1. The M184V mutation in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) conferring lamivudine resistance does not result in broad cross-resistance to nucleoside analogue RT inhibitors
- Author
-
P. R. Harrigan, R Pauwels, S Staszewski, Miller, Kurt Hertogs, S. D. Kemp, Stuart Bloor, B. A. Larder, Martin Stürmer, de Béthune Mp, and Gröschel B
- Subjects
Anti-HIV Agents ,Immunology ,HIV Infections ,Biology ,Cohort Studies ,Zidovudine ,Zalcitabine ,Methionine ,immune system diseases ,Abacavir ,medicine ,Immunology and Allergy ,Humans ,Point Mutation ,Didanosine ,Nucleoside analogue ,Stavudine ,virus diseases ,Lamivudine ,Drug Resistance, Microbial ,Valine ,Resistance mutation ,Virology ,Dideoxynucleosides ,Drug Resistance, Multiple ,HIV Reverse Transcriptase ,Infectious Diseases ,HIV-1 ,Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors ,Drug Therapy, Combination ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Objective: To investigate the prevalence and magnitude of M 184 V-mediated changes in susceptibility to zalcitabine, didanosine, stavudine and abacavir (1592U89 succinate) in a cohort of lamivudine-treated patients. Design and methods: A total of 255 samples from patients treated with lamivudine and zidovudine with or without other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) were analysed for susceptibility to zidovudine, lamivudine, zalcitabine, didanosine and stavudine using a recombinant virus assay. Seventy-three samples originated from patients exposed to zidovudine and lamivudine only. A subset of 27 samples was investigated for cross-resistance to abacavir. Resistance was defined as a change in median inhibitory concentration more than fivefold compared with wild-type (high-level resistance, > 10-fold). A genotypic analysis of plasma-derived reverse transcriptase coding regions was carried out in samples with cross-resistance. Results: The majority of samples displayed wild-type or greater than wild-type sensitivity to zalcitabine, didanosine and stavudine: resistance was seen in 17.2, 9 and 6.3% of the total sample population, respectively. Of these, 1.2, 2.7 and 2.4%, respectively, showed high-level resistance. The prevalence of resistance to a particular NRTI was lower in samples from patients not pretreated with that NRTI and in samples from patients exposed to zidovudine-lamivudine only. Cross-resistance was more prevalent in samples with high ZDV resistance. There was no obvious correlation between cross-resistance and genotype; all but two samples were mutant at codon 184. There were no consistent changes at positions associated with zidovudine resistance. The majority of samples from a subset (n = 27) were four- to eightfold less sensitive to abacavir. There were no other genotypic changes in addition to M 184 V known to be associated with abacavir resistance. Conclusions: Cross-resistance was not commonly observed in this lamivudine-treated cohort. M 184 V per se is not expected to compromise subsequent treatment with NRTI such as didanosine-stavudine or combinations containing abacavir.
- Published
- 1998