA. He also reports Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Astrazeneca. MC: has received Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Novartis, BMS, elea phoenix, MSD. He also reports Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Bayer. RS: none. RJG: none., (© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background and Purpose: Optimal treatment of extremity soft tissue sarcomas (ESTS) is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) plus concomitant hypofractionated RT (hypo-RT) in local and distant disease relapse. Here we report safety, feasibility and early outcomes., Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, single arm study with a goal accrual of 70 patients. Between 2015 and 2018, 18 patients with histologically confirmed nonmetastatic ESTS were assigned to receive doxorubicin and ifosfamide for three neoadjuvant cycles, concomitant with hypo-RT (25 Gy in 5 fractions) followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes were pathologic response, wound complications (WC), and morbidity rates., Results: Median follow-up was 29 months. At last follow-up, 13/18 patients were alive without evidence of local or systemic disease (DFS 72%), 1 had died due to metastatic disease, and 3 were alive with distant metastasis. One patient presented with local relapse within the irradiated field. Mean DFS time was 48.6 months (95% CI: 37.3-59.9). Six patients (33%) had no residual viable tumor detected in pathologic specimens (3 of these myxoid liposarcomas). There was a significant difference in WC among patients with acute RT skin toxicity. Six patients (33%) developed major WC. No grade 3 or 4 ChT adverse events were reported., Conclusion: Despite the limited sample size, these early outcomes demonstrate that this treatment regimen is feasible and well tolerated with high rates of limb preservation, local control, and pathologic complete response, supporting further investigation in a multi-institutional setting., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02812654; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02812654., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The COVID-19 outbreak has resulted in collision between patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and those with cancer on different fronts. Patients with cancer have been impacted by deferral, modification, and even cessation of therapy. Adaptive measures to minimize hospital exposure, following the precautionary principle, have been proposed for cancer care during COVID-19 era. We present here a consensus on prioritizing recommendations across the continuum of sarcoma patient care., Material and Methods: A total of 125 recommendations were proposed in soft-tissue, bone, and visceral sarcoma care. Recommendations were assigned as higher or lower priority if they cannot or can be postponed at least 2-3 months, respectively. The consensus level for each recommendation was classified as "strongly recommended" (SR) if more than 90% of experts agreed, "recommended" (R) if 75%-90% of experts agreed and "no consensus" (NC) if fewer than 75% agreed. Sarcoma experts from 11 countries within the Sarcoma European-Latin American Network (SELNET) consortium participated, including countries in the Americas and Europe. The European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of clinical benefit scale was applied to systemic-treatment recommendations to support prioritization., Results: There were 80 SRs, 35 Rs, and 10 NCs among the 125 recommendations issued and completed by 31 multidisciplinary sarcoma experts. The consensus was higher among the 75 higher-priority recommendations (85%, 12%, and 3% for SR, R, and NC, respectively) than in the 50 lower-priority recommendations (32%, 52%, and 16% for SR, R, and NC, respectively)., Conclusion: The consensus on 115 of 125 recommendations indicates a high-level of convergence among experts. The SELNET consensus provides a tool for sarcoma multidisciplinary treatment committees during the COVID-19 outbreak., Implications for Practice: The Sarcoma European-Latin American Network (SELNET) consensus on sarcoma prioritization care during the COVID-19 era issued 125 pragmatical recommendations distributed as higher or lower priority to protect critical decisions on sarcoma care during the COVID-19 pandemic. A multidisciplinary team from 11 countries reached consensus on 115 recommendations. The consensus was lower among lower-priority recommendations, which shows reticence to postpone actions even in indolent tumors. The European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit scale was applied as support for prioritizing systemic treatment. Consensus on 115 of 125 recommendations indicates a high level of convergence among experts. The SELNET consensus provides a practice tool for guidance in the decisions of sarcoma multidisciplinary treatment committees during the COVID-19 outbreak., (© 2020 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press.)

The use of poorly treated water in hemodialysis centers may lead to fungal contamination, which poses a serious threat to immunologically debilitated hemodialysis patients. This study aimed to isolate and identify yeast species in the water of a Brazilian hemodialysis center by using classic microbiological techniques and Raman spectroscopy. For 12 months, a total of 288 water samples were collected from different points of the hemodialysis treatment distribution center. One hundred and forty-six yeast species were isolated and identified in the samples that tested positive for the presence of yeasts such as Candida parapsilosis (100 isolates, or 68.50%), C. guilliermondii (17 isolates, or 11.65%), Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (23 isolates, or 15.75%), R. glutinis (three isolates, or 2.05%), and Trichosporon inkin (three isolates, or 2.05%). Yeast susceptibility to the antifungal fluconazole was also assayed. Only two C. guilliermondii isolates were resistant to fluconazole: the minimal inhibitory concentrations were higher than 64 μg/mL. The different yeast species present in the water of a Brazilian hemodialysis center call for more effective water disinfection procedures in this unit. Raman spectroscopy is an excellent tool to identify yeast species and is potentially applicable in routine water monitoring in hemodialysis units.

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer worldwide. New prognostic markers are needed to identify patients with poorer prognosis, and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) seem to be promising to accomplish this., Patients and Methods: A prospective study was conducted by blood collection from patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC), three times, every 2 months in conjunction with image examinations for evaluation of therapeutic response. CTC isolation and counting were performed by Isolation by Size of Epithelial Tumor Cells (ISET)., Results: A total of 54 patients with mCRC with a mean age of 57.3 years (31-82 years) were included. Among all patients, 60% (n=32) were carriers of wild-type KRAS (WT KRAS ) tumors and 90% of them (n=29) were exposed to monoclonal antibodies along with systemic treatment. Evaluating CTC kinetics, when we compared the baseline (pretreatment) CTC level (CTC1) with the level at first follow-up (CTC2), we observed that CTC1-positive patients (CTCs above the median), who became negative (CTCs below the median) had a favorable evolution (n=14), with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.7 months. This was higher than that for patients with an unfavorable evolution (CTC1- that became CTC2+; n=13, 6.9 months; P =0.06). Patients with WT KRAS with favorable kinetics had higher PFS (14.7 months) in comparison to those with WT KRAS with unfavorable kinetics (9.4 months; P =0.02). Moreover, patients whose imaging studies showed radiological progression had an increased quantification of CTCs at CTC2 compared to those without progression ( P =0.04)., Conclusion: This study made possible the presentation of ISET as a feasible tool for evaluating CTC kinetics in patients with mCRC, which can be promising in their clinical evaluation., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Background: Identify in advance responder patients to chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) would allow prompt interruption of ineffective therapies in non-responder patients. Hence, predictive markers are sought in numerous trials to detect responder patients, including tumor shrinkage measured by imaging methods. Usually, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is used to evaluate tumor response in metastatic CRC, but these criteria are questionable with use of biological agents associated to chemotherapy. Our aim was correlate early metabolic response by (18)F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ((18)FDG-PET-CT) with long-term outcome in metastatic CRC in first-line therapy., Methods: We prospectively evaluated 36 patients with metastatic CRC in first-line treatment with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin (folinic acid), oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin (folinic acid), irinotecan (FOLFIRI) associated with cetuximab or bevacizumab. (18)FDG-PET-CT was performed at baseline and after two cycles of chemotherapy. The early metabolic response [standardized uptake value (SUV)] was measured to identify responder and non-responder patients and correlated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Median age was 58.5 years (range, 41-74 years). PFS was 15.5 months for responder and 13.3 months for non-responder (P=0.42), OS was 55.7 months for responder and not reached for non-responder. There was no correlation between delta-SUV and clinical and pathological variables analyzed. In the subgroup of patients who did not undergo resection of metastasis (45%), PFS was higher for responders (15.3×6.8 months, P=0.02)., Conclusions: According to our findings, early response by (18)FDG-PET-CT was not a predictor of long-term outcome for patients with metastatic CRC treated in the first-line chemotherapy with a monoclonal antibody.

Background: Although the standard of care after recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is chemotherapy, increasing data suggest that combining cytoreductive surgery with intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a promising option for patients with recurrent EOC. Our aim was to determine the prognostic value of the addition of HIPEC to secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCR) in recurrent EOC., Methods: We analyzed a series of 79 patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC who were treated from May 2000 to January 2014. Fifty patients who underwent SCR were compared to 29 who had SCR in combination with HIPEC., Results: The SCR group had a higher median age (58.4 years) compared to the SCR + HIPEC group (51.6 years) (p = 0.006). The median hospital stay length was longer for SCR + HIPEC versus SCR patients (11 and 8 days, respectively; p = 0.009). More subjects experienced National Cancer Institute grade III-IV morbidity in the SCR + HIPEC group (34.5 %) compared to the SCR group (10.6 %) (p = 0.015). Conversely, there were no deaths in the SCR + HIPEC group and 2 (4.0 %) deaths the SCR group. The median disease-free survival did not differ between SCR and SCR + HIPEC patients (18.6 and 15.8 months, respectively; p = 0.82); nor did median overall survival (59.3 and 58.3 months, respectively; p = 0.95). The presence of carcinomatosis was the only variable that remained linked to a higher risk of recurrence and death in the multivariate analysis., Conclusions: Our data suggest that the addition of HIPEC to cytoreduction in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive EOC does not improve survival.

Introduction: Mutations in KRAS and NRAS genes are negative predictors of anti-EGFR therapies response in metastatic colorectal cancer. There are few reports on RAS testing in synchronous primary colorectal cancer (SP-CRC) and a lack of recommendations on which tissue should be tested for the mutation in this disease. This study analyzed the RAS status of both lesions in SP-CRC patients and in their metastasis., Materials and Methods: DNA was obtained from formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded tissue, and mutations were analyzed by pyrosequencing., Results: RAS status was heterogeneous in 6 (75%) of 8 SP-CRC patients between primary lesions. Five showed heterogeneity regarding RAS mutational status, and from these, four presented with metastasis: 3 cases (75%) had WT metastatic tissue, and 1 case (25%) had mutated metastatic tissue. One patient showed divergence regarding RAS mutation type., Discussion: RAS mutations vary significantly between SP-CRC lesions, and the status of the metastasis is unpredictable. Testing for RAS mutations in only 1 of the primary lesions can misguide clinical decisions and hind the predictive potential of anti-EGFR treatment. A more appropriate approach in metastatic SP-CRC is to test the metastatic tissue or both primary lesions for providing more accurate mutation scenery and support more assertive clinical decisions.

