Search

International audience

International audience

International audience; The objective was to study the effects of abomasal infusion of linseed oil, a source rich in n-3 C18:3, on whole-body response to insulin (experiment 1) and on insulin antilipolytic effects during feed restriction (experiment 2). In experiment 1, eight nonlactating, non-gestating cows were assigned to a crossover design, fed to meet maintenance requirements, and infused abomasally with either linseed oil (LIN) or tallow (TAL) at a rate of 0.54 g/kg of body weight per d for 5.5 d. Infusions were performed every 8 h during the first 3 d of each period and every 4 h thereafter. Intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTT) were performed on d 5 of each period, followed by i.v. insulin challenges (IC) 12 h later. In experiment 2, six nonlactating, nongestating cows were assigned to a replicated 3 x 3 Latin square design. The experimental protocol included a water (WTR) treatment and feeding was suspended on d 3, leading to 50 and 62 h of feed restriction before IVGTT and IC, respectively. Clearance of glucose during IVGTT and IC was not affected by treatments in either experiment. However, LIN had an insulin sensitizing effect in experiment 1, because a lower insulin concentration led to the same clearance of glucose as TAL. In experiment 1, plasma nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentration was low, reflecting a postprandial state, but NEFA was greater for LIN than TAL during IVGTT (108 vs. 88 {+/-} 4 {micro}Eq/L) and IC (133 vs. 83 {+/-} 9 {micro}Eq/L). In experiment 2, insulin concentrations during IVGTT did not differ across treatments. Basal plasma NEFA concentration before IVGTT tended to be greater for LIN than for TAL (612 vs. 508 {micro}Eq/L). Plasma NEFA clearance rate during IVGTT was greater for LIN than for TAL (2.8 vs. 2.5%/min), leading to a shorter time to reach half NEFA concentration (25 vs. 29 min) and greater absolute value of NEFA response area under the curve [AUC; 64,150 vs. 46,402 ({micro}Eq/L) x 180 min]. Data suggest that LIN enhanced the antilipolytic effects of insulin. Yet, other factors could have been involved because plasma NEFA concentration before IVGTT was 104 {micro}Eq/L greater for LIN than TAL for unknown reasons.

Because brain membranes contain large amounts of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n-3), and as (n-3) PUFA dietary deficiency can lead to impaired attention, learning, and memory performance in rodents, we have examined the influence of an (n-3) PUFA-deprived diet on the central cholinergic neurotransmission system. We have focused on several cholinergic neurochemical parameters in the frontal cortex and hippocampus of rats fed an (n-3) PUFA-deficient diet, compared with rats fed a control diet. The (n-3) PUFA deficiency resulted in changes in the membrane phospholipid compositions of both brain regions, with a dramatic loss (62–77%) of DHA. However, the cholinergic pathway was only modified in the hippocampus and not in the frontal cortex. The basal acetylcholine (ACh) release in the hippocampus of deficient rats was significantly (72%) higher than in controls, whereas the KCl-induced release was lower (34%). The (n-3) PUFA deprivation also caused a 10% reduction in muscarinic receptor binding. In contrast, acetylcholinesterase activity and the vesicular ACh transporter in both brain regions were unchanged. Thus, we evidenced that an (n-3) PUFA-deficient diet can affect cholinergic neurotransmission, probably via changes in the phospholipid PUFA composition.