Search

Since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 variants capable of breakthrough infections have attracted global attention. These variants have significant mutations in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein and the membrane (M) protein, which may imply an enhanced ability to evade immune responses. In this study, an examination of co-mutations within the spike RBD and their potential correlation with mutations in the M protein was conducted. The EVmutation method was utilized to analyze the distribution of the mutations to elucidate the relationship between the mutations in the spike RBD and the alterations in the M protein. Additionally, the Sequence-to-Sequence Transformer Model (S2STM) was employed to establish mapping between the amino acid sequences of the spike RBD and M proteins, offering a novel and efficient approach for streamlined sequence analysis and the exploration of their interrelationship. Certain mutations in the spike RBD, G339D-S373P-S375F and Q493R-Q498R-Y505, are associated with a heightened propensity for inducing mutations at specific sites within the M protein, especially sites 3 and 19/63. These results shed light on the concept of mutational synergy between the spike RBD and M proteins, illuminating a potential mechanism that could be driving the evolution of SARS-CoV-2.

Background: TP53 is a frequently mutated oncogene within non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinical and prognostic significance of co-mutations in TP53 in patients with advanced NSCLC has not been fully elucidated. Methods: A total of 174 patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled in this study. All patients were subjected to sequencing analysis of tumor-related genes and information such as PD-L1 expression, TMB, and co-mutation changes were collected. Patients were categorized into TP53 mutant and TP53 wild-type groups according to their TP53 mutation status and then statistically analyzed. Results: TP53 mutations were the most common among all patients, accounting for 56.32%, followed by epidermal growth factor receptor mutations at 48.27%. The most common mutation sites in the TP53 mutation group were exons 5–8.TP53 mutations were significantly associated with PD-L1 and TMB levels. Univariate Cox analysis showed that gender and EGFR mutation affected the prognosis of TP53-mutated NSCLC patients, and multivariate Cox regression analysis identified EGFR mutation as an independent risk factor. The OS of NSCLC patients in the TP53 mutation group was significantly shorter than that of the TP53wt group. Survival curves in the TP53/EGFR combined mutation group showed that patients with combined EGFR mutation had a lower survival rate. Discussion: TP53 mutations are associated with different clinical indicators and have important implications in clinical treatment. TP53 is a poor prognostic factor for NSCLC patients, and TP53/EGFR co-mutation will affect the survival time of patients. TP53/EGFR co-mutation may be a new prognostic marker for NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Co-occurring mutations in pairs of genes can pinpoint clinically relevant subgroups of cancer. Most colorectal cancers (CRCs) are microsatellite stable (MSS) and have few frequent mutations. Large patient cohorts and broad genomic coverage are needed for comprehensive co-mutation profiling. Methods: Co-mutations were identified in a population-based Swedish cohort analyzed by whole-genome sequencing (n=819 stage I-IV MSS CRCs). Prognostic value was further evaluated in a publicly available dataset of clinically sequenced metastatic CRCs (MSK-IMPACT; n=934 MSS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses with clinicopathological parameters were performed for locoregional (stage I-III) and metastatic (stage IV and recurrent) cancers separately. Results: Prevalent co-mutations were detected in 23 unique gene pairs, 20 of which included APC, TP53, KRAS and/or PIK3CA. Several co-mutations involving APC were associated with good overall survival in locoregional CRC, including APC-TCF7L2 (multivariable HR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.89). This co-mutation was prognostic also in metastatic cancers (multivariable HR: 0.49 and 0.37, 95% CI: 0.24-0.98 and 0.17-0.82 in the Swedish and MSK cohorts, respectively). APC-SOX9 co-mutations were mutually exclusive with APC-TCF7L2, and the co-mutations combined had stronger prognostic associations than APC alone in both metastatic cohorts. BRAF p.V600E-RNF43 co-mutations were associated with poor overall and recurrence-free survival in locoregional CRC (multivariable HR: 4.13 and 3.2, 95% CI: 1.78-9.54 and 1.53-8.04, respectively). Conclusions: We report a genome-wide evaluation of co-occurring mutations in MSS CRCs, and suggest that co-mutations can improve the prognostic stratification compared to single mutations alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary To assess the relevance of co‐occurring somatic mutations in TP53‐mutated myeloid neoplasms with ≥10% blasts, we pooled 325 individuals from 10 centres. We focused on comparing three published somatic co‐alteration signatures comprising (1) nine MDS‐related genes (‘ICC‐MDSR’), (2) ICC‐MDSR + additional secondary mutations‐related genes (‘Tazi signature’) and (3) EPI6 (comprising six genes). Outcomes examined were 24‐month overall survival (OS24) and front‐line complete response (CR1). The median age was 69 years with 77% receiving front‐line hypomethylating agents (HMA). All three signatures ICC‐MDSR (p = 0.009), Tazi signature (p = 0.001) and EPI6 (p = 0.025) predicted inferior CR1. In the low‐intensity (HMA) subgroup, only Tazi signature (p = 0.026) predicted inferior CR1. In OS24 analysis of the HMA‐treated subgroup (N = 200), only Tazi signature was adverse (hazard ratio, HR = 1.6 [1.1–2.2]; p = 