Search

Primary lymph node gastrinoma has been defined as gastrin-producing tumor present in lymph nodes and predominantly found in well-defined anatomical region known as gastrinoma triangle. They are usually localized preoperatively with imaging, and their surgical resection results in long-term relief. The authors report a case of unresectable primary lymph nodal gastrinoma with liver metastases in a 14-year-old adolescent boy with proven histopathology detected on Ga-DOTANOC whole-body PET/CT scan followed by preoperative multiple Lu-DOTATATE cycles for cytoreduction. Subsequent surgical resection of residual mass resulted in complete response with a follow-up of around 4 years in this unusual case of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

Objective: To determine the role of reoperation in patients with persistent or recurrent Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome (ZES)., Background: Approximately, 0% to 60% of ZES patients are disease-free (DF) after an initial operation, but the tumor may recur., Methods: A prospective database was queried., Results: A total of 223 patients had an initial operation for possible cure of ZES and then were subsequently evaluated serially with cross sectional imaging-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, more recently octreoscan-and functional studies for ZES activity. The mean age at first surgery was 49 years and with an 11-year mean follow-up 52 patients (23%) underwent reoperation when ZES recurred with imageable disease. Results in this group are analyzed in the current report. Reoperation occurred on a mean of 6 years after the initial surgery with a mean number of reoperations of 1 (range 1-5). After reoperation 18/52 patients were initially DF (35%); and after a mean follow-up of 8 years, 13/52 remained DF (25%). During follow-up, 9/52 reoperated patients (17%) died, of whom 7 patients died a disease-related death (13%). The overall survival from first surgery was 84% at 20 years and 68% at 30 years. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 status did not affect survival, but DF interval and liver metastases did., Conclusions: These results demonstrate that a significant proportion of patients with ZES will develop resectable persistent or recurrent disease after an initial operation. These patients generally have prolonged survival after reoperation and 25% can be cured with repeat surgery, suggesting all ZES patients postresection should have systematic imaging, and if tumor recurs, advise repeat operation.

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) results from an ectopic gastrin-secreting tumor leading to peptic ulcer disease, reflux, and chronic diarrhea. While early recognition portends an excellent prognosis with >80% survival at 15 years, symptoms are often nonspecific making the diagnosis difficult to establish. Diagnosis involves a series of tests, including fasting gastrin, gastric pH, chromogranin A, and secretin stimulation. Performing these tests in the correct sequence and at the proper time is essential to avoid inaccurate results. Tumor localization is equally nuanced. Although providers have classically used 111 indium-radiolabeled octreotide with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy to evaluate tumor size and metastases, recent studies have shown superior results with newer imaging modalities. In particular, 68 gallium ( 68 Ga)-labeled somatostatin radiotracers (i.e., 68 Ga-DOTATOC, 68 Ga-DOTANOC and 68 Ga-DOTATATE) used with positron emission tomography/computed tomography can provide excellent results. Endoscopic ultrasound is another useful modality, particularly in patients with ZES in the setting of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. This review aims to provide clinicians with an overview of ZES with a focus on both clinical presentation and the proper utilization of the various biochemical and imaging tests available.

Background: Surgical management of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) relies on localization and resection of all tumor foci. We describe the benefit of combined intraoperative use of a portable large field of view gamma camera (LFOVGC) and a handheld gamma detection probe (HGDP) for indium-111 ((111)In)-pentetreotide radioguided localization and confirmation of gastrinoma resection in ZES., Study Design: Five patients (6 cases) with (111)In-pentetreotide-avid ZES were evaluated. Patients were injected with (111)In-pentetreotide for diagnostic imaging the day before surgery. Intraoperatively, an HGDP and LFOVGC were used to localize (111)In-pentetreotide-avid lesions, guide resection, assess specimens for (111)In-pentetreotide activity, and to verify lack of abnormal post-resection surgical field activity., Results: Large field of view gamma camera imaging and HGDP-assisted detection were helpful for localization and guided resection of tumor and removal of (111)In-pentetreotide-avid tumor foci in all cases. In 3 of 5 patients (3 of 6 cases), these techniques led to detection and resection of additional tumor foci beyond those detected by standard surgical techniques. The (111)In-pentetreotide-positive or-negative specimens correlated with neuroendocrine tumors or benign pathology, respectively. In one patient with mild residual focal activity on post-resection portable LFOVGC imaging, thought to be artifact, had recurrence of disease in the same area 5 months after surgery., Conclusions: Real-time LFOVGC imaging and HGDP use for surgical management of gastrinoma improve success of localizing and resecting all neuroendocrine tumor-positive tumor foci, providing instantaneous navigational feedback. This approach holds potential for improving long-term patient outcomes in patients with ZES., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Context: Gastric neuroendocrine tumors are rare neoplasms that originate from gastric enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells in the oxyntic mucosa. Gastrin and its derivates have been reported to regulate epithelial cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation. Mutations in the epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) gene have been shown to be associated with the occurrence of diffuse gastric carcinomas in affected families., Objective: In this study we investigated the histopathological and molecular findings in the gastrointestinal wall of a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 with malignant duodenal gastrinoma and multiple gastric ECL cell tumors, who additionally developed a signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach., Design and Patient: Biopsies from the gastrointestinal tract of a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 were immunostained for vesicular monoamine transporter-2 and E-cadherin. Nonamidated gastrin products were measured in the serum of the patient using antibodies that react with progastrin, Gly-extended, and amidated gastrins. Genetic analyses were performed to exclude germ-line mutations within the E-cadherin gene., Results: Immunohistochemical studies of gastric ECL cell tumors showed a largely diminished E-cadherin expression in comparison to gastric surface mucosa cells and a loss of E-cadherin expression in the cells of the signet-ring carcinoma. Detailed biochemical measurements revealed progastrin concentrations that were approximately 20%, and Gly-gastrin concentrations that were approximately 10% the amidated gastrin concentrations in plasma. Molecular analyses revealed no E-cadherin germ-line mutation., Conclusion: Our immunohistochemical studies might suggest that the gastrinoma-associated excessive progastrin tissue concentrations led to diminished expression of E-cadherin within the gastric mucosa and promoted tumor development of a signet-ring cell carcinoma.

In 1970-2005 yrs. 65 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome were observed and operated on in the clinic. The decisive meaning in diagnosis owes radioimmunological determination of gastrin level in the blood and its changes while conduction of tests with calcium and secretin. Surgical tactics was determined by localization, number and character of gastrinomas. During the first period of work gastrectomy with complete excision of gastrinproducing tumor constituted the operation of choice. Implementation of intraoperative method of ultrasonography have permitted to excise the benign gastrinoma when her localization was favourable with preservation of stomach. Minimal life span after gastrectomy, performed for nonresectable malignant gastrinoma, have constituted 9 years.

Unlabelled: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of a new somatostatin analog, 99mTc-P829, compared with that of 111In-pentetreotide., Methods: Forty-three patients (32 men, 11 women; age range, 24-78 y; mean age, 56 y) with biologically or histologically proven neuroendocrine tumors were prospectively included: 11 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, 16 patients with carcinoid tumors, and 16 patients with other types of functioning (n = 6) or nonfunctioning (n = 10) endocrine tumors. 111In-Pentetreotide planar images (head, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were obtained 4 and 24 h after injection of 10 microg somatostatin analog labeled with 148 +/- 17 MBq 111In, and SPECT was performed 24 h after injection. Similar (99m)Tc-P829 planar images were obtained at 1, 4-6, and 24 h after injection of 50 microg peptide labeled with 991.6 +/- 187.59 MBq 99mTc. Abdominal SPECT was performed 4-6 h after injection., Results: 111In-Pentetreotide detected 203 tumoral sites in 39 (91%) of 43 patients, whereas 99mTc-P829 detected 77 sites in 28 (65%) of 43 patients (P < 0.005). In the liver, 129 sites (in 24 patients) were detected by 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy and 34 sites (in 10 patients) were detected by 99mTc-P829 scintigraphy., Conclusion: In patients with endocrine tumors, the detection rate of 99mTc-P829 scintigraphy was lower than that of 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy, which appeared to be more sensitive, especially for liver metastases.

The natural history of pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) in patients with MEN1 is largely unknown. Recent studies in patients with sporadic PETs show that in a subset, tumor growth is aggressive. To determine whether PETs in patients with MEN1 show similar growth behavior, we report results from a long-term prospective study of 57 patients with MEN1 and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. All patients had tumor imaging studies yearly, and the mean follow-up was 8 yr. Only patients with PETs 2.5 cm or larger underwent abdominal surgical exploration. Hepatic metastases occurred in 23%, and in 14% tumors demonstrated aggressive growth. Three tumor-related deaths occurred, each due to liver metastases, and in each, aggressive tumor growth was present. Overall, 4% of the study group, 23% with liver metastases and 38% with aggressive disease, died. Aggressive growth was associated with higher gastrins and larger tumors. Patients with liver metastases with aggressive growth differed from those with liver metastases without aggressive growth in age at MEN1 onset or diagnosis and primary tumor size. Survival was decreased (P = 0.0012) in patients with aggressive tumor growth compared with those with liver metastases without aggressive growth or with no liver metastases without aggressive growth. Based on these results a number of factors were identified that may be clinically useful in determining in which patients aggressive tumor growth may occur. These results demonstrate in a significant subset of patients with MEN1 and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, aggressive tumor growth occurs and can lead to decreased survival. The identification of prognostic factors that identify this group will be important clinically in allowing more aggressive treatment options to be instituted earlier.

Spontaneous perforation of the esophagus is a rare manifestation of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). Failure to recognize its existence can lead to an unsuccessful treatment of the esophageal perforation. We present a rare case of reflux esophagitis-induced esophageal perforation in a patient with ZES. Presence of a gastrinoma should be considered when recurrent or complicated reflux esophagitis is encountered.

Gastrinomas are uncommon tumors which are difficult to locate. They are often located in the head of the pancreas. About two-thirds of them are malignant, their growth is slow and they usually metastasize in the liver. In about 25% of cases, the Zollinger-Ellison (Z-E) syndrome is included in the multiple endocrine neoplasm type 1 syndrome (MEN 1).A 14-year old male patient presenting an episode of abdominal perforation which required emergency surgery is reported. The abdominal ultrasonography, CT scan and magnetic resonance revealed a single lesion in the left liver lobe, suggesting metastasis. Significantly increased levels of serum gastrin suggested a diagnosis of Z-E syndrome. A study with 111In-octreotide was required to locate the primary tumor and evaluate its extent. The scintigraphy showed only one abnormal uptake focus in the left liver lobe. Post-surgery scintigraphy studies revealed the presence of metastatic adenopathies which were removed after a second surgery. No pathologic findings were observed in the last nuclear medicine study. The somatostatin receptor scintigraphy is the most sensitive method to locate primary gastrinomas and to assess the tumoral dissemination in patients with Z-E Syndrome.

Objective: Our purpose is to describe associated and coexistent diseases of gastric carcinoid tumors, the unique biologic behavior of these tumors, the appearance of these tumors on fluoroscopic and CT images, and the radiologic management of these neoplasms., Conclusion: First, multiple gastric carcinoid tumors are associated with enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia, chronic atrophic gastritis, and pernicious anemia and have a low risk of malignancy. Second, solitary gastric carcinoid tumors, or gastric carcinoid tumors associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia-type I (MEN-I) and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, have a higher potential for metastatic disease. Third, the radiologic appearance and management of these tumors depend on the clinical background of the patient.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the pancreas are distinguished in functional (85%) and non functional (15%) in relation to the production and release of the hormone produced. Functional tumors show early, because the neoplasm release the hormone produced when they are still small. Non functional tumors show late when the tumor grows. The localization and the evaluation of the extensive of these tumors has come fundamentally important both in correct presurgical detection and also in the diagnosis of metastases which excluded surgery. Also, as the survival of 20% of the patients with metastases is only five years, the use of non-invasive imaging techniques is very important for the evaluation of results of the various therapies (chemotherapy, interferon, somatostatin). Recent studies have shown that in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, SRS is the most sensitive non invasive method in localizing primitive tumors and metastases. The accuracy of this technique has not yet been provided in the study of tumors like insulinomas which do not have a high percentage of somatostatine receptors on their cell membranes. The sensitivity obtained in recent studies on a large number of patient and the low cost, lower than all the other imaging technique in use today, surely make SRS the first choice in the study of NET. Where SRS is negative and surgery is possible, Spiral CT or better still MRI is the best tool to check the results of chemotherapy in patients with hepatic metastases (already detected by SRS), because it is easier to compare the changes in size and morphology of metastases.

Unlabelled: Gastric carcinoids are of increasing clinical concern because they may develop in hypergastrinemic states, especially with the increased chronic use of potent acid suppressants that can cause hypergastrinemia. However, gastric carcinoids are difficult to diagnose. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) has a high sensitivity and specificity for localizing carcinoids in other locations. The purpose of this study was to determine whether SRS could localize gastric carcinoids., Methods: Two groups of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) with hypergastrinemia, each having a different increased risk of developing gastric carcinoids, were studied. One hundred sixty-two consecutive patients with ZES were studied prospectively, with 39 having multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 1 (MEN-1) (high increased risk), and 123 not having MEN-1 (low increased risk). Patients were admitted to the hospital initially and then yearly, undergoing SRS with SPECT, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and Jumbo Cup biopsies of any gastric abnormalities, as well as random biopsies of the gastric body. Tumor localization studies were also performed. Both the results of the routine SRS interpretation and the results of a masked review, with particular attention to the stomach of high risk MEN-1 patients, were correlated with the gastric biopsy results., Results: Gastric SRS localization was positive in 19 (12%) of 162 patients. Sixteen patients had a gastric carcinoid, and 12 of these patients had SRS localization. The sensitivity of SRS in localizing a gastric carcinoid was 75%, with a specificity of 95%. Positive and negative predictive values were 63% and 97%, respectively., Conclusion: SRS is a noninvasive method that can identify patients with gastric carcinoids with a reasonable sensitivity and a high specificity. SRS should prove useful in the treatment of patients with hypergastrinemic states that have an increased incidence of gastric carcinoids. In patients with MEN-1, one must realize that localization in the upper abdomen on SRS may be caused by a gastric carcinoid and not a pancreatic endocrine tumor.

Our preliminary experience of Somatostatin Receptor Positive Tumour Scintigraphy (SRPTS) in the management of some rare neuroendocrine tumours is highlighted. Six patients were evaluated using SRPTS. A single patient each with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, recurrent medullary carcinoma of thyroid and Stage IV neuroblastoma. Two patients with phaeochromocytoma, and one patient with suspected insulinoma were evaluated. SRPTS was useful in three of the six patients studied i.e. patient with gastrinoma, recurrent medullary carcinoma of thyroid and metastatic neuroblastoma. SRPTS although expensive is a useful and cost-effective approach of rare endocrine tumours and it role as a first line tool in the diagnosis is discussed.

Unlabelled: Scintigraphy with somatostatin analogs is a sensitive method for the staging and therapeutic management of patients with endocrine gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tumors. The aim of this study was to compare prospectively somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) using 111n-pentetreotide with bone scintigraphy using 99mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate for the detection of bone metastases., Methods: One-hundred-forty-five patients with proven endocrine GEP tumors were investigated. Patients were classified according to the presence of bone metastases as indicated by CT, MRI or histologic data. Group I included 19 patients with confirmed bone metastases, and group II included 126 patients without bone metastases., Results: In group I, SRS was positive in all 19 patients with bone metastases, and bone scintigraphy was positive in 17 patients. Bone metastases were found to occur predominantly in patients with liver metastases. In group 11, 5 patients had recent bone surgery for fracture or arthritis. SRS showed bone uptake in 4 of these patients, and bone scanning showed abnormal uptake in 5. In 7 of the remaining 121 group II patients, SRS was negative and bone scanning showed abnormal bone uptake suggesting bone metastases. The detection of bone metastases was of major prognostic value, because 42% of group 1 patients died during a 2-y follow-up., Conclusion: In patients with GEP tumors, the accuracy of SRS appears to be similar to that of bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases.

Objective: To study the experience of diagnosis and treatment of gastrinoma., Methods: A retrospective study of 17 patients with gastrinoma seen from 1978 through 1998 in PUMC hospital., Results: Three of the 17 cases were associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I (MEN-I) syndrome. Tumors dispersed extensively in pancreas (31%), duodenum (25%), lymphnode (19%) and other place (25%). Ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) were sensitive in localizing tumor in pancreas and liver, but were not so well for small tumor in duodenum and lymph node. The angiography, percutaneous transhepatic portal sampling (PTPS), scintigraphy and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) also can be used. Sixteen of 17 patients underwent 38 operations and 56 percent of the 16 cases underwent several operations. Seven patients at last performed total gastrectomy that was still considered as a choice of treatment. Tumor resection was rare because the advancing of tumor in most cases., Conclusions: Diagnosing gastrinoma in its early stage and striving for the tumor resection and reducing the metastasis of liver were the cruxes for good prognosis.

Unlabelled: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) is being increasingly used both for localization and, in some cases, diagnosis of various diseases. There are no prospective studies of its specificity or occurrence of false-positive results and their effects on management. This study was designed to address both of these issues., Methods: Over a 40-mo period, 146 consecutive patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) undergoing 480 SRS examinations were studied prospectively. Patients were admitted at least yearly and underwent SRS as well as conventional imaging studies (ultrasonography, CT, MRI) and angiography, if necessary. All admissions were assigned to one of five different clinical categories in which imaging studies had different purposes. SRS localizations were classified as true-positive or false-positive based on preset criteria. A false-positive result was determined to change clinical management based on five preset criteria., Results: Of all SRS examinations, 12% resulted in a false-positive localization for a neuroendocrine tumor or its metastases, resulting in a sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 86% and positive and negative predictive values of 85% and 52%, respectively. Extra-abdominal false-positive localizations (2/3) were more common than intra-abdominal (1/3). Thyroid disease, breast disease and granulomatosis lung disease were the most frequent causes of extra-abdominal false-positive localizations. Accessory spleens, localization to previous operative sites, renal parapelvic cysts and various procedural aspects were the most frequent causes of intra-abdominal false-positive localizations. Of all SRS studies, 2.7% resulted in a false-positive result that altered management., Conclusion: False-positive SRS localization occurs in 1 of 10 patients with ZES. By having a thorough understanding of diseases or circumstances that result in false-positive localization and comparing the SRS result with the clinical context, the percentage of patients in whom false-positive localization results in altered management can be reduced to below 3% and the correct diagnosis made in almost every case.

Gastrinomas secrete gastrin and cause symptoms related to gastric acid hypersecretion that can be controlled by antisecretory medications. Primary tumors are located within the pancreas or duodenum and 60% metastasize. Liver metastases are associated with decreased survival. Localization studies especially somatostatin receptor scintigraphy are indicated to image the extent of disease. Surgery is indicated to potentially cure the patient, or control the malignant tumoral process and prolong survival.

Objective: To determine the relative abilities of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) and conventional imaging studies (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, angiography) to localize gastrinomas before surgery in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) subsequently found at surgery, and to determine the effect of SRS on the disease-free rate., Summary Background Data: Recent studies demonstrate that SRS is the most sensitive imaging modality for localizing neuroendocrine tumors such as gastrinomas. Because of conflicting results in small series, it is unclear in ZES whether SRS will alter the disease-free rate, which gastrinomas are not detected, what factors contribute to failure to detect a gastrinoma, or whether the SRS result should be used to determine operability in patients without hepatic metastases, as recently recommended by some investigators., Methods: Thirty-five consecutive patients with ZES undergoing 37 exploratory laparotomies for possible cure were prospectively studied. All had SRS and conventional imaging studies before surgery. Imaging results were determined by an independent investigator depending on surgical findings. All patients underwent an identical surgical protocol (palpation after an extensive Kocher maneuver, ultrasound during surgery, duodenal transillumination, and 3 cm duodenotomy) and postoperative assessment of disease status (fasting gastrin, secretin test imaging within 2 weeks, at 3 to 6 months, and yearly), as used in pre-SRS studies previously., Results: Gastrinomas were detected in all patients at each surgery. Seventy-four gastrinomas were found: 22 duodenal, 8 pancreatic, 3 primaries in other sites, and 41 lymph node metastases. The relative detection order on a per-patient or per-lesion basis was SRS > angiography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography > ultrasound. On a per-lesion basis, SRS had greater sensitivity than all conventional studies combined. SRS missed one third of all lesions found at surgery. SRS detected 30% of gastrinomas < or =1.1 cm, 64% of those 1.1 to 2 cm, and 96% of those >2 cm and missed primarily small duodenal tumors. Tumor size correlated closely with SRS rate of detection. SRS did not increase the disease-free rate immediately after surgery or at 2 years mean follow-up., Conclusions: SRS is the most sensitive preoperative imaging study for extrahepatic gastrinomas in patients with ZES and should replace conventional imaging studies as the preoperative study of choice. Negative results of SRS for localizing extrahepatic gastrinomas should not be used to decide operability, because a surgical procedure will detect 33% more gastrinomas than SRS. SRS does not increase the disease-free rate. In the future, more sensitive methods to detect small gastrinomas, especially in the duodenum and in periduodenal lymph nodes, or more extensive surgery will be needed to improve the postoperative disease-free rate in ZES.

A patient with previous left caudal pancreatectomy and splenectomy presented with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Abdominal CT and endoscopic ultrasonography revealed a mass in the splenic area. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy showed a nodular increase of the uptake corresponding to the lesion detected with conventional imaging. A second laparotomy was performed and the mass was resected. Histological analysis showed that the nodular lesion was an accessory spleen. Since physiologic uptake of 111In-pentetreotide is seen in the spleen, an accessory spleen mimicking a tumor, specially after previous splenectomy, may result in false-positive somatostatin receptor scintigraphy.

Background: Controversy exists concerning the use of preoperative imaging studies in patients with islet cell tumors. Since 1993 we have evaluated the use of provocative angiography in patients with insulinoma or Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES)., Methods: Twelve patients with a working diagnosis of insulinoma (n = 4) or ZES (n = 8) were studied. Of the eight patients with ZES, four were known to have multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. All patients underwent conventional imaging studies followed by provocative angiography. Angiograms were graded based on the ability to detect tumor and regionalize it within the pancreas., Results: Of the three patients with a working diagnosis of ZES but equivocal results of biochemical studies, none had arteriographic imaging of an islet cell tumor or a positive provocative study result (true negative result). Of the nine patients with documented islet cell tumor, seven (78%) underwent arteriographic imaging of the tumor and eight (89%) had correct regional localization by provocative angiography. Sensitivity and specificity for imaging were 78% and 100%, respectively, and for regional localization 89% and 100%, respectively., Conclusions: Provocative angiography is the localization study of choice for both gastrinoma and insulinoma. Having few false-negative results, it can be used to corroborate the diagnosis and, having few false-positive results, it detects tumor and biochemically confirms localization in nearly every patient.

In a 46-year-old man with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, multiple imaging studies were negative for a primary gastrinoma. Preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) revealed a 3.3-cm mass which appeared to be in the pancreatic head. During surgery, a celiac lymph node of the size of the mass seen by EUS was found, but the pancreatic head also felt firm and was suspicious for a mass. After resection of the celiac node, intraoperative EUS revealed no mass in the pancreatic head. Based upon intraoperative EUS findings, the pancreatic head was not resected. Histologic evidence of gastrinoma was found in the celiac lymph node and a 4 to 5 mm nodule in the duodenal wall. Postoperatively serum gastrin levels returned to normal.

Background: Management of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) depends on the presence of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) or liver metastases, or both. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) detects previously unknown endocrine tumours., Aim and Methods: To evaluate SRS findings susceptible to modifying the management of patients with ZES-that is, relevant findings, and the specificity of these findings. The latter were defined according to our current therapeutic strategy in three subgroups of patients (sporadic, MEN 1, and liver metastases)., Patients: 85 consecutive patients without known extra-abdominal metastases were studied between September 1991 and March 1996., Results: Relevant findings were found in 41% of 49 patients with sporadic disease but without liver metastases, in 22% of 18 patients with MEN 1 but without liver metastases, and in 17% of 18 patients with liver metastases. Follow up was available for 20 (74%) of 27 patients who had 23 relevant findings. Nineteen relevant findings (83%) were confirmed at a median of three (range 0.25-45) months of follow up; four (17%) were not confirmed at 30 (range 12-52) months (p = 0.025). Findings located in the duodenopancreatic area (90%), chest (100%), bone (100%), and liver (60%) were confirmed. Most findings for patients with MEN 1 involved the chest., Conclusion: SRS detects many anomalies susceptible to modifying management of patients with ZES, especially in those with sporadic disease. The specificity of hot spots located outside the liver seems very high. By contrast, the specificity of hot spots located in the liver remains to be evaluated when conventional imaging is negative.

Unlabelled: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) has been used for the detection of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tumors. This study evaluates the clinical impact of SRS in GEP tumor detection and its therapeutic implications on patient management., Methods: We prospectively studied 160 patients with biologically and/or histologically proven GEP tumors. Before SRS, patients were classified into three groups: gastrointestinal (Group 1; n = 90) patients without known metastases; (Group 2; n = 59) patients with metastases limited to the liver; (Group 3; n = 11) patients with known extrahepatic metastases. The scintigraphic data were compared to the radiological findings., Results: In Group 1, without known metastases, conventional imaging detected 53 primary sites in 44 patients: SRS was positive in 68% of these sites and discovered 4 additional primary tumors in 3 patients and 16 metastases in 14 patients. Conventional imaging was negative in 46 patients: SRS discovered 47 new sites in 36 patients. In Group 2, SRS confirmed liver metastases in 95% of patients and discovered 45 new sites in 36 of these patients. In Group 3, SRS disclosed 11 new sites in 7 patients. These results modified patient classification in 38 cases (24%). Surgical therapeutic strategy was changed in 40 patients (25%)., Conclusion: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy improves tumor detection, has major clinical significance and should be performed systematically for staging and therapeutic decision making in patients with GEP tumors.

Eighteen patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome were studied with 111In-pentetreotide SPECT in order to localize gastrinoma, the tumour responsible for this pathology. NMR imaging was also carried out. Eight patients were operated. 111In-pentetreotide was reinjected 4 hours before operation and the radioactivity of the excised tumours counted. The nature of the withdrawn tissues was assessed by immunohistochemistry (chromogranina A). The scintigraphy was repeated 3-6 months after surgery. 111In pentetreotide SPECT was more sensitive than NMR. It was also absolutely specific because all the radioactive tumours excised showed positive chromogranin A staining. The radioactivity/gram counted in gastrinomas exceeded 10 fold the hepatic and biliary radioactivity and 20-100 folds the radioactivity of blood and omentum. In all the operated patients but three, the scintigraphy performed after surgery did not detect tumours. However complete eradication did not occur, because though 3-6 months after surgery the gastrinemia was significantly lower with respect to pre-surgery results it did not return to normal values in all patients but two.

Background & Aims: Duodenal gastrinomas and peripancreatic lymph nodes are difficult to localize. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of Octreoscan scintigraphy to detect such tumors., Methods: Results of Octreoscan scintigraphy in 21 consecutive patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome were compared with those of conventional imaging techniques, including endoscopic ultrasonography, and with the surgical findings., Results: Surgical exploration found 27 duodenal and/or lymph node gastrinomas in 19 patients. None had pancreatic gastrinoma. Octreoscan scintigraphy was the only positive preoperative technique in 32% of the patients. The sensitivities of conventional techniques, Octreoscan scintigraphy, and their association were 58%, 58%, and 90%, respectively, for all resected gastrinomas. The smallest duodenal gastrinoma detected by Octreoscan scintigraphy measured 3 mm. Endoscopic ultrasonography detected all the tumors visualized by any other conventional technique and was considered falsely positive, as was Octreoscan scintigraphy, in 1 patient. Follow-up and comparison between the number of resected gastrinomas and the number of preoperative hot spots suggested that surgeons should find at least as many tumors as the number of hot spots., Conclusions: Octreoscan scintigraphy improved the preoperative detection of extrapancreatic gastrinomas, mainly by endoscopic ultrasonography. Surgeons should find at least as many gastrinomas as the number of hot spots.

