Search

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate switching from brimonidine and ripasudil, and brimonidine or ripasudil, to a fixed combination of brimonidine and ripasudil, and evaluate the associated efficacy and safety in glaucoma patients. Methods: Glaucoma patients undergoing treatment with at least brimonidine and ripasudil (n = 25) or treatment with at least brimonidine or ripasudil (n = 45) were evaluated in this retrospective study. After switching patients taking brimonidine and ripasudil, or brimonidine or ripasudil, to a ripasudil/brimonidine fixed-combination, ophthalmic suspension (RBFC), intra-ocular pressure (IOP), conjunctival hyperemia and superficial punctate keratopathy (SPK) were evaluated before and at 4, 12 and 24 weeks after switching to RBFC. Results: No significant differences in the IOPs were observed after switching from brimonidine and ripasudil to RBFC. However, a significant decrease was observed at 4, 12 and 24 weeks in the baseline IOP, from 17.0 ± 4.4 mmHg to 15.7 ± 3.2 mmHg (p < 0.01), 14.3 ± 3.4 mmHg (p < 0.01) and 14.4 ± 4.1 mmHg (p < 0.01), respectively, after switching from brimonidine or ripasudil to RBFC. No significant changes were noted for the SPK score or conjunctival hyperemia score at any of the visits after switching to RBFC. Conclusions: Throughout the 24-week evaluation period, the IOP was maintained after switching from brimonidine and ripasudil to RBFC. However, there was a significant decrease in the IOP after switching from brimonidine or ripasudil to RBFC. These results demonstrate that RBFC is safe for use in the treatment of glaucoma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To study the effect of brimonidine on vascular density and flow index of optic nerve head (ONH) and macula in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Methods: Twenty-three brimonidine-naïve POAG patients were started on brimonidine. They underwent OCTA ONH and macula before commencing brimonidine and one month thereafter. Systemic arterial blood pressure (SABP) and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured at each visit to calculate mean ocular perfusion pressure (MOPP). The OCT angiograms were analyzed using ImageJ software to calculate ONH and macular flow indices. Results: Thirty-seven eyes (23 patients) with a mean age of 56.7 ± 12.49 years were included of whom 60.8% were males. Brimonidine was associated with an increase in the superficial flow index (SFI) (P-value = 0.02) and optic nerve head flow index (ONHFI) (P-value = 0.01). Also, superficial vascular density (SVD) for whole image, superior-hemi and fovea increased (P-value = 0.03, 0.02, 0.03 respectively). ONH inferior-hemi vascular density decreased (P-value = 0.01) despite an increase in inferior quadrant retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) (P-value = 0.03). There was no statistically significant correlation between flow indices and MOPP at baseline and follow-up. A moderate negative correlation was found between SVD and DVD at the fovea and MOPP at baseline and follow-up (P-value = 0.03, 0.05) (P-value = 0.02, 0.01) respectively. Conclusions: Brimonidine was associated with an increase in SFI, ONHFI and SVD indicating improved GCC and RNFL perfusion in POAG. Despite the increase in inferior quadrant RNFLT, the concomitant decrease in inferior-hemi ONHVD precluded a conclusion of hemodynamically-mediated improvement of RNFLT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: Diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of blindness worldwide, characterized by neurovascular dysfunction. This study aimed to investigate the impact of brimonidine, a selective adrenoceptor agonist, on diabetic retinal neurodegeneration, recognizing the critical role of neurodegeneration in diabetic retinopathy. Materials and Methods: Streptozotocin-induced diabetes was established in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats to mimic diabetic retinopathy. Rats, except non-diabetic control rats, received topical applications of 0.15% brimonidine tartrate (treatment group) or balanced salt solution (diabetic control group) twice daily following diabetes induction. Each group comprised six randomly assigned animals. Retinal samples were analyzed using immunofluorescence staining, apoptosis assay, and western blot. Results: Topical brimonidine treatment reduced apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells at 8 weeks after induction of diabetes (p<0.05). Glial activation induced by diabetes was reduced by brimonidine treatment. Immunoblot and immunofluorescence assay revealed that the decrease in phospho-protein kinase B (AKT) level resulting from diabetes was also attenuated by brimonidine (p<0.05). Furthermore, brimonidine alleviated the decrease in antiapoptotic proteins [BCL2 apoptosis regulator (BCL2) and BCL-xl] induced by diabetes (p<0.05). Elevation of phospho-p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK) and p53 in diabetic rats were reduced by brimonidine (p<0.05). Additionally, brimonidine treatment attenuated the upregulation of the pro-apoptotic molecule BCL-2 associated X in retinas of diabetic rats (p<0.05). Conclusion: These findings suggest that topical brimonidine treatment may protect retinal ganglion cells in experimental diabetes by modulating the AKT pathway and reducing pro-apoptotic p38MAPK levels. This presents a potential neuroprotective approach in diabetes, offering the advantage of localized treatment without the added burden of oral medication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Bradycardia can have a number of different aetiologies, including as a side effect of medications. Brimonidine is a rare, but recognized, cause of bradycardia. Brimonidine is indicated in the treatment of facial erythema in rosacea when given as topical brimonidine gel (Mirvaso). It may also be administered as eye drops for raised intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Brimonidine is an alpha-2 agonist, which if systemically absorbed can present with bradycardia, hypotension, and dizziness. The authors are unaware of any other case reports regarding topical administration of Mirvaso in an adult and symptomatic bradycardia. Case summary We present the case of a 78-year-old man with a background of rosacea, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and hypertension who had two separate admissions with symptomatic bradycardia. Electrocardiograms showed sinus bradycardia with AV block first degree, with rate recorded as low as 31 b.p.m. during a syncopal episode. These episodes of symptomatic bradycardia were intermittent and had a temporal association with topical administration of Mirvaso. He had no further episodes of bradycardia on discontinuation of Mirvaso and has remained symptom free for over 6 months. Discussion The topical administration of Mirvaso should be avoided to broken or inflamed skin. This is owing to the increased risk of systemic absorption, which as in this case report, may present with bradycardia. This case reiterates the importance of completing a full medication history including all topical and parenteral medications in patients with arrhythmia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Glaucoma as one of the most common eye diseases can be a comorbid condition of an epithelial corneal defect of various etiologies. Maintaining an optimal level of ophthalmotonus includes the prescription of antiglaucoma drugs, including benzalkonium chloride-preserved drugs.The aim of the study. To compare the effect of antiglaucoma drugs, as well as benzalkonium chloride (BC), on a primary culture of human corneal epithelium and A549 immortalized cell line.Methods. The effect of brimonidine, dorzolamide and timolol (1/100, 1/50, 1/20 and 1/10 dilutions; exposure 24 hours) on a monolayer of a human corneal epithelial primary culture and A549 immortalized cell line was assessed by structural changes in cells (phase-contrast microscopy) and MTT assay data. The cytotoxic effect of BC was studied in concentrations corresponding to its content in these dilutions of the antiglaucoma drug. Using a model of a linear defect in the monolayer of a corneal epithelial primary culture and A549 immortalized cell line, the effects of brimonidine, dorzolamide and timolol (1/100 and 1/20 dilutions; exposure 48 hours) were assessed by cell migration activity.Results. Among drugs (BC-free), dorzolamide (1/50, 1/20 and 1/10 dilutions) causes minor structural changes in human corneal epithelium and A549 immortalized cell line; timolol (1/100, 1/50, 1/20 and 1/10 dilutions) causes minor structural changes in A549 immortalized cell line. Structural changes in both types of cells, a decrease in their metabolic and migration activity occur under the influence of dorzolamide, brimonidine and timolol (BC-preserved) in 1/100, 1/50, 1/20 and 1/10 dilutions. BC at the studied concentrations exhibits a similar effect.Conclusion. The cytotoxic effect of antiglaucoma drugs is caused by the presence of BC in their composition. Despite similar morphofunctional changes in cells, A549 immortalized cell line is more resistant to the effects of drugs than the human corneal epithelial primary culture. When using it as a cellular model, it is advisable to change the experimental conditions (duration of exposure and concentration of the studied drug).

Abstract Background Myopia is becoming a huge burden on the world’s public health systems. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of brimonidine in the treatment of form-deprivation myopia (FDM) and the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP) and myopia development. Methods Monocular form deprivation myopia (FDM) was induced in three-week-old pigmented male guinea pigs. They were treated with 3 different methods of brimonidine administration (eye drops, and subconjunctival or intravitreal injections). Four different concentrations of brimonidine were tested for each method (2µg/µL, 4µg/µL, 20µg/µL, and 40µg/µL). All treatments continued for a period of 21 days. Tonometry, retinoscopy, and A-scan ultrasonography were used to monitor intraocular pressure, refractive error and axial length (AL), respectively. Results Treatment with subconjunctival brimonidine at 40µg/µL, and intravitreal brimonidine at 2µg/µL and 4µg/µL, inhibited the development of FDM. The myopic refraction, excessive axial length, and elevation of IOP were significantly decreased. Brimonidine in eye drops was ineffective. Conclusion Brimonidine at appropriate doses significantly reduced the development of FD myopia in guinea pigs. The IOP may change with FD myopia.

