1. Arch Width and Arch Perimeter among Class I Normal Occlusion, Class II Division 1 and Class II Division 2 Malocclusions Using 3D Digital Model
- Author
-
Nora Aliu, Albena Reshitaj, and Almedin Berisha
- Subjects
dental arch ,arch perimeter ,arch width ,angle's malocclusions ,Medicine - Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the arch width and perimeter of the maxillary and mandibular arch in individuals with Class I normal occlusion, Class II Division 1 malocclusion (Class II/1), and Class II Division 2 malocclusion (Class II/2). Methods and Results: A total of 120 patients with a mean age of 14.5±1.1 years (range 13-16) were divided into three groups: Group 1 included 40 individuals with Class I normal occlusion, Group 2 included 40 patients with Class II/1, and Group 3 included 40 patients with Class II/2. The gender structure in all groups was the same. Measurements of intercanine width (ICW), interpremolar width (IPMW), intermolar width (IMW), and premolar width (PW) in the maxilla and mandible, and dental arch width (DAW) were performed using the Maestro 3D Studio program. All mean maxillary and mandibular widths were higher in males than in females. This study showed that the maxillary ICW in Class II/1 was narrower than the ICW in Class I in males (31.6 mm vs. 33.9 mm), showing statistically significant differences P=0.030). In females, the maxillary IPMW in Class II/1 and Claas II/2 was significantly narrower than in Class I. (37.6 mm and 37.5 mm vs. 39.2 mm) (P=0.001). The IPMW in Class II/1 and Class II/2 in males had smaller values (38.1mm and 38.8mm) than Class I occlusion (39.9 mm) but did not show statistically significant differences (P=0.085). The perimeter of the maxillary arch in Class II/1 was smaller than in Class I, but larger than in Class II/2 (71.7 mm, 75.0 mm, and 73.3 mm, respectively, in females (p=0.003) and 76.7 mm, 78.4 mm, and 75.6 mm, respectively, in males, while we did not obtain a statistically significant difference (P=0.395). Intercanine, interpremolar, premolar, and intermolar widths were larger in the maxilla than in the mandible. In the mandible, we obtained a statistically significant difference only in the IPMW of the female gender classes (32,6 mm for Class 1, 32.4 mm for Class II/1 and 31.5 mm for Class II/2, P=0.031). According to gender, we obtained a statistically significant difference only in the mandible ICW in Class I occlusion (24.9 mm in females and 26.0 mm in males, P=0.018). Conclusion: For each gender, the width and perimeter of the dental arch should be adjusted for each malocclusion.
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF