Search

PURPOSE Evidence supports treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) with buprenorphine in primary care practices (PCPs). Barriers that slow implementation of this treatment include inadequately trained staff. This study aimed to increase the number of rural PCPs providing OUD treatment with buprenorphine. This evaluation describes the impact of a practice team training on the implementation and delivery of OUD treatment with buprenorphine in PCPs of rural Colorado. METHODS Implementing Technology and Medication Assisted Treatment Team Training in Rural Colorado (IT MATTTRs) was a multilevel implementation study that included a practice-focused intervention to improve awareness, adoption, and use of buprenorphine treatment for OUD. Participating PCP teams received the IT MATTTRs Practice Team Training and support. Practices' implementation of treatment components was assessed before and after training. Practice-reported and population-level data from the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program were obtained to describe changes in delivery of treatment after training. RESULTS Forty-two practices received team training. Practices reported an average of 4.7 treatment-related components in place at baseline compared with 13.0 at 12-month follow-up (F[2,56] = 31.17, P CONCLUSIONS The IT MATTTRs training for PCP teams in OUD treatment with buprenorphine addressed elements beyond clinician waiver training to make implementation feasible and effectively increased implementation and delivery of this treatment in rural Colorado. Key words: buprenorphine; education; opioid-related disorders; primary health care; rural health, INTRODUCTION The United States has an epidemic of opioid use disorder (OUD). Over 4 million Americans report using prescription pain medicine for nonmedical reasons. (1) First-time heroin users increased from [...]

Context: With increased depression, anxiety, and loneliness, communities need resources that support a culture of mental and emotional (M&E) well-being. Because other resources, such as Mental Health First Aid, require substantial time commitment and focus on intervening during crises and suicidality, rural community members developed COMET (Changing Our Mental and Emotional Trajectory), a universal community-based training program, to move upstream to prevent M&E health crises. COMET Community Training (CT) teaches people how to initiate a supportive interaction for a potentially emotional conversation using the simple, seven-item COMET conversational guide. The COMET Train the Trainer (T4T) equips community members to serve as their own local CT trainers. Objective: Describe training implementation and evaluation. Study Design: Survey and field notes. Setting: Rural communities. Population Studied: COMET CT and T4T attendees. Intervention/Instrument: Both trainings are 90-120 minutes. CT covers the local epidemiology of mental health, being 'the other person', instruction on COMET questions, role-play, and resources for follow-up. T4T includes program development and training tips. Trainees complete pre- and post-surveys. Outcome Measures: For CTs, the number and location of trainings, participant demographics, assessment of training structure, and intentions to use. For T4T, outcomes also include relevance of materials and preparedness to conduct community member training. Results: Fifteen people completed COMET T4T. Most (93%) T4T trainees identify as female. Mental health care (40%) and the agricultural industry (25%) were the most common professional categories. 80% agreed/strongly agreed they feel prepared to deliver the CT. More time to practice was a main strategy to improve the T4T. Over 300 people have attended 25 CTs. Of these, 76% reported they were likely to use the COMET questions to engage an acquaintance or co-worker after training compared to 48% before. 81% reported a 7 or higher on a scale of 1-10 for likelihood of using the COMET questions in the next 3 months. Conclusions: COMET aims to prevent M&E health crisis, complement efforts in primary and behavioral health practice settings, and fill a public M&E health gap, particularly in rural communities. The COMET T4T and CT are accessible to diverse and hard-to-reach community members and are increasing in demand. Evaluation results offer useful modifications to strengthen the program., Presenters Kristen Curcija, MPH, Christin Sutter, Linda Zittleman, MSPH, John Westfall, MD, MPH, Chris Frakes, PhD, M.Div., MARANDA MILLER, BA, CPSII, Tamara Oser, MD, Maret Felzien, MA, Joseph Carrica [...]

Opioid use disorder (OUD) represents a public health crisis in the United States. Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) with buprenorphine in primary care is a proven OUD treatment strategy. MOUD induction is when patients begin withdrawal and receive the first doses of buprenorphine. Differences between induction methods might influence short-term stabilization, long-term maintenance, and quality of life. This paper describes the protocol for a study designed to: (1) compare short-term stabilization and long-term maintenance treatment engagement in MOUD in patients receiving office, home, or telehealth induction and (2) identify clinically-relevant practice and patient characteristics associated with successful long-term treatment. The study design is a randomized, parallel group, pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial of three care models of MOUD induction in 100 primary care practices in the United States. Eligible patients are at least 16 years old, have been identified by their clinician as having opioid dependence and would benefit from MOUD. Patients will be randomized to one of three induction comparators: office, home, or telehealth induction. Primary outcomes are buprenorphine medication-taking and illicit opioid use at 30, 90, and 270 days post-induction. Secondary outcomes include quality of life and potential mediators of treatment maintenance (intentions, planning, automaticity). Potential moderators include social determinants of health, substance use history and appeal, and executive function. An intent to treat analysis will assess effects of the interventions on long-term treatment, using general/generalized linear mixed models, adjusted for covariates, for the outcomes analysis. Analysis includes practice- and patient-level random effects for hierarchical/longitudinal data. No large-scale, randomized comparative effectiveness research has compared home induction to office or telehealth MOUD induction on long-term outcomes for patients with OUD seen in primary care settings. The results of this study will offer primary care providers evidence and guidance in selecting the most beneficial induction method(s) for specific patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study reports the baseline knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and personal practices of health care professionals regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the High Plains Research Network (HPRN) of rural Colorado prior to a community-based educational intervention. It also examines the association between health care staff members' knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and personal practices for CRC screening and patient screening levels by practice. Methods: Surveys were mailed to health care professionals in the HPRN. Participating clinics (n = 21) distributed patient surveys on CRC screening to persons aged greater than or equal to 50 for a 2-week period in 2006. Results: The survey response rate was 81% for providers (n = 46) and 90% for nursing staff (n = 63). Only 54% of health care professionals knew CRC is a leading cause of cancer deaths. When surveyed on their attitudes toward colon cancer, 92% "strongly agreed" or "agreed" that colon cancer is preventable. About 99% (n = 107) of providers and nurses "strongly agreed" or "agreed" that testing could identify problems before colon cancer starts. Most health care professionals (61%) aged greater than or equal to 50 years had previously been tested and were up-to-date (52%) with screening. Provider knowledge was significantly associated with higher patient screening (P = 0.02), but provider attitudes and beliefs were not. Moreover, personal screening practices of health care professionals did not correlate with more patients screened. Conclusion: Background knowledge of CRC among HPRN health care professionals could be improved. The results of this pilot study may help focus effective approaches such as increasing provider knowledge to enhance CRC screening in the relevant population.

Context: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States, yet screening rates are well below target levels. Rural communities may face common and unique barriers to health care, particularly preventive health care. Purpose: To establish baseline attitudinal, knowledge, belief, and behavior measures on colorectal cancer screening and to identify barriers to or predictors of colorectal cancer screening. Methods: As part of a controlled trial using a quasi-experimental, pretest, post-test design, we conducted a baseline telephone survey of 1,050 rural eastern Colorado residents aged 50 years and older. Smaller counties were over-sampled to ensure a minimum of 30 completed interviews per county. Findings: Seventy-seven percent reported they ever had a colorectal cancer screening test and 59% were up-to-date on at least 1 test. The most important independent predictors of being up-to-date were having visited a doctor or other health care practitioner for a checkup in the past year, having personal or family history of colon polyps or cancer, and having asked for a colorectal cancer screening test. Financial concerns were reported reasons for not obtaining fecal occult blood testing by 18% and colonoscopy by 21%. Conclusions: This study suggests that health care providers should be vigilant in counseling their patients 50 and older to have a colorectal cancer test. Community programs designed to promote colon cancer screening should encourage residents to have regular contact with their primary care physician and ask their doctor for a screening test. Additionally, programs should provide financial assistance for testing for low-income and uninsured patients.

Key Points: Question: What are the operating characteristics of the CAPTURE ([chronic obstructive pulmonary disease] COPD Assessment in Primary Care To Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk) screening tool (composed of 5 questions and selective use of peak expiratory flow rate) to identify undiagnosed, clinically significant COPD among US primary care patients? Findings: In this cross-sectional study of 4325 patients from US primary care settings, the CAPTURE tool demonstrated a sensitivity of 48.2% and a specificity of 88.6% for detecting clinically significant COPD, which was defined by spirometry results showing airflow obstruction of moderate severity or accompanied by a history of acute respiratory illness. Meaning: In US primary care, the CAPTURE screening tool did not perform well identifying undiagnosed, clinically significant COPD. Importance: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is underdiagnosed in primary care. Objective: To evaluate the operating characteristics of the CAPTURE (COPD Assessment in Primary Care To Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk) screening tool for identifying US primary care patients with undiagnosed, clinically significant COPD. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, 4679 primary care patients aged 45 years to 80 years without a prior COPD diagnosis were enrolled by 7 primary care practice–based research networks across the US between October 12, 2018, and April 1, 2022. The CAPTURE questionnaire responses, peak expiratory flow rate, COPD Assessment Test scores, history of acute respiratory illnesses, demographics, and spirometry results were collected. Exposure: Undiagnosed COPD. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the CAPTURE tool's sensitivity and specificity for identifying patients with undiagnosed, clinically significant COPD. The secondary outcomes included the analyses of varying thresholds for defining a positive screening result for clinically significant COPD. A positive screening result was defined as (1) a CAPTURE questionnaire score of 5 or 6 or (2) a questionnaire score of 2, 3, or 4 together with a peak expiratory flow rate of less than 250 L/min for females or less than 350 L/min for males. Clinically significant COPD was defined as spirometry-defined COPD (postbronchodilator ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration [FEV1] to forced vital capacity [FEV1:FVC] <0.70 or prebronchodilator FEV1:FVC <0.65 if postbronchodilator spirometry was not completed) combined with either an FEV1 less than 60% of the predicted value or a self-reported history of an acute respiratory illness within the past 12 months. Results: Of the 4325 patients who had adequate data for analysis (63.0% were women; the mean age was 61.6 years [SD, 9.1 years]), 44.6% had ever smoked cigarettes, 18.3% reported a prior asthma diagnosis or use of inhaled respiratory medications, 13.2% currently smoked cigarettes, and 10.0% reported at least 1 cardiovascular comorbidity. Among the 110 patients (2.5% of 4325) with undiagnosed, clinically significant COPD, 53 had a positive screening result with a sensitivity of 48.2% (95% CI, 38.6%-57.9%) and a specificity of 88.6% (95% CI, 87.6%-89.6%). The area under the receiver operating curve for varying positive screening thresholds was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.85). Conclusions and Relevance: Within this US primary care population, the CAPTURE screening tool had a low sensitivity but a high specificity for identifying clinically significant COPD defined by presence of airflow obstruction that is of moderate severity or accompanied by a history of acute respiratory illness. Further research is needed to optimize performance of