Seven new species of the Culicoides reticulatus species group are described and illustrated based on specimens from Colombia, Panama and Brazilian states of northern (Amazonas, Pará and Roraima) and southeast region (Rio de Janeiro). The new species are compared with their similar congener, Culicoides reticulatus Lutz, and a systematic key, table with numerical characters to the females of the species are provided. Redescription of Culicoides reticulatus Lutz is given based on type series deposited in the Ceratopogonidae Collection of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Brazil. The distribution of these species is presented in figure 9.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma can be classified into two prognostically distinct subgroups with germinal center B-cell-like (CG) and activated B-cell-like (post-CG) characteristics, based on CD10, BCL-6, and MUM1 expression. We performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical variables of 37 patients with primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma and the expression of BCL-6 and MUM1 in 22 patients with available tissue. The median age was 30 years, and 70% of the patients were female. BCL-6 and MUM1 were expressed in 64% and 45% of cases, respectively. Five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 47% and 81%, respectively. In univariate analysis, complete response (p = 0.0001), radiation therapy (p = 0.01), International Prognostic Index (p = 0.001), and MUM1 expression (p = 0.002) correlated with OS. For this group of patients with homogeneous clinical characteristics, response to initial chemotherapy and MUM1 expression were associated with prognosis.

There are few data that show pathologic complete response (pCR) to imatinib treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). We describe a case of a patient with pCR of a pelvic, locally advanced, high-risk GIST who was treated with neoadjuvant imatinib and ultimately underwent a conservative procedure. A 48-year-old male presented with a pelvic mass 10 cm in diameter. Biopsy revealed a gastrointestinal stromal tumor of rectal origin. Although it was considered initially resectable, an extensive procedure would have been necessary for complete resection. Treatment with imatinib was initiated, resulting in partial response. The patient remained on imatinib for over 15 months, maintaining stable disease. Radical prostatectomy with anal sphincter preservation was performed. Pathological report revealed no viable neoplastic cells. The use of imatinib was held for 6 months after the surgery. At a follow-up 15 months after surgery, the patient had no evidence of disease. Our report may help to guide future studies of neoadjuvant imatinib for large pelvic or rectum GISTs that are initially considered unresectable.

Purpose: Gold standard treatment for invasive penile carcinoma remains amputation and lymphadenectomy. This procedure has high morbidity and new prognostic factors on the incidence of metastasis would help select candidates to lymphadenectomy. Mutations in the p53 gene common in several neoplasms can be related to the prognosis. We studied 82 patients with penile carcinoma staged according to the 1978 TNM system who underwent amputation and bilateral lymphadenectomy to evaluate the prognostic value of immunohistochemical p53 staining in the primary tumor., Materials and Methods: Immunoreactivity of p53 was studied with other clinicopathological variables, including patient age, stage, histological grade, tumor thickness, lymphatic and venous embolization, corpora cavernosa, corpus spongiosum and urethral infiltration, and human papillomavirus (HPV) status. We also determined its association with lymph node metastasis, the survival rate and the risk of death. In addition, we studied the association of p53 and HPV DNA with prognosis. All slides were reviewed by 1 pathologist. HPV DNA was detected by polymerase chain reaction using GP5/6+ generic primers. p53 expression was measured by immunohistochemical testing with monoclonal Clone DO-7 mouse anti-human p53 protein antibody (Dako A/S, Glostrup, Denmark). The Cox regression hazards method was used for multifactorial analysis., Results: Nuclear accumulation of p53 was detected in 34 of 82 samples (41.5%). Clinical lymph node N stage (p = 0.045), lymphatic (p <0.001) and venous (p = 0.04) embolization by neoplastic cells, p53 positivity (p = 0.012) and p53 grade (p = 0.004) were significantly associated with lymph node metastasis. Followup was 0.1 to 453 months (mean 88.7). Multivariate analysis revealed that only lymphatic embolization (relative risk 9.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8 to 31.6) and p53 positivity (relative risk 4.8, 95% CI 1.6 to 14.9) were independent factors for lymph node metastasis. Patients with negative p53 had significantly better 5 and 10-year overall survival than those in whom tumors stained positive for p53 (64.5% and 54.6% versus 30.2% and 26.4%, respectively, p = 0.009). When tumors were p53 positive and HPV DNA positive, overall survival was worse. Multivariate analysis revealed that only age (relative risk 2.9, 95% CI 1.6 to 5.1) and lymph node metastasis (relative risk 3.2, 95% CI 1.8 to 5.8) were independent risk factors for death., Conclusions: Immunoreactivity of p53 is an independent factor for lymph node metastasis. The association of positive p53 with positive HPV DNA was related to a worse prognosis.