Background: Myopia is becoming a huge burden on the world's public health systems. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of brimonidine in the treatment of form-deprivation myopia (FDM) and the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP) and myopia development. Methods: Monocular form deprivation myopia (FDM) was induced in three-week-old pigmented male guinea pigs. They were treated with 3 different methods of brimonidine administration (eye drops, and subconjunctival or intravitreal injections). Four different concentrations of brimonidine were tested for each method (2µg/µL, 4µg/µL, 20µg/µL, and 40µg/µL). All treatments continued for a period of 21 days. Tonometry, retinoscopy, and A-scan ultrasonography were used to monitor intraocular pressure, refractive error and axial length (AL), respectively. Results: Treatment with subconjunctival brimonidine at 40µg/µL, and intravitreal brimonidine at 2µg/µL and 4µg/µL, inhibited the development of FDM. The myopic refraction, excessive axial length, and elevation of IOP were significantly decreased. Brimonidine in eye drops was ineffective. Conclusion: Brimonidine at appropriate doses significantly reduced the development of FD myopia in guinea pigs. The IOP may change with FD myopia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of MN Opthalmology / MN Oftalmoloji is the property of Medical Network and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

A 32-year-old male, with juvenile open-angle glaucoma on chronic antiglaucoma therapy and recently introduced brimonidine eye drops to the treatment regimen, developed bilateral follicular conjunctivitis with subepithelial infiltrates (SEIs) initially resembling common infectious keratoconjunctivitis entities. The persistent nature of the conjunctivitis, the lack of positive conjunctival cultures, the absence of systemic symptoms, the full resolution of the condition upon discontinuation of antiglaucoma drops, and the commencement of topical steroids, along with the reappearance of SEIs upon reintroducing brimonidine; suggested an immune-mediated drug reaction secondary to a Benzalkonium chloride (BAK) preserved brimonidine tartrate 0.2% formulation. The interval between the initiation of brimonidine and the onset of the drug reaction was 13 months and shortened to 1 week upon re-exposure to the drug. The condition fully resolved without further sequelae off brimonidine. Brimonidine is notoriously known for causing ocular allergic reactions, the most common being follicular conjunctivitis, but very few reports exist describing its adverse effects on the cornea. This case highlights that brimonidine may directly or indirectly induce an immune reaction affecting the cornea in the form of SEIs. Brimonidine is, thus, capable of mimicking more commonly recognized infectious disease entities causing keratoconjunctivitis. This is the second report of a similar manifestation linked to its use.

Background: This case report is applicable to the field of ophthalmology because there is a paucity of medical literature related to the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of uveal effusion syndrome. This is an urgent concern because there are severe complications associated with this disease, including non-rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, angle closure glaucoma, and possible blindness. This report will fill clinical knowledge gaps using a patient example. Case presentation: A 68-year-old white male with multiple cardiovascular risk factors initially presented to the Eye Institute Urgent Care Clinic with new onset visual symptoms, including eye pain, eye lid swelling, redness, and tearing of his left eye. He had experienced a foreign body sensation in the left eye and bilateral floaters weeks prior to his presentation. The patient was examined, and vision was 20/30 in both eyes, and intraocular pressure was 46 in the right eye and 36 in the left eye. After initial assessment, including compression gonioscopy, intermittent angle closure glaucoma was suspected. He received oral diamox 500 mg, one drop of alphagan in both eyes, one drop of latanoprost in both eyes, one drop of dorzolamide in both eyes, and one drop of 2% pilocarpine in both eyes. There was only slight response in intraocular pressure. Owing to the bilateral angle closure, he underwent laser peripheral iridotomy to decrease intraocular pressure and open the angle that was found closed on gonioscopy. The patient was discharged on oral and topical glaucoma drops and scheduled for the glaucoma clinic. When he presented for follow-up in the glaucoma clinic, he was evaluated and noted to have bilateral narrow angles and intraocular pressure in the mid-twenties. A brightness scan (B-scan) was performed and was noted to have bilateral choroidal effusions, confirmed by Optos fundus photos. He was started on prednisone at 60 mg once per day (QD) with taper, continuation of oral and topical glaucoma medications, and a retina evaluation. Evaluation with a retina specialist showed resolving choroidal effusion in the left eye. He continued the prednisone taper as well as glaucoma drops as prescribed. Follow-up in the glaucoma clinic revealed a grade 3 open angle. He continued the prednisone taper, cosopt twice per day in both eyes, and discontinued brimonidine. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that was performed showed results that were remarkable. No hemorrhage or mass was present. Follow-up with the retina specialist found that the choroidal effusions had resolved completely. Conclusion: This case report emphasizes the value in early detection, keen diagnostic evaluation, and cross-collaboration between multiple ophthalmology specialists to optimize healthcare outcomes for patients with uveal effusion syndrome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brimonidine, a selective alpha-2 adrenergic agonist used for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma, has been shown to cause neurological side effects such as unresponsiveness, lethargy, hypoventilation, and stupor, mimicking opioid toxicity. We report one case of transient encephalopathy in a toddler, in whom accidental brimonidine toxicity was suspected and then confirmed by a toxicology study. The healthy 8-month-old girl was taken to the pediatric ER since she was drowsy and hypotonic with miosis. The computed tomography scan of her brain and toxicological workup of her blood and urine were negative. Starting from the fourth hour, the child progressively improved, and by the sixth hour, she recovered to a normal state of consciousness. A survey of available drugs within the child's reach showed the presence of brimonidine. Thus, ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) was applied to quantify the brimonidine in urine and plasma samples, showing levels of 8.40 ng/mL and 0.79 ng/mL, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first report to determine brimonidine levels in urine and plasma using UPLC-MS/MS. Insufficient knowledge on the part of family members about the potential hazards of an apparently innocuous, topical medication such as eye drops may put children at a greater risk of poisoning. Necessary warnings should be given to parents with greater care when prescribing this medication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although brimonidine is currently used in the clinical treatment of glaucoma and rosacea, research of the deep sedative effect on animals after systemic administration is reported firstly and has shown promising results. Methods: The median effective dose (ED50), the median lethal dose (LD50), and the therapeutic index of brimonidine for deep sedation and formalin stimulation assay were determined by various animal experiments. The effect of synergistic anesthesia in rabbits with brimonidine and chloral hydrate was preliminarily evaluated. Results: The ED50 of brimonidine for highly effective sedation by intraperitoneal injection in rats was calculated to be 2.05 mg kg−1 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.87 to 2.25 mg kg−1. The ED50 of brimonidine for deep sedation by intravenous and intrarectal injection in rabbits was calculated to be 0.087 mg kg−1 with a 95% CI of 0.084 to 0.091 mg kg−1 and 1.65 mg kg−1 with a 95% CI of 1.43 to 1.91 mg kg−1, respectively. The LD50 of intraperitoneal brimonidine injection in rats was calculated to be 468 mg kg−1 with a 95% CI of 441 to 497 mg kg−1 and a therapeutic index of 228. Brimonidine has a certain analgesic and heart rate lowering effects. Conclusion: The results confirmed that brimonidine has deep sedation and analgesic effects after systemic administration and has high safety. It can be used in combination with other types of sedative drugs to achieve better effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 32-year-old male, with juvenile open-angle glaucoma on chronic antiglaucoma therapy and recently introduced brimonidine eye drops to the treatment regimen, developed bilateral follicular conjunctivitis with subepithelial infiltrates (SEIs) initially resembling common infectious keratoconjunctivitis entities. The persistent nature of the conjunctivitis, the lack of positive conjunctival cultures, the absence of systemic symptoms, the full resolution of the condition upon discontinuation of antiglaucoma drops, and the commencement of topical steroids, along with the reappearance of SEIs upon reintroducing brimonidine; suggested an immune-mediated drug reaction secondary to a Benzalkonium chloride (BAK) preserved brimonidine tartrate 0.2% formulation. The interval between the initiation of brimonidine and the onset of the drug reaction was 13 months and shortened to 1 week upon re-exposure to the drug. The condition fully resolved without further sequelae off brimonidine. Brimonidine is notoriously known for causing ocular allergic reactions, the most common being follicular conjunctivitis, but very few reports exist describing its adverse effects on the cornea. This case highlights that brimonidine may directly or indirectly induce an immune reaction affecting the cornea in the form of SEIs. Brimonidine is, thus, capable of mimicking more commonly recognized infectious disease entities causing keratoconjunctivitis. This is the second report of a similar manifestation linked to its use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The ROCK inhibitor ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate was shown to have axonal protective effects in TNF-induced optic nerve degeneration. The α2-adrenoreceptor agonist brimonidine was also shown to exert axonal protection. The current study aimed to elucidate whether additive axonal protection was achieved by the simultaneous injection of ripasudil and brimonidine and examine the association with AMPK activation. Methods: Intravitreal administration was performed in the following groups: PBS, TNF, or TNF with ripasudil, with brimonidine, or with a combination of ripasudil and brimonidine. Axon numbers were counted to evaluate the effects against axon loss. Immunoblot analysis was performed to examine phosphorylated AMPK expression in optic nerves, and immunohistochemical analysis was performed to evaluate the expression levels of p-AMPK and neurofilament in the optic nerve. Results: Both ripasudil alone or brimonidine alone resulted in significant neuroprotection against TNF-induced axon loss. The combination of ripasudil and brimonidine showed additive protective effects. Combined ripasudil and brimonidine plus TNF significantly upregulated p-AMPK levels in the optic nerve compared with the TNF groups. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that p-AMPK is present in axons and enhanced by combination therapy. Conclusion: The combination of ripasudil and brimonidine may have additive protective effects compared with single-agent treatment alone. These protective effects may be at least partially associated with AMPK activation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease with a multifactorial pathogenesis. The wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes, including erythema, telangiectasia, inflammatory papules and pustules, and phyma, demand an individualized approach to treatment. This narrative review offers an updated reference for rosacea management by covering the latest developments in both topical and systemic treatments, including data from newly approved therapies, updates to current treatment modalities and ongoing clinical trials. Although use of benzoyl peroxide as a treatment for rosacea has typically been limited due to irritation, the improved tolerability due to microencapsulation of benzoyl peroxide 5% cream provides a new therapeutic option for patients with rosacea. Minocycline foam and topical ivermectin cream add to our armamentarium of treatment options, particularly for inflammatory papules and pustules. Sarecycline has a narrower spectrum of antibacterial activity, which might reduce the development of antibiotic resistance and disruption of the microbiome compared to other oral antibiotics. Brimonidine gel and oxymetazoline cream provide topical options for redness and flushing. There is emerging evidence about the role of hydroxychloroquine and intradermal botulinum toxin A, which may improve rosacea through their effects on mast cells. The clinical trials pipeline includes agents with a variety of mechanisms, including mast cell stabilization, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and vasoconstrictive effects. However, the clinical pipeline for rosacea appears limited, and there remain important unmet needs for patients with more recalcitrant rosacea or phymatous disease. In addition, there is a need for comparative effectiveness studies to identify the highest value treatment approaches for patients with rosacea.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate switching from brimonidine and ripasudil, and brimonidine or ripasudil, to a fixed combination of brimonidine and ripasudil, and evaluate the associated efficacy and safety in glaucoma patients. Methods: Glaucoma patients undergoing treatment with at least brimonidine and ripasudil (n = 25) or treatment with at least brimonidine or ripasudil (n = 45) were evaluated in this retrospective study. After switching patients taking brimonidine and ripasudil, or brimonidine or ripasudil, to a ripasudil/brimonidine fixed-combination, ophthalmic suspension (RBFC), intra-ocular pressure (IOP), conjunctival hyperemia and superficial punctate keratopathy (SPK) were evaluated before and at 4, 12 and 24 weeks after switching to RBFC. Results: No significant differences in the IOPs were observed after switching from brimonidine and ripasudil to RBFC. However, a significant decrease was observed at 4, 12 and 24 weeks in the baseline IOP, from 17.0 ± 4.4 mmHg to 15.7 ± 3.2 mmHg (p < 0.01), 14.3 ± 3.4 mmHg (p < 0.01) and 14.4 ± 4.1 mmHg (p < 0.01), respectively, after switching from brimonidine or ripasudil to RBFC. No significant changes were noted for the SPK score or conjunctival hyperemia score at any of the visits after switching to RBFC. Conclusions: Throughout the 24-week evaluation period, the IOP was maintained after switching from brimonidine and ripasudil to RBFC. However, there was a significant decrease in the IOP after switching from brimonidine or ripasudil to RBFC. These results demonstrate that RBFC is safe for use in the treatment of glaucoma patients.

Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease with a multifactorial pathogenesis. The wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes, including erythema, telangiectasia, inflammatory papules and pustules, and phyma, demand an individualized approach to treatment. This narrative review offers an updated reference for rosacea management by covering the latest developments in both topical and systemic treatments, including data from newly approved therapies, updates to current treatment modalities and ongoing clinical trials. Although use of benzoyl peroxide as a treatment for rosacea has typically been limited due to irritation, the improved tolerability due to microencapsulation of benzoyl peroxide 5% cream provides a new therapeutic option for patients with rosacea. Minocycline foam and topical ivermectin cream add to our armamentarium of treatment options, particularly for inflammatory papules and pustules. Sarecycline has a narrower spectrum of antibacterial activity, which might reduce the development of antibiotic resistance and disruption of the microbiome compared to other oral antibiotics. Brimonidine gel and oxymetazoline cream provide topical options for redness and flushing. There is emerging evidence about the role of hydroxychloroquine and intradermal botulinum toxin A, which may improve rosacea through their effects on mast cells. The clinical trials pipeline includes agents with a variety of mechanisms, including mast cell stabilization, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and vasoconstrictive effects. However, the clinical pipeline for rosacea appears limited, and there remain important unmet needs for patients with more recalcitrant rosacea or phymatous disease. In addition, there is a need for comparative effectiveness studies to identify the highest value treatment approaches for patients with rosacea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This article aims to describe a preclinical proof of concept for a novel once-a-day (OD) brimonidine ophthalmic nanosuspension. Methods: The preclinical proof of concept was established using New Zealand white rabbits as animal models. Dose-finding, multiple-dose efficacy, ocular pharmacokinetic, and hemodynamic studies were performed in normotensive rabbits. Steroid-induced ocular hypertension model in rabbits was used to study efficacy in glaucomatous pathophysiology. The test (0.35% OD suspension) and reference (0.15% three times a day [TID] solution) were compared. Results: The intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction was sustained for 0.35% and 0.5% strengths but not for other lower strengths tested or reference strengths. A 0.35% OD suspension reduced IOP >2 mmHg after 24 h of dosing, which was not seen with the reference. After multiple dosing, 0.35% OD suspension reduced IOP by 4–6 mmHg after 24 h, which was comparable to the 0.15% TID reference solution. An ocular pharmacokinetic study showed that the brimonidine was rapidly absorbed and distributed throughout the eye after topical administration. Concentration was higher in tissues with high α2 receptors, such as cornea–conjunctiva, iris/ciliary body, and choroid/retina. The steady-state concentrations in these organs were also significant after 24 h of the last dose. There was an indication of increased plasma levels, so a hemodynamic study was performed to assess any adverse effects. All hemodynamic parameters were normal and no new unusual safety findings were observed. Conclusions: The study demonstrated that the novel brimonidine 0.35% ophthalmic nanosuspension is both safe and effective when administered OD and is comparable to the marketed reference formulation administered TID. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brimonidine is a commonly used drug for glaucoma treatment, which has been linked to ocular autoimmune disorders like uveitis and conjunctivitis. Corneal pathology under brimonidine is generally less common. Here, we report a 78 -year-old male patient suffering from immune corneal stromal inflammation with hypotony and resulting hypotonic maculopathy after 6 weeks after introduction of brimonidine treatment. Systemic work-up for system autoimmune and infectious diseases was negative. We discontinued brimonidine and administered topical prednisolone under which inflammatory corneal signs and intraocular pressure normalized. Chorioretinal folds persisted after 9 months. Our case report suggests monitoring patients under brimonidine for sterile corneal infiltration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Brimonidine is a highly alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, which provides a potential myopia control effect. This study aimed to examine the pharmacokinetics and concentration of brimonidine in the posterior segment tissue of eyes in guinea pigs. Methods: A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was successfully used for brimonidine pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution research in guinea pigs following intravitreal administration (20 μg/eye). Results: Brimonidine concentrations in the retina and sclera were maintained at a high level (>60 ng/g) at 96 h postdosing. Brimonidine concentration peaked in the retina (377.86 ng/g) at 2.41 h and sclera (306.18 ng/g) at 6.98 h. The area under curve (AUC0–∞) was 27,179.99 ng h/g in the retina and 39,529.03 ng h/g in the sclera. The elimination half-life (T1/2e) was 62.43 h in the retina and 67.94 h in the sclera. Conclusions: The results indicated that brimonidine was rapidly absorbed and diffused to the retina and sclera. Meanwhile, it maintained higher posterior tissue concentrations, which can effectively activate the alpha-2 adrenergic receptor. This may provide pharmacokinetic evidence for the inhibition of myopia progression by brimonidine in animal experiments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This multicenter, randomized, comparative, and investigator-masked crossover clinical trial sought to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fixed combinations of 0.1% brimonidine/0.5% timolol (BTFC) versus 1% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol (DTFC) as adjunctive therapies to prostaglandin analogues. Methods: A total of 110 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension previously treated with prostaglandin analogue monotherapy were randomized to receive either BTFC or DTFC as adjunctive therapy for 8 weeks. These patients were then crossed over to the alternative treatment arm for another 8 weeks. The reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) (primary outcome), occurrence of adverse events, ocular discomfort after instillation, and patient preference (secondary outcomes) were recorded through patient interviews. Results: BTFC instillation for 8 weeks reduced IOP by 3.55 mmHg, demonstrating non-inferiority to DTFC instillation (3.60 mmHg; P < 0.0001, mixed-effects model). Although adverse events were rare with both combinations, patients reported greater discomfort with DTFC than with BTFC (P < 0.0001). More patients preferred BTFC (P < 0.0001) over DTFC, as BTFC caused minimal or no eye irritation. Conclusion: As BTFC offered better tolerability than DTFC with comparable reduction in IOP, we recommend it as an alternative for patients who experience ocular discomfort with DTFC-prostaglandin analogue combination therapy. Trial Registration Number: jRCTs051190125. Plain Language Summary: Patients with glaucoma who require further reduction in intraocular pressure while undergoing monotherapy with prostaglandin analogue ophthalmic solution have been prescribed two enhanced treatment options: 0.1% brimonidine/0.5% timolol fixed combination ophthalmic solution (BTFC) and 1% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed combination ophthalmic solution (DTFC). The Aibeta Crossover Study Group in Japan compared the efficacy and tolerability of fixed combinations of BTFC versus DTFC when an additional fixed combination ophthalmic solution was prescribed in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who had been treated with prostaglandin analogue monotherapy. We recruited 110 patients previously treated with prostaglandin analogue monotherapy at 20 clinical centers in Japan, then randomly assigned them to two alternative treatment groups: the BTFC to DTFC group or the DTFC to BTFC group, as an adjunctive therapy to prostaglandin analogues for total of 16 weeks. We compared the reduction in intraocular pressure, occurrence of side effects, eye discomfort after instillation, and patient preference between BTFC versus DTFC instillations. The intraocular pressure reduction of BTFC instillation was comparable to that of DTFC instillation, showing non-inferiority to DTFC (3.55 mmHg vs. 3.60 mmHg; P < 0.0001, mixed-effects model). Both eye drops caused few side effects; however, patients felt greater eye discomfort with DTFC than with BTFC (P < 0.0001). Because of less eye irritation, more patients preferred BTFC (P < 0.0001) over DTFC. We can recommend using BTFC for patients who feel eye discomfort with DTFC–prostaglandin analogue combination therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the concentrations of brimonidine and brinzolamide in the vitreous and aqueous humor after instillation of a 0.1% brimonidine tartrate and 1% brinzolamide fixed-combination ophthalmic suspension. Methods: The present investigation involved patients with macular holes or idiopathic epiretinal membranes who were planning to undergo vitrectomy. One week prior to surgery, the patients received twice-daily topical treatment with 0.1% brimonidine tartrate and 1% brinzolamide fixed-combination ophthalmic suspension. Before vitrectomy, vitreous and aqueous humor samples were collected, and the mean concentrations of brimonidine and brinzolamide were determined through liquid chromatography-tandem spectrometry. Results: Ten eyes (nine phakic and one pseudophakic eyes; 10 patients) were examined. The concentration of brimonidine in vitreous and aqueous humor samples was 5.02 ± 2.24 and 559 ± 670 nM, respectively. The concentration of brimonidine in the vitreous humor, which is needed to activate α2 receptors, was >2 nM in all patients. The concentration of brinzolamide was 8.96 ± 4.65 and 1100 ± 813 nM, respectively. However, there was no significant correlation between the concentrations of brimonidine in the vitreous and aqueous humor samples. Conclusions: Sufficient concentrations of brimonidine were detected in all vitreous samples. The dissociated correlation of the drug concentrations between aqueous and vitreous humors implies the possibility of another pathway to vitreous humor, different from the pathway to aqueous humor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brimonidine, a selective alpha-2 adrenergic agonist used for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma, has been shown to cause neurological side effects such as unresponsiveness, lethargy, hypoventilation, and stupor, mimicking opioid toxicity. We report one case of transient encephalopathy in a toddler, in whom accidental brimonidine toxicity was suspected and then confirmed by a toxicology study. The healthy 8-month-old girl was taken to the pediatric ER since she was drowsy and hypotonic with miosis. The computed tomography scan of her brain and toxicological workup of her blood and urine were negative. Starting from the fourth hour, the child progressively improved, and by the sixth hour, she recovered to a normal state of consciousness. A survey of available drugs within the child’s reach showed the presence of brimonidine. Thus, ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) was applied to quantify the brimonidine in urine and plasma samples, showing levels of 8.40 ng/mL and 0.79 ng/mL, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first report to determine brimonidine levels in urine and plasma using UPLC-MS/MS. Insufficient knowledge on the part of family members about the potential hazards of an apparently innocuous, topical medication such as eye drops may put children at a greater risk of poisoning. Necessary warnings should be given to parents with greater care when prescribing this medication.

Glaucoma is a chronic eye disease in which the pressure inside the eye increases and leads to damage to the optic nerve, and eventually causes blindness. In this disease, it is often necessary to use a multi-drug treatment system. There is a fixed combination of timolol maleate and brimonidine tartrate among the combination drugs in glaucoma treatment. Liposomes are one of the most important targeted drug delivery systems to eye tissue, which leads to improved drug permeability and durability in ocular tissue. In this study, thin layer hydration was used to make liposomal formulations containing timolol maleate (TM) and brimonidine tartrate (BT). After the necessary evaluations, one of the eight initial formulations was selected as an optimization formulation. Then, characteristics such as drug loading percentage, particle size, pH, zeta potential, and drug release were performed on the optimized formulation. The study of reducing intraocular pressure was performed on the optimized formulation. This study in total was performed on 18 rabbits in three groups. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) polymer was injected into the anterior chamber to experimental induce glaucoma. The selected formulation was within the acceptable range of ocular products in terms of physical properties. HPMC polymer injection successfully induced glaucoma in the animal model, resulting in a 79% increase in intraocular pressure. The results showed that the liposomal formulation significantly reduced the intraocular pressure compared to the simple formulation of the aqueous solution, and both formulations were able to significantly reduce the intraocular pressure compared to the control group (P < 0.001). The results also showed that liposomal formulation has a therapeutic effect in reducing intraocular pressure. It seems that the selected liposomal formulation made by thin layer hydration can act as a suitable drug carrier to increase the effectiveness of the fixed combination of timolol maleate and brimonidine tartrate and be proposed as a new drug formulation for targeted and controlled drug delivery in the treatment of glaucoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible vision loss worldwide, and reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only factor that can be interfered to delay disease progression. As the first line and preferred method to treat glaucoma, eye drops have many shortcomings, such as low bioavailability, poor patient compliance, and unsustainable therapeutic effect. In this study, a highly efficient brimonidine (BRI) silicone rubber implant (BRI@SR@TPU implant) has been designed, prepared, characterized, and administrated for sustained relief of IOP to treat glaucoma. The in vitro BRI release from BRI@SR@TPU implants shows a sustainable release profile for up to 35 d, with decreased burst release and increased immediate drug concentration. The carrier materials are not cytotoxic to human corneal epithelial cells and conjunctival epithelial cells, and show good biocompatibility, which can be safely administrated into rabbit’s conjunctival sac. The BRI@SR@TPU implant sustainably released BRI and effectively reduced IOP for 18 d (72 times) compared to the commercial BRI eye drops (6 h). The BRI@SR@TPU implant is thus a promising noninvasive platform product for long-term IOP-reducing in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Objectives:To investigate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy, safety, and treatment tolerability of brinzolamide/ brimonidine fixed combination (BBFC) in maximum medical therapy.Materials and Methods:The medical records of 92 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension who had previously been treated with a different antiglaucomatous regimen and were switched to a treatment regimen that included BBFC were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 4 groups including 22, 20, 27, and 23 patients based on previous glaucoma treatment. All patients received maximum medical treatment regimen by adding a combination of beta blocker-prostaglandin analogue therapy along with BBFC. IOP values at baseline and month 1, month 3 and month 6 after starting BBFC and ocular adverse effects at follow-up visits were evaluated.Results:The mean age of all patients was 62.7±16.6 years (range: 18-90). Fifty-two patients (56.5%) were women and 40 (43.5%) were men. Forty-eight (52.2%) patients had primary open-angle glaucoma, 35 (38.0%) had pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and 9 (9.8%) had ocular hypertension. The IOP of the all eyes was 21.1±4.8 mmHg (range: 17-25) before and 17.6±3.7 mmHg, 17.3±3.4, and 17.0±3.5 mmHg at month 1, 3, and 6 after the introduction of BBFC, respectively (p

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness, affecting 111 million people by 2040 worldwide. Intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only controllable risk factor for the disease and current treatment options seek to reduce IOP via daily taking eye drops. However, shortcomings of eye drops, such as poor bioavailability and unsatisfied therapeutic effects, may lead to inadequate patient compliance. In this study, an effective brimonidine (BRI)-loaded silicone rubber (SR) implant coated with polydimethylsiloxane (BRI@SR@PDMS) is designed and fully investigated for IOP reduction treatment. The in vitro BRI release from BRI@SR@PDMS implant reveals a more sustainable trend lasting over 1 month, with a gradually declined immediate drug concentration. The carrier materials show no cytotoxicity on human corneal epithelial cells and mice corneal epithelial cells in vitro. After administrated into rabbit's conjunctival sac, the BRI@SR@PDMS implant releases BRI in a sustained fashion and effectively reduces IOP for 18 days with great biosafety. In contrast, BRI eye drops only maintain IOP-lowering effect for 6 h. Therefore, as a substitute of eye drops, the BRI@SR@PDMS implant can be applied as a promising non-invasive platform to achieve long-term IOP-lowering in patients suffering from ocular hypertension or glaucoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]