Search

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of anti-TNF (biological) therapies on the incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional analysis of 50 diabetic patients with rheumatic diseases (group 1) was performed. An age-, sex-, and HbA1c-matched control group (group 2) was formed from a pool of diabetic patients who underwent regular eye examinations. The presence or absence of diabetic retinopathy was also assessed. Comorbidities such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, and hyperlipidemia were also evaluated as possible confounding factors. Results: Hundred eyes of 50 patients were evaluated in each group. Only three patients in group 1 had non-proliferative retinopathy. The median duration of rheumatic disease was 9 years, whereas that of diabetes was 11 years. The mean duration of anti-TNF therapy was 4 years. In the control group of diabetes-only patients, 13 patients developed some form of newly diagnosed diabetic retinopathy during the last five years. The calculated retinopathy occurrence between the groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05). In this study, the incidence rate ratio for patients receiving anti-TNF treatment was calculated as 0.4 in the study. Conclusion: TNF inhibitors, with their anti-inflammatory effects, positively impact diabetic complications by reducing the incidence of retinopathy. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate retinopathy development after anti-TNF therapy. Key messages: What is Known: • Inhibition of TNF? is known to be beneficial in reducing the risk of diabetes itself in rheumatic disease patients. • Disorders related to TNF? and its pathways are critical contributors to microvascular complications, such as prolif?erative retinopathy. What is New: • Our preliminary data shows that TNF inhibitors positively impact retinal microvasculature, lowering diabetic reti?nopathy incidence. • Glycemic control is potentially the most critical parameter of the development of diabetic complications in rheumatic disease patients, even under effective anti-inflammatory treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Indication of conventional anti-TNF and immunosuppressant (thiopurine, methotrexate) combination therapy is questionable due to the risk of immunogenicity and a poorer safety profile than the new biotherapies, for which the rationale for use in combination has not been demonstrated. Nonetheless, it continues to play a major role in IBD in patients naive of biologics, with less evidence for adalimumab and with methotrexate, which remains however a valid therapeutic option in elderly patients and those with severe comorbidities. Its use in severe acute colitis in UC is well documented, and its use in fistulizing anal lesions in Crohn's disease is recommended in current practice. Combination therapy is also an option in moderate-to-severe UC and Crohn's disease. When switching anti-TNF agents, the combination with an immunosuppressant is mandatory, as it improves treatment efficacy, mainly by reducing the risk of immunogenicity. In case of clinico-biological remission, a discontinuation of the immunosuppressant after 6 to 12 months should be discussed in order to limit the risk of toxicity. As experience with combiotherapies (combination of biologics) is limited and the safety profile uncertain, conventional combotherapy remains a major therapeutic option in IBD in 2024. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The management of Crohn’s disease (CD) in the Middle East, like in other parts of the world, is rapidly evolving with the introduction of novel advanced medical and biological therapies. In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), several biological therapies are used to achieve remission in severe and resistant cases of CD. We carried out a literature search to analyze the effectiveness and safety of biologic treatments currently licensed in the UAE. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases from inception to January 2020 to identify relevant studies. Search terms were generated using established treatment guidelines for CD. We also manually searched the bibliographies of relevant literature to obtain additional papers. Results: Biologic and small molecule agents for CD include four core drug classes: anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents (TNF-α), integrin receptor antagonists, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and IL-12/IL-23 antagonists. All drug classes showed good efficacy and safety in managing patients with CD. Some drug classes had distinguishable side effect profiles. This included an increased lymphoma and tuberculous risk for TNF-α and integrin receptor antagonists. Many trials supported the effectiveness of these licensed drugs. Biologic agent intolerance was common; one-third of patients receiving TNF-α treatment will develop intolerance to that specific drug. Conclusions: Advanced medical therapies licensed in the UAE have proven to be safe and efficacious. Additional research is required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of newer biologics and biosimilars.

Abstract Introduction The risk of infections associated with biological drugs (BD) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) has been extensively explored in the literature. However, there is a dearth of studies that evaluate both pharmacological groups together and, furthermore, compare them. Here, we review the risk of infections associated with BD and JAKi used in dermatology. Methods A narrative review was performed. All relevant articles evaluating the risk of infection and opportunistic infections with BD and JAKi between January 2010 and February 2024 were selected. Results Overall, the incidence of infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections associated with BD and JAKi is low, but higher than in the general population. JAKi approved for dermatological disorders (abrocitinib, baricitinib, deucravacitinib, upadacitinib, ritlecitinib, and topical ruxolitinib) have been shown to be safe, and present a low rate of infections. We found an elevated risk, especially with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, rituximab, and JAKi (particularly tofacitinib at high doses). Specific associations with infections include tuberculosis and tuberculosis reactivation with anti-TNF agents and tocilizumab; candidiasis with anti-interleukin (IL) 17 agents; hepatitis B virus reactivation with rituximab, anti-TNF, and JAKi; and herpes simplex and herpes zoster infections with JAKi (especially tofacitinib and upadacitinib at high doses). The incidence of infections with ustekinumab and anti-IL-23 was very low. Anti-IL-1, nemolizumab, tralokinumab, and omalizumab were not associated with an increased risk of infections. Dupilumab could decrease the incidence of cutaneous infections. Conclusions Anti-TNF agents, rituximab, and JAKi (particularly tofacitinib) can increase the risk of infections. Close monitoring of patients undergoing these therapies is recommended. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are needed to comparatively evaluate the risks of infection deriving from treatment with BD and JAKi.

Objectives Extra-osseous (EO) manifestations are poorly characterized in chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO). This study aimed to further define the frequency, characteristics and treatment of EO events in CRMO and whether different phenotypes can be distinguished and benefit from special management. Methods This multicentre retrospective study included CRMO patients followed in several paediatric rheumatology departments in France between 2015 and 2022. EO manifestations were defined as skin lesions, gastrointestinal manifestations, arthritis, enthesitis, sacroiliitis, uveitis, vasculitis and fever. At the last visit, the physician defined CRMO as active in the presence of clinical manifestations including both osseous and EO symptoms. Results We included 133 patients; 87 (65.4%) were girls and the median age at first symptoms was 9.0 years (interquartile range 7.0–10.0). EO manifestations were described in 90 (67.7%) patients, with a predominance of skin lesions [ n  = 51/90 (56.7%)], followed by sacroiliitis [ n  = 38/90 (42.2%)], enthesitis [ n  = 21/90 (23.3%)], arthritis [ n  = 14/90 (15.6%)] and gastrointestinal manifestations [ n  = 6/90 (6.7%)]. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and bisphosphonates did not differ by the presence or not of EO manifestations. Biologics were taken more frequently by patients with than without EO manifestations (P  < 0.001); TNF inhibitors were used in 33 (36.7%) EO-positive patients. Under this treatment, 18 (54.5%) patients achieved complete remission of osseous and EO manifestations. At the last visit, more EO+ than EO− patients were on treatment (P  = 0.009), with active disease in 58 (64.4%) patients. Conclusion The analysis of EO manifestations in CRMO delineates two groups of patients in terms of severity and treatments used. Our study opens up new pathophysiological leads that may underlie the wide range of CRMO phenotypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The management of Crohn's disease (CD) in the Middle East, like in other parts of the world, is rapidly evolving with the introduction of novel advanced medical and biological therapies. In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), several biological therapies are used to achieve remission in severe and resistant cases of CD. We carried out a literature search to analyze the effectiveness and safety of biologic treatments currently licensed in the UAE. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases from inception to January 2020 to identify relevant studies. Search terms were generated using established treatment guidelines for CD. We also manually searched the bibliographies of relevant literature to obtain additional papers. Results: Biologic and small molecule agents for CD include four core drug classes: anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents (TNF-α), integrin receptor antagonists, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and IL-12/IL-23 antagonists. All drug classes showed good efficacy and safety in managing patients with CD. Some drug classes had distinguishable side effect profiles. This included an increased lymphoma and tuberculous risk for TNF-α and integrin receptor antagonists. Many trials supported the effectiveness of these licensed drugs. Biologic agent intolerance was common; one-third of patients receiving TNF-α treatment will develop intolerance to that specific drug. Conclusions: Advanced medical therapies licensed in the UAE have proven to be safe and efficacious. Additional research is required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of newer biologics and biosimilars. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aplastic anemia is a rare and heterogeneous disease that causes pancytopenia and aplasia of the bone marrow. It is characterized by a failure of hematopoiesis. It is believed that approximately 65% of cases of acquired aplastic anemia are idiopathic. In a subset of cases, a drug or infection is the cause of bone marrow failure. This case report presents a 38-year-old patient with axial spondylarthritis who developed pancytopenia and was diagnosed with aplastic anemia during anti-TNF-α treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The risk of infections associated with biological drugs (BD) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) has been extensively explored in the literature. However, there is a dearth of studies that evaluate both pharmacological groups together and, furthermore, compare them. Here, we review the risk of infections associated with BD and JAKi used in dermatology. Methods: A narrative review was performed. All relevant articles evaluating the risk of infection and opportunistic infections with BD and JAKi between January 2010 and February 2024 were selected. Results: Overall, the incidence of infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections associated with BD and JAKi is low, but higher than in the general population. JAKi approved for dermatological disorders (abrocitinib, baricitinib, deucravacitinib, upadacitinib, ritlecitinib, and topical ruxolitinib) have been shown to be safe, and present a low rate of infections. We found an elevated risk, especially with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, rituximab, and JAKi (particularly tofacitinib at high doses). Specific associations with infections include tuberculosis and tuberculosis reactivation with anti-TNF agents and tocilizumab; candidiasis with anti-interleukin (IL) 17 agents; hepatitis B virus reactivation with rituximab, anti-TNF, and JAKi; and herpes simplex and herpes zoster infections with JAKi (especially tofacitinib and upadacitinib at high doses). The incidence of infections with ustekinumab and anti-IL-23 was very low. Anti-IL-1, nemolizumab, tralokinumab, and omalizumab were not associated with an increased risk of infections. Dupilumab could decrease the incidence of cutaneous infections. Conclusions: Anti-TNF agents, rituximab, and JAKi (particularly tofacitinib) can increase the risk of infections. Close monitoring of patients undergoing these therapies is recommended. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are needed to comparatively evaluate the risks of infection deriving from treatment with BD and JAKi. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To study the efficacy and long-term effects of infliximab and adalimumab in patients with active refractory non-infectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis (NIPPU). Retrospective, longitudinal study. Included were 61 patients (104 eyes) of whom 34 were males (55.74%). Mean age at diagnosis of uveitis was 26.5 ± 16.14 years. All patients had active uveitis at baseline (time of initiation of biological therapy). Median interval between the start of conventional immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) to the introduction of biological therapy was 13.0 (IQR 26.0) months. Ocular inflammation was effectively controlled in 92 eyes (88.46%). The most commonly used TNF-α inhibitor was adalimumab in 47 patients (77%). Mean follow-up time after baseline was 40 ± 34.08 months. In the year preceding the institution of TNF-α inhibitors, the average number of flares was 1.5 ± 1.1/year and it decreased to 0.08 ± 0.29/year in the first year after baseline (p <.0005). Forty-four eyes (42.30%) experienced flare over the entire follow-up period. Mean time to first flare was 14.5 ± 9.26 months. At baseline, the mean dose of prednisone was 25.5-±20.8 mg/day. A marked decrease to a mean prednisone dose of 7.85 ± 9.7 mg/day was observed at 6 months (p =.03). In patients treated with adalimumab, the mean time to prednisone dose ≤7.5 mg/day was 4.02 ± 4.89 months compared to 15.64 ± 21.34 months in patients treated with infliximab (p =.03). 64.3% of patients treated by infliximab had Behçet uveitis compared to 27.7% of patients treated by adalimumab. Eyes treated with adalimumab experienced first flare at a mean time of 14.11 ± 6.29 months, whereas eyes treated with infliximab experienced first flare at 18.29 ± 14.24 months after baseline (p <.0005). The risk for moderate and severe visual loss was lower with shorter duration of uveitis before initiating anti-TNF-α treatment (odds ratio, 0.003; 95% CI, 0.000–0.005; p =.023), better presenting logMAR VA (odds ratio, 0.266; 95% CI, 0.172–0.361; p <.0005) and when adalimumab was used (odds ratio, 0.354; 95% CI, 0.190–0.519, p <.0005). Anti-TNF-α therapy was successful in controlling refractory NIPPU in the majority of cases. It significantly reduced flare rate, exerted steroid-sparing effects, and preserved visual potential. Adalimumab use, better initial visual acuity, and earlier introduction of anti-TNF- α therapy were associated with a lower risk of visual loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The optimal treatment of perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease [PFCD] is unknown. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to compare combined surgical intervention and anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] therapy [combined therapy] vs either therapy alone. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched systematically up to end December 2023. Surgical intervention was defined as an exam under anaesthesia ± setons. We calculated weighted risk ratios [RRs] with 95% confidence intervals [CIs] for our co-primary outcomes: fistula response and healing, defined clinically as a reduction in fistula drainage or number of draining fistulas and fistula closure respectively. Results Thirteen studies were analysed: 515 patients treated with combined therapy, 330 patients with surgical intervention, and 406 patients with anti-TNF therapy with follow-up between 10 weeks and 3 years. Fistula response [RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.93–1.30, p  = 0.28] and healing [RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.86–1.31, p  = 0.58] was not significantly different when comparing combined therapy with anti-TNF therapy alone. In contrast, combined therapy was associated with significantly higher rates of fistula response [RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.10–1.41, p  < 0.001] and healing [RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.00–1.36, p  = 0.05] compared with surgical intervention alone. Our results remained stable when limiting to studies that assessed outcomes within 1 year and studies where <10% of patients underwent fistula closure procedures. Conclusion Combined surgery and anti-TNF therapy was not associated with improved PFCD outcomes compared with anti-TNF therapy alone. Due to an inability to control for confounding and small study sizes, future, controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims Anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] treatment failure in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is common and frequently related to low drug concentrations. In order to identify patients who may benefit from dose optimisation at the outset of anti-TNF therapy, we sought to define epigenetic biomarkers in whole blood at baseline associated with anti-TNF drug concentrations at week 14. Methods DNA methylation from 1104 whole blood samples from 385 patients in the Personalised Anti-TNF Therapy in Crohn's disease [PANTS] study were assessed using the Illumina EPIC Beadchip [v1.0] at baseline and weeks 14, 30, and 54. We compared DNA methylation profiles in anti-TNF-treated patients who experienced primary non-response at week 14 if they were assessed at subsequent time points and were not in remission at week 30 or 54 [infliximab n = 99, adalimumab n = 94], with patients who responded at week 14 and when assessed at subsequent time points were in remission at week 30 or 54 [infliximab n = 99, adalimumab n = 93]. Results Overall, between baseline and week 14, we observed 4999 differentially methylated positions [DMPs] annotated to 2376 genes following anti-TNF treatment. Pathway analysis identified 108 significant gene ontology terms enriched in biological processes related to immune system processes and responses. Epigenome-wide association [EWAS] analysis identified 323 DMPs annotated to 210 genes at baseline associated with higher anti-TNF drug concentrations at Week 14. Of these, 125 DMPs demonstrated shared associations with other common traits [proportion of shared CpGs compared with DMPs] including body mass index [23.2%], followed by C-reactive protein [CRP] [11.5%], smoking [7.4%], alcohol consumption per day [7.1%], and IBD type [6.8%]. EWAS of primary non-response to anti-TNF identified 20 DMPs that were associated with both anti-TNF drug concentration and primary non-response to anti-TNF with a strong correlation of the coefficients [Spearman's rho = -0.94, p <0.001]. Conclusion Baseline DNA methylation profiles may be used as a predictor for anti-TNF drug concentration at week 14 to identify patients who may benefit from dose optimisation at the outset of anti-TNF therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) agents are effective in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but may entail a risk of lymphoma due to TNF-α's role in immune surveillance. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the risk of lymphoma in patients with RA treated with anti-TNF agents versus patients treated with methotrexate and/or a placebo. Materials and Methods: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, PubMed, and Google Scholar were systematically searched for relevant literature. Data were extracted and analyzed to determine risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with heterogeneity assessed using I2 statistics. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Results: The search yielded 932 articles, 13 of which were retained for qualitative review and 12 for quantitative synthesis. Overall, the studies reviewed included 181,735 participants: 3772 from six RCTs and 177,963 from seven observational studies. The meta-analysis of RCTs revealed no significant difference in the risk of lymphoma between patients receiving anti-TNF-α therapy and patients on conventional treatments, with an overall RR of 1.43 (95% CI: 0.32–5.16) and I2 of 0%. Conversely, observational studies showed some variability, with an overall RR of 1.43 (95% CI: 0.59–3.47) and significant heterogeneity (I2 = 95%), whereas others indicated a potentially elevated risk of lymphoma in specific subgroups but had inconsistent results. Conclusions: The systematic and meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in the risk of lymphoma for patients with RA treated with anti-TNF-α agents versus conventional therapies. However, given the limitations of the studies included, additional research is needed to validate the results and explore potential risk factors contributing to the development of lymphoma in patients with RA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary and secondary non-response affects approximately 50% of patients with Crohns disease treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibodies. To date, very little single cell research exists regarding drug repurposing in Crohns disease. We aimed to elucidate the cellular phenomena underlying resistance to anti-TNF therapy in patients with Crohns disease and to identify potential drug candidates for these patients. Single-cell transcriptome analyses were performed using data (GSE134809) from the Gene Expression Omnibus and Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures L1000 Project. Data aligned to the Genome Reference Consortium Human Build 38 reference genome using the Cell Ranger software were processed using the Seurat package. To capture significant functional terms, gene ontology functional enrichment analysis was performed on the marker genes. For biological analysis, 93,893 cells were retained (median 20,163 genes). Through marker genes, seven major cell lineages were identified: B-cells, T-cells, natural killer cells, monocytes, endothelial cells, epithelial cells, and tissue stem cells. In the anti-TNF-resistant samples, the top 10 differentially expressed genes were HLA-DQB-1, IGHG1, RPS23, RPL7A, ARID5B, LTB, STAT1, NAMPT, COTL1, ISG20, IGHA1, IGKC, and JCHAIN, which were robustly distributed in all cell lineages, mainly in B-cells. Through molecular function analyses, we found that the biological functions of both monocyte and T-cell groups mainly involved immune-mediated functions. According to multi-cluster drug repurposing prediction, vorinostat is the top drug candidate for patients with anti-TNF-refractory Crohns disease. Differences in cell populations and immune-related activity within tissues may influence the responsiveness of Crohns disease to anti-TNF agents. Vorinostat may serve as a promising novel therapy for anti-TNF-resistant Crohns disease.

Objective: Since adalimumab approval in childhood chronic non-infectious uveitis (cNIU), the prognosis has been dramatically changed, but the 25 % failed to achieve inactivity. There is not accordance if it is better to switch to another anti-TNF or to swap to another category of biologic. Thus, we aim to summarize evidence regarding the best treatment of cNIU refractory to the first anti-TNF. Methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis, according to PRISMA Guidelines, was performed(Jan2000-Aug2023). Studies investigating the efficacy of treatment in cNIU refractory to the first anti-TNF were considered for inclusion. The primary outcome was the improvement of intraocular inflammation according to SUN. A combined estimation of the proportion of children responding to switch or swap and for each drug was performed. Results: 23 articles were eligible, reporting 150 children of whom 109 switched anti-TNF (45 adalimumab, 49 infliximab, 9 golimumab) and 41 swapped to another biologics (31 abatacept, 8 tocilizumab and 1 rituximab). The proportion of responding children was 46 %(95 % CI 23-70) for switch and 38 %(95 % CI 8-73) for swap (χ20.02, p = 0.86). Instead analysing for each drug, the proportion of responding children was the 24 %(95 % CI 2-55) for adalimumab, 43 %(95 % CI 2-80) for abatacept, 79 %(95 % CI 61-93) for infliximab, 56 %(95 % CI 14-95) for golimumab and 96 %(95 % CI 58-100) for tocilizumab. We evaluated a superiority of tocilizumab and infliximab compared to the other drugs(χ2 27.5 p

Introduction The treatment of Behçet’s disease has improved significantly with the introduction of biologic therapies. However, there is still a need for more information about their use. This study aimed to evaluate the indications, response, and side effects of biologic agents in patients with refractory or severe Behçet’s disease in the south of Iran, their follow-up and reasons for changing the biologics. Material and methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 44 patients aged 16–65 years who were prescribed biologic agents for at least 6 months. The clinical history, partial and complete remission at 6 and 12 months, occurrence of side effects, and need for switching to a second or third biologic agent were recorded. Results The most common indications for starting biologic agents were ophthalmic (68.2%), parenchymal brain involvement (15.9%), and arthritis (11.4%). Improvement was observed in various manifestations of Behçet’s disease, with complete remission in 86, 51.6, 92.8, 66.7, 42.9, 33.3, and 80.0% of oral aphthous lesions, ophthalmic activity, genital aphthous lesions, skin activity, arthritis, brain parenchymal lesions, and vascular activity, respectively, 6 months after starting biologic agents. These rates were unchanged or increased at the 12-month follow-up. In 25.0% of patients, a switch to a second biologic agent was necessary due to severe disease, side effects, or refractory disease. Side effects occurred in 16.3% and 33.3% of patients on the first and second biologic agents, respectively. The majority of side effects were not serious. Conclusions We found a promising improvement at 6-month and 12-month follow-ups with various biologic agents in treating Behçet’s disease with an acceptable safety profile.

PurposeMethodsResultsConclusionsTo examine the demographic characteristics, findings and complication rates in patients with Behçet’s uveitis (BU) and to investigate the effect of early biological therapy on the development of complications.Medical records of 94 patients with BU were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, ocular findings and complications at presentation, complications during follow-up, and treatments received during follow-up were analyzed. Patients who were followed for at least 24 months were divided into two groups according to the time of presentation as Group 1 (between 2009 and 2015) and Group 2 (between 2016 and 2021). Complications at the time of presentation and during follow-up, and treatments were compared.We enrolled 94 patients with a male-to-female ratio of 1.94 with a mean age of 30 ± 12 years. Median follow-up was 58.1(12–163) months. There were 35 patients (66 eyes) in Group 1 and 33 patients (61 eyes) in Group 2. At the time of presentation, end-stage disease, cataract, epiretinal membrane, and optic atrophy were significantly more common in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p < 0.05). A significantly higher proportion of eyes in Group 1 developed macular edema, cataract, epiretinal membrane, and macular atrophy during-follow-up (p < 0.05). Median time to initiation of biological treatment was 17.29 months in Group 1 and 3.33 months in Group 2 (p < 0.001). The overall complication rate was significantly lower in Group 2.Prognosis of BU is improved after the introduction of biological treatment. Early use of biological agents in BU is effective in decreasing sight-threatening ocular complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Short-term placebo (PBO)- or active-controlled clinical studies have demonstrated that etanercept (ETN) is effective and well tolerated in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) with long-term efficacy and safety continuing for up to 7 years after treatment start. Short-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown the efficacy of ETN after 12–24 weeks, with statistically significant improvements as early as week 2. This post hoc analysis investigated the timeframe (i.e., temporal responses) in which patients with r-axSpA achieved their first clinical response with ETN and how patients responded over a longer period according to different temporal responses in index studies. Methods: Data were analyzed from three phase 3/4 PBO- or sulfasalazine-controlled RCTs of ETN for the treatment of r-axSpA (index studies). Long-term open-label extension (OLE) studies assessed how patients responded over a longer period according to different temporal responses ("Early," "Intermediate," "Late," or "Non-response") in their corresponding index studies. Results: Within each index study, patient responses differed significantly between ETN and control arms for achievement of Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) 20 and other measures of treatment response. In general, the proportion of responders in the OLE studies was high for those with "Early" and "Intermediate" responses as defined in the index studies. Despite patients being considered non-responders in the index studies, a large proportion achieved response on continued treatment in the OLE studies over the longer term, including through 48 weeks. Conclusions: Response in the index studies was maintained in the long term, and continued treatment was warranted in a large proportion of patients despite initial non-response. Absence of an early response in index studies did not predict non-response over the long term, and early response to treatment was not always a predictor for later response. Trial Registration: NCT00421915; NCT00247962; NCT00356356; NCT00421980; NCT00410046. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to the administration of infliximab (IFX) in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) patients are not rare and usually lead to drug discontinuation. We report data on safety and effectiveness of desensitization to IFX in patients with previous HSR. We conducted a retrospective monocentric observational study. Patients for whom a desensitization protocol to IFX was realized after a previous HSR were included. Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and IFX trough levels at both inclusion and six months after desensitization were collected. Clinical outcomes, including recurrence of HSR were evaluated. From 2005 to 2020, 27 patients (Crohn's Disease: 26 (96%) were included). Desensitization after HSR was performed after a median time of 10.4 months (2.9-33.1). Nineteen (70%) patients received immunosuppressants at time of desensitization. Eight (30%) patients presented HSR at first (n = 2), second (n = 4) or third (n = 2) IFX perfusion after desensitization. None led to intensive care unit transfer or death. Thirteen (48%) had clinical response at 6 months and 8 (29%) were still under IFX treatment two years after desensitization. IFX trough levels and ADA were available for 14 patients at time of desensitization. Most patients (12 out of 14) had ADA at a high level. At 6 months, among the 7 patients with long term response to IFX, 4 presented a decrease of ADA titers and 2 had a significant trough level of IFX. IFX desensitization in patients with IBD is a safe therapeutic alternative and represents a potential option for patients refractory to multiple biologics. What is already known? Hypersensitivity reactions to the administration of infliximab is frequent. Occurrence of hypersensitivity reaction, either immediate or delayed, usually leads to permanent drug discontinuation. What is new here? Infliximab desensitization is well tolerated with no hypersensitivity reaction recurrence in 70% of patients. Clinical success at 6 months was of 48% and around a third of patients remained under infliximab therapy two years after desensitization. Antidrug antibodies decreased and infliximab trough levels increased in these patients showing the impact of desensitization on immunogenicity. How can this study help patient care? Infliximab desensitization represents a potential option for patients refractory to multiple biologics who presented hypersensitivity reaction to the drug. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

La réaction paradoxale tuberculeuse est définie par l'aggravation de lésions tuberculeuses présentes au diagnostic ou l'apparition de nouvelles lésions en cours de traitement antituberculeux, en l'absence d'autre cause spécifique surajoutée. Sa prévalence est estimée entre 5 à 30 % des cas, et dépend des sites infectés et du terrain. Le diagnostic de réaction paradoxale est un diagnostic d'élimination, et il suppose notamment d'avoir exclu un échec thérapeutique, notamment lié à une mauvaise observance ou à la présence d'antibiorésistance. L'atteinte neurologique fait la gravité de cette manifestation clinique. Malgré l'importance clinique de la réaction paradoxale tuberculeuse, sa physiopathologie reste mal comprise et sa prise en charge peu consensuelle. Celle-ci repose essentiellement sur la corticothérapie. La place des anti-TNF, actuellement proposée en cas de corticodépendance ou corticorésistance, reste à définir. Paradoxical tuberculosis reaction is defined as the aggravation of lesions present at diagnosis or the development of new lesions under anti-tuberculosis treatment, after exclusion of other alternate causes. It affects 5 to 30% of tuberculosis patients, with a variable prevalence depending on the site of infection and the clinical background. The diagnosis of paradoxical reaction is one of elimination, and requires having ruled out therapeutic failure, notably linked to poor compliance and/or to the presence of mycobacterial antibiotic resistance. The severity of paradoxical tuberculosis reaction lies in its neurological impairment. Despite its clinical importance, the mechanisms involved remain poorly understood and its management is not consensual. Corticosteroids are the cornerstone in the medical management. The role of anti-TNF agents, currently proposed in cases of corticodependence or corticoresistance, remains to be properly defined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Hamidiye Medical Journal is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: The risk of atherosclerosis is increased in individuals with rheumatological disease. The objective of this study is to examine the heightened susceptibility to atherosclerosis in persons afflicted with rheumatological disorders. This study aimed to assess the impact of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) medication on the plasma atherogenic index (PAI) in persons diagnosed with rheumatological disease. Methods: This study used a retrospective cross-sectional design to investigate a cohort of 136 patients with rheumatological disease who were undergoing anti-TNF therapy (Group 1), as well as a comparison group of 117 patients getting conventional therapy (Group 2). Measurements of PAI were conducted at the initial baseline and again at the sixth month of treatment. Results: Initially, there was no statistically significant disparity observed in PAI values between the two cohorts. After a period of 6 months, a notable reduction in PAI was identified in the group receiving anti-TNF medication (P = 0.01), while no significant alteration was detected in the group receiving conventional treatment. Conclusion: It provides findings showing that anti-TNF therapy can reduce the PAI in individuals with rheumatological disease. This may indicate a potential cardiovascular protective effect of anti-TNF therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The objectives were as follows: (a) to identify, among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), "clusters" of patients based on the presence of peripheral and extra-musculoskeletal manifestations (EMMs) and (b) to compare the effectiveness of the first anti-TNF drugs across the different clusters after 6 months of follow-up. Methods: An observational and retrospective study of 90 axSpA patients naïve to bDMARDs was conducted. An unsupervised cluster analysis using the "k-means" technique was performed using variables of peripheral and EMMs. Baseline clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were evaluated, and the response to anti-TNF treatment (considering responders as those with an improvement ≥1.1 for the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) or ≥2.0 for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)) was compared across the clusters after 6 months of follow-up. Results: Two clusters were identified: cluster 1 (n = 14), with a higher prevalence of peripheral manifestations, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and HLA-B27-positive status, and a lower prevalence of uveitis in comparison with cluster 2 (n = 76). Patients from cluster 1 experienced a more pronounced absolute improvement in ASDAS and BASDAI indices after 6 months. The percentage of responders after 6 months of follow-up was superior in cluster 1 compared to cluster 2 (85.7% vs. 48.7%, p = 0.011). Conclusion: This study suggests the existence of two clinical profiles in axSpA patients according to the peripheral and EMMs, with higher rates of anti-TNF effectiveness after 6 months in those with a greater presence of peripheral features. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ozoralizumab is a bispecific NANOBODY compound that binds tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and human serum albumin. Ozoralizumab inhibits the TNFα physiological activity while maintaining long‐term plasma retention owing to its human serum albumin–binding ability. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed using data from 494 Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Phase II/III and Phase III trials to assess the effects of potential PK covariates. The ozoralizumab PK after subcutaneous administration was described using a 1‐compartment model with first‐order absorption and first‐order elimination processes. A proportional error model was used for inter‐ and intra‐individual variabilities, with covariance set between inter‐individual variabilities of the apparent clearance and apparent distribution volume. Body weight, sex, antidrug antibody status, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and concomitant methotrexate use were identified as covariates for apparent clearance, while body weight and sex were covariates for apparent distribution volume in the final model. Body weight had the greatest effect on the PK of ozoralizumab, while the other covariates had minor effects. When administered at 30 mg every 4 weeks, the predicted steady‐state plasma trough concentration in a patient weighing 83.2 kg exceeded the trough concentration required to maintain efficacy of ozoralizumab, and the estimated exposure in a patient weighing 42.5 kg did not exceed the mean exposure at 80 mg, a well‐tolerated dose, throughout 52 weeks. We developed a population PK model that adequately described the ozoralizumab PK in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and none of the evaluated covariates showed clinically relevant effects on the PK of ozoralizumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) are widely used in patients with RA, but response to bDMARDs is heterogeneous. The objective of this work was to identify pretreatment proteomic biomarkers associated with RA clinical outcome measures in patients starting bDMARDs. Methods Sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra mass spectrometry (SWATH-MS) was used to generate spectral maps of sera from patients with RA before and after 3 months of treatment with the bDMARD etanercept. Protein levels were regressed against RA clinical outcome measures, i.e. 28-joint DAS (DAS28) and its subcomponents and DAS28 <2.6 (i.e. remission). The proteins with the strongest evidence for association were analysed in an independent, replication dataset. Finally, subnetwork analysis was carried out using the Disease Module Detection algorithm and biological plausibility of identified proteins was assessed by enrichment analysis. Results A total of 180 patients with RA were included in the discovery dataset and 58 in the validation dataset from a UK-based prospective multicentre study. Ten individual proteins were found to be significantly associated with RA clinical outcome measures. The association of T-complex protein 1 subunit η with DAS28 remission was replicated in an independent cohort. Subnetwork analysis of the 10 proteins from the regression analysis identified the ontological theme, with the strongest associations being with acute phase and acute inflammatory responses. Conclusion This longitudinal study of 180 patients with RA commencing etanercept has identified several putative protein biomarkers of treatment response to this drug, one of which was replicated in an independent cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Intra-abdominal abscesses complicating Crohn's disease [CD] are a challenging situation. Their management, during hospitalisation and after resolution, is still unclear. Methods Adult patients with CD complicated with intra-abdominal abscess. who required hospitalisation, were included from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry from GETECCU. Initial strategy effectiveness and safety to resolve abscess was assessed. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate recurrence risk. Predictive factors associated with resolution were evaluated by multivariate regression and predictive factors associated with recurrence were assessed by Cox regression. Results In all, 520 patients from 37 Spanish hospitals were included; 322 [63%] were initially treated with antibiotics alone, 128 [26%] with percutaneous drainage, and 54 [17%] with surgical drainage. The size of the abscess was critical to the effectiveness of each treatment. In abscesses < 30 mm, the antibiotic was as effective as percutaneous or surgical drainage. However, in larger abscesses, percutaneous or surgical drainage was superior. In abscesses > 50 mm, surgery was superior to percutaneous drainage, although it was associated with a higher complication rate. After abscess resolution, luminal resection was associated with a lower 1-year abscess recurrence risk [HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.76]. However, those patients who initiated anti-TNF therapy had a similar recurrence risk whether luminal resection had been performed. Conclusions Small abscesses [<30mm] can be managed with antibiotics alone; larger ones require drainage. Percutaneous drainage will be effective and safer than surgery in many cases. After discharge, anti-TNF therapy reduces abscess recurrence risk in a similar way to bowel resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims We sought to determine whether six commonly used immunosuppressive regimens were associated with lower antibody responses after seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. Methods We conducted a prospective study including 213 IBD patients and 53 healthy controls: 165 who had received seasonal influenza vaccine and 101 who had not. IBD medications included infliximab, thiopurines, infliximab and thiopurine combination therapy, ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib. The primary outcome was antibody responses against influenza/A H3N2 and A/H1N1, compared to controls, adjusting for age, prior vaccination, and interval between vaccination and sampling. Results Lower antibody responses against influenza A/H3N2 were observed in patients on infliximab (geometric mean ratio 0.35 [95% confidence interval 0.20–0.60], p  = 0.0002), combination of infliximab and thiopurine therapy (0.46 [0.27–0.79], p  = 0.0050), and tofacitinib (0.28 [0.14–0.57], p  = 0.0005) compared to controls. Lower antibody responses against A/H1N1 were observed in patients on infliximab (0.29 [0.15–0.56], p  = 0.0003), combination of infliximab and thiopurine therapy (0.34 [0.17–0.66], p  = 0.0016), thiopurine monotherapy (0.46 [0.24–0.87], p  = 0.017), and tofacitinib (0.23 [0.10–0.56], p  = 0.0013). Ustekinumab and vedolizumab were not associated with reduced antibody responses against A/H3N2 or A/H1N1. Vaccination in the previous year was associated with higher antibody responses to A/H3N2. Vaccine-induced anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentration weakly correlated with antibodies against H3N2 [ r  = 0.27; p  = 0.0004] and H1N1 [ r  = 0.33; p  < 0.0001]. Conclusions Vaccination in both the 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 seasons was associated with significantly higher antibody responses to influenza/A than no vaccination or vaccination in 2021–2022 alone. Infliximab and tofacitinib are associated with lower binding antibody responses to influenza/A, similar to COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Biologic therapy is an effective treatment for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. However due to cost and safety concerns, dose de-escalation strategies after achieving remission have been suggested. Aim To critically review available data on dose de-escalation of biologics [or other advanced therapies] in IBD. We will focus on studies evaluating de-escalation to standard dosing in patients initially optimised, and also on studies assessing de-escalation from standard dosing. Methods A systematic bibliographic search was performed. Results The mean frequency of de-escalation after previous dose intensification [12 studies, 1,474 patients] was 34%. The corresponding frequency of de-escalation from standard dosing [five studies, 3,842 patients] was 4.2%. The relapse rate of IBD following anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] de-escalation to standard dosing in patients initially dose-escalated [10 studies, 301 patients] was 30%. The corresponding relapse rate following anti-TNF de-escalation from standard dosing [nine studies, 494 patients] was 38%. The risk of relapse was lower for patients in clinical, biologic, and endoscopic/radiological remission at the time of de-escalation. A role of anti-TNF therapeutic drug monitoring in the decision to dose de-escalate has been demonstrated. In patients relapsing after de-escalation, re-escalation is generally effective. De-escalation is not consistently associated with a better safety profile. The cost-effectiveness of the de-escalation strategy remains uncertain. Finally, there is not enough evidence to recommend dose de-escalation of biologics different from anti-TNFs or small molecules. Conclusions Any consideration for de-escalation of biologic therapy in IBD must be tailored, taking into account the risks and consequences of a flare and patients' preferences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 20-year-old man was presented with ulcerative gastritis and duodenitis complicated by pyloric stenosis. Helicobacter pylori infection was excluded, and the lesions did not respond to treatment with proton pump inhibitors. No other parts of the intestinal tract showed signs of inflammation. Histopathological review showed signs of chronic inflammation with granuloma formation. A tentative diagnosis of isolated upper gastrointestinal (UGI) Crohn’s disease was performed. However, additional work-up revealed significantly positive IgG4 staining as well as elevated IgG4 serum levels. Since granulomatous disease is unlikely in IgG4-related disease, an eventual diagnosis of overlapping IgG4-related disease and Crohn’s disease (CD) was performed. Treatment with systemic steroids and anti-TNF in combination with azathioprine led to rapid symptomatic improvement. In this article, we review the available literature on IgG4-related gastroduodenitis, granulomatous gastritis, and upper GI CD. We suggest the possibility that IgG4-infiltration may be a marker of severely active inflammatory bowel disease rather than a separate disease entity.

Abstract Introduction Short-term placebo (PBO)- or active-controlled clinical studies have demonstrated that etanercept (ETN) is effective and well tolerated in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) with long-term efficacy and safety continuing for up to 7 years after treatment start. Short-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown the efficacy of ETN after 12–24 weeks, with statistically significant improvements as early as week 2. This post hoc analysis investigated the timeframe (i.e., temporal responses) in which patients with r-axSpA achieved their first clinical response with ETN and how patients responded over a longer period according to different temporal responses in index studies. Methods Data were analyzed from three phase 3/4 PBO- or sulfasalazine-controlled RCTs of ETN for the treatment of r-axSpA (index studies). Long-term open-label extension (OLE) studies assessed how patients responded over a longer period according to different temporal responses (“Early,” “Intermediate,” “Late,” or “Non-response”) in their corresponding index studies. Results Within each index study, patient responses differed significantly between ETN and control arms for achievement of Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) 20 and other measures of treatment response. In general, the proportion of responders in the OLE studies was high for those with “Early” and “Intermediate” responses as defined in the index studies. Despite patients being considered non-responders in the index studies, a large proportion achieved response on continued treatment in the OLE studies over the longer term, including through 48 weeks. Conclusions Response in the index studies was maintained in the long term, and continued treatment was warranted in a large proportion of patients despite initial non-response. Absence of an early response in index studies did not predict non-response over the long term, and early response to treatment was not always a predictor for later response. Trial Registration NCT00421915; NCT00247962; NCT00356356; NCT00421980; NCT00410046.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of heterogeneous chronic inflammatory diseases of the gut presenting with intestinal and extraintestinal manifestations. Most cases fit in predominantly two types, namely, ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. The incidence of IBD has been increasing steadily in the past three decades. Focused research has resulted in many therapeutic options. Biologics (derived from humans or animals) and small molecules have emerged as the cornerstone in the management of IBD and have become widely available. Currently, monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor-alpha (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, and golimumab), integrins (vedolizumab and natalizumab), and interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 antagonists (ustekinumab), along with small molecules (tofacitinib), are approved for use. This article summarizes various aspects of these drugs, like clinical pharmacology, indications for use in IBD, safety in pregnancy and lactation, and the adverse effects profile based on the studies leading to their approval. This review also focuses on the recent advances and future perspectives specific to biologics in IBD.

Abstract Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic gastrointestinal condition characterized by severe gut inflammation, commonly presenting as Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis or categorized as IBD- unclassified. While various treatments have demonstrated efficacy in adult IBD patients, the advent of anti-TNF therapies has significantly revolutionized treatment outcomes and clinical management. These therapies have played a pivotal role in achieving clinical and endoscopic remission, promoting mucosal healing, averting disease progression, and diminishing the necessity for surgery. Nevertheless, not all patients exhibit positive responses to these therapies, and some may experience a loss of responsiveness over time. This review aims to present a comprehensive examination of predictive biomarkers for monitoring the therapeutic response to anti-TNF therapy in IBD patients. It will explore their limitations and clinical utilities, paving the way for a more personalized and effective therapeutic approach.

Background: Psoriasis is a relatively common inflammatory disease globally with systemic implications and the treatment of psoriasis has advanced rapidly in recent years. However, current treatments, especially anti tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatments, can lead to tuberculosis. Objectives: This study's objective was to analyze tuberculosis and psoriasis-related literature that was published between 1970 and 2021 by using scientometric techniques. Methods: In this bibliometric analysis study, the Web of Science database was used to find the articles on psoriasis and tuberculosis that were published between 1970 and 2021. The VOSviewer software program was used to generate visualization knowledge maps including co-citation, co-authorship, co-occurrence, and keyword analysis. Results: A total of 127 documents in the field of psoriasis and tuberculosis were indexed in the Web of Science database. The first reports were in 1971, but until 2004 there was no other publications. Since 2010 the number of publications started to increase. The most of the publications were articles (49.606%) and 91.339% of them were published in Science Citation Index Expanded indexed journals. 576 authors contributed to psoriasis and tuberculosis literature from 36 countries. The United States (n=26), Italy (n=21), Spain (n=12) were the first 3 countries in the number of publications. The most of the articles were from Dermatology (n=93, 73%) and Rheumatology (n=11, 9%) research areas. Conclusion: As can be understood from this current study on psoriasis and tuberculosis, it has become more popular, especially with anti-TNF treatments. This study recommends focusing more on tuberculosis, especially in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis patients receiving anti-TNF therapy.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of heterogeneous chronic inflammatory diseases of the gut presenting with intestinal and extraintestinal manifestations. Most cases fit in predominantly two types, namely, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. The incidence of IBD has been increasing steadily in the past three decades. Focused research has resulted in many therapeutic options. Biologics (derived from humans or animals) and small molecules have emerged as the cornerstone in the management of IBD and have become widely available. Currently, monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor-alpha (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, and golimumab), integrins (vedolizumab and natalizumab), and interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 antagonists (ustekinumab), along with small molecules (tofacitinib), are approved for use. This article summarizes various aspects of these drugs, like clinical pharmacology, indications for use in IBD, safety in pregnancy and lactation, and the adverse effects profile based on the studies leading to their approval. This review also focuses on the recent advances and future perspectives specific to biologics in IBD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic, recurrent, inflammatory skin disease characterized by subcutaneous nodules, abscesses, fistula, and hypertrophic scars in intertriginous areas, predominates in females, between 20 and 40 years old. Etiology is unknown, but multiple pathogenic mechanisms have been described, such as obesity, smoking, hormones, local friction, and an autoimmune/autoinflammatory component involving multiple cells and cytokines. It is frequently associated with autoimmune diseases, mainly inflammatory bowel disease and spondylarthritis. The association with systemic lupus erythematosus is rare. Surgical excision, topical and systemic antimicrobials, intralesional and systemic steroids, and recently biological therapies, mainly anti-TNF, have been prescribed. About rituximab, there is only one case report, in which it was administered for the management of kidney transplant rejection, with a good response of the skin disease. CLINICAL CASE: A 31-year-old female patient, with systemic lupus erythematosus with lupus nephritis of aggressive behavior and manifestations compatible with hidradenitis suppurativa. After the failure of treatment with mycophenolic acid, rituximab was given, presenting an excellent response. CONCLUSIONS: The association between hidradenitis suppurativa and systemic lupus erythematosus is rare but must be taken into account. Rituximab could be considered a therapeutic option in selected patients. The usefulness of rituximab in patients with isolated hidradenitis suppurativa is unknown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The treatment of Behçet's disease has improved significantly with the introduction of biologic therapies. However, there is still a need for more information about their use. This study aimed to evaluate the indications, response, and side effects of biologic agents in patients with refractory or severe Behçet's disease in the south of Iran, their follow-up and reasons for changing the biologics. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 44 patients aged 16-65 years who were prescribed biologic agents for at least 6 months. The clinical history, partial and complete remission at 6 and 12 months, occurrence of side effects, and need for switching to a second or third biologic agent were recorded. Results: The most common indications for starting biologic agents were ophthalmic (68.2%), parenchymal brain involvement (15.9%), and arthritis (11.4%). Improvement was observed in various manifestations of Behçet's disease, with complete remission in 86, 51.6, 92.8, 66.7, 42.9, 33.3, and 80.0% of oral aphthous lesions, ophthalmic activity, genital aphthous lesions, skin activity, arthritis, brain parenchymal lesions, and vascular activity, respectively, 6 months after starting biologic agents. These rates were unchanged or increased at the 12-month follow-up. In 25.0% of patients, a switch to a second biologic agent was necessary due to severe disease, side effects, or refractory disease. Side effects occurred in 16.3% and 33.3% of patients on the first and second biologic agents, respectively. The majority of side effects were not serious. Conclusions: We found a promising improvement at 6-month and 12-month follow-ups with various biologic agents in treating Behçet's disease with an acceptable safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims Anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] therapy is widely used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, yet many patients are primary non-responders, failing to respond to induction therapy. We aimed to identify blood gene expression differences between primary responders and primary non-responders to anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies [infliximab and adalimumab], and to predict response status from blood gene expression and clinical data. Methods The Personalised Anti-TNF Therapy in Crohn's Disease [PANTS] study is a UK-wide prospective observational cohort study of anti-TNF therapy outcome in anti-TNF-naive Crohn's disease patients [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03088449]. Blood gene expression in 324 unique patients was measured by RNA-sequencing at baseline [week 0], and at weeks 14, 30, and 54 after treatment initiation [total sample size = 814]. Results After adjusting for clinical covariates and estimated blood cell composition, baseline expression of major histocompatibility complex, antigen presentation, myeloid cell enriched receptor, and other innate immune gene modules was significantly higher in anti-TNF responders vs non-responders. Expression changes from baseline to week 14 were generally of consistent direction but greater magnitude [i.e. amplified] in responders, but interferon-related genes were upregulated uniquely in non-responders. Expression differences between responders and non-responders observed at week 14 were maintained at weeks 30 and 54. Prediction of response status from baseline clinical data, cell composition, and module expression was poor. Conclusions Baseline gene module expression was associated with primary response to anti-TNF therapy in PANTS patients. However, these baseline expression differences did not predict response with sufficient sensitivity for clinical use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota is considered a key contributor to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) etiology. Here, we investigated potential associations between microbiota composition and the outcomes to biological therapies. The study prospectively recruited 296 patients with active IBD (203 with Crohn's disease, 93 with ulcerative colitis) initiating biological therapy. Quantitative microbiome profiles of pretreatment and posttreatment fecal samples were obtained combining flow cytometry with 16S amplicon sequencing. Therapeutic response was assessed by endoscopy, patient-reported outcomes, and changes in fecal calprotectin. The effect of therapy on microbiome variation was evaluated using constrained ordination methods. Prediction of therapy outcome was performed using logistic regression with 5-fold cross-validation. At baseline, 65.9% of patients carried the dysbiotic Bacteroides2 (Bact2) enterotype, with a significantly higher prevalence among patients with ileal involvement (76.8%). Microbiome variation was associated with the choice of biological therapy rather than with therapeutic outcome. Only anti–tumor necrosis factor-α treatment resulted in a microbiome shift away from Bact2, concomitant with an increase in microbial load and butyrogen abundances and a decrease in potentially opportunistic Veillonella. Remission rates for patients hosting Bact2 at baseline were significantly higher with anti–tumor necrosis factor-α than with vedolizumab (65.1% vs 35.2%). A prediction model, based on anthropometrics and clinical data, stool features (microbial load, moisture, and calprotectin), and Bact2 detection predicted treatment outcome with 73.9% accuracy for specific biological therapies. Fecal characterization based on microbial load, moisture content, calprotectin concentration, and enterotyping may aid in the therapeutic choice of biological therapy in IBD. [Display omitted] Clinical data, stool features, and detection of microbiome dysbiosis were used to generate a model that allowed prediction of anti–tumor necrosis factor-α, vedolizumab or ustekinumab treatment outcome in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases with 73.9% accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature was conducted to assess efficacy and safety of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) versus conventional management during maintenance treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNFα) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A search was conducted up to January 2022 (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library). The primary outcome was the ability to maintain clinical remission at 12 months. The certainty of evidence was determined using the GRADE approach. Nine studies were identified: one systematic review, six randomised clinical trials, and two cohort studies. No superior efficacy of proactive TDM [relative risk 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98–1.37, n=528; I2=55%] was shown. Proactive TDM could improve the durability of anti-TNFα treatment [odds ratio (OR) 0.12; 95%CI: 0.05–0.27; n=390; I2=45%), prevent acute infusion reactions (OR 0.21; 95%CI: 0.05–0.82; n=390; I2=0%), decrease adverse events (OR 0.38; 95%CI: 0.15–0.98; n=390; I2=14%), and reduce the probability of surgery, at lower economical expenditure. The analysed evidence did not confirm the superiority of proactive TDM of anti-TNFα treatment over conventional management in patients with IBD, so proactive TDM should not currently be recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A growing body of evidence underscores the beneficial impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Objectives: We surveyed clinician attitudes, perceptions and barriers related to TDM in IBD in the Middle East. Design: A 15-question survey was distributed through national gastroenterological societies in five Middle Eastern countries (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Lebanon and Egypt). Methods: Data on clinician characteristics, demographics, utilization patterns and obstacles related to the adoption of TDM with anti-TNFs were gathered. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict factors influencing the utilization of TDM. Results: Among 211 respondents (82% male), 82% were consultants, 8% were physicians with an interest in gastroenterology (GI), and 6% were GI trainees. Of these, 152 met inclusion criteria, treating >5 IBD patients per month and ⩾1 with an anti-TNF per month. TDM was used in clinical practice by 78% (95% CI: 71–85) of respondents. TDM was utilized following the loss of response (LOR) in 93%, for primary non-response (PNR) in 40% and before restarting anti-TNF therapy after a drug holiday in 33% of respondents, while 34% used TDM proactively. No specific factors were associated with the use of TDM. Barriers to TDM use included cost (85%), time lag to results (71%) and lack of insurance reimbursement (65%). Overall knowledge of TDM (70%), interpretation and actioning of results (76%) or awareness of clinical guidelines (57%) were not perceived as barriers. If barriers were removed, 95% would use TDM more frequently; 93% for LOR, 60% for PNR, 50% when restarting after a drug holiday, and 54% would use TDM proactively. Conclusion: Most gastroenterologists use TDM for LOR, with cost, time lag and insurance reimbursement being significant barriers. Addressing these barriers would increase the judicious use of reactive and proactive TDM to optimize anti-TNF therapy in IBD. Plain language summary: Attitudes, perceptions, and barriers in implementing therapeutic drug monitoring for anti-TNFs in inflammatory bowel disease: a survey from Middle East Anti-TNF therapies are perhaps the most widely used and available biological therapies for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease globally even though other agents have been licensed in recent years. The role of therapeutic drug monitoring to optimise outcomes and mitigate against immunogenicity with anti-TNF agents are now being appreciated. Our study investigates clinician attitudes, perceptions, and barriers related to therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in the context of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) through a comprehensive survey distributed from five Middle Eastern countries. Among 211 respondents (82% male), 82% were consultants, 8% physicians with an interest in gastroenterology (GI), and 6% GI trainees. TDM was utilised following loss of response (LOR) in 93%, for primary non-response (PNR) in 40%, and before restarting anti-TNF therapy after a drug holiday by 33% of respondents, while 34% used TDM proactively. No specific factors were associated with the use of TDM. Barriers to TDM use included cost (85%), time lag to result (71%), and lack of insurance reimbursement (65%). Overall knowledge of TDM (70%), interpretation and actioning of results (76%), or awareness of clinical guidelines (57%) were not perceived as barriers. If barriers were removed, 95% would use TDM more frequently; 93% for LOR, 60% for PNR, 50% when restarting after a drug holiday and 54% would use TDM proactively. Most gastroenterologists use TDM for LOR, with cost, time lag, and insurance reimbursement being significant barriers. Addressing these barriers would increase judicious use of reactive and proactive TDM to optimise anti-TNF therapy in IBD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) is generally treated with a step-up algorithm from 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) to biological agents. There is no general recommendation if or when to de-escalate or discontinue biological therapy. In this study, we performed biological therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment to endoscopic remission followed by discontinuation of therapy. This is a 13-year follow-up study performed for this treatment algorithm. Aim: This study aimed to assess whether the treatment algorithm outlined above influences the UC phenotype toward a milder form and identify potential biomarkers for altering the disease phenotype. Methods: Patients with moderate to severe UC were enrolled from 2004 to 2015 and followed up until 2023 to evaluate disease outcomes. Patients were categorized into subgroups based on the highest treatment level required to attain remission: non-biological therapy, biological therapy, or colectomy. Mucosal TNF mRNA expression levels were measured using real-time PCR. Results: Out of the 116 patients from the original cohort, 71 individuals who had previously undergone anti-TNF treatment to endoscopic remission and subsequently discontinued anti-TNF therapy were included in the present study. Disease outcomes were registered until 2023. By the end of the observation period, 62% of participants were in remission without biological treatment. Among the 71 patients, 39% never experienced a relapse, 23% relapsed but successfully attained remission with untargeted treatment, 18% relapsed and subsequently received a new sequence of biological therapy, and 20% had colectomy. Normalized mucosal TNF mRNA expression was identified as a significant predictor for clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Most UC patients transitioned to a milder disease phenotype without requiring biological therapy. Treating to normalizemucosal TNF expression emerges as a potential biomarker, predicting the downregulation of disease severity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immunogenicity against anti-TNF antibodies usually leads to loss of response. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of clinical strategies to improve clinical remission and pharmacokinetics upon detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with ADA against infliximab or adalimumab were identified through a single centre database search covering 2004-2022. Criteria for successful intervention upon ADA detection (baseline) were clinical remission after 1 year without further change in strategy. Two-hundred-and-fifty-five IBD patients (206 Crohn's disease) were identified. At baseline, median ADA level was 77 AU/ml; 50.2% of patients were in clinical remission. Implemented strategies were: (1) 81/255 (32%) conservative management, (2) 102/255 (40%) anti-TNF optimisation, (3) 72/255 (28%) switch within or out of class. Switching was the most successful strategy for clinical remission (from 19% at baseline to 69% at 1 year, p < 0.001). Patients that continued the same dose anti-TNF or discontinued biological therapy were often in clinical remission, but deteriorated significantly (−22.7%, p = 0.004). Anti-TNF dose intensification with immunomodulator optimisation was the fastest (median 3.0 months, p = 0.009) and most effective (65% ADA suppression, p < 0.001) strategy to suppress ADA compared to solely anti-TNF or immunomodulator optimisation. Switching therapy, within or out of class, is the most successful strategy to regain and maintain clinical remission upon immunogenicity. When switching to another anti-TNF, concomitant immunomodulatory therapy should be started or continued to prevent repeated immunogenic loss of response. Anti-TNF dose escalation with concomitant immunomodulator optimisation is the fastest and most effective strategy to suppress ADA. Immunogenicity against anti-TNF antibodies is associated with loss of response in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases and remains a clinical challenge. We investigated potential therapeutic strategies in a retrospective patient cohort focusing on clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Psoriasis is a relatively common inflammatory disease globally with systemic implications and the treatment of psoriasis has advanced rapidly in recent years. However, current treatments, especially anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatments, can lead to tuberculosis. Objectives: This study's objective was to analyze tuberculosis and psoriasis-related literature that was published between 1970 and 2021 by using scientometric techniques. Methods: In this bibliometric analysis study, the Web of Science database was used to find the articles on psoriasis and tuberculosis that were published between 1970 and 2021. The VOSviewer software program was used to generate visualization knowledge maps including co-citation, coauthorship, co-occurrence and keyword analysis. Results: A total of 127 documents in the field of psoriasis and tuberculosis were indexed in the Web of Science database. The first reports were in 1971, but until 2004 there was no other publications. Since 2010 the number of publications has begun to increase. While most of the publications were articles (49.606%), 91.339% of them were published in Science Citation Index Expanded journals. 576 authors contributed to psoriasis and tuberculosis literature from 36 countries. The United States (n=26), Italy (n=21), Spain (n=12) were the first 3 countries in the number of publications. Most of the articles were from Dermatology (n=93, 73%) and Rheumatology (n=11, 9%) research areas. Conclusion: As can be understood from this current study on psoriasis and tuberculosis, it has become more popular, especially with anti-TNF treatments. This study recommends focusing more on tuberculosis, especially in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis patients receiving anti-TNF therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biological therapies may act as immunogenic triggers leading to the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). Population pharmacokinetic (PK) models can be used to characterize the relationship between ADA and drug disposition but often rely on the ADA bioassay results, which may not be sufficiently sensitive to inform on this characterization. In this work, a methodology that could help to further elucidate the underlying ADA production and impact on the drug disposition was explored. A mixed hidden-Markov model (MHMM) was developed to characterize the underlying (hidden) formation of ADA against the biologic, using certolizumab pegol (CZP), as a test drug. CZP is a PEGylated Fc free TNF-inhibitor used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic inflammatory diseases. The bivariate MHMM used information from plasma drug concentrations and ADA measurements, from six clinical studies (n = 845), that were correlated through a bivariate Gaussian function to infer about two hidden states; production and no-production of ADA influencing PK. Estimation of inter-individual variability was not supported in this case. Parameters associated with the observed part of the model were reasonably well estimated while parameters associated with the hidden part were less precise. Individual state sequences obtained using a Viterbi algorithm suggested that the model was able to determine the start of ADA production for each individual, being a more assay-independent methodology than traditional population PK. The model serves as a basis for identification of covariates influencing the ADA formation, and thus has the potential to identify aspects that minimize its impact on PK and/or efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SB5 is an approved biosimilar of adalimumab, a recombinant monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibody. The approval of SB5 was based on the comparison with reference adalimumab in analytical studies, pharmacokinetic (PK) and immunogenicity assessments, and randomized controlled trials. Efficacy data was primarily obtained in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and extended to include additional indications such as psoriasis, Crohn's disease, or ulcerative colitis by extrapolation. Following its approval, additional post-marketing data have been collected comparing SB5 with reference adalimumab. This review summarizes the clinical data on SB5 from randomized controlled trials and provides a comprehensive overview of the available post-approval data. In "real-world" settings, SB5 was as effective as its reference product across different indications and countries, treatment persistence was well maintained throughout studies, and no new safety concerns were identified. In both controlled and "real-world" settings, switching from reference adalimumab to SB5 was not associated with altered efficacy or clinical complications. In post-approval studies, the quality of SB5 was consistent over time, independent of the batch and process changes, and the SB5 autoinjector was preferred over other autoinjectors by both healthcare professionals and patients. Taken together, these data support the use of SB5 whenever reference adalimumab is appropriate and demonstrate that switching from reference adalimumab to SB5 is feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Infliximab seems to be the most efficacious of the three available anti-TNF agents for ulcerative colitis (UC) but little is known when it is used as the second anti-TNF. Objectives: To compare the clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in UC patients. Design: Retrospective observational study. Methods: Patients from the ENEIDA registry treated consecutively with infliximab and a subcutaneous anti-TNF (or vice versa), naïve to other biological agents, were identified and grouped according to the administration route of the first anti-TNF into IVi (intravenous initially) or SCi (subcutaneous initially). Results: Overall, 473 UC patients were included (330 IVi and 143 SCi). Clinical response at week 14 was 42.7% and 48.3% in the IVi and SCi groups (non-statistically significant), respectively. Clinical remission rates at week 52 were 32.8% and 31.4% in the IVi and SCi groups (nonsignificant differences), respectively. A propensity-matched score analysis showed a higher clinical response rate at week 14 in the SCi group and higher treatment persistence in the IVi group. Regarding long-term outcomes, dose escalation and discontinuation due to the primary failure of the first anti-TNF and more severe disease activity at the beginning of the second anti-TNF were inversely associated with clinical remission. Conclusion: The use of a second anti-TNF for UC seems to be reasonable in terms of efficacy, although it is particularly reduced in the case of the primary failure of the first anti-TNF. Whether the second anti-TNF is infliximab or subcutaneous does not seem to affect efficacy. Plain language summary: Clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with two consecutive anti-TNF agents. Data from the ENEIDA registry Background: Infliximab seems to be the most efficacious of the three available anti-TNF agents for ulcerative colitis (UC), but little is known when it is used as the second anti-TNF. Objectives: To compare the clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in UC patients. Design: Retrospective observational study. Methods: Patients from the ENEIDA registry treated consecutively with infliximab and a subcutaneous anti-TNF (or vice versa), naïve to other biological agents, were identified and grouped according to the administration route of the first anti-TNF into IVi (intravenous initially) or SCi (subcutaneous initially). Results: Overall, 473 UC patients were included (330 IVi, 143 SCi). Clinical response at week 14 was 42.7% and 48.3% in the IVi and SCi groups (non-statistically significant), respectively. Clinical remission rates at week 52 were 32.8% and 31.4%, in the IVi and SCi groups (nonsignificant differences), respectively. A propensity-matched score analysis showed a higher clinical response rate at week 14 in the SCi group and higher treatment persistence in the IVi group. Regarding long-term outcomes, dose escalation and discontinuation due to the primary failure of the first anti-TNF and more severe disease activity at the beginning of the second anti-TNF were inversely associated with clinical remission. Conclusion: The use of a second anti-TNF for UC seems to be reasonable in terms of efficacy, although it is particularly reduced in the case of the primary failure of the first anti-TNF. Whether the second anti-TNF is infliximab or subcutaneous does not seem to affect efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]