Search

Antidepressants remain the first-line treatment for depression. However, the factors influencing medication response are still unclear. Accumulating evidence implicates an association between alterations in gut microbiota and antidepressant response. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the role of the gut microbiota-brain axis in the treatment response of venlafaxine. After chronic social defeat stress and venlafaxine treatment, mice were divided into responders and non-responders groups. We compared the composition of gut microbiota using 16 S ribosomal RNA sequencing. Meanwhile, we quantified metabolomic alterations in serum and hippocampus, as well as hippocampal neurotransmitter levels using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. We found that the abundances of 29 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were significantly altered between the responders and non-responders groups. These ASVs belonged to 8 different families, particularly Muribaculaceae. Additionally, we identified 38 and 39 differential metabolites in serum and hippocampus between the responders and non-responders groups, respectively. Lipid, amino acid, and purine metabolisms were enriched in both serum and hippocampus. In hippocampus, the concentrations of tryptophan, phenylalanine, gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamic acid, and glutamine were increased, while the level of succinic acid was decreased in the responders group, compared with the non-responders group. Our findings suggest that the gut microbiota may play a role in the antidepressant effect of venlafaxine by modulating metabolic processes in the central and peripheral tissues. This provides a novel microbial and metabolic framework for understanding the impact of the gut microbiota-brain axis on antidepressant response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Psychomotor retardation (PMR) is a core feature of major depressive disorder (MDD), which is characterized by abnormalities in motor control and cognitive processes. PMR in MDD can predict a poor antidepressant response, suggesting that PMR may serve as a marker of the antidepressant response. However, the neuropathological relationship between treatment outcomes and PMR remains uncertain. Thus, this study examined electrophysiological biomarkers associated with poor antidepressant response in MDD. A total of 142 subjects were enrolled in this study, including 49 healthy controls (HCs) and 93 MDD patients. All participants performed a simple right-hand visuomotor task during magnetoencephalography (MEG) scanning. Patients who exhibited at least a 50 % reduction in disorder severity at the endpoint (>2 weeks) were considered to be responders. Motor-related beta desynchronization (MRBD) and inter- and intra-hemispheric functional connectivity were measured in the bilateral motor network. An increased MRBD and decreased inter- and intra-hemispheric functional connectivity in the motor network during movement were observed in non-responders, relative to responders and HCs. This dysregulation predicted the potential antidepressant response. Abnormal local activity and functional connectivity in the motor network indicate poor psychomotor function, which might cause insensitivity to antidepressant treatment. This could be regarded as a potential neural mechanism for the prediction of a patient's treatment response. • MDD patients with poor antidepressant response have increased MRBD. • MDD patients with poor antidepressant response have decreased inter- and intra-hemispheric functional connectivity in the motor network. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Depression, affecting 350 million globally, poses significant morbidity and mortality. The correlation between major depressive disorder (MDD) and obesity is noted, with studies indicating poorer treatment outcomes among obese individuals. Measuring weight and body mass index (BMI) could aid in predicting depression treatment outcomes, influencing drug efficacy due to their ease of measurement, amid the shared public health burden of MDD and obesity. Aims and Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study are to evaluate baseline BMI's impact on antidepressant response in newly diagnosed outpatient department (OPD) patients at a tertiary care center. Materials and Methods: This longitudinal observational study was conducted with OPD patients at a tertiary care center, aged 18-65 years with newly diagnosed MDD. Assessment tools included the Diagnostic Criteria for Research accompanying the ICD-10, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, and physical measurement devices. Sample size determination considered BMI groups: Normal to underweight (N1=120), overweight (N2=120), and obese (N3=70). The methodology involved patient history, examination, and follow-up assessments after 6 weeks, analyzing antidepressant response statistically. Results: Obese patients exhibited reduced treatment response rates compared to normal and overweight counterparts. Responders had lower mean BMI. Gender disparities in obesity prevalence were noted. Limitations: The study's limitations include a small sample size of 310 cases, single-center design, and potential selection bias in a tertiary care setting. Conclusion: The findings underscore the complex relationship between BMI, depression severity, and treatment response. Obese individuals demonstrated higher initial depression scores and poorer treatment response, echoing previous research. The study highlights the need for personalized treatment approaches that consider individual BMI levels to optimize depression management strategies effectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study endeavors to deepen our understanding of the subject matter by exploring, within a real-world sample, the impact of menopausal status on the antidepressant treatments response. The whole sample included a total of 447 patients, 156 male and 291 female, 110 pre-menopause and 181 post-menopause. In our sample post-menopause women showed a worse response to antidepressants than pre-menopause women (p = 0.006), and this difference seems to be unrelated to age or brain aging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent psychiatric disorder and a leading cause of disability worldwide. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a signaling protein responsible for promoting neuroplasticity, is highly expressed in the central nervous system but can also be found in the blood. Since impaired brain plasticity is considered a cornerstone in the pathophysiology of MDD, measurement of BDNF in blood has been proposed as a potential biomarker in MDD. The aim of our study is to systematically review the literature for the effects of antidepressant treatments on blood BDNF levels in MDD and the suitability of blood BDNF as a biomarker for depression severity and antidepressant response. We searched Pubmed® and Cochrane library up to March 2024 in a systematic manner using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). The search resulted in a total of 42 papers, of which 30 were included in this systematic review. Generally, we found that patients with untreated MDD have a lower blood BDNF level than healthy controls. Antidepressant treatments increase blood BDNF levels, and more evidently after pharmacological than non-pharmacological treatment. Neither baseline nor change in the blood BDNF level correlates with depression severity or treatment outcome, which undermines its use as a biomarker in MDD. Our review also highlights the importance of considering factors influencing the accuracy and reproducibility of BDNF measurements. We summarize considerations to help obtain more robust blood BDNF values and compile a list of recommendations to help streamline assessment of blood BDNF levels in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Depression, affecting 350 million globally, poses significant morbidity and mortality. The correlation between major depressive disorder (MDD) and obesity is noted, with studies indicating poorer treatment outcomes among obese individuals. Measuring weight and body mass index (BMI) could aid in predicting depression treatment outcomes, influencing drug efficacy due to their ease of measurement, amid the shared public health burden of MDD and obesity. Aims and Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study are to evaluate baseline BMI’s impact on antidepressant response in newly diagnosed outpatient department (OPD) patients at a tertiary care center. Materials and Methods: This longitudinal observational study was conducted with OPD patients at a tertiary care center, aged 18–65 years with newly diagnosed MDD. Assessment tools included the Diagnostic Criteria for Research accompanying the ICD-10, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, and physical measurement devices. Sample size determination considered BMI groups: Normal to underweight (N1=120), overweight (N2=120), and obese (N3=70). The methodology involved patient history, examination, and follow-up assessments after 6 weeks, analyzing antidepressant response statistically. Results: Obese patients exhibited reduced treatment response rates compared to normal and overweight counterparts. Responders had lower mean BMI. Gender disparities in obesity prevalence were noted. Limitations: The study’s limitations include a small sample size of 310 cases, single-center design, and potential selection bias in a tertiary care setting. Conclusion: The findings underscore the complex relationship between BMI, depression severity, and treatment response. Obese individuals demonstrated higher initial depression scores and poorer treatment response, echoing previous research. The study highlights the need for personalized treatment approaches that consider individual BMI levels to optimize depression management strategies effectively.

Mixed depression (MXD), defined as (hypo)manic symptoms occurring within major depressive episodes, is common in both bipolar and unipolar disorders, but its prognostic and treatment implications remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the relationship between hypomanic symptoms, treatment response and remission of suicidal thoughts. We analyzed 1243 adults with major depressive disorder (MDD), recruited for a naturalistic study on treatment-resistant depression. Data were gathered cross-sectionally and retrospectively through structured interviews and clinical rating scales including the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS); statistical analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate methods. Hypomanic symptoms were present in 651 patients (45 %), while 307 patients (25 %) responded to treatment. Both treatment responders (p < 0.0001) and those who achieved remission from suicide ideation (p = 0.0085) showed lower hypomanic (YMRS) scores. Multivariate analysis showed that hypomanic symptoms were negatively linked to treatment response (O.R. 0.71–0.87), while bipolar spectrum markers such as age at illness onset (O.R. 1.00–1.03) and MDD recurrence (O.R. 0.47–0.89) predicted remission from suicidal thoughts. Medications commonly used to treat bipolar disorder showed some benefits, with dopamine/serotonin antagonists improving suicide ideation (p < 0.0001) and mood stabilizers being associated with reduced hypomanic symptoms (p = 0.0003). The study lacked prospective clinical assessments and treatment randomization. Hypomanic symptoms are common in unipolar depression; their assessment is essential to identify challenging-to-treat cases and select the best pharmacological options. • Hypomanic symptoms are quite common in unipolar depression • Depression with hypomanic features is associated with treatment resistant depression • Depression with hypomanic features is associated with a reduced remission of suicidal thoughts • The concomitant use of mood stabilizers in depression with hypomanic features is only marginally useful [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The development of ketamine-like rapid antidepressants holds promise for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of depression, but the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Implicated in depression regulation, the neuropeptide pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) is investigated here to examine its role in mediating the rapid antidepressant response. Methods The onset of antidepressant response was assessed through depression-related behavioral paradigms. The signaling mechanism of PACAP in the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG) was evaluated by utilizing site-directed gene knockdown, pharmacological interventions, or optogenetic manipulations. Overall, 446 mice were used for behavioral and molecular signaling testing. Mice were divided into control or experimental groups randomly in each experiment, and the experimental manipulations included: chronic paroxetine treatments (4, 9, 14 d) or a single treatment of ketamine; social defeat or lipopolysaccharides-injection induced depression models; different doses of PACAP (0.4, 2, 4 ng/site; microinjected into the hippocampal DG); pharmacological intra-DG interventions (CALM and PACAP6-38); intra-DG viral-mediated PACAP RNAi; and opotogenetics using channelrhodopsins 2 (ChR2) or endoplasmic natronomonas halorhodopsine 3.0 (eNpHR3.0). Behavioral paradigms included novelty suppressed feeding test, tail suspension test, forced swimming test, and sucrose preference test. Western blotting, ELISA, or quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analysis were used to detect the expressions of proteins/peptides or genes in the hippocampus. Results Chronic administration of the slow-onset antidepressant paroxetine resulted in an increase in hippocampal PACAP expression, and intra-DG blockade of PACAP attenuated the onset of the antidepressant response. The levels of hippocampal PACAP expression were reduced in both two distinct depression animal models and intra-DG knockdown of PACAP induced depression-like behaviors. Conversely, a single infusion of PACAP into the DG region produced a rapid and sustained antidepressant response in both normal and chronically stressed mice. Optogenetic intra-DG excitation of PACAP-expressing neurons instantly elicited antidepressant responses, while optogenetic inhibition induced depression-like behaviors. The longer optogenetic excitation/inhibition elicited the more sustained antidepressant/depression-like responses. Intra-DG PACAP infusion immediately facilitated the signaling for rapid antidepressant response by inhibiting calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII)-eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2) and activating the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Pre-activation of CaMKII signaling within the DG blunted PACAP-induced rapid antidepressant response as well as eEF2-mTOR-brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling. Finally, acute ketamine treatment upregulated hippocampal PACAP expression, whereas intra-DG blockade of PACAP signaling attenuated ketamine’s rapid antidepressant response. Conclusions Activation of hippocampal PACAP signaling induces a rapid antidepressant response through the regulation of CaMKII inhibition-governed eEF2-mTOR-BDNF signaling.

Background: The development of ketamine-like rapid antidepressants holds promise for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of depression, but the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Implicated in depression regulation, the neuropeptide pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) is investigated here to examine its role in mediating the rapid antidepressant response. Methods: The onset of antidepressant response was assessed through depression-related behavioral paradigms. The signaling mechanism of PACAP in the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG) was evaluated by utilizing site-directed gene knockdown, pharmacological interventions, or optogenetic manipulations. Overall, 446 mice were used for behavioral and molecular signaling testing. Mice were divided into control or experimental groups randomly in each experiment, and the experimental manipulations included: chronic paroxetine treatments (4, 9, 14 d) or a single treatment of ketamine; social defeat or lipopolysaccharides-injection induced depression models; different doses of PACAP (0.4, 2, 4 ng/site; microinjected into the hippocampal DG); pharmacological intra-DG interventions (CALM and PACAP6-38); intra-DG viral-mediated PACAP RNAi; and opotogenetics using channelrhodopsins 2 (ChR2) or endoplasmic natronomonas halorhodopsine 3.0 (eNpHR3.0). Behavioral paradigms included novelty suppressed feeding test, tail suspension test, forced swimming test, and sucrose preference test. Western blotting, ELISA, or quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analysis were used to detect the expressions of proteins/peptides or genes in the hippocampus. Results: Chronic administration of the slow-onset antidepressant paroxetine resulted in an increase in hippocampal PACAP expression, and intra-DG blockade of PACAP attenuated the onset of the antidepressant response. The levels of hippocampal PACAP expression were reduced in both two distinct depression animal models and intra-DG knockdown of PACAP induced depression-like behaviors. Conversely, a single infusion of PACAP into the DG region produced a rapid and sustained antidepressant response in both normal and chronically stressed mice. Optogenetic intra-DG excitation of PACAP-expressing neurons instantly elicited antidepressant responses, while optogenetic inhibition induced depression-like behaviors. The longer optogenetic excitation/inhibition elicited the more sustained antidepressant/depression-like responses. Intra-DG PACAP infusion immediately facilitated the signaling for rapid antidepressant response by inhibiting calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII)-eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2) and activating the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Pre-activation of CaMKII signaling within the DG blunted PACAP-induced rapid antidepressant response as well as eEF2-mTOR-brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling. Finally, acute ketamine treatment upregulated hippocampal PACAP expression, whereas intra-DG blockade of PACAP signaling attenuated ketamine's rapid antidepressant response. Conclusions: Activation of hippocampal PACAP signaling induces a rapid antidepressant response through the regulation of CaMKII inhibition-governed eEF2-mTOR-BDNF signaling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Extensive research has explored altered structural and functional networks in major depressive disorder (MDD). However, studies examining the relationships between structure and function yielded heterogeneous and inconclusive results. Recent work has suggested that the structure-function relationship is not uniform throughout the brain but varies across different levels of functional hierarchy. This study aims to investigate changes in structure-function couplings (SFC) and their relevance to antidepressant response in MDD from a functional hierarchical perspective. Methods We compared regional SFC between individuals with MDD (n = 258) and healthy controls (HC, n = 99) using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging. We also compared antidepressant non-responders (n = 55) and responders (n = 68, defined by a reduction in depressive severity of >50%). To evaluate variations in altered and response-associated SFC across the functional hierarchy, we ranked significantly different regions by their principal gradient values and assessed patterns of increase or decrease along the gradient axis. The principal gradient value, calculated from 219 healthy individuals in the Human Connectome Project, represents a region's position along the principal gradient axis. Results Compared to HC, MDD patients exhibited increased SFC in unimodal regions (lower principal gradient) and decreased SFC in transmodal regions (higher principal gradient) (p < 0.001). Responders primarily had higher SFC in unimodal regions and lower SFC in attentional networks (median principal gradient) (p < 0.001). Conclusions Our findings reveal opposing SFC alterations in low-level unimodal and high-level transmodal networks, underscoring spatial variability in MDD pathology. Moreover, hierarchy-specific antidepressant effects provide valuable insights into predicting treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Given the inconsistencies in current studies regarding the impact of FKBP5 gene polymorphisms on depression, arising from variations in study methods, subjects, and treatment strategies, this paper provides a comprehensive review of the relationship between FKBP5 gene polymorphisms and genetic susceptibility to depression, as well as their influence on response to antidepressant treatment. Methods Electronic databases were searched up to April 11, 2023, for all literature in English and Chinese on depression, FKBP5 gene polymorphisms, and antidepressant treatment. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed for key study characteristics. Qualitative methods were used to synthesize the study results. Results A total of 21 studies were included, with the majority exhibiting average to moderate quality. Six SNPs (rs3800373, rs1360780, rs9470080, rs4713916, rs9296158, rs9394309) were broadly implicated in susceptibility to depression, while rs1360780 and rs3800373 were linked to antidepressant treatment sensitivity. Additionally, rs1360780 was associated with adverse reactions to antidepressant drug treatment. However, these associations were largely unconfirmed in replication studies. Conclusions Depression is recognized as a polygenic genetic disorder, with multiple genes contributing, each exerting relatively small effects. Future studies should explore not only multiple gene interactions but also epigenetic changes. Presently, research on FKBP5 in affective disorders remains notably limited, highlighting the necessity for further investigations in this domain.

Objective: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is an important tool for treatment optimisation. Its usefulness has recently been demonstrated for some first-line antidepressants; however, few studies have been reported on the relationship between blood levels of mirtazapine and its antidepressant effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between blood concentration of mirtazapine and antidepressant response. Methods: 59 outpatients treated with mirtazapine for depression were recruited and followed up for three months in a naturalistic setting. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-21 (HAMD-21) was administered at baseline, month 1, and month 3 to assess antidepressant response. Mirtazapine serum concentration was measured at steady state. Linear regression analysis and nonlinear least-squares regression were used to estimate association between serum concentration of mirtazapine and antidepressant response. Results: Our results showed no overall association between serum concentration of mirtazapine and symptom improvement at month 1 and month 3. A marginally significantly higher serum concentration of mirtazapine was found in responders vs non-responders at month 3. Conclusions: The study suggests that serum concentration of mirtazapine is not strongly associated with the antidepressant efficacy of mirtazapine. This is probably attributed to its pharmacodynamic profile, even though higher blood levels seem to be marginally more effective. KEY POINTS: Mirtazapine plasma levels association with response is mild and do not follow the same curve of other antidepressants Mirtazapine higher plasma levels may show some benefit in a subgroup of patients Therapeutic drug monitoring may help during antidepressant treatment [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Given the inconsistencies in current studies regarding the impact of FKBP5 gene polymorphisms on depression, arising from variations in study methods, subjects, and treatment strategies, this paper provides a comprehensive review of the relationship between FKBP5 gene polymorphisms and genetic susceptibility to depression, as well as their influence on response to antidepressant treatment. Methods: Electronic databases were searched up to April 11, 2023, for all literature in English and Chinese on depression, FKBP5 gene polymorphisms, and antidepressant treatment. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed for key study characteristics. Qualitative methods were used to synthesize the study results. Results: A total of 21 studies were included, with the majority exhibiting average to moderate quality. Six SNPs (rs3800373, rs1360780, rs9470080, rs4713916, rs9296158, rs9394309) were broadly implicated in susceptibility to depression, while rs1360780 and rs3800373 were linked to antidepressant treatment sensitivity. Additionally, rs1360780 was associated with adverse reactions to antidepressant drug treatment. However, these associations were largely unconfirmed in replication studies. Conclusions: Depression is recognized as a polygenic genetic disorder, with multiple genes contributing, each exerting relatively small effects. Future studies should explore not only multiple gene interactions but also epigenetic changes. Presently, research on FKBP5 in affective disorders remains notably limited, highlighting the necessity for further investigations in this domain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• SC and FC each captures unique connectome features associated with antidepressant response. • The predictive FC stem from the default mode network, while predictive SC are mainly characterized by within-network SC of fronto-limbic networks. • Integrating structural and functional connectomes markedly improves prediction performances. Emerging studies have identified treatment-related connectome predictors in major depressive disorder (MDD). However, quantifying treatment-responsive patterns in structural connectivity (SC) and functional connectivity (FC) simultaneously remains underexplored. We aimed to evaluate whether spatial distributions of FC and SC associated treatment responses are shared or unique. Diffusion tensor imaging and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging were collected from 210 patients with MDD at baseline. We separately developed connectome-based prediction models (CPM) to predict reduction of depressive severity after 6-week monotherapy based on structural, functional, and combined connectomes, then validated them on the external dataset. We identified the predictive SC and FC from CPM with high occurrence frequencies during the cross-validation. Structural connectomes (r = 0.2857, p < 0.0001), functional connectomes (r = 0.2057, p = 0.0025), and their combined CPM (r = 0.4, p < 0.0001) can significantly predict a reduction of depressive severity. We didn't find shared connectivity between predictive FC and SC. Specifically, the most predictive FC stemmed from the default mode network, while predictive SC was mainly characterized by within-network SC of fronto-limbic networks. These distinct patterns suggest that SC and FC capture unique connectivity concerning the antidepressant response. Our findings provide comprehensive insights into the neurophysiology of antidepressants response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This pilot study was designed to investigate the antidepressant effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX), a selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The antidepressant effects of dexmedetomidine was compared with ECT, which is widely used in clinical practice for treatment of patients with TRD. Seventy six patients with TRD were randomly assigned to receive 10 sessions of DEX infusions or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) treatment. The primary outcome was the changes of depression severity determined by the improvement of 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24). The second outcomes were the rates of therapeutic response (reduction in HDRS-24 ≥ 50 %) and remission (HDRS-24 ≤ 10 and reduction in HDRS-24 ≥ 60 %) at posttreatment and after 3 months of follow-up visits. We found that 10 sessions of DEX infusions or ECT treatments significantly improved HDRS-24 scores at posttreatment and after 3 months of follow-up visits compared with the baseline. In addition, there was no significant difference between DEX infusions and ECT treatments regarding HDRS-24 at these evaluating points. Furthermore, the depression severity dropped to mild after 2 sessions of DEX infusion. In contrast, at least 6 sessions of ECT treatment were needed to achieve a same level. Finally, the rates of therapeutic response and remission were comparable between the two groups. No serious adverse events were observed. Based on current published evidence, we conclude that DEX exhibits rapid and durable antidepressant properties similar to ECT but with fewer side effects. • Ten sessions of DEX infusions or ECT treatments significantly improved HDRS-24 scores. • DEX infusion displays a fast onset of action in antidepressant and anxiolytic effects. • The rates of therapeutic response and remission are similar between the two groups. • The TRD patients receiving 10 sessions of DEX treatment are safety and well tolerable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several factors may affect response to treatment in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) including immune/inflammatory alterations and regional brain volumes, particularly in hippocampal regions which have shown to be influenced by inflammatory status. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an inflammatory marker found to be elevated in depressed women in large population studies. Here we investigate the effect of NLR on treatment response in MDD patients, and the role of sex and hippocampal volume on influencing this relationship. A sample of 124 MDD depressed inpatients (F = 80) underwent MRI acquisition, admission NLR was calculated by dividing absolute neutrophil by absolute lymphocyte counts and depression severity was assessed at admission and discharge via the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). As a measure of treatment response, delta HDRS was calculated. We found a significant moderation effect of sex on the relationship between NLR and Delta HDRS: a negative relation was found in females and a positive one in males. NLR was found to negatively affect hippocampal volumes in females. Both left and right hippocampal volume positively associated with Delta HDRS. Finally, left hippocampal volume mediated the effect of NLR on Delta HDRS in females. Sex moderated the relation between inflammation and treatment response in line with previous reports linking inflammation to hampered antidepressant effect in females. Further, this effect is partially mediated by hippocampal volume, suggesting that antidepressant response may be hampered by the detrimental effect of inflammation on the brain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Major depressive disorder (MDD) presents different clinical features in women and men, with women being more affected and responding differently to antidepressant treatment. Specific molecular mechanisms underlying these differences are not well studied and this narrative review aims at providing an overview of the neurobiological features underlying sex-differences in biological systems involved in MDD pathophysiology and response to antidepressant treatment, focusing on human studies. The majority of the reviewed studies were performed through candidate gene approaches, focusing on biological systems involved in MDD pathophysiology, including the stress response, inflammatory and immune, monoaminergic, neurotrophic, gamma-aminobutyric acid and glutamatergic, and oxytocin systems. The influence of the endocrine system and sex-specific hormone effects are also discussed. Genome, epigenome and transcriptome-wide approaches are less frequently performed and most of these studies do not focus on sex-specific alterations, revealing a paucity of omics studies directed to unravel sex-based differences in MDD. Few studies about sex-related differences in antidepressant treatment response have been conducted, mostly involving the inflammatory system, with less evidence on the monoaminergic system and sparse evidence in omics approaches. Our review covers the importance of accounting for sex-differences in research, optimizing patient stratification for a more precise diagnostic and individualized treatment for women and men. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• What is the primary question addressed by this study ? We sought to determine whether self-reported symptom phenotypes in late-life depression were associated with cognitive presentation, disability, and antidepressant treatment outcomes. • What is the main finding of this study? Apathy/anhedonia and fatigue/insomnia symptom phenotypes were associated with greater disability, while fatigue/insomnia and rumination/worry were associated respectively with processing speed performance and episodic memory performance. Severity of symptom phenotypes did not influence the response to escitalopram, however only worry and overall rumination severity improved specifically to escitalopram above placebo. • What is the meaning of the finding? Deeper characterization of depressive symptoms in older adults may provide information about cognitive performance and overall disability, however escitalopram, when compared to placebo does not appear to robustly improve most of these symptoms beyond worry and overall rumination. Late-life depression is associated with substantial heterogeneity in clinical presentation, disability, and response to antidepressant treatment. We examined whether self-report of severity of common symptoms, including anhedonia, apathy, rumination, worry, insomnia, and fatigue were associated with differences in presentation and response to treatment. We also examined whether these symptoms improved during treatment with escitalopram. Eighty-nine older adults completed baseline assessments, neuropsychological testing and providing self-reported symptom and disability scales. They then entered an 8-week, placebo-controlled randomized trial of escitalopram, and self-report scales were repeated at the trial's end. Raw symptom scale scores were combined into three standardized symptom phenotypes and models examined how symptom phenotype severity was associated with baseline measures and depression improvement over the trial. While rumination/worry appeared independent, severity of apathy/anhedonia and fatigue/insomnia were associated with one another and with greater self-reported disability. Greater fatigue/insomnia was also associated with slower processing speed, while rumination/worry was associated with poorer episodic memory. No symptom phenotype severity score predicted a poorer overall response to escitalopram. In secondary analyses, escitalopram did not improve most phenotypic symptoms more than placebo, aside for greater reductions in worry and total rumination severity. Deeper symptom phenotype characterization may highlight differences in the clinical presentation of late-life depression. However, when compared to placebo, escitalopram did not improve many of the symptoms assessed. Further work is needed to determine whether symptom phenotypes inform longer-term course of illness, and which treatments may best benefit specific symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used as treatment for depression, but its effects are heterogeneous. We investigated, in a subsample of the clinical trial Escitalopram versus Electrical Direct Current Therapy for Depression Study (ELECTTDCS), whether white matter areas associated with depression disorder were associated with tDCS response. Baseline diffusion tensor imaging data were analyzed from 49 patients (34 females, mean age 41.9) randomized to escitalopram 20 mg/day, tDCS (2 mA, 30 min, 22 sessions), or placebo. Antidepressant outcomes were assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS) after 10-week treatment. We used whole-brain tractography for extracting white matter measures for anterior corpus callosum, and bilaterally for cingulum bundle, striato-frontal, inferior occipito-frontal fasciculus and uncinate. For the rostral body, tDCS group showed higher MD associated with antidepressant effects (estimate = −5.13 ± 1.64, p = 0.002), and tDCS significantly differed from the placebo and the escitalopram group. The left striato-frontal tract showed higher FA associated with antidepressant effects (estimate = −2.14 ± 0.72, p = 0.003), and tDCS differed only from the placebo group. For the right uncinate, the tDCS group lower AD values were associated with higher HDRS decrease (estimate = −1.45 ± 0.67, p = 0.031). Abnormalities in white matter MDD-related areas are associated with tDCS antidepressant effects. Suggested better white matter microstructure of the left prefrontal cortex was associated with tDCS antidepressant effects. Future studies should investigate whether these findings are driven by electric field diffusion and density in these areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A key challenge in the understanding and treatment of depression is identifying cell types and molecular mechanisms that mediate behavioral responses to antidepressant drugs. Because treatment responses in clinical depression are heterogeneous, it is crucial to examine treatment responders and nonresponders in preclinical studies. Methods: We used the large variance in behavioral responses to long-term treatment with multiple classes of antidepressant drugs in different inbred mouse strains and classified the mice into responders and nonresponders based on their response in the forced swim test. Medial prefrontal cortex tissues were subjected to RNA sequencing to identify molecules that are consistently associated across antidepressant responders. We developed and used virus-mediated gene transfer to induce the gene of interest in specific cell types and performed forced swim, sucrose preference, social interaction, and open field tests to investigate antidepressant-like and anxiety-like behaviors. Results: Cartpt expression was consistently upregulated in responders to four types of antidepressants but not in nonresponders in different mice strains. Responder mice given a single dose of ketamine, a fast-acting non–monoamine-based antidepressant, exhibited high CART peptide expression. CART peptide overexpression in the GABAergic (gamma-aminobutyric acidergic) neurons of the anterior cingulate cortex led to antidepressant-like behavior and drove chronic stress resiliency independently of mouse genetic background. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that activation of CART peptide signaling in GABAergic neurons of the anterior cingulate cortex is a common molecular mechanism across antidepressant responders and that this pathway also drives stress resilience.

ObjectiveIn this secondary analysis of data from the Veterans Affairs Augmentation and Switching Treatments for Improving Depression Outcomes (VAST-D) study, the authors sought to determine the effectiveness of early improvement (or lack thereof) for predicting remission from depression with antidepressant therapy.MethodsThis study used data from the VAST-D study, a multisite, randomized, single-blind trial with parallel assignment to one of three medication interventions for 1,522 veterans whose major depressive disorder was unresponsive to at least one course of antidepressant treatment meeting minimal standards for dosage and duration. The authors calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of early improvement on remission, response, or greater than minimal improvement from depression for various degrees of improvement (10%-50%) on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (QIDS-C) at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks.ResultsThe end of week 2 of treatment was identified as the best time to evaluate early improvement. The presence of a ≥20% drop from the baseline QIDS-C score by the end of week 2 resulted in a PPV for remission of 38% and an NPV of 93% by week 12. Extending the observational window to week 6 minimally improved NPV (97%). This association did not differ across treatment groups.ConclusionsA lack of early improvement at the end of week 2 of antidepressant therapy can be used to inform clinical decisions on the likelihood of nonremission of depression during the subsequent 10 weeks, even when dosage optimization is incomplete.

Joachim Morrens,1 Maju Mathews,2 Vanina Popova,1 Stephane Borentain,2 Benoit Rive,3 Beatriz Gonzalez Martin Moro,4 Carol Jamieson,5 Qiaoyi Zhang2 1Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium; 2Janssen Global Services, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA; 3Janssen-Cilag, Paris, France; 4Janssen-Cilag, Madrid, Spain; 5Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Milpitas, CA, USACorrespondence: Qiaoyi Zhang, Janssen Global Services, LLC, 1125 Trenton-Harbourton Road, Titusville, NJ, 08560, USA, Tel +1 908 300 2500, Email qzhang87@its.jnj.comBackground: This post-hoc analysis evaluated the agreement between Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score- and Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score-based assessment of response in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treated with esketamine nasal spray plus a newly initiated oral antidepressant (ESK-NS + AD).Methods: Data were analyzed from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study (TRANSFORM-2) of flexibly dosed esketamine or placebo nasal spray plus a newly initiated oral-AD in adults with moderate-to-severe TRD. Patients with ≥ 50% reduction in MADRS from baseline at the end of the 4-week acute treatment phase were defined as responders. For the CGI-S-based assessment of response, patients with ≥ 2 points decrease from baseline or a CGI-S score of ≤ 3 (mildly depressed to normal) were considered responders. Cohen’s kappa coefficient was calculated to assess level of agreement between MADRS and CGI-S-based assessments.Results: At the end of 4-week treatment, the proportion of responders among all study patients (n=201) was similar when assessed using the MADRS (61%) and CGI-S (62%) methods, with substantial agreement (Cohen’s kappa=0.76; sensitivity=92%; specificity=84%) between both methods. When restricting analysis to ESK-NS + AD-treated patients (n=101) who had a higher response rate (on MADRS: 69%; on CGI-S: 68%), the agreement remained substantial (Cohen’s kappa=0.75; sensitivity=91%; specificity=84%).Conclusion: The CGI-S may be a practical and reliable alternative to the MADRS to assess response to ESK-NS + AD in patients with TRD and can be used in real-world practice to support informed treatment decisions.Keywords: antidepressant response, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity, esketamine, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, treatment-resistant depression

Background: Antidepressants are a first-line treatment for depression. However, only a third of individuals experience remission after the first treatment. Common genetic variation, in part, likely regulates antidepressant response, yet the success of previous genome-wide association studies has been limited by sample size. This study performs the largest genetic analysis of prospectively assessed antidepressant response in major depressive disorder to gain insight into the underlying biology and enable out-of-sample prediction. Methods: Genome-wide analysis of remission (nremit = 1852, nnonremit = 3299) and percentage improvement (n = 5218) was performed. Single nucleotide polymorphism–based heritability was estimated using genome-wide complex trait analysis. Genetic covariance with eight mental health phenotypes was estimated using polygenic scores/AVENGEME. Out-of-sample prediction of antidepressant response polygenic scores was assessed. Gene-level association analysis was performed using MAGMA and transcriptome-wide association study. Tissue, pathway, and drug binding enrichment were estimated using MAGMA. Results: Neither genome-wide association study identified genome-wide significant associations. Single nucleotide polymorphism–based heritability was significantly different from zero for remission (h2 = 0.132, SE = 0.056) but not for percentage improvement (h2 = −0.018, SE = 0.032). Better antidepressant response was negatively associated with genetic risk for schizophrenia and positively associated with genetic propensity for educational attainment. Leave-one-out validation of antidepressant response polygenic scores demonstrated significant evidence of out-of-sample prediction, though results varied in external cohorts. Gene-based analyses identified ETV4 and DHX8 as significantly associated with antidepressant response. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that antidepressant response is influenced by common genetic variation, has a genetic overlap schizophrenia and educational attainment, and provides a useful resource for future research. Larger sample sizes are required to attain the potential of genetics for understanding and predicting antidepressant response.

BackgroundHippocampal enlargements are commonly reported after electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). To clarify mechanisms, we examined if ECT-induced hippocampal volume change relates to dose (number of ECT sessions and electrode placement) and acts as a biomarker of clinical outcome.MethodsLongitudinal neuroimaging and clinical data from 10 independent sites participating in the Global ECT-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Collaboration (GEMRIC) were obtained for mega-analysis. Hippocampal volumes were extracted from structural magnetic resonance images, acquired before and after patients (n = 281) experiencing a major depressive episode completed an ECT treatment series using right unilateral and bilateral stimulation. Untreated nondepressed control subjects (n = 95) were scanned twice.ResultsThe linear component of hippocampal volume change was 0.28% (SE 0.08) per ECT session (p < .001). Volume change varied by electrode placement in the left hippocampus (bilateral, 3.3 ± 2.2%, d = 1.5; right unilateral, 1.6 ± 2.1%, d = 0.8; p < .0001) but not the right hippocampus (bilateral, 3.0 ± 1.7%, d = 1.8; right unilateral, 2.7 ± 2.0%, d = 1.4; p = .36). Volume change for electrode placement per ECT session varied similarly by hemisphere. Individuals with greater treatment-related volume increases had poorer outcomes (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale change -1.0 [SE 0.35], per 1% volume increase, p = .005), although the effects were not significant after controlling for ECT number (slope -0.69 [SE 0.38], p = .069).ConclusionsThe number of ECT sessions and electrode placement impacts the extent and laterality of hippocampal enlargement, but volume change is not positively associated with clinical outcome. The results suggest that the high efficacy of ECT is not explained by hippocampal enlargement, which alone might not serve as a viable biomarker for treatment outcome.

Introduction: A titration within a certain therapeutic reference range presupposes a relationship between the blood concentration and the therapeutic effect of a drug. However, this has not been systematically investigated for escitalopram. Furthermore, the recommended reference range disagrees with mean steady state concentrations (11-21 ng/ml) that are expected under the approved dose range (10-20 mg/day). This work systematically investigated the relationships between escitalopram dose, blood levels, clinical effects, and serotonin transporter occupancy. Methods: Following our previously published methodology, relevant articles were systematically searched and reviewed for escitalopram. Results: Of 1,032 articles screened, a total of 30 studies met the eligibility criteria. The included studies investigated escitalopram blood levels in relationship to clinical effects (9 studies) or moderating factors on escitalopram metabolism (12 studies) or serotonin transporter occupancy (9 studies). Overall, the evidence for an escitalopram concentration/effect relationship is low (level C). Conclusion: Based on our findings, we propose a target range of 20-40 ng/ml for antidepressant efficacy of escitalopram. In maintenance treatment, therapeutic response is expected, when titrating patients above the lower limit. The lower concentration threshold is strongly supported by findings from neuroimaging studies. The upper limit for escitalopram's reference range rather reflects a therapeutic maximum than a tolerability threshold, since the incidence of side effects in general is low. Concentrations above 40 ng/ml should not necessarily result in dose reductions in case of good clinical efficacy and tolerability. Dose-related escitalopram concentrations in different trials were more than twice the expected concentrations from guideline reports. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inflammation is a leading biological risk factor contributing to unfavorable outcomes of major depressive disorder (MDD). Both inflammation and depression are associated with similar alterations in brain structure, indicating that brain structural alterations could serve as a mediating factor in the adverse influence of inflammation on clinical outcomes in MDD. Nonetheless, longitudinal research has yet to confirm this hypothesis. Therefore, this study aimed at elucidating the relationships between peripheral inflammatory cytokines, gray matter volume (GMV) alterations, and antidepressant response in MDD. We studied 104 MDD patients treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and 85 healthy controls (HCs). Antidepressant response was assessed after 8-week antidepressant treatment by changes in 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) scores. The GMV alterations were investigated using a voxel-based morphometry analysis. Inflammatory cytokines were measured using flow cytometry. Partial correlations were used to explore the relationships between inflammatory cytokines, GMV alterations, and antidepressant response. Compared to HCs, MDD patients showed reduced GMVs primarily in the frontal-limbic area, right insula, and right superior temporal gyrus. Furthermore, the alterations in GMVs, particularly in the right middle frontal gyrus and the left anterior cingulate gyrus, were associated with ΔHAMD-17 and inflammatory cytokines. Additionally, GMV alterations in the right middle frontal gyrus mediated the negative relationship between interleukin -1β and ΔHAMD-17. This study contributes to understanding the effect of inflammation on the brain and their relationships with antidepressant response, offering a potential explanation for the connection between inflammatory status and treatment efficacy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors in our study declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Abstract Background Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common, chronic, debilitating mood disorder that causes serious functional impairment and significantly decreased quality of life. Pharmacotherapy represents the first-line treatment option; however, only approximately one third of patients respond to the first treatment because of the ineffectiveness or side effects of antidepressants. Precision medicine in psychiatry might offer clinicians the possibility to tailor treatment according to the best possible evidence of efficacy and tolerability for each subject. In this context, our study aims to carry out a clinical validation of a combinatorial pharmacogenomics (PGx) test in an Italian MDD patient cohort with advocacy license independence. Methods Our study is a prospective participant- and rater-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical observational trial enrolling 300 MDD patients who are referred to psychiatric services to receive a new antidepressant due to the failure of their current treatment and/or the onset of adverse effects. Eligible participants are randomized to the TGTG group (Treated with Genetic Test Guide) or TAU group (Treated as Usual). For all subjects, DNA is collected with a buccal brush. The primary outcome is the reduction in depressive symptomatology. The secondary outcomes involve a range of scales that assess MDD symptoms and social functioning outcomes. The assessment is performed at four timepoints: baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Discussion This project represents the first randomized controlled clinical trial to investigate whether a non-commercial PGx test improves outcomes in an MDD naturalistic cohort. Moreover, the identification of new genetic variants associated with non-response or side effects will improve the efficacy of the test, leading to further cost-saving. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04615234. Registered on November 4, 2020.

IntroductionA titration within a certain therapeutic reference range presupposes a relationship between the blood concentration and the therapeutic effect of a drug. However, this has not been systematically investigated for escitalopram. Furthermore, the recommended reference range disagrees with mean steady state concentrations (11–21 ng/ml) that are expected under the approved dose range (10–20 mg/day). This work systematically investigated the relationships between escitalopram dose, blood levels, clinical effects, and serotonin transporter occupancy.MethodsFollowing our previously published methodology, relevant articles were systematically searched and reviewed for escitalopram.ResultsOf 1,032 articles screened, a total of 30 studies met the eligibility criteria. The included studies investigated escitalopram blood levels in relationship to clinical effects (9 studies) or moderating factors on escitalopram metabolism (12 studies) or serotonin transporter occupancy (9 studies). Overall, the evidence for an escitalopram concentration/effect relationship is low (level C).ConclusionBased on our findings, we propose a target range of 20–40 ng/ml for antidepressant efficacy of escitalopram. In maintenance treatment, therapeutic response is expected, when titrating patients above the lower limit. The lower concentration threshold is strongly supported by findings from neuroimaging studies. The upper limit for escitalopram’s reference range rather reflects a therapeutic maximum than a tolerability threshold, since the incidence of side effects in general is low. Concentrations above 40 ng/ml should not necessarily result in dose reductions in case of good clinical efficacy and tolerability. Dose-related escitalopram concentrations in different trials were more than twice the expected concentrations from guideline reports.Systematic review registration[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=215873], identifier [CRD42020215873].

BackgroundDehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfated ester DHEA-sulfate (DHEA-S), (together DHEA[S]), are the most abundant adrenal steroids in humans and are found in blood and the brain, where they function as neurosteroids with direct receptor affinities. Preclinical studies suggest that DHEA(S) has antidepressant/neuroprotective properties, and exogenously administered DHEA has shown antidepressant efficacy in humans. Nonetheless, the role of endogenous DHEA(S) levels in major depressive disorder (MDD) and antidepressant outcomes remains unclear.MethodsMorning fasting serum DHEA(S) concentrations were determined in 36 healthy, unmedicated MDD adults with Hamilton Depression (HDRS) ratings ≥17, and 75 healthy controls. MDD participants then completed eight weeks of open-label SSRI treatment before DHEA(S) levels were re-sampled; those with post-treatment HDRS ratings ≤7 were classified as "Remitters." Pre- and post-treatment DHEA(S) levels of Remitters and Non-remitters were compared, controlling for age, sex, and BMI.ResultsPre-treatment HDRS ratings did not differ between Remitters and Non-remitters (p=0.179). Baseline DHEA levels of Remitters were significantly higher than both Non-remitters (p=0.008) and controls (p=0.004); baseline DHEA-S levels of Remitters were also higher than Non-remitters (p=0.040) but did not significantly differ from controls (p=0.096). Non-remitters did not significantly differ from controls. Post-treatment DHEA(S) levels remained higher in Remitters compared to Non-remitters (DHEA: p=0.013; DHEA-S: p=0.040).ConclusionsThese data suggest that higher circulating DHEA(S) levels (while unmedicated and after eight weeks of SSRI treatment) predict SSRI-associated remission in MDD. This raises the possibility that endogenous DHEA(S) abundance is a physiological adjunct to SSRI efficacy, as suggested by prior preclinical and clinical studies.

ObjectiveIncreased inflammation and oxidative stress have been shown in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), although there is significant heterogeneity across studies. Whether markers of inflammation and oxidative stress are associated with antidepressant treatment response in MDD is currently unclear. The goals of the present study are to investigate markers of inflammation and oxidative stress in unmedicated MDD subjects and controls and test the relationship between these markers and antidepressant response in MDD subjects.MethodsInterleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, C-reactive protein, F2-isoprostanes, 8-OH 2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), glutathione peroxidase, glutathione, and vitamin C were quantified in blood samples from 50 unmedicated MDD subjects and 55 healthy controls. Depression symptom severity was rated with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). All subjects were somatically healthy and free from medications that could interfere with inflammation and oxidative stress markers. A subgroup of 22 MDD subjects underwent open-label selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant treatment for eight weeks, after which blood sampling and the HDRS were repeated. Antidepressant treatment "response" was defined as ≥50% decrease in HDRS ratings over 8 weeks of treatment.ResultsAfter controlling for the effects of age, sex, body mass index and smoking, MDD subjects had significantly higher levels of IL-6 (p

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has been implicated in the therapeutic action of antidepressants and possibly in the pathophysiology of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Clinical studies of peripheral blood levels of BDNF in MDD have provided conflicting results, and there are also conflicting reports regarding the predictive value of peripheral BDNF levels for antidepressant treatment response. The present study investigated the association between serum BDNF levels, the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism (rs6265), clinical characteristics and SSRI treatment response. This open-label clinical trial included 99 physically healthy, unmedicated MDD participants and 70 healthy controls. Following a baseline assessment, 53 of the MDD participants completed an eight-week, open-label course of SSRI antidepressant treatment. Serum BDNF levels and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS) ratings were examined at baseline and after eight weeks of treatment. Antidepressant response was defined as a decrease in HDRS ratings of > 50% from baseline to the end-of-treatment. Finally, serum BDNF levels and SSRI treatment response were compared between MDD participants who were heterozygous or homozygous for the Met allele ("Met-carriers") and individuals homozygous for the Val allele. Serum BDNF levels at baseline were significantly higher in the unmedicated MDD participants compared to healthy controls (15.90 ng/ml vs 13.75 ng/ml, t (167) = −2.041, p = 0.043). In a post-hoc analysis, this difference was seen in the female but not male participants (16.85 ng/ml vs 14.06 ng/ml, t (91) = −2.067, p = 0.042; 14.86 ng/ml vs 13.31 ng/ml, t (74) = −0.923, p = 0.359). Baseline serum BDNF levels were not associated with treatment responder status or with absolute change in depression ratings over the course of 8-week SSRI treatment (p = 0.599). In both Responders and Non-responders, no significant changes in serum BDNF levels were found over the 8-week period of SSRI-treatment (16.32 ng/ml vs 16.23 ng/ml, t (18) = 0.060, p = 0.953; 16.04 ng/ml vs 15.61 ng/ml, t (29) = 0.438, p = 0.665, respectively). Further, no differences were found in serum BDNF levels prior to treatment between MDD Met-carriers and MDD Val/Val homozygotes (15.32 ng/ml vs 16.36 ng/ml, t (85) = 0.747, p = 0.457), and no differences were found in post-treatment serum BDNF (F 1,42 = 0.031 , p = 0.862). However, MDD Val/Val homozygotes showed significantly greater antidepressant responses at week 8 than did MDD Met-carriers (F 1,46 = 4.366 , p = 0.043). Our results do not support sufficient reliability of using peripheral BDNF to characterize depression or to predict antidepressant response in clinical use. The role of sex in moderating BDNF differences in depression, and the role of BDNF gene polymorphisms in predicting antidepressant response, remain to be further investigated. We conclude that, while central nervous system BDNF is likely involved in antidepressant efficacy and in aspects of MDD pathophysiology, its reflection in serum BDNF levels is of limited diagnostic or prognostic utility. • This study investigated the association between serum BDNF, the Val66Met polymorphism, and SSRI treatment response in MDD. • Serum BDNF levels at baseline were significantly elevated in unmedicated MDD compared to healthy controls. • Baseline serum BDNF levels and changes in serum BDNF with treatment were not associated with 8-week SSRI treatment response. • MDD Val/Val homozygotes (rs6265) showed greater antidepressant responses at week 8 than did MDD Met-carrying individuals. • Our results do not support sufficient reliability of serum BDNF to characterize MDD or to predict treatment response in clinical use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The effects of escitalopram vary markedly among MDD patients, and approximately one-third of patients fail to respond. A poor antidepressant response might be associated with excessively high C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, but the impact is not clear. We hypothesized that in adults with major depressive disorder, the peripheral biomarker, CRP, was associated with the response to escitalopram (SSRI).Methods: This was a prospective follow-up study. All 71 patients were treated with escitalopram for 12 weeks. Blood samples were collected at baseline and week 12. Remission was defined as a score of 7 or less on the HAMD-17 scale at week 12. Spearman correlations and multiple linear regressions were used to explore the relationship between continuous CRP levels and the HAMD-17 scores. Logistic regression was used to determine the predictors for remission. The restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used to examine the change of the HAMD-17 total scores between high and low CRP groups.Results: Compared with the high CRP group (≥0.8 mg/l), the low baseline CRP group had a higher remission rate (22.73% vs. 48.89%, χ2 = 4.2, p = 0.0403). Logistic regression revealed that patients with lower CRPs were 3.920 times (95% CI: 1.142, 13.460) more likely to experience remission (p = 0.0300). The multiple linear regression model showed that the HAMD-17 total score reduction (baseline to week 12) was negatively correlated with the baseline CRP level (t = -2.00, p = 0.0494).Conclusions: We observed a predictive role of CRP for remission and symptomatic improvement after escitalopram treatment of MDD patients based on continuous or categorical CRP levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction The close association among thyroid metabolism, mood disorders and behavior has long been known. The role of basal thyroid axis in antidepressant treatment response is less known. Objectives The aim of the present study was to study the association of basal serum thyrotropin (TSH) levels, with antidepressant treatment response in major depressive disorder. Methods Thirty-one depressed adult outpatients were included. Major depressive episode was diagnosed through the MINI (DSM-IV-TR) interview. Clinical symptomatology and blood samples were assessed at baseline, and at 4- and 8-weeks of either escitalopram or sertraline. Treatment response was defined by an improvement ≥50% in MADRS scores at 4-, and 8-weeks. Basal TSH levels were included in a linear regression model as predictor of treatment response. Results Twenty-seven patients finished 8-weeks of treatment. Response to treatment was of 74% at 4-weeks, and 63% at 8-weeks of antidepressant treatment. Basal median TSH levels were between normal ranges (M+SD=1.85+1,02 mlU/L). Basal TSH levels not correlated with basal MADRS scores, but with higher MADRS scores at week-4 (r=0,415, p=0,031) and at week-8 (r=0,392, p=0,043). Moreover, less baseline TSH levels trend to be a significant good predictor for treatment response at 4-weeks (R2=.116, p=.083); and a good predictor at 8-weeks treatment (R2=.147, p=.049). Conclusions Baseline TSH levels even within the normal range may play a role in predicting antidepressant response. Disclosure No significant relationships.

ObjectiveThis first pilot study of genome-wide expression as predictor of antidepressant response in late-life depression examined genome-wide transcriptional profiles in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of combined methylphenidate and citalopram.MethodsGenome-wide transcriptional profiles were examined in peripheral blood leukocytes sampled at baseline and 16 weeks from 35 older adults with major depression, who were randomized to methylphenidate + citalopram, citalopram + placebo, or methylphenidate + placebo. Methylphenidate doses ranged between 10 and 40 mg/day, and citalopram doses ranged between 20 and 60 mg/day. Remission was defined as Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of 6 or below. Early remission was achieved in the first 4 weeks of treatment. We hypothesized that differential gene expression at baseline can predict antidepressant response.ResultsWe analyzed gene expression in 24 remitters and 11 non-remitters. At baseline, we found three genes showing higher expression in all remitters versus non-remitters that satisfied the established level of significance: a fold change of 2 and p-value of 0.05 that included HLA-DRB5, SELENBP1, and LOC388588. Two gene transcripts showed higher expression in early remitters at baseline compared with non-remitters. The first gene was CA1 carbonic anhydrase gene, on chromosome 8 involved in respiratory function (fold change 2.54; p = 0.03). The second gene was the SNCA-α-synuclein gene, implicated, which binds to dopamine transporter (fold change 2.1; p = 0.03).ConclusionsRemission to antidepressants in geriatric depression may be associated with a particular gene expression profile in monoaminergic and metabolic pathways and needs to be replicated in a larger sample.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) represents one of the most promising tools in clinical practice to optimise antidepressant treatment. Nevertheless, little is still known regarding the relationship between clinical efficacy and serum concentration of venlafaxine (VEN). The aim of our study was to investigate the association between serum concentration of venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine (SCVO) and antidepressant response (AR). 52 depressed outpatients treated with VEN were recruited and followed in a naturalistic setting for three months. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-21 was administered at baseline, at month 1 and at month 3 to assess AR. SCVO was measured at steady state. Linear regression analysis and nonlinear least-squares regression were used to estimate association between SCVO and AR. Our results showed an association between AR and SCVO that follows a bell-shaped quadratic function with a progressive increase of AR within the therapeutic reference range of SCVO (i.e. 100–400 ng/mL) and a subsequent decrease of AR at higher serum levels. This study strongly suggests that TDM could represent a more appropriate tool than the oral dosage to optimise the treatment with VEN. Specifically, highest efficacy might be achieved by titrating patients at SCVO levels around 400 ng/mL [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The diversity of treatment outcomes for major depressive disorder (MDD) remains uncertain in neuropathology. The current study aimed at exploring electrophysiological biomarkers associated with treatment response. Methods: The present study recruited 130 subjects including 100 MDD patients and 30 healthy controls. All subjects participated in a sad expression recognition task while their magnetoencephalography data were recorded. Patients who had a reduction of at least 50% in disorder severity at endpoint (>2 weeks) were considered as responders. Within‐frequency power and phase‐amplitude coupling were measured for the brain regions involved in the emotional visual information processing pathways. Results: The significant alpha–gamma decoupling from the right thalamus to the right amygdala in unconscious processing and from right orbital frontal cortices to the right amygdala in conscious processing was found in non‐responders relative to responders and healthy controls. These kinds of dysregulation could also predict the potential treatment response. Conclusion: The attenuated alpha–gamma coupling in dual pathways indicated increased sensitivity to the negative emotional information and reduced moderated effect of the amygdala, which might cause insensitivity to antidepressant treatment and could be regarded as potential neural mechanisms for treatment response prediction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We aimed to identify the individual and interactive effects of childhood abuse and suicidal ideation on antidepressant treatment response in 12 months., Methods: In this prospective research, 1,262 depressive patients were asked about their childhood abuse history, suicidal ideation, and other clinical characteristics and socio-demographic features at baseline, and 1,015 of them were followed during 1 year of stepwise pharmacotherapy. The individual and interactive relationships of the childhood abuse history and suicidal ideation on 12-month antidepressant non-remission were explored by logistic regression with relevant covariates., Results: Having a childhood abuse history and higher suicidal ideation significantly predicted a non-remission state in 12 months respectively. The interaction term of childhood abuse and suicidal ideation was also significantly related to a non-remission state at 12 months. To be specific, in the low suicidal ideation group, depressive patients with a childhood abuse history were more likely to be in a non-remission state after 12 months of medication. In the high suicidal ideation group, however, childhood abuse history was not significantly associated with the non-remission state at 12 months., Conclusion: The childhood abuse history and the level of suicidal ideation are informative factors predicting the long-term results of antidepressant treatment, especially when they are combined. Clinicians may consider antidepressants with a higher affinity for patients with childhood abuse history even if they don't have suicidal ideation. The cognitive intervention for suicidal ideation might be helpful in addition to pharmacological treatment.

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common, chronic, debilitating mood disorder that causes serious functional impairment and significantly decreased quality of life. Pharmacotherapy represents the first-line treatment option; however, only approximately one third of patients respond to the first treatment because of the ineffectiveness or side effects of antidepressants. Precision medicine in psychiatry might offer clinicians the possibility to tailor treatment according to the best possible evidence of efficacy and tolerability for each subject. In this context, our study aims to carry out a clinical validation of a combinatorial pharmacogenomics (PGx) test in an Italian MDD patient cohort with advocacy license independence.Methods: Our study is a prospective participant- and rater-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical observational trial enrolling 300 MDD patients who are referred to psychiatric services to receive a new antidepressant due to the failure of their current treatment and/or the onset of adverse effects. Eligible participants are randomized to the TGTG group (Treated with Genetic Test Guide) or TAU group (Treated as Usual). For all subjects, DNA is collected with a buccal brush. The primary outcome is the reduction in depressive symptomatology. The secondary outcomes involve a range of scales that assess MDD symptoms and social functioning outcomes. The assessment is performed at four timepoints: baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks.Discussion: This project represents the first randomized controlled clinical trial to investigate whether a non-commercial PGx test improves outcomes in an MDD naturalistic cohort. Moreover, the identification of new genetic variants associated with non-response or side effects will improve the efficacy of the test, leading to further cost-saving.Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04615234. Registered on November 4, 2020. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with increased allostatic load (AL; a measure of physiological costs of repeated/chronic stress-responding) and metabolic dysregulation (MetD; a measure of metabolic health and precursor to many medical illnesses). Though AL and MetD are associated with poor somatic health outcomes, little is known regarding their relationship with antidepressant-treatment outcomes. Methods: We determined pre-treatment AL and MetD in 67 healthy controls and 34 unmedicated, medically healthy MDD subjects. Following this, MDD subjects completed 8-weeks of open-label selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant treatment and were categorized as 'Responders' (⩾50% improvement in depression severity ratings) or 'Non-responders' (<50% improvement). Logistic and linear regressions were performed to determine if pre-treatment AL or MetD scores predicted SSRI-response. Secondary analyses examined cross-sectional differences between MDD and control groups. Results: Pre-treatment AL and MetD scores significantly predicted continuous antidepressant response (i.e. absolute decreases in depression severity ratings) (p = 0.012 and 0.014, respectively), as well as post-treatment status as a Responder or Non-responder (p = 0.022 and 0.040, respectively), such that higher pre-treatment AL and MetD were associated with poorer SSRI-treatment outcomes. Pre-treatment AL and MetD of Responders were similar to Controls, while those of Non-responders were significantly higher than both Responders (p = 0.025 and 0.033, respectively) and Controls (p = 0.039 and 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that indices of metabolic and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis dysregulation are associated with poorer SSRI-treatment response. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that these markers of medical disease risk also predict poorer antidepressant outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Major depressive disorder (MDD) constitutes the leading cause of disability worldwide. Although efficacious antidepressant pharmacotherapies exist for MDD, only about 40-60% of the patients respond to initial treatment. However, there is still a lack of robustly established and applicable biomarkers for antidepressant response in everyday clinical practice. Objectives This study targets the assessment of the vasopressin (AVP) surrogate marker Copeptin (CoP), as a potential peripheral hypothalamic-level biomarker of antidepressant treatment response in MDD. Methods We measured baseline and dynamic levels of plasma CoP along with plasma ACTH and cortisol (CORT) in drug-naive outpatients with MDD before and after overnight manipulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis [i.e., stimulation (metyrapone) and suppression (dexamethasone)] on three consecutive days and their association with treatment response to 4 weeks of escitalopram treatment. Results Our findings suggest significantly higher baseline and post-metyrapone plasma CoP levels in future non-responders, a statistically significant invert association between baseline CoP levels and probability of treatment response and a potential baseline plasma CoP cut-off level of above 2.9 pmol/L for future non-response screening. Baseline and dynamic plasma ACTH and CORT levels showed no association with treatment response. Conclusions This pilot study provide first evidence in humans that CoP may represent a novel, clinically easily applicable, endocrine biomarker of antidepressant response, based on a single-measurement, cut-off level. These findings, underline the role of the vasopressinergic system in the pathophysiology of MDD and may represent a significant new tool in the clinical and biological phenotyping of MDD enhancing individual-tailored therapies.

Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide and improving its treatment is a core research priority for future programmes. A change in the view of psychological and biological processes, from seeing them as separate to complementing one another, has introduced new perspectives on pathological mechanisms of depression and treatment mode of action. This review presents a theoretical model that incorporated this novel approach, the cognitive neuropsychological hypothesis of antidepressant action. This model proposes that antidepressant treatments decrease the negative bias in the processing of emotionally salient information early in the course of antidepressant treatment, which leads to the clinically significant mood improvement later in treatment. The paper discusses the role of negative affective biases in the development of depression and response to antidepressant treatments. It also discusses whether the model can be applied to other antidepressant interventions and its potential translational value, including treatment choice, prediction of response and drug development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Alterations in gray matter (GM) have been recognized as playing an important role in the neurobiological mechanism underlying major depressive disorder (MDD) and antidepressant responses. However, little is known about white matter (WM) connectivity in MDD, leaving an incomplete understanding of the pathophysiology of the disorder.Purpose: To examine the functional connectivity (FC) of WM, GM, and WM-GM in MDD patients and explore the relationship between FC and antidepressant response.Study Type: Longitudinal study.Subjects: In all, 129 MDD patients and 89 healthy controls (HC).Field Strength/sequence: Whole-brain blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) single-shot echo planar imaging was acquired at 3.0T.Assessment: At baseline, all participants received Hamilton depression rating scale (HAMD) assessment and an fMRI scan. After 2- and 8-week antidepressant treatment, patients completed the HAMD again. The HAMD reductive rate of 2- and 8-weeks were calculated.Statistical Tests: The comparisons of age, education, HAMD scores, and FC values (false discovery rate correction) between patients and controls were calculated with a two-sample t-test. The chi-square test was employed to compare the differences of gender between these two groups. Correlations between FC and HAMD, as well as the reductive rate of HAMD, were analyzed with Pearson or Spearman correlation. Receiver operator curve analysis was performed to predict the antidepressant response.Results: Compared to HC, MDD patients exhibited widespread decreases in FC of WM-GM. Furthermore, 28 GM regions and 11 WM bundles had lower connectivity in MDD patients. At baseline, four FC of WM-GM showed negative correlations with the HAMD scores. Six FC of WM-GM correlated with the 2-week reductive rate of HAMD. Moreover, FC in GM, WM, and WM-GM also exhibited significantly positive correlations with an 8-week reductive rate of HAMD.Data Conclusion: The FC of WM-GM was decreased in MDD and may play a role in its pathophysiology and antidepressant responses.Level Of Evidence: 2.Technical Efficacy Stage: 2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Functional and structural MRI of prefrontal cortex (PFC) may provide putative biomarkers for predicting the treatment response to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in depression. A recent MRI study from ELECT-TDCS (Escitalopram versus Electrical Direct-Current Theror Depression Study) showed that depression improvement after tDCS was associated with gray matter volumes of PFC subregions. Based thereon, we investigated whether antidepressant effects of tDCS are similarly associated with baseline resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC). A subgroup of 51 patients underwent baseline rsFC-MRI. All patients of ELECT-TDCS were randomized to three treatment arms for 10 weeks (anodal-left, cathodal-right PFC tDCS plus placebo medication; escitalopram 10 mg/day for 3 weeks and 20 mg/day thereafter plus sham tDCS; and placebo medication plus sham tDCS). RsFC was calculated for various PFC regions and analyzed in relation to the individual antidepressant response. There was no significant association between baseline PFC connectivity of essential structural regions, nor any other PFC regions (after correction for multiple comparisons) and patients' individual antidepressant response. This study did not reveal an association between antidepressants effects of tDCS and baseline rsFC, unlike the gray matter volume findings. Thus, the antidepressant effects of tDCS may be differentially related to structural and functional MRI measurements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Raised pro-inflammatory immune/inflammatory setpoints, leading to an increased production of peripheral cytokines, have been associated with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and with failure to respond to first-line antidepressant drugs. However, the usefulness of these biomarkers in clinical psychopharmacology has been questioned because single findings did not translate into the clinical practice, where patients are prescribed treatments upon clinical need. We studied a panel of 27 inflammatory biomarkers in a sample of 108 inpatients with MDD, treated with antidepressant monotherapy for 4 weeks upon clinical need in a specialized hospital setting, and assessed the predictive effect of baseline peripheral measures of inflammation on antidepressing efficacy (response rates and time-lagged pattern of decrease of depression severity) using a machine-learning approach with elastic net penalized regression, and multivariate analyses in the context of the general linear model. When considering both categorical and continuous measures of response, baseline levels of IL-1β predicted non-response to antidepressants, with the predicted probability to respond being highly dispersed at low levels of IL-1β, and stratifying toward non-response when IL-1β is high. Significant negative effects were also detected for TNF-α, while IL-12 weakly predicted response. These findings support the usefulness of inflammatory biomarkers in the clinical psychopharmacology of depression, and add to ongoing research efforts aiming at defining reliable cutoff values to identify depressed patients in clinical settings with high inflammation, and low probability to respond. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous evidence has suggested that norepinephrine transporter (NET) gene (solute carrier family 6, member 2 [SLC6A2]) polymorphisms are involved in antidepressant response. Specifically, the polymorphism T-182C (rs2242446) located in the promoter region of SLC6A2 has been found to be associated with antidepressant response in multiple ethnic backgrounds. However, the results are inconsistent. Moreover, few studies have focused on how this T-182C polymorphism might regulate SLC6A2 promoter function. Methods: In this study, luciferase reporter assays were performed to examine the functional significance of the T-182C polymorphism. In addition, we performed a meta-analysis to explore whether this genetic variant is significantly involved in the antidepressant response. Results: We found that the −182(T) allele significantly increased promoter function compared to the C allele based on luciferase reporter assays. For the meta-analysis, six articles were identified that explored the relationship between the NET T-182C polymorphisms and antidepressant response. This study revealed no significant association between these polymorphisms and response to antidepressants (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.77 − 1.97, p = 0.38 for T-182C). Conclusions: The T-182C polymorphism enhances promoter activity, but may not be associated with antidepressant response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Standard guidelines recommend selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors as first-line antidepressants for adults with major depressive disorder, but success is limited and patients who fail to benefit are often switched to non–selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor agents. This study investigated whether brain- and behavior-based markers of reward processing might be associated with response to bupropion after sertraline nonresponse. In a two-stage, double-blinded clinical trial, 296 participants were randomized to receive 8 weeks of sertraline or placebo in stage 1. Individuals who responded continued on another 8-week course of the same intervention in stage 2, while sertraline and placebo nonresponders crossed over to bupropion and sertraline, respectively. Data from 241 participants were analyzed. The stage 2 sample comprised 87 patients with major depressive disorder who switched medication and 38 healthy control subjects. A total of 116 participants with major depressive disorder treated with sertraline in stage 1 served as an independent replication sample. The probabilistic reward task and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging were administered at baseline. Greater pretreatment reward sensitivity and higher resting-state functional connectivity between bilateral nucleus accumbens and rostral anterior cingulate cortex were associated with positive response to bupropion but not sertraline. Null findings for sertraline were replicated in the stage 1 sample. Pretreatment reward sensitivity and frontostriatal connectivity may identify patients likely to benefit from bupropion following selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor failures. Results call for a prospective replication based on these biomarkers to advance clinical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Massive research has examined the cause of major depressive disorder (MDD) and accumulating evidence has revealed that the gene for the norepinephrine transporter (NET) is involved in MDDs etiology as well as the antidepressant response. The G1287A (rs5569, GRCh38, Chromosome 16, 55697923) is located in the exon 9 region of the SLC6A2 gene. It was found to be connected with MDD and antidepressant response in people of different genetic ancestries. However, the results are still inconsistent. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the overall association of rs5569 polymorphisms with MDD and the antidepressant response. Results: Sixteen articles that studied the connection between the G1287A polymorphism and MDD or antidepressant response were identified, and their outcomes revealed there was a significant connection between the polymorphisms and MDD and antidepressant response. Our study indicated that the GG genotype may be a protection factor against the development of MDD [odds ratio (OR = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.64–0.96, P = 0.02 for Asian population; OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.63–0.98, P = 0.03 for Han Chinese population] while the GG genotype had a worse antidepressant response (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.25–0.94, P = 0.03). Conclusions: NET G1287A polymorphisms are involved in the etiology of MDD and antidepressant response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]