Search

Copyright of Prisma Jurídico is the property of Nove de Julho University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Se trata de una investigación sobre el sistema jurídico europeo, en particular, sobre la relación entre el discurso constitucional sobre la democracia y la protección de los derechos humanos a partir de un análisis socioeconómico del derecho. Así, como objetivos principales, reflejan dos preguntas: ¿cuál es la relación entre el orden constitucional y el surgimiento de políticas económicas en las sociedades democráticas contemporáneas?y ¿cómo y en qué medida contribuye el diseño constitucional a las políticas económicas en los estados democráticos liberales contemporáneos? Así, basándose en el método de investigación deductivo hipotético, se hizo necesario comprender el dominio ideacional-discursivo de discursos, paradigmas e interpretaciones en competencia de un estado ideal, donde el argumento de que las democracias socioeconómicas emergen porque una coalición de actores que promueven la comprensión neoliberal de la constitución se ha apoderado de este dominio discursivo de interpretación constitucional, tanto en el aparato estatal como en la esfera pública. Así, entre las principales conclusiones de esta investigación, aparece que la crisis de la representación democrática y su relación con la concepción constitucional representan aspectos ideacionales y materialistas, es decir, los economistas promueven, refuerzan y sostienen interpretaciones y discursos constitucionales que ellos mismos utilizan y que reforzar la lógica política de la acumulación oligárquica de riqueza y al mismo tiempo suprimir las políticas de disidencia pacífica y justicia distributiva. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is possible to notice the increase in popular demonstrations in disagreement with decisions taken by the Constitutional Court, giving rise to the so-called backlash effect. Therefore, an analysis of its intentions and effects is necessary, in order to verify, through the hypothetical-deductive method, if it represents a greater popular participation, desirable in a democracy, or if it is a symptom of a systematic anomaly. It is concluded that it represents the effect of the jettisoning of the people in the mechanisms of democracy, so that it is forced to react, not forgetting the problems of the popular will itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas is the property of Revista Brasileira de Politicas Publicas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Quaestio Iuris (QI) is the property of Editora da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EdUERJ) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Current paper discusses the limits of parents' authority on the rights of the person in the family, based on the present constitutional and democratic scenario, with the inclusion of difficulties within the digital conditions of the Internet. Research discusses parents' authority on the rights of young people within the background of the digital age and distancing of the parents within the context of children's almost total immersion in the Internet. A bibliographic investigation, through the deductive method, was employed to perceive the limits and possibilities of the theme. Current paper approaches parents' authority and current family model and its relationship with family authority, the rights of the person and the limits and possibilities of parents' authority within the current model of a democratic and constitutional family. Results show that, although rights may be removed, since they are not absolute, the best path for conviviality within such dichotomy is dialogue and education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental is the property of Universitat Rovira I Virgili and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The rights of the person are crucial for human dignity since they enhance people's abilities. However, they overlook the right to a proper home and subsequent interference in children's and adolescents' development. Studies have linked the right to a home to the rights of the person, but failed to focus on the Child and Adolescent Statute with regard to the concept of a proper home. Current analysis investigates the right to a home within the Statute and the ways the ineffectiveness of the right of a home represents a violation of the rights of the person and in the healthy growth of children and adolescents. The deductive method is employed so that the home premise may be investigated within the rights of the person and human fulfillment. Home is a right implicitly acknowledged by the Child and Adolescent Statute. Its full achievement protects the right to life, health, intimacy, personal integrity and freedom. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]