Search

Objective: We wanted to identify risk factors for dehiscence of cesarean section (CS) scars in patients undergoing repeated cesarean section. Material and methods: This was a retrospective case-control study over a 3-year period in our medical center (2011-2014), comparing women who had repeated CS without complications and women diagnosed with dehiscence. Data were collected from medical records and the groups were compared for demographic and obstetrical data. Results: Dehiscence was identified in 27 women, while 54 women without dehiscence were the control group. Statistically significant differences were found in the need for augmentation, the number of previous cesarean sections, cesarean section in the active phase of labor and length of hospitalization. Discussion: The need for augmentation of labor, CS in the nonactive stage and more than one cesarean section, all increased the risk of dehiscence. There was no association between dehiscence and scar pain, time elapsed since the previous cesarean section, the method of wound closure or fever. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An isthmocele appears as a fluid pouchlike defect in the anterior uterine wall at the site of a prior cesarean section and ranges in prevalence from 19% to 84%, a direct relation to the increase in cesarean sections performed worldwide. Many definitions have been suggested for the dehiscence resulting from cesarean sections, and we propose standardization with a single term for all cases-isthmocele. Patients are not always symptomatic, but symptoms typically include intermittent abnormal bleeding, pain, and infertility. Pregnancy complications that result from an isthmocele include ectopic pregnancy, low implantation, and uterine rupture. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasound are the gold standard imaging techniques for diagnosis. Surgical treatment of an isthmocele is still a controversial issue but should be offered to symptomatic women or the asymptomatic patient who desires future pregnancy. When surgery is the treatment choice, laparoscopy guided by hysteroscopy, hysteroscopy alone, or vaginal repair are the best options depending on the isthmocele's characteristics and surgeon expertise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and cesarean scar dehiscence (CSD) are the most dreaded complications of cesarean scar (CS). As the incidence of CS is increasing worldwide, so is the incidence of CSP, especially in cases with assisted reproduction techniques. It is of utmost importance to diagnose CSP in the early first trimester, as it can lead to myometrial rupture with fatal outcome. On the other hand, CSD may be encountered during pregnancy or in the postpartum period. CSD in the postpartum period is very rare and can cause secondary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) leading to increased maternal morbidity or even death if not diagnosed and managed promptly. Both complications can be diagnosed on ultrasonography (USG) and confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These two conditions carry high morbidity and mortality. In this article, we highlight the role of imaging in the early diagnosis and management of these conditions.

Aim The aim of this study was to examine the current status and management of secondary infertility following cesarean section in Japan. Material and Methods A two-step questionnaire survey was performed in 1092 facilities, including teaching hospitals and artificial reproductive technology clinics, registered with the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. In our questionnaires, we obtained data about symptoms, clinical findings, diagnostic methods, and pregnancy outcomes. Treatments were sorted into three groups, namely typical infertility treatment (group A), conservative treatment (group B), and operative treatment (group C). Results Of the 1092 facilities, 616 (56%) sent back reply forms to the first questionnaire; 56 (32%) of 176 facilities answered the second questionnaire, and 189 cases were able to be analyzed after completion of the two questionnaires. The commonest symptom was abnormal uterine bleeding during the follicular phase (91 cases; 48% of the 189 eligible cases), and the commonest clinical finding was fluid pooling in the area of cesarean scar dehiscence during the ovulatory phase (142 cases; 75%). The most commonly used diagnostic method was transvaginal ultrasound (153 cases, 81%). The pregnancy rate was 33% in group A, 50% in group B, and 60% in group C. In patients with abnormal uterine bleeding, painful symptoms and fluid pooling at the cesarean scar dehiscence, the pregnancy rate was significantly higher in group C (64%) than in group A (16%; P = 0.0063). Conclusions We recommend operative treatment for secondary infertility following cesarean section with painful symptoms and fluid pooling at the site of cesarean scar dehiscence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and cesarean scar dehiscence (CSD) are the most dreaded complications of cesarean scar (CS). As the incidence of CS is increasing worldwide, so is the incidence of CSP, especially in cases with assisted reproduction techniques. It is of utmost importance to diagnose CSP in the early first trimester, as it can lead to myometrial rupture with fatal outcome. On the other hand, CSD may be encountered during pregnancy or in the postpartum period. CSD in the postpartum period is very rare and can cause secondary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) leading to increased maternal morbidity or even death if not diagnosed and managed promptly. Both complications can be diagnosed on ultrasonography (USG) and confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These two conditions carry high morbidity and mortality. In this article, we highlight the role of imaging in the early diagnosis and management of these conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Case report: A 28-year-old woman presented with massive postpartum hemorrhage. Laparotomy revealed a cesarean scar dehiscence due to wound infection. Conclusion: Although postpartum hemorrhage due to cesarean scar dehiscence is an unusual complication, practitioners should add dehiscence to their differential diagnoses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]