Hesham Aldhalaan, Hana Akleh, Saeed Bohlega, Imaduddin Kanaan, Fathiya Al-Murshedi, Sarar Mohamed, Mohammed AlQuaiz, Mohammad Shagrani, Fahad A. Bashiri, Fowzan S. Alkuraya, Banan Al-Younes, Saif Alshahrani, Maha Alotaibi, Saeed Hassan, Amal Alqassmi, Farrukh Sheikh, Fahad I. Alsohaibani, Edward Cupler, Saad AlShahwan, Majid Alfadhel, Dalal K. Bubshait, Aziza Chedrawi, Hamad Al-Mojalli, Adila Al-Kindy, Amal Alhashem, Mohammad A. Al-Muhaizea, Shamshad Gulab, Khalid Alsaleem, Maisoon Almugbel, Dorota Monies, Faisal Abaalkhail, Ahmed S Alenizi, Suad Alyamani, Abeer Al-Saegh, Ayaz Shah, Dyala Jaroudi, Khalid S. Alqadi, Maha Alnemer, Tariq Faquih, Renad Albar, Khalid Al-Thihli, Heba Y. El Khashab, Sulaiman M. Al-Mayouf, Moayad El-Haj, Brian F. Meyer, Hasan Al-Dhekri, Ibraheem F. Abosoudah, Zuhair Rahbeeni, A. Al-Ghonaium, Alya Qari, Asma Akilan, Mohammed Al-Owain, Nabil Moghrabi, Hamoud Al-Mousa, Amira Oshi, Taghreed Shuaib, Maha Faden, M. Al-Sebayel, Maha Tulbah, Ali Al-Mehaidib, Shazia Subhani, Raashda A Sulaiman, Wesam Kurdi, Hisham Alkuraya, Abdulaziz Al-Saman, Abdullah Alshanbary, Saeed Al Tala, Mustafa A. Salih, Wajeeh Aldekhail, Mohamed El-Kalioby, Zeeshan Shah, Mohammed Zain Seidahmed, Zuhair N. Al-Hassnan, Yasser Sabr, Tahani Alqasim, Moeenaldeen Al-Sayed, Abdullah Alsonbul, Hussien Elsiesy, Rand Arnaout, Saad Alsaadoun, Muddathir H. Hamad, Brahim Tabarki, Sami Al-Hajjar, Randa Bassiouni, Maged H. Hussein, Dieter C. Broering, Soher Balkhy, Abdullah Tamim, Mohamed Abouelhoda, Talal Algoufi, Nawal Makhseed, Ewa Goljan, Turki M. Alkharfy, Talal A. Basha, Bandar K. Al Saud, Eissa Faqeih, Hamad Al-Zaidan, Laszlo Szonyi, Husam R. Kayyali, Habiba Sultana, Suzan Alhomadi, Hadeel Elbardisy, Omar Dabbagh, Wafa Eyaid, Fuad Al Mutairi, Sameena Khan, and Mohamed Ibrahim Khalil
In this study, we report the experience of the only reference clinical next-generation sequencing lab in Saudi Arabia with the first 1000 families who span a wide-range of suspected Mendelian phenotypes. A total of 1019 tests were performed in the period of March 2016–December 2016 comprising 972 solo (index only), 14 duo (parents or affected siblings only), and 33 trio (index and parents). Multigene panels accounted for 672 tests, while whole exome sequencing (WES) represented the remaining 347 tests. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants that explain the clinical indications were identified in 34% (27% in panels and 43% in exomes), spanning 279 genes and including 165 novel variants. While recessive mutations dominated the landscape of solved cases (71% of mutations, and 97% of which are homozygous), a substantial minority (27%) were solved on the basis of dominant mutations. The highly consanguineous nature of the study population also facilitated homozygosity for many private mutations (only 32.5% of the recessive mutations are founder), as well as the first instances of recessive inheritance of previously assumed strictly dominant disorders (involving ITPR1, VAMP1, MCTP2, and TBP). Surprisingly, however, dual molecular diagnosis was only observed in 1.5% of cases. Finally, we have encountered candidate variants in 75 genes (ABHD6, ACY3, ADGRB2, ADGRG7, AGTPBP1, AHNAK2, AKAP6, ASB3, ATXN1L, C17orf62, CABP1, CCDC186, CCP110, CLSTN2, CNTN3, CNTN5, CTNNA2, CWC22, DMAP1, DMKN, DMXL1, DSCAM, DVL2, ECI1, EP400, EPB41L5, FBXL22, GAP43, GEMIN7, GIT1, GRIK4, GRSF1, GTRP1, HID1, IFNL1, KCNC4, LRRC52, MAP7D3, MCTP2, MED26, MPP7, MRPS35, MTDH, MTMR9, NECAP2, NPAT, NRAP, PAX7, PCNX, PLCH2, PLEKHF1, PTPN12, QKI, RILPL2, RIMKLA, RIMS2, RNF213, ROBO1, SEC16A, SIAH1, SIRT2, SLAIN2, SLC22A20, SMDT1, SRRT, SSTR1, ST20, SYT9, TSPAN6, UBR4, VAMP4, VPS36, WDR59, WDYHV1, and WHSC1) not previously linked to human phenotypes and these are presented to accelerate post-publication matchmaking. Two of these genes were independently mutated in more than one family with similar phenotypes, which substantiates their link to human disease (AKAP6 in intellectual disability and UBR4 in early dementia). If the novel candidate disease genes in this cohort are independently confirmed, the yield of WES will have increased to 83%, which suggests that most “negative” clinical exome tests are unsolved due to interpretation rather than technical limitations. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00439-017-1821-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.