1. Comparison between the Framingham and prospective cardiovascular of Münster scores for risk assessment of coronary heart disease in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients in Pernambuco, Brazil
- Author
-
Maria de Fátima Pessoa Militão de Albuquerque, Thais Gelenske, Ricardo Arraes de Alencar Ximenes, Demócrito de Barros Miranda-Filho, Heloísa Ramos Lacerda de Melo, George Tadeu Nunes Diniz, Zoraya de Medeiros Barros, Érico Higino de Carvalho, and Francisco Bandeira
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Multivariate analysis ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Population ,Coronary Disease ,Risk Assessment ,Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena ,Cohort Studies ,Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) ,Internal medicine ,HIV Seropositivity ,Internal Medicine ,medicine ,Prevalence ,Humans ,education ,education.field_of_study ,Framingham Risk Score ,business.industry ,Univariate ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Clinical research ,Blood pressure ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Research Design ,Immunology ,HIV-1 ,Female ,Risk assessment ,business ,Algorithms ,Brazil - Abstract
The Framingham score is used in most studies on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients to estimate the risk for coronary heart disease; however, it may have some limitations for detecting risk among these individuals.The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between the Framingham and Prospective Cardiovascular of Münster (PROCAM) scores among HIV-positive individuals and to investigate the factors associated with disagreement between the two scores.A cross-sectional study was conducted in a population of HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients attending the outpatient's clinics of two reference centers for HIV/AIDS in Pernambuco, Brazil. Agreement between the Framingham and PROCAM scores was evaluated using the kappa index. From this analysis, a variable called "disagreement between scores" was created, and univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to investigate the factors associated with this variable.The prevalence of low, moderate, and high risk were, respectively, 78.7%, 13.5%, and 7.8% by Framingham score and 88.5%, 4.3%, and 7.2% by PROCAM (kappa = 0.64, P ≤ 0.0001). Agreement in the subgroup with metabolic syndrome by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) (kappa = 0.51, P ≤ 0.0001) and the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) (kappa = 0.59, P ≤ 0.0001) criteria was moderate. The Framingham score identified greater proportion of women with moderate risk. Factors independently associated with disagreement were: smoking, sex, age, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diastolic blood pressure, and metabolic syndrome.There was a good agreement between the Framingham and PROCAM scores in HIV-positive patients, but a higher proportion of moderate-high risk was identified by the Framingham score. This disagreement should be evaluated in cohort studies to observe clinical outcomes over the course of time.
- Published
- 2010