Search

Background and Objectives: As brain lesions present complex diagnostic challenges, accurate tissue sampling via biopsy is critical for effective treatment planning. Traditional frame-based stereotactic biopsy has been complemented by navigated biopsy techniques, leveraging advancements in imaging and navigation technology. This study aims to compare the navigated and frame-based stereotactic biopsy methods in a clinical setting, evaluating their efficacy, safety, and diagnostic outcomes to determine the optimal approach for precise brain lesion targeting. Materials and Methods: retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent brain biopsies between January 2017 and August 2023 at an academic medical center. Data on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, biopsy technique (navigated vs. frame-based), and outcomes including accuracy, complications, and hospital stay duration were analyzed. Results: The cohort comprised 112 patients, with no significant age or gender differences between groups. Symptoms leading to biopsy were predominantly diminished muscle strength (42.0%), cognitive issues (28.6%), and aphasia (24.1%). Tumors were most common in the deep hemisphere (24.1%). The median hospital stay was 5 days, with a rehospitalization rate of 27.7%. Complications occurred in 4.47% of patients, showing no significant difference between biopsy methods. However, navigated biopsies resulted in fewer samples (p < 0.001) but with comparable diagnostic accuracy as frame-based biopsies. Conclusions: Navigated and frame-based stereotactic biopsies are both effective and safe, with comparable accuracy and complication rates. The choice of technique should consider lesion specifics, surgeon preference, and technological availability. The findings highlight the importance of advanced neurosurgical techniques in enhancing patient care and outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: As brain lesions present complex diagnostic challenges, accurate tissue sampling via biopsy is critical for effective treatment planning. Traditional frame-based stereotactic biopsy has been complemented by navigated biopsy techniques, leveraging advancements in imaging and navigation technology. This study aims to compare the navigated and frame-based stereotactic biopsy methods in a clinical setting, evaluating their efficacy, safety, and diagnostic outcomes to determine the optimal approach for precise brain lesion targeting. Materials and Methods: retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent brain biopsies between January 2017 and August 2023 at an academic medical center. Data on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, biopsy technique (navigated vs. frame-based), and outcomes including accuracy, complications, and hospital stay duration were analyzed. Results: The cohort comprised 112 patients, with no significant age or gender differences between groups. Symptoms leading to biopsy were predominantly diminished muscle strength (42.0%), cognitive issues (28.6%), and aphasia (24.1%). Tumors were most common in the deep hemisphere (24.1%). The median hospital stay was 5 days, with a rehospitalization rate of 27.7%. Complications occurred in 4.47% of patients, showing no significant difference between biopsy methods. However, navigated biopsies resulted in fewer samples (p < 0.001) but with comparable diagnostic accuracy as frame-based biopsies. Conclusions: Navigated and frame-based stereotactic biopsies are both effective and safe, with comparable accuracy and complication rates. The choice of technique should consider lesion specifics, surgeon preference, and technological availability. The findings highlight the importance of advanced neurosurgical techniques in enhancing patient care and outcomes.

Brain tumor biopsies are essential for pathologic diagnosis. However, hemorrhagic complications after biopsies may occur, leading to suboptimal outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the associated factors of hemorrhagic complications after brain tumor biopsies and propose countermeasures. We retrospectively collected data on 208 consecutive patients with brain tumors (malignant lymphoma or glioma) who underwent a biopsy from 2011–2020. We evaluated factors and microbleeds (MBs) in the tumor plus relative cerebral/tumoral blood flow (rCBF) at the biopsy site on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Postoperative all and symptomatic hemorrhage occurred in 21.6% and 9.6% of patients. In univariate analysis, a needle biopsy was significantly associated with the risk of all and symptomatic hemorrhages compared to techniques that allow adequate hemostatic manipulation (i.e., open and endoscopic biopsies). Multivariate analyses revealed that a needle biopsy and gliomas of World Health Organization (WHO) grade III/IV were significantly associated with postoperative all and symptomatic hemorrhages. Multiple lesions were also an independent risk factor for symptomatic hemorrhages. On preoperative MRI, abundant MBs in the tumor and MBs at the biopsy sites, in addition to high rCBF, were significantly associated with postoperative all and symptomatic hemorrhages. We recommend the following measures to prevent hemorrhagic complications: consider biopsy techniques that allow adequate hemostatic manipulation preferentially; perform more careful hemostasis in cases of suspected gliomas of WHO grade III/IV, multiple lesions, and abundant MBs in the tumors; and, if there are multiple candidate biopsy sites, select areas with lower rCBF and no MBs as a biopsy target. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]