1. Wood Basic Density in Large Trees: Impacts on Biomass Estimates in the Southwestern Brazilian Amazon.
- Author
-
Romero, Flora Magdaline Benitez, de Nazaré Oliveira Novais, Thais, Jacovine, Laércio Antônio Gonçalves, Bezerra, Eronildo Braga, de Castro Lopes, Rosana Barbosa, de Holanda, Juliana Sousa, Reyna, Edi Flores, and Fearnside, Philip Martin
- Subjects
WOOD density ,DENSITY ,FOREST biomass ,FOREST density ,BIOMASS ,WOOD - Abstract
Wood basic density (WD) plays a crucial role in estimating forest biomass; moreover, improving wood-density estimates is needed to reduce uncertainties in the estimates of tropical forest biomass and carbon stocks. Understanding variations in this density along the tree trunk and its impact on biomass estimates is underexplored in the literature. In this study, the vertical variability of WD was assessed along the stems of large trees that had a diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 50 cm from a dense ombrophilous forest on terra firme (unflooded uplands) in Acre, Brazil. A total of 224 trees were sampled, including 20 species, classified by wood type. The average WD along the stem was determined by the ratio of oven-dry mass to saturated volume. Five models were tested, including linear and nonlinear ones, to fit equations for WD, selecting the best model. The variation among species was notable, ranging from 0.288 g cm
−3 (Ceiba pentandra, L., Gaertn) to 0.825 g cm−3 (Handroanthus serratifolius, Vahl., S. Grose), with an average of 0.560 g cm−3 (±0.164, standard deviation). Significant variation was observed among individuals, such as in Schizolobium parahyba var. amazonicum (H. ex D.), which ranged from 0.305 to 0.655 g cm−3 . WD was classified as low (≤0.40 g cm−3 ), medium (0.41–0.60 g cm−3 ), and high (≥0.61 g cm−3 ). The variability in WD along the stem differs by wood type. In trees with low-density wood, density shows irregular variation but tends to increase along the stem, whereas it decreases in species with medium- and high-density wood. The variation in WD along the stem can lead to underestimations or overestimations, not only in individual trees and species but also in total stocks when estimating forest biomass. Not considering this systematic bias results in significant errors, especially in extrapolations to vast areas, such as the Amazon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF