Search

Background Nationwide trends in the utilization of catheter-directed therapies for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in the Medicare population are essential as they represent a major health care challenge. The annual incidence and mortality with venous thromboembolism are around 900,000 and 60,000 to 100,000 patients, respectively, in the United States. Methods Data were acquired from the Data.CMS.gov website on Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary with a list of Medicare Part B fee-for-service claims from 2015 to 2021. Current Procedural Terminology codes 37187 (percutaneous venous mechanical thrombectomy) and 37212 (thrombolytic venous therapy) were queried for deep vein thrombosis. Similarly, Current Procedural Terminology codes 37184 (percutaneous arterial mechanical thrombectomy) and 37211 (thrombolytic arterial therapy) were queried for pulmonary embolism. Annual procedure counts, site of service, and self-reported specialty of the operator were recorded. Results Overall, there was a trend toward increasing utilization of thrombectomy and decreasing utilization of thrombolysis procedures for both deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Radiologists performed the majority of the catheter-directed therapy interventions for deep vein thrombosis, while radiologists and surgeons performed a similar number of catheter-directed therapy procedures for pulmonary embolism. Cardiologists were third in the catheter-directed therapy procedure count for both deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Conclusion An analysis of nationwide trends from 2015 to 2021 suggests increasing utilization of thrombectomy starting in 2020 when compared to thrombolysis for catheter-directed therapies for both deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism procedures. Newer thrombectomy technologies may be one of the drivers of this shift from thrombolysis to thrombectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Venous thromboembolisms constitute a major cause of morbidity and mortality with 60,000 to 100,000 deaths attributed to pulmonary embolism in the US annually. Both clinical presentations and treatment strategies can vary greatly, and the selection of an appropriate therapeutic strategy is often provider specific. A pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) offers a multidisciplinary approach to clinical decision making and the management of high-risk pulmonary emboli. There is insufficient data on the effect of PERT programs on clinical outcomes. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane to identify PERT studies through March 2024. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes included the rates of surgical thrombectomy, catheter directed thrombolysis, hospital length of stay (HLOS), and ICU length of stay (ICULOS). We used the Newcastle−Ottawa Scale tool to assess studies' quality. We used random-effects models to compare outcomes between the pooled populations and moderator analysis to identify sources of heterogeneity and perform subgroup analysis. Results: We included 13 observational studies, which comprised a total of 12,586 patients, 7512 (60%) patients were from the pre-PERT period and 5065 (40%) patients were from the PERT period. Twelve studies reported the rate of all-cause mortality for their patient population. Patients in the PERT period were associated with similar odds of all-cause mortality as patients in the pre-PERT period (OR: 1.52; 95% CI: 0.80–2.89; p = 0.20). In the random-effects meta-analysis, there was no significant difference in ICULOS between PERT and pre-PERT patients (difference in means: 0.08; 95% CI: −0.32 to 0.49; p = 0.68). There was no statistically significant difference in HLOS between the two groups (difference in means: −0.82; 95% CI: −2.86 to 1.23; p = 0.43). Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates no significant difference in all studied measures in the pre- and post-PERT time periods, which notably included patient mortality and length of stay. Further study into the details of the PERT system at institutions reporting mortality benefits may reveal practice differences that explain the outcome discrepancy and could help optimize PERT implementation at other institutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Residual Pulmonary Vascular Obstruction (RPVO) is an area of increasing focus in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) due to its association with long-term morbidity and mortality. The predictive factors and the effect catheter-directed therapies (CDT) have on RPVO are still under investigation. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective review between April 2017 and July 2021. Patients with intermediate risk of PE were included. Patient variables associated with RPVO were analyzed and the degree of clot burden was quantified using the Qanadli score. Results: A total of 551 patients with acute PE were identified, 288 were intermediate risk and 53 had RPVO based on CT or V/Q scan three months post-PE. Baseline clot burden was higher in patients who received CDT compared to those who received anticoagulation alone (Qanadli score 45.88% vs. 31.94% p < 0.05). In univariate analysis, treatment with CDT showed a HR of 0.32 (95% CI 0.21–0.50, p < 0.001) when compared with anticoagulation alone. Patient variables including intermediate-high risk, sPESI ≥ 1, elevated biomarkers, RV dysfunction on imaging, malignancy, history of or concurrent DVT were also significantly associated with development of RPVO in univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis, only baseline Qanadli score (HR 13.88, 95% CI 1.42–135.39, p = 0.02) and concurrent DVT (HR 2.53, 95% CI 1.01–6.40, p = 0.04) were significantly associated with the development of RPVO. Conclusions: Catheter-directed therapy may be associated with a reduced risk of RPVO at 3 months; however, quantitative clot burden scores, such as the Qanadli score, may be stronger predictors of the risk of developing RPVO at 3 months. Further prospective studies are required [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant medical condition with substantial morbidity and mortality. The clinical signs are diverse and therefore our task is to study it, especially in severe cases that are promoted by the development of cardiogenic shock due to right ventricular failure. The topic of this article is an overview of the current options for the treatment for acute pulmonary embolism, bearing in mind risk stratification and the latest guidelines and recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology. Research and progress in medicine worldwide has moved on over the past decades and, new pharmacological and technical possibilities constantly arise, the field of pulmonary embolism being no exeption. Therefore it is necessary to be well aware of the current pharmacological, invasive and surgical options for its therapy, and which have been tested in many clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 40-year-old patient confirmed on computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries (CT/PAs) a large saddle pulmonary embolus in the main PA extending in both branches. He was managed by ultrasound-supported catheter-directed (EkoSonic, Boston Scientific) intrapulmonary thrombolytic therapy using a recombinant tissue plasminogen activator prolonged infusion over 16 h with a total dose of 50 mg divided in both PAs simultaneously with intravenous unfractionated heparin. He showed clinical improvement with improved arterial oxygen (PaO2) with reduced oxygen therapy with a nasal cannula. Follow-up right heart catheterization showed a significant reduction of PA pressure from 96/32 (mean 64) to 47/27 (mean 39) mmHg. Repeat pulmonary angiography showed significant improvement in PA branch opacification, suggesting increased flow and successful therapy. The patient received oral anticoagulants for months. He had followed with CT/PA and echocardiogram after 4 weeks, both were normalized. He resumed his regular physical activities, including exercises in the gymnasium.

Current guidelines recommend anticoagulation alone for low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) with the addition of systemic thrombolysis for high-risk PE. However, treatment recommendations for intermediate-risk PE are not well-defined. Due to bleeding risks associated with systemic thrombolysis, ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis (USAT) has evolved as a promising treatment modality. USAT is thought to decrease the rate of major bleeding by using localized delivery with lower thrombolytic dosages. Currently, there is little guidance on the implementation of USAT in the real-world clinical setting. This study was designed to evaluate our experience with USAT at this single community hospital with a newly initiated Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT). All patients identified by the PERT with an acute PE diagnosed by a computed tomography (CT) scan from January 2021 to January 2023 were included. During the study period, there were 89 PERT activations with 40 patients (1 high-risk and 37 intermediate-risk PE) receiving USAT with alteplase administered at a fixed rate of 1 mg/h per catheter for 6 h. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score within 48 h after USAT. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding within 72 h. The mean age was 57.4 ± 17.4 years and 50% (n = 20) were male, 17.5% (n = 7) had active malignancy, and 20% (n = 8) had a history of prior deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or PE. The mean PESI score decreased from baseline to 48 h post-USAT (84.7 vs 74.9; p = 0.025) and there were no major bleeding events. The overall hospital length of stay was 7.5 ± 9.8 days and ICU length of stay was 2.2 ± 2.8 days. This study outlined our experience at this single community hospital which resulted in an improvement in PESI scores and no major bleeding events observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 40-year-old patient confirmed on computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries (CT/PAs) a large saddle pulmonary embolus in the main PA extending in both branches. He was managed by ultrasound-supported catheter-directed (EkoSonic, Boston Scientific) intrapulmonary thrombolytic therapy using a recombinant tissue plasminogen activator prolonged infusion over 16 h with a total dose of 50 mg divided in both PAs simultaneously with intravenous unfractionated heparin. He showed clinical improvement with improved arterial oxygen (PaO2) with reduced oxygen therapy with a nasal cannula. Follow-up right heart catheterization showed a significant reduction of PA pressure from 96/32 (mean 64) to 47/27 (mean 39) mmHg. Repeat pulmonary angiography showed significant improvement in PA branch opacification, suggesting increased flow and successful therapy. The patient received oral anticoagulants for months. He had followed with CT/PA and echocardiogram after 4 weeks, both were normalized. He resumed his regular physical activities, including exercises in the gymnasium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: For patients with high-risk pulmonary artery embolism (PE), catheter-directed therapies pose a viable alternative treatment option to systemic thrombolysis or anticoagulation. Right now, there are multiple devices available which have been proven to be safe and effective in lower-risk settings. There is, however, little data comparing their efficacies in high-risk PE. Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center study on patients with high-risk PE undergoing catheter interventional treatment. Patients receiving large-bore catheter thrombectomy were compared to patients receiving alternative treatment forms. Results: Of the 20 patients included, 9 received large-bore thrombectomy, and 11 received alternative interventional treatments. While the baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, periprocedural and in-hospital mortality tended to be significantly lower with large-bore thrombectomy when compared to other treatment forms (0 vs. 55% and 33 vs. 82%, p = 0.07 and 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: In this small, retrospective study, large-bore thrombectomy was associated with lower mortality as compared to alternative treatment forms. Future prospective research is needed to corroborate these findings.

Right ventricular (RV) failure is a critical cause of morbidity and mortality in patients presenting with pulmonary embolism (PE). The presentation of RV failure is based on the combination of clinical findings, laboratory abnormalities, and imaging evidence. An improved understanding of the pathophysiology of RV dysfunction following PE has given rise to more accurate risk stratification and broader therapeutic approaches. A subset of patients with PE develop chronic RV dysfunction with or without pulmonary hypertension. In this review, we focus on the impact of PE on the RV and its implications for risk stratification, prognosis, acute management, and long-term therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Early data on use of catheter-directed therapies (CDT) for treatment of Intermediate or High-Risk pulmonary embolism (PE) show improvement in pulmonary artery systolic pressures (PAsP) and RV/LV ratios. Occasionally a paradoxical rise in PAsP was observed with CDT utilizing ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT). It is unclear whether this pattern is seen with CDT utilizing mechanical aspiration. Objectives: To investigate and compare the changes in PAsP between those who underwent CDT with USAT to those with mechanical aspiration. Methods: A retrospective analysis of those diagnosed with Intermediate or High-Risk PE who underwent CDT using USAT or mechanical aspiration from 7/2013 to 3/2023. The primary outcome was comparison of PAsP changes between the two modalities. Secondary outcomes include length of stay, mortality, and bleeding complications. Results: A total of 142 patients were analyzed, of which 93 underwent USAT and 49 underwent mechanical thrombectomy. The mechanical thrombectomy group had significantly lower post-intervention PAsP than the USAT group (42.2 ± 13.4 mmHg vs 54.5 ± 15.2 mmHg, p

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cause of cardiovascular mortality in the United States, and the submassive PE accounts for 20%-25% of all acute PE. In the last decade, endovascular therapy with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) intervention has shown great success in the treatment of submassive PE. There is limited data regarding using these devices to treat patients with concomitant abdominal aortic and renal vessel clots. Herein, we present a case of a 23-year-old male who presented with submassive PE associated with abdominal aortic thrombosis and renal infarcts. The patient was successfully treated with CDT with complete resolution of pulmonary and bilateral renal artery clots.

Abstract Introduction and objectives: Hemodynamically unstable patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) are eligible for systemic thrombolysis (ST). However, catheter-directed therapy (CDT) and surgical thrombectomy (SUT) can also be considered with less clinical evidence. Limited information exists regarding the best reperfusion therapy in this setting. Our objective was to perform a descriptive analysis of different reperfusion therapies in acute pulmonary embolism and determine their safety and efficacy profile. Methods: Retrospective analysis from a prospective single-centre registry of patients admitted with a diagnosis of PE from 2006 through 2021 who required reperfusion therapy. We analyzed the in-hospital outcomes and at 14-day follow up. Results: A total of 50 out of 399 patients admitted with a diagnosis of PE received reperfusion therapies and were included in our analysis. Mean age, 64.5 (53-72), 46% female. This was the reperfusion strategy applied: ST (44%), CDT (42%) and SUT (14%). All patients had right ventricular dilatation and high troponin levels. The overall in-hospital mortality was 18%. Major and minor bleeding rates among the different reperfusion methods were 9.0% vs 4.7% vs 57.4%; P = .001), and 18.1% vs 9.5% vs 14.2%; P = NS), respectively. The 14-day follow-up showed that only CDT and SUT reduced the pulmonary artery systolic pressure while ST and CDT were associated with a reduced right ventricular diameter and an improved right ventricular function. Conclusions: High mortality rates were found in this population with acute PE. No differences were seen regarding effectiveness seen among the different reperfusion strategies used. CDT and SUT may be considered as alternative reperfusion methods especially if ST is contraindicated.

[Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The clinical presentation of pulmonary embolism (PE) and acute coronary syndrome can be similar. We report a case of a patient presenting with antero-septal ST-segment elevation after cardiac arrest, found to have acute-PE-mimicking ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), treated with aspiration thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). A 78-year-old man was admitted with dyspnea, chest pain and tachycardia. During evaluation, cardiac arrest in pulseless electrical activity was documented. Advanced life support was started immediately. ECG post-ROSC revealed ST-segment elevation in V1–V4 and aVR. Echocardiography showed normal left ventricular function but right ventricular (RV) dilation and severe dysfunction. The patient was in shock and was promptly referred to cardiac catheterization that excluded significant CAD. Due to the discordant ECG and echocardiogram findings, acute PE was suspected, and immediate invasive pulmonary angiography revealed bilateral massive pulmonary embolism. Successful aspiration thrombectomy was performed followed by local alteplase infusion. At the end of the procedure, mPAP was reduced and blood pressure normalized allowing withdrawal of vasopressor support. Twenty-four-hour echocardiographic reassessment showed normal-sized cardiac chambers with preserved biventricular systolic function. Bedside echocardiography in patients with ST-segment elevation post-ROSC is instrumental in raising the suspicion of acute PE. In the absence of a culprit coronary lesion, prompt pulmonary angiography should be considered if immediately feasible. In these cases, CDT and aspiration in high-risk acute PE seem safe and effective in relieving obstructive shock and restoring hemodynamics.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) continues to represent a significant health care burden and its incidence is steadily increasing worldwide. Constantly evolving therapeutic options and the rarity of randomized controlled trial data to drive clinical guidelines impose challenges on physicians caring for patients with PE. Recently, PE response teams have been developed and recommended to help address these issues by facilitating a consensus among local experts while advocating the management of acute PE according to each individual patient profile. In this review, we focus on the clinical challenges supporting the need for a PE response team, report the current evidence for their implementation, assess their impact on PE management and outcomes, and address unanswered questions and future directions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common acute cardiovascular syndrome. Percutaneous catheter directed hydro-mechanical defragmentation (HMD) is one of the recommended treatment options for PE in patients with contraindications to thrombolytic therapy or failed systemic thrombolysis (ST). We aimed to identify the safety and outcomes of catheter directed HMD in patients with high-risk PE. This nonrandomized controlled trial enrolled all patients with confirmed diagnoses of high- and intermediate-high-risk PE from October 2019 till January 2021. Fifty patients were included and divided into two groups by the PE response team according to the presence or absence of a contraindication for ST. Group B (ST) consists of 25 patients and group A (HMD) of 25 patients who cannot receive ST. Results The two groups were comparable regarding baseline clinical characteristics with mean age 51 ± 13 years. In group A, systolic blood pressure (BP) and oxygen saturation increased after 24 h (p = 0.002) and 48 h (p

Copyright of Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular mortality. There has been little change in PE mortality rates over the past two decades making this an appealing area for innovation and development. While anticoagulation (AC) and systemic thrombolysis (ST) are the mainstay treatments for high-risk PE and intermediate-high-risk PE with decompensation, advancements in catheter- based therapies offer potential alternatives. Areas covered here will include present guidelines for PE treatment and the landscape of catheter-directed therapies with a focus on the FlowTriever (FT) Retrieval System. Available safety and efficacy data will be reviewed. An online search via Google Scholar and PubMed with the keywords INARI Flowtriever, venous thromboembolism, and pulmonary embolism, alongside bibliographies of published articles, was undertaken as a review of the literature on the FlowTriever system for this device overview. The five-year outlook on the role of catheter-directed therapies in the management of PE includes continued innovation in catheter-directed therapies and a number of high-quality trials on the horizon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common acute cardiovascular syndrome. Percutaneous catheter directed hydro-mechanical defragmentation (HMD) is one of the recommended treatment options for PE in patients with contraindications to thrombolytic therapy or failed systemic thrombolysis (ST). We aimed to identify the safety and outcomes of catheter directed HMD in patients with high-risk PE. This nonrandomized controlled trial enrolled all patients with confirmed diagnoses of high- and intermediate-high-risk PE from October 2019 till January 2021. Fifty patients were included and divided into two groups by the PE response team according to the presence or absence of a contraindication for ST. Group B (ST) consists of 25 patients and group A (HMD) of 25 patients who cannot receive ST. Results: The two groups were comparable regarding baseline clinical characteristics with mean age 51 ± 13 years. In group A, systolic blood pressure (BP) and oxygen saturation increased after 24 h (p = 0.002) and 48 h (p < 0.001) compared to pre-HMD procedure. Mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) and respiratory rate (RR) decreased after 48 h and at 30 days (p < 0.001) compared to pre-HMD procedure. The increase in systolic BP and oxygen saturation were significantly higher in HMD group compared with ST group after 48 h and at 30 days (p < 0.007). The decrease in PASP and RR was significantly higher in HMD group compared to ST group after 48 h and at 30 days (p < 0.001). Mortality rate at 30 days was 20% in HMD group compared to 32% in ST group. Conclusions: Catheter directed HMD for high-risk and intermediate-high-risk PE is safe and effective with acceptable mortality Trial registration Clinical trial ID: NCT04099186. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intermediate-risk (submassive) pulmonary embolism (PE) describes normotensive patients with evidence of right ventricular compromise, whereas high-risk (massive) PE comprises those who have experienced hemodynamic decompensation with hypotension, cardiogenic shock, or cardiac arrest. Together, these 2 syndromes represent the most clinically challenging manifestations of the PE spectrum. Prompt therapeutic anticoagulation remains the cornerstone of therapy for both intermediate- and high-risk PE. Patients with intermediate-risk PE who subsequently deteriorate despite anticoagulation and those with high-risk PE require additional advanced therapies, typically focused on pulmonary artery reperfusion. Strategies for reperfusion therapy include systemic fibrinolysis, surgical pulmonary embolectomy, and a growing number of options for catheter-based therapy. Multidisciplinary PE response teams can aid in selection of appropriate management strategies, especially where gaps in evidence exist and guideline recommendations are sparse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Iliofemoral venous thrombosis carries a high risk for pulmonary embolism, recurrent deep vein thrombosis, and post-thrombotic syndrome complicating 30% to 71% of those affected. The clinical scenarios in which iliofemoral venous thrombosis is managed may be diverse, presenting a challenge to identify optimum therapy tailored to each situation. Goals for management include preventing morbidity from venous occlusive disease, and morbidity and mortality from pulmonary embolism. Anticoagulation remains the standard of care for iliofemoral venous thrombosis, although a role for more aggressive therapies with catheter-based interventions or surgery exists in select circumstances. Results from recent prospective trials have improved patient selection guidelines for more aggressive therapies, and have also demonstrated a lack of efficacy for certain conservative therapies. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Iliofemoral venous thrombosis carries a high risk for pulmonary embolism, recurrent deep vein thrombosis, and post-thrombotic syndrome complicating 30% to 71% of those affected. The clinical scenarios in which iliofemoral venous thrombosis is managed may be diverse, presenting a challenge to identify optimum therapy tailored to each situation. Goals for management include preventing morbidity from venous occlusive disease, and morbidity and mortality from pulmonary embolism. Anticoagulation remains the standard of care for iliofemoral venous thrombosis, although a role for more aggressive therapies with catheter-based interventions or surgery exists in select circumstances. Results from recent prospective trials have improved patient selection guidelines for more aggressive therapies, and have also demonstrated a lack of efficacy for certain conservative therapies. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cause of cardiovascular death. Every specialty of medical practitioner will encounter PE in their patients, and should be prepared to employ contemporary strategies for diagnosis and initial risk-stratification. Treatment of PE is based on risk-stratification, with anticoagulation for all patients, and advanced modalities including systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed therapies, and mechanical circulatory supports utilized in a manner paralleling PE severity and clinical context., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr. Drew Birrenkott has no disclosures. Dr. Dudzinski has no disclosures. Dr. Kabrhel reports Grants (paid to my institution): Grifols, Diagnostica Stago Consulting/Advisory Boards: Siemens, BMS/Pfizer, Abbot Equity: Insera Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed, low-dose fibrinolysis (USAT) appears to provide promising results for the management of acute submassive pulmonary embolisms (ASMPEs) at tertiary care centers. This study assessed outcome measures at a community-based hospital systems and compared results to known studies. Materials and Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study assessing clinical outcomes of the EkoSonic Endovascular System intervention for ASMPEs performed by three surgical 3 subspecialties (interventional radiology, interventional cardiology, and vascular surgery) part of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT). We reviewed 146 PERT activations from June 2013 to December 2017. Eighty-three patients with ASMPEs underwent USAT. Results: Our study showed greater differences (P =.01) between baseline and follow-up pulmonary artery systolic pressures (20.9 ± 9.8 mm Hg [n = 14]) compared to the ULTIMA study (12.3 ± 10 mm Hg [n = 30]). Our length-of-stay measures were shorter (6.1 ± 5.1 [n = 83]; P =.0001) compared to the SEATTLE II study (8.8 ± 5.0 [n = 150]). Preprocedure transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) were performed for 54 (65%) of 83 patients. Postprocedure TTEs at 48 hours was performed for 52 (62%) of 83 patients. Use of TTEs before and after intervention did not change outcomes. Intracranial hemorrhage was not observed in our patient population. There was no difference in outcomes between the three subspecialties in our study. Conclusions: Use of USAT in a community-based hospital PERT has similar outcomes to tertiary care centers. Furthermore, similar outcomes were observed between the three subspecialties suggesting development of a comprehensive care team for management of ASMPEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pulmonary embolism is a common cause of morbidity and mortality which continues to increase in overall incidence. Because it can occur with a wide range of clinical presentations, different guidelines have been developed for appropriate risk stratification of patients; interventional radiology plays a vital role in the management of both massive and submassive pulmonary embolism. Catheter-directed therapy, including mechanical and aspiration thrombectomy, standard catheter-directed thrombolysis, and ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis, has many benefits, including lower thrombolytic doses and intraclot administration of thrombolytic therapy. While the role of catheter-directed therapy is still being developed, four important prospective studies have demonstrated its safety and efficacy. Additional studies comparing short- and long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with catheter-directed therapy versus anticoagulation are the next step in understanding its role within the management of submassive pulmonary embolism. Furthermore, multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams, in which interventional radiology plays a crucial role, are becoming essential to appropriately managing pulmonary embolism patients, including selection of those who may benefit from catheter-directed therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Right heart thrombi (RiHT) is characterized by the presence of thrombus within the right atrium or right ventricle (RV). Current literature suggests pulmonary embolism (PE) with RiHT carries a high mortality. Guidelines lack recommendations in managing RiHT. We created a pooled analysis on RiHT and report on our institutional experience in managing RiHT. We aimed to evaluate whether patient characteristics and differing treatment modalities predict mortality. Methods: We created a pooled analysis of case reports and series of patients with RiHT and PE between January 1956 and 2017. We also reviewed a series of consecutive patients with RiHT identified from our institutional PE registry. Age, shock, RV dysfunction, clot mobility, treatment modality, and hospital outcome had to be reported. Results: We identified 316 patients in our pooled analysis. Patients received the following therapies: no treatment 15 (5%), systemic anticoagulation 73 (23%), systemic thrombolysis 108 (34%), surgical embolectomy 101 (32%), catheter-directed therapy 11 (3%), and systemic thrombolysis with surgery 8 (3%). In-hospital mortality was 18.7%. Univariate analysis showed age and shock reduced odds of survival. Multivariate analysis showed shock reduced odds of survival (odds ratios [OR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.72, P ≤ .01) while age, RV dysfunction, and clot-mobility did not affect mortality. In a reduced multivariate analysis adjusting for shock, treatment modality, and clot location alone, systemic thrombolysis increased odds of survival when compared to systemic anticoagulation (OR 2.72, 95% CI: 1.11-6.64, P = .02). Our institutional series identified 18 patients, where in-hospital mortality was 22.2%, 18 (100%) had RV dysfunction, and 5 (28%) had shock. Patients received the following therapies: systemic anticoagulation 8 (44.4%), systemic thrombolysis 4 (22.2%), surgical embolectomy 4 (22.2%), and catheter-directed thrombolysis 2 (11.1%). Conclusion: Presence of shock in RiHT is an independent predictor of mortality. Systemic thrombolysis may offer increased odds of survival when compared to systemic anticoagulation. Our findings should be interpreted with caution as they derive from retrospective reports and subject to publication bias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a major public health problem and accounts for 100,000-180,000 deaths per year in the United States. Current prognostic stratification separates acute PE into massive, submassive, and low-risk by the presence or absence of sustained hypotension, RV dysfunction, and myocardial necrosis. Massive, submassive and low-risk PE have mortality rates of 25-65%, 3%, and < 1%, respectively. In this review we will focus on therapies currently available to manage acute massive and submassive PE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Catheter directed therapies (CDT) are widely used in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). A multicenter registry was organized to evaluate their application in real life and to determine efficacy and safety of these procedures. Local experience of participating centers in percutaneous techniques for PE treatment was assessed., Methods: An internet-based registry was designed to collect clinical, echocardiographic and laboratory data of consecutive PE patients treated with CDT in participating centers between 2017 and 2022., Results: Under analysis were 145 consecutive patients with acute PE, aged 61 ± 15 years, treated with CDT in 7 centers: 50 (34.5%) patients with high-risk PE (HRPE), and 95 (65.5%) patients with intermediate-high risk PE (IHRPE). 100 (69%) patients were treated with dedicated devices, in 45 (31%) subjects a pigtail catheter was used. Total PE or CDT related in-hospital mortality in HRPE reached 14% (7 patients), while in IHRPE 3.2% (3 patients) (p = 0.032). 50% of PE or CDT related deaths occurred in patients treated with a pigtail catheter. All-cause mortality in 145 patients was 9.7%, and it was higher in HRPE than in IHRPE (18% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.019). The use of pigtail catheters compared to dedicated systems was associated with higher mortality (20% vs. 5%, p = 0.01)., Conclusions: Catheter directed therapies is a real option of treating PE. It was used as primary therapy also in patients without contraindication for thrombolysis suggesting that clinical practice does not always follow current PE guidelines. Patients treated with dedicated CDT systems had a higher survival rate than subjects treated with pigtail catheters.

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a major public health problem. It is the third most common cause of death in hospitalized patients. In the United States, there are up to 600,000 cases diagnosed per year with 100,000-180,000 acute PE-related deaths. Common risk factors include underlying genetic conditions, acquired conditions, and acquired hypercoagulable states. Acute PE increases the pulmonary vascular resistance and the load on the right ventricle (RV). Increased RV loading causes compensatory RV dilation, impaired contractility, tachycardia, and sympathetic activation. RV dilation and increased intramural pressure decrease diastolic coronary blood flow, leading to RV ischemia and myocardial necrosis. Ultimately, insufficient cardiac output from the RV causes left ventricular under-filling which results in systemic hypotension and cardiovascular collapse. Current prognostic stratification strategy separates acute PE into massive, submassive, and low-risk by presence or absence of sustained hypotension, RV dysfunction, and myocardial necrosis. Massive, submassive, and low-risk acute PE have mortality rates of 25%-65%, 3%, and <1%, respectively. Current PE management includes the use of anticoagulation alone, systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed thrombolysis, and surgical embolectomy. This article will describe the current state of practice for catheter-directed thrombolysis and its role in the management of acute PE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is currently the third leading cause of death and moreover is likely underdiagnosed. PE remains the most common preventable cause of hospital deaths in the United States, which may be attributable to its diagnostic challenges. Although difficult to diagnose, patient mortality rates are time-dependent, and thus, the suspicion and diagnosis of PE in a timely manner is imperative. Diagnosis based on several criteria which may dictate imaging workup as well as laboratory tests and clinical parameters are discussed. The evolution of treatment guidelines via various clinical trials and recommendations is outlined, setting the stage for the use of fibrinolytics, whether systemic or catheter directed. Treatment, including fibrinolytics, is predicated on patient triage into three large categories--massive, submassive, or low-risk PE. Additionally, a relatively new concept of a multidisciplinary team composed of several subspecialty experts known as the PE response team (PERT) is discussed. PERT's timely and unified recommendations have been shown to optimize care and decrease mortality while tailoring treatment to each individual afflicted by PE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Catheter-directed therapy (CDT) is included in the guidelines for diagnosing and treating massive pulmonary embolism. However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of CDT as a treatment for submassive pulmonary embolism (SPE). Therefore, we used evidence-based medicine to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CDT in treating SPE. Methods Search terms describing CDT in SPE and patients with intermediate pulmonary embolism were entered into the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant articles without language restrictions published between January 1990 and December 2016. A quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two investigators. The clinical efficacy of and major complications associated with treatment were analysed using a fixed effects model. Key findings A total of 552 patients in 16 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The clinical success rate in CDT was approximately 100% (95% confidence interval (CI): 99%, 100%), the primary bleeding rate was 0.02% (95% CI: 0%, 0.05%), and mortality during hospitalization was approximately 0% (95% CI: 0%, 0.01%). The mean decrease in pulmonary artery systolic pressure after treatment was − 14.9% (95% CI: − 19.25%, − 10.55%), and the mean post-treatment change in the ratio of the right to the left ventricle (RV/LV) was − 0.35% (95% CI: − 0.48%, − 0.22%). Significance CDT is effective and safe as a treatment for SPE and could be a first-line treatment for SPE under specific conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The clinical presentation of a patient with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) can be classified into 3 categories: low-risk, submassive (presence of right heart strain), and massive (hemodynamic compromise). Massive PE is associated with high morbidity or mortality and typically treated with systemic intravenous thrombolysis. Over the last 2 decades, however, catheter-directed techniques have become an increasingly popular treatment modality for patients with a contraindication to systemic thrombolysis or without clinical improvement after systemic thrombolysis. Furthermore, endovascular treatment for patients with submassive PE has been of great interest due to the significantly increased mortality associated with right heart strain, and prospective clinical trials have demonstrated catheter-directed thrombolysis to decrease right heart strain earlier than systemic anticoagulation alone. This article describes available devices and endovascular techniques used to treat patients with massive and submassive acute PE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mechanism of ultrasound thrombolysis (UT) is generally attributed to cavitation. The insufficiency of microbubbles (MB) to serve as cavitation nuclei in the vessel-obstructing thrombi significantly reduces the effectiveness of UT. Taking advantage of the widely performed catheter-directed therapy (CDT), in a thrombo-embolized rabbit IVC model with a simultaneous catheter directed rt-PA thrombolysis procedure, guided moderate mechanical index longer pulses from a modified diagnostic ultrasound transducer, combined with an intraclot infusion of MB, significantly accelerated the thrombolysis process. The higher thrombolysis efficacy score and consistent elevated post-treatment plasma concentration level of D-Dimer, a product of fibrinolysis, both indicated the superiority of CDT + UT over CDT/UT alone. Pathologic examination of the treated occluded IVC segments revealed an almost complete dissolution of the thrombi treated with CDT + UT. There was no evidences of thrombo-embolism or local thrombus formation in the cardiac-pulmonary vessels. Combined with intraclot infusion of MB, guided longer pulse ultrasound from a diagnostic transducer is able to safely and significantly improve a catheter-directed thrombolysis procedure. It thus has the potential to achieve earlier clot removal, administration of a lower dosage of thrombolytic agent and, consequently, a lower incidence of thrombolysis-related side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. Prior studies have evaluated the role of systemic fibrinolysis and catheter-directed therapy (CDT) in the management of PE. In this review, we examine current data on risk stratification and the appropriate allocation of systemic fibrinolysis and CDT in acute PE patients with elevated risk of adverse outcomes. Recent Findings: Classification of pulmonary embolism is based on risk of adverse events, and relies on clinical parameters, imaging findings, and biomarkers. The synthesis of this data permits appropriate risk stratification of acute PE patients, and is the foundation upon which treatment decisions are made. While systemic thrombolytics remain the frontline therapy for hemodynamically unstable PE patients, studies have suggested that CDT has a significant promise as the primary modality for treating hemodynamically stable patients at increased risk for clinical decompensation and as an alternative therapy for hemodynamically unstable patients who may not tolerate systemic thrombolytics. Summary: The appropriate use of CDT in patients with acute PE is dependent on accurate risk stratification. CDT offers the potential to reduce excessive bleeding while maintaining the efficacy of systemic thrombolytics, but will require data from larger randomized trials to support its use prior to widespread adoption as the frontline therapy for PE in patients at elevated risk of adverse outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Reduction in distal vascular volume in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant predictor of 30- and 90-day mortality. The likely cause of this is pulmonary arterial obstruction. The effect of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PM-CDT) on the occlusions of these pulmonary artery (PA) branches is not known., Objectives: The RESCUE study evaluated PM-CDT with the Bashir endovascular catheter in patients with acute intermediate-risk PE. This analysis assessed PA occlusions using core laboratory data before and after PM-CDT therapy., Methods: The baseline and 48-hour post-treatment contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography angiography of PE patients with right ventricular dilatation enrolled in the RESCUE trial were used. The primary analysis was the change in the number of segmental and proximal PA branches with total or subtotal (>65%) occlusions after 48 hours compared to baseline using McNemar's test., Results: A total of 107 patients enrolled across 18 United States sites comprised this analysis. At 48 hours post-PM-CDT, the number of segmental PA branches with total or subtotal occlusions decreased from 40.5% to 11.7% ( P < 0.0001). Proximal PA branch total or subtotal occlusions decreased from 28.7% to 11.0% ( P < 0.0001). The reduction in segmental artery occlusions correlated significantly with the magnitude of reduction in right ventricular/left ventricular ratio (correlation coefficient of 0.287 [95% CI: 0.102-0.452]; P = 0.0026), whereas that in the proximal PA arteries did not (correlation coefficient of 0.132 [95% CI: 0.059-0.314] P = 0.173)., Conclusions: PM-CDT with the Bashir catheter was associated with a significant reduction in total and subtotal occlusion of segmental and proximal PAs., Competing Interests: AUTHOR DISCLOSURES All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Background: Driven by the ability to avoid thrombolytics and provide a one stop procedure with immediate hemodynamic improvement, there has been a dramatic increase in the use of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) devices for the treatment of intermediate-to-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE). This study investigated the incidence and outcomes of cardiovascular collapse during MT procedures and demonstrates the role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in salvaging patients., Methods: This single-center retrospective review included patients with PE undergoing MT with the FlowTriever device between 2017 and 2022. Patients presenting periprocedural cardiac arrest were identified and their perioperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were evaluated., Results: A total of 151 patients with a mean age of 64 ± 14 years who presented with intermediate-to-high risk PE received LBAT procedures during the study period. The simplified PE severity score was ≥1 in 83% of cases and the average RV/LV ratio was 1.6 ± 0.5, with and elevated troponin in 84%. Technical success was achieved in 98.7% and a significant decrease in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) was observed (37 mm Hg vs 56 mm Hg; P < .0001). Intraoperative cardiac arrest occurred in nine patients (6%). These patients were more likely to present PASP of ≥70 mm Hg (84% vs 14%; P < .001), were more hypotensive upon admission (systolic of 94 ± 14 mm Hg vs 119 ± 23 mm Hg; P = .004), presented lower oxygen saturation levels (87 ± 6% vs 92 ± 6%; P = .023) and were more likely to present with a history of recent surgery (67% vs 18%; P = .004). Four patients were rescued successfully with ECMO and their residual PE was subsequently removed before discharge by surgical embolectomy in two of the four cases and repeat MT in the other two. All five patients (3%) who did not receive ECMO support expired intraoperatively. The overall 30-day mortality was 8% with no death occurring in patients who were salvaged with ECMO., Conclusions: Large-bore aspiration thrombectomy for acute PE is associated with favorable technical outcomes, but the concern for acute cardiac decompensation is non-negligible in patients presenting with high-risk features and a PASP of ≥70 mm Hg. ECMO can help to salvage some of these patients and should be considered in the treatment algorithms of patients deemed at high risk., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)