Search

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by a diverse range of molecular features that have been extensively studied. MYC plays a critical role in regulating metabolism, differentiation, proliferation, cell growth, and apoptosis. Dysregulation of MYC is associated with poor prognosis and contributes to the development and progression of breast cancer. A particularly intriguing aspect of TNBC is its association with tumors in BRCA1 mutation carriers, especially in younger women. MYC may also contribute to resistance to adjuvant treatments. For TNBC, targeting MYC-regulated pathways in combination with inhibitors of other carcinogenic pathways offers a promising therapeutic approach. Several signaling pathways regulate TNBC, and targeting these pathways could lead to effective therapeutic strategies for breast cancer. Advances in genomic tools, such as CRISPR–Cas9, next-generation sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing, are revolutionizing breast cancer diagnoses. These technologies have significantly enhanced our understanding of MYC oncogenesis, particularly through CRISPR–Cas9 and NGS. Targeting MYC and its partner MAX could provide valuable insights into TNBC. Moreover, the therapeutic potential of targeting MYC-driven signaling mechanisms and their interactions with other oncogenic pathways, including PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Wnt/β-catenin, is increasingly recognized. Next-generation sequencing and CRISPR–Cas9 represent significant breakthroughs in genomic tools that open new opportunities to explore MYC's role in TNBC and facilitate the development of personalized treatment plans. This review discusses the future clinical applications of personalized treatment strategies for patients with TNBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is an early-stage cancerous lesion found in the fallopian tubes, often at the fimbrial end. It is strongly associated with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), a highly aggressive type of ovarian cancer. STIC is considered a precursor to many HGSC cases, originating in the fallopian tubes. Its development is frequently linked to mutations in the TP53 gene, leading to the formation of a p53 signature, an early abnormality that may progress to HGSC. This signature is more common in BRCA mutation carriers, explaining the higher incidence of STIC in this group. The aim of this review is to evaluate the literature on the incidence of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma in patients (both BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative) undergoing preventive salpingo-oophorectomy, analysing the available data and identifying associations between specific characteristics and the onset of STIC. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature from 2016 to 2023 was conducted using PubMed, focusing on studies analysing the incidence of STIC in BRCA-positive patients undergoing preventive salpingo-oophorectomy. Data on patient characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and incidence of STIC were extracted and analysed. Results: Nine international studies were included in the review, reporting varying incidences of STIC among patients undergoing salpingo-oophorectomy. The overall incidence of STIC in all the women included in the studies was 7.31%, while that in the BRCA-mutated women was approximately 6.08%. Notably, the presence of the TP53 signature was significantly associated with the occurrence of STIC. Conclusions: The etiopathogenesis of STIC involves complex interactions between genetic, environmental, and molecular factors. Further research is needed to fully understand its mechanisms and identify additional risk factors beyond BRCA mutations. Establishing a national database of STIC cases could facilitate future research and improve patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Individuals with germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants (BRCA carriers) are at high risk of developing high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC). HGSC is predominantly driven by TP53 mutations, but mutations in this gene are also commonly found in non-cancerous tissue as a feature of normal human aging. We hypothesized that HGSC predisposition in BRCA carriers may be related to increased TP53 somatic evolution, which could be detectable by ultra-deep sequencing of TP53 mutations in gynecological liquid biopsies. Duplex sequencing was used to identify TP53 mutations with high sensitivity in peritoneal washes and cervical liquid-based cytology (LBC) collected at surgery from 60 individuals including BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, and non-carriers. TP53 mutation pathogenicity was compared across groups and with TP53 cancer mutations. TP53 mutations were more abundant in cervical LBC than in peritoneal washes but increased with age in both sample types. In peritoneal washes, but not in cervical LBC, pathogenic TP53 mutation burden was increased in BRCA1 carriers compared to non-carriers, independently of age. Five individuals shared identical pathogenic TP53 mutations in peritoneal washes and cervical LBC, but not in blood. Ultra-deep sequencing of TP53 mutations in peritoneal washes collected at surgery reveals increased burden of pathogenic TP53 mutations in BRCA1 carriers. This excess of pathogenic TP53 mutations might be linked to the elevated risk of HGSC in these individuals. In some patients, concordant TP53 mutations were found in peritoneal washes and cervical LBCs, but the cell of origin remains unknown and deserves further investigation. • TP53 mutations are prevalent in cervical LBCs and peritoneal washes and their frequency increases with age. • Pathogenic TP53 mutation burden in peritoneal wash is associated with BRCA1 germline mutation, chemotherapy, BMI, and age. • Most mutations in cervical LBCs and peritoneal washes were not identified in blood DNA. • Identical mutations were identified in cervical LBCs and peritoneal washes of some patients, but cell of origin is unknown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite evidence indicating a decrease in ovarian reserve among BRCA patients, this factor seems to not impact their spontaneous fertility negatively.

Abstract Background A detailed understanding of the genetic basis of cancer is of great interest to public health monitoring programs. Although many studies have been conducted in Brazil, a global view on the molecular profile related to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) in this large and heterogeneous population is lacking. Methods A systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines was conducted in three electronic databases (PubMed, BIREME and SciELO). Brazilian studies covering molecular analysis of genes related to HBOC, published until December 2023, were considered. Results We identified 35 original studies that met all the inclusion criteria. A total of 137 distinct mutations were found in the BRCA1 gene, but four of them corresponded to 44.5% of all mutations found in this gene. The c.5266dupC BRCA1 mutation was responsible for 26.8% of all pathogenic mutations found in the BRCA1 gene in patients with clinical criteria for HBOC from the Brazilian population. Considering all studies that track this mutation in the BRCA1 gene, we found a frequency of 2% (120/6008) for this mutation in Brazilian patients. In the BRCA2 gene, the four most frequent mutations corresponded to 29.2% of pathogenic mutations. Even though it was tracked by few studies, the c.156_157insAlu mutation was responsible for 9.6% of all pathogenic mutations reported in the BRCA2 gene. Seventeen studies found pathogenic mutations in other non-BRCA genes, the c.1010G > A mutation in the TP53 gene being the most frequent one. Considering all studies that screened for this specific mutation in patients with the clinical criteria for HBOC, the frequency of c.1010G > A was estimated at 1.83% (61/3336). Conclusions Despite significant molecular heterogeneity among mutations in HBOC patients from Brazil, three mutations deserve to be highlighted, c.5266dupC, c.156_157insAlu and c.1010G > A in the BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 genes, respectively. With more than 200 records, these three mutations play a vital role in the pathology of breast and ovarian cancer in Brazil. The data collected shed light on the subject, but there is still not enough data from certain subpopulations.

