Search

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise for evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) on computed tomography (CT). Accurately determining cancer invasiveness can guide treatment. We aimed to investigate quantitative CT parameters for invasiveness prediction., Methods: Patients with stage 0-IB NSCLC after surgical resection were retrospectively analysed. Preoperative CTs were evaluated with specialized software for nodule segmentation and CT quantification. Pathology was the reference for invasiveness. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression assessed predictors of high-risk SPN., Results: Three hundred and fifty-five SPN were included. On multivariate analysis, CT value mean and nodule type (ground glass opacity vs. solid) were independent predictors of high-risk SPN. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.811 for identifying high-risk nodules., Conclusions: Quantitative CT measures and nodule type correlated with invasiveness. Software-based CT assessment shows potential for noninvasive prediction to guide extent of resection. Further prospective validation is needed, including comparison with benign nodules.

Background: Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has been increasingly applied to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the comparison between robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in the feasibility and oncological efficacy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is scarce. This study aims to assess the superiorities of RATS over (VATS) concerning short-term outcomes in treating NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy., Methods: NSCLC patients receiving RATS or VATS lobectomy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2019 to 2022 were retrospectively identified. Baseline clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival profiles were analyzed., Results: Forty-six NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were included and divided into the RATS (n=15) and VATS (n=31) groups. The baseline clinical characteristics and induction-related adverse events were comparable between the two groups (all p>0.050). The 30-day mortality in the RATS and VATS groups were 0% and 3.23%, respectively (p=1.000). Patients undergoing RATS were associated with reduced surgical-related intensive unit care (ICU) stay than those receiving VATS (0.0 [0.0-0.0] vs. 0.0 [0.0-1.0] days, p=0.026). Moreover, RATS assessed more N1 LNs (6.27 ± 1.94 vs 4.90 ± 1.92, p=0.042) and LN stations (3.07 ± 1.03 vs 2.52 ± 0.57, p=0.038) compared with VATS. By comparison, no difference was found in surgical outcomes, pathological results, and postoperative complications between the RATS and VATS groups (all p>0.050). Finally, RATS and VATS achieved comparable one-year recurrence-free survival (82.96% vs. 85.23%, p=0.821) and the timing of central nervous system, LN, and bone recurrences (all p>0.050)., Conclusion: RATS is safe and feasible for NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, reducing surgical-related ICU stay, assessing increased N1 LNs and stations, and achieving similar survival profiles to VATS., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer RJ declared a shared affiliation with the authors to the handling editor at time of review., (Copyright © 2023 Pan, Zou, Tian, Zhu, Zhang, Jin, Gu, Ning, Li, Kong, Jiang, Huang and Luo.)