Search

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder perforation (GBP) is a rare but life-threatening complication of acute cholecystitis. Despite advancements in imaging technology and biochemical analysis, perforations are still diagnosed intraoperatively in some cases. This situation has revealed the need for new markers in the diagnosis of perforation. In this study, we aimed to analyze the role of biomarkers in the diagnosis of perforated cholecystitis cases. METHODS: In this retrospective study, blood samples (white blood cells (WBC), hemoglobin, platelet count, C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, CRP/albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), urea, creatinine, glucose, amylase, lipase, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), total bilirubin, direct bilirubin) were analyzed in patients who were diagnosed with acute cholecystitis in the emergency department. RESULTS: One hundred seventy patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of gallbladder perforation. Sixty-three (37.1%) patients had perforation. Transition from laparoscopy to open operation, intensive care unit admission, length of hospital stay, and mortality were higher in the perforated group compared to the non-perforated group. When we analyzed the patients according to laboratory findings, there was a difference in WBC, NLR, CRP, albumin, and CAR parameters in the perforation group. In regression analysis, CRP and CAR performed better. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that CRP and CAR may be diagnostic biomarkers with low specificity and sensitivity in predicting GBP in patients with acute cholecystitis. This marker is a low-cost and easily accessible parameter that may help clinicians make an early diagnosis and plan appropriate treatment for this condition with high morbidity and mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A critical view of safety (CVS) is important to ensure safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. When the CVS is not possible, subtotal cholecystectomy is performed. While considering subtotal cholecystectomy, surgeons are often concerned about preventing bile leakage from the cystic ducts. The two main types of subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis are fenestrating and reconstituting. Previously, there were no selection criteria for these two; therefore, open conversion was performed. This study aimed to evaluate our goal-oriented approach to choose fenestrating or reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Methods: We introduced our goal-oriented approach in April 2019. Before introducing this approach, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was performed without criteria for subtotal cholecystectomy. After our approach was introduced, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was performed according to the subtotal cholecystectomy criteria. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between 2015 and 2021. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was performed by surgeons regardless of whether they were novices or veterans. Results: The period from April 2015 to March 2019 was before the introduction (BI) of our approach, the period from April 2019 to December 2021 was after the introduction (AI) of our approach. There were 177 and 186 patients with acute cholecystitis during the BI and AI periods, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of preoperative characteristics, operative time, and blood loss. No difference in the laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy rate between groups (10.2% [BI] vs. 13.9% [AI]; p = 0.266) was obserbed. The open conversion rate during the BI period was significantly higher than that during the AI period (7.4% vs. 1.6%; p = 0.015). Conclusions: Our goal-oriented approach is feasible, safe, and easy for many surgeons to understand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Emergency cholecystectomy is the mainstay in treating acute cholecystitis (AC). In actual practice, perioperative prophylactic antibiotics are used to prevent postoperative infectious complications (PIC), but their effectiveness lacks evidence. We aim to investigate the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in emergency cholecystectomy. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus up to June 14, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved patients diagnosed with mild to moderate AC according to Tokyo guidelines who were undergoing emergency cholecystectomy and were administered preoperative and/or postoperative antibiotics as an intervention group and compared to a placebo group. For dichotomous data, we applied the risk ratio (RR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI), while for continuous data, we used the mean difference (MD) and 95% CI. Results: We included seven RCTs encompassing a collective sample size of 1747 patients. Our analysis showed no significant differences regarding total PIC (RR = 0.84 with 95% CI (0.63, 1.12), P = 0.23), surgical site infection (RR = 0.79 with 95% CI (0.56, 1.12), P = 0.19), distant infections (RR = 1.01 with 95% CI (0.55, 1.88), P = 0.97), non-infectious complications (RR = 0.84 with 95% CI (0.64, 1.11), P = 0.22), mortality (RR = 0.34 with 95% CI (0.04, 3.23), P = 0.35), and readmission (RR = 0.69 with 95% CI (0.43, 1.11), P = 0.13). Conclusion: Perioperative antibiotics in patients with mild to moderate acute cholecystitis did not show a significant reduction of postoperative infectious complications after emergency cholecystectomy. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023438755). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To formulate and evaluate the diagnostic performance and utility of a new CT difficulty score in predicting difficult laparoscopic surgery in cases of gallbladder (GB) perforation. Methods: This prospective single centre study included a total of 48 diagnosed cases of GB perforation on CT between December 2021 and June 2023, out of which 24 patients were operated. A new 6-point CT difficulty scoring system was devised to predict difficult laparoscopic approach, based on patterns of inflammation around the perforated GB that were found to be surgically relevant. The pre-operative imaging findings on CT were studied in detail and correlation coefficients of various imaging findings were calculated to predict difficult surgery. Results: On CECT, the type of perforation, according to the revised Niemeier's classification could be exactly delineated in all 48 patients. A CT difficulty score of ≥ 3 was found to a good predictor difficult laparoscopic approach, with statistical significance (p = 0.001), sensitivity of 94.44%, specificity of 83.33%, PPV of 94.44% and NPV of 83.33%. Inflammatory changes around duodenum showed maximum correlation coefficient of 0.744 (p = 0.0001), around colon showed a correlation coefficient of 0.657 (p = 0.0005), and in the omentum had a correlation coefficient of 0.5 (p = 0.013)). Inter-observer agreement was also calculated for various findings and it was found to have moderate to strong agreement (κ value 0.5–1.0). Conclusion: The CT difficulty scoring system can be an effective tool in predicting difficult laparoscopic surgery in cases of GB perforation in an emergency setting which can help in decision making and improved patient outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Our aim is to demonstrate the effectiveness of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) in the treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and to show that it is a safe procedure for healthcare professionals and patients. Materials and Methods: Demographic, clinical and laboratory data, technical success of PC, clinical response to treatment, duration of hospital stay, of patients with AK who applied to our hospital and underwent PC procedure in a total of 24 months before and during the pandemic, one-month post-procedure observation, and complications were compared. Results: PC was applied to a total of 124 patients in the pre-pandemic period (52) and pandemic period (72) examined in the study. The median age was 73.5 (25-93) in the pre-pandemic period, and 64 (23-90) in the pandemic period, and the difference between these was found to be significant (p=0.004). Clinical improvement due to PC was detected in 43 (86%) patients in the pre-pandemic period, and in 61 (84.7%) patients in the pandemic period, no significant differences were detected between the two groups (p=1.000). The day of hospitalization median value was 3 (1-18) days in pandemic period, and 3 (1-30) days in the pandemic period, and no significant differences were detected between the groups (p=0.794). Conclusion: PC treatment in patients with AC during the pandemic and pre-pandemic periods is effective and safe for both the patient and the healthcare professionals who perform the procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute cholecystitis is one of the most common surgical diseases, which may progress from mild to severe cases. When combined with bacteremia, the mortality rate of acute cholecystitis reaches up to 10–20%. The standard of care in patients with acute cholecystitis is early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Percutaneous cholecystostomy or endoscopic procedures are alternative treatments in selective cases. Nevertheless, antibiotic therapy plays a key role in preventing surgical complications and limiting the systemic inflammatory response, especially in patients with moderate to severe cholecystitis. Patients with acute cholecystitis have a bile bacterial colonization rate of 35–60%. The most frequently isolated microorganisms are Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., and Clostridium spp. Early empirical antimicrobial therapy along with source control of infection is the cornerstone for a successful treatment. In these cases, the choice of antibiotic must be made considering some factors (e.g., the severity of the clinical manifestations, the onset of the infection if acquired in hospital or in the community, the penetration of the drug into the bile, and any drug resistance). Furthermore, therapy must be modified based on bile cultures in cases of severe cholecystitis. Antibiotic stewardship is the key to the correct management of bile-related infections. It is necessary to be aware of the appropriate therapeutic scheme and its precise duration. The appropriate use of antibiotic agents is crucial and should be integrated into good clinical practice and standards of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is widely adopted across nearly all surgical subspecialties in the elective setting. Initially finding indication in minor abdominal emergencies, it has gradually become the standard approach in the majority of elective general surgery procedures. Despite many technological advances and increasing acceptance, the laparoscopic approach remains underutilized in emergency general surgery and in abdominal trauma. Emergency laparotomy continues to carry a high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been a growing interest from emergency and trauma surgeons in adopting minimally invasive surgery approaches in the acute surgical setting. The present position paper, supported by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), aims to provide a review of the literature to reach a consensus on the indications and benefits of a laparoscopic-first approach in patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies or abdominal trauma. METHODS: This position paper was developed according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee performed the literature review and drafted the position paper. An international panel of 54 experts then critically revised the manuscript and discussed it in detail, to develop a consensus on a position statement. RESULTS: A total of 323 studies (systematic review and meta-analysis, randomized clinical trial, retrospective comparative cohort studies, case series) have been selected from an initial pool of 7409 studies. Evidence demonstrates several benefits of the laparoscopic approach in stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgical emergencies or abdominal trauma. The selection of a stable patient seems to be of paramount importance for a safe adoption of a laparoscopic approach. In hemodynamically stable patients, the laparoscopic approach was found to be safe, feasible and effective as a therapeutic tool or helpful to identify further management steps and needs, resulting in improved outcomes, regardless of conversion. Appropriate patient selection, surgeon experience and rigorous minimally invasive surgical training, remain crucial factors to increase the adoption of laparoscopy in emergency general surgery and abdominal trauma. CONCLUSIONS: The WSES expert panel suggests laparoscopy as the first approach for stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.

Abstract Background Emergency cholecystectomy is the mainstay in treating acute cholecystitis (AC). In actual practice, perioperative prophylactic antibiotics are used to prevent postoperative infectious complications (PIC), but their effectiveness lacks evidence. We aim to investigate the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in emergency cholecystectomy. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus up to June 14, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved patients diagnosed with mild to moderate AC according to Tokyo guidelines who were undergoing emergency cholecystectomy and were administered preoperative and/or postoperative antibiotics as an intervention group and compared to a placebo group. For dichotomous data, we applied the risk ratio (RR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI), while for continuous data, we used the mean difference (MD) and 95% CI. Results We included seven RCTs encompassing a collective sample size of 1747 patients. Our analysis showed no significant differences regarding total PIC (RR = 0.84 with 95% CI (0.63, 1.12), P = 0.23), surgical site infection (RR = 0.79 with 95% CI (0.56, 1.12), P = 0.19), distant infections (RR = 1.01 with 95% CI (0.55, 1.88), P = 0.97), non-infectious complications (RR = 0.84 with 95% CI (0.64, 1.11), P = 0.22), mortality (RR = 0.34 with 95% CI (0.04, 3.23), P = 0.35), and readmission (RR = 0.69 with 95% CI (0.43, 1.11), P = 0.13). Conclusion Perioperative antibiotics in patients with mild to moderate acute cholecystitis did not show a significant reduction of postoperative infectious complications after emergency cholecystectomy. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023438755).

Leptospirosis is a bacterium with a worldwide distribution and belongs to the group of zoonoses that can affect both humans and animals. Most cases of leptospirosis present as a mild, anicteric infection. However, a small percentage of cases develop Weil’s disease, characterized by bleeding and elevated levels of bilirubin and liver enzymes. It can also cause inflammation of the gallbladder. Acute acalculous cholecystitis has been described as a manifestation of leptospirosis in a small percentage of cases; however, no association between leptospirosis and acute acalculous cholecystitis has been found in the literature.

Abdominal pain in patients with significant alcohol use and smoking history presents diagnostic challenges due to overlapping clinical features of complications like acute cholecystitis and peptic ulcers. The unreliable physical examinations of intoxicated patients often complicate accurate diagnosis. We present a case of a 56-year-old male with a history of alcoholism and smoking, who presented to the emergency department with nonspecific abdominal pain. Initial imaging suggested cholecystitis, but due to the patient's intoxication, his physical examination was unreliable. During a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a perforated prepyloric ulcer was unexpectedly discovered, sealed by the gallbladder. This case highlights the limitations of relying solely on imaging for diagnosing abdominal conditions in intoxicated patients. The intraoperative discovery of the perforated ulcer necessitated a shift in the surgical approach, emphasizing the need for flexibility in surgical planning and a high index of suspicion for other abdominal pathologies in patients with significant lifestyle risks. The successful management of this patient through adaptive surgical techniques and comprehensive postoperative care, including Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, underscores the importance of maintaining a broad differential diagnosis and readiness to adapt surgical plans. This approach is essential for managing complex cases effectively, ensuring that both the immediate surgical issues and underlying causes are addressed to optimize recovery and prevent recurrence.

Background: Bile duct injury (BDI) is one of the most severe complications during cholecystectomy. Early identification of risk factors for BDI may permit risk reduction strategies and inform patient consent. Objective: This study aimed to define patient, provider, and systemic factors associated with BDI; BDI incidence; and short-term outcomes of BDI after urgent cholecystectomy. Methods: Patients who underwent urgent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were retrospectively screened (2020-2022). All patients who sustained BDI were included without exclusions. Demographics, clinical data, and outcomes were collected and compared with descriptive statistics. Results: During the study period, BDI occurred in 4 (0.5%) of 728 patients who underwent urgent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Most BDI cases (75%) took place overnight or during the weekend. The attending surgeon was almost exclusively (75%) in their first year of practice. BDI was recognized during index operation in 2 cases (50%). Hepatobiliary surgery performed the bile duct repair in all 4 cases. Two complications occurred (50%). All patients were followed by hepatobiliary surgery in the outpatient setting and returned to their baseline level of function within 2 months of hospital discharge. Conclusion: Most BDI occurred in procedures attended by first-year faculty during after hours cholecystectomies, suggesting a role for increased proctorship in early career attendings in addition to in-hours cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. The timely return to baseline function experienced by these patients emphasizes the favorable outcomes associated with early recognition of BDI and involvement of hepatobiliary surgery. Further examination with multicenter evaluation would be beneficial to validate these study findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to investigate the role of inflammatory markers and progranulin levels in diagnosing cholecystitis, assessing their potential as diagnostic biomarkers. The research involved 54 patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis in the emergency department. Routine complete blood count and biochemistry analyses were conducted. Blood samples were obtained, centrifuged, and stored at -80°C. Progranulin levels in sera were assessed using a spectrophotometric method. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS v.22.0, revealing significant variances between patients and healthy controls. Acute cholecystitis patients exhibited elevated levels of inflammatory markers (white blood cells, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin) and decreased progranulin levels compared to controls. Progranulin showed a high sensitivity (86.5%) and specificity (87.5%) in diagnosing acute cholecystitis. Other markers had varying sensitivity and specificity values. Inflammatory markers, particularly progranulin, show promise in diagnosing cholecystitis. Evaluating these markers together can enhance diagnostic accuracy. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and explore progranulin's specificity to cholecystitis. [Med-Science 2024; 13(3.000): 649-53]

Purpose The aim of this study was to report technical and clinical success of bedside ultrasound-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) tube placement in intensive care unit (ICU).

Background: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is a therapeutic intervention for acute cholecystitis. The benefits of cholecystostomy have been demonstrated in the medical literature, with up to 90% of acute cholecystitis cases shown to resolve postoperatively, and only 40% of patients subsequently undergoing an interval cholecystectomy. Purpose: To compare the survival outcomes between acute complicated and uncomplicated cholecystitis in patients undergoing PC as an initial intervention, as there is a paucity of evidence in the literature on this perspective. Material and Methods: A retrospective search was conducted of all patients who underwent PC for acute cholecystitis between August 2016 and December 2020 at a tertiary institution. A total of 100 patients were included in this study. Results: The outcome, in the form of 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, being alive after six months, and reintervention, was compared between complicated and uncomplicated cases using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the compared outcomes. The only variable that showed a statistically significant association with the risk of mortality was acute kidney injury (AKI) at admission. Patients who had stage 1, 2, or 3 AKI had a higher hazard for mortality as compared to patients with no kidney disease. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that PC is a safe and effective procedure. Mortality is not affected by the presence of complications. The results have, however, highlighted the importance of recognizing and treating AKI, an independent risk factor affecting mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting (ETGS) has been proposed as one of the adjunctive treatments, apart from antibiotics, before surgery in patients with acute cholecystitis whose cholecystectomy could not be performed or was deferred. Currently, there are no comparative data on the outcomes of ETGS in those who receive and do not receive ETGS. We aimed to compare the rates of recurrent cholecystitis at 3 and 6 months in these 2 groups. Between 2020 and 2023, eligible acute calculous cholecystitis patients with a high probability of common bile duct stone, who were surgical candidates but could not have an early cholecystectomy during COVID-19 surgical lockdown, were randomized into groups A (received ETGS) and B (did not receive ETGS). A definitive cholecystectomy was performed at 3 months or later in both groups. A total of 120 eligible patients were randomized into group A (n = 60) and group B (n = 60). In group A, technical and clinical success rates were 90% (54 of 60) and 100% (54 of 54), respectively. Based on intention-to-treat analysis, group A had a significantly lower rate of recurrence than group B at 3 months (0% [0 of 60] vs 18.3% [11 of 60]; P =.001). At 3–6 months, group A showed a nonsignificantly lower rate of recurrent cholecystitis compared to group B (0% [0 of 32] vs 10% [3 of 30]; P =.11). ETGS could prevent recurrent cholecystitis in acute cholecystitis patients with common bile duct stone whose cholecystectomy was deferred for 3 months. In those who did not receive ETGS, the majority of recurrences occurred within 3 months. (Thaiclinicaltrials.org , Number TCTR20200913001) [Display omitted] Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting is a useful temporary treatment before definitive cholecystectomy in patients with mild to moderate acute cholecystitis with deferred surgery for 3 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study investigates the efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for managing perioperative and postoperative pain in patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) for acute cholecystitis, particularly in high-risk elderly patients with extensive comorbidities and limited functional status. Methods: In a retrospective single-center study, 58 high-risk patients scheduled for PC were assessed. ESPB was administered to 23 patients, while 22 received conscious sedation. Pain intensity was measured using the numeric rating scale before any analgesic or ESPB administration, during the procedure and at 1 and 12 h post-procedure and secondary outcomes included adverse effects and additional analgesic requirements. Results: The ESPB group experienced significant pain reduction during and post-procedure compared to the conscious sedation group (p = 0.002). Procedure times were shorter (p = 0.015), and postoperative tramadol was less frequently needed in the ESPB group (p = 0.007). The incidence of nausea was also lower in the ESPB group (p = 0.001). No ESPB-related complications were reported. Conclusion: ESPB significantly alleviates perioperative and postoperative pain in PC patients, reducing additional analgesic use and side effects. It holds promise as a key component of pain management for high-risk surgical patients. Level of Evidence: Level 3, Non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) in the geriatric patients with acute cholecystitis. Materials and methods: The records of geriatric patients with high surgical risk who underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis were reviewed retrospectively. Results: The median age of 134 patients who underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy was 77 (65–98) years and 63.4% were women. The mean length of hospital stay was 5 (4–18) days, and the follow-up period until the procedure was 2 (1–6) days. Murphy's sign was positive in 79.1% of patients on physical examination, and the remaining patients (20.9%) had only tenderness on examination. As USG findings, 59.0% of the patients had a gall bladder wall thickness (> 4 mm) with pericholecystic fluid. Additional imaging method, abdominal CT, was performed in 29 patients (21.6%), MRCP was performed in three patients (2.2%), and ERCP was performed in one patient (0.7%). Bacterial growth was detected in 27.6% of the bile cultures performed. During the follow-up period, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 60.4% of the patients and open cholecystectomy was performed in 5.2% of the patients electively. 