Search

A molecular survey was conducted to understand recent distribution of pathogens associated with canine infectious respiratory disease (CIRD) in Japan. Nasal and/or pharyngeal swabs were collected from asymptomatic dogs and those with CIRD, living in private house or in kennels. PCR-based examination was conducted for detecting nine pathogens. Among private household dogs, 50.8% with CIRD, 11.1% with respiratory disease other than CIRD, and 4.3% asymptomatic were positive for more than one pathogen, whereas in kennel-housed dogs, 42.9% with CIRD and 27.3% asymptomatic were positive. Bordetella bronchiseptica was most frequently detected, followed by canine herpesvirus 1, canine parainfluenza virus, canine pneumovirus, Mycoplasma cynos, and canine adenovirus type 2. In kennel environment, asymptomatic dogs might act as reservoirs carrying the respiratory pathogens.

Raccoons (Procyon lotor) are found worldwide. They are frequently seen in crowded inner cities as well as in forests or wooded areas, often living in proximity to humans and their pets. We examined sera from 100 wild raccoons in Japan for antibodies to six canine viruses with veterinary significance to assess their potential as reservoirs. We also aimed to understand the distribution of potentially infected wildlife. We found that 7% of samples were seropositive for canine distemper virus (CDV), 10% for canine parvovirus type 2, 2% for canine adenovirus type 1, 6% for canine adenovirus type 2, and 7% for canine coronavirus. No samples were found to be seropositive for canine parainfluenza virus. Seropositivity rates for canine distemper virus and canine parvovirus type 2 were significantly different between areas, and younger raccoons (1 yr old) were more frequently seropositive than older raccoons. Because raccoons belong to the suborder Caniformia, similar to dogs (Canis lupus familiaris), our results suggest that they can act as reservoirs for some of these important canine viruses and might be involved in viral transmission. Further study should include isolation and analysis of canine viruses in wild raccoons from a wider area.

For the monitoring of six viral disease (CIV: canine influenzavirus, CPIV: canine parainfluenzavirus, CHV: canine herpesvirus, CPV2: canine parvovirus type 2, CCoV: canine coronavirus, CNV: canine norovirus) inspections, a total of 300 samples were collected nasal or feces from the companion dogs of animal hospital (n=98) and the abandoned dogs of animal shelters (n=202) in Gwangju, Korea. Using PCR and RT-PCR, CPV2, CPIV and CHV were detected in 55 (18.3%), 11 (3.7%), 1 (0.3%), respectively. CPV2 was highly detected in May, October and November. and CPIV was highly detected in November. But those agents were not detected the virus in March and July. Based on the results of the investigation continuous monitoring for companion and abandoned dogs will be required. Key words : Companion dogs, Abandoned dogs, Canine parvovirus type 2, Canine parainfluenza virus, Canine herpes virus 서 론 최근 반려동물에 대한 선호도가 높아지면서 가정에서 기르는 동물의 사육두수가 꾸준히 증가하고 있는가 하면 사육 포기 등으로 유기동물도 증가하는 추세다. 반려동물은 인간의 가족개념으로 행복과 슬픔, 질병에 대한 고통 그리고 죽음이 서로를 가를 때 까지 진정한 가족의 일원으로 살아가고 있다. 더불어 사람처럼 반려동물에서도 바이러스성 질병이 지속적으로 발생하고 있다. 특히 가족과 함께 생활하는 반려동물의 생활환경에서 보면 사람과 동물이 함께 감염원이 되는 경우가 빈번하다. 호흡기 질병인 인플루엔자 감염은 사람과 동물이 교차 감염을 발생시킬 수 있는 위험성이 크다(Chen 등, 2010). 또한, 음식물의 공유로 소화기 질병이 발생할 수 있는 환경을 갖고 있다. 바이러스는 신속하고 광범위하게 감염원을 일으키는 특성을 지니고 있다. Koh 등(2007)에 의해 광주지역 유기견 외부기생충 감염률 조사, 광주지역 심장사상충과 개 브루셀라병 감염실태 조사가 된 바 있다. 따라서 동물보호소의 유기동물을 대상으로 기생충성, 세균성에 대한 제한적 실태 파악이 이루어진바 시민과 함께 하는 반려동물의 바이러스 질병에 대한 실태 파악이 필요한 시점이다. 특히 반려동물의 97.8%를 차지하는 반려견의 바이러스질병에 대한 조사 및 발생 예측이 필요한 실정이다(국립수의과학검역원, 2007b). 개 인플루엔자바이러스(CIV, canine influenzavirus)의 H3N2 type은 한국에서 2007년 5월에 첫 발생이 보

Eight puppies (group 1) were vaccinated once with a bivalent modified-live vaccine against infectious tracheobronchitis by the intranasal route and at the same time with an injectable trivalent vaccine against canine parvovirus, canine distemper virus and canine adenovirus; a second group of eight puppies (group 2) was vaccinated only with the intranasal bivalent vaccine, and a further eight puppies (group 3) were vaccinated only with the injectable trivalent vaccine. Three weeks later they were all challenged with wild-type Bordetella bronchiseptica and canine parainfluenza virus by the aerosol route, and their antibody responses to the five vaccine organisms were determined. Oronasal swabs were taken regularly before and after the challenge for the isolation of bacteria and viruses, and the puppies were observed for clinical signs for three weeks after the challenge. There were no significant differences in the puppies9 titres against canine parvovirus, canine distemper virus and canine adenovirus type 2 between the groups vaccinated with or without the bivalent intranasal vaccine. After the challenge the mean clinical scores of the two groups vaccinated with the intranasal vaccine were nearly 90 per cent lower (P=0·001) than the mean score of the group vaccinated with only the trivalent injectable vaccine, and the puppies in this group all became culture-positive for B bronchiseptica and canine parainfluenza virus. There were only small differences between the rates of isolation of B bronchiseptica from groups 1, 2 and 3, but significantly lower yields of canine parainfluenza virus were isolated from groups 1 and 2 than from group 3.

