Search

Congenital Hemophilia A is a complex disease to treat, especially in places without access to hemophilia treatment centers (HTCs). The primary aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of a cohort of adult people with congenital hemophilia A in an HTC localized in the Bajio region of Mexico. Observational retrospective study of a cohort of 82 adult people with congenital hemophilia A treated in a tertiary-level hospital in the Bajio region of Mexico, between June 2022 and June 2023. The median age of the patients was 29.5 years, 60.9% with severe hemophilia A, 53.6% were under some factor VIII prophylaxis regimen, and 52.4% had home therapy. The median annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was one bleed/year (IQR 0–3 bleeds/year) including a median of zero joint bleeds/year (IQR 0–3 bleeds/year). The presence of high-response inhibitors was detected in 8.5%, with an overall incidence of inhibitors of 14.6% of the cohort. Univariate analysis showed that inhibitors (OR 21.10; CI 95% 1.20–370.3; P = 0.03) and clinical arthropathy (OR 6.14; CI 95% 2.13–17.68; P = 0.001) were significantly higher in severe hemophilia. Clinically significant arthropathy was found in 71.9% of patients. Ultrasonography of the target joints showed that mainly cartilage degeneration was affected. Blood transfusion-associated viral infections were detected in 10.9% of patients. In our HTC, current treatment with hemostatic agents allows adequate control of ABR with acceptable inhibitor rates. However, we still have joint damage in most patients, which is partly explained by the fact that prophylaxis was introduced only in recent years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Advances in haemophilia treatment have resulted in a near‐normal life expectancy, lower burden of bleeding and treatment, and improved quality of life in high‐income countries. Bleeding rate is approaching zero and novel parameters should be evaluated to assess the efficacy of treatment not only from the clinical point of view by using new methodologies (e.g. joint health assessment), but also from the patient's perspective (e.g. pain, quality of life, treatment satisfaction). Methods and results: This approach should be aimed at combining objective clinical methodologies and patient‐reported outcomes (PROs). However, some instruments used for assessing PROs are still suboptimal and not properly validated. Recent evidence suggests that these tools can take advantage from a more personalized designed approach and could be effectively improved and serve to facilitate the patient's self‐evaluation. For other congenital bleeding disorders (BDs), a set of patient‐relevant outcomes has been also defined that overlap substantially those of haemophilia, including bleeding, side effects and complications, and PROs, such as pain, physical functioning, impact on daily life including school and work and mental health. There is a growing focus on addressing women‐specific outcomes in BDs, reflecting an increased awareness of the unique challenges faced by women in this context. However, the development of tailored tools is imperative to further advance the progress in managing women with BDs, ensuring more accurate monitoring and personalized care. Conclusions: How incorporating these outcome measures in the process of approval of novel treatments for these disorders by regulatory authorities remains to be established. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Emicizumab is a monoclonal antibody that bridges activated factor IX (FIX) and factor X (FX) to replace the function of missing activated factor VIII (FVIII) in hemophilia A patients irrespective of FVIII inhibitor status. This study assessed the effectiveness of emicizumab in preventing bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A. This observational study included patients with moderate to severe hemophilia A who were undergoing episodic FVIII replacement therapy. The primary endpoint was the difference in annualized bleeding rates (ABR) and the secondary endpoint was the difference in Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) before and after emicizumab prophylaxis. A total of 30 male hemophilia patients were included, the mean age was 16.7 (SD: ±8.1) years, and most of them had moderate hemophilia A [63.3%]. Before prophylaxis, the median ABR was 48 (interquartile range [IQR]: 35–60), and 93.3% of patients had ABR greater than eight, whereas after prophylaxis the median ABR decreased significantly (median [IQR]: 0 [0.0–0.4], p

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Until recently, the treatment of people with hemophilia A and inhibitors (PwHAi) was based on the use of bypassing agents (BPA). However, the advent of emicizumab as prophylaxis has demonstrated promising results. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the bleeding endpoints between PwHAi on BPA and those on emicizumab prophylaxis. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review of interventions and meta-analysis conducted at the Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil. METHODS: The CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Scopus, and LILACS databases were searched on February 21, 2023. Two authors conducted the literature search, publication selection, and data extraction. The selected publications evaluated the bleeding endpoints between PwHAi on emicizumab prophylaxis and those on BPA prophylaxis. The risk of bias was evaluated according to the Joanna Briggs Institute criteria. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for treated bleeds. RESULTS: Five publications (56 PwHAi) were selected from the 543 retrieved records. Overall, bleeding endpoints were lower during emicizumab prophylaxis than during BPA prophylaxis. All the publications had at least one risk of bias. The only common parameter for the meta-analysis was the ABR for treated bleeds. During emicizumab prophylaxis, the ABR for treated bleeds was lower than during BPA prophylaxis (standard mean difference: −1.58; 95% confidence interval −2.50, −0.66, P = 0.0008; I2 = 68.4%, P = 0.0031). CONCLUSION: Emicizumab was superior to BPA in bleeding prophylaxis in PwHAi. However, both the small population size and potential risk of bias should be considered when evaluating these results. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42021278726, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=278726.