0.011). However, a forward stepwise multivariable age‐adjusted Cox model including all three signatures picked EPI6 as the sole significant adverse predictor in the entire cohort (p = 0.0001) as well as within the HMA‐treated subgroup (p = 0.0071). These data confirm the value of testing co‐occurring somatic alterations even within a high‐grade TP53‐mutated myeloid neoplasm cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recently, we could show that the co-mutations of KRAS + KEAP1, STK11 + KEAP1 and KRAS + STK11 + KEAP1 lead to a significantly shorter median overall survival (mOS) in patients with lung cancer across treatments by analyzing multiple dataset. TP53, a tumor suppressor gene, plays a crucial role in regulating cell cycle progression. Its mutations occur in approximately 40-50% of nonsmall lung cancer (NSCLC). Co-occurrence of all four mentioned mutations has been a matter of debate for years. The aim of this study was to assess the distribution of these four mutations and the influence of the different comutational patterns on survival. Methods: We present a comparative bioinformatic analysis and refer to data of 4,109 patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Results: Most of the mutations within the LUAD belong to TP53-only (29.0%), quadruple-negative (25.9%) and KRAS-only (13.4%). Whereas TP53-mutations seem to have protective effects in the context of further KEAP1- and KRAS + KEAP1-alterations (improved mOS), their role seems contrary if acquired in an already existing combination of mutations as KRAS + STK11, KRAS + STK11 + KEAP1 and STK11 + KEAP1. TP53 co-mutations had a negative influence on KRASonly mutated LUAD (mOS reduced significantly by more than 30%). Discussion: These data underline the need for complex mutational testing to estimate prognosis more accurately in patients with advanced LUAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death globally. More than 50% of new cases are diagnosed in an advanced or metastatic stage, thus contributing to the poor survival of such patients. Mutations in the KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma virus) gene occur in nearly a third of lung adenocarcinoma and have for decades been deemed an 'undruggable' target. Yet, in recent years, a growing number of small molecules, such as the GTPase inhibitors, has been investigated in clinical trials of lung cancer patients harboring KRAS mutations, yielding promising results with improved outcomes. Currently, there are only two approved targeted therapies (adagrasib and sotorasib) for advanced or metastatic KRAS-mutated NSCLC from the second-line setting onwards. In this narrative review, we will focus on KRAS, its molecular basis, the role of its co-mutations, clinical evidence for its inhibition, putative mutation to resistance, and future strategies to overcome resistance to KRAS inhibition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bilateral diffuse metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (BLDM‐LUAD) is a special imaging pattern of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). We retrospectively assessed survival outcomes and co‐mutation characteristics of BLDM‐LUAD patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations who were treated with EGFR‐yrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). From May 2016 to May 2021, among 458 patients who submitted samples for next generation sequencing (NGS) detection in 1125 patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and 44 patients were diagnosed as BLDM‐LUAD. In order to analyze the survival outcomes of BLDM‐LUAD patients harboring EGFR mutations who were treated with EGFR‐TKIs, the factors age, gender, smoking history, hydrothorax, site of EGFR mutations and EGFR‐TKIs treatment were adjusted using propensity score‐matching (PSM). The Kaplan‐Meier survival curves and log‐rank test were used to analyze progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The co‐mutation characteristics of BLDM‐LUAD patients harboring EGFR mutations were analyzed by NGS panels. 64 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations and first‐line treatment of EGFR‐TKIs were successfully matched. BLDM‐LUAD (n = 32) have significantly longer median PFS than control group (n = 32) (mPFS: 14 vs 6.2 months; p =.002) and insignificantly longer median OS than control group (mOS: 45 vs 25 months; p =.052). The patients with BLDM‐LUAD have the higher frequency of EGFR mutation than control group (84.1% vs 62.0%) before PSM. The co‐mutation genes kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) (9.4%), ataxia telangiectasia‐mutated (ATM) (7.4%) and mesenchymal‐epithelial transition (MET) (3.1%) only appeared in the control group after PSM. The BLDM‐LUAD harboring EGFR mutations was associated with a favorable prognosis to EGFR‐TKI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death globally. More than 50% of new cases are diagnosed in an advanced or metastatic stage, thus contributing to the poor survival of such patients. Mutations in the KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma virus) gene occur in nearly a third of lung adenocarcinoma and have for decades been deemed an ‘undruggable’ target. Yet, in recent years, a growing number of small molecules, such as the GTPase inhibitors, has been investigated in clinical trials of lung cancer patients harboring KRAS mutations, yielding promising results with improved outcomes. Currently, there are only two approved targeted therapies (adagrasib and sotorasib) for advanced or metastatic KRAS-mutated NSCLC from the second-line setting onwards. In this narrative review, we will focus on KRAS, its molecular basis, the role of its co-mutations, clinical evidence for its inhibition, putative mutation to resistance, and future strategies to overcome resistance to KRAS inhibition.

The purpose of the study: to conduct a systematic literature review on the effectiveness and feasibility of using information on the presence of KRAS gene mutations (in different codons), TP 53 (KP), ST K11/LKB1 (KL), and KEAP mutations and the association of KRAS m with PD -L1 status in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC ) as a predictor of the effectiveness of immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors.Material and Methods. The review includes data from randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses on the predictive value of KRAS mutation status for response to immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC over the past 10 years.Results. The presence of KRAS mutations in NSCLC patients could be a predictive factor for their response to immunotherapy, as several studies have demonstrated benefit from immunotherapy in these patients. The combination of KRAS mutation with TP 53 (KP) co-mutation predicts a better response to immunotherapy, while a combination with ST K11/LKB1 (KL) and KEAP 1 predicts a worse response (reduced response rate and overall and disease-free survival). In PD -L1-positive patients, the presence of KRAS mutation is associated with a better prognosis after treatment with immunotherapy. Moreover, the presence of KRAS mutation is associated with a worse response to first-line and subsequent-line chemotherapy, thus indicating a more promising use of immunotherapy in these patients.Conclusion. Identification of TP 53 (KP), ST K11/LKB1 (KL), and KEAP 1 co-mutations and the presence of KRAS mutation in addition to determination PD -L expression enable selection of patients who will obtain the greatest benefit from immunotherapy. In addition, the ability to determine KRAS mutation and co-mutation status using a liquid biopsy (with acceptable specificity and sensitivity) makes it possible to use this method for determining sensitivity to immunotherapy when it is not possible to obtain tumor sample (to determine PD 1-L1 expression).

Introduction: Co-occurring mutations in KRAS-mutant NSCLC are associated with discrete biological properties and modulate therapeutic susceptibilities. As G12D-specific inhibitors are expected to enter the clinic, we sought to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of patients with KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC. Methods: This was a retrospective single-institution study. Patients with NSCLC and KRAS G12D mutations detected by the Massachusetts General Hospital SNaPshot next-generation sequencing assay were identified. Clinical and pathologic characteristics were collected by chart review. Results: A total of 107 patients with KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC were identified. Most patients were former smokers (80, 74.8%) and had tumors with adenocarcinoma pathologic subtype (93, 86.9%). Among 56 patients evaluated for programmed death-ligand 1 expression, tumor proportion score was less than 50% in 43 (76.8%). Concomitant mutations were identified in STK11 (17 of 107, 15.9%), KEAP1 (10 of 58, 17.2%), TP53 (36 of 107, 33.6%), and SMARCA4 (11 of 107, 10.3%). Among 57 patients treated with first-line therapy, patients with STK11 co-mutations had shorter progression-free survival (1.2 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6–2.9 versus 4.1 mo, 95% CI: 2.5–6.0, p = 0.0235) and overall survival (4.3 mo, 95% CI: 1.2–10.6 versus 17.9 mo, 95% CI: 8.6–31.1, p = 0.0018) compared with wild type. Patients with KEAP1 co-mutations had shorter overall survival (4.6 mo, 95% CI: 1.2–10.6 versus 17.9 mo, 95% CI: 7.1–30.1, p = 0.0125) than those without. TP53 co-mutations exerted no influence on survival. Conclusions: Co-occurring mutations were common in patients with KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC. STK11 and KEAP1 co-mutations were associated with worse clinical outcomes, whereas co-occurring TP53 did not affect survival.

[Display omitted] • SARS-CoV-2 mutational landscape over time is shown through an entropy-based approach. • Entropy and Hellinger distance provide information about mutational viral trajectory. • Profiles coming from different functional protein classes show a different behaviour. • Structural and accessory proteins mostly show non uniform and high profiles. • A mutational phylogenetic tree is built to infer functional link among proteins. COVID-19 emergency has pushed the international scientific community to use every resource to combat the spread of the virus, to understand its biology and predict its possible evolution in terms of new variants. Since the first SARS-CoV-2 virus nucleotide and amino acid sequences were made available, information theory was used to study how viral information content was changing over time and then trace the evolution of its mutational landscape. In this work we analyzed SARS-CoV-2 sequences collected mainly in the USA in a period from March 2020 until December 2022 and computed mutation profiles of viral proteins over time through an entropy-based approach using Shannon Entropy and Hellinger distance. This representation allows an at-a-glance view of the mutational landscape of viral proteins over time and can provide new insights on the evolution of the virus from different points of view. Non-structural proteins typically showed flat mutation profiles, characterized by a very low Average mutation Entropy, while accessory and structural proteins showed mostly non uniform and high mutation profiles, often coupled with the predominance of variants. Interestingly NSP2 protein, whose function is currently still debated, falls in the same branch of NSP14 and NSP10 in the phylogenetic tree of mutations constructed through correlations of mutation profiles, suggesting a co-evolution of those proteins and a possible functional link with each other. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study based on a massive amount of data (n = 107,939,973) that analyzes from an entropy point of view the mutational landscape of SARS-CoV-2 over time and depicts a mutational temporal profile of each protein of the virus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Limited treatment outcome data is available for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with BRAF V600E mutations. In this multicenter study, we describe therapeutic options and survival outcomes for patients with mutated BRAF V600E. Method: This was a retrospective study in which BRAF V600E-mutated advanced NSCLC patients were retrospectively recruited between January 2015 and December 2021 and had their clinical characteristics, co-mutations, and treatment efficacy assessed. Results: Fifty-three patients with BRAF V600E-mutant advanced NSCLC were included in the study, of which 64.2% were non-smokers, and the BRAF V600E mutation was more prevalent in men (52.8%). In addition, 96.2% of the patients had adenocarcinoma, and most (96.2%) received first-line therapy (23.5% anti-BRAF), with a progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 10.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5–36.0 months] and 24.0 months [95% CI: 3.0–53.0 months], respectively. Twenty-three patients (43.4%) received second-line treatment (39.1% anti-BRAF), and PFS and OS were 5.0 [95% CI: 1.0–21.0 months] and 13.0 months [95% CI: 1.5–26.0 months], respectively. BRAF and MEK-targeted therapy (dabrafenib plus trametinib) produced longer PFS compared with that of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab as a first-line (NA vs. 4.0 months, P = 0.025) or second-line therapy (6.0 vs. 4.6 months, P = 0.017). NSCLC patients harboring driver oncogene mutations such as BRAF V600E, EGFR, or ALK should be treated using targeted therapies. Concurrent TP53 mutations were the most common, affecting 11.3% (n = 6) of the patients, followed by EGFR 19 Del (n = 5). Patients with concurrent mutations had shorter PFS (9.0 vs. 10.0 months, P = 0.875) and OS (14.0 vs. 15.0 months, P = 0.555) than those without these mutations. Conclusion: These results suggest that combined BRAF- and MEK-targeted therapy is effective in BRAF V600E-mutated advanced NSCLC patients. Dabrafenib and trametinib re-challenge is also an option for patients with BRAF V600E-mutated NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: CUX1 mutations have been reported in myeloid neoplasms. We aimed to characterize the mutational landscape, clonal architecture, and clinical characteristics of myeloid disorders with CUX1 variants.Methods: We reviewed data from a targeted 62-gene panel with CUX1 variants. Variants were classified as of strong or potential clinical significance (tier I/tier II) or of unknown significance (VUS).Results: CUX1 variants were identified in 169 cases. The 49 tier I/tier II variants were found in older patients (mean age, 71 vs 60 years old) and predominantly inactivating alterations, while the 120 VUS cases were missense mutations. Monosomy 7/deletion 7q was more common in tier I/tier II cases. Co-mutations were detected in 96% of tier I/tier II cases (average, 3.7/case) but in only 61% of VUS cases (average, 1.5/case). Tier I/tier II CUX1 variants tend to be subclonal to co-mutations (ASXL1, SF3B1, SRSF2, TET2). Among myeloid disorders, tier I/tier II cases were more frequently diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndromes and had a higher number of bone marrow dysplastic lineages.Conclusions: CUX1 mutations are seen with adverse prognostic features and could be a late clonal evolutional event of myeloid disorders. The differences between CUX1 tier I/tier II and VUS underscore the importance of accurate variant classification in reporting of multigene panels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundLimited treatment outcome data is available for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with BRAF V600E mutations. In this multicenter study, we describe therapeutic options and survival outcomes for patients with mutated BRAF V600E.MethodThis was a retrospective study in which BRAF V600E-mutated advanced NSCLC patients were retrospectively recruited between January 2015 and December 2021 and had their clinical characteristics, co-mutations, and treatment efficacy assessed.ResultsFifty-three patients with BRAF V600E-mutant advanced NSCLC were included in the study, of which 64.2% were non-smokers, and the BRAF V600E mutation was more prevalent in men (52.8%). In addition, 96.2% of the patients had adenocarcinoma, and most (96.2%) received first-line therapy (23.5% anti-BRAF), with a progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 10.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5–36.0 months] and 24.0 months [95% CI: 3.0–53.0 months], respectively. Twenty-three patients (43.4%) received second-line treatment (39.1% anti-BRAF), and PFS and OS were 5.0 [95% CI: 1.0–21.0 months] and 13.0 months [95% CI: 1.5–26.0 months], respectively. BRAF and MEK-targeted therapy (dabrafenib plus trametinib) produced longer PFS compared with that of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab as a first-line (NA vs. 4.0 months, P = 0.025) or second-line therapy (6.0 vs. 4.6 months, P = 0.017). NSCLC patients harboring driver oncogene mutations such as BRAF V600E, EGFR, or ALK should be treated using targeted therapies. Concurrent TP53 mutations were the most common, affecting 11.3% (n = 6) of the patients, followed by EGFR 19 Del (n = 5). Patients with concurrent mutations had shorter PFS (9.0 vs. 10.0 months, P = 0.875) and OS (14.0 vs. 15.0 months, P = 0.555) than those without these mutations.ConclusionThese results suggest that combined BRAF- and MEK-targeted therapy is effective in BRAF V600E-mutated advanced NSCLC patients. Dabrafenib and trametinib re-challenge is also an option for patients with BRAF V600E-mutated NSCLC.

Tumor protein p53 (TP53) is a tumor suppressor gene and TP53 mutations are associated with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. However, the in-depth classification of TP53 and its relationship with treatment response and prognosis in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant tumors treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors are unclear. Circulating tumor DNA was prospectively collected at baseline in advanced treatment-naïve EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with gefitinib in an open-label, single-arm, prospective, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial (BENEFIT trial) and analyzed using next-generation sequencing. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Of the 180 enrolled patients, 115 (63.9%) harbored TP53 mutations. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with TP53-wild type tumors were significantly longer than those of patients with TP53-mutant tumors. Mutations in exons 5–8 accounted for 80.9% of TP53 mutations. Mutations in TP53 exons 6 and 7 were significantly associated with inferior PFS and OS compared to wild-type TP53. TP53 mutation also influenced the prognosis of patients with different EGFR mutations. Patients with TP53 and EGFR exon 19 mutations had significantly longer PFS and OS than patients with TP53 and EGFR L858R mutations, and both groups had worse survival than patients with only EGFR mutations. Patients with TP53 mutations, especially in exons 6 and 7, had a lower response rate and shorter PFS and OS when treated with gefitinib. Moreover, TP53 exon 5 mutation divided TP53 mutations in disruptive and non-disruptive types.

BackgroundCo-mutations was associated with poor response to EGFR-TKIs. First-generation EGFR-TKIs combined with chemotherapy was reported to be more effective than TKIs alone in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients.ObjectiveThis retrospective study aimed to explore whether EGFR-mutant patients with co-mutations can benefit from EGFR-TKIs plus chemotherapy.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively collected data of 137 EGFR-mutant patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who underwent next-generation sequencing in our hospital in 2018. Among them, 96 were treated with EGFR–TKIs alone and 41 received EGFR–TKIs plus chemotherapy. We analyzed the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with co-mutations using different treatments.ResultsConcurrent TP53 mutations, especially exon 4 and 6, were associated with a markedly shorter time to progression on EGFR-TKI monotherapy (11.4 months vs. 16.6 months, P=0.003), while EGFR–TKIs plus chemotherapy would benefit those patients more (with TP53: 11.4 months vs. 19.1 months, P=0.001, HR=0.407; without TP53: 16.6 months vs. 18.9 months, P=0.379, HR=0.706). The incidence of T790M after resistance was equal in patients treated with different treatments (53% vs. 53%, P=0.985).ConclusionsIn our study, concurrent TP53 mutations were found to be risk factors for EGFR-TKI monotherapy, but TKI combined with chemotherapy could eliminate this heterogeneity.

Background: Co-mutations was associated with poor response to EGFR-TKIs. First-generation EGFR-TKIs combined with chemotherapy was reported to be more effective than TKIs alone in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients. Objective: This retrospective study aimed to explore whether EGFR -mutant patients with co-mutations can benefit from EGFR-TKIs plus chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively collected data of 137 EGFR -mutant patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who underwent next-generation sequencing in our hospital in 2018. Among them, 96 were treated with EGFR–TKIs alone and 41 received EGFR–TKIs plus chemotherapy. We analyzed the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with co-mutations using different treatments. Results: Concurrent TP53 mutations, especially exon 4 and 6, were associated with a markedly shorter time to progression on EGFR-TKI monotherapy (11.4 months vs. 16.6 months, P =0.003), while EGFR–TKIs plus chemotherapy would benefit those patients more (with TP53: 11.4 months vs. 19.1 months, P =0.001, HR=0.407; without TP53 : 16.6 months vs. 18.9 months, P =0.379, HR=0.706). The incidence of T790M after resistance was equal in patients treated with different treatments (53% vs. 53%, P =0.985). Conclusions: In our study, concurrent TP53 mutations were found to be risk factors for EGFR-TKI monotherapy, but TKI combined with chemotherapy could eliminate this heterogeneity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background To determine the relevance of the single or combination mutations of BRAF V600E, TERT, and NRAS genes and the clinicopathologic relationship in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Methods Patients with PTC were enrolled into the study between February 2018 and April 2019. Based on the number of mutant genes, we classified the participants into single BRAF V600E mutation group, double mutations group and no mutation group. Single factor and multiple logistic regression analyses were applied to explore the independent factors. Review Manager 5.3 was used for meta-analysis to review the clinical efficacy of gene co-mutations. Results Finally, 483 patients were enrolled into the study and 419 (86.7%) of them harbored BRAF V600E mutation. TERT or NRAS mutation was likely to coexist with BRAF V600E mutation in PTC. BRAF V600E and NRAS promoter co-mutations was identified in 6 patients, with a prevalence of 1.2%. Prevalence of BRAF V600E and TERT coexistence in PTC was 2.1%. Significant differences were found among age, pathology, multifocality, bilateral lesions, lymph node metastasis, and 131I radiotherapy, P

Background/Aim: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with activating somatic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have better outcomes with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) than with chemotherapy. However, even with the most effective therapies, not all patients respond. The presence of concurrent pathogenic mutations could play a role in resistance. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of concurrent mutations in genes other than EGFR on survival outcomes of patients treated with TKIs for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with TKIs in our center between January 2016 and December 2019. Clinical and pathological characteristics, EGFR mutational status, presence of co-occurring genetic alterations, overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated. Results: Of the 42 patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who received TKIs in our center, 22 (52%) had no concurrent mutations, 15 (36%) had a non-pathogenic, non-resistance co-mutation, and 5 (12%) had a concurrent resistance mutation. The median OS of the global population was 14.9 months, with a shorter OS in the group harboring a concurrent resistance mutation (7.7 vs. 18.1 months, p=0.002). Concurrent mutations possibly associated with resistance were found in PIK3CA, KRAS and PTEN genes. Conclusion: Concurrent resistance mutations in genes other than EGFR influenced the outcome of patients with NSCLC, while nonresistance mutations did not alter survival, compared to the absence of co-mutations. This evidence highlights the importance of a careful interpretation of molecular findings. The best treatment options for these patients should be studied in randomized controlled trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Oncogenic drivers have led to the development of targeted drugs in non-small cell lung cancer. • Responses of targeted therapies are limited by systematically acquired mechanisms of resistance. • The occurrence of co-mutations influences the tumour heterogeneity. • TP53 co-mutation affects treatment response and prognosis. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cause of cancer death worldwide. In non-squamous NSCLC, the identification of oncogenic drivers and the development of target-specific molecules led to remarkable progress in therapeutic strategies and overall survival over the last decade. Nevertheless, responses are limited by systematically acquired mechanisms of resistance early on after starting a targeted therapy. Moreover, mounting evidence has demonstrated that each oncogenic-driven cluster is actually heterogeneous in terms of molecular features, clinical behaviour, and sensitivity to targeted therapy. In this review, we aimed to examine the prognostic and predictive significance of oncogene-driven co-mutations, focusing mainly on EGFR and TP53. A narrative review was performed by searching MEDLINE databases for English articles published over the last decade (from January 2012 until November 2022). The bibliographies of key references were manually reviewed to select those eligible for the topic. The genetic landscape of EGFR -mutated NSCLC is more complicated than what is known so far. In particular, the occurrence of TP53 co-mutations stratify patients carrying EGFR mutations in terms of treatment response. The study provides a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying the variability of the genetic landscape of EGFR -mutated NSCLC and summarizes notably the clinical importance of TP53 co-mutations for an open avenue to more properly addressing the clinical decision-making in the near future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Co-occurring mutations in KRAS -mutant NSCLC are associated with discrete biological properties and modulate therapeutic susceptibilities. As G12D-specific inhibitors are expected to enter the clinic, we sought to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of patients with KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC., Methods: This was a retrospective single-institution study. Patients with NSCLC and KRAS G12D mutations detected by the Massachusetts General Hospital SNaPshot next-generation sequencing assay were identified. Clinical and pathologic characteristics were collected by chart review., Results: A total of 107 patients with KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC were identified. Most patients were former smokers (80, 74.8%) and had tumors with adenocarcinoma pathologic subtype (93, 86.9%). Among 56 patients evaluated for programmed death-ligand 1 expression, tumor proportion score was less than 50% in 43 (76.8%). Concomitant mutations were identified in STK11 (17 of 107, 15.9%), KEAP1 (10 of 58, 17.2%), TP53 (36 of 107, 33.6%), and SMARCA4 (11 of 107, 10.3%). Among 57 patients treated with first-line therapy, patients with STK11 co-mutations had shorter progression-free survival (1.2 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-2.9 versus 4.1 mo, 95% CI: 2.5-6.0, p  = 0.0235) and overall survival (4.3 mo, 95% CI: 1.2-10.6 versus 17.9 mo, 95% CI: 8.6-31.1, p  = 0.0018) compared with wild type. Patients with KEAP1 co-mutations had shorter overall survival (4.6 mo, 95% CI: 1.2-10.6 versus 17.9 mo, 95% CI: 7.1-30.1, p  = 0.0125) than those without. TP53 co-mutations exerted no influence on survival., Conclusions: Co-occurring mutations were common in patients with KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC. STK11 and KEAP1 co-mutations were associated with worse clinical outcomes, whereas co-occurring TP53 did not affect survival., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: STK11 mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with worse survival as well as primary resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 targeting immunotherapy. We hypothesize that co-occurring mutations and tumor mutation burden (TMB) may impact response to therapy and prognosis., Methods: Forty-one patients with STK11 -mutated NSCLC seen in our Thoracic oncology clinic with available next-generation sequencing tumor data were included in the analysis. Data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was used for survival and immune gene expression analysis. Overall and progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a log-rank test., Results: In the 41 patients included, common co-occurring alterations with STK11 were KRAS (54%), TP53 (44%), CDKN2A (37%) and KEAP1 (27%). Overall 17 patients received locoregional therapy with surgery or radiation with median OS of 8.6 years and there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes with KRAS and TP53 co-occurring mutations. Response to both chemotherapy and immunotherapy was poor across all co-occurring mutations. However, TP53 co-mutation was associated with improved clinical benefit with immunotherapy. Patients with higher TMB had longer PFS with immunotherapy. In TCGA survival analysis, tumors with STK11 mutation with or without KRAS co-mutation were associated with worse survival (P<0.05) but tumors with STK11/TP53 co-mutation did not have worst survival compared to STK11 wild type tumors. Moreover, co-occurring mutations had significant effect on intratumoral immune status with both STK11 alone and STK11/KRAS co-mutated tumors showing more enrichment for wound healing immune subtype while STK11/TP53 co-mutated tumors showed more enrichment for IFN-g immune subtype., Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis in patients with STK11 -mutated NSCLC found that both TMB and co-occurring mutations may be predictors for response to immunotherapy with worse outcomes in patients with low TMB or KRAS co-mutation and improved outcomes with TP53 co-mutation. Patients with STK11 -mutated NSCLC also demonstrate chemotherapy resistance but have similar outcomes with localized treatment compared to STK11 wild type tumors. Moreover, co-mutations with KRAS or TP53 significantly alter tumor immune landscape of STK11 -mutated tumors and therefore response to immunotherapy., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-21-1377/coif). JM reports grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Beigene, Astra Zeneca, Blueprint medicines, and Sanofi, grants from Celldex, Beyond Spring Pharma, and Biohaven, personal fees from Oncocyte, outside the submitted work. MP reports personal fees from Bayer, outside the submitted work. NC reports grants from Merck and Tempus, outside the submitted work. SKJ reports grants and personal fees from Merck, grants from Beigene, personal fees from Syntactx and IMX Medical Reviewer, outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Simple Summary: Co-mutations may affect EGFR-TKIs efficacy in advanced EGFR mutated NSCLC and could be associated with worse prognosis. Using a clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel we retrospectively assessed the impact of co-alterations in 106 consecutive patients treated with front-line EGFR-TKIs. Clinical and molecular data were retrieved. According to our data, co-mutations do not seem to have any predictive nor prognostic role. Co-mutations are associated with younger age at diagnosis and lymph nodes metastases at baseline. No association with PD-L1 expression level was observed. Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) show variable efficacy in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFR+) NSCLC patients, even in patients harbouring the same mutation. Co-alterations may predict different outcomes to TKIs. Methods: We retrospectively analysed all consecutive EGFR+ advanced NSCLC treated with first-line TKIs at our Institutions. NGS with a 22 genes clinical panel was performed on diagnostic specimens. PD-L1 expression was also evaluated. Results: Of the 106 analysed specimens, 59 showed concomitant pathogenic mutations. No differences in OS (mOS 22.8 vs. 29.5 months; p = 0.088), PFS (mPFS 10.9 vs. 11.2 months; p = 0.415) and ORR (55.9% vs. 68.1%; p = 0.202) were observed comparing patients without and with co-alterations. Subgroup analysis by EGFR mutation type and TKIs generation (1st/2nd vs. 3rd) did not show any difference too. No correlations of PD-L1 expression levels by co-mutational status were found. Significant associations with presence of co-alterations and younger age (p = 0.018) and baseline lymph nodes metastases (p = 0.032) were observed. Patients without concomitant alterations had a significant higher risk of bone progression (26.5% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.011). Conclusions: Pathogenic co-alterations does not seem to predict survival nor efficacy of EGFR TKIs in previously untreated advanced NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tumor protein p53 (TP53) is a tumor suppressor gene and TP53 mutations are associated with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. However, the in-depth classification of TP53 and its relationship with treatment response and prognosis in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant tumors treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors are unclear. Circulating tumor DNA was prospectively collected at baseline in advanced treatment-naïve EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with gefitinib in an open-label, single-arm, prospective, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial (BENEFIT trial) and analyzed using next-generation sequencing. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Of the 180 enrolled patients, 115 (63.9%) harbored TP53 mutations. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with TP53-wild type tumors were significantly longer than those of patients with TP53-mutant tumors. Mutations in exons 5-8 accounted for 80.9% of TP53 mutations. Mutations in TP53 exons 6 and 7 were significantly associated with inferior PFS and OS compared to wild-type TP53. TP53 mutation also influenced the prognosis of patients with different EGFR mutations. Patients with TP53 and EGFR exon 19 mutations had significantly longer PFS and OS than patients with TP53 and EGFR L858R mutations, and both groups had worse survival than patients with only EGFR mutations. Patients with TP53 mutations, especially in exons 6 and 7, had a lower response rate and shorter PFS and OS when treated with gefitinib. Moreover, TP53 exon 5 mutation divided TP53 mutations in disruptive and non-disruptive types., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: KRAS mutations reported in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represent a significant percentage of patients diagnosed with NSCLC. However, there still remains no therapeutic option designed to target KRAS. In an era with immunotherapy as a dominant treatment option in metastatic NSCLC, the role of immunotherapy in., Kras: mutated patients is not clear., Methods: Eligible patients diagnosed with NSCLC and found to have a KRAS mutation were identified in an institutional lung cancer database. Demographic, clinical, and molecular data was collected and analyzed., Results: A total of 60 patients were identified for this retrospective analysis. Majority of patients were Caucasian (73%), diagnosed with stage IV (70%) adenocarcinoma (87%), and had a KRAS codon 12 mutation (78%). Twenty percent of patients were treated with immunotherapy. Median overall survival was 28 months in the cohort and patients who received immunotherapy were found to have better survival versus those who did not (33 vs. 22 months, P=0.31). Furthermore, there was an association between high survival and patients who received immunotherapy (P=0.007)., Conclusions: Patients with KRAS mutations have a unique co-mutation phenotype that requires further investigation. Immunotherapy seems to be an effective choice of treatment for KRAS positive patients in any treatment-line setting and yields better outcomes than conventional chemotherapy. The relationship between immunotherapy and KRAS mutations requires further studies to confirm survival advantage., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2020.04.18). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The series “Role of Precision Imaging in Thoracic Disease” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship., (2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

C-MET proto-oncogene is a tyrosine kinase situated on chromosome 7. C-MET and its ligand hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) play a role in proliferation, differentiation and organ development. C-MET genetic aberrations are found associated with driving tumorigenesis. In this retrospective study, we reviewed molecular analysis data gathered from a cancer institute during a two-year period (2010-2012). Upon detection of tumors harboring c-MET mutations, we determined the status of the other mutations tested and evaluated c-MET expression by fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH). Our search resulted in identification of 134 c-MET mutations, 44% of which had mutations of at least one of the other genes tested. No c-MET expression aberrancy was detected in this subset by FISH. Survival amongst the patients with surgically resected metastatic colorectal cancers (CRC) was slightly better in those with only a c-MET mutation compared to those with no mutation detected, although the difference was not statistically significant. When c-MET inhibition becomes an integrated part of chemotherapy practice, our observed frequency of co-mutations will be an argument for utilizing c-MET targeted treatment in combination with other targeted drugs and therapeutic strategies. Larger studies can aid to further parse out c-MET prognostic and therapeutic significance.