34.3% of the patients did not undergo any surgery. Bile leakage was detected in two patients (1.5%) as a procedure-related complication, and no mortality was observed. Conclusion: Abdominal ultrasonography-guided PC is a safe and effective method in the management of acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients in the geriatric age group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute cholecystitis (AC), generally associated with the presence of gallstones, is a relatively frequent disease that can lead to serious complications. For these reasons, AC warrants prompt clinical diagnosis and management. There is general agreement in terms of considering early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) to be the best treatment for AC. The optimal timeframe to perform ELC is within 72 h from diagnosis, with a possible extension of up to 7–10 days from symptom onset. In the first hours or days after hospital admission, before an ELC procedure, the patient's medical management comprises fasting, intravenous fluid infusion, antimicrobial therapy, and possible administration of analgesics. Additionally, concomitant conditions such as choledocholithiasis, cholangitis, biliary pancreatitis, or systemic complications must be recognized and adequately treated. The importance of ELC is related to the frequent recurrence of symptoms and complications of gallstone disease in the interval period between the onset of AC and surgical intervention. In patients who are not eligible for ELC, it is suggested to delay surgery at least 6 weeks after the clinical presentation. Critically ill patients, who are unfit for surgery, may require rescue treatments, such as percutaneous or endoscopic gallbladder drainage (GBD). A particular treatment approach should be applied to special populations such as pregnant women, cirrhotic, and elderly patients. In this review, we provide a practical diagnostic and therapeutic approach to AC, even in specific clinical situations, based on evidence from the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In this review, first, the history of EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is summarized. In the following chapters controversies arising from various approaches and challenges in EUS-BD, EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) and alternatively performed procedures are discussed from different points of view on the background of the available evidence. In addition, for all topics arguments in favor and against the techniques are described and reflected. The topics include "Why do we need procedures other than ERCP?"; "Should EUS-BD and ERCP be performed by the same operator?"; rendezvous techniques, including "Should rendezvous be used first?" and "Which rendezvous route should be used?"; percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage (PTBD); "Should PTBD and EUS-BD be performed by the same physician?"; "Do we need cystotomes?"; "Do we need bougies?"; "Are all EUS needles the same for EUS-BD?"; "Plastic or metal stents?"; and adverse events. In this 14th document in a series of papers entitled "Controversies in Endoscopic Ultrasound" we discuss various aspects of EUS-guided biliary drainage that are debated in the literature and in practice. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is still the reference technique for therapeutic biliary access, but EUS-guided techniques for biliary access and drainage have developed into safe and highly effective alternative options. However, EUS-guided biliary drainage techniques are technically demanding procedures for which few training models are currently available. Different access routes require modifications to the basic technique and specific instruments. In experienced hands, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage is also a good alternative. Therefore, in this paper, we compare arguments for different options of biliary drainage and different technical modifications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute abdomen is a frequent occurrence in emergency department settings and often necessitates prompt diagnosis and urgent surgical intervention. Owing to the overlapping symptoms of many serious and benign intra-abdominal conditions, identifying life-threatening situations early in their progression can be challenging. The current study aimed to assess the diagnostic effectiveness of abdominal ultrasound in identifying common conditions presenting as an acute abdomen. Methods: This prospective comparative study included patients presenting with an acute abdomen at the Emergency Department of CDSIMER. Clinical diagnoses were established, followed by abdominal ultrasound. Ultrasound findings were compared with intraoperative observations and histopathological results, or in cases in which surgery was not performed, based on CT scan findings. Various diagnostic performance parameters, including sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), and accuracy, were used for the statistical analysis. Results: A total of 77 patients with acute abdominal pain were included in the study. Appendicitis was the most common diagnosis (33.77%), followed by cholecystitis (20.77%), pancreatitis (16.88%), intestinal obstruction (12.98%), and enteric perforation (15.58%). USG may have moderate accuracy for some conditions, such as appendicitis, acute intestinal obstruction, and acute cholecystitis, where it has shown acceptable sensitivity. CT scans are likely to have higher overall accuracy; across different conditions, CT scans are generally expected to be more accurate than USG for diagnosing acute abdominal conditions because of their ability to provide more detailed anatomical images. Conclusion: Ultrasound is a highly effective imaging modality for accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis, acute intestinal obstruction, and acute cholecystitis. Even in hospitals lacking highly advanced imaging facilities, clinical assessment combined with ultrasound results can provide reliable diagnostic accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective, single-center cohort study was to analyze serum leucine-rich a-2-glycoprotein-1 (LRG1) expression in patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) and to investigate its variation depending on symptom duration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants were divided into patients with AC and a healthy control group. At the time of diagnosis, blood samples were collected, and symptom onset times were questioned. Collected serum LRG1 levels were measured. RESULTS: 30 patients and 30 healthy volunteers were included in the study. LRG1 (p=0.008), white blood cells (WBC) (p<0.001), platelet (p=0.003), neutrophil (p<0.001), lymphocyte (p=0.001), and CRP (p=0.014) were significantly different in AC patients vs. the control group. When the correlations of serum laboratory values with the time of onset of symptoms were compared, LRG1 (p<0.001) was significantly correlated, while no significant correlation was observed in C-reactive protein (CRP) (p=0.572), WBC (p=0.155), and neutrophil (p=0.155). CONCLUSIONS: LRG1 expression increases after 24 hours in AC patients. Due to its correlation with symptom duration, we believe it can be helpful for timing cholecystectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To analyze if, after implementation of an evidence-based local multidisciplinary protocol for acute cholecystitis (AC), an intermediate surgical audit could improve early cholecystectomy (EC) rate and other therapeutic indicators. Methods: Longitudinal cohort study at a tertiary center. The local protocol, promoted, created, and periodically revised by the Acute Care Surgery Unit (ACSu) was updated and approved on March 2019. A specific registry was prospectively fulfilled with demographics, comorbidity, type of presentation, diagnostic items, therapeutic decision, and clinical course, considering both non-operative management (NOM) or cholecystectomy, early and delayed (EC and DC). Phase 1: April 2019–April 2021. A critical analysis and a surgical audit with the participation of all the involved Departments were then performed, especially focusing on improving global EC rate, considered primary outcome. Phase 2: May 2021–May 2023. Software SPSS 23.0 was used to compare data between phases. Results: Initial EC rate was significantly higher on Phase 2 (39.3%vs52.5%, p < 0.004), as a significantly inferior rate of patients were initially bailed out from EC to NOM because of comorbidity (14.4%vs8%, p < 0.02) and grade II with severe inflammatory signs (7%vs3%, p < 0.04). A higher percentage of patients was recovered for EC after an initial decision of NOM on Phase 2, but without reaching statistical significance (21.8%vs29.2%, n.s.). Global EC rate significantly increased between phases (52.5%vs66.3%, p < 0.002) without increasing morbidity and mortality. A significant minor percentage of elective cholecystectomies after AC episodes had to be performed on Phase 2 (14%vs6.7%, p < 0.009). Complex EC and those indicated after readmission or NOM failure were usually performed by the ACSu staff. Conclusion: To adequately follow up the implementation of a local protocol for AC healthcare, registering and periodically analyzing data allow to perform intermediate surgical audits, useful to improve therapeutic indicators, especially EC rate. AC constitutes an ideal model to work with an ACSu. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Preoperative diagnosis of gallbladder amyloidosis is usually difficult. In our case, the patient exhibited gallbladder dyskinesia, which led us to suspect cholecystic amyloidosis. We were able to safely perform surgery before cholecystitis onset. Case presentation: A 59-year-old male patient with a history of multiple myeloma and cardiac amyloidosis presented to our hospital with a chief complaint of epicardial pain. Abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography revealed an enlarged gallbladder and biliary sludge without any specific imaging findings of cholecystitis. After percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder aspiration (PTGBA), the patient experienced recurrent bile retention and right upper quadrant pain. Flopropione was effective in relieving these symptoms. Based on his symptoms and laboratory findings, we diagnosed the patient with dyskinesia of the gallbladder. Considering his medical history, we suspected that it was caused by amyloidosis of the gallbladder. A laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. The histopathological examination showed amyloid deposits in the gallbladder mucosa, from the intrinsic layer to the submucosa, and in the peripheral nerves of the gallbladder neck. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 5 and has had no recurrence of abdominal pain since then. Conclusion: In our case, gallbladder dyskinesia symptoms led us to suspect gallbladder amyloidosis. We safely surgically treated the patient before cholecystitis onset. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose The aim of this study was to report technical and clinical success of bedside ultrasound-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) tube placement in intensive care unit (ICU). Materials and Methods This is a retrospective study of 51 patients (36 males:15 females, mean age: 67 years) who underwent ultrasound-guided PC from May 2015 to January 2020. The indication for cholecystostomy tube placement, comorbidities, imaging finding, technical success, clinical success, timing of surgery post-cholecystostomy tube placement, indwelling catheter time, complications, and follow-up were recorded. Results Indications for cholecystostomy tube placement were acute calculous cholecystitis (n = 43; 84.3%), perforated cholecystitis (n = 5; 9.8%), and emphysematous cholecystitis (n = 3; 5.9%). Most of the patients had multiple comorbidities; these were diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic renal disease, underlying malignancy, and multisystem disease with sepsis. All patients had undergone PC through transhepatic approach under ultrasound guidance in ICU. Technical success rate of the procedure was 100%. Clinical success rate was 92.1% (47/51) and among these 44/51 (86.2%) patients underwent definitive elective cholecystectomy, 3/51 (5.9%) patients had elective tube removal. Three of fifty-one (5.9%) patients did not improve; among these two underwent emergency surgery, while there was 1/51 (1.9%) mortality due to ongoing sepsis and multiorgan dysfunction. There were no procedure-related mortalities or procedure-related major complications. One patient had bile leak due to multiple attempts for cholecystostomy placement. Mean tube indwelling time was 13 days (range: 3–45 days). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided PC can be safely performed in ICU in critically ill patients unfit for surgery with high technical and clinical success rates. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be preferred after stabilization of clinical condition following cholecystostomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is often preferred over early cholecystectomy (EC) for elderly patients presenting with acute cholecystitis (AC). However, there is a lack of solid data on this issue. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched the Medline and Web of Science databases for reports published before December 2022. Studies that assessed elderly patients (aged 65 years and older) with AC treated using PC, in comparison with those treated with EC, were included. Outcomes analyzed were perioperative outcomes and readmissions. The literature search yielded 3279 records, from which 7 papers (1208 patients) met the inclusion criteria. No clinical trials were identified. Patients undergoing PC comprised a higher percentage of cases with ASA III or IV status (OR 3.49, 95%CI 1.59–7.69, p = 0.009) and individuals with moderate to severe AC (OR 1.78, 95%CI 1.00–3.16, p = 0.05). No significant differences were observed in terms of mortality and morbidity. However, patients in the PC groups exhibited a higher rate of readmissions (OR 3.77, 95%CI 2.35–6.05, p < 0.001) and a greater incidence of persistent or recurrent gallstone disease (OR 12.60, 95%CI 3.09–51.38, p < 0.001). Elderly patients selected for PC, displayed greater frailty and more severe AC, but did not exhibit increased post-interventional morbidity and mortality compared to those undergoing EC. Despite their inferior life expectancy, they still presented a greater likelihood of persistent or recurrent disease compared to the control group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dealing with acute cholecystitis in high-risk, critically ill, and unfit-for-surgery patients is frequent during daily practice and requires complex management. Several procedures exist to postpone and/or prevent surgical intervention in those patients who temporarily or definitively cannot undergo surgery. After a systematic review of the literature, an expert panel from the Italian Society of Emergency Surgery and Trauma (SICUT) discussed the different issues and statements in subsequent rounds. The final version of the statements was discussed during the annual meeting in Rome (September 2022). The present paper presents the definitive conclusions of the discussion. Fifteen statements based on the literature evidence were provided. The statements gave precise indications regarding the decisional process and the management of patients who cannot temporarily or definitively undergo cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Acute cholecystitis management in high-risk, critically ill, and unfit-for-surgery patients should be multidisciplinary. The different gallbladder drainage methods must be tailored according to each patient and based on the expertise of the hospital. Percutaneous gallbladder drainage is recommended as the first choice as a bridge to surgery or in severely physiologically deranged patients. Endoscopic gallbladder drainage (cholecystoduodenostomy and cholecystogastrostomy) is suggested as a second-line alternative especially as a definitive procedure for those patients not amenable to surgical management. Trans-papillary gallbladder drainage is the last option to be reserved only to those unfit for other techniques. Delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with percutaneous gallbladder drainage is suggested in all those patients recovering from the conditions that previously discouraged surgical intervention after at least 6 weeks from the gallbladder drainage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In recent years, therapeutic endoscopy has become a fundamental tool in the management of gallbladder diseases in light of its minimal invasiveness, high clinical efficacy, and good safety profile. Both endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (TGBD) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) provide effective internal drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis unfit for cholecystectomy, avoiding the drawbacks of external percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PGBD). The availability of dedicated lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for EUS-guided transluminal interventions contributed to the expansion of endoscopic therapies for acute cholecystitis, making endoscopic gallbladder drainage easier, faster, and hence more widely available. Moreover, EUS-GBD with LAMS opened the possibility of several cholecystoscopy-guided interventions, such as gallstone lithotripsy and clearance. Finally, EUS-GBD has also been proposed as a rescue drainage modality in malignant biliary obstruction after failure of standard techniques, with encouraging results. In this review, we will describe the TBGD and EUS-GBD techniques, and we will discuss the available data on clinical efficacy in different settings in comparison with PGBD. Finally, we will comment on the future perspectives of EUS-GBD, discussing the areas of uncertainty in which new data are more strongly awaited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the preferred treatment for acute cholecystitis (AC). However, the optimal timing for LC in AC management remains uncertain, with early cholecystectomy (EC) and interval cholecystectomy (IC) being two common approaches influenced by various factors.MethodsThis retrospective study, conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Karachi, Pakistan, aimed to compare the outcomes of EC vs. IC for AC management. Patient data from January 2019 to September 2019 were analyzed with a focus on operative complications, duration of surgery, and postoperative hospital stay. The inclusion criteria were based on the Tokyo Guidelines, and patients underwent LC within 3 days of symptom onset in the EC group and after 6 weeks in the IC group.ResultsAmong 147 eligible patients, 100 underwent LC (50 in each group). No significant differences were observed in the sex distribution or mean age between the two groups. The EC group experienced fewer operative complications (12%) than the IC group (34%), with statistically significant differences observed. Nevertheless, no substantial variations in operative time or postoperative hospital stay were observed between the groups.ConclusionReduced complications in the EC group underscore its safety and efficacy. Nonetheless, further validation through multicenter studies is essential to substantiate these findings.

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is required for acute cholecystitis patient with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD). However, it's unknown how to distinguishing the surgical difficulty for these patients. Methods: Data of patients who underwent LC after PTGBD between 2016 and 2022 were collected. Patients were categorized into difficult and non-difficult operations based on operative time, blood loss, and surgical conversion. Performance of prediction model was evaluated by ROC, calibration, and decision curves. Results: A total of 127 patients were analyzed, including 91 in non-difficult operation group and 36 in difficult operation group. Elevated CRP (P = 0.011), pericholecystic effusion (P

Background/Aims: There are no consensus guidelines for patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy who are unfit for interval cholecystectomy. The current study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic gallbladder drainage, i.e. conversion from percutaneous cholecystostomy (including endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage), and conservative treatment after percutaneous cholecystostomy tube removal. Methods : This retrospective review included patients who underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis between January 2017 and December 2020. Consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic gallbladder drainage or percutaneous cholecystostomy tube removal without interval cholecystectomy were included. Outcome measures included recurrent acute cholecystitis and unplanned readmission due to gallstone-related diseases. Results : During the study period, 238 patients were selected (63 underwent endoscopic gallbladder drainage conversion and 175 underwent conservative treatment). Patients who underwent endoscopic gallbladder drainage conversion had lower rates of recurrent acute cholecystitis (3 [4.76%] vs 31 [17.71%], p=0.012) and unplanned readmission due to gallstone-related diseases (6 [9.52%] vs 40 [22.86%], p=0.022) than those who underwent conservative treatment following percutaneous cholecystostomy tube removal. In the univariate and multivariate analyses, calculus cholecystitis (odds ratio, 13.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.83 to 102.83; p=0.011) and conversion of endoscopic gallbladder drainage (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.78; p=0.019) were significant predictive factors for recurrent acute cholecystitis. Conclusion : s: Endoscopic gallbladder drainage conversion led to more favorable outcomes than conservative treatment after percutaneous cholecystostomy tube removal. Therefore, endoscopic gallbladder drainage conversion may be considered a promising treatment option for patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy who are at a high surgical risk.