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico The respiratory viruses of dogs are associated with a disease called canine infectious respiratory disease (CIRD). The main etiological agents of CIRD are canine distemper virus (CDV), canine parainfluenza virus (cPIV), canine adenovirus type 2 and canid herpesvirus type 1 (CaHV-1), which may cause single or mixed infections. CIRD occurs most frequently in places with high animal density and constant movement. CDV, cPIV, CAdV-2 and CaHV-1 infections have been described worldwide, however, few reports of molecular identification of these viruses are available in Brazil. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate the occurrence of respiratory viruses in dogs in Santa Maria, RS, and in dog shelters in RS, trying to correlate their occurrence with the environmental conditions. Nasal secretions were collected from dogs with respiratory signs submitted to veterinary clinics in Santa Maria; and from dogs of three shelters of RS (Cachoeira do Sul [shelters #1 and #2] and Passo Fundo [shelter #3]). Viral detection/identification was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for CDV, cPIV, CAdV-2 and CaHV-1. Positive samples were sequenced and, for some viruses, phylogenetic analysis was performed, comparing with sequences deposited in GenBank. Samples of shelters #1 and #3 were obtained during the cold season. Shelter #1 presented poor sanitary and nutrition conditions, high animal density and constant direct contact among dogs. In this shelter 78% (58/74) of the respiratory samples were positive for at least one virus. The single infections were caused by cPIV in 30% (22/74) of the samples and CAdV-2 in 5% (4/74). Coinfections represented 23% (cPIV and CAdV-2); 13% cPIV, CDV and CAdV-2; 4% cPIV-2 and CDV; and 3% CDV and CAdV-2. Shelters #2 and #3 presented satisfactory sanitary and nutrition conditions, with large outdoors exercise areas (#2) and animal separation by groups (#3). In shelter #2, 8% (5/35) of the samples were positive to cPIV and 6% to CaHV-1; in shelter #3, 8% (7/77) of the samples were positive to CAdV-2 and 1% to CDV. Of samples obtained in Santa Maria, 40% (10/25) were positive for virus, being 28% (7/25) for cPIV, and 4% (1/25) to each of the other viruses. Thus, the results obtained demonstrate that infections and coinfections by respiratory viruses are common in shelter dogs in RS, and their occurrence is related to population density, health and nutritional conditions and season. These viruses are also circulating in domestic dogs in Santa Maria, associated with respiratory disease. This study reinforces the importance of preventive measures such as vaccination and good environmental conditions to prevent/reduce infections caused by respiratory viruses in dogs. Os vírus respiratórios de cães estão associados com uma enfermidade denominada doença respiratória infecciosa canina (canine infectious respiratory disease - CIRD). Os principais agentes da CIRD são o vírus da cinomose (canine distemper virus - CDV), vírus da parainfluenza canina tipo 2 (canine parainfluenza virus - cPIV), adenovírus canino tipo 2 (canine adenovirus type 2 - CAdV-2) e herpesvírus canino tipo 1 (canid herpesvirus 1 - CaHV-1), que podem causar infecções simples ou mistas. A CIRD ocorre com maior frequência em locais com alta densidade populacional e constante fluxo de animais. Infecções pelo CDV, cPIV, CAdV-2 e CaHV-1 tem sido descritas em vários países, contudo, são escassos os relatos da identificação molecular desses agentes no Brasil. Além disso, há falta de estudos relacionados aos fatores que favorecem a ocorrência e disseminação desses agentes em cães de abrigos. Desta forma, o objetivo do presente estudo foi investigar a ocorrência de vírus respiratórios em cães do município de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, e em cães de abrigos, buscando-se associar a ocorrência das infecções com as condições ambientais. Para isso, foram coletadas secreções nasais de cães com sinais respiratórios em clínicas veterinárias de Santa Maria; e de cães de três abrigos do estado do RS (dois em Cachoeira do Sul [#1 e #2] e um em Passo Fundo [#3]). A identificação viral foi realizada por reação em cadeia de polimerase (PCR) para o CDV, cPIV, CAdV-2 e CaHV-1. As amostras positivas foram sequenciadas e, para alguns vírus, foi realizada a análise filogenética, comparando-se com sequências depositadas no GenBank. As amostras dos abrigos #1 e #3 foram obtidas durante épocas de baixas temperaturas. O abrigo #1 apresentava condições sanitárias e nutricionais precárias, além de alta densidade populacional e constante contato entre os cães. Neste abrigo, 78% (58/74) das amostras foram positivas para, pelo menos, um dos vírus investigados. As infecções simples foram causadas pelo cPIV em 30% (22/74) das amostras e CAdV-2 em 5% (4/74). As coinfecções totalizaram 23% (17/74) para o cPIV e CAdV-2; 13% (10/74) para o cPIV, CDV e CAdV-2; 4% (3/74) para o cPIV e CDV; e 3% (2/74) para o CDV e CAdV-2. Os abrigos #2 e #3 eram higienizados corretamente e os cães recebiam alimentação adequada, sendo que no abrigo #2 os animais possuíam amplo espaço para se exercitarem, e no abrigo #3 os animais eram separados em grupos e alojados em gaiolas. No abrigo #2 foram detectadas 8% de amostras positivas para o cPIV e 6% para o CaHV-1; e no abrigo #3, 8% de amostras positivas para o CAdV-2 e 1% para o CDV. Das amostras obtidas em clínicas de Santa Maria, 40% (10/25) foram positivas para um dos vírus pesquisados, sendo 28% (7/25) para o cPIV, e 4% (1/25) para cada um dos outros vírus. Assim, os resultados obtidos demonstram que infecções e coinfecções por vírus respiratórios são comuns em cães de abrigos no estado do RS, estando relacionadas com a densidade populacional, condições sanitárias e nutricionais e estação do ano. Estes vírus também circulam em cães domésticos em Santa Maria, estando associados com doença respiratória. Este estudo reforça a importância de medidas de prevenção, tendo em vista que a vacinação e boas condições ambientais podem reduzir e/ou prevenir as infecções causadas por vírus respiratórios em cães.

A study of the incubation period and clinical signs of kennel cough was undertaken by collating and analysing information obtained by postal questionnaires from a random sample of general veterinary practitioners in the United Kingdom. Agent-specific incubation periods were inferred from the vaccinal status of affected dogs. The mean and range of the incubation period for Bordetella bronchiseptica infection were 6-5 days and two to 14 days, respectively; similar descriptive statistics for canine parainfluenza virus (CPIV) infection were 4–5 days and one to eight days. Local clinical signs (cough, nasal discharge and gagging/retching) were present in animals in all vaccinal categories. One or more systemic clinical signs (pyrexia and anorexia) were identified in 32 per cent of cases. No association was detected between vaccinal status against B bronchiseptica and CPIV, and clinical signs.

CANINE infectious respiratory disease (cird), also known as kennel cough, is a common complex respiratory infection in dogs ([Appel and Binn 1987][1]). Bordetella bronchiseptica, Mycoplasma species, canine parainfluenza virus, canine adenovirus type 2, canine herpesvirus and others have been

No presente estudo, foi realizada uma pesquisa em busca de anticorpos neutralizantes contra os vírus da cinomose (CDV) e da parainfluenza (CPIV) caninos em amostras de soro de 173 cães recolhidos a canis municipais em Novo Hamburgo (n=82) e Porto Alegre (n=91), RS. A pesquisa de anticorpos neutralizantes foi realizada pela técnica de soroneutralização frente a duas amostras vacinais de CDV (Rockborn e Snyder Hill) e frente a uma amostra de CPIV (V660). Em relação ao CDV, 95,9% das amostras de soros foram negativas para anticorpos neutralizantes contra a amostra Snyder Hill e 90,7% soronegativas para a amostra Rockborn. Entre os soropositivos (n=20; 11,6%), somente três deles apresentaram anticorpos neutralizantes frente às duas amostras de CDV testadas, indicando pouca reatividade cruzada entre as mesmas. Quanto ao CPIV, a prevalência de anticorpos neutralizantes encontrada frente à amostra V660 foi de 51,4%. Esses achados indicam que a maioria dos cães examinados não teve contato prévio com o CDV, seja por infecção natural ou por imunização prévia. O CPIV, porém, parece estar amplamente difundido na população canina examinada, provavelmente por exposição natural ao vírus. In this report a serological survey was carried out in search for antibodies to canine distemper virus (CDV) and canine parainfluenza virus (CPIV) in 173 sera from dogs withdraw in kennels of the municipalities of Novo Hamburgo (n=82) and Porto Alegre (n=91), RS, Brazil. Neutralizing antibodies were evaluated against two CDV strains used for vaccine production (Rockborn and Snyder Hill) as well as one strain of CPIV (V660). Search for anti-CDV neutralizing antibodies revealed that 95.9% of sera were negative for antibodies to CDV Snyder Hill and 90.7% were negative for antibodies to CDV Rockborn. Among the positive sera (n=20; 11.6 %) only three of those had neutralizing antibodies to both CDV strains, indicating a low degree of cross reactivity between those. As regards CPIV, neutralizing antibodies to V660 were detected in 51.4% of sera. These findings suggest that the majority of the dogs from the populations examined in the present study had not previous contact with CDV, either by natural infection or by previous immunization. CPIV, on its turn, seem to be widespread within these populations, most likely by natural exposure to the virus.

