Search

Copyright of Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: Central venous access plays a crucial role in various clinical settings, and ultrasound guidance has become increasingly popular for improving its safety and success rates. The aim of this meta‐analysis was to compare the short‐axis (SAX) and long‐axis (LAX) ultrasound‐guided techniques for internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation in terms of first needle pass success rate, number of cannulation attempts, access time, guidewire insertion time, posterior IJV wall puncture, arterial puncture, haematoma and catheter‐related bloodstream infection. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted, and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SAX and LAX techniques for IJV cannulation on adults were included. Results: A total of 11 RCTs involving 1183 patients were included in the meta‐analysis. The SAX technique demonstrated a significantly greater first needle pass success rate and faster IJV access time compared to the LAX technique. However, more posterior IJV wall puncture was significantly associated with the SAX technique. There was no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of number of cannulation attempts, guidewire insertion time, arterial puncture, haematoma and catheter‐related bloodstream infection. Conclusion: This meta‐analysis suggests that the SAX technique may have advantages over the LAX technique in terms of first needle pass success rate and potentially reducing cannulation attempts and access time. However, the occurrence of posterior IJV wall puncture raises concerns. The decision on the choice of technique should be based on individual patient factors and operator proficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Chronic use of totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) in pediatric oncology patients can be challenging in terms of pain and anxiety. Our aim is to evaluate the usefulness of virtual reality (VR) goggles to reduce anxiety and pain in children and to facilitate the work of the nursing team. We conducted a clinical trial with two groups randomized to use the goggles or not, and for the intervention group we used a relaxation video in the Raja Ampat environment (Ecosphere app by Phoria®) for Oculus Quest 2 goggles (Meta Platforms®, Menlo Park, CA, USA). Our results highlighted that the use of VR goggles could be a simple addition to clinical practice to reduce anxiety and pain in oncology children using TIVADs, and could also facilitate the work of the nursing team, helping to achieve a more efficient use of time. Introduction: Pediatric oncology patients use totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) to enable central venous access. Anxiety, pain and/or discomfort are common despite anesthesia. Virtual reality (VR) is a non-pharmacological approach that may reduce pain and anxiety in these patients. We aimed to assess the use of VR for reducing anxiety/pain in patients with TIVADs while facilitating the task of healthcare providers when accessing a TIVAD. Methods: patients 4–18 years old with a TIVAD were prospectively randomized to an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG). In the IG, VR goggles (Oculus Quest 2, Meta Platforms®, Menlo Park, CA, USA) were used displaying a relaxing video in the Raja Ampat environment (Ecosphere app from Phoria®) while the TIVAD was accessed. The CG was managed as per standard of care. Satisfaction and pain were measured by FPS-R and STAIC scales, respectively. Results: this is the report of a prospective, randomized (60 per group)—unblinded—, single institution study of 120 pediatric oncology patients enrolled from January to April 2022. Median ages for IG and CG were 9.22 and 10.52 years, respectively. Satisfaction was higher in the IG (4.80) compared to the CG (3.92), p ≤ 0.0001. Regarding pain, mean FPS-R scores were 1.79 for the CG and 0.83 for the IG. Significantly different scores were found in the 12 to 18 years group, p ≤ 0.05. The healthcare professionals index of satisfaction was high (4.50 mean Likert score) for the IG compared to accessing the TIVAD without VR (3.73 mean Likert score). Conclusion: The use of VR helped reduce pain and/or discomfort in pediatric oncology patients, mainly in the older age group as they can better interact with VR. Healthcare providers were satisfied with the help of VR for TIVAD management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vascular access in neonates and small infants is often challenging. Ultrasound (US) screening and guidance improves its safety and efficacy. The advantages of a pre-implantation ultrasound examination are intuitive; it is a practical and safe technique that doesn't use radiation, allowing static and dynamic evaluations to be carried out and identifying anatomical variations, the caliber and depth of the vessel, the patency of the entire course and attached structures (nerves, etc.). Optimization of the image is a crucial aspect in achieving a clear view of all anatomical structures while avoiding complications. The goal of this review was to look into the benefits of using US in invasive catheter insertion procedures, especially in pediatric patients. Ultrasonography is used to visualize vessels and related structures in two dimensions (2D), sometimes with the help of color Doppler to detect the presence of intraluminal thrombi by applying gentle compression to assess vessel collapse and evaluate morphologic changes in the internal jugular vein (IJV) who had undergone central venous catheter (CVC) insertion during the neonatal period (Montes-Tapia et al. in J Pediatr Surg 51:1700–1703, 2016). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Central venous access is one of the most commonly performed medical procedures, requested often to initiate chemotherapy or hemodialysis. Duplicate superior vena cava (SVC) or left sided SVC are rare venous anomalies, more often seen in patients with congenital cardiac issues. Most patients are asymptomatic and the anomaly is an incidental finding at time of catheter placement. This case report presents a duplicate superior vena cava discovered when attempting Mediport placement under fluoroscopy for chemotherapy. Clinical awareness and recognition of this rare venous anomaly is important because it can lead to life threatening events.

Central venous catheters (CVCs) have many benefits in patient care but are associated with increasing risks with catheter duration. A level II trauma-certified community hospital sought to decrease CVC duration utilizing a daily assessment algorithm in the critical care unit. After implementation, CVC days decreased from 490 CVC days per 1,000 patient days to 452 (odds ratio 0.86, P <.01) and catheter duration decreased from 7.71 days to 6.57 (P =.19). • Algorithm guiding decision to determine central venous catheter (CVC) necessity. • CVC days per patient day decreased with the use of the algorithm. • CVC duration decreased with the use of the algorithm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

KEY IDEAS: The use of whole blood in the prehospital setting is increasing.Currently available intraosseous and peripheral venous catheters limit the flow of blood products and fluid during resuscitation.Central venous catheters can be effectively placed in the prehospital environment.Rapid, high‐volume infusion of blood products can be lifesaving. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The brachiocephalic vein (BCV) is a feasible option for central venous access in the pediatric population and is rapidly developing as an alternative site for insertion of the central line in young children with faster insertion times, fewer attempts, and lower rates of complications. However, studies demonstrating the feasibility of BCV catheterization in adult patients are insufficient. The current study sought to assess the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular right BCV cannulations in adults. Methods: A linear array Ultrasound (US) probe was used to obtain a longitudinal picture of the BCV beginning at the junction of the internal jugular vein and the subclavian vein in the supraclavicular region. Under US supervision, the needle was guided into the BCV using the in-plane approach. A prospective study was performed on 80 adult patients scheduled for elective and emergency operative procedures under general anesthesia requiring a central venous catheter (CVC). Success rates and complications that occurred during catheter insertion were analyzed. Results: CVC placement was successful in all adults. The procedure was successful at the first attempt in 74 cases (92.5%) and after 2 attempts in six patients (7.5%). The time to guide wire insertion was 31.26 s (19–58 s), and catheter insertion took 88.44 s (63–145 s). The mean length of catheter insertion was 10.46 cm. No complications were noted. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular BCV catheterization offers a new and safe method for central venous line catheterization in adults. However, larger trials and meta-analyses are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate the safety of this technique.

IntroductionClinical outcomes of implantable port catheters (IPCs) placed via alternative veins such as the external jugular and cervical collaterals have not been well established. This investigation evaluates the short- and long-term outcomes of IPCs inserted via alternate cervical veins (ACV) compared to traditionally inserted IPCs via the internal jugular vein (IJV).Materials and methodsA total of 24 patients who received an IPC between 2010 and 2020 via an ACV-defined as the external jugular vein, superficial cervical vein, or unnamed collateral veins-were identified. Based on power analysis, a matched control group of 72 patients who received IPCs via the IJV was identified. Non-inferiority analysis for port complications was performed between the two groups based on the selected non-inferiority margin of 20%. Secondary end points included complication-free survival and comparison of complications by the time at which they occurred.ResultsACV access was non-inferior to traditional access for overall complications. Alternate access resulted in fewer complications than traditional access with an estimated reduction of - 7.0% [95% CI - 23.6%, 39.7%]. There was no significant difference in peri-procedural and post-procedural complications between the two groups. Complication-free survival was also equivalent between the two groups.ConclusionIPC placement via ACVs was non-inferior to IPCs placed via traditional access through the IJV. When abnormal pathology obviates the use of IJV access, other cervical veins may be considered prior to seeking alternate locations such as femoral, translumbar, inferior vena cava, and hepatic veins.

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the applicability of the central line‐associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in pediatric oncology patients. Methods: Bacteremia episodes from 2020 to 2022 from a prospective cohort of pediatric oncology patients with a central venous catheter were included. Episodes were classified by three medical experts following the CLABSI criteria as either a CLABSI or non‐CLABSI (i.e., contamination, other infection source, or mucosal barrier injury‐laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection (MBI‐LCBI)). Subsequently, they were asked if and why they (dis)agreed with this diagnosis following the criteria. The primary outcome was the percentage of episodes where the experts clinically disagreed with the diagnosis given following the CLABSI criteria. Results: Overall, 84 bacteremia episodes in 71 patients were evaluated. Following the CLABSI criteria, 34 (40%) episodes were classified as CLABSIs and 50 (60%) as non‐CLABSIs. In 11 (13%) cases the experts clinically disagreed with the diagnosis following the CLABSI criteria. The discrepancy between the CLABSI criteria and clinical diagnosis was significant; McNemar's test p <.01. Disagreement by the experts with the CLABSI criteria mostly occurred when the experts found an MBI‐LCBI a more plausible cause of the bacteremia than a CLABSI due to the presence of a gram negative bacteremia (Pseudomonas aeruginosa n = 3) and/or mucositis. Conclusions: A discrepancy between the CLABSI criteria and the evaluation of the experts was observed. Adding Pseudomonas aeruginosa as an MBI pathogen and incorporating the presence of mucositis in the MBI‐LCBI criteria, might increase the applicability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: anatomical variations of the veins of the proximal part of the limbs are rare. Its knowledge is essential in the context of surgical procedures or central venous access. Material and methods: the surgical records of 100 patients operated on for brachial plexus injuries were analyzed. Results: we report of high position of the subclavian vein. The vein was located in a superior position with respect to the artery and brachial plexus, and in proximity to the posterior aspect of the middle third of the clavicle. Discusion: the variant described is infrequent and although its presence is mentioned in the literature, there are no clear data on its incidence. We find the description of these two cases of interest, highlighting their importance in brachial plexus repair surgery, in central venous accesses and in clavicular fracture repair surgery. Conclusions: the presence of a high subclavian vein is infrequent, but its existence should be known in the context of brachial plexus surgery or central venous puncture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Vascular Access is the property of Canadian Vascular Access Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective: To evaluate the safety and functionality of the transhepatic approach as an alternative route for central venous catheterization in pediatric patients with chronic critical illness. Methods: The study included data of 12 chronic critically ill pediatric patients who underwent central venous catheterization with transhepatic approach. The indications, procedure details, mean patency time, and catheter-related complications were retrospectively analyzed. Results: A total of 16 central venous catheters were placed through the transhepatic approach. A 5F port catheter was used in eight attempts, a 5F PICC in two attempts, and an 8–14F Hickman-Broviac catheter in six attempts. All procedures were performed with technical success. The mean patency time of the catheters was 132.1 d (range: 12–540 d). In the long-term follow-up, catheter-related sepsis was detected in a patient, and six catheters lost functionality due to malposition. Conclusion: The transhepatic approach is a safe and functional alternative route for central venous access in chronic critically ill pediatric patients requiring long-term vascular access. The procedure using ultrasonography and fluoroscopy can be performed with high technical success. In the long-term follow-up, Dacron felt cuff tunneled catheters placed in the subcostal space with a transhepatic approach remained functional for a long time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Taurolidine containing lock solutions (TL) are a promising method for the prevention of central line associated bloodstream infections. Per accident, the TL may not always be aspirated from the central venous catheter (CVC) before blood cultures are obtained. The TL could, unintentionally, end up in a blood culture vial, possibly altering the results. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the TLs on the detection of microbial growth in blood culture vials. Methods: Different lock solutions (taurolidine-citrate-heparin (TCHL), taurolidine, heparin, citrate or NaCl) were added to BD BACTECTM blood culture vials (Plus Aerobic/F, Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F or Peds Plus/F) before spiking with Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213 or a clinical strain) or Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922 or a clinical strain) in the presence and absence of blood. Subsequently, blood culture vials were incubated in the BD BACTEC FX instrument with Time-to-positivity (TTP) as primary outcome. In addition, the effect of the TCHL on a variety of other micro-organisms was tested. Discussion: In the presence of taurolidine, the TTP was considerably delayed or vials even remained negative as compared to vials containing heparin, citrate or NaCl. This effect was dose-dependent. The delayed TTP was much less pronounced in the presence of blood, but still notable. Conclusion: This study stresses the clinical importance of discarding TLs from the CVC before obtaining a blood culture.

None.

Abstract Background Central venous catheters may become embedded due to the formation of adhesions between the indwelling catheter and the vein wall. Case presentation A 49-year-old patient with bacteraemia was referred for retrieval of an embedded internalised central venous dialysis catheter. Recently the catheter had been surgically ligated at the venotomy site internalising the intravascular catheter component, which precluded antegrade ballooning through the catheter hub. Seldinger technique was used to access the catheter lumen within the left internal jugular vein and through and through access was established across the catheter. Retrograde endoluminal balloon dilation was performed to disrupt adhesions and free the catheter. The catheter was snared over the wire and removed from the right femoral vein. Conclusion This case report outlines an effective, minimally invasive retrieval method in a rare case of an embedded internalised central venous catheter. Graphical Abstract

Background: Central venous catheters may become embedded due to the formation of adhesions between the indwelling catheter and the vein wall. Case presentation: A 49-year-old patient with bacteraemia was referred for retrieval of an embedded internalised central venous dialysis catheter. Recently the catheter had been surgically ligated at the venotomy site internalising the intravascular catheter component, which precluded antegrade ballooning through the catheter hub. Seldinger technique was used to access the catheter lumen within the left internal jugular vein and through and through access was established across the catheter. Retrograde endoluminal balloon dilation was performed to disrupt adhesions and free the catheter. The catheter was snared over the wire and removed from the right femoral vein. Conclusion: This case report outlines an effective, minimally invasive retrieval method in a rare case of an embedded internalised central venous catheter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 46-year-old woman with stage 5 chronic kidney disease was unable to undergo hemodialysis treatment due to thoracic central venous obstruction (TCVO) and blockage of the tunneled cuffed catheter. This patient also presented with symptoms of TCVO. When percutaneous procedure was not possible, we resolved the obstruction with the innominate-to-right-atrial bypass grafting technique under extracorporeal circulation. There are few reports on this surgical approach. In terms of patient prognosis, this may be an effective solution to this problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Amiodarone is one of the most commonly used anti-arrhythmic drugs. However, intravenous amiodarone is associated with direct irritation of vessel walls and phlebitis. This paper reviewed studies on factors, prevention and nursing countermeasures of amiodarone-induced phlebitis, and provided reference for clinical practice and prevention of amiodarone-induced phlebitis. (胺碘酮注射液为常用抗心律失常药物, 也是临床常见易导致静脉炎的药物之一。本研究胺碘酮注射液导致静脉炎的成因、预防方法和护理技巧等方面进行综述, 以期为临床提供有效的预防和护理建议。)

HIGHLIGHTS: CLABSIs are a major concern in both the adult and pediatric patient population. Contamination of catheter hubs is a common cause of CLABSI. A novel, transparent line guard protects CVAD hubs from gross contamination. Central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs) are a serious and potentially deadly complication in patients with a central venous access device (CVAD). CVADs play an essential role in modern medicine, serving as lifelines for many patients. To maintain safe and stable venous access, infection prevention bundles are used to help protect patients from complications such as CLABSI. Despite most CLABSIs being preventable, rates have been on the rise, often disproportionately impacting critically ill children. New solutions are needed to strengthen infection prevention bundles and protect CVADs from pathogen entry at catheter hubs and line connections. A novel, Food and Drug Administration–listed device has become available recently to guard CVADs from sources of gross contamination, addressing this apparent gap in infection prevention technology and practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Objective: COVID-19 pandemic caused several clinicopathological conditions. The majority of the patients required intensive care. Even in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, invasive procedures were challenging for healthcare workers due to the highly infectious nature of the disease and the need to work in cumbersome personal protective equipment. Peripheral and central venous catheterisation (CVC) were the most performed invasive procedures. We evaluated the preferred anatomical region and the preferred insertion method of CVC by the intensive care physicians. Methodology: The study was conducted between July 2020 and October 2020, after obtaining institutional ethics committee approval. Physicians working in ICUs across Turkey were included in the survey. A specialy prepared questionnaire was delivered online to the study sample via email invitation or social media applications. A total of 314 people received the questionnaire, 4 of the respondents did not allow the use of the survey data and 53 did not complete the questionnaire, so 57 records were excluded from the study and statistical data analysis was performed on 247 responses. Results: Participants were aged between 25 and 60 y. Regarding academic status, 97 of the participants were assistants, 112 were specialists, 25 were assistant professors, 5 were associate professors and 8 were professors. The number of catheters inserted by the physicians participating in the study showed statistically significant decrease during the pandemic period but controversially total number of catheters inserted in the ICUs showed no difference. Femoral vein was the most preferred anatomic region during pandemic period in both intubated patients, and patients using other ventilation support devices. Physician's preferred method of catheter insertion remains the same. Conclusion: Central venous catheterisation is one of the vital invasive procedures performed on patients admitted to intensive care. The vital nature of the procedure, the proximity of the insertion site to the airway and the cumbersome personal protective equipment worn by healthcare workers made it a challenging intervention. we concluded that intensive care physicians in our country are reluctant to use central venous catheters because of concerns about contracting infection, and as a result of these concerns, they increase the use of personal protective equipment and protect themselves by changing anatomical site for catheterization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Invasive procedures are associated with adverse events that are both hazardous to patients and expensive to treat. A trainee is expected to perform complex sterile invasive procedures in a dynamic environment under time pressure while maintaining patient safety at the highest standard of care. For mastery in performing an invasive procedure, the automatism of the technical aspects is required, as well as the ability to adapt to patient conditions, anatomic variability, and environmental stressors. Virtual reality (VR) simulation training is an immersive technology with immense potential for medical training, potentially enhancing clinical proficiency and improving patient safety. Virtual reality can project near-realistic environments onto a head-mounted display, allowing users to simulate and interact with various scenarios. Virtual reality has been used extensively for task training in various healthcare-related disciplines and other fields, such as the military. These scenarios often incorporate haptic feedback for the simulation of physical touch and audio and visual stimuli. In this manuscript, the authors have presented a historical review, the current status, and the potential application of VR simulation training for invasive procedures. They specifically explore a VR training module for central venous access as a prototype for invasive procedure training to describe the advantages and limitations of this evolving technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: During internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation, needle tip injury to vulnerable subjacent cervical anatomic structures can be prevented if the cannulating needle tip is not permitted, even momentarily, to penetrate the deep portion of the IJV wall, an event known as double-wall puncture (DWP), also called posterior wall puncture. Methods: We conducted a 6-year ultrasound-guided IJV cannulation quality improvement project, seeking tominimize the occurrence of DWP in 228 adult patients using needles of different gauge and tip sharpness. Most needles were length-optimized to the distance between the skin puncture site and the IJV mid-lumen for a selected angle of needle insertion by (1) using a nylon screw-on needle stop or (2) using a cannulating needle that already had the desired shaft length. Results: Standard central venous cannulation kit needles were long enough to reach or traverse the deepest portion of the IJV wall in nearly all patients. Use of extra-sharp, smaller-diameter needles in place of standard needles was associated with a 26.3% relative reduction in DWP rate. Use of needles length-optimized to reach only the IJV mid-lumen was associated with a 78.4% relative reduction in DWP rate. A 0% DWP rate was attained using length-optimized 21-gauge extra-sharp needles and length-optimized 20-gauge needles of intermediate sharpness. Conclusion: The 9.2% DWP rate achieved during this project was approximately half the rate reported at the time of project inception. Use of length-optimized, sharper, narrower-gauge cannulating needles may help avoid DWP during ultrasound-guided IJV cannulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the complications of central venous catheterization (CVC). Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center in India from December 2018 to September 2020. Critically ill patients (aged ≥18 years) in the intensive care unit undergoing CVC procedures were included in the study. Baseline demographics and detailed medical history were recorded. Chest X-rays and electrocardiography were performed on all the patients. Complications associated with CVC were recorded. Results: A total of 100 patients with the indication for central venous catheter insertion were included. The majority (81%) of the patients were inserted with CVC at the right internal jugular vein. Complications such as arterial puncture (2%), hematoma (4%), blood clot formation (4%), catheter kinking (3%), thoracic injury (1%), thrombophlebitis (6%), sepsis (9%) and nerve injury (1%) were reported. Conclusions: Though central venous access is preferred in management of critically ill patients, it has its risks. However, early recognition and prompt management of complications may reduce mortality and morbidity. Physicians and intensive care unit intensivists should be vigilant for central venous catheter-related complications. Suitable site selection, operator experience, and proper catheter maintenance are associated with optimal outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The implanted vascular access ports (PORTs) were compared with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) as the administration of chemotherapy regarding different clinical effects and adverse effects. Which is better is debatable. Hence, the current study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of these two optimal vascular access strategies. Methods: The following electronic databases were searched: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library updated in May 2023. Studies on the differences in complication rates in patients with cancer using either PICC or PORT for chemotherapy were included. Meta-analysis Revman 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 22 articles were retrieved. The results suggested that PORT has a superior safety profile, with lower incidences of overall adverse effects (OR=2.72, 95% CI=1.56-4.72 P=0.0004), catheter-related thrombosis (OR=2.84, 95% CI=1.97-4.11, P<0.00001), and allergic reactions (OR=6.26, 95% CI=1.86-21.09, P=0.003) than typically expected with PICC. Moreover, PICC was non-inferior to the PORT group with respect to DVT (OR=2.00, 95% CI=0.86-4.65, P=0.11) and infection (OR=1.55, 95% CI=0.75-3.22, P=0.24). Conclusion: PORT achieved safety benefits compared with chemotherapy through PICC. Therefore, PORT is regarded as safe and effective vascular access for the administration of chemotherapy. When considering economic factors and some key elements, more high-quality research would help verify these clinical benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, central venous access line teams were implemented at many hospitals throughout the world to provide access for critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to describe the structure, practice patterns, and outcomes of these vascular access teams during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional, self-reported study of central venous access line teams in hospitals afflicted with the COVID-19 pandemic. To participate in the study, hospitals were required to meet one of the following criteria: development of a formal plan for a central venous access line team during the pandemic; implementation of a central venous access line team during the pandemic; placement of central venous access by a designated practice group during the pandemic as part of routine clinical practice; or management of an iatrogenic complication related to central venous access in a patient with COVID-19.ResultsParticipants from 60 hospitals in 13 countries contributed data to the study. Central venous line teams were most commonly composed of vascular surgery and general surgery attending physicians and trainees. Twenty sites had 2657 lines placed by their central venous access line team or designated practice group. During that time, there were 11 (0.4%) iatrogenic complications associated with central venous access procedures performed by the line team or group at those 20 sites. Triple lumen catheters, Cordis (Santa Clara, Calif) catheters, and nontunneled hemodialysis catheters were the most common types of central venous lines placed by the teams. Eight (14%) sites reported experience in placing central venous lines in prone, ventilated patients with COVID-19. A dedicated line cart was used by 35 (59%) of the hospitals. Less than 50% (24 [41%]) of the participating sites reported managing thrombosed central lines in COVID-19 patients. Twenty-three of the sites managed 48 iatrogenic complications in patients with COVID-19 (including complications caused by providers outside of the line team or designated practice group).ConclusionsImplementation of a dedicated central venous access line team during a pandemic or other health care crisis is a way by which physicians trained in central venous access can contribute their expertise to a stressed health care system. A line team composed of physicians with vascular skill sets provides relief to resource-constrained intensive care unit, ward, and emergency medicine teams with a low rate of iatrogenic complications relative to historical reports. We recommend that a plan for central venous access line team implementation be in place for future health care crises.

Objective: To evaluate the complications of central venous catheterization (CVC). Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center in India from December 2018 to September 2020. Critically ill patients (aged ≥18 years) in the intensive care unit undergoing CVC procedures were included in the study. Baseline demographics and detailed medical history were recorded. Chest X-rays and electrocardiography were performed on all the patients. Complications associated with CVC were recorded. Results: A total of 100 patients with the indication for centralvenous catheter insertion were included. The majority (81%) of the patients were inserted with CVC at the right internal jugular vein. Complications such as arterial puncture (2%), hematoma (4%), blood clot formation (4%), catheter kinking (3%), thoracic injury(1%), thrombophlebitis (6%), sepsis (9%) and nerve injury (1%)were reported. Conclusions: Though central venous access is preferred in management of critically ill patients, it has its risks. However, early recognition and prompt management of complications may reduce mortality and morbidity. Physicians and intensive care unit intensivists should be vigilant for central venous catheter-related complications. Suitable site selection, operator experience, and proper catheter maintenance are associated with optimal outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the optimal methods of employing ultrasound to enhance vascular access. A novel user interface which dynamically displays transverse (short) and longitudinal (long) planes simultaneously was developed to optimize ultrasound-guided vascular access. This study aimed to assess the impact of this novel biplane axis technology on central venous access performance. METHODS: Eighteen volunteer emergency medicine resident physicians and physician assistants were recruited from a single center to participate in this prospective, randomized crossover study. Following a brief instructional video, participants were randomized to perform ultrasound-guided vascular access using either short-axis or biplane axis approaches first, followed by the opposite technique following a brief washout period. Time to cannulation was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included success rate, posterior wall and arterial puncture rates, time to scout, number of attempts, number of needle redirections, participant cannulization and visualization confidence, and interface preference. RESULTS: Short-axis imaged approach was associated with a significantly shorter time to cannulation (34.9 seconds versus 17.6, p<0.001) and time to scout (30 versus 49 seconds, p=0.008) when compared to biplaneaxis imaging approach. No significant differences were noted when comparing first pass success, number of attempts, number of redirections, and posterior wall and arterial wall puncture. Participants' cannulation/visualization confidence and axis preference both favored the short-axis imaging approach. CONCLUSION: Further studies are needed to assess the clinical value of novel biplane axis ultrasound imaging in the performance of ultrasound-guided procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Vascular Access Ports (VAPs) consist of an indwelling catheter connected to an implanted port that provides direct access for sample collection or infusion. The use of VAPs in biomedical research reduces trauma on vessels from repeated venipuncture, decreases secondary infections, promotes social housing and animal welfare, and increases the accuracy and efficiency of study procedures. In addition to enabling comprehensive data collection, VAPs increase satisfaction, and well-being by minimizing interference with daily routines and fostering cooperation. The responsible use of VAPs includes approval by the institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC), verification of the surgeon′s skill and experience, and confirmation that research staff are trained on the proper maintenance and access techniques. This document aims to provide surgeons, researchers and research staff, veterinary staff, and IACUCs with guidelines for implanting, maintaining, accessing, and troubleshooting vascular access ports in large animal species. (Rabbit, Canine, Feline, Nonhuman Primate, Porcine).

Background and objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors for failure of subclavian vein catheterization. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1562 patients who underwent subclavian vein puncture performed by the same experienced operator at Peking University Cancer Hospital from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2019 was conducted. The success or failure of subclavian vein catheterization was registered in all cases. Various patient characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), preoperative hemoglobin, preoperative hematocrit, preoperative mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), preoperative albumin, preoperative serum creatinine, puncture needles from different manufacturers and previous history of subclavian vein catheterization were assessed via univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: For the included patients, landmark-guided subclavian vein puncture was successful in 1476 cases and unsuccessful in 86 cases (success rate of 94.5%). Successful subclavian vein catheterization was achieved via right and left subclavian vein puncture in 1392 and 84 cases, respectively. In univariate analyses, age and preoperative hemoglobin were associated with failure of subclavian vein catheterization. In a multivariate analysis, aged more than 60 years was a risk factor while the central venous access with Certofix® was associated with an increased rate of success (p-values of 0.001 and 0.015, respectively). Conclusions: This study has demonstrated that patient aged more than 60 years was a risk factor for failure of subclavian vein catheterization while the central venous access with Certofix® was associated with an increased rate of success.

Background: Central venous catheter (CVC) placement is a frequently performed procedure in the emergency department (ED). We aim to compare two different ultrasound (US)-guided techniques, the short-axis (SAX) approach and the oblique axis (OAX) approach for the insertion of internal jugular vein (IJV) catheters in an ED setting. Methods: This prospective, observational study was conducted in the ED of a single tertiary care teaching hospital on patients requiring IJV cannulation. CVC placement was done using both the SAX and OAX approaches as per the ED physician's discretion. Outcome measures included acute complications, successful insertion of an IJV catheter, number of attempts, and access times. The Chi-square test was used to compare the study variables (acute complications, number of cannulation attempts, and successful cannulation) between the two approaches. Mann–Whitney U-test was applied to compare the mean differences of flash time and cannulation time. Results: Sixty patients were enrolled, of which 30 underwent IJV cannulation by the SAX technique and 30 by the OAX technique. We noted a total of 22 acute complications, 56.7% in the SAX group and 16.7% in the OAX group. A significant incidence of posterior venous wall puncture was noted in the SAX group (50.0%). No significant statistical differences were noted on analysis of other outcome measures. Conclusion: The OAX approach is a useful alternative technique to IJV cannulation in the ED setting. Further multicentric studies in this domain will be required to consider this technique as the primary approach to US-guided IJV cannulation in the ED setting.

Background: Liver transplant centers vary in approach to intraoperative vascular accesses, monitoring of cardiac function and temperature management. Evidence is limited regarding impact of selected modalities on postoperative outcomes. Objectives: To review the literature and provide expert panel recommendations on optimal intraoperative arterial blood pressure (BP), central venous pressure (CVP), and vascular accesses, monitoring of cardiac function and intraoperative temperature management regarding immediate and short‐term outcomes after orthotopic liver transplant (OLT). Methods: Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. Recommendations made for: (1) Vascular accesses, arterial BP and CVP monitoring, (2) cardiac function monitoring, and (3) Intraoperative temperature management (CRD42021239908). Results: Of 2619 articles screened 16 were included. Studies were small, retrospective, and observational. Vascular access studies demonstrated low rates of insertion complications. TEE studies demonstrated low rates of esophageal hemorrhage. One study found lower hospital‐LOS and 30‐day mortality in patients monitored with both PAC and TEE. Other monitoring studies were heterogenous in design and outcomes. Temperature studies showed increased blood transfusion and ventilation times in hypothermic groups. Conclusions: Recommendations were made for; routine arterial and CVP monitoring as a minimum standard of practice, consideration of discrepancy between peripheral and central arterial BP in patients with hemodynamic instability and high vasopressor requirements, and routine use of high flow cannulae while monitoring for extravasation and hematoma formation. Availability and expertise in PAC and/or TEE monitoring is strongly recommended particularly in hemodynamic instability, portopulmonary HT and/or cardiac dysfunction. TEE use is recommended as an acceptable risk in patients with treated esophageal varices and is an effective diagnostic tool for emergency cardiovascular collapse. Maintenance of intraoperative normothermia is strongly recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the low risk of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion-related bleeding, the practice of administering prophylactic platelets varies greatly. Limiting unnecessary blood product transfusions reduces transfusion-related adverse events, financial cost, and delays in care. We assessed the impact of lowering prophylactic platelet administration threshold on blood product utilization patterns and bleeding events. This quasi-experimental study was conducted in an urban academic tertiary medical center. The study population included patients with platelet counts ≥ 10,000/µL and < 50,000/µL undergoing PICC placement in 2018 and 2019 when the minimum platelet thresholds were 50,000/µL and 10,000/µL, respectively. The primary outcome was blood product utilization and the secondary outcome was PICC insertion-related bleeding complications. Thirty-five patients using the 10,000/µL (10 K) platelet threshold and 46 patients using the 50,000/µL (50 K) platelet threshold were enrolled. The 50 K group received more platelets before PICC insertion (0.870 ± 0.885 and 0.143 ± 0.430 pools of platelets-per-person, p < 0.001). No patients experienced clinically significant bleeding. Immediately following PICC insertion, minor bleeding occurred in five patients (two [4.3%] and three [8.6%] in the 50 K and 10 K groups, respectively). Bleeding rates between the two cohorts did not differ (p = 0.647). Lowering the minimum platelet threshold from 50,000/µL to 10,000/µL resulted in less prophylactic platelet and total blood product administration with no appreciable difference in PICC insertion-related bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]