Search

Background and Objectives: Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm that overproduces platelets and is associated with life-threatening thrombosis. Medical cytoreduction either with hydroxyurea (HU) or anagrelide (AG) is widely used, but drug intolerance or resistance are major concerns. Low-dose combination of HU and AG as an alternative strategy has been explored in various studies. It showed comparable response with acceptable toxicity in second-line settings for patients who experienced side effects from prior monotherapy. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of upfront combination for ET patients. Materials and Methods: From January 2018 to June 2022, a total of 241 ET patients with intermediate to high risk were enrolled. We identified 21 patients with initial drug combinations and compared treatment outcomes and adverse events (AEs) between combination and monotherapy groups. Results: The median age was 62 years old (range, 26–87) and median platelet count was 912 × 109/L (range, 520–1720). Overall treatment response did not exhibit significant differences between the groups, although there was a trend towards a lower response rate in patients treated with AG alone at 3 months post-treatment (AG + HU, 85.7% vs. AG alone, 75.4%, p = 0.068). AEs of any grade occurred in 52.3% of the combination group, 44.3% of the HU monotherapy group, and 43.4% of the AG single group, respectively. Of note was that the HU plus AG combination group suffered a lower incidence of grade 3–4 AEs compared to the other two groups, with statistical significance (p = 0.008 for HU monotherapy vs. combination therapy and p < 0.01 for AG monotherapy vs. combination therapy). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that the upfront low-dose combination approach showed feasible clinical outcomes with significantly lower severe AEs compared to conventional monotherapy. These results may offer valuable insights to clinicians for future prospective investigations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Melanoma, the deadliest type of skin cancer, has a high propensity to metastasize to other organs, including the brain, lymph nodes, lungs, and bones. While progress has been made in managing melanoma with targeted and immune therapies, many patients do not benefit from these current treatment modalities. Tumor cell migration is the initial step for invasion and metastasis. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying metastasis is crucial for developing therapeutic strategies for metastatic diseases, including melanoma. The cell adhesion molecule L1CAM (CD171, in short L1) is upregulated in many human cancers, enhancing tumor cell migration. Earlier studies showed that the small-molecule antagonistic mimetics of L1 suppress glioblastoma cell migration in vitro. This study aims to evaluate if L1 mimetic antagonists can inhibit melanoma cell migration in vitro and in vivo. We showed that two antagonistic mimetics of L1, anagrelide and 2-hydroxy-5-fluoropyrimidine (2H5F), reduced melanoma cell migration in vitro. In in vivo allograft studies, only 2H5F-treated female mice showed a decrease in tumor volume. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anagrelide (ANA) is a platelet-specific cytoreductive agent utilized in the guideline-directed management of high-risk essential thrombocythemia. In the context of polycythemia vera (PV), ANA is occasionally employed in clinical practice, although data has not consistently demonstrated a benefit to targeting a platelet goal as a therapeutic endpoint. The aim of the current study was to delineate the patterns of ANA use in PV, and to describe outcomes and toxicities. Within a multi-center cohort of 527 patients with PV, 48 received ANA (9 excluded for absent data). 27 (69.2%) had high-risk PV, 10 (25.6%) had prior thrombosis, and none had extreme thrombocytosis, acquired von Willebrand disease, and/or documented resistance to hydroxyurea. While ANA effectively lowered median platelet count, 43.5% of patients had an unresolved thrombocytosis at time of ANA discontinuation. Treatment-emergent adverse events-including headaches, cardiac palpitations and arrhythmias, nausea, vomiting and/or diarrhea-led to ANA discontinuation in 76.9% of patients. Further, three patients experienced arterial thromboses during a median duration of 27.5 months of ANA therapy. In conclusion, this study highlights ANAs restrictive tolerability profile which, compounded by the absence of clear advantage to strict platelet control in PV, suggests the use of ANA should be limited in this setting.

Anagrelide is a medication primarily used to manage thrombocytosis, an abnormal increase in platelet levels in the blood. It is often prescribed for patients with myeloproliferative disorders, such as essential thrombocythaemia (ET). Given the heightened susceptibility to thromboembolism associated with this condition, the primary emphasis in treatment revolves around reducing the risk of thrombotic events through the administration of cytotoxic agents. While anagrelide is generally effective in reducing platelet counts, it comes with potential side effects, including an increased risk of certain thrombotic events. Anagrelide acts by inhibiting megakaryocyte maturation and platelet release, thereby reducing platelet production. However, this platelet-lowering effect may be accompanied by an increase in platelet activation and reactivity, which could contribute to a prothrombotic state. We present a case of a 60-year-old female with a history of ET, managed with anagrelide and hydroxyurea therapy, who experienced an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Pericardial effusion leading to cardiac tamponade can occur due to a multitude of etiologies, one of which is medication adverse effects. In patients with comorbid conditions, this can prove to be a challenge in its co‐management along with the primary disease. We present a rare case of anagrelide‐induced pericardial effusion that is presented with tamponade physiology in a patient with essential thrombocythemia. After cautiously weighing the risks and benefits of further invasive interventions following an unsuccessful pericardiocentesis, the decision was to stop anagrelide while managing the pericardial effusion medically. Therefore, managing pericardial effusion should be tailored to each patient individually through shared decision‐making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the discussion of first-line anagrelide treatment is ongoing, we aimed to prospectively examine the efficacy and safety of anagrelide in cytoreduction therapy-naïve high risk essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients in Korea. Seventy patients from 12 centers were treated with anagrelide monotherapy for up to 8 weeks, followed up until 24 months. At week 8, 50.0% of the patients were able to achieve platelet < 600 x 109/L, and by 12 months, 55/70 (78.6%) patients stayed on anagrelide, and 40.0% patients showed platelet normalization. 14 patients required additional hydroxyurea (HU) for cytoreduction. The median daily dose of needed HU was 500mg (range 250mg -- 1500mg). The efficacy was independent of the somatic mutation status. There were 4 thromboembolic events and 7 bleeding events during the follow-up period. The most common adverse events associated with anagrelide use were headache, followed by palpitation/chest discomfort, edema and generalized weakness/fatigue. 7 patients wished to discontinue anagrelide treatment due to adverse events (3 due to headache; 2 due to edema; 1 due to palpitation and 1 due to skin eruption). All in all, first-line anagrelide treatment showed a favorable response with tolerable safety profiles regardless of somatic mutation status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In Japan, anagrelide has been approved for use in patients with essential thrombocythemia. Here, the safety and efficacy of anagrelide was assessed in clinical practice as post-marketing surveillance. Subgroup analyses were conducted to compare patients (1) with or without a history of cytoreductive therapy (CRT), (2) <60 or ≥60 years of age, and (3) with an anagrelide starting dose of ≤0.5 mg/day or 1.0 mg/day. Methods: Data were collected for all patients who received anagrelide, with an observation period of 12 months after treatment initiation. Results: Of the 648 patients, 54.3% experienced adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The most commonly reported ADRs were headaches, palpitations, and anemia. No significant difference was observed in overall ADRs across patient subgroups. A significantly higher incidence of headaches was observed in patients < 60 years versus those ≥ 60 years (P < 0.001). The incidence of anemia and serious ADRs were significantly higher in patients ≥ 60 years, and those with a history of CRT (P < 0.05). The discontinuation rate at 6 months was significantly lower in patients started at the lower anagrelide dose (P < 0.05). Platelet counts decreased in all analyzed groups. Conclusions: This surveillance showed that anagrelide has a tolerable safety and efficacy profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients diagnosed with high-risk essential thrombocythemia (ET) have limited treatment options to reduce the risk of thrombosis and lessen the progression of the disease by targeting the molecular source. Hydroxyurea is the recommended treatment, but many patients experience resistance or intolerance. Anagrelide is an approved second-line option for ET, but concerns of a higher frequency of disease transformation may affect its role as a suitable long-term option. Interferons have been evaluated in myeloproliferative neoplasms for over 30 years, but early formulations had safety and tolerability issues. SURPASS-ET (NCT04285086) is a phase III, open-label, multicenter, global, randomized, active-controlled trial that will evaluate the safety, efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of ropeginterferon alfa-2b compared with anagrelide as second-line therapy in high-risk ET. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the discussion of first-line anagrelide treatment is ongoing, we aimed to prospectively examine the efficacy and safety of anagrelide in cytoreduction therapy-naïve high risk essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients in Korea. Seventy patients from 12 centers were treated with anagrelide monotherapy for up to 8 weeks, followed up until 24 months. At week 8, 50.0% of the patients were able to achieve platelet < 600 x 109/L, and by 12 months, 55/70 (78.6%) patients stayed on anagrelide, and 40.0% patients showed platelet normalization. 14 patients required additional hydroxyurea (HU) for cytoreduction. The median daily dose of needed HU was 500mg (range 250mg – 1500mg). The efficacy was independent of the somatic mutation status. There were 4 thromboembolic events and 7 bleeding events during the follow-up period. The most common adverse events associated with anagrelide use were headache, followed by palpitation/chest discomfort, edema and generalized weakness/fatigue. 7 patients wished to discontinue anagrelide treatment due to adverse events (3 due to headache; 2 due to edema; 1 due to palpitation and 1 due to skin eruption). All in all, first-line anagrelide treatment showed a favorable response with tolerable safety profiles regardless of somatic mutation status.

Background/Aim: This work aimed to prospectively evaluate the clinical significance of circulating microparticles (MPs) in relation to thrombotic risk factors and thrombotic complications in patients with BCR/ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Patients and Methods: In a cohort of 206 patients with MPN, MPs’ procoagulant activity was measured by the Zymuphen functional assay in 429 samples, while plateletand erythrocyte-MPs were enumerated by flow cytometry in 558 samples. Results: MPN patients had higher MP levels than the control group. The levels of MPs were higher in male patients, smokers, and those who were older than 60 years, and in the presence of JAK2V617F mutation, history of thrombosis, platelets >400×109/l, hematocrit >45%, or leukocytes >10×109/l. Cytoreductive treatment reduced MP levels, with anagrelide being associated with lower MP levels than hydroxyurea. Conclusion: The relationship with thrombotic risk factors indicates a possible role of MPs in the complex thrombotic mechanism, though cytoreductive treatment seems to affect this role through reducing MP levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A simple and selective method for liquid chromatography has been developed to determine the degradation impurities in solid oral dosage forms of Anagrelide (Antithrombocythemic agent). An excellent resolution between Anagrelide (ANG) and its related substances was achieved with Symmetry C8, 250 mm × 4.6 mm, 3.0 μm column. and mobile phase A (phosphate buffer, pH 4.1) and mobile phase B (the mixture of acetonitrile, methanol, and buffer in the ratio of 40:40:20 v/v/v). The column oven temperature was maintained at 40°C. The flow rate was fixed at 0.8 mL/min, and elution was monitored at 254 nm using a UV detector. The method was validated for precision, accuracy, specificity, linearity, and sensitivity. The validation studies demonstrated that the current HPLC method is reproducible, specific and accurate for its intended purpose. Linearity was observed for ANG, and its impurities are more than (R2 > 0.995). The limit of detection and limit of quantitation (LOQ) was found to be adequate (< 0.05 %) for the estimation of impurities. The RSD for intra- day and inter-day precision was found to be between 0.5 % to 2.5 %. The percentage of recovery was found between 95 % to 105 %. Forced degradation studies were performed on ANG under different conditions such as acidic, basic, oxidation, photostability, and thermal degradation. Based on the results, this is found to be simple, specific, precise, accurate, linear, and stability-indicating method. Hence it can be used to determine the Anagrelide-related impurities in the capsule dosage form. It is economically feasible and user-friendly method. The proposed method was successfully applied in quality control labs for stability analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a myeloproliferative disorder characterized by thrombocytosis and a propensity for both thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. ET rarely occurs simultaneously with colorectal cancer. Here, we report a case of colorectal cancer in an ET patient treated using laparoscopic ileocecal resection. Case presentation A 40-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital after presenting with liver dysfunction. She had been previously diagnosed with ET; aspirin and anagrelide had been prescribed. Subsequent examination at our hospital revealed cecal cancer. Distant metastasis was absent; laparoscopic ileocecal resection was performed. Anagrelide was discontinued only on the surgery day. She was discharged on the seventh postoperative day without thrombosis or hemorrhage. However, when capecitabine and oxaliplatin were administered as adjuvant chemotherapy with continued anagrelide administration, she experienced hepatic dysfunction and thrombocytopenia; thus, anagrelide was discontinued. Five days later, her platelet count recovered. Subsequently, anagrelide and aspirin administration was resumed, without any adjuvant chemotherapy. Her liver function normalized gradually in 4 months. One-year post operation, she is well without tumor recurrence or new metastasis. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first report of laparoscopic colectomy performed on an ET patient receiving anagrelide. Our report shows that complications such as bleeding or thrombosis can be avoided by anagrelide administration. Contrastingly, thrombocytopenia due to anagrelide intake should be considered when chemotherapy that could cause bone marrow suppression is administered.

Background and Purpose: When choosing a cytoreduction method for patients suffering from essential thrombocythemia (ET), it is important to know the safety profile of the medicine used. Few articles have been published about the effects of hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea, HU) and anagrelide (ANA) on renal function in ET patients. This study is the largest analysis of nephrotoxicity of cytoreductive drugs used in ET therapy so far, which additionally includes risk factors for the progression of kidney disease and coexisting genetic mutation. Experimental Approach: The retrospective study included 310 patients diagnosed with ET. Demographic data, comorbidities, Cr, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were all taken into account prior to diagnosis and after 6 months of HU and ANA treatment. Key Results: A statistically significant difference was found between Cr and eGFR levels at baseline and after 6 months of treatment (p < 0.001). The applied treatment (HU and ANA) had the greatest impact on kidney function. ANA significantly increased the risk of worsening renal function in contrary to hydroxycarbamide after 6 months of treatment (eGFR change: median +1 mL/min/1.73 m2 [interquartile range (IQR) (−4)–(+7)] in the HU group vss. median −13 mL/min/1.73 m2 [IQR (−18)–(−6)] in the ANA group, odds ratio [OR] 7.92 95% confidence interval [95% CI] [4.17–15.08], p < 0.001). Lowering of eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 occurred in 31 patients (31.0%) from the ANA group and 10 people (4.8%) treated with HU (p = 0.000). In 1 patient from the ANA group, >50% decrease in eGFR was observed. The chance for an increase in Cr levels was higher in people with pre-existing arterial hypertension (OR 1.92 CI = 95% [1.21–3.05], p = 0.006). Sex, type of mutation found (JAK2 V617F or CALR), and previous renal impairment did not affect renal function after 6 months of treatment. In addition, there was no difference in the efficacy of ET treatment between HU and ANA (p = 0.998). Conclusions and Implications: The observations indicate that ANA should be used in patients with ET with great caution and taking into account the risk of worsened kidney function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Essential thrombocythaemia (ET) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm. This multicentre, Phase 3b, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority study investigated the cardiac safety, efficacy and tolerability of first-line treatment with anagrelide or hydroxyurea in high-risk ET patients for up to 3 years. Eligible patients aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of high-risk ET confirmed by bone marrow biopsy within 6 months of randomisation received anagrelide (n = 75) or hydroxyurea (n = 74), administered twice daily. Treatment dose for either compound was titrated to the lowest dose needed to achieve a response. Planned primary outcome measures were change in left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline over time and platelet count at Month 6. Planned secondary outcome measures were platelet count change from baseline at Months 3 and 36; percentage of patients with complete or partial response; time to complete or partial response; number of patients with thrombohaemorrhagic events; and changes in white blood cell count or red blood cell count over time. Neither treatment altered cardiac function. There were no significant differences in adverse events between treatment groups, and no reports of malignant transformation. The incidence of disease-related thrombotic or haemorrhagic events was numerically higher in anagrelide-treated patients. Both treatments controlled platelet counts at 6 months, with the majority of patients experiencing complete or partial responses. In conclusion, these results suggest that long-term treatment with anagrelide is not associated with adverse effects on cardiac function. This is one of the few studies using left ventricular ejection fraction assessment and central biopsy reading to confirm the diagnosis of ET. Trial registration number: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00202644 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Patients with polycythemia vera (PV) have a higher mortality risk compared with the general population, primarily driven by cardiovascular disease, thrombotic events (TEs), and hematologic transformations. The goal of risk-adapted therapy in PV is prevention of TEs. Current treatment recommendations indicate that high-risk patients (aged ≥ 60 years and/or with history of TEs) should be managed with cytoreductive medications, phlebotomy, and low-dose aspirin. This noninterventional study was conducted to describe real-world cytoreductive medication treatment in adult patients with PV, stratified by risk, in the United States. Methods This retrospective analysis used claims data from the Truven Health MarketScan® database. Inclusion criteria were ≥ 2 nondiagnostic claims for PV ≥ 30 days apart, age ≥ 18 years, continuous enrollment during the preindex period (January 1 to December 31, 2012), and continuous enrollment or death during the postindex period (January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014). Assessments included patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment with cytoreductive medications. Results A total of 2856 patients were identified for this analysis, including 1823 with high-risk PV and 1033 with low-risk PV. Mean (SD) age was 62.5 (13.5) years, and 65.9% of patients were male. Preindex comorbid conditions of interest were more common in high-risk than low-risk patients, including hypertension (65.0% vs 43.1%), type 2 diabetes (21.7% vs 10.1%), and congestive heart failure (6.6% vs 0.6%). Among patients who received preindex cytoreductive therapy, the most commonly used medications in high-risk (n = 666) and low-risk (n = 160) patients were hydroxyurea (94.7 and 87.5%, respectively), anagrelide (7.4 and 11.9%), and interferon (1.7 and 4.4%). Among patients who initiated cytoreductive therapy postindex, the most commonly used medications in high-risk (n = 100) and low-risk (n = 35) patients were hydroxyurea (97.0 and 91.4%, respectively), anagrelide (4.0 and 2.9%), and interferon (2.0 and 8.6%). Overall, 42.0% of high-risk and 18.9% of low-risk patients received cytoreductive medication during the preindex or postindex periods. Conclusions Despite consistent guideline recommendations for cytoreductive therapy in patients with high-risk PV, this analysis revealed that only a minority of these patients received cytoreductive medication. A notable proportion of high-risk patients with PV would likely benefit from a revised treatment plan that aligns with current guidelines.

Introduction: Real-world data of responses, quality-of-life (QOL) changes and adverse events in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) on conventional therapy (hydroxyurea ± anagrelide), pegylated interferon alpha-2A (PEG-IFNα-2A) or ruxolitinib are limited. Methods: We prospectively studied MPN patients receiving conventional therapy, PEG-IFNα-2A or ruxolitinib. Next-generation sequencing of 69 myeloid-related genes was performed. Clinicohematologic responses, adverse events, and QOL (determined by the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score, MPN-SAF TSS) were evaluated. Results: Seventy men and fifty-five women with polycythemia vera (PV) (N = 23), essential thrombocythemia (ET) (N = 56) and myelofibrosis (MF) (N = 46) were studied for a median of 36 (range: 19–42) months. In PV, responses were comparable for different modalities. CREBBP mutations were associated with inferior responses. In ET, PEG-IFNα-2A resulted in superior clinicohematologic complete responses (CHCR) (P = 0.045). In MF, superior overall response rates (ORR) were associated with ruxolintib (P = 0.018) and JAK2V617F mutation (P = 0.04). For the whole cohort, ruxolitinib led to rapid and sustained reduction in spleen size within the first 6 months, and significant improvement of QOL as reflected by reduction in MPN-SAF TSS (P < 0.001). Adverse events of grades 1–2 were observed in 44%, 62% and 20% of patients receiving conventional therapy, PEG-IFNα-2A and ruxolitinib respectively; and of grade 3–4 in 7% and 9% of patients receiving PEG-IFNα-2A and ruxolitinib. Conclusions: Conventional therapy, PEG-IFNα-2A and ruxolitinib induced responses in all MPN subtypes. PEG-IFNα-2A led to superior CHCR in ET; whereas ruxolitinib resulted in superior ORR in MF, and significant reduction in spleen size and improvement in QOL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We report an extension study of patients with essential thrombocythaemia (ET) in the Hungarian Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (HUMYPRON) Registry, which demonstrated that over 6 years anagrelide significantly decreased the number of patients experiencing minor arterial and minor venous thrombotic events (TEs) vs hydroxyurea+aspirin. Methods: Data on patients with ET were collected through completion of a questionnaire developed according to 2008 WHO diagnostic criteria and with regard to Landolfi, Tefferi and IPSET criteria for thrombotic risk. Data were entered into the registry from 14 haematological centres. TEs, secondary malignancies, disease progression and survival were compared between patients with ET treated with anagrelide (n = 116) and with hydroxyurea+aspirin (n = 121). Results: Patients were followed for (median) 10 years. A between‐group difference in the number of patients with TEs was observed (25.9% anagrelide vs 38.0% hydroxyurea+aspirin; P =.052). Minor arterial events were more frequently reported in the hydroxyurea+aspirin group (P <.001); there were marginally more reports of major arterial events in the anagrelide group (P =.049). TE prior to diagnosis was found to significantly influence TE incidence (P >.001). Progression‐free survival (P =.004) and survival (P =.001) were significantly increased for the anagrelide group vs hydroxyurea+aspirin. Conclusions: Anagrelide reduced TEs, and increased progression‐free and overall survival vs hydroxyurea+aspirin over (median) 10 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aims: Anagrelide is a drug effective in reducing platelet counts in essential thrombocythemia (ET) and Ph1‐negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the real‐life use of anagrelide in patients with ET followed over 25 years at the Haematological Institutes belonging to "Ph1‐negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Latium Group." Patients and methods: Eligibility criteria were diagnosis of ET and treatment with anagrelide. Data were collected through an ad hoc case report form. Results: One hundred and fifty patients received anagrelide for a median time of 7.4 years (0.1‐23.2). Anagrelide was administered as first‐line therapy in 34.7% of patients, as second‐line in 52% and as third‐line in 13.3%: 85.4% responded to therapy. Sixty‐eight/136 evaluable patients reported side effects: palpitations, peripheral vasodilation, anaemia, diarrhoea and gastric distress. Fourteen thrombotic (arterial 10, venous 4) and 51 bleeding events (minor 48, major 3) occurred. Sixteen/150 (10.6%) patients developed secondary myelofibrosis and 3/150 (2%) an acute myeloid leukaemia. Conclusions: In our experience, anagrelide is an effective drug in reducing platelet levels in a high percentage of patients with ET. It is especially addressed to younger people. A careful assessment of the thrombotic risk and monitoring of cardiac function, at diagnosis and during follow‐up, is mandatory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anagrelide is widely used for cytoreductive therapy in patients with essential thrombocythemia who are at high risk for thrombosis. The recommended starting dose in the package insert of anagrelide varies by country. A high starting dose leads to an early onset of action, but causes a higher incidence of adverse events. This relationship indicates that both the onset of action and side effects of anagrelide are dose dependent. We retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of anagrelide as a first-line drug between patients with essential thrombocythemia who started at 0.5 or 1.0 mg/day. Incidence of total adverse events and anagrelide-related palpitation, discontinuation rates, and the median daily dose of anagrelide were lower in the 0.5 mg/day group than in the 1.0 mg/day group; however, comparable platelet-lowering effects were achieved in both groups. These data suggest that a low starting dose of anagrelide followed by dose escalation may result in fewer adverse events and lower discontinuation rates, while providing desirable platelet-lowering effects. Initiating anagrelide at a lower dose may be a useful approach in actual clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Herein we report the case of a girl with association of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS), essential thrombocythaemia (ET), and celiac disease (CD). To our knowledge, this is one out of eight cases in the literature of BCS complicated with CD, and the only one complicated with ET. This case is particularly significant because anagrelide therapy was started at an unusually early age. A four-year-old girl with ET treated with anagrelide was admitted to our hospital with suspicion of BCS. Ultrasound colour Doppler and computed tomography imaging revealed enlargement of the caudate lobe, splenomegaly, accessory hepatic veins, umbilical vein recanalisation, and ascites. The diagnosis of the CD was confirmed by serology (EmA IgA 1 : 800, tTG IgA > 130 U/ml). Two years later Duhring's disease was confirmed histologically with recovery after diet modification. Four years later she is still being treated with anagrelide, anticoagulant drugs and is on a well-controlled gluten-free diet. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]