Search

Your search keyword '"Zou, G.Y."' showing total 17 results
Start Over Author "Zou, G.Y."
17 results on '"Zou, G.Y."'

2. Development and Validation of a Scoring System to Predict Outcomes of Vedolizumab Treatment in Patients With Crohn’s Disease

Author

Dulai, Parambir S., Boland, Brigid S., Singh, Siddharth, Chaudrey, Khadija, Koliani-Pace, Jenna L., Kochhar, Gursimran, Parikh, Malav P., Shmidt, Eugenia, Hartke, Justin, Chilukuri, Prianka, Meserve, Joseph, Whitehead, Diana, Hirten, Robert, Winters, Adam C., Katta, Leah G., Peerani, Farhad, Narula, Neeraj, Sultan, Keith, Swaminath, Arun, Bohm, Matthew, Lukin, Dana, Hudesman, David, Chang, John T., Rivera-Nieves, Jesus, Jairath, Vipul, Zou, G.Y., Feagan, Brian G., Shen, Bo, Siegel, Corey A., Loftus, Edward V., Jr., Kane, Sunanda, Sands, Bruce E., Colombel, Jean-Frederic, Sandborn, William J., Lasch, Karen, and Cao, Charlie

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Protocol for the Brain Health Support Program Study of the Canadian Therapeutic Platform Trial for Multidomain Interventions to Prevent Dementia (CAN-THUMBS UP): A Prospective 12-Month Intervention Study

Author

Feldman, H.H., primary, Belleville, S., additional, Nygaard, H.B., additional, Montero-Odasso, M., additional, Durant, J., additional, Lupo, J.-L., additional, Revta, C., additional, Chan, S., additional, Cuesta, M., additional, Slack, P.J., additional, Winer, S., additional, Brewster, P.W.H., additional, Hofer, S.M., additional, Lim, A., additional, Centen, A., additional, Jacobs, D.M., additional, Anderson, N.D., additional, Walker, J.D., additional, Speechley, M.R., additional, Zou, G.Y., additional, and Chertkow, H., additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA) - An extension of the STROBE statement

Author

Little, J. (Julian), Higgins, J.P.T. (Julian), Ioannidis, J.P.A. (John), Moher, D. (David), Gagnon, F. (France), Elm, E. (Erik) von, Khoury, M.J. (Muin Joseph), Cohen, B. (Barbara), Davey-Smith, G. (George), Grimshaw, J. (Jeremy), Scheet, P. (Paul), Gwinn, M. (Marta), Williamson, R.E. (Robin), Zou, G.Y. (Guang Yong), Hutchings, K. (Kim), Johnson, C.Y. (Candice), Tait, V. (Valerie), Wiens, M. (Miriam), Golding, J. (Jean), Duijn, C.M. (Cornelia) van, McLaughlin, J. (John), Paterson, A.D. (Andrew), Wells, G.A. (George), Fortier, I. (Isabel), Freedman, M. (Matthew), Zecevic, M. (Maja), King, R. (Richard), Infante-Rivard, C. (Claire), Stewart, A.F.R. (Alexandre), Birkett, N. (Nick), Little, J. (Julian), Higgins, J.P.T. (Julian), Ioannidis, J.P.A. (John), Moher, D. (David), Gagnon, F. (France), Elm, E. (Erik) von, Khoury, M.J. (Muin Joseph), Cohen, B. (Barbara), Davey-Smith, G. (George), Grimshaw, J. (Jeremy), Scheet, P. (Paul), Gwinn, M. (Marta), Williamson, R.E. (Robin), Zou, G.Y. (Guang Yong), Hutchings, K. (Kim), Johnson, C.Y. (Candice), Tait, V. (Valerie), Wiens, M. (Miriam), Golding, J. (Jean), Duijn, C.M. (Cornelia) van, McLaughlin, J. (John), Paterson, A.D. (Andrew), Wells, G.A. (George), Fortier, I. (Isabel), Freedman, M. (Matthew), Zecevic, M. (Maja), King, R. (Richard), Infante-Rivard, C. (Claire), Stewart, A.F.R. (Alexandre), and Birkett, N. (Nick)

Abstract

Making sense of rapidly evolving evidence on genetic associations is crucial to making genuine advances in human genomics and the eventual integration of this information in the practice of medicine and public health. Assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of this evidence, and hence the ability to synthesize it, has been limited by inadequate reporting of results. The STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA) initiative builds on the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement and provides additions to 12 of the 22 items on the STROBE checklist. The additions concern population stratification, genotyping errors, modelling haplotype variation, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, replication, selection of participants, rationale for choice of genes and variants, treatment effects in studying quantitative traits, statistical methods, relatedness, reporting of descriptive and outcome data and the volume of data issues that are important to consider in genetic association studies. The STREGA recommendations do not prescribe or dictate how a genetic association study should be designed, but seek to enhance the transparency of its reporting, regardless of choices made during design, conduct or analysis.

Published
2009
Full Text
View/download PDF

16. Confidence Interval Estimation for a Difference between Two Dependent Intraclass Correlation Coefficients with Variable Class Sizes

Author

Kowalik, Danuta, Choi, Yun-Hee, and Zou, G.Y.

Abstract

AbstractFour confidence intervals for a difference between two dependent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) are developed, focusing on applications to family studies. The basic idea adopted here is that confidence intervals for a difference between two parameters can be obtained from confidence limits for each parameter. Among the four confidence procedures considered, the one based on the inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation for a single ICC performed best. Francis Galton's data on human stature are used to illustrate the methodology.

Published
2011
Full Text
View/download PDF

17. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration

Author

Vandenbroucke, J. P., von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., Egger, M., Blettner, M., Boffetta, P., Brenner, H., Chêne, G., Cooper, C., Davey-Smith, G., Gagnon, F., Greenland, P., Greenland, S., Infante-Rivard, C., Ioannidis, J., James, A., Jones, G., Ledergerber, B., Little, J., May, M., Moher, D., Momen, H., Morabia, A., Morgenstern, H., Paccaud, F., Röösli, M., Rothenbacher, D., Rothman, K., Sabin, C., Sauerbrei, W., Say, L., Sterne, J., Syddall, H., White, I., Wieland, S., Williams, H., Zou, G. Y., STROBE Initiative, Altman, DG., Blettner, M., Boffetta, P., Brenner, H., Chêne£££Genevie've£££ G., Cooper, C., Davey-Smith, G., von Elm, E., Egger, M., Gagnon, F., Gøtzsche, PC., Greenland, P., Greenland, S., Infante-Rivard, C., Ioannidis, J., James, A., Jones, G., Ledergerber, B., Little, J., May, M., Moher, D., Momen, H., Morabia, A., Morgenstern, H., Mulrow, CD., Paccaud, F., Pocock, SJ., Poole, C., Rö ö sli, M., Rothenbacher, D., Rothman, K., Sabin, C., Sauerbrei, W., Say, L., Schlesselman, JJ., Sterne, J., Syddall, H., Vandenbroucke, JP., White, I., Wieland, S., Williams, H., Zou, GY., Vandenbroucke, J.P., Altman, D.G., Gøtzsche, P.C., Mulrow, C.D., Pocock, S.J., Schlesselman, J.J., Chêne, G., Röösli, M., and Zou, G.Y.

Subjects
Research Report, Biomedical Research, Cross-sectional study, Science Policy, Epidemiology, Applied psychology, Public Health and Epidemiology, Editorial policies (including conflicts of interest), 610 Medicine & health, Guidelines as Topic, Observation, Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology, computer.software_genre, Cohort Studies, Empirical research, 360 Social problems & social services, Research Methods, Internal Medicine, Medicine, Generalizability theory, Publishing, business.industry, Clinical study design, General Medicine, Checklist, Observational Studies as Topic, Critical appraisal, Epidemiologic Studies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Research Design, Case-Control Studies, Epidemiologic Research Design, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery, Observational study, Data mining, Psychology, business, computer, reporting of observational studies, Research Article
Abstract

Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research., In this explanatory and elaboration document Mattias Egger and colleagues provide the meaning and rationale of each checklist item on the STROBE Statement.

Published
2007
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results