Maria Elisa Mancuso,1,2 Daniel Eriksson,3 Aletta Falk,3 Zalmai Hakimi,3 Piotr Wojciechowski,4,5 Marlena Wdowiak,4 Robert Klamroth6,7 1Center for Thrombosis and Hemorrhagic Diseases, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; 2Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; 3Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, Stockholm, Sweden; 4Creativ-Ceutical, Krakow, Poland; 5Assignity, Krakow, Poland; 6Department of Internal Medicine, Hemophilia Treatment Center, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany; 7Institute of Experimental Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Bonn, GermanyCorrespondence: Robert Klamroth, Department of Internal Medicine – Angiology and Hemostaseology, Center for Vascular Medicine, Haemophilia Treatment Center, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Landsberger Allee 49, Berlin, D-10249, Germany, Tel +49 (0)30 130 231575, Fax +49 (0)30 130 232130, Email robert.klamroth@vivantes.dePurpose: For patients with hemophilia B, extended half-life factor IX (FIX) products are available for prophylaxis and for treating bleeds. Different methods are used to extend the half-lives of recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) and nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP). This affects their biodistribution and plasma FIX levels, although differences do not always correlate with clinical outcomes. A matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of prophylaxis with rFIXFc and N9-GP was performed, based on licensed dosing in the European Union.Patients and Methods: Combined rFIXFc data from the weekly and individualized interval prophylaxis arms of the B-LONG clinical trial, and N9-GP data from the 40 IU/kg once-weekly prophylaxis arm of PARADIGM 2 were used in a MAIC. Individual patient data for rFIXFc (n=87) were matched to aggregated data for N9-GP (n=29). Estimated annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) for rFIXFc were recalculated using a Poisson regression model with adjustment for over-dispersion, and compared with ABRs reported for N9-GP, using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI).Results: There was no evidence of significant differences in estimated ABRs between prophylaxis with rFIXFc and N9-GP. Analysis of pooled rFIXFc weekly and interval-adjusted dosing compared with N9-GP 40 IU/kg once weekly produced estimated ABRs of 2.59 versus 2.51 (IRR 1.03; 95% CI 0.56– 1.89), as well as 1.34 versus 1.22 (IRR 1.10; 95% CI 0.42– 2.91) and 1.13 versus 1.29 (IRR 0.88; 95% CI 0.47– 1.63) for overall, spontaneous, and traumatic bleeding events, respectively.Conclusion: The study did not reveal any significant differences in the efficacy of rFIXFc and N9-GP prophylaxis. Given differences in trough levels (rFIXFc dosing was targeted to achieve a trough 1– 3 IU/dL above baseline versus a reported estimated N9-GP mean trough of 27.3 IU/dL), interpreting plasma FIX levels as potential surrogate efficacy markers requires consideration of compound-specific pharmacokinetic profiles.Keywords: annualized bleeding rate, factor IX deficiency, factor IX Fc fusion protein, nonacog beta pegol, plasma factor IX activity, treatment outcome

Background: Recombinant factor VIII-Fc (rFVIIIFc) became available in Taiwan in 2018. Before this date, no people with hemophilia A (PwHA) were enrolled in a clinical trial of rFVIIIFc. We investigated changes in bleeding outcomes and product utilization in PwHA switching from rFVIII to rFVIIIFc. Methods: Data were collected for Taiwanese PwHA (severe-type) who switched from rFVIII to rFVIIIFc, including annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and weekly dose consumption 12 months pre-switch and > 6 months post-switch. Results: The 51 patients were divided into 3 groups according to their pre-switch treatment: on-demand treatment, intermittent periodic prophylaxis, and regular prophylaxis. In every group, the post-switch median ABR was significantly reduced, with no significant differences between groups. Meanwhile, the post-switch median weekly dose of each group was significantly increased. In 32 patients on pre-switch prophylaxis, switching brought a further reduction in median ABR, associated with a significant increase in median weekly dose. No adverse effects or novel inhibitor development were seen. Conclusion: This is the first report from Asia on real-world experience of rFVIIIFc, showing that switching to rFVIIIFc prophylaxis led to further reduction in ABR and increase in weekly dose for all patient groups, even those on pre-switch rFVIII prophylaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

rVIII-SingleChain, a recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII), has demonstrated safety and efficacy in patients with hemophilia A in clinical trials and real-world evidence. This analysis aimed to estimate the potential budget impact of increasing the usage of rVIII-SingleChain for the prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A over 3 years in Italy. Patients with moderate and severe hemophilia A receiving prophylaxis were included in the analysis. Epidemiological data were obtained from published literature. Mean product consumption and mean annual bleeding rate for rVIII-SingleChain, rFVIIIFc, octocog alfa and BAY 81-8973 were based on pooled real-world data from Italy, Germany and US. A budget impact model has been developed in order to compare two scenarios: a base-case scenario where current rVIII-SingleChain shares are kept constant over 3 years and an alternative scenario where rVIII-SingleChain shares increase by taking from other rFVIII products. Analysis 1 was based on the current Italian list prices and Analysis 2 considered current regional acquisition prices for both scenarios. Annually, adult patients treated with rVIII-SingleChain prophylaxis are expected to consume 324,589 units per patient, resulting in annual costs of €240,196 per patient. In Analysis 1, comparing the base case (constant market share of 9% rVIII-SingleChain over time) with the alternative scenario (higher rVIII-SingleChain market share and increasing from 15% in the first year to 25% in the third year), the total expenditure for prophylaxis using rFVIII products is expected to decrease by €1.4 million in Year 1, by €3.1 million in Year 2 and by €5.4 million in Year 3. In Analysis 2 based on regional prices, the results remained consistent. This analysis suggests that increasing utilization of rVIII-SingleChain in hemophilia A patients may lead to cost savings as a result of reduced consumption with uncompromised efficacy in bleed protection. Why was the study done? Hemophilia A is a rare inherited bleeding disorder. People with severe hemophilia are more likely to bleed compared to people without hemophilia and bleeds can occur spontaneously or in response to trauma. Patients are treated with medication to reduce the chance of bleeding. However, the cost of treating patients with hemophilia can be high and place demands on the healthcare system. What did we do and find? This study looked at the cost of treating people with hemophilia in Italy and used a type of economic analysis (called budget impact modelling) to estimate the effect of increasing the use of a particular medication (rVIII-SingleChain), compared to other medications that are available. Different variations of the model were tested to compare a range of scenarios. The results of this analysis suggested that increasing the use of rVIII-SingleChain may lead to cost-savings for the Italian healthcare system, compared to using the other currently available treatments. This analysis suggests that the use of rVIII-SingleChain enables people with hemophilia A to remain protected from bleeds, whilst using less product compared to other available medications. What is the influence of this study on the wider field? This type of analysis can be useful to healthcare systems, to guide the decision-making process regarding which medications to use or when making decisions related to healthcare policy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionIn 2020, the new nationwide protocol of prophylaxis in Polish plasma-derived FVIII (pdFVIII) previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe hemophilia A (sHA) was introduced, resulting in the necessity of switching from pdFVIII to recombinant FVIII (octocog-alpha; rFVIII). The study aimed to: (1) assess the safety of switching from pdFVIII to rFVIII, (2) assess the safety and efficacy of pharmacokinetically based (PK-based) personalized prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A.Patients and methods151 children and adolescents receiving prophylaxis with a standard dose (40 U/kg 3 x weekly) of pdFVIII were included in this study. Annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and annualized joint bleeding rate (AJBR) were analyzed for all patients before enrollment. Using myPKFiT application, pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis followed by the selection of the optimal model of prophylaxis was performed in all patients. Two possible models of prophylaxis (standard-dose rFVIII versus PK-based rFVIII) were discussed, with parents leaving the choice to their decision. Parents reported all episodes of bleeds. Screening for inhibitor was performed every 3 months. ABR and AJBR were prospectively analyzed again after a minimum follow-up time of 26 weeks.Results141/151 (93.4%) patients completed the study. 34 patients decided to continue standard prophylaxis with rFVIII (Group I), whereas 107 were switched to PK-based prophylaxis (Group II). The risk of inhibitor development could be assessed in 137/151 (90.7%) patients. Only 2/137 (1.47%) patients (both on PK-based prophylaxis) developed low-titer inhibitor with its spontaneous elimination. The retrospective analysis of bleeds during the last 12 months of standard pdFVIII prophylaxis revealed that patients who decided to continue standard prophylaxis had historically lower ABR and AJBR than those who started PK-based personalized prophylaxis. After a minimum of 26 weeks, ABR and AJBR improved significantly in both groups. There was no significant difference in ABR and AJBR between Group I and Group II during the follow-up period. However, the rate of reduction of ABR and AJBR was higher in patients on PK-based personalized prophylaxis.Conclusion(1) Switching from pdFVIII to rFVIII (octocog-alpha) in PTPs with sHA is safe, (2) PK-based personalized prophylaxis may decrease ABR and AJBR in children and adolescents with sHA.

Jan Astermark,1 Piotr Wojciechowski,2 Samuel Aballéa,3 Zalmai Hakimi,4 Jameel Nazir,4 Robert Klamroth5 1Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, and Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; 2Creativ-Ceutical, Krakow, Poland; 3Creativ-Ceutical, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; 4Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, Stockholm, Sweden; 5Department of Internal Medicine, Hemophilia Treatment Centre, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, GermanyCorrespondence: Robert Klamroth Email robert.klamroth@vivantes.dePurpose: In patients with hemophilia B, treatment with extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor IX allows for longer dosing intervals while providing equal or superior bleeding protection compared with standard half-life products. This enables flexible, individualized treatment schedules, which reduce the burden of prophylaxis and improve patient outcomes. This analysis compared the efficacy of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) and recombinant factor IX albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP), two EHL therapies approved for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding in hemophilia B.Patients and Methods: Matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (MAIC) was used to adjust the between-treatment differences in baseline characteristics. Individual patient data for rFIXFc (B-LONG) were matched to aggregated data for rIX-FP (PROLONG-9FP) followed by statistical comparison for estimated annualized bleeding rate (ABR) using a Poisson regression model with adjustment for over dispersion. Data were analyzed according to treatment regimen prior to study entry: prior prophylaxis (rFIXFc, n=48; rIX-FP, n=40) or prior episodic treatment (n=43 and n=19, respectively). Relative treatment effects are presented as incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results: After adjustment for baseline characteristics, estimated ABR observed for rFIXFc and rIX-FP was not significantly different in patients on prior prophylaxis (1.87 versus 1.58; IRR 1.18, 95% CI 0.67– 2.10) or prior episodic (2.25 versus 2.22; IRR 1.01 95% CI 0.40– 2.57) regimens.Conclusion: This MAIC analysis shows that the estimated ABR for rFIXFc-treated patients from B-LONG was similar to that of rIX-FP-treated patients from PROLONG-9FP and, therefore, indicates that the two EHL therapies provide similar efficacy when used as prophylaxis for patients with hemophilia B. Trough levels differ between the two products (1– 3% [targeted] versus 20% [observed], respectively), suggesting that trough level is not a surrogate indicator when ABR is used as a criterion for clinical efficacy when comparing these FIX products in hemophilia B.Keywords: annualized bleeding rate, comparative effectiveness research, factor IX deficiency, factor IX Fc fusion protein, rIX-FP fusion protein, treatment outcome

Robert Klamroth,1 Piotr Wojciechowski,2 Samuel Aballéa,3 Françoise Diamand,4 Zalmai Hakimi,5 Jameel Nazir,5 Lydia Abad-Franch,6 Stefan Lethagen,7 Elena Santagostino,8 Michael D Tarantino9 1Department of Internal Medicine, Hemophilia Treatment Centre, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany; 2Creativ-Ceutical, Krakow, Poland; 3Creativ-Ceutical, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; 4Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France; 5Health Economics and Outcomes Research (Global), Sobi, Stockholm, Sweden; 6Global Medical Affairs Hematology, Sobi, Stockholm, Sweden; 7Medical and Clinical Sciences, Sobi, Stockholm, Sweden; 8Medical Affairs Hematology, Sobi, Stockholm, Sweden; 9The Bleeding and Clotting Disorders Institute, University of Illinois College of Medicine-Peoria, Peoria, IL, USACorrespondence: Robert KlamrothDepartment of Internal Medicine – Angiology and Hemostaseology, Center for Vascular Medicine, Hämophiliezentrum/Gerinnungssprechstunde, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Landsberger Allee 49, D, Berlin, 10249, Germany, Tel +49 (0)30 130 231575Fax +49 (0)30 130 231313Email robert.klamroth@vivantes.dePurpose: Primary prophylaxis, using factor VIII replacement, is the recognized standard of care for severe hemophilia A. Recombinant factor VIII-Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) and emicizumab, a humanized, bispecific antibody, are approved for routine prophylaxis of bleeding episodes in severe hemophilia A. These products have different mechanisms of action, methods of administration and treatment schedules. In the absence of head-to-head trials, indirect treatment comparisons can provide informative evidence on the relative efficacy of the two treatments. The aim of the study was to compare the approved dosing regimens for each product, rFVIIIFc individualized prophylaxis and emicizumab administered once every week (Q1W), every 2 weeks (Q2W) or every 4 weeks (Q4W), based on clinical trial evidence.Patients and Methods: The comparison was conducted using matching-adjusted indirect comparison since clinical evidence did not form a connected network. Individual patient data for rFVIIIFc (A-LONG) were compared with data for emicizumab (HAVEN trial program) for mean annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and proportion of patients with zero bleeds. Safety data reported across the analyzed treatment arms were tabularized but not formally compared.Results: After matching, no significant differences were observed between mean ABR for rFVIIIFc and emicizumab administered Q1W, Q2W or Q4W. The proportion of patients with zero bleeds was significantly higher with rFVIIIFc compared with emicizumab administered Q4W (51.2% versus 29.3%, respectively; odds ratio 2.53; 95% confidence interval 1.09– 5.89); no significant differences noted when rFVIIIFc was compared with emicizumab administered Q1W or Q2W. The mean number of adverse events expressed per participant was 1.9 for individualized prophylaxis with rFVIIIFc and 3.7– 4.0, 4.1 and 3.6 for emicizumab administered Q1W, Q2W or Q4W, respectively.Conclusion: This indirect treatment comparison suggests that rFVIIIFc individualized prophylaxis is more efficacious than emicizumab Q4W, and at least as effective as more frequent emicizumab regimens, for the management of hemophilia A.Keywords: annualized bleeding rate, antibodies, bispecific, comparative effectiveness research, efmoroctocog alfa, factor VIII deficiency, treatment outcome

Introduction: Given the relatively small number of patients with haemophilia A, head-to-head comparisons between recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products are difficult to conduct. This study compared the efficacy and consumption of rVIII-SingleChain (lonoctocog alfa, AFSTYLA®) with rAHF-PFM (octocog alfa, Advate®) and rFVIIIFc (efmoroctocog alfa, Elocta®), for the prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes in previously treated adolescents/adults with severe haemophilia A, through a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). Methods: A systematic literature review identified published clinical trials for rAHF-PFM and rFVIIIFc. Individual patient data for rVIII-SingleChain were used to match baseline patient characteristics to those from published trials, using an approach similar to propensity score weighting. After matching, annualized bleeding rates (ABR), percentage of patients with zero bleeds, and rFVIII consumption were compared across trial populations. Results: Published data were identified from two rAHF-PFM trials and one rFVIIIFc trial. rVIII-SingleChain had similar ABR (risk ratio [RR]: 0.74 [0.16; 3.48]; RR: 1.18 [0.85; 1.65]) and percentage of patients with zero bleeds (odds ratio [OR]: 1.34 [0.56; 3.22]; OR: 0.78 [0.47; 1.31]) versus rAHF-PFM and rFVIIIFc, respectively. Annual rVIII-SingleChain consumption was significantly lower than rAHF-PFM (mean difference: − 1507.66 IU/kg/year [− 2011.71; − 1003.61]) and equivalent to rFVIIIFc (RR: 0.96 [0.62; 1.49]). Conclusion: Although limited to published information for comparator trials, these results suggest that with an annualized rFVIII consumption comparable to rFVIIIFc, but significantly lower than rAHF-PFM, routine prophylaxis with rVIII-SingleChain is able to maintain a similar ABR and percentage of patients with zero bleeds, attesting to the long-acting nature of rVIII-SingleChain. Plain Language Summary: It is difficult to directly compare different recombinant FVIII products in head-to-head studies because there are few patients with haemophilia A. This study aimed to indirectly compare the efficacy and consumption of different recombinant FVIII products in the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia A using published clinical data. A proven method for performing indirect comparisons of products is referred to as a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Using this approach, we were able to compare rVIII-SingleChain with two other recombinant FVIII products (rAHF-PFM and rFVIIIFc). Our results suggest that annual FVIII consumption with rVIII-SingleChain is comparable to rFVIIIFc, but is significantly lower than rAHF-PFM, while maintaining a similar bleeding rate. These results highlight the long-acting nature of the product. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Katharine Batt,1 Wei Gao,2 Rajeev Ayyagari,2 Céline Deschaseaux,3 Parth B Vashi,4 Zhiwen Yao,2 Yao Wang,2 Sophia Kessabi,3 Robert Klamroth51Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Hematology/Medical Oncology, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; 2Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA; 3Global Market Access Hematology, Bayer Consumer Care AG, Basel, Switzerland; 4US Data Generation and Observational Studies, Bayer Corporation, Whippany, NJ, USA; 5Department for Internal Medicine - Vascular Medicine and Coagulation Disorders, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, GermanyBackground: BAY 94-9027 is an extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) that prevents bleeding in persons with hemophilia A at twice-weekly, 5-day, and 7-day dosing intervals. In rare diseases such as hemophilia, where small populations preclude head-to-head comparisons in randomized controlled trials, outcomes from different studies can be compared by matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparisons (MAICs) via matched summary statistics of individual patient data. This study compared MAIC-adjusted outcomes of BAY 94-9027 with other FVIII agents for prophylaxis of hemophilia.Methods: Weighted patient data from the BAY 94-9027 PROTECT VIII trial were used to compare annualized bleeding rates (ABRs), percentage of patients with zero bleeds, and factor utilization against published data on rFVIII–Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc), BAX 855, and recombinant antihemophilic factor/plasma/albumin-free method (rAHF-PFM).Results: After matching BAY 94-9027 and comparators, the mean BAY 94-9027 utilization was significantly lower than rFVIIIFc pre- and post-matching (66.2 vs 82.2 IU/kg/week; 66.5 vs 82.2 IU/kg/week; both P

Introduction: Turoctocog alfa is a recombinant, B domain‐truncated factor VIII (FVIII) approved for patients with haemophilia A. Aim: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of turoctocog alfa in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A. Methods: Guardian 4 was a multicentre, multinational, non‐randomized, open‐label phase 3 trial comprising a main and extension phase. The former concluded once ≥ 50 patients had received treatment for ≥ 50 exposure days (EDs) or developed inhibitors. Patients received turoctocog alfa intravenously for prevention and treatment of bleeds. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of FVIII inhibitors (≥0.6 Bethesda Units) reported during the first 50 EDs. Results: Of the 58 patients who completed the main phase, 25 (43.1%) patients developed inhibitors (detected within 6‐24 [mean: 14.2] EDs from treatment start). High‐risk mutations were identified in 60% of patients who developed inhibitors in the main phase and were a significant predictor of inhibitor development (P =.003). Of the 21 patients who started immune tolerance induction therapy, 85.7% completed treatment with a negative inhibitor test (note that data on the last 3 patients completing ITI are based on information collated from sites prior to the final database lock). Haemostatic response (including missing values as failure) was rated as 'excellent' or 'good' for 86.1% of bleeds occurring during prophylaxis. The estimated mean annualized bleeding rate for patients on prophylaxis was 4.26 bleeds/patient/year (95% CI: 3.34 − 5.44). Conclusions: Turoctocog alfa was effective at preventing and stopping bleeds and was well tolerated. Inhibitor development was within the expected range for this PUP population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Emicizumab is a monoclonal antibody that bridges activated factor IX (FIX) and factor X (FX) to replace the function of missing activated factor VIII (FVIII) in hemophilia A patients irrespective of FVIII inhibitor status. This study assessed the effectiveness of emicizumab in preventing bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A. This observational study included patients with moderate to severe hemophilia A who were undergoing episodic FVIII replacement therapy. The primary endpoint was the difference in annualized bleeding rates (ABR) and the secondary endpoint was the difference in Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) before and after emicizumab prophylaxis. A total of 30 male hemophilia patients were included, the mean age was 16.7 (SD: ±8.1) years, and most of them had moderate hemophilia A [63.3%]. Before prophylaxis, the median ABR was 48 (interquartile range [IQR]: 35-60), and 93.3% of patients had ABR greater than eight, whereas after prophylaxis the median ABR decreased significantly (median [IQR]: 0 [0.0-0.4], p  < 0.001), and 56.7% had zero bleeds. ABR was not significantly different in patient with and without FVIII inhibitors. The HJHS scores significantly improved after prophylaxis (10 vs. 2.5, p  < 0.001). The bleeding events were reduced significantly (23 vs. 0.0, p  < 0.001), and zero new target joints were reported after prophylaxis. Most of the patients [93.3%] did not face any serious adverse events after prophylaxis. Emicizumab prophylaxis was associated with a significantly lower rate of bleeding events among participants with hemophilia A, regardless of inhibitor status., Competing Interests: The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Turoctocog alfa is a recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) molecule, approved for treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding in patients with haemophilia A. In the guardian 1 (adolescents/adults) and guardian 3 (children) phase 3 trials, turoctocog alfa demonstrated a favourable efficacy and safety profile. Guardian 1 or 3 completers could enrol in the guardian 2 extension. Final guardian 2 results are reported here. Aim: Investigate long‐term safety and efficacy of turoctocog alfa administered for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds. Methods: In this phase 3b open‐label trial, previously treated males of all ages with severe haemophilia A received prophylaxis regimens of turoctocog alfa or on‐demand treatment of bleeds. The primary safety endpoint was frequency of FVIII inhibitor development. Efficacy endpoints included annualized bleeding rate (ABR) during prophylaxis, haemostatic response in treatment of bleeds and number of injections required to treat bleeds. Results: Overall, 213 patients were dosed with turoctocog alfa; 207 patients received prophylaxis; 19 received on‐demand treatment. No FVIII inhibitors (≥0.6 BU) were reported. For all patients on prophylaxis, overall median ABR was 1.37 bleeds/y; success rate for treatment of bleeds was 90.2%; and 88.2% of bleeds were controlled with 1‐2 injections of turoctocog alfa. For the on‐demand regimen, overall median ABR was 30.44 bleeds/y; success rate for treatment of bleeds was 96.7%; and 94.9% of bleeds were controlled with 1‐2 injections of turoctocog alfa. Conclusion: Extended use of turoctocog alfa is safe and effective for prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes in previously treated patients with haemophilia A across all ages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rurioctocog alfa pegol (BAX 855) is a novel third-generation recombinant factor VIII whose active ingredient is chemically modified with polyethylene glycol. A global multicenter phase 2/3 study of the product in 137 patients (including 11 patients from Japan) with severe hemophilia A aged 12-65 years, reported an extended half-life and a good tolerability profile, as well as a significantly lower annualized bleeding rate in the prophylactic treatment arm than in the on-demand treatment arm. Using descriptive statistics, a post hoc analysis was performed to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy profiles of the product in the Japanese subpopulation and the overall population. Extended half-life was demonstrated in the Japanese subpopulation. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] annualized bleeding rates in the prophylactic treatment arm were 3.7 (4.7) for the overall population (n = 120) and 4.0 (3.4) for the Japanese subpopulation (n = 11). The proportion of bleeds reported as excellent or good was 94.9% (149/157) in the overall population, whereas that in the Japanese subpopulation was 92.3% (12/13). No FVIII inhibition or anaphylactic reaction was reported in the Japanese subpopulation. The post hoc comparisons demonstrated similar pharmacokinetic, safety, and efficacy profiles between the overall population and the Japanese subpopulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The first recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) product was launched in China in 2007. However, until now, no study has been conducted to describe the efficacy and safety of prophylaxis with rFVIII in Chinese pediatric patients with hemophilia A (HA).Objective: To summarize the efficacy and safety data on prophylaxis with rFVIII in Chinese pediatric patients with HA.Methods: ReCARE (Retrospective study in Chinese pediatric hemophilia A patients with rFVIII contained regular prophylaxis) was a retrospective study conducted in 12 hemophilia treatment centers (HTCs) across China. The primary endpoints included reduction in annualized bleeding rate (ABR); the secondary endpoints included evaluation of joint function (number and sites of target joints) using Gilbert score and Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), quality of life (QoL) and factors affecting treatment choices. Safety assessment of rFVIII was also conducted.Results: We analyzed a total of 183 male pediatric patients (mean age, 7.1 ± 4.23 years) who received prophylaxis between 1 November 2007 and 31 May 2013. Compared with baseline, prophylaxis with rFVIII significantly reduced overall annualized joint bleed rate (AJBR) (p < .001) and ABR (p < .001). Inhibitor formation was reported in 5 (2.7%) patients and hemarthrosis was reported in 1 patient. The mean number of target joints was positively related to age (p < .001) and weight (p = .003) at baseline. Responses from survey questionnaires reported that effective bleeding control, joint protection, improvement in quality of life, favorable medical insurance policies, and economic capability were reasons for choosing prophylaxis.Conclusion: Prophylaxis with rFVIII reduced bleeding and number of target joints, even with a low-dose regimen, in Chinese pediatric patients with HA. Other than the efficacy and safety, factors such as poor disease control, improved economic stability and stable financial support made prophylaxis as an attractive treatment option. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02263066. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Prophylactic clotting factor infusion regimens to prevent bleeding and joint deformity has become the standard of care in severe hemophilia A patients., Aim: To assess low-dose factor prophylaxis in our population as an alternative approach to managing severe hemophilia A., Methods: A prospective cohort study that included 68 hemophilia A patients divided into two groups, i.e., Prophylaxis and on-demand. The two groups were compared for annualized bleeding rate (ABR), hospitalization, units of factor VIII (FVIII) infused, or plasma products transfused, i.e., fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and cryoprecipitate (CP), and development of FVIII inhibitors., Results: Of the 68 patients recruited in this study, 25 (36.7%) were in the prophylaxis group, and 43(63.3%) were in the on-demand group. The on-demand group presented a higher median-IQR ABR [8(20-3) vs. 5(10-1.5), p-value 0.024], several hospitalizations (39.7% vs. 0, p-value  0.001 ), and inhibitor development (9.3% vs. 0, p-value 0.289) compared to the prophylaxis group. The prophylaxis approach demonstrated a significant negative correlation of ABR with FVIII prophylaxis (r=-0484, p=value=0.014). Moreover, no hospitalizations or inhibitor development was observed in the prophylaxis group. The estimated annual consumption of FVIII was 328 IU/kg/year in the on-demand group and 1662.6 IU/kg/year in the prophylaxis group. However, a highly significant difference in plasma product utilization was observed between the two groups, i.e., p-value <0.001 and 0.038 for FFP and CP, respectively., Conclusion: Low-dose factor prophylaxis resulted in improved outcomes compared to on-demand treatment in terms of ABR, joint bleeding, hospitalization, and the development of inhibitors. This treatment approach should be adopted as an economically feasible alternative to high-dose Prophylaxis in resource-constrained countries., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Munawar Ali et al.)

Introduction: In 2020, the new nationwide protocol of prophylaxis in Polish plasma-derived FVIII (pdFVIII) previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe hemophilia A (sHA) was introduced, resulting in the necessity of switching from pdFVIII to recombinant FVIII (octocog-alpha; rFVIII). The study aimed to: (1) assess the safety of switching from pdFVIII to rFVIII, (2) assess the safety and efficacy of pharmacokinetically based (PK-based) personalized prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A., Patients and Methods: 151 children and adolescents receiving prophylaxis with a standard dose (40 U/kg 3 x weekly) of pdFVIII were included in this study. Annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and annualized joint bleeding rate (AJBR) were analyzed for all patients before enrollment. Using myPKFiT application, pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis followed by the selection of the optimal model of prophylaxis was performed in all patients. Two possible models of prophylaxis (standard-dose rFVIII versus PK-based rFVIII) were discussed, with parents leaving the choice to their decision. Parents reported all episodes of bleeds. Screening for inhibitor was performed every 3 months. ABR and AJBR were prospectively analyzed again after a minimum follow-up time of 26 weeks., Results: 141/151 (93.4%) patients completed the study. 34 patients decided to continue standard prophylaxis with rFVIII (Group I), whereas 107 were switched to PK-based prophylaxis (Group II). The risk of inhibitor development could be assessed in 137/151 (90.7%) patients. Only 2/137 (1.47%) patients (both on PK-based prophylaxis) developed low-titer inhibitor with its spontaneous elimination. The retrospective analysis of bleeds during the last 12 months of standard pdFVIII prophylaxis revealed that patients who decided to continue standard prophylaxis had historically lower ABR and AJBR than those who started PK-based personalized prophylaxis. After a minimum of 26 weeks, ABR and AJBR improved significantly in both groups. There was no significant difference in ABR and AJBR between Group I and Group II during the follow-up period. However, the rate of reduction of ABR and AJBR was higher in patients on PK-based personalized prophylaxis., Conclusion: (1) Switching from pdFVIII to rFVIII (octocog-alpha) in PTPs with sHA is safe, (2) PK-based personalized prophylaxis may decrease ABR and AJBR in children and adolescents with sHA., Competing Interests: TU: acted as a consultant, received speaker’s fees and/or research funding from Takeda, NovoNordisk, Roche, Amgen, Phizer, CLS Behring. KP, WB, GD, EL-G, GK, MW, DP, AK, KZ: received speaker fees and reimbursement for attending symposia from Takeda. ŁD, AK, MR, IW-K: received speaker fees and reimbursement for attending symposia from Takeda, Roche, NovoNordisk. AK: received speaker fees and reimbursement for attending symposia from Takeda, Roche, NovoNordisk, CSL Behring, Octapharma, Novartis, JazzPharma, Teva Pharmaceutical. PŁ: received speaker fees and reimbursement for attending symposia from Takeda, Roche, NovoNordisk, CSL Behring, Octapharma. MN: received speaker fees and reimbursement for attending symposia from Takeda, Roche, NovoNordisk, Octapharma. IR: received speaker fees and reimbursement for attending symposia from Takeda, Roche. TS: acted as a consultant, received speaker’s fees and/or research funding from Takeda, Novartis, Sobi, Roche, Amgen, Servier, CLS Behring. DW: received speaker fees and reimbursement for attending symposia from Takeda, Roche, NovoNordisk, CSL Behring. TO: acted as a consultant, received speaker’s fees and/or research funding and reimbursement for attending symposia from Takeda, NovoNordisk, Roche, JazzPharma. HB, JR-P: stated that they had no interests which might be perceived as posing a conflict or bias., (© 2023 Urasiński, Paczóska, Badowska, Bobrowska, Dakowicz, Dobaczewski, Latos-Grażyńska, Karolczyk, Klukowska, Kołtan, Wojdalska, Łaguna, Niedźwiecki, Pietrys, Radoń-Proskura, Radwańska, Rurańska, Szczepański, Wasiński, Woźnica-Karczmarz, Zielezińska, Królak and Ociepa.)

Introduction : Primary prophylaxis with FVIII is the therapeutic regimen of choice in severe hemophilia A; it reduces joint bleeding and associated chronic damage and helps prevent fatal bleeds. However, the high frequency of intravenous injections is a significant challenge for the optimal implementation of prophylaxis, particularly in children and adolescents. Novel therapeutic approaches have been developed to overcome this challenge. FVIII products with an extended plasma half-life can reduce the number of intravenous injections in the frame of prophylaxis regimens and can yield higher trough plasma levels of FVIII. The goal is to avoid all spontaneous bleeding episodes (zero events). Areas covered : This article reviews the benefits offered by the currently licensed extended half-life products and examines limitations, unmet needs, and knowledge gaps. Expert opinion : FVIII replacement remains the standard of care in patients with hemophilia A; however, there have been advances in novel treatment approaches. Non-factor products such as emicizumab offer a promising alternative that warrants more real-life experience and a direct comparison with FVIII replacement.

The authors emphasize the need for a drug evaluation standard that can directly measure the effect of the applied gene therapy for hemophilia. Topics covered include blood coagulation factor VIII and factor IX activity levels, limitations of annualized bleeding rate (ABR) in prelicensure studies of new factor VIII and IX products, and proposal for gene therapy trials to utilize clotting factor activity as primary endpoint to assess efficacy than ABR.

Aims: Prophylaxis with recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) is the standard of care for severe hemophilia A in Sweden. The need for frequent injections with existing rFVIII products may, however, result in poor adherence to prophylaxis, leading to increased bleeding and long-term joint damage. Recombinant FVIIIFc (rFVIIIFc) is an extended half-life fusion protein which can offer prolonged protection and reduced dosing frequency. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-utility of prophylaxis with rFVIIIFc in severe hemophilia A from the perspective of the Swedish health system., Methods: A Markov model was built to estimate lifetime costs and benefits of prophylaxis with rFVIIIFc vs rFVIII products. Clinical outcomes were represented by annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and quality of life via disutility applied to bleeding events and injection frequency. Costs included the cost of FVIII for routine prophylaxis and bleed resolution. The pooled comparator was costed by weighting the cost of individual products by their market share., Results: In the base case, rFVIIIFc was dominant vs the pooled comparator. Savings of SEK 9.0 million per patient resulted from lower factor consumption for prophylaxis and bleed resolution. Fewer bleeds and reduced injection frequency yielded an estimated 0.59 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Results were sensitive to drug dosage and robust to variation in other parameters. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested a greater than 85% probability of rFVIIIFc being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 500,000 SEK/QALY., Limitations: Due to unavailibilty of patient-level data, treatment benefit was based on a non-adjusted indirect comparison. Dosing and treatment outcomes were assumed to persist over the model duration in the absence of long-term outcome data., Conclusion: The results suggest that rFVIIIFc may be a cost-effective option for hemophilia A prophylaxis, generating greater quality of life and reduced costs for the Swedish payer compared to more frequently administered rFVIII alternatives.