Objective: To compare the sensitivity of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy done using [111In-DTPA-DPhe1]octreotide with that of other imaging methods in the localization of gastrinomas in patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome., Design: Prospective study., Setting: Referral-based clinical research center., Patients: 80 consecutive patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome., Interventions: Conventional tumor localization studies (ultrasonography, computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], selective angiography, and bone scanning) and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy done using [111In-DTPA-DPhe1]octreotide with single-photon emission CT imaging at 4 and 24 hours. Patients with possible liver metastases had biopsies done for confirmation, and 15 patients had exploratory laparotomies done to assess primary tumor localization., Results: Extrahepatic gastrinomas or liver metastases were identified by ultrasonography in 19% of patients, by CT in 38% of patients, by MRI in 45% of patients, by angiography in 40% of patients, and by somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in 70% of patients. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy was as sensitive as the other tests combined (59%), and when the results of all other tests were added to the somatostatin receptor scintigraphy results, tumors were localized in 75% of patients. Among patients with a possible primary tumor, the results of ultrasonography were positive in 9%, the results of CT were positive in 31%, the results of MRI were positive in 30%, the results of angiography were positive in 28%, and the results of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy were positive in 58%. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy was as sensitive as all of the other imaging studies combined; when the results of scintigraphy were added to the results of the other studies, possible primary tumors were identified in 68% of patients. In 24 patients who had histologically proven metastatic liver disease, sensitivities for the detection of any metastatic liver lesions were 46% for ultrasonography, 42% for CT, 71% for MRI, 62% for angiography, and 92% for somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy was significantly better than all of the conventional imaging methods in the identification of gastrinomas later found at surgery (P = 0.004), but it still missed 20% of gastrinomas., Conclusions: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy is the single most sensitive method for imaging either primary or metastatic liver lesions in patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Because of its sensitivity, simplicity, and cost-effectiveness, it should be the first imaging method used in these patients. For patients with negative results on somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, guidelines about the use of other imaging studies are proposed.

Gastrinoma is a kind of neuroendocrine tumor very rare in children. It can be described as solitary and has been reported in the liver and in the kidney; or as part of MEN type I (tumors of parathyroids, pancreatic islets and pituitary). We report here, a solitary and huge pancreatic gastrinoma in a young girl with a Zollinger-Ellison (Z-E) syndrome, whose diagnosis was delayed by misunderstanding of the symptoms.

Gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors are difficult to localize. At the same time the tumor is localized, though, there is an opportunity for cure or to remove tumor tissue. In this study we have prospectively examined the ability of 111In-octreotide scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) to localize tumor lesions in 24 patients with a biochemical or histologic diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor. In eight patients a surgical assessment of the imaging results was prospectively performed. Planar and abdominal single-photon emission tomography (SPET) images acquired 4 and 24 hours after 180 to 220 MBq of 111In-octreotide injection were evaluated and compared with conventional imaging techniques. SPET scintigraphy visualized more presumed tumor lesions (n = 39) than conventional imaging studies (MRI,n = 25; CT,n = 13); 23 of 24 patients had positive octreotide scintigraphy, 17 of 24 had positive MRI-scans, and 12 of 24 patients had positive CT scans. It was concluded that 111In-octreotide scintigraphy combined with conventional imaging improves the preoperative localization of presumably tumorous lesions in patients with gastroenterohepatic endocrine tumors.

Background: Preoperative localization of gastrinomas by current imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) scan and angiography is still difficult because of the small size of tumor(s) in most patients undergoing operation. This study evaluated the diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography., Methods: Twenty-two patients presenting with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome underwent exploratory laparotomy after preoperative attempts to identify the gastrinoma(s) by CT scan, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasonography. Surgery included intraoperative ultrasonography and duodenal transillumination in all cases. The sensitivity and specificity of imaging techniques were then evaluated., Results: At least one tumor was found in 19 patients (four had two tumors and one had multiple tumors). Duodenal, lymph node, and pancreatic gastrinomas were found in 42%, 38%, and 17% of the patients, respectively. Sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasonography was 50% for duodenal wall tumors (conventional endoscopy, 40%), 75% for pancreatic tumors (CT scan, 25%), and 62.5% for tumoral lymph nodes (CT scan, 0%). The specificity of all techniques was excellent. Correct diagnosis was made by endoscopic ultrasonography alone in 41% of the patients. The combination of conventional endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography provided correct diagnosis in 60% of the patients., Conclusions: Endoscopic ultrasonography should be considered as a first-choice imaging technique for preoperative detection of gastrinomas. Although small duodenal gastrinomas are still obviously difficult to detect, an accurate exploration of the pancreatic area was provided by this technique.

Background: We have previously found selective venous sampling to be the most sensitive method to localize otherwise occult functioning endocrine tumors. However, recently we have used endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) as the initial and in some cases the only localization study in the preoperative evaluation of proven insulinomas and of selected cases of gastrinoma., Methods: All patients referred between April 1993 and April 1994 with a subsequently confirmed diagnosis of organic hyperinsulinism or Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) underwent EUS. Ten patients with insulinomas and six with gastrinomas were studied. Only one patient with ZES had multiple endocrine neoplasia type I. Patients with negative EUS findings had additional localization procedures including angiography and arterial stimulation tests. All but one patient underwent surgical exploration., Results: Solitary insulinomas were found in all 10 patients. EUS correctly identified and localized the insulinoma in seven (70%) of 10 patients but failed to identify two pedunculated insulinomas that were easily found at exploration. Because of an incomplete examination, a single insulinoma was not detected within the parenchyma. The EUS examination correctly excluded the pancreatic gastrinomas in five patients. The sixth patient, who had multiple endocrine neoplasia type I, had two 0.5 cm tumors in the head., Conclusions: EUS is a sensitive and cost-effective technique for localization of insulinomas and may be the only study needed. In patients with ZES a negative pancreatic result suggests the likelihood of a duodenal or other extrapancreatic tumor.

In patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, which is either sporadic or integrated into multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, accurate localization of all the tumours is difficult and may have therapeutic implications. In an attempt to improve this localization, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy using [111In-DTPA-D-Phe1]-octreotide was performed prospectively in 48 consecutive patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Thirty of them had the sporadic type of this disease. Scintigraphic data were compared with data obtained by conventional imaging methods, and also, in 32 selected patients, with those obtained by endoscopic ultrasonography. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy showed abnormal tracer uptake in 39 patients (81%), in whom it correctly identified 50 of the 60 tumoral sites (83%) previously localized by the other imaging methods. In 17 patients (35%) somatostatin receptor scintigraphy disclosed abnormal tracer uptake at 18 different tumoral sites: 14 were located in the abdomen, including four in the liver and eight in the duodenopancreatic area, and four outside the abdomen, including two in the mediastinum. Six of the ten tumoral sites which were not correctly identified by somatostatin receptor scintigraphy were located in the duodenopancreatic area. However, in the 20 patients for whom conventional techniques failed to visualize any tumour in the duodenopancreatic area, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy was positive in ten (50%) whereas endoscopic ultrasonography was only positive in five (25%). In our patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy appeared to be a useful new addition to the battery of tests used for tumour detection.

To determine the value of somatostatin-receptor scintigraphy in the localization of various endocrine gastrointestinal tumors, we compared the results obtained with this new technique with the results obtained with computed tomography and sonography. We could not find an overall advantage of somatostatin-receptor scintigraphy as compared to computed tomography or sonography in the localization of intestinal carcinoids (n = 13), gastrinomas (n = 12), functionally non-active endocrine pancreatic tumors (n = 8) and various other endocrine pancreatic tumors (n = 4). In 2 patients with endocrine pancreatic tumors however, the tumors were localized preoperatively only by somatostatin-receptor scintigraphy. Somatostatin-receptor scintigraphy may occasionally be helpful in the localization of gastrointestinal endocrine tumors if these tumors are not localized by conventional imaging studies. Somatostatin-receptor scintigraphy does not solve the problem to localize small endocrine tumors.

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) was performed in 14 patients (five men, nine women; mean age 51.5 [20-71] years) with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES), a gastrinoma proven in 7 and suspected on clinical or biochemical grounds in 7. The results were compared with those obtained by other methods (ultrasound, computed tomography, angiography). All 12 known tumour manifestations were demonstrated by SRS in seven patients with histologically confirmed gastrinoma. In four patients previously non-localized tumour was revealed by SRS, while in seven other patients the procedure led to modification of the treatment (primary tumour resection: n = 3, resection of metastases: n = 2, percutaneous radiation or chemoembolization: one each). These results suggest the following indications for SRS: (1) staging or re-staging in histologically proven gastrinoma and (2) search for primary tumour in clinically and biochemically suspected ZES.

A long-term cure is now possible in more than 30% of selected patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome who undergo gastrinoma resection. The need, however, for continued gastric acid antisecretory therapy in these patients remains controversial. The current study was designed to determine whether post-operative antisecretory therapy is needed in patients who have undergone successful gastrinoma resection and, if so, to attempt to define criteria with which to identify patients who require therapy. Twenty-eight consecutive patients who had previously undergone curative gastrinoma resection were prospectively studied. When antisecretory therapy was discontinued, 43% (12/28) of these patients developed gastro-oesophageal reflux, diarrhoea, acid-peptic symptoms or endoscopic evidence of acid-peptic disease within 2 weeks and were deemed to have failed a trial of antisecretory drug withdrawal. The remaining 57% (16/28) of patients who successfully discontinued antisecretory therapy were followed for a mean time of 31 months after withdrawal of therapy. Analysis of acid output studies pre-operatively, as well as at the time of drug withdrawal, demonstrated that patients who were unable to discontinue antisecretory therapy exhibited higher pre-operative maximal acid output values and higher basal acid output values at the time of attempted drug withdrawal than patients who were able to discontinue therapy. Despite these findings, there was significant overlap in acid output values between groups so that it was not possible to define specific acid output criteria for successful drug withdrawal. Pre-operative clinical characteristics, such as the presence or absence of gastro-esophageal reflux or acid-peptic disease, or post-operative laboratory values, such as the fasting serum gastrin level, did not correlate with the ability to discontinue antisecretory therapy. We conclude that following successful curative gastrinoma resection, 40% of patients still require antisecretory therapy and that both symptom evaluation as well as upper endoscopy should be used to guide attempted drug withdrawal. Although patients who are not able to discontinue therapy have significantly higher acid output measurements than those who are able to discontinue therapy, neither acid output criteria nor any other laboratory or clinical characteristics are able to predict the need for continued antisecretory therapy in these patients.