1. Catching the Zebra: Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls for the Successful Diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome.
- Author
-
Mendelson AH and Donowitz M
- Subjects
- Abdominal Pain blood, Abdominal Pain diagnostic imaging, Abdominal Pain epidemiology, Animals, Biomarkers blood, Diagnosis, Differential, Gastroesophageal Reflux blood, Gastroesophageal Reflux diagnostic imaging, Gastroesophageal Reflux epidemiology, Humans, Pancreatic Neoplasms blood, Pancreatic Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Pancreatic Neoplasms epidemiology, Peptic Ulcer blood, Peptic Ulcer diagnostic imaging, Peptic Ulcer epidemiology, Tomography, X-Ray Computed methods, Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome blood, Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome diagnostic imaging, Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome epidemiology
- Abstract
Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) results from an ectopic gastrin-secreting tumor leading to peptic ulcer disease, reflux, and chronic diarrhea. While early recognition portends an excellent prognosis with >80% survival at 15 years, symptoms are often nonspecific making the diagnosis difficult to establish. Diagnosis involves a series of tests, including fasting gastrin, gastric pH, chromogranin A, and secretin stimulation. Performing these tests in the correct sequence and at the proper time is essential to avoid inaccurate results. Tumor localization is equally nuanced. Although providers have classically used
111 indium-radiolabeled octreotide with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy to evaluate tumor size and metastases, recent studies have shown superior results with newer imaging modalities. In particular,68 gallium (68 Ga)-labeled somatostatin radiotracers (i.e.,68 Ga-DOTATOC,68 Ga-DOTANOC and68 Ga-DOTATATE) used with positron emission tomography/computed tomography can provide excellent results. Endoscopic ultrasound is another useful modality, particularly in patients with ZES in the setting of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. This review aims to provide clinicians with an overview of ZES with a focus on both clinical presentation and the proper utilization of the various biochemical and imaging tests available.- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF