Search

BACKGROUND: PF-06952229 is a selective small-molecule inhibitor of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) receptor 1. We evaluated its antitumor activity in preclinical studies and its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics in a phase I study (NCT03685591). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In vitro and in vivo preclinical studies were conducted. Patients (aged ≥18 years) received PF-06952229 monotherapy [20-500 mg, oral b.i.d., 7 days on/7 days off, 28-day cycles, Part 1A (P1A)] for advanced/metastatic solid tumors and combination therapy [250/375 mg with enzalutamide, Part 1B (P1B)] for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), adverse events (AEs), and laboratory abnormalities. Efficacy, pharmacokinetic parameters, and biomarker modulation were assessed. RESULTS: PF-06952229 showed activity in preclinical murine tumor models including pSMAD2 modulation in tumors. The study (NCT03685591) enrolled 49 patients (P1A, n = 42; P1B, n = 7). DLTs were reported in 3/35 (8.6%) P1A patients receiving PF-06952229 375 mg (anemia, intracranial tumor hemorrhage, and anemia and hypertension, all grade 3, n = 1 each). The most frequent grade 3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were alanine aminotransferase increased and anemia (9.5% each). There were no grade 4-5 TRAEs. Plasma PF-06952229 exposures were dose proportional between 80 and 375 mg. Pharmacodynamic studies confirmed target modulation of pSMAD2/3 (peripheral monocytes). One P1A patient with prostate cancer receiving PF-06952229 375 mg monotherapy achieved confirmed partial response (31-month duration of response). A total of 8 patients (P1A, n = 6; P1B, n = 2) achieved stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Antitumor activity of PF-06952229 was observed in preclinical studies. PF-06952229 was generally well tolerated with manageable toxicity; a small group of patients achieved durable responses and/or disease stabilization.

Background: Transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß1 is a pleiotropic cytokine that can promote tumor growth and suppress antitumor immune responses. Latent TGF-ß1 associates with glycoprotein-A repetition predominant (GARP) on the surface of regulatory T cells prior to its activation and release. Livmoniplimab is a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds the GARP:TGF-ß1 complex to inhibit activation and release of TGF-ß1. It is in clinical development in combination with budigalimab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 Fc-modified mAb. The first-in-human, phase 1, dose-escalation results are presented herein (ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03821935). Methods: The dose-escalation phase enrolled adult patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received escalating doses of livmoniplimab ranging from 3mg to 1500mg, once every 2 weeks (Q2W), as monotherapy or in combination with a 500mg fixed dose of budigalimab Q4W. The primary objective of the dose escalation was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives were to assess safety and pharmacokinetics (PK), and exploratory objectives included evaluating preliminary efficacy. Results: Fifty-seven patients enrolled in the dose escalation: 23 in monotherapy cohorts and 34 in combination therapy cohorts. Dose-limiting toxicities were limited, no maximum tolerated dose was reached, and the maximum administered dose of 1500mg was selected for dose expansion. The most common adverse events reported in monotherapy-treated patients were fatigue, anemia, and nausea, and those in combination therapy-treated patients were pruritus, fatigue, nausea, and anemia. Livmoniplimab exhibited dose-proportional PK, and peripheral blood biomarker data demonstrated saturation of the GARP:TGF-ß1 complex on platelets at livmoniplimab doses within the linear PK range. No objective tumor responses were observed in the monotherapy dose escalation. However, the objective response rate was 15% in the combination dose escalation, with a median response duration of 8.4 months. Conclusion: Livmoniplimab was well-tolerated as monotherapy and in combination with budigalimab in the dose-escalation phase. Encouraging preliminary efficacy was demonstrated in the combination dose escalation in heavily pretreated patients, supporting further development of this novel drug combination in patients with advanced solid tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase (PI3K) inhibitors transformed management of various malignancies. This study preclinically characterized TQ‐B3525 (dual PI3Kα/δ inhibitor) and assessed the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics in relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphoma or advanced solid tumors (STs). Methods: Oral TQ‐B3525 was given at eight dose levels on a 28‐day cycle. Primary end points were dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and safety. Results: TQ‐B3525 showed high selectivity and suppressed tumor growth. Between June 12, 2018, and November 18, 2020, 80 patients were enrolled (63 in dose‐escalation cohort; 17 in dose‐expansion cohort). Two DLTs occurred in two (two of 63, 3.2%) DLT‐evaluable patients; MTD was not identified. TQ‐B3525 at 20 mg once daily was selected as RP2D. Grade 3 or worse treatment‐related adverse events mainly included hyperglycemia (16.3%), neutrophil count decreased (15.0%), and diarrhea (10.0%). Two (2.5%) treatment‐related deaths were reported. Sixty patients with R/R lymphoma and 11 advanced STs demonstrated objective response rates of 68.3% and 9.1%, disease control rates of 91.7% and 54.6%, median progression‐free survivals of 12.1 and 1.1 months; median overall survivals were not reached. Conclusion: TQ‐B3525 exhibited rapid absorption and a nearly proportional increase in exposure. Acceptable safety and promising efficacy support further investigation of TQ‐B3525 (20 mg once daily) for R/R lymphoma. Considering the black‐box warnings associated with several phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, it remains crucial to develop novel PI3K inhibitors with reduce toxicities. This study presents the results of the preclinical and phase 1 study of TQ‐B3525, suggesting that TQ‐B3525 may be a feasible therapeutic approach in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphomas, with a comparable safety and efficacy profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Iparomlimab (QL1604) is a humanized immunoglobulin G4 mAb against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). Here, we report the preliminary efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of iparomlimab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: In this open-label, phase 1c study, patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors, either failed or had no standard therapies available, were enrolled and received intravenous iparomlimab at 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Results: Between July 20, 2020, and September 6, 2021, 71 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of iparomlimab. The ORR was 9.9% (7/71) and disease control rate was 36.6% (26/71). Median duration of response of all responders was 10.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-not estimable]. Additionally, the median time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.4–2.8), 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.4–2.7), and 9.7 months (95% CI, 7.2–15.3), respectively. A total of 52 (73.2%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (grade ≥ 3, 19.7%). The most common TRAE (≥ 10%) was anemia (18.3%). A total of 20 (28.2%) experienced immune-related adverse events (grade ≥ 3, 7.0%). TRAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug occurred in 4 (5.6%) patients, including immune-mediated myocarditis (2 patients), Guillain–Barré syndrome (1 patient), and diarrhea (1 patient). Conclusions: Iparomlimab showed preliminary clinical activity and had a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced solid tumors. These results support further investigation of iparomlimab as monotherapy or in combination therapy in advanced solid tumors. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05801094. Retrospectively registered in 2023–03–24. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This phase 1b study aimed to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of HR070803, a novel nanoliposomal formulation of irinotecan, in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with pretreated advanced solid tumors. This study consisted of dose-escalation and expansion stages. Dose escalation was performed with a traditional 3 + 3 design; patients received intravenous infusion of HR070803 from 60 to 80 mg/m2, followed by leucovorin (200 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (2000 mg/m2) every 2 weeks. In the expansion stage, patients received treatments at selected tolerable dose. Fifteen patients received treatments at 60 mg/m2 (n = 12) and 80 mg/m2 (n = 3). DLTs occurred in 2 patients at 80 mg/m2 (grade 2 neutropenia that resulted in a dose delay of ≥ 7 days, n = 1; grade 3 febrile neutropenia, n = 1). The MTD was determined to be 60 mg/m2. The most frequent HR070803related adverse events included anorexia, leukopenia, neutropenia, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea. SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, exhibited lower maximum plasma concentrations and a prolonged terminal half-life when irinotecan was administered via nanoliposome compared to conventional injection. Overall, 4 patients achieved a partial response (confirmed, n = 2), and 9 had stable disease. The MTD of HR070803 was 60 mg/m2 when infused with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. Nanoliposomal encapsulation modified the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and SN-38. HR070803 with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin demonstrated a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor efficacy in advanced solid tumors. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05086848. Retrospectively registered on Oct. 12, 2021. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This phase Ib study was performed to determine the safety of combination capecitabine with alpleisib (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit p110a blockade) and determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase ll dose (RP2D) of this combination regimen in patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy. The synergistic anti-tumor activity and pharmacokinetics (PK) were investigated. Methods: Dose escalation phases were conducted in patients with advanced solid cancers who were refractory to standard therapy regardless of PIK3CA mutation. Patients were administered orally once daily alpelisib (200mg and 300mg) and twice daily capecitabine (850mg, 1000mg, 1250mg orally, days 1-14) every 3 weeks. Standard "3 + 3" dose escalation was used to define the MTD. The effect of alpelisib on the PK of capecitabine was assessed. Results: Patients with 6 colorectal cancer (three PIK3CA mutation) and 6 breast cancer (all PIK3CA mutation) were enrolled. The first three patients in dose level 0 (alpelisib 200mg daily, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m² twice daily) had no doselimiting toxicities (DLTs). In dose level 1 (alpelisib increased to 300 mg daily, capecitabine 1,000mg twice daily), one of six patients had DLT (grade (Gr) 3 hyperglycemia). When dose level 2 (alpelisib 300mg daily, capecitabine 1,250 mg/m² twice daily) was expanded to 3 patients, no patients had DLTs. The combination of alpelisib 300mg daily and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m² twice daily was declared as the MTD/RP2D in patients with advanced solid tumors. The most common AEs were Gr 1-3 hyperglycemia (75.0%). Frequent all-grade, treatmentrelated AEs included Gr 2-3 nausea (75.0%), Gr 1-2 diarrhea (50.0%), Gr 1-2 hand-foot syndrome (41.7%), Gr 1-2 anorexia (41.7%), Gr 2 mucositis (33.3%). Antitumor activity was observed in patients with PIK3CA mutant breast cancer (3 partial response and 3 stable disease of total 6 patients). Alpelisib exposure (Cmax and AUC0-12) was unaffected by concomitant capecitabine. There were no clinically relevant drug-drug interactions observed between alpelisib and capecitabine. Conclusions: The combination of alpelisib and capecitabine is generally tolerated, without pharmacokinetic interactions, and shows antitumor activity in patients with PIK3CA mutant advanced cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Tiragolumab is an immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting the immune checkpoint T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor ITIM domains. Targeting multiple immune pathways may improve anti-tumor responses. The phase I YP42514 study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and preliminary efficacy of tiragolumab plus atezolizumab in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Adult patients from mainland China with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score 0/1, life expectancy of ≥ 12 weeks, and adequate hematologic/end organ function were eligible. Patients received tiragolumab 600 mg and atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenous every 3 weeks. Key endpoints were PK (serum concentrations of tiragolumab and atezolizumab) and safety. Results from this study were compared with the global phase I study, GO30103 (NCT02794571). Results: In this study, 20 patients received a median of five doses of tiragolumab plus atezolizumab. Median age was 57.5 years, 85.0% of patients were male and the most common tumor type was non-small cell lung cancer. Exposures in Chinese patients were comparable to the global GO30103 population: geometric mean ratio was 1.07 for Cycle 1 tiragolumab area under the concentration–time curve0–21 and 0.92 and 0.93 for Cycle 1 peak and trough atezolizumab exposure, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were consistent across the Chinese and global populations. Two patients (10.0%) in this study achieved a partial response. Conclusion: In this study, tiragolumab plus atezolizumab was tolerable and demonstrated preliminary anti-tumor activity. There were no meaningful differences in the PK or safety of tiragolumab plus atezolizumab between the Chinese and global populations. Clinical trial registration number: China Clinical Trial Registry Identifier CTR20210219/YP42514. Date of registration 16 March 2021. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundTransforming growth factor (TGF)-ß1 is a pleiotropic cytokine that can promote tumor growth and suppress antitumor immune responses. Latent TGF-ß1 associates with glycoprotein-A repetition predominant (GARP) on the surface of regulatory T cells prior to its activation and release. Livmoniplimab is a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds the GARP:TGF-ß1 complex to inhibit activation and release of TGF-ß1. It is in clinical development in combination with budigalimab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 Fc-modified mAb. The first-in-human, phase 1, dose-escalation results are presented herein (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03821935).MethodsThe dose-escalation phase enrolled adult patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received escalating doses of livmoniplimab ranging from 3mg to 1500mg, once every 2 weeks (Q2W), as monotherapy or in combination with a 500mg fixed dose of budigalimab Q4W. The primary objective of the dose escalation was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives were to assess safety and pharmacokinetics (PK), and exploratory objectives included evaluating preliminary efficacy.ResultsFifty-seven patients enrolled in the dose escalation: 23 in monotherapy cohorts and 34 in combination therapy cohorts. Dose-limiting toxicities were limited, no maximum tolerated dose was reached, and the maximum administered dose of 1500mg was selected for dose expansion. The most common adverse events reported in monotherapy-treated patients were fatigue, anemia, and nausea, and those in combination therapy-treated patients were pruritus, fatigue, nausea, and anemia. Livmoniplimab exhibited dose-proportional PK, and peripheral blood biomarker data demonstrated saturation of the GARP:TGF-ß1 complex on platelets at livmoniplimab doses within the linear PK range. No objective tumor responses were observed in the monotherapy dose escalation. However, the objective response rate was 15% in the combination dose escalation, with a median response duration of 8.4 months.ConclusionLivmoniplimab was well-tolerated as monotherapy and in combination with budigalimab in the dose-escalation phase. Encouraging preliminary efficacy was demonstrated in the combination dose escalation in heavily pretreated patients, supporting further development of this novel drug combination in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Background: Penpulimab, a new‐generation antiprogrammed cell death‐1 immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody, was engineered to optimize receptor occupancy and eliminate fragment crystallizable γ‐mediated effector function. In this multicenter, phase 1b/2, multicohort study, the objective was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of penpulimab in advanced solid tumors. Methods: Patients who had unresectable, advanced solid tumors were enrolled from six centers and received 200 mg penpulimab on day 1 every 2 weeks for up to 24 months. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version criteria 1.1. Results: Between September 2, 2019, and January 1, 2020, 65 patients were enrolled and received penpulimab. At the time of data cutoff (May 11, 2022), the median follow‐up was 12.6 months (range, 1.1–28.6 months). The ORR was 12.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5%–22.8%), with three (4.6%) complete responses and five (7.7%) partial responses. Twelve patients (18.5%) achieved stable disease, resulting in a disease control rate of 30.8% (95% CI, 19.9%–43.4%). The median duration of response was not reached (95% CI, 6.70 months to not estimable). In all cohorts, the median progression‐free survival was 1.74 months (95% CI, 1.41–2.69 months), and the median overall survival was 16.59 months (95% CI, 7.82–22.18 months). Grade 3 or greater treatment‐related adverse events and immune‐related adverse events occurred in 9.2% and 27.7% of patients, respectively. Positive antidrug antibody responses to penpulimab were observed in one patient (1.8%). Conclusions: Penpulimab showed promising antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile, offering a potential new treatment approach for solid tumors. These findings supported the evaluation of penpulimab's durable activity and safety, as monotherapy or in combination therapy, in specific malignancies. Penpulimab, as a novel antiprogrammed cell death‐1 immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody, was engineered to eliminate fragment crystallizable γ receptor binding and fragment crystallizable‐mediated effector functions. Penpulimab showed durable clinical benefits and a favorable safety profile without unexpected safety concerns in solid tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sitravatinib (MGCD516), a spectrum-selective receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting TAM (TYRO3, AXL, MERTK) and split kinase family receptors, has demonstrated preclinical anti-tumor activity and modulation of tumor microenvironment. This first-in-human phase 1/1b study included sitravatinib dose exploration and anti-tumor activity evaluation in selected patients with advanced solid tumors. Primary objectives included assessment of safety, pharmacokinetics and clinical activity of sitravatinib. Secondary objectives included identifying doses for further investigation and exploring molecular markers for patient selection. In phase 1, 32 patients received 10-200 mg, while phase 1b dose expansion comprised 161 patients (150 mg n = 99, 120 mg n = 62). Maximum tolerated dose was determined as 150 mg daily. Dose-limiting toxicity was reported in 4/28 evaluable phase 1 patients (three at 200 mg, one at 80 mg). In phase 1b, 120 mg was defined as the recommended dose due to tolerability. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were experienced by 174/193 patients (90.2%); grade ≥ 3 TRAEs in 103 patients (53.4%). Most common TRAEs were diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension and nausea; TRAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 26 patients (13.5%) and death in one patient. Sitravatinib was steadily absorbed and declined from plasma with a terminal elimination half-life of 42.1-51.5 h following oral administration. Overall objective response rate was 11.8% in phase 1b, 13.2% in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 4.2% in patients with NSCLC with prior checkpoint inhibitor experience. Sitravatinib demonstrated manageable safety and modest clinical activity in solid tumors. NCT02219711 (first posted August 14, 2014).

Background: The benefits of recombinant interleukin-12 (rIL-12) as a multifunctional cytokine and potential immunotherapy for cancer have been sought for decades based on its efficacy in multiple mouse models. Unexpected toxicity in the first phase 2 study required careful attention to revised dosing strategies. Despite some signs of efficacy since then, most rIL-12 clinical trials have encountered hurdles such as short terminal elimination half-life (T½), limited tumor microenvironment targeting, and substantial systemic toxicity. We developed a strategy to extend the rIL-12 T½ that depends on binding albumin in vivo to target tumor tissue, using single-chain rIL-12 linked to a fully human albumin binding (FHAB) domain (SON-1010). After initiating a doseescalation trial in patients with cancer (SB101), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose (SAD) phase 1 trial in healthy volunteers (SB102) was conducted. Methods: SB102 (NCT05408572) focused on safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoints. SON-1010 at 50-300 ng/kg or placebo administered subcutaneously on day 1 was studied at a ratio of 6:2, starting with two sentinels; participants were followed through day 29. Safety was reviewed after day 22, before enrolling the next cohort. A non-compartmental analysis of PK was performed and correlations with the PD results were explored, along with a comparison of the SON-1010 PK profile in SB101. Results: Participants receiving SON-1010 at 100 ng/kg or higher tolerated the injection but generally experienced more treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) than those receiving the lowest dose. All TEAEs were transient and no other dose relationship was noted. As expected with rIL-12, initial decreases in neutrophils and lymphocytes returned to baseline by days 9-11. PK analysis showed two-compartment elimination in SB102 with mean T½ of 104 h, compared with one-compartment elimination in SB101, which correlated with prolonged but controlled and dose-related increases in interferon-gamma (IFNγ). There was no evidence of cytokine release syndrome based on minimal participant symptoms and responses observed with other cytokines. Conclusion: SON-1010, a novel presentation for rIL-12, was safe and welltolerated in healthy volunteers up to 300 ng/kg. Its extended half-life leads to a prolonged but controlled IFNg response, which may be important for tumor control in patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Envafolimab, a PD-L1 inhibitor, has demonstrated potential in treating advanced malignant solid tumors (AMST). To study its' efficacy and safety in AMST, our retrospective study recruited 64 patients with various AMST, and treated with Envafolimab (400 mg every 3 weeks). We divided the patients into two cohorts: Cohort 1 (25 patients) receiving Envafolimab as first-line therapy, and Cohort 2 (39 patients) receiving it as second-line or subsequent therapy. Our analysis focused on Envafolimab's efficacy and safety. Over a median follow-up of 7.1 months, Cohort I reported a Disease Control Rate (DCR) of 72.0% and an Objective response rate (ORR) of 12.0%, while Cohort II had a DCR of 51.3% and an ORR of 5.1%. Notably, patients with more than four treatment cycles showed higher DCR and longer Progression-Free Survival (PFS) than those with fewer cycles. Adverse events were observed in 68.8% of patients, with severe events (CTCAE grade 3/4) in 14.1%. Most adverse events were mild, leading to treatment discontinuation in only 3.1% of patients, with no life-threatening events reported. In summary, Envafolimab is a safe and effective treatment for AMST, in both initial and later therapy stages, particularly with extended treatment duration, meriting further clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This open-label, two-way, crossover, phase Ib drug–drug interaction study investigated whether the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety profile of lurbinectedin (LRB) are affected by co-administration of a moderate CYP3A4 inducer (bosentan, BOS) in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. Eleven patients were randomly assigned to Sequence 1 (LRB + BOS in Cycle 1 [C1] and LRB alone in Cycle 2 [C2]) or Sequence 2 (LRB alone in C1 and LRB + BOS in C2), and finally, eight patients (four per sequence) were considered evaluable for PK assessment. LRB (3.2 mg/m2, 1 h [h], intravenous) was administered alone or combined with multiple BOS administration (125 mg/12 h oral; 5.5 days). Co-administration with BOS decreased the systemic total exposure (area under the curve, AUC) of LRB by 21% for AUC0–t and 20% for AUC0–∞ and increased clearance by 25%. Co-administration with BOS did not significantly modify the unbound plasma LRB PK parameters. BOS increased the conversion of LRB to its metabolite M1, with no changes on its metabolite M4. The LRB safety profile was consistent with the toxicities previously described for this drug. No differences in terms of toxicity were found between LRB with and without BOS. In summary, the magnitude of the observed changes precludes a clinically relevant effect of BOS co-administration on LRB exposure and its safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Shu-hui Li, Yi-Wen Li, Ying-Jue Li, Lin-Bo Liu, Qun Zhang, Dan Lu Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Dan Lu, Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13845047493, Email doctorlu1972@163.comObjective: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with anti-PD-1 inhibitors in the 2nd or later-line treatment of advanced solid tumors.Patients and Methods: A total of 63 patients with advanced solid tumors who had failed or could not endure the adverse reactions after receiving first-line or more systematic treatment in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from March 2019 to April 2023 were treated with anlotinib Hydrochloride capsule combined with anti-PD-1 inhibitors. The efficacy and adverse reactions were evaluated according to RECIST1.1 and NCICTC4.0 standards.Results: The percentage of overall response rate of 63 patients during the combination administration indicated that complete response was 1.6% (n=1), partial response was 23.8% (n=15), stable disease was 39.7% (n=25) and progressive disease was 34.9% (n=22), yielding objective response rate (ORR) of 25.4% and disease control rate (DCR) of 65.1%. Furthermore, the median PFS of 63 patients with advanced solid tumors was 7 months and the median OS was not reached, and the median follow-up time is 4.5 months. In subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in PFS between first-line, second-line, third-line and above (p=0.631); there was no significant difference in PFS between PD-1 positive patients and PD-1 negative patients (p=0.094); there was no significant difference in PFS between patients who had previously used anti-PD-1 inhibitors and patients who had not used before (p=0.204). The most common adverse reactions were hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, and fatigue, with an incidence of 28.4% (18/63), 25.6% (14/63), and 25.6% (14/63), respectively. Most of the adverse reactions were grade 1– 2, and there were no grade 4 adverse reactions.Conclusion: Anlotinib combined with anti-PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated promising efficacy and tolerable safety for patients with advanced solid tumors in the 2nd or later-line treatment.Keywords: anlotinib, anti-PD-1 inhibitor, advanced solid tumors, adverse reactions

Objective To systematically study the efficacy and safety of KRASG12C inhibitors in advanced solid tumors with KRASG12C-mutated. Methods Computer searches from PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, and CBM databases were conducted to collect clinical studies on KRASG12C inhibitors in advanced solid tumors with KRASG12C-mutated, with a search time from inception to October 12, 2022. Then, two investigators independently screened the literature, extracted information, assessed the risk of bias in included studies, and performed meta-analyses using RevMan 5.4 software. Results There were four publications included, all of which were single-arm clinical studies. The KRASG12C inhibitors that completed clinical phase Ⅰ and Ⅱ trials were sotorasib and adagrasib, with two publications each. A total of 388 and 394 patients were included in the efficacy evaluation and safety evaluation, respectively. Resultsof the Meta-analysis showed that the patients had objective response rate, overall disease control, and disease stabilization rates of 35%, 82%, and 45%, respectively. In addition, the rate of serious adverse events, general adverse events, and all adverse events in patients was 2%, 28%, and 79%, respectively. Moreover, the rate of partial remission of disease in NSCLC patients was 38%. Conclusion The KRASG12C inhibitors sotorasib and adagrasib exhibited good efficacy and high safety in advanced solid tumors.

Pemigatinib is a selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)1–3 inhibitor and has demonstrated acceptable tolerability and clinical activity in advanced solid tumors in Western population. This phase I trial evaluated pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) characteristics, preliminary safety and efficacy of pemigatinib in Chinese patients with advanced, solid tumors. Patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic solid tumors bearing FGF/FGFR1-3 alterations received oral pemigatinib at 13.5 mg once daily (QD) on a 2-weeks-on/1-week-off schedule. The primary endpoint was PK/PD characteristics; secondary endpoints were safety and efficacy. Twelve patients were enrolled (median age: 61 years, 58.3% males). PK data demonstrated pemigatinib (13.5 mg QD) was rapidly absorbed with a geometric mean elimination half-life of 11.3 h. The geometric mean values of maximum serum concentration and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state were 215.1 nmol/L and 2636.9 h·nmol/L, respectively. The mean clearance adjusted by bioavailability at steady state was low (11.8 L/h), and the apparent oral volume of distribution was moderate (170.5 L). The PD marker, serum phosphate level, increased on days 8 and 15 of cycle 1 (mean: 2.25 mg/dL, CV% [percent coefficient of variation]: 31.3%) and decreased to baseline post 1 week off. Three (25.0%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Partial response was confirmed in one patient with FGFR1-mutant esophageal carcinoma and one with FGFR2-mutant cholagiocarcinoma. Pemigatinib had similar PK/PD characteristics to Western population and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and potential anti-cancer benefit in Chinese patients with FGF/FGFR1-3 altered, advanced, solid tumor. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04258527 [prospectively registered February 6, 2020]). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: QL1604 is a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death protein 1. This first-in-human, open-label phase I study aimed to investigate the safety and tolerability and to identify the recommended doses of QL1604 for future studies. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) and preliminary antitumor activity were also assessed. Methods: Patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors who failed or had no standard therapies available were recruited. In the dose-escalation phase, patients were treated with QL1604 at 0.3 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, and 10 mg/kg intravenously once every 2 weeks (Q2W) in an accelerated titration with a traditional 3 + 3 design, followed by a dose-expansion phase at 3 mg/kg Q2W, 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (Q3W), 10 mg/kg Q2W and a fixed dose of 200 mg Q3W. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed during the first 28 days after the first dose of study drug. Adverse events (AEs) were graded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, and antitumor activity of QL1604 was evaluated by investigators on the basis of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Results: A total of 35 patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors were enrolled. DLTs were reported in one patient at the dose level of 3 mg/kg Q2W (grade 3 immune-mediated myositis and myasthenia gravis), and maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most frequent treatment-related AEs (≥10%) were fatigue (37.1%), anemia (22.9%), increased blood thyroid-stimulating hormone (17.1%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (17.1%), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (14.3%), decreased white blood cell (WBC) count (11.4%), rash (14.3%), and pruritus (14.3%). AEs leading to discontinuation of QL1604 occurred in three of the 35 patients (8.6%). Partial responses (PRs) occurred in seven patients, resulting in an objective response rate of 20.0% (7/35). Single dose of QL1604 exhibited a dose-dependent increase in the exposure ranging from 0.3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg. Mean receptor occupancy (RO) for QL1604 at the dose of 3 mg/kg (Q2W and Q3W) and 200 mg (Q3W) was greater than 80% during cycle 1 after one infusion. Conclusion: QL1604 monotherapy exhibited favorable safety, PK, and signal of antitumor activity in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors, and the results supported further clinical studies of QL1604. On the basis of the safety, PK, and RO data, the recommended dosage for further clinical trials is 3 mg/kg or a fixed dose of 200 mg given every 3 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background FIGHT‐102 was a phase 1, dose‐escalation, dose‐expansion study of pemigatinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Here, we report safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of pemigatinib from FIGHT‐102. Methods Patients (≥20 years old) self‐administered oral pemigatinib 9, 13.5, or 18 mg QD on intermittent dosing (Part 1) or 13.5 mg QD intermittent or continuous dosing (Part 2). A dosing cycle was 21 days (2 weeks on/1 week off or 21 continuous days). Primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy. Results Forty‐four patients (Part 1, n = 14; Part 2, n = 30) were enrolled; most common tumors, cholangiocarcinoma, n = 8; esophageal, n = 6; 26 patients had confirmed FGF/FGFR alterations (Part 1, n = 3; Part 2, n = 23); 70.5% had ≥3 prior systemic therapies. Maximum tolerated dose was not identified. The recommended phase 2 dosage was determined to be 13.5 mg QD. Most common treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were hyperphosphatemia (81.8%), dysgeusia (45.5%), stomatitis (43.2%), and alopecia (38.6%); most frequent Grade ≥3 TEAEs were anemia and decreased appetite (9.1% each). In Part 1, no patient achieved partial response (PR) or complete response, and 7 (50.0%) patients had stable disease (SD). In Part 2, 5 (16.7%) patients achieved PR (one each with cholangiocarcinoma, gall bladder cancer, breast cancer, urothelial tract/bladder cancer, and sweat gland carcinoma) and 6 (20%) had SD. Median duration of response was 9.56 months (95% CI: 4.17, 14.95). Conclusions Pemigatinib demonstrated manageable adverse events, consistent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics profiles, and preliminary efficacy in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

BackgroundQL1604 is a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death protein 1. This first-in-human, open-label phase I study aimed to investigate the safety and tolerability and to identify the recommended doses of QL1604 for future studies. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) and preliminary antitumor activity were also assessed.MethodsPatients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors who failed or had no standard therapies available were recruited. In the dose-escalation phase, patients were treated with QL1604 at 0.3 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, and 10 mg/kg intravenously once every 2 weeks (Q2W) in an accelerated titration with a traditional 3 + 3 design, followed by a dose-expansion phase at 3 mg/kg Q2W, 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (Q3W), 10 mg/kg Q2W and a fixed dose of 200 mg Q3W. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed during the first 28 days after the first dose of study drug. Adverse events (AEs) were graded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, and antitumor activity of QL1604 was evaluated by investigators on the basis of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.ResultsA total of 35 patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors were enrolled. DLTs were reported in one patient at the dose level of 3 mg/kg Q2W (grade 3 immune-mediated myositis and myasthenia gravis), and maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most frequent treatment-related AEs (≥10%) were fatigue (37.1%), anemia (22.9%), increased blood thyroid-stimulating hormone (17.1%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (17.1%), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (14.3%), decreased white blood cell (WBC) count (11.4%), rash (14.3%), and pruritus (14.3%). AEs leading to discontinuation of QL1604 occurred in three of the 35 patients (8.6%). Partial responses (PRs) occurred in seven patients, resulting in an objective response rate of 20.0% (7/35). Single dose of QL1604 exhibited a dose-dependent increase in the exposure ranging from 0.3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg. Mean receptor occupancy (RO) for QL1604 at the dose of 3 mg/kg (Q2W and Q3W) and 200 mg (Q3W) was greater than 80% during cycle 1 after one infusion.ConclusionQL1604 monotherapy exhibited favorable safety, PK, and signal of antitumor activity in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors, and the results supported further clinical studies of QL1604. On the basis of the safety, PK, and RO data, the recommended dosage for further clinical trials is 3 mg/kg or a fixed dose of 200 mg given every 3 weeks.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05649761?term=QL1604&draw=2&rank=1, identifier NCT05649761.

In November 2021, the National Medical Products Administration (China) approved the marketing of envafolimab injection for the treatment of advanced defective mismatch repair (dMMR)/high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) solid tumors. Envafolimab became the first domestic PD-L1 inhibitor approved in China and the first worldwide approved subcutaneously injectable PD-L1 inhibitor. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports of systematic analyses regarding the use of envafolimab in the treatment of advanced dMMR/MSI-H solid tumors. The present study was a single-arm meta-analysis performed on data systematically searched and retrieved from literature published on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infra-structure and Wan Fang databases on 1 October 2022. Quality assessment using the 20 items developed by the Canadian Institute of Health Economics. Data heterogenicity was evaluated using the I2 statistics. For datasets with I2>50%, the cumulative incidence and 95% CI for the outcomes of interests were calculated using the random effects model, whereas for I2<50% the fixed effects model was used. The current meta-analysis included four studies enrolling 181 patients with advanced dMMR/MSI-H solid tumors. The pooled objective remission rate was 29.53% (95% CI, 8.61-50.45%). The pooled disease control rate was 60.58% (95% CI, 31.79-89.38%). The pooled median progression-free survival was 4.89 months (95% CI, 1.86-7.93 months). The pooled overall survival (OS) rate was 73.38% (95% CI, 65.76-80.99%). The pooled 6-month and 12-month OS rates were 75.80% (95% CI, 57.02-94.58%) and 69.32% (95% CI, 51.92-86.72%), respectively. The combined data on the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade from all the studies was 77.19% (95% CI, 63.15-91.23%). Most of the adverse reactions were mild and the rate of 3/4 grade TEAE was 10.37% (95% CI, 6.14-14.60%). Gevokizumab was effective and safe in the treatment of patients with advanced dMMR/MSI-H solid tumors and its convenience could significantly improve patient compliance; therefore, the clinical application of envafolimab is promising. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests have been covered by public insurance in Japan for patients with advanced solid tumors who have completed or are completing standard treatments or do not have them. Therefore, genotype‐matched drug candidates are often unapproved or off‐label, and improving clinical trial access is critical, involving the appropriate timing of CGP tests. To address this issue, we analyzed the previous treatment data for 441 patients from an observational study on CGP tests discussed by the expert panel at Hokkaido University Hospital between August 2019 and May 2021. The median number of previous treatment lines was two; three or more lines accounted for 49%. Information on genotype‐matched therapies was provided to 277 (63%). Genotype‐matched clinical trials were ineligible because of an excess number of previous treatment lines or use of specific agents were found in 66 (15%) patients, with the highest proportion in breast and prostate cancers. Many patients met the exclusion criteria of one to two or more treatment lines across cancer types. In addition, previous use of specific agents was a frequent exclusion criterion for breast, prostate, colorectal, and ovarian cancers. The patients with tumor types with a low median number (two or fewer) of previous treatment lines, including most rare cancers, primary unknown cancers, and pancreatic cancers, had significantly fewer ineligible clinical trials. The earlier timing of CGP tests may improve access to genotype‐matched clinical trials, with their proportion varying by cancer type. Each relevant society needs to advocate the desirable timing of CGP testing nationwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Selinexor (KPT‐330) is a potent inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1), in turn inhibiting tumor growth. Selinexor enhances the antitumor efficacy of eribulin in triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) in vitro and in vivo. Given the unmet medical need in TNBC and sarcoma, the authors explored the safety and efficacy of this combination. Methods: The authors conducted a phase 1b trial of combined selinexor and eribulin using a 3 + 3 dose‐escalation design in patients who had advanced solid tumors and in those who had TNBC in a dose‐expansion cohort. Results: Patients with TNBC (N = 19), sarcoma (N = 9), and other cancers (N = 3) were enrolled in the dose‐escalation cohort (N = 10) and in the dose‐expansion cohort (N = 21). The median number lines of prior therapy received was four (range, from one to seven prior lines). The most common treatment‐related adverse events for selinexor were nausea (77%), leukopenia (77%), anemia (68%), neutropenia (68%), and fatigue (48%). One dose‐limiting toxicity occurred at the first dose level with prolonged grade 3 neutropenia. The recommended phase 2 dose was 80 mg of selinexor orally once per week and 1 mg/m2 eribulin on days 1 and 8 intravenously every 3 weeks. The objective response rate (ORR) was 10% in three patients. In the dose‐escalation cohort, the ORR was 10%, whereas six patients with had stable disease. In the TNBC dose‐expansion cohort (n = 18), ORR was 11%, and there were two confirmed partial responses with durations of 10.8 and 19.1 months (ongoing). Conclusions: Selinexor and eribulin had an acceptable toxicity profile and modest overall efficacy with durable responses in select patients. Plain Language Summary: Effective therapies for advanced, triple‐negative breast cancer and sarcoma represent an unmet need.Exportin 1 is associated with the transport of cancer‐related proteins.Preclinical studies have demonstrated tumor growth inhibition and enhanced tumor sensitivity in patients who receive selinexor combined with eribulin.In this phase 1b study, the authors evaluated the safety profile and clinical activity of the combination of selinexor, a potent oral inhibitor of exportin 1, and eribulin in patients with advanced cancers enriched for triple‐negative breast cancer or sarcoma.The combination was well tolerated; most adverse events were mild or moderate, reversible, and managed with dose modifications or growth factor support.The combination of selinexor and eribulin produced an antitumor response, particularly in some patients with triple‐negative breast cancer.This work lays the foundation for prospective investigations of the role of selinexor and eribulin in the treatment of triple‐negative breast cancer. Combined selinexor and eribulin was safe, with a manageable toxicity profile and modest overall clinical efficacy. Durable responses and disease control were observed in patients who had metastatic, triple‐negative breast cancer. Further study is needed to examine the determinants of response to this combination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To systematically study the efficacy and safety of KRASG12C inhibitors in advanced solid tumors with KRASG12C-mutated. Methods Computer searches from PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, and CBM databases were conducted to collect clinical studies on KRASG12C inhibitors in advanced solid tumors with KRASG12C-mutated, with a search time from inception to October 12, 2022. Then, two investigators independently screened the literature, extracted information, assessed the risk of bias in included studies, and performed meta-analyses using RevMan 5.4 software. Results There were four publications included, all of which were single-arm clinical studies. The KRASG12C inhibitors that completed clinical phase Ⅰ and Ⅱ trials were sotorasib and adagrasib, with two publications each. A total of 388 and 394 patients were included in the efficacy evaluation and safety evaluation, respectively. Results of the Meta-analysis showed that the patients had objective response rate, overall disease control, and disease stabilization rates of 35%, 82%, and 45%, respectively. In addition, the rate of serious adverse events, general adverse events, and all adverse events in patients was 2%, 28%, and 79%, respectively. Moreover, the rate of partial remission of disease in NSCLC patients was 38%. Conclusion The KRASG12C inhibitors sotorasib and adagrasib exhibited good efficacy and high safety in advanced solid tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background In this open‐label, Phase 1 study, we explore the safety and efficacy of E7389‐LF (liposomal formulation of eribulin) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods This open‐label, Phase 1 study enrolled Japanese adult patients to receive E7389‐LF for the treatment of advanced solid tumors. Treatment with E7389‐LF 2.0 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (previously determined maximum tolerated dose) was tested for the treatment of adenoid cystic carcinoma, gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, or small lung cell cancer in the expansion part of this study. Secondary endpoints included safety, objective response rate, best overall response, and progression‐free survival. Results As of October 16, 2020, 43 patients were enrolled (adenoid cystic carcinoma, n = 12; gastric cancer, n = 10; esophageal cancer, n = 11; small cell lung cancer, n = 10). Thirty‐three patients experienced a Grade ≥3 treatment‐related treatment‐emergent adverse event, most commonly neutropenia (53.5%). Additionally, the incidence of hypersensitivity did not appear to change with a reduced number of infusion steps (2 vs. 4) and patients who were administered prophylactic pegylated granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor had a noticeably lower incidence of Grade 3–4 neutropenia (although this did not have a proper control). The overall objective response rate was 11.6% (95% confidence interval: 3.9–25.1), corresponding to two partial responses in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma, two partial responses in gastric cancer, and one partial response in esophageal cancer. Median progression‐free survival was longer in the adenoid cystic carcinoma population (16.6 months) than in others. Conclusions E7389‐LF 2.0 mg/m2 every 3 weeks was well tolerated for the treatment of several different tumor types, and larger studies in these populations are warranted.

Background: In this first‐in‐human phase 1b study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02761694) of advanced solid tumors with PIK3CA/AKT/PTEN mutations, the authors investigated the safety and efficacy of the pan‐AKT inhibitor vevorisertib (MK‐4440; ARQ 751) as monotherapy or with paclitaxel or fulvestrant. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed, advanced or recurrent, PIK3CA/AKT/PTEN‐mutated solid tumors, measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1 received vevorisertib (dose range, 5–100 mg) alone or with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 or fulvestrant 500 mg. The primary end point was safety and tolerability. Secondary end points included pharmacokinetics and the objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Results: Of 78 patients enrolled, 58 received vevorisertib monotherapy, 10 received vevorisertib plus paclitaxel, and nine received vevorisertib plus fulvestrant. Dose‐limiting toxicity occurred in three patients (vevorisertib monotherapy, n = 2 [grade 3 pruritic and maculopapular rashes]; vevorisertib plus paclitaxel, n = 1 [grade 1 asthenia]). Across doses, treatment‐related AEs occurred in 46 patients (79%) with vevorisertib monotherapy, in 10 patients (100%) with vevorisertib plus paclitaxel, and in nine patients (100%) with vevorisertib plus fulvestrant; and grade 3 treatment‐related AEs occurred in 13 (22%), 7 (70%), and 3 (33%) patients, respectively. No grade 4/5 treatment‐related AEs occurred. Maximum vevorisertib concentrations were reached 1–4 hours after dosing; the elimination half‐life ranged from 8.8 to 19.3 hours. The objective response rate was 5% with vevorisertib monotherapy (three partial responses), 20% with vevorisertib plus paclitaxel (two partial responses), and 0% with vevorisertib plus fulvestrant. Conclusions: Vevorisertib alone or with paclitaxel or fulvestrant had a manageable safety profile, and vevorisertib alone or with paclitaxel had minimal to modest antitumor activity in this patient population with PIK3CA/AKT/PTEN‐mutated advanced solid tumors. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02761694. In this first‐in‐human phase 1b study, the pan‐AKT inhibitor vevorisertib as monotherapy or in combination with either paclitaxel or fulvestrant had a generally manageable safety profile in patients with PIK3CA/AKT/PTEN‐mutated advanced solid tumors. In addition, vevorisertib as monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel had minimal to modest antitumor activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The intestinal microbiome has been associated with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in humans and causally implicated in ICI responsiveness in animal models. Two recent human trials demonstrated that fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from ICI responders can rescue ICI responses in refractory melanoma, but FMT has specific limitations to scaled use. We conducted an early-phase clinical trial of a cultivated, orally delivered 30-species microbial consortium (Microbial Ecosystem Therapeutic 4, MET4) designed for co-administration with ICIs as an alternative to FMT and assessed safety, tolerability and ecological responses in patients with advanced solid tumors. The trial achieved its primary safety and tolerability outcomes. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary ecological outcomes; however, differences in MET4 species relative abundance were evident after randomization that varied by patient and species. Increases in the relative abundance of several MET4 taxa, including Enterococcus and Bifidobacterium , taxa previously associated with ICI responsiveness, were observed and MET4 engraftment was associated with decreases in plasma and stool primary bile acids. This trial is the first report of the use of a microbial consortium as an alternative to FMT in advanced cancer patients receiving ICI and the results justify the further development of microbial consortia as a therapeutic co-intervention for ICI treatment in cancer. • MET4-IO is a first-in-class oral multi-strain microbiome therapeutic in advanced cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. • The trial achieved its primary safety and tolerability outcomes. • No differences in the primary ecological outcomes were observed. • Differences in MET4 species relative abundance were evident after randomization that varied by patient and species. • The efficacy of MET4 with anti-PD1 will be explored in a phase II study in advanced head and neck cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: FIGHT‐102 was a phase 1, dose‐escalation, dose‐expansion study of pemigatinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Here, we report safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of pemigatinib from FIGHT‐102. Methods: Patients (≥20 years old) self‐administered oral pemigatinib 9, 13.5, or 18 mg QD on intermittent dosing (Part 1) or 13.5 mg QD intermittent or continuous dosing (Part 2). A dosing cycle was 21 days (2 weeks on/1 week off or 21 continuous days). Primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy. Results: Forty‐four patients (Part 1, n = 14; Part 2, n = 30) were enrolled; most common tumors, cholangiocarcinoma, n = 8; esophageal, n = 6; 26 patients had confirmed FGF/FGFR alterations (Part 1, n = 3; Part 2, n = 23); 70.5% had ≥3 prior systemic therapies. Maximum tolerated dose was not identified. The recommended phase 2 dosage was determined to be 13.5 mg QD. Most common treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were hyperphosphatemia (81.8%), dysgeusia (45.5%), stomatitis (43.2%), and alopecia (38.6%); most frequent Grade ≥3 TEAEs were anemia and decreased appetite (9.1% each). In Part 1, no patient achieved partial response (PR) or complete response, and 7 (50.0%) patients had stable disease (SD). In Part 2, 5 (16.7%) patients achieved PR (one each with cholangiocarcinoma, gall bladder cancer, breast cancer, urothelial tract/bladder cancer, and sweat gland carcinoma) and 6 (20%) had SD. Median duration of response was 9.56 months (95% CI: 4.17, 14.95). Conclusions: Pemigatinib demonstrated manageable adverse events, consistent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics profiles, and preliminary efficacy in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeTo evaluate the safety, recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and efficacy of pexidartinib, a colony stimulating factor receptor 1 (CSF-1R) inhibitor, in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.Patients and methodsIn part 1 of this phase Ib study, 24 patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating doses of pexidartinib with weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2). Pexidartinib was administered at 600 mg/day in cohort 1. For subsequent cohorts, the dose was increased by ⩽50% using a standard 3+3 design. In part 2, 30 patients with metastatic solid tumors were enrolled to examine safety, tolerability and efficacy of the RP2D. Pharmacokinetics and biomarkers were also assessed.ResultsA total of 51 patients reported ≥1 adverse event(s) (AEs) that were at least possibly related to either study drug. Grade 3-4 AEs, including anemia (26%), neutropenia (22%), lymphopenia (19%), fatigue (15%), and hypertension (11%), were recorded in 38 patients (70%). In part 1, no maximum tolerated dose was achieved and 1600 mg/day was determined to be the RP2D. Of 38 patients evaluable for efficacy, 1 (3%) had complete response, 5 (13%) partial response, 13 (34%) stable disease, and 17 (45%) progressive disease. No drug-drug interactions were found. Plasma CSF-1 levels increased 1.6- to 53-fold, and CD14dim/CD16+ monocyte levels decreased by 57-100%.ConclusionsThe combination of pexidartinib and paclitaxel was generally well tolerated. RP2D for pexidartinib was 1600 mg/day. Pexidartinib blocked CSF-1R signaling, indicating potential for mitigating macrophage tumor infiltration.

Background: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s tumor-agnostic approval of pembrolizumab in high tumor mutational burden (TMB-high, i.e., TMB≥10 mut/Mb) cases, based on the data from KEYNOTE-158, has raised considerable concerns among the immuno-oncology community. This study aims to statistically infer the optimal universal cutoff in defining TMB-high that is predictive of the efficacy of anti-PD-(L) 1 therapy in advanced solid tumors.Methods: We integrated MSK-IMPACT TMB data from a public cohort and the objective response rate (ORR) for anti-PD-(L) 1 monotherapy across diverse cancer types in published trials. The optimal TMB cutoff was determined by varying the universal cutoff to define TMB-high across cancer types and examining the cancer-level correlation between objective response rate and the proportion of TMB-high cases. The utility of this cutoff in predicting overall survival (OS) benefits from anti-PD-(L) 1 therapy was then evaluated in a validation cohort of advanced cancers with coupled MSK-IMPACT TMB and OS data. In silico analysis of whole-exome sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas was further employed to assess the generalizability of the identified cutoff among panels comprising several hundred genes.Results: The cancer type-level analysis identified 10 mut/Mb as the optimal cutoff for MSK-IMPACT in defining TMB-high, with the corresponding TMB-high (TMB≥10 mut/Mb) percentage strongly correlated with ORR for PD-(L) 1 blockade across cancer types [correlation coefficient, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.45–0.88)]. This cutoff was also the optimum in defining TMB-high (via MSK-IMPACT) when predicting OS benefits from anti-PD-(L) 1 therapy in the validation cohort. In this cohort, TMB≥10 mut/Mb was associated with significantly improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.48–0.71]; p < 0.001). Moreover, in silico analyses revealed excellent agreement of TMB≥10 mut/Mb cases between MSK-IMPACT and the FDA-approved panels and between MSK-IMPACT and various randomly sampled panels.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that 10 mut/Mb is the optimal, universal cutoff for TMB-high that guides the clinical application of anti-PD-(L) 1 therapy for advanced solid tumors. It also provides rigorous evidence beyond KEYNOTE-158 for the utility of TMB≥10 mut/Mb in predicting the efficacy of PD-(L) 1 blockade in broader settings, which could help to mitigate the challenges in embracing the tumor-agnostic approval of pembrolizumab in TMB-high cases.

Introduction: Combination therapeutic mode is likely to be the key to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy in a wider range of cancer patients. Herein, we conducted an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial that enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors who had progressed after standard treatments. Methods: Radiotherapy of 24 Gy/3 fractions/3-10 days was given to the targeted lesions. Liposomal irinotecan (80mg/m², dose could be adjusted to 60 mg/m² for intolerable cases) was intravenously (IV) administered once within 48 hours after radiotherapy. Then, camrelizumab (200mg IV, q3w) and anti-angiogenic drugs were given regularly until disease progression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in the target lesions evaluated by investigators per RECIST 1.1. The secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Results: Between November 2020 and June 2022, 60 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.5-12.5). Of 52 evaluable patients, the overall ORR and DCR were 34.6% and 82.7%, respectively. Fifty patients with target lesions were evaluable, the ORR and DCR of the target lesions were 35.3% and 82.4%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 5.3 months (95% CI 3.6, 6.2), and the median overall survival was not reached. TRAEs (all grades) occurred in 55 (91.7%) patients. The most common grade 3-4 TRAEs were lymphopenia (31.7%), anemia (10.0%), and leukopenia (10.0%). Conclusion: The combination of radiotherapy, liposomal irinotecan, camrelizumab, and anti-angiogenesis therapy demonstrated promising antitumor activity and well tolerance in various advanced solid tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fruquintinib (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor 1/2/3) plus sintilimab (anti-programmed death-1) demonstrated enhanced anti-tumour effects versus monotherapy in a preclinical study. We investigated the combination in patients with advanced solid tumours, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In this phase 1b/2, open-label, multi-centre, multi-cohort dose-escalation and dose-expansion study, patients with advanced solid tumours (dose-escalation) or mCRC (one cohort in dose-expansion) received different doses of fruquintinib plus a fixed dose of sintilimab once every 4 weeks (Q4W) or 3 weeks (Q3W). Primary objectives were safety, tolerability, and the preliminary efficacy. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03903705. By the data cut-off date (30th December 2021), 23 patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation and 37 patients in the mCRC cohort of the dose-expansion; 44 patients with mCRC who received sintilimab Q3W were pooled for analysis. One dose-limiting toxicity event (grade 3 troponin T increased) occurred during the dose escalation. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 43.5% and 47.7% of patients in the dose-escalation phase and pooled mCRC analysis, respectively. Among patients treated with the recommended phase 2 dose (fruquintinib 5 mg once daily, 2 weeks on/1 week off, plus sintilimab 200 mg Q3W) in pooled mCRC analysis, the objective response rate was 23.8% (95% CI 8.2–47.2), median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI 5.4–8.3), and overall survival was 14.8 months (95% CI 8.8–not reached); in patients with mismatch repair-proficient mCRC, these were 20.0% (95% CI 4.3–48.1), 6.9 months (95% CI 4.8–10.1), and 20.0 months (95% CI 8.1–not reached), respectively. Fruquintinib plus sintilimab was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumours and showed promising efficacy in mCRC. • Fruquintinib plus sintilimab was tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumour. • Fruquintinib plus sintilimab showed anti-tumour activity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. • The combination had promising clinical activity in patients with mismatch repair-proficient metastatic colorectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This phase 1 trial evaluated the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of surufatinib, a small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with toripalimab, a programmed cell death protein-1 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This is an open-label, dose-escalation and expansion study in patients with solid tumors who had failed standard therapies or had no effective treatment. In the dose-escalation stage, patients were treated with surufatinib, at dose levels of 200, 250, or 300 mg once daily (QD) in combination with toripalimab 240 mg, every 3 weeks (Q3W), to estimate maximum tolerated dose. Additional patients were enrolled in the dose expansion stage to further assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics profile. Recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was determined based on the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy from dose-escalation and expansion stages. Results: From Feb 14, 2019 to Dec 20, 2020, 33 patients were screened, of which 30 patients were enrolled. One patient in the 300 mg cohort experienced dose limited toxicity, a grade 3 hyperthyroidism. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were hypertension (20.0%), transaminases increased (13.3%), and blood bilirubin increased (13.3%). No treatment-related death or treatment discontinuation was identified. The RP2D was determined to be surufatinib 250 mg QD plus toripalimab 240 mg Q3W. Objective response rate was 24.1% (95% confidence interval 10.3‒43.5%) in this study. Conclusions: Surufatinib plus toripalimab was well tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals, and showed preliminary anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03879057; registration date: March 18, 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In this open‐label, Phase 1 study, we explore the safety and efficacy of E7389‐LF (liposomal formulation of eribulin) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This open‐label, Phase 1 study enrolled Japanese adult patients to receive E7389‐LF for the treatment of advanced solid tumors. Treatment with E7389‐LF 2.0 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (previously determined maximum tolerated dose) was tested for the treatment of adenoid cystic carcinoma, gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, or small lung cell cancer in the expansion part of this study. Secondary endpoints included safety, objective response rate, best overall response, and progression‐free survival. Results: As of October 16, 2020, 43 patients were enrolled (adenoid cystic carcinoma, n = 12; gastric cancer, n = 10; esophageal cancer, n = 11; small cell lung cancer, n = 10). Thirty‐three patients experienced a Grade ≥3 treatment‐related treatment‐emergent adverse event, most commonly neutropenia (53.5%). Additionally, the incidence of hypersensitivity did not appear to change with a reduced number of infusion steps (2 vs. 4) and patients who were administered prophylactic pegylated granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor had a noticeably lower incidence of Grade 3–4 neutropenia (although this did not have a proper control). The overall objective response rate was 11.6% (95% confidence interval: 3.9–25.1), corresponding to two partial responses in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma, two partial responses in gastric cancer, and one partial response in esophageal cancer. Median progression‐free survival was longer in the adenoid cystic carcinoma population (16.6 months) than in others. Conclusions: E7389‐LF 2.0 mg/m2 every 3 weeks was well tolerated for the treatment of several different tumor types, and larger studies in these populations are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • The first UPLC-MS/MS method for analyzing BPI-460372 and its metabolites in human plasma. • The method is sensitive, simple, accurate, and reliable. • It can provide support further clinical studies and pharmacokinetic analysis. In cancer development and progression, the Hippo signaling pathway functions. The transcriptional enhanced associate domain (TEAD) stands out as a pivotal transcription factor within this pathway, and the suppression of TEAD represents a promising approach for cancer treatment. The primary aim of the study was to establish an analytical method for the concurrent quantification of a novel TEAD target inhibitor, BPI-460372, and its principal metabolites, BPI-460444 and BPI-460456, in human plasma. The chromatographic separation utilized a XSelect™ HSS C 18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 2.5 µm), while quantification was conducted on a SCIEX API 4000 mass spectrometer. 22 plasma samples were tested via the developed method. The calibration curve for BPI-460372 exhibited linearity from 2 to 2000 ng/mL, while its metabolites BPI-460444 and BPI-460456 had linearity between 1 and 1000 ng/mL (r > 0.99). The precision (RSD) was ≤ 17.1 %, and the accuracy (RE) fell within the range of −17.7 % to 15.0 %, all meeting acceptance criteria. The matrix effect was from 101.0 % to 105.8 %. The extraction recovery of analytes fell within the range of 96.8 % to 104.1 % with an RSD of less than 7.4 %. The developed method was effectively utilized in an advanced solid tumor patient, and the concentration trends of the three analytes in plasma were found to be largely consistent. The established analytical method showed great sensitivity, simplicity, accuracy, and reliability for the rapid and simultaneous analysis of the TEAD target inhibitor BPI-460372, alongside its major metabolites BPI-460444 and BPI-460456 in human plasma. This analytical method provided essential support for future clinical investigations and pharmacokinetic analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have provided clinical benefits for a subset of patients with advanced breast cancer; however, treatment resistance generally emerges over time in patients with breast cancer, and the efficacy of existing CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with other cancers is modest. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and preliminary antitumor efficacy of a novel, orally available CDK4/6 inhibitor, FCN-437c, in patients with advanced solid tumors. The results demonstrated promising signs of durable tumor response and disease control in this patient population. The safety profile was consistent with that of approved CDK4/6 inhibitors, with no concerning signals in terms of pulmonary, cardiac, or thrombotic risk. The efficacy and safety of FCN-437c merit further study, and this novel agent holds promise as a new alternative treatment for patients with few options. A phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of FCN-437c, a novel, orally available cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CDK4/6i), in participants with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (aSTs). FCN-437c was escalated from 50 mg (once daily [QD] on days 1–21 of 28-day cycles) to the MTD/RP2D. In the dose-expansion phase, patients with CDK4/6i-treated breast cancer, or KRAS-mutant (KRASmut) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received the MTD. Twenty-two patients were enrolled. The most common tumors in the dose-escalation phase (n = 15) were breast, colorectal, and lung (each n = 4 [27.3%]). The dose-expansion phase included five (71.4%) patients with breast cancer and two (28.6%) with KRASmut NSCLC. Twenty (90.9%) participants experienced FCN-437c–related adverse events. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in two (33.3%) participants (200-mg dose, dose-escalation phase): grade 3 neutropenia and grade 4 neutrophil count decreased. Due to toxicities reported at 150 mg QD, the MTD was de-escalated to 100 mg QD. One (4.5%) participant (KRASmut NSCLC, 100-mg dose) achieved a partial response lasting 724+ days, and five (22.7%) had stable disease lasting 56+ days. In conclusion, FCN-437c was well tolerated with encouraging signs of antitumor activity and disease control. Further exploration of FCN-437c in aSTs is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: This study compared the bioavailability of two pimitespib formulations (Formulations A and B), evaluated the food effect on Formulation A, and evaluated the safety and efficacy of multiple pimitespib doses in patients with solid tumors. This clinical, pharmacological multicenter study had two cohorts and periods. A single dose of Formulation A or B was administered in a crossover design to compare the pharmacokinetics in Cohort 1. In Cohort 2, the effects of fed vs fasting conditions were evaluated among those receiving Formulation A. Subsequently, multiple Formulation A doses were administered to all patients for safety and efficacy assessments. In Cohorts 1 and 2, 12 and 16 patients, respectively, were analyzed for pharmacokinetics. Thirty patients were analyzed for safety and efficacy. Maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC)last, and AUCinf geometric mean ratios for Formulations A and B (90% confidence interval [CI]) were 0.8078 (0.6569–0.9933), 0.7973 (0.6672–0.9529), and 0.8094 (0.6697–0.9782), respectively; 90% CIs were not within the bioequivalence range (0.80–1.25). In Cohort 2, mean Cmax, AUClast, and AUCinf were higher in fed vs fasting conditions. No safety concerns emerged with single or multiple administration. Overall response rate, disease control rate, and median progression-free survival were 0%, 33%, and 1.5 months, respectively. Four patients had stable disease ≥ 5 months. Bioequivalence of the two formulations was unconfirmed. Systemic exposure of Formulation A was approximately 20% less than Formulation B. A high-fat/calorie meal increased the relative pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a single 160-mg dose. Trial Registration: JapicCTI-184191 (Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center) registered on November 5, 2018. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Data for avelumab (anti-PD-L1 antibody) in Chinese patients are limited. Patients & methods: Phase I/Ib, open-label, dose-escalation study of Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. Primary study objectives were to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of avelumab. Results: 24 patients received avelumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W; n = 3), 10 mg/kg Q2W (n = 7), 20 mg/kg Q2W (n = 6) or 10 mg/kg weekly for 12 weeks and then Q2W thereafter (n = 8). MTD was not reached. Avelumab exposure was increased in higher dose groups. Partial responses occurred in two patients (confirmed in one patient); best overall response was stable disease in nine patients. Conclusion: Data for avelumab in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors were consistent with previous global studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Vorolanib is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti-angiogenic properties. This study aimed to evaluate the tolerability, safety and efficacy of vorolanib when added to checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: We conducted a phase 1b study of vorolanib (300 or 400 mg orally once daily) plus pembrolizumab or nivolumab using a standard 3 + 3 design to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The endpoints included safety, toxicity and objective response rate, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Results: Sixteen patients (9 in pembrolizumab arm, 7 in nivolumab arm) with gastrointestinal or lung cancers were enrolled. All patients had at least 1 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). The most common TRAEs across all cohorts were lymphopenia (n = 7), leukopenia (n = 5), fatigue (n = 5), and alanine aminotransferase elevation (n = 5); most toxicities were grade (G) 1–2. DLTs were reported in 3 patients at vorolanib 400 mg dose level, with G3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation, G3 rectal hemorrhage, and G3 rash. Of 13 total response-evaluable patients, 2 patients had confirmed partial responses (1 rectal squamous cell cancer and 1 small cell lung cancer). Two patients achieved prolonged stable disease. Vorolanib 300 mg daily was determined to be the RP2D for either pembrolizumab or nivolumab. Conclusion: Combination vorolanib 300 mg orally once daily plus CPI appears to be a feasible regimen with manageable toxicity and promising efficacy in select tumor types. NCT03511222. Date of Registration: April 18, 2018. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was conducted to characterize sources of interpatient variability on the PK of TAK-931, a cell division cycle 7 kinase inhibitor, in adult patients with advanced solid tumors using data from 198 patients who received oral TAK-931 over the range of 30 to 150 mg once daily in multiple dosing schedules in 2 phase 1 and 1 phase 2 clinical studies. A 2-compartment model with 2 transit compartments describing the absorption and first-order linear elimination adequately described the PK of TAK-931. The apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of TAK-931 was estimated to be 38 L/h, and the terminal half-life was estimated to be approximately 6 hours. Creatinine clearance (CrCL) was identified as a covariate on CL/F, and body weight as a covariate on CL/F, apparent central volume of distribution, and apparent intercompartmental clearance. Simulations using the final model indicated that the effect of CrCL (=35 mL/min) or body weight (29.8-127 kg) on TAK-931 systemic exposures was not considered clinically meaningful, suggesting that no dose adjustments were necessary to account for body weight or renal function (CrCL =35 mL/min). Sex, age (36-88 years), race, and mild hepatic impairment had no impact on the CL/F of TAK-931. Taken together, the population PK analysis supports the same starting dose of TAK-931 in Asian and Western cancer patients in a global setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this first-in-human phase 1 study (NCT02964013; MK-7684-001), we investigated the safety and efficacy of the anti-TIGIT (T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain) antibody vibostolimab as monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab. Part A enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors, and part B enrolled patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients received vibostolimab 2.1-700 mg alone or with pembrolizumab 200 mg in part A and vibostolimab 200 mg alone or with pembrolizumab 200 mg in part B. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Part A enrolled 76 patients (monotherapy, 34; combination therapy, 42). No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. Across doses, 56% of patients receiving monotherapy and 62% receiving combination therapy had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 9% and 17% of patients, respectively. The most common TRAEs were fatigue (15%) and pruritus (15%) with monotherapy and pruritus (17%) and rash (14%) with combination therapy. Confirmed ORR was 0% with monotherapy and 7% with combination therapy. In part B, 39 patients had anti-PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1)/PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1)-naive NSCLC (all received combination therapy), and 67 had anti-PD-1/PD-L1-refractory NSCLC (monotherapy, 34; combination therapy, 33). In patients with anti-PD-1/PD-L1-naive NSCLC: 85% had TRAEs–the most common were pruritus (38%) and hypoalbuminemia (31%); confirmed ORR was 26%, with responses occurring in both PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors. In patients with anti-PD-1/PD-L1-refractory NSCLC: 56% receiving monotherapy and 70% receiving combination therapy had TRAEs–the most common were rash and fatigue (21% each) with monotherapy and pruritus (36%) and fatigue (24%) with combination therapy; confirmed ORR was 3% with monotherapy and 3% with combination therapy. Vibostolimab plus pembrolizumab was well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors, including patients with advanced NSCLC. • First-in-human phase 1 study in patients with advanced solid tumors who received vibostolimab alone or with pembrolizumab. • Vibostolimab plus pembrolizumab was well tolerated in advanced solid tumors. • Vibostolimab plus pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Citarinostat (CC-96241; previously ACY-241), an oral inhibitor of histone deacetylases (HDACs) with selectivity for HDAC6, has demonstrated synergistic anticancer activity with paclitaxel in multiple solid tumor models. Combination therapy using citarinostat with paclitaxel was evaluated in this phase Ib 3 + 3 dose-escalation study in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors received citarinostat 180, 360, or 480 mg once daily on days 1 to 21 plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary endpoints included safety, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Results: Twenty patients were enrolled and received study treatment; 15 had received prior taxane therapy. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported at any dose; therefore, the MTD was not identified. Citarinostat 360 vs 480 mg was associated with reduced incidence and severity of neutropenia. Three patients experienced a confirmed partial response and 13 achieved stable disease. Pharmacokinetic parameters were linear up to citarinostat 360 mg, the dose at which the highest levels of histone and tubulin acetylation were observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Conclusions: The combination of citarinostat plus paclitaxel showed an acceptable safety profile, with no unexpected or dose-limiting toxicities and potential evidence of antitumor activity in patients with heavily pretreated advanced solid tumors. Citarinostat 360 mg once daily is considered the recommended phase II dose for use in combination with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 every 3 of 4 weeks. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02551185). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Angiogenesis and activation of the epidermal growth factor (EGFR) pathway play an essential role in tumor proliferation and metastasis. Targeting angiogenesis or EGFR alone does not yield adequate tumor control in most solid tumors. Overcoming intrinsic and/or acquired resistance may need a doublet or triplet therapy strategy. Herein, we report the safety and feasibility of dual EGFR blockade with EGFR monoclonal antibody and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor combined with anti-VEGF antibody in advanced solid tumors. Methods We conducted a phase I study combining erlotinib, cetuximab, and bevacizumab. Patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors (excluding colorectal and non-small cell lung cancers) were analyzed for safety, toxicity profile, and response. Anti-tumor activity was evaluated per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST 1.0). Results Thirty-six patients received treatment on a range of dose-levels. The most frequent tumor types enrolled were cervical (n = 10), head and neck squamous cell (n = 10), and follicular thyroid (n = 4) cancers. The most common treatment-related grade ≥ 2 adverse events were rash (56%), hypomagnesemia (17%), pruritus (11%), diarrhea (8%), and tumor-related bleeding (8%). Seventeen of 19 patients (89%) treated at the maximum tolerated dose did not present treatment-related dose-limiting toxicity. Fifteen (63%) of the 24 evaluable patients achieved a disease control (stable disease ≥ 4 months (n = 14) and partial response (n = 1). The median number of prior lines of therapies was 3 (range 1–10). Conclusions The triplet combination of erlotinib, cetuximab, and bevacizumab was well tolerated, conferring clinical benefit in heavily pretreated patients. Future studies are warranted with second or third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase triplet combinations in the EGFR pathway aberrant patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00543504. Sponsor(s): National Cancer Institute (NCI), MD Anderson Cancer Center

BackgroundCitarinostat (CC-96241; previously ACY-241), an oral inhibitor of histone deacetylases (HDACs) with selectivity for HDAC6, has demonstrated synergistic anticancer activity with paclitaxel in multiple solid tumor models. Combination therapy using citarinostat with paclitaxel was evaluated in this phase Ib 3 + 3 dose-escalation study in patients with advanced solid tumors.MethodsPatients with previously treated advanced solid tumors received citarinostat 180, 360, or 480 mg once daily on days 1 to 21 plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary endpoints included safety, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics.ResultsTwenty patients were enrolled and received study treatment; 15 had received prior taxane therapy. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported at any dose; therefore, the MTD was not identified. Citarinostat 360 vs 480 mg was associated with reduced incidence and severity of neutropenia. Three patients experienced a confirmed partial response and 13 achieved stable disease. Pharmacokinetic parameters were linear up to citarinostat 360 mg, the dose at which the highest levels of histone and tubulin acetylation were observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.ConclusionsThe combination of citarinostat plus paclitaxel showed an acceptable safety profile, with no unexpected or dose-limiting toxicities and potential evidence of antitumor activity in patients with heavily pretreated advanced solid tumors. Citarinostat 360 mg once daily is considered the recommended phase II dose for use in combination with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 every 3 of 4 weeks. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02551185).

Background: LHC165 is a Toll-like receptor (TLR)-7 agonist that generates an effective tumor antigen-specific T-cell adaptive immune response as well as durable antitumor responses. We aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, dose-limiting toxicities, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of LHC165 single agent (SA) ± spartalizumab [PDR001; anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)] in adult patients with advanced solid tumors., Materials and Methods: In this phase I/Ib, open-label, dose-escalation/expansion study, patients received LHC165 SA 100-600 μg biweekly through intratumoral (IT) injection and LHC165 600 μg biweekly + spartalizumab 400 mg Q4W through intravenous (IV) infusion., Results: Forty-five patients were enrolled: 21 patients received LHC165 SA, and 24 patients received LHC165 + spartalizumab. The median duration of exposure was 8 weeks (range 2-129 weeks). No maximum tolerated dose was reached. Recommended dose expansion was established as LHC165 600 μg biweekly as SA and in combination with spartalizumab 400 mg Q4W. The most common drug-related adverse events (AEs) were pyrexia (22.2%), pruritus (13.3%), chills (11.1%), and asthenia (4.4%). The only serious AE (SAE) suspected to be related to the study drug was grade 3 pancreatitis (n = 1). Across all tumor types, overall response rate and disease control were 6.7% and 17.8%, respectively. Overall median progression-free survival (PFS) and immune-related PFS was 1.7 months. LHC165 serum PK demonstrated an initial rapid release followed by a slower release due to continued release of LHC165 from the injection site., Conclusions: LHC165 demonstrated acceptable safety and tolerability both as SA and in combination with spartalizumab, and evidence of limited antitumor activity was seen in adult patients with relapsed/refractory or metastatic solid tumors., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: This phase Ib study was performed to determine the safety of combination capecitabine with alpleisib (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit p110α blockade) and determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase ll dose (RP2D) of this combination regimen in patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy. The synergistic anti-tumor activity and pharmacokinetics (PK) were investigated., Methods: Dose escalation phases were conducted in patients with advanced solid cancers who were refractory to standard therapy regardless of PIK3CA mutation. Patients were administered orally once daily alpelisib (200mg and 300mg) and twice daily capecitabine (850mg, 1000mg, 1250mg orally, days 1-14) every 3 weeks. Standard "3 + 3" dose escalation was used to define the MTD. The effect of alpelisib on the PK of capecitabine was assessed., Results: Patients with 6 colorectal cancer (three PIK3CA mutation) and 6 breast cancer (all PIK3CA mutation) were enrolled. The first three patients in dose level 0 (alpelisib 200mg daily, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 twice daily) had no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). In dose level 1 (alpelisib increased to 300 mg daily, capecitabine 1,000mg twice daily), one of six patients had DLT (grade (Gr) 3 hyperglycemia). When dose level 2 (alpelisib 300mg daily, capecitabine 1,250 mg/m 2 twice daily) was expanded to 3 patients, no patients had DLTs. The combination of alpelisib 300mg daily and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m 2 twice daily was declared as the MTD/RP2D in patients with advanced solid tumors. The most common AEs were Gr 1-3 hyperglycemia (75.0%). Frequent all-grade, treatment-related AEs included Gr 2-3 nausea (75.0%), Gr 1-2 diarrhea (50.0%), Gr 1-2 hand-foot syndrome (41.7%), Gr 1-2 anorexia (41.7%), Gr 2 mucositis (33.3%). Antitumor activity was observed in patients with PIK3CA mutant breast cancer (3 partial response and 3 stable disease of total 6 patients). Alpelisib exposure (C max and AUC 0-12 ) was unaffected by concomitant capecitabine. There were no clinically relevant drug-drug interactions observed between alpelisib and capecitabine., Conclusions: The combination of alpelisib and capecitabine is generally tolerated, without pharmacokinetic interactions, and shows antitumor activity in patients with PIK3CA mutant advanced cancers., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Lim, Kim, Kim, Hyun, Park, Kim and Lee.)

Nowadays, natural killer (NK) cell-based immunotherapy provides a practical therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced solid tumors (STs). This approach is adaptively conducted by the autologous and identical NK cells after in vitro expansion and overnight activation. However, the NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy has been faced with some fundamental and technical limitations. Moreover, the desirable outcomes of the NK cell therapy may not be achieved due to the complex tumor microenvironment by inhibition of intra-tumoral polarization and cytotoxicity of implanted NK cells. Currently, stem cells (SCs) technology provides a powerful opportunity to generate more effective and universal sources of the NK cells. Till now, several strategies have been developed to differentiate types of the pluripotent and adult SCs into the mature NK cells, with both feeder layer-dependent and/or feeder laye-free strategies. Higher cytokine production and intra-tumoral polarization capabilities as well as stronger anti-tumor properties are the main features of these SCs-derived NK cells. The present review article focuses on the principal barriers through the conventional NK cell immunotherapies for patients with advanced STs. It also provides a comprehensive resource of protocols regarding the generation of SCs-derived NK cells in an ex vivo condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background The study determined the safety, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), and recommended Phase II dose of BCT-100 for arginine auxotrophic tumours in a non-Chinese population. Methods This is a Phase I, 3 + 3 dose-escalation, open-label, multi-centre study in two arginine auxotrophic cancers—Malignant Melanoma (MM) and Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC). Patients were enrolled to receive weekly intravenous BCT-100. The dose cohorts were respectively 0.5 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg, 1.7 mg/kg and 2.7 mg/kg. Results There were 14 MM and 9 CRPC patients, 16 males and 7 females with a median age of 71. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. Among all the AEs, 18 were drug-related (mostly were Grade 1). Although there were individual variations in PKs amongst the patients in each cohort, the median arginine level was maintained at 2.5 µM (lower limit of quantification) in all 4 cohorts of patients after the second BCT-100 injection. Therapeutic Arginine Depletion was found in the 1.7 and 2.7 mg/kg/week cohorts when anti-tumor activities were observed. The two cohorts had a similar AUC (20,947 and 19,614 h*µg/ml respectively). Since the 2.7 mg/kg/week cohort had a more sustained arginine depletion for 2 weeks, the 2.7 mg/kg/week dose is chosen as the future phase II dose. There were two complete remissions (1 MM & 1 CRPC), 1PR (MM) and 2 stable diseases with a disease control rate (CR + PR + SD) of 5/23 (22%). Conclusions BCT-100 is safe in a non-Chinese population and has anti-tumor activities in both MM and CRPC. Weekly BCT-100 at 2.7 mg/kg is defined as the optimal biological dose for future clinical phase II studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This first-in-human study (NCT02947152) evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of HKT288, a first-in-class CDH6-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). Experimental Design: HKT288 was administered intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks until patients experienced unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease (PD). The starting dose of 0.3 mg/kg was determined based on the highest nonseverely toxic dose in monkeys, which was 2 mg/kg IV weekly. Based on preclinical toxicology, skin, eyes, bone marrow, and liver were expected targets of toxicity. Results: Nine patients were enrolled: 5 with renal cell carcinoma and 4 with epithelial ovarian cancer. The best overall response on the 0.3 mg/kg cohort in patients with measurable disease was RECIST v1.1 stable disease in 3 patients and PD in 2 patients. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) regardless of causality were pyrexia (44.4%), constipation (44.4%), fatigue (33.3%), and vomiting (33.3%). Three suspected-related neurologic AEs (Grade 2) were reported on the 0.75 mg/kg cohort: seizure in 1 patient and another patient with aphasia and encephalopathy. Further studies were unable to identify the underlying mechanism of the neurologic AEs, and the study was terminated early. Conclusions: Preclinical toxicology did not predict the neurotoxicity observed with HKT288, and a comprehensive assessment performed post hoc did not identify the mechanism of toxicity. The development of further CDH6-targeting ADCs should be pursued with caution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective and methodsIn this phase 1b study, patients with stage 4 or unresectable stage 3 melanoma were treated with escalating doses of lenvatinib (once daily) and temozolomide (TMZ) (days 1-5) in 28-day cycles, to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination. Dose Level (DL)1: lenvatinib 20 mg, TMZ 100 mg/m2; DL2: lenvatinib 24 mg, TMZ 100 mg/m2; DL3: lenvatinib 24 mg, TMZ 150 mg/m2. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded and tumor response assessed per RECIST 1.0.ResultsDose-limiting toxicity occurred in 1 of 32 treated patients (DL1); MTD was not reached. The highest dose administered was lenvatinib 24 mg + TMZ 150 mg/m2. Most common treatment-related AEs included fatigue (56.3%), hypertension (53.1%), and proteinuria (46.9%). Overall objective response rate was 18.8% (6 patients), all partial response; (DL1, n = 1; DL3, n = 5). Stable disease (SD) ≥ 16 weeks was observed in 28.1% of patients (DL1 and DL2, n = 1 each; DL3, n = 7); 12.5% of patients had SD ≥ 23 weeks. Single and repeat-dose pharmacokinetics of lenvatinib were comparable across cycles and with concomitant TMZ administration.ConclusionsLenvatinib 24 mg/day + TMZ 150 mg/m2/day (days 1-5) demonstrated modest clinical activity, an acceptable safety profile, and was administered without worsening of either lenvatinib- or TMZ-related toxicities in this patient group.

Lessons Learned: Subcutaneous injection was an effective route of administration for envafolimab with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors.Subcutaneous envafolimab was well tolerated and had durable antitumor activity at a wide range of doses and schedules.Envafolimab has the potential to be a more convenient option than currently approved intravenous PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors. Background: Envafolimab is a novel fusion of a humanized single‐domain PD‐L1 antibody and human IgG1 Fc fragment formulated for subcutaneous injection. This study explored the safety and feasibility of subcutaneous administration of envafolimab as an alternative to intravenous administration of PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced, refractory solid tumors. Methods: This was a first‐in‐human, open‐label phase I trial. In a dose‐escalation phase, patients received subcutaneous envafolimab 0.01–10 mg/kg once weekly following a modified 3+3 design. In a dose‐exploration phase, patients received subcutaneous envafolimab 300 mg once every 4 weeks. Results: Twenty‐eight patients were enrolled (dose escalation n = 18, dose exploration n = 10, median age 66 years; 71% male; ECOG performance score = 0 [21%] or 1 [79%]). No dose‐limiting toxicities or injection‐site reactions were reported. Envafolimab demonstrated dose‐proportional increases in area under the time‐concentration curve and maximum plasma concentration. Median time to maximum plasma concentration was 4–7 days. In the dose‐exploration phase, terminal half‐life was 14 days after dose 1 in cycle 1 and 23 days at steady state. Three patients experienced a confirmed partial response. Conclusion: Subcutaneous envafolimab had a favorable safety and pharmacokinetic profile, with promising preliminary antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]