Abstract Introduction A textbook outcome patient is one in which the operative course passes uneventful, without complications, readmission or mortality. There is a lack of publications in terms of TO on acute cholecystitis. Objetive The objective of this study is to analyze the achievement of TO in patients with urgent early cholecystectomy (UEC) for Acute Cholecystitis. and to identify which factors are related to achieving TO. Materials and methods This is a post hoc study of the SPRiMACC study. It´s a prospective multicenter observational study run by WSES. The criteria to define TO in urgent early cholecystectomy (TOUEC) were no 30-day mortality, no 30-day postoperative complications, no readmission within 30 days, and hospital stay ≤ 7 days (75th percentile), and full laparoscopic surgery. Patients who met all these conditions were taken as presenting a TOUEC. Outcomes 1246 urgent early cholecystectomies for ACC were included. In all, 789 patients (63.3%) achieved all TOUEC parameters, while 457 (36.6%) failed to achieve one or more parameters and were considered non-TOUEC. The patients who achieved TOUEC were younger had significantly lower scores on all the risk scales analyzed. In the serological tests, TOUEC patients had lower values for in a lot of variables than non-TOUEC patients. The TOUEC group had lower rates of complicated cholecystitis. Considering operative time, a shorter duration was also associated with a higher probability of reaching TOUEC. Conclusion Knowledge of the factors that influence the TOUEC can allow us to improve our results in terms of textbook outcome.

Danping Shan, Qiyao Wang, Xiang Heng, Xiaoyan Wu Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Xiaoyan Wu; Xiang Heng, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, 1518 Huanchen North Road, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314000, People’s Republic of China, Email wxy87751@163.com; hx_227@sohu.comObjective: To investigate the dynamic fluctuations of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), and neutrophil counts in individuals diagnosed with acute cholecystitis. Additionally, the research seeks to investigate the potential clinical significance of these biomarkers in the early stages of acute cholecystitis.Methods: This retrospective cohort study included one hundred patients with acute cholecystitis (60 with mild acute cholecystitis and 40 with severe cholecystitis) admitted to our hospital between January 2022 and December 2022 were included. The levels of various cytokines, PCT and neutrophils in serum on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 were dynamically detected. The difference in each indicator between the two groups was analysed, and the diagnostic value of each indicator for acute cholecystitis was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Results: IL-6 and PCT levels and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in patients with moderate and severe cholecystitis than those in those with mild cholecystitis (P < 0.01). The AUC values for the three indicators were all greater than 60%, and the AUC value for the joint diagnosis of the three indicators reached 90%.Conclusion: Serum interleukin-6 combined with PCT and neutrophil count is helpful to determine the degree of disease development in patients with acute cholecystitis. The advantage of dynamic monitoring of the three indicators is that the detection is simple and worthy of clinical promotion.Keywords: serum interleukin-6, procalcitonin, PCT, neutrophil count, acute cholecystitis

Introduction: Gangrenous cholecystitis (GC) is a serious complication associated with cholecystitis and usually presents with greater mortality than uncomplicated cholecystitis. It may be associated with cholelithiasis or can be due to acalculous cholecystitis. Acalculous cholecystitis is usually associated with elderly age and or associated with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus (DM), coronary artery disease, and chronic debilitated bedridden patients. Since these patients are elderly, have other symptomatology of chronic illnesses, and usually suffer from peripheral neuropathy, the diagnosis can be missed in initial stages. We present here a case series of five patients with GC who presented in whom the diagnosis was missed initially and subsequent surgical intervention resulted in rapid recovery. Material and Methods: The aim of this study was to emphasize on the importance of keeping index of suspicion and early surgical intervention in such cases to prevent morbidity and mortality. Patients studied in this case series were initially admitted to the medical ward and surgical consult was sought later. Delay in seeking surgical consult ranged from 1 to 4 days. All of them underwent cross-sectional imaging in form of contrast-enhanced computed tomography abdomen and subsequent open cholecystectomy based on imaging findings of perforated gallbladder, intraoperatively these patients were found to have perforated gallbladder secondary to GC. Results: Out of the five patients studied, 3 (60%) were female and 2 (40%) were male, with a mean age of 64.5 (55–73) years. DM constitute most frequently accompanying medical issues (80%). Surgical site infection was seen as the most common postoperative complication. Longer delay time before diagnosis was determined as independent risk factor affecting morbidity and mortality.

Context: Acute cholecystitis (AC) is one of the most common afflictions of the gastrointestinal system presenting to hospitals whose delayed diagnosis can lead to severe complications. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a new and inexpensive predictor of severe AC that can be used as prognostic biomarker for the stratification of patients for appropriate management. Aims: The aims of the study are to determine the usefulness of the NLR as a prognostic marker and to find range that distinguishes between grades of AC and to compare NLR use with white blood cell, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and radiological modalities in the diagnosis of severe AC. Settings and Design: This is a 1-year prospective observational study in tertiary care center. Subjects and Methods: Demographic data, investigations, and management of 110 patients diagnosed with AC were collected. Categorization in mild, moderate, or severe AC group was based on Tokyo guidelines and NLR was calculated as absolute neutrophil count/absolute lymphocyte count. Statistical Analysis Used: One-way analysis of variance. Results: Sixty-four were male and 46 were female. 23.64% had severe AC, 30.91% had moderate, and 45.45% had mild AC. Mean hospital stay and intensive care unit stay were more in severe cholecystitis group. Diabetes mellitus was commonly associated comorbidity in severe cholecystitis (35.48%). As per the study, NLR ranges 10 in severe AC (sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 88%). The cardiovascular system was most commonly affected in severe AC, followed by renal derangement. Conclusions: NLR has proved to be a prognostic marker to determine disease severity in patients with AC which will help in appropriate management and better patient outcome.