Background: Halacha is the corpus of Jewish law which serves as a life blueprint for observant Jewish individuals. Health professionals counseling halachically observant populations at risk for breast cancer gene (BRCA) mutations should be well informed of the halachic approach to screening for BRCA mutations and subsequent interventions. Aim: To address the intersection of halacha with ethical norms and current medical evidence-based data as they relate to potential and identified BRCA mutation carriers at their various stages of decision-making. Results: Halacha, ethics, and medicine have much in common, but there are specific principles which guide halacha; decision-making in light of halacha is complex and varies with respect to the multi-faceted aspects of screening and intervention. Halacha encourages the exercise of autonomy regarding situations in which beneficence is not clear-cut and dependent on subjective perceptions. Conclusions: Health professionals knowledgeable of halacha are better equipped to counsel the observant Jewish population at risk of BRCA mutations or identified as mutation carriers, enabling them to present targeted questions to halachic authorities and thus achieve optimal decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A detailed understanding of the genetic basis of cancer is of great interest to public health monitoring programs. Although many studies have been conducted in Brazil, a global view on the molecular profile related to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) in this large and heterogeneous population is lacking. Methods: A systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines was conducted in three electronic databases (PubMed, BIREME and SciELO). Brazilian studies covering molecular analysis of genes related to HBOC, published until December 2023, were considered. Results: We identified 35 original studies that met all the inclusion criteria. A total of 137 distinct mutations were found in the BRCA1 gene, but four of them corresponded to 44.5% of all mutations found in this gene. The c.5266dupC BRCA1 mutation was responsible for 26.8% of all pathogenic mutations found in the BRCA1 gene in patients with clinical criteria for HBOC from the Brazilian population. Considering all studies that track this mutation in the BRCA1 gene, we found a frequency of 2% (120/6008) for this mutation in Brazilian patients. In the BRCA2 gene, the four most frequent mutations corresponded to 29.2% of pathogenic mutations. Even though it was tracked by few studies, the c.156_157insAlu mutation was responsible for 9.6% of all pathogenic mutations reported in the BRCA2 gene. Seventeen studies found pathogenic mutations in other non-BRCA genes, the c.1010G > A mutation in the TP53 gene being the most frequent one. Considering all studies that screened for this specific mutation in patients with the clinical criteria for HBOC, the frequency of c.1010G > A was estimated at 1.83% (61/3336). Conclusions: Despite significant molecular heterogeneity among mutations in HBOC patients from Brazil, three mutations deserve to be highlighted, c.5266dupC, c.156_157insAlu and c.1010G > A in the BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 genes, respectively. With more than 200 records, these three mutations play a vital role in the pathology of breast and ovarian cancer in Brazil. The data collected shed light on the subject, but there is still not enough data from certain subpopulations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The objective of this multicenter retrospective study aimed to evaluate the association of clinical variables and the incidence of ovarian cancer in patients with BRCA 1–2 mutation carriers who underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). Design: Patients with a pathogenic mutation of BRCA 1–2 genes and with no evidence of disease are considered eligible. The exclusion criterion was the refusal to undergo the surgery. The retrospective study included all RRSO performed from May 2015 to April 2022 in the three gynecological Institutions of Southern Italy for were included in this retrospective study. Participants/Materials, Setting, Methods: Age, menarche age, BMI, menopause at time of RRSO, breast cancer first- and second-degree relatives, ovarian cancer first- and second-degree relatives, estroprogestin use, pregnancy normal full-term delivery, history of endometriosis, previous breast cancer and histologic type, previous abdominal/pelvic surgery, BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 status, preoperative serum CA-125 levels (IU/mL), age at time of RRSO and histological analysis were collected. Results: 184 were recruited. One was excluded. To assess cancer risk, the outcome variable was classified into three classes: no event, cancer, and other conditions excluding cancer. 14 women presented ovarian cancer and tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) on histopathologic final report. Ovarian cancer was found in 8 patients, whereas the presence of STIC was found in 6 of them. Limitations: The low incidence of patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer or STIC compared with the total number of patients undergoing RRSO is a potential bias. Conclusions: Our study did not demonstrate a correlation between clinical features and the occurrence of precancerous or cancerous lesions in BRCA mutation carrier patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Clinical trials are currently exploring combinations of PARP inhibitors and immunotherapies for the treatment of ovarian cancer, but their effects on the ovarian tumour microenvironment (TME) remain unclear. Here, we investigate how olaparib, PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies, and their combination can influence TME composition and survival of tumour-bearing mice. We further explored how BRCA deficiencies can influence the response to therapy. Olaparib and combination therapies similarly improved the median survival of Brca1- and Brca2-deficient tumour-bearing mice. Anti-PD-L1 monotherapy improved the survival of mice with Brca1-null tumours, but not Brca2-null tumours. A detailed analysis of the TME revealed that olaparib monotherapy resulted in a large number of immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory effects in the more inflamed Brca1-deficient TME but not Brca2-deficient tumours. Anti-PD-L1 treatment was mostly immunosuppressive, resulting in a systemic reduction of cytokines and a compensatory increase in PD-L1 expression. The results of the combination therapy generally resembled the effects of one or both of the monotherapies, along with unique changes observed in certain immune populations. In-silico analysis of RNA-seq data also revealed numerous differences between Brca-deficient tumour models, such as the expression of genes involved in inflammation, angiogenesis and PD-L1 expression. In summary, these findings shed light on the influence of novel therapeutics and BRCA mutations on the ovarian TME.

Breast cancer (BC) ranks first in cancer incidence among women. For successful treatment of BC, depending on the molecular type and stage of the disease, chemotherapy is used, the side effects of which are manifested by menopausal symptoms, sexual dysfunction, and depressive states. However, not all patients after BC receive appropriate therapy for menopausal symptoms, what significantly worsens their quality of life. One of the symptoms that brings the most severe discomfort is the vasomotor symptom, a form of temperature dysfunction with peripheral vasodilation and increased cutaneous blood flow that results in increased heat loss. There are several types of drugs that are used to prevent menopausal symptoms in patients taking endocrine chemotherapy, many of which are in the experimental phase of development. In this review, we will try to identify proven effective and safe methods for correcting menopausal symptoms in women who underwent chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for BC.

Abstract Background Triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the neoplasia most associated with BRCA1 germline pathogenic variants (PV) and is more likely to develop metastases than the other breast cancer (BC) subtypes, mainly in the lungs and the central nervous system (CNS). Recently, BRCA2 carriers were shown to have a higher risk for developing CNS metastases. However, the patterns of recurrence and metastases of BRCA2 carriers with TNBC are unknown. Methods TNBC patient data attending the A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, from 1998 through 2020, were verified either by medical records or by BRCA1/2 genetic testing carried out. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to the data to assess the independent factors for bone and CNS metastases. Adjustment was done using all independent variables with p

To assess the role of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in SMARCA4 and further established ovarian cancer (OC) predisposition genes in early onset OC, we investigated a clinical cohort of 206 unrelated OC index patients with an age at diagnosis of OC ≤40 years using an extended panel of 24 (candidate) cancer predisposition genes. PVs in established OC predisposition genes were most frequent in patients with high grade serous OC (21/62, 33.9%), comparatively rare in patients with epithelial OC other than high grade serous (5/74, 6.8%) or borderline ovarian tumours (2/39, 5.1%) and absent in mucinous OC (0/27). We demonstrate that germline PVs in SMARCA4 unlikely predispose for early onset OC other than SCCOHT.

Clinical trials are currently exploring combinations of PARP inhibitors and immunotherapies for the treatment of ovarian cancer, but their effects on the ovarian tumour microenvironment (TME) remain unclear. Here, we investigate how olaparib, PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies, and their combination can influence TME composition and survival of tumour-bearing mice. We further explored how BRCA deficiencies can influence the response to therapy. Olaparib and combination therapies similarly improved the median survival of Brca1- and Brca2-deficient tumour-bearing mice. Anti-PD-L1 monotherapy improved the survival of mice with Brca1-null tumours, but not Brca2-null tumours. A detailed analysis of the TME revealed that olaparib monotherapy resulted in a large number of immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory effects in the more inflamed Brca1-deficient TME but not Brca2-deficient tumours. Anti-PD-L1 treatment was mostly immunosuppressive, resulting in a systemic reduction of cytokines and a compensatory increase in PD-L1 expression. The results of the combination therapy generally resembled the effects of one or both of the monotherapies, along with unique changes observed in certain immune populations. In-silico analysis of RNA-seq data also revealed numerous differences between Brca-deficient tumour models, such as the expression of genes involved in inflammation, angiogenesis and PD-L1 expression. In summary, these findings shed light on the influence of novel therapeutics and BRCA mutations on the ovarian TME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To investigate the clinical and pathohistological tumor characteristics, treatment, and treatment outcomes in patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer who were diagnosed, treated, and monitored at the University Hospital of Split from October 1999 to April 2021. Methods: The data were collected retrospectively from the medical history of 15 patients. They included the patient’s age at diagnosis, family history of malignancies, histological subtype, grade, breast cancer immunophenotype, stage of disease, status and types of BRCA mutations, type of surgical and oncological treatment, the specifics of metachronous bilateral breast cancers, the specifics of synchronous breast and ovarian cancers, and the outcome of treatment through overall survival (OS). Results: The median age of patients at the time of diagnosis of breast cancer was 53 years, and for ovarian cancer it was 56 years. A positive family history was confirmed in 13 patients (87%). All ovarian cancer patients had a high-grade serous histologic type, most often diagnosed in FIGO stages III and IV. Breast cancers were most commonly diagnosed in stages IA and IIA, with equally represented triple-negative and luminal immunophenotypes. The most common mutation was BRCA1 c.5266dup. The median OS of our patients was not reached. Conclusion: The clinical features of patients, pathohistological characteristics of tumors, and treatment outcomes in our study population are comparable with reports in the literature, respecting the specifics of different nations and races.

Background: Triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the neoplasia most associated with BRCA1 germline pathogenic variants (PV) and is more likely to develop metastases than the other breast cancer (BC) subtypes, mainly in the lungs and the central nervous system (CNS). Recently, BRCA2 carriers were shown to have a higher risk for developing CNS metastases. However, the patterns of recurrence and metastases of BRCA2 carriers with TNBC are unknown. Methods: TNBC patient data attending the A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, from 1998 through 2020, were verified either by medical records or by BRCA1/2 genetic testing carried out. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to the data to assess the independent factors for bone and CNS metastases. Adjustment was done using all independent variables with p < 0.2 in the univariable Cox model to describe the relationship between the independent variables until time of death. Results: A total of 388 TNBC patients were evaluated. We identified PV in BRCA1/2 genes in 21% (82/388), being 17.7% (69/388) in BRCA1 and only 3.3% (13/388) in BRCA2. A total of 120 patients (31%) developed distant metastases. Bone or CNS metastases were observed in 40% and 60% of BRCA2 PV carriers (p = 0.155), respectively. The BRCA2 carriers tended to have a higher likelihood of developing bone metastases (OR, 4.06; 95% CI, 0.82–20.01; p = 0.085), when compared to BRCA1 carriers (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.12–2.87; p = 0.528). BRCA2 carriers had an OR of 1.75 (95% CI, 0.33–9.14; p = 0.503) for CNS metastasis development, while BRCA1 carriers had an OR of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.23–2.23; p = 0.574). Conclusions: Patients with TNBC and PV in the BRCA2 gene had higher frequencies of secondary bone involvement and CNS in the course of the disease. However, the BRCA2 PV did not represent an independent outcome predictor of metastases and overall survival. Efforts to increase the number of BRCA2 carriers among TNBC patients are crucial for determining their risk of developing bone and CNS metastases compared to BRCA2 noncarriers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To assess the role of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in SMARCA4 and further established ovarian cancer (OC) predisposition genes in early onset OC, we investigated a clinical cohort of 206 unrelated OC index patients with an age at diagnosis of OC ≤40 years using an extended panel of 24 (candidate) cancer predisposition genes. PVs in established OC predisposition genes were most frequent in patients with high grade serous OC (21/62, 33.9%), comparatively rare in patients with epithelial OC other than high grade serous (5/74, 6.8%) or borderline ovarian tumours (2/39, 5.1%) and absent in mucinous OC (0/27). We demonstrate that germline PVs in SMARCA4 unlikely predispose for early onset OC other than SCCOHT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Objective: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, and the incidence of the disease continues to increase. The issue of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) in women with BRCA mutations and breast cancer is highly topical. This study is based on the long-term experience of our workplace with the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in women. We use the possibilities of oncoplastic surgery, including IBR. Our effort involves learning about women's awareness of IBR with a mastectomy at the same time. (2) Methods: The method of quantitative research of women's awareness using a structured anonymous questionnaire was chosen. Out of the total number of 84 respondents who already underwent IBR, 36.9% were due to BRCA mutations, and 63.1% were due to breast cancer. (3) Results: All of the respondents learned about the possibility of IBR before treatment or during treatment planning. The information was first obtained mainly from an oncologist. Women obtained the most information regarding IBR from a plastic surgeon. Before the mastectomy, all of the respondents already knew what IBR meant, as well as about the payment of IBR by the health insurance company. All of the respondents would choose the IBR option again. A total of 94.0% of women cited preservation of body integrity as a reason for undergoing IBR, and 88.1% of women knew about the possibility of performing IBR with their own tissues. (4) Conclusions: There are few specialized centers with a team of experts in reconstructive breast surgery in the Czech Republic, especially those that perform IBR. Research has shown that all of the patients were well informed about IBR, but the vast majority only learned about IBR before the surgical procedure was planned. All of the women wished to maintain body integrity. Our study results in the recommendations for patients and for healthcare management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Hereditary genetic mutations are a significant risk factor for malignant transformation of cells and cancer development. Hereditary genetic mutations account for 15 to 25 % of all ovarian carcinomas. Purpose of the study: to summarize data on hereditary ovarian malignancies, namely: genetic defects, features of the clinical course, treatment options, and disease prevention. Material and methods. A systemic search was undertaken using PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library databases for publications from 1999 to 2021. Results. The review describes the main genetic defects and hereditary cancer syndromes predisposing to the development of hereditary malignant ovarian tumors. The features of the clinical course and response to drug therapy have been presented. This article summarizes clinical guidelines of the professional communities (National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), American Society Of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, and European Society For Medical Oncology (ESMO). These guidelines contain early detection strategies and approaches to prevent the development of cancers in mutation carriers. Conclusion. Detection of hereditary cancer syndromes is important for patients and their families. Recognizing hereditary predisposition to cancer is important to allow timely surveillance and preventative interventions for both patients and family members.

Objective:Published studies on male breast cancer (MBC) and BRCA mutations are scarce and usually include, a small number of patients. The clinicopathological characteristics of BRCA mutant and wild-type MBC patients were compared in more than forty patients in this study.Materials and Methods:A retrospective review of MBC patients’ clinical and histopathological data was conducted. To compare the patients’ characteristics, chi-square test and Fisher's Exact test were utilized. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to examine the survival analysis.Results:In total 43 cases were reviewed. The average duration of follow-up was 35.8 months. BRCA mutations were found in 11 (25.6%) of the patients. BRCA1 mutations were found in four patients (9.3%), BRCA2 mutations in six patients (14%), and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in one patient (2.3%). The median age at diagnosis was 58 years old, and there was no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.7). Tumor location (p = 0.3), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression (p = 0.5), estrogen receptor status (p = 0.05), progesterone receptor status (p = 0.6), tumor stage (p = 0.9), lymph node positivity (p = 0.5), tumor histology (p = 0.06), and recurrence status (p = 0.6) were similar between BRCA-wild type and -mutated patients. Overall survival averaged 115.6 months (range: 76.0–155.3), with no statistically significant differences between groups (p = 0.6).Conclusion:This study investigated clinical and pathological characteristics and prognoses of BRCA wild and mutant-type MBC and these were similar in all groups studied.

Ionizing radiation is frequently used to treat solid tumors, as it causes DNA damage and kill cancer cells. However, damaged DNA is repaired involving poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) causing resistance to radiation therapy. Thus, PARP-1 represents an important target in multiple cancer types, including prostate cancer. PARP is a nuclear enzyme essential for single-strand DNA breaks repair. Inhibiting PARP-1 is lethal in a wide range of cancer cells that lack the homologous recombination repair (HR) pathway. This article provides a concise and simplified overview of the development of PARP inhibitors in the laboratory and their clinical applications. We focused on the use of PARP inhibitors in various cancers, including prostate cancer. We also discussed some of the underlying principles and challenges that may affect the clinical efficacy of PARP inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) have emerged as a new class of therapeutic agents for breast cancer patients with breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutations. However, the efficacy and toxicity of PARPis have not been clearly established. This study comprehensively evaluated the efficacy and safety of PARPis in patients with BRCA-mutated breast cancer. Online databases were systematically searched, and six clinical trials were included. The primary endpoint of efficacy was progression-free survival (PFS), whereas the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). Additionally, we assessed the safety of PARPis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that PARPis can effectively improve the PFS and OS in patients compared with the control group. The pooled HR (PARPi vs control groups) was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.55 − 0.73) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.73 to −0.95) for PFS and OS, respectively. In safety, PARPis demonstrated controllable adverse reactions. There were no significant differences in overall AEs or grade ≥3 AEs between the PARP inhibitor and control arms. Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of PARPis in patients with BRCA-mutated breast cancer, and more specifically clarify the efficacy of PARPis alone or in combination with other chemotherapy drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Breast cancer risk is elevated in pathogenic germline BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers due to compromised DNA quality control. We hypothesized that if immunosurveillance promotes tumor suppression, then normal/benign breast lobules from BRCA carriers may demonstrate higher immune cell densities. Methods: We assessed immune cell composition in normal/benign breast lobules from age-matched women with progressively increased breast cancer risk, including (1) low risk: 19 women who donated normal breast tissue to the Komen Tissue Bank (KTB) at Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, (2) intermediate risk: 15 women with biopsy-identified benign breast disease (BBD), and (3) high risk: 19 prophylactic mastectomies from women with germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes. We performed immunohistochemical stains and analysis to quantitate immune cell densities from digital images in up to 10 representative lobules per sample. Median cell counts per mm2 were compared between groups using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Results: Normal/benign breast lobules from BRCA carriers had significantly higher densities of immune cells/mm2 compared to KTB normal donors (all p < 0.001): CD8 + 354.4 vs 150.9; CD4 + 116.3 vs 17.7; CD68 + 237.5 vs 57.8; and CD11c + (3.5% vs 0.4% pixels positive). BBD tissues differed from BRCA carriers only in CD8 + cells but had higher densities of CD4 + , CD11c + , and CD68 + immune cells compared to KTB donors. Conclusions: These preliminary analyses show that normal/benign breast lobules of BRCA mutation carriers contain increased immune cells compared with normal donor breast tissues, and BBD tissues appear overall more similar to BRCA carriers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Germline and tumor BRCA testing constitutes a valuable tool for clinical decision-making in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. Tissue testing is able to identify both germline (g) and somatic (s) BRCA variants, but tissue preservation methods and the widespread implementation of NGS represent pre-analytical and analytical challenges that need to be managed. This study was carried out on a multicenter prospective GEICO cohort of EOC patients with known gBRCA status in order to determine the inter-laboratory reproducibility of tissue sBRCA testing. The study consisted of two independent experimental approaches, a bilateral comparison between two reference laboratories (RLs) testing 82 formalin-paraffin-embedded (FFPE) EOC samples each, and a Ring Test Trial (RTT) with five participating clinical laboratories (CLs) evaluating the performance of tissue BRCA testing in a total of nine samples. Importantly, labs employed their own locally adopted next-generation sequencing (NGS) analytical approach. BRCA mutation frequency in the RL sub-study cohort was 23.17%: 12 (63.1%) germline and 6 (31.6%) somatic. Concordance between the two RLs with respect to BRCA status was 84.2% (gBRCA 100%). The RTT study distributed a total of nine samples (three commercial synthetic human FFPE references, three FFPE, and three OC DNA) among five CLs. The median concordance detection rate among them was 64.7% (range: 35.3–70.6%). Analytical discrepancies were mainly due to the minimum variant allele frequency thresholds, bioinformatic pipeline filters, and downstream variant interpretation, some of them with consequences of clinical relevance. Our study demonstrates a wide range of concordance in the identification and interpretation of BRCA sequencing data, highlighting the relevance of establishing standard criteria for detecting, interpreting, and reporting BRCA variants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and is one of the leading causes of cancer death. The incidence, pathological features, and clinical outcomes in breast cancer differ by geographical distribution and across racial and ethnic populations. Importantly, racial and ethnic diversity in breast cancer clinical trials is lacking, with both Blacks and Hispanics underrepresented. In this forum article, breast cancer researchers from across the globe discuss the factors contributing to racial and ethnic breast cancer disparities and highlight specific implications of precision oncology approaches for equitable provision of breast cancer care to improve outcomes and address disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have revolutionised the management of patients with high-grade serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer demonstrating significant improvements in progression-free survival. Whilst the greatest benefit is seen with BRCA1/2 mutant cancers, it is clear that the benefit extends beyond this group. This sensitivity is thought to be due to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), which is present in up to 50% of the high-grade serous cancers. Several different HRD assays exist, which fall into one of three main categories: homologous recombination repair (HRR)-related gene analysis, genomic "scars" and/or mutational signatures, and real-time HRD functional assessment. We review the emerging data on HRD as a predictive biomarker for PARP inhibitors and discuss the merits and disadvantages of different HRD assays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Published studies on male breast cancer (MBC) and BRCA mutations are scarce and usually include, a small number of patients. The clinicopathological characteristics of BRCA mutant and wild-type MBC patients were compared in more than forty patients in this study. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of MBC patients' clinical and histopathological data was conducted. To compare the patients' characteristics, chi-square test and Fisher's Exact test were utilized. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to examine the survival analysis. Results: In total 43 cases were reviewed. The average duration of follow-up was 35.8 months. BRCA mutations were found in 11 (25.6%) of the patients. BRCA1 mutations were found in four patients (9.3%), BRCA2 mutations in six patients (14%), and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in one patient (2.3%). The median age at diagnosis was 58 years old, and there was no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.7). Tumor location (p = 0.3), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression (p = 0.5), estrogen receptor status (p = 0.05), progesterone receptor status (p = 0.6), tumor stage (p = 0.9), lymph node positivity (p = 0.5), tumor histology (p = 0.06), and recurrence status (p = 0.6) were similar between BRCA-wild type and -mutated patients. Overall survival averaged 115.6 months (range: 76.0-155.3), with no statistically significant differences between groups (p = 0.6). Conclusion: This study investigated clinical and pathological characteristics and prognoses of BRCA wild and mutant-type MBC and these were similar in all groups studied. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The objective of the study is to evaluate the possible association between history of subfertility, fertility treatments, BRCA mutations and the risk of ovarian cancer. Methods: This Israeli National Case–Control study included 1269 consecutive ovarian cancer cases and 2111 individually matched healthy controls. All participants were interviewed and molecular analysis of BRCA mutations were performed to 896 cases. The main outcome measure was reported history of subfertility and exposure to fertility treatments. Results: The rate of reported subfertility was 15.1% and 14.3% in ovarian cancer cases and controls, respectively. However, subfertility was more prevalent in cases with borderline ovarian cancer (but not for invasive ovarian cancer cases) than controls. Multivariate conditional logistic regression revealed that the risk of borderline ovarian cancer was elevated in both women treated for subfertility and those that were not treated for subfertility, (OR = 1.74; 95% CI 0.9–3.36 and OR = 1.79; 95% CI 0.98–3.26, respectively). In non-carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations, fertility treatments were associated with a decreased risk of invasive ovarian cancer while a significant increased risk of borderline ovarian cancer was observed (OR = 2.92, 95%CI 1.67–5.10). Conclusions: Reported subfertility and exposure to fertility treatments were associated with borderline but not with invasive ovarian tumors. This association was more prominent in women who are non-carriers of a BRCA mutation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: BRCA1 and−2 are critical components of the homologous recombination pathway of DNA repair required to effectively repair DNA double strand breaks, leading to an increased cancer risk in patients with inherited BRCA mutations. An additional subset of cancers exhibit 'BRCAness', harboring repair defects stemming from mutations in non-BRCA DNA repair genes. Both BRCA-mutant cancers and cancers with a BRCAness phenotype are sensitive to PARP inhibitors, a class of cancer therapy drugs that inhibit the repair of DNA single strand breaks. To expand the use of PARP inhibitors to a larger group of patients, studies have focused on new combination strategies using agents that can induce BRCAness. This review focuses on the current status of drug-induced BRCAness in combination with PARP inhibitors to enhance cancer treatment. The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) family of proteins has been implicated in numerous cellular processes, including DNA repair, translation, transcription, telomere maintenance, and chromatin remodeling. Best characterized is PARP1, which plays a central role in the repair of single strand DNA damage, thus prompting the development of small molecule PARP inhibitors (PARPi) with the intent of potentiating the genotoxic effects of DNA damaging agents such as chemo- and radiotherapy. However, preclinical studies rapidly uncovered tumor-specific cytotoxicity of PARPi in a subset of cancers carrying mutations in the BReast CAncer 1 and 2 genes (BRCA1/2), which are defective in the homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair pathway, and several PARPi are now FDA-approved for single agent treatment in BRCA-mutated tumors. This phenomenon, termed synthetic lethality, has now been demonstrated in tumors harboring a number of repair gene mutations that produce a BRCA-like impairment of HR (also known as a 'BRCAness' phenotype). However, BRCA mutations or BRCAness is present in only a small subset of cancers, limiting PARPi therapeutic utility. Fortunately, it is now increasingly recognized that many small molecule agents, targeting a variety of molecular pathways, can induce therapeutic BRCAness as a downstream effect of activity. This review will discuss the potential for targeting a broad range of molecular pathways to therapeutically induce BRCAness and PARPi synthetic lethality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brain metastasis (BM) are uncommon among women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The frequency, risk factors and clinical repercussions of BM in these patients are not well described. We retrospectively evaluated EOC patients treated at our center from 2002 to 2020 and assessed their clinical parameters, risk for BM development and association with overall survival (OS). This cohort has a known high frequency of BRCA mutation carriers (BRCAm) due to women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent. Among 1035 EOC patients, 29 (2.8%) were diagnosed with BM. The prevalence of BRCA mutations was more common among women with BM (56.5% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.033). The BM rate in patients with BRCAm was higher than the BM rate in those with wildtype BRCA (BRCAw; 5.1% vs. 2.1%, OR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.2–5.4, p = 0.013). Median time from diagnosis to BM and from disease recurrence to BM was longer among patients with BRCAm. Median OS was not significantly different among patients with BM versus those without BM (59.4 vs. 73.4 months, p = 0.243). After BM diagnosis, median OS was not statistically significantly different between patients with BRCAm and those with BRCAw (20.6 vs. 12.3 months, p = 0.441). Treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and bevacizumab had no impact on subsequent development of BM. BM are rare among EOC patients. However, the risk is three-fold higher among patients with BRCAm. BM do not significantly alter OS among EOC patients. The higher rate of BM in patients with BRCAm may be related to longer OS in this subpopulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The non-inferiority of combined breast conservation surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy (breast conservation therapy or BCT) compared to mastectomy in sporadic breast cancer cases is well recognised. Uncertainty remains regarding optimal surgical practice in BRCA mutation carriers. Aims: To evaluate the oncological safety of combined BCT versus mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers following breast cancer diagnosis. Methods: A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Observational studies comparing BCS and mastectomy in BRCA carriers were identified. Dichotomous variables were pooled as odds ratios (OR) using the Mantel–Haenszel method. Log hazard ratios (lnHR) for locoregional recurrence (LRR), contralateral breast cancer, disease-free and overall survival and their standard errors were calculated from Kaplan-Meier or cox-regression analyses and pooled using the inverse variance method. Results: Twenty three studies of 3807 patients met inclusion criteria; 2200 (57.7%) were BRCA1 and 1212 (31.8%) were BRCA2 carriers. Median age at diagnosis was 41 years with 96 months follow up. BCS was performed on 2157 (56.7%) while 1408 (41.5%) underwent mastectomy. An increased risk of LRR was observed in patients treated with BCS (HR:4.54, 95% Confidence Interval: 2.77–7.42, P

The incidence and mortality rates of ovarian cancer are increasing globally. Ovarian cancer is diagnosed at an advanced stage in 80% of women. After standard, platinum-based, front-line chemotherapy, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents are successfully employed as maintenance strategies for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer patients. Landmark clinical studies, including SOLO-1, PAOLA-1, PRIMA, and VELIA, have provided crucial insights on optimizing first-line maintenance treatment using PARP inhibitors. A group of ovarian cancer experts, (primarily from upper middle & high income countries outside US, China, Japan & Europe) met in September 2019 to discuss new developments for the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer and its implications.Key implications of the evolving clinical data included: (1) olaparib or niraparib maintenance therapy appears to be the preferred choice for patients with BRCA1/2 mutations; hence, BRCA testing is beneficial in identifying these patients; (2) niraparib monotherapy and olaparib in combination with bevacizumab have demonstrated significant benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) in homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive patients; (3) bevacizumab, niraparib alone, or observation can be an alternative for HRD-negative patients; (4) further data is warranted to explore the role of PARP inhibitors in treating HRD-negative, ovarian cancer patients to confirm findings of the exploratory analysis of PRIMA; (5) PARP inhibitors may be beneficial for stage IV ovarian cancer patients with inoperable disease and patients with prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy; and (6) there is an urgent need to increase awareness in both clinicians and patients on BRCA and HRD testing for optimizing treatment decision-making and improving clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer patients. In clinical medicine, the limited availability of family history (FH) information and the complexity of FH criteria has hampered the implementation of BRCA testing. Moreover, many cancer patients with BRCA mutations are not tested because they do not meet the criteria for FH. Consequently, BRCA testing in many high income countries, including the US and Australia, is underused and used inappropriately, which has resulted in the loss of valuable opportunities for better cancer management and cancer prevention.

Simple Summary: Triple-negative breast cancer is a life-threatening disease, even when identified at early stages. Recent advances have allowed the improvement of life expectancy via a personalized approach with the addition of newer chemotherapies, immunotherapies, and targeted therapies, but at the cost of added side effects. It has become increasingly clear that not all patients need such aggressive treatment. Here, we provide an overview of emerging opportunities to use less toxic therapies in patients at lower risk of recurrence or with mutations that can be effectively targeted using novel approaches. We provide a comprehensive review of completed and ongoing clinical trials with information on how to best stratify these patients for treatments to obtain maximum benefit without unnecessary toxicities. Early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been traditionally treated with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. The current standard of care systemic treatment of early-stage II and III TNBC involves the use of anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and carboplatin-paclitaxel with pembrolizumab in the neoadjuvant setting followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab per KEYNOTE-522. It is increasingly clear that not all patients with early-stage TNBC need this intensive treatment, thus paving the way for exploring opportunities for regimen de-escalation in selected subgroups. For T1a tumors (≤5 mm), chemotherapy is not used, and for tumors 6–10 mm (T1b) in size with negative lymph nodes, retrospective studies have failed to show a significant benefit with chemotherapy. In low-risk patients, anthracycline-free chemotherapy may be as effective as conventional therapy, as shown in some studies where replacing anthracyclines with carboplatin has shown non-inferior results for pathological complete response (pCR), which may form the backbone of future combination therapies. Recent advances in our understanding of TNBC heterogeneity, mutations, and surrogate markers of response such as pCR have enabled the development of multiple treatment options in the (neo)adjuvant setting in order to de-escalate treatment. These de-escalation studies based on tumor mutational status, such as using Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in patients with BRCA mutations, and new immunotherapies such as PD1 blockade, have shown a promising impact on pCR. In addition, the investigational use of (bio)markers, such as high levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), low levels of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and complete remission on imaging, also look promising. In this review, we cover the current standard of care systemic treatment of early TNBC and review the opportunities for treatment de-escalation based on clinical risk factors, biomarkers, mutational status, and molecular subtype. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are two prominent genes that account for about 20–40% of inherited breast cancer. Mutations in these genes are often associated with clustering of especially early-onset cancers in the family. The spectrum of BRCA variants showed a significant difference between geographic regions and ethnicities. The frequency and spectrum of BRCA mutations in Iran, a country in southwest Asia, have not yet been thoroughly studied. Here, for the first time, all published and not published BRCA pathogenic variants are presented. Among 1040 high risk families (1258 cases) which were detected, 116 families were found to carry pathogenic variants in either BRCA1 or BRCA2. Altogether 89 distinct types of pathogenic variants have been detected in Iran, including 41 in BRCA1 and 48 in BRCA2. 16 out of 89 mutations had not been previously reported in Iran and are presented for the first time in this article, among which 4 mutations are novel worldwide. 20% of families had one of the seven most commonly observed mutations, including c.81-1G > C, c.66_67delAG, c.4609C>T, c.1568delT, c.1961delA, in BRCA1 and: c.3751_3752insA, c.8585dupT in BRCA2. Combining the data from published articles and our study which has not been published before, a comprehensive table is created as a reference for entire BRCA pathogenic variants and their frequencies in Iran. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Standard therapy for advanced ovarian cancer (OC) consists of radical debulking cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. An important risk factor for OC is genetic predisposition, with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations accounting for the majority of hereditary OC. Mutation in BRCA ultimately causes accumulation of genetic alterations because of the failure of cells to arrest and repair DNA damage or to undergo apoptosis, resulting in tumorigenesis. Poly (ADP‑ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have emerged as a promising approach for managing BRCA‑associated cancers, especially high‑grade OC and breast cancers. They lead to synthetic lethality in BRCA‑mutated cells by stalling the replication forks in homologous recombination‑deficient (HR) cells. Four PARP inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib) are currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for OC, breast, and pancreatic cancer indications and are being evaluated for other BRCA‑associated cancers. Despite their clinical efficacy, cancer cells generally develop resistance to them through several mechanisms. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing strategies to counter resistance and identify the basic mechanisms of DNA damage response. This review focuses on the mechanism of action of PARP inhibitors, understanding various causes of resistance, and building strategies to overcome PARP inhibitor resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Nearly 80% of advanced cancer patients are afflicted with cachexia, a debilitating syndrome characterized by extensive loss of muscle mass and function. Cachectic cancer patients have a reduced tolerance to antineoplastic therapies and often succumb to premature death from the wasting of respiratory and cardiac muscles. Since there are no available treatments for cachexia, it is imperative to understand the mechanisms that drive cachexia in order to devise effective strategies to treat it. Although 25% of metastatic breast cancer patients develop symptoms of muscle wasting, mechanistic studies of breast cancer cachexia have been hampered by a lack of experimental models. Using tumor cells deficient for BARD1, a subunit of the BRCA1/BARD1 tumor suppressor complex, we have developed a new orthotopic model of triple‐negative breast cancer that spontaneously metastasizes to the lung and leads to systemic muscle deterioration. We show that expression of the metal‐ion transporter, Zip14, is markedly upregulated in cachectic muscles from these mice and is associated with elevated intramuscular zinc and iron levels. Aberrant Zip14 expression and altered metal‐ion homeostasis could therefore represent an underlying mechanism of cachexia development in human patients with triple‐negative breast cancer. Our study provides a unique model for studying breast cancer cachexia and identifies a potential therapeutic target for its treatment.

In breast cancer, genetic profile and expression of immunohistochemical markers determine prognosis and treatment scheme. Triple-negative breast cancer is characterized by absence of hormone receptor expression and negative HER2 status, as well as high proliferative index. These features of the tumor tissue limit doctors» selection of antitumor drugs. Development of triple-negative variant of tumor tissue is associated with a mutation in the BRCA1/2 gene. Consequently, determination of BRCA1/2 mutations is a prognostic biomarker, and in triple-negative cancer presence of expression of immune checkpoint proteins, multiprotein receptors on the surface of immune cells and tumor tissue play an important role in prognosis and selection of treatment strategy. Additionally, some studies demonstrate existence of multiple prognostic markers which allow to divide patients with triple-negative breast cancer into subgroups facilitating prognosis and selection of treatment strategy.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies, characterized by late diagnosis, rapid progression, and limited treatment options. This literature review comprehensively examines the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnostic challenges, treatment modalities, and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. It highlights the global disparities in incidence and outcomes, exploring the influence of socioeconomic, environmental, and genetic factors on disease progression. In addition, this review discusses recent advancements in diagnostic tools and treatment strategies, identifying gaps in current research and clinical practices. The synthesis aims to inform future research directions and policy-making efforts to reduce the global burden of pancreatic cancer and improve patient outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Qadir et al.)

Poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have appeared as a revolutionary approach to treating advanced ovarian cancer, particularly in patients with breast cancer (BRCA) mutations and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). This narrative review explores PARP inhibitors' clinical efficiency, safety, and changing role in this context. PARP inhibitors, such as olaparib, niraparib, or rucaparib, provide considerable benefits regarding progression-free survival expansion and overall outcomes improvement in first-line maintenance and recurrent settings. The underlying mechanisms, patient selection criteria, and resistance patterns are discussed, alongside insights into combination therapies to overcome resistance and enhance therapeutic efficacy. Ongoing clinical trials and future potential for personalized therapy approaches using PARP inhibitors for advanced ovarian cancer are also highlighted. However, despite these drugs' phenomenal ability to revolutionize treatment protocols for such cancer types, several challenges remain: toxicity management, cost, and development of resistance will require more research to optimize their use or broaden patient populations who can benefit from them., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Dewani et al.)

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of olaparib after being funded by the Spanish National Health Service (SNHS) as first-line monotherapy maintenance treatment in patients with advanced high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) and BRCA mutations in Spain. A semi-Markov model with one-month cycles was adapted to the Spanish healthcare setting, using the perspective of the SNHS, and a time horizon of 50 years. Two scenarios were compared: receiving olaparib vs. no maintenance treatment. The model comprised four health states and included the clinical results of the SOLO1 study, along with the direct healthcare costs associated with the use of first-line and subsequent treatment resources (2020 €). A discount rate of 3% was applied for future cost and quality-of-life outcomes. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was also carried out and a cost-effectiveness threshold of €25,000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) was considered. The introduction of olaparib as a first-line maintenance treatment for advanced HGSOC patients with BRCA mutations implied a cost of €131,614.98 compared to €102,369.54 without olaparib (difference: €29,245.44), with an improvement of 2.00 QALYs (5.56 and 3.57, respectively). Therefore, olaparib is cost-effective for advanced HGSOC patients with BRCA mutations, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €14,653.2/QALY. The results from the PSA showed that 92.1% of the simulations fell below the €25,000/QALY threshold. The model showed that olaparib could improve the overall survival by 2 years, vs. no maintenance treatment. Olaparib as first-line maintenance treatment is cost-effective in advanced HGSOC patients with BRCA mutations in Spain. • Our results suggest that olaparib could delay disease progression and improve OS by 2 years vs. no maintenance treatment. • Treatment with olaparib resulted in a gain of 2.00 QALYs vs. no maintenance treatment, at an ICER of €14,653,2/QALY. • First-line maintenance with olaparib is cost-effective in advanced HGSOC patients with BRCA mutations in Spain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of poly-(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1 and 2 inhibitor veliparib and temozolomide in metastatic breast cancer patients with and without germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Methods: In this single-arm phase II trial, patients with metastatic breast cancer received veliparib 30 to 40 mg twice daily on days 1 to 7 with concurrent temozolomide 150 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 of a 28-day cycle. The primary cohort was unselected for BRCA mutation status, and an expansion cohort enrolled only BRCA1/2 carriers. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in each cohort. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and evaluation of safety and tolerability. Results: In the primary cohort of 41 unselected patients, which included 9 BRCA mutation carriers, the ORR was 10% and clinical benefit rate at 4 months (CBR) was 27%. In the expansion cohort of 21 BRCA1/2 carriers, the ORR was 14% and CBR was 43%. Among all 30 BRCA1/2 carriers, the ORR was 23% versus 0% among non-carriers. In the subset of BRCA1/2 carriers, the ORR was 32% among platinum-naïve patients versus 9% among platinum-exposed patients. The median PFS was 3.3 months among BRCA1/2 carriers compared to 1.8 months among non-carriers (HR: 0.48, p = 0.006). A longer median PFS of 6.2 months was observed among BRCA1/2 carriers who had no prior platinum therapy. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (32%) and neutropenia (21%) that generally improved with dose modifications. Conclusion: Veliparib and temozolomide demonstrated clinical activity in platinum-naïve BRCA-associated metastatic breast cancer with manageable toxicity at doses of veliparib well below the single-agent active dose. Although the study did not meet its primary endpoint in unselected nor BRCA-associated breast cancer, this regimen was further evaluated in the BROCADE 2 study. Trial registration: NCT01009788 (ClinicalTrials.gov), November 9, 2009 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PARP1 plays a pivotal role in DNA repair within the base excision pathway, making it a promising therapeutic target for cancers involving BRCA mutations. Current study is focused on the discovery of PARP inhibitors with enhanced selectivity for PARP1. Concurrent inhibition of PARP1 with PARP2 and PARP3 affects cellular functions, potentially causing DNA damage accumulation and disrupting immune responses. In step 1, a virtual library of 593 million compounds has been screened using a shape-based screening approach to narrow down the promising scaffolds. In step 2, hierarchical docking approach embedded in Schrödinger suite was employed to select compounds with good dock score, drug-likeness and MMGBSA score. Analysis supplemented with decomposition energy, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and hydrogen bond frequency analysis, pinpointed that active site residues; H862, G863, R878, M890, Y896 and F897 are crucial for specific binding of ZINC001258189808 and ZINC000092332196 with PARP1 as compared to PARP2 and PARP3. The binding of ZINC000656130962, ZINC000762230673, ZINC001332491123, and ZINC000579446675 also revealed interaction involving two additional active site residues of PARP1, namely N767 and E988. Weaker or no interaction was observed for these residues with PARP2 and PARP3. This approach advances our understanding of PARP-1 specific inhibitors and their mechanisms of action, facilitating the development of targeted therapeutics. [Display omitted] • Study addresses off-target effects with selective PARP1 inhibitors while preserving PARP2/3 functions. • This study proposed PARP1 selective compounds for the treatment of breast and ovarian cancer. • Evaluation: assessing lead compounds' PARP class 1 selectivity via binding affinity, decomposition energy, hydrogen bonds and ADMET screening. • Significant differences were noticed in terms of binding of lead compound in PARP1 catalytic domain. • The structural insights lay a promising foundation for developing selective PARP1 inhibitors with minimal off-target effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of gynecologic cancer death in the world, and its prevention and early diagnosis remain the key to its treatment, especially for high‐grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Accumulating epidemiological and molecular evidence has shown that HGSC originates from fallopian tube secretory cells through serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma. Comprehensive molecular analyses and mouse studies have uncovered the key driver events for serous carcinogenesis, providing novel molecular targets. Risk‐reducing bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy (RRSO) has been proposed to reduce the subsequent occurrence of serous carcinoma in high‐risk patients with BRCA mutations. However, there is no management strategy for isolated precursors detected at RRSO, and the role of subsequent surgery or chemotherapy in preventing serous carcinoma remains unclear. Surgical menopause due to RRSO provides a variety of problems related to patients’ quality of life, and the risks and benefits of hormone replacement are under investigation, especially for women without a previous history of breast cancer. An additional surgical option, salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy, has been proposed to prevent surgical menopause. The number of opportunistic salpingectomies at the time of surgery for benign disease to prevent the future occurrence of HGSC has increased worldwide. Thus, the changing concept of the origin of serous carcinoma has provided us a great opportunity to develop novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

ObjectiveTo determine whether BRCA carriers have a decreased ovarian reserve compared with women without BRCA mutations, because BRCA mutations may lead to accelerated oocyte apoptosis due to accumulation of damaged DNA.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingAcademic tertiary care center.Patient(s)A total of 143 women, aged 18-45 years, who underwent clinical genetic testing for BRCA deleterious mutations because of a family history of cancer, were included. The cohort was classified into three groups: BRCA1 carriers, BRCA2 carriers, and women without BRCA mutations (controls). None had a personal history of breast or ovarian cancer.Intervention(s)None.Main outcome measure(s)The main outcome was serum antimüllerian hormone (AMH) level. Linear and logistic regression models adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI) were performed to determine the association between BRCA mutations and AMH.Result(s)BRCA1 mutation carriers had a significant decrease in AMH levels compared with controls after adjusting for age and BMI (0.53 ng/mL [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.77 ng/mL] vs. 1.05 ng/mL [95% CI 0.76-1.40 ng/mL]). Logistic regression confirmed that BRCA1 carriers had a fourfold greater odds of having AMH