O vírus da cinomose canina (CDV) e o vírus parainfluenza canino (CPIV) afetam uma ampla variedade de hospedeiros e encontram-se distribuídos mundialmente. O CDV é considerado um dos mais importantes agentes infecciosos dentro das populações caninas. Este vírus é o agente causal da cinomose, uma doença potencialmente letal em membros das famílias Canidae, Mustelidae e Procionidae, sendo recentemente detectado como causa de morbidade e mortalidade em carnívoros aquáticos e grandes felinos. O CPIV, por sua vez, é altamente contagioso entre cães, podendo infectar roedores e gatos em infecções experimentais. Geralmente, o CPIV produz uma traqueobronquite aguda auto-limitante, porém pode atuar sinergicamente com outros agentes infecciosos, como o CDV, causando sinais clínicos mais graves. Como em nosso meio são escassas as informações sobre estes vírus, o presente estudo visou aprofundar os conhecimentos sobre a prevalência de CDV e CPIV em cães e felinos silvestres mantidos em cativeiro. Para tanto, soros destes animais foram testados em busca de anticorpos neutralizantes contra amostras padrão do CDV (Rockborn e Snyder Hill) e do CPIV (V660). Inicialmente, foram testados soros de 173 cães de rua mantidos em canis municipais em Novo Hamburgo e Porto Alegre, RS. A prevalência de anticorpos neutralizantes anti-CDV frente às amostras de vírus da cinomose Rockborn e Snyder Hill, foi de 9,3 % e 4,1 %, respectivamente. Somente dois cães apresentaram títulos de anticorpos considerados protetores contra CDV Rockborn (igual ou maior que 100) e nenhum soro apresentou título de anticorpos neutralizantes considerado protetor para a amostra Snyder Hill (igual ou maior que 100). Contra a amostra de parainfluenza canino V660, a prevalência de anticorpos neutralizantes encontrada foi de 51,4 %. Conclui-se, portanto, que a população de cães de rua amostrada apresenta poucos indícios de contato prévio com CDV, sugerindo grande susceptibilidade à cinomose. Por outro lado, o CPIV parece circular amplamente nesta população. Na segunda parte do presente estudo, como no Brasil não existem relatos sobre CDV e CPIV em felinos silvestres, buscou-se verificar a possibilidade da ocorrência dessas infecções em felinos silvestres brasileiros. Para tanto, foram testados soros de 84 felinos silvestres de seis diferentes espécies nativas do Brasil (Leopardus tigrinus, Puma concolor, Leopardus wiedii, Herpailurus yaguarondi, Panthera onca), todos mantidos em cativeiro em criatórios de distintas regiões do País. Todos os felinos amostrados apresentaram-se soronegativos frente às amostras de CDV e CPIV utilizadas. Estes resultados indicam que CDV e CPIV parecem não circular nas populações de felinos silvestres amostradas. Canine distemper virus (CDV) and canine parainfluenza virus (CPIV) infect a great variety of hosts ranges and are distributed worldwide. CDV is one of the most important infectious agents in dogs. This virus may cause potentially lethal disease among members of the Canidae, Mustelidae and Procionidae families. It has also caused diseases of significant morbidity and mortality in aquatic carnivores and large felids. CPIV, on its turn, is highly contagious among dogs, whilst rodents and cats are susceptible to experimental infections. CPIV is usually associated with an acute selflimiting tracheobronchitis. However, it can act sinergistically with other infectious agents, such as CDV, and cause clinical signs of variable severity. As information on CDV and CPIV infections in our millieu are scarce, this study was carried out aiming to increase knowledge on the prevalence of CDV and CPIV in stray dogs as well as in captive Brazilian wild felids. In order to have an estimate on such prevalences, sera from these animals were tested for neutralizing antibodies to CDV strains Rockborn and Snyder Hill, and to CPIV strain V660. Initially, 173 sera from stray dogs kept in kennels from the municipalities of Novo Hamburgo and Porto Alegre, RS, were examined. The prevalences of neutralizing antibodies to CDV strains Rockborn and Snyder Hill were 9.3 % and 4.1 %, respectively. Only two dogs had antibody levels which could be correlated to protection (that is, titre ≥ 100) to CDV Rockborn whereas no sera presented antibody titres high enough to be considered protective to CDV strain Snyder Hill (that is, titre ≥ 100). Regarding CPIV, the prevalence of anti-V660 neutralizing antibodies was 51.4 %. It can be concluded that the stray dog populations under study shows few serological evidence of previous contact with CDV and seem largely susceptible to CDV infections. On the other hand, CPIV seems to circulate widely in the examined population. In the second part of this study, as there are no reports on CDV and CPIV infections in wild felids in Brazil, it was aimed to determine whether there would be any evidence of such infections among some of such species. For that, 84 sera from wild felids of six different Brazilian native species (Leopardus tigrinus, Puma concolor, Leopardus wiedii, Herpailurus yaguarondi, Panthera onca), all kept in captivity in different regions of the country, were tested for neutralizing antibodies to both CDV and CPIV. All wild felid sera tested were negative for antibodies to the two strains of CDV as well as to CPIV. These results indicate that CDV and CPIV do not seem to circulate among the wild felid populations examined.

Twelve specific pathogen-free (spf) puppies were vaccinated intranasally with a bivalent, modified live vaccine against infectious tracheobronchitis (group 1) and six puppies of the same age and from the same source served as unvaccinated controls (group 2). Both groups were challenged with wild-type Bordetella bronchiseptica and canine parainfluenza virus by the aerosol route 56 weeks after group 1 had been vaccinated, and at the same time six 10-week-old spf puppies from the same source (group 3) were also challenged. Oronasal swabs were taken regularly before and after the challenge, for the isolation of bacteria and viruses, and the dogs were observed for clinical signs for three weeks after the challenge. The control dogs became culture-positive for B bronchiseptica and canine parainfluenza virus, but the isolation yields from the vaccinated group were significantly lower (P

A case-control study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of several vaccines in protecting against canine kennel cough. Cases and controls were selected from a random sample of veterinary practices in the UK, and relevant information was collected using postal questionnaires. The relationship between vaccinal status and the occurrence of kennel cough was examined using a linear logistic model. Vaccination against Bordetella bronchiseptica and canine parainfluenza virus was associated with reduced risks of the disease, as indicated by a decrease in the log odds (log relative risk) of disease in vaccinated animals, when integrated with usual vaccination strategies. Statistical interaction between these two vaccines and adenovirus vaccines was identified.

Two evaluation procedures for efficacy testing of modified canine parainfluenza virus master seed within the restrictions of the seed-lot principle test are described. It is concluded the evaluation by post-mortem examination for specific hemorrhagic lung lesions more nearly reflects the objective of the seed-lot principle test method than does reduced days of shedding virulent virus after challenge. The problems associated with the seed-lot principle test method when working with diseases which are difficult to reproduce or modified viruses which show a dose response are discussed.

Lytic stock virus (CPI+) exhibited prominent CPE in Vero cell monolayers. The non-syncytial giant cell forming strain (CPI-) was isolated from brain tissues of a dog after experimental infection with syncytial giant cell-forming (CPI+) virus. In mixed infection experiments, CPI(-) virus interfered with the replication of CPI(+) virus in that simultaneously infected cells showed strand-forming CPE typical of CPI(-) and reduction of CPI(+) yield. The CPI(-) virus established immediate in vitro persistence, followed by a severe crisis at passage (p) 8 and several similar crises until p 31; no further crises occurred throughout the remaining observation period (p 80). The CPI(+) did not establish immediate in vitro viral persistence and experienced several lytic crises until p 29. No further crises were observed throughout the observation period (p 100).

Gnotobiotic puppies were inoculated intracerebrally with a strain of canine parainfluenza virus (CPI-78–238). Four of eight dogs developed histological evidence of acute encephalitis. Clinical signs of encephalitis were seen in two of these four dogs; one had signs and lesions of interstitial pneumonia. Of six inoculated dogs observed for six months after infection, five developed internal hydrocephalus. Virus was reisolated from two dogs with acute encephalitis but not from dogs with hydrocephalus. Hemagglutination-inhibition antibodies persisted throughout the observation period of six months at high levels in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid of hydrocephalic dogs.

Canine parainfluenza (CPI) virus is a negative-stranded non-segmented RNA virus of the family Paramyxoviridae. It is associated with a highly communicable respiratory disease in the dog ( Rosenberg et al., 1971 ). In a recent investigation on the biochemical characterization of CPI viruses, Yonezawa (1984) reported that there were only small differences between virulent and attenuated strains. The present study investigated the restriction patterns of DNA transcribed from virus RNA, and thus achieved differential characterization of CPI virus strains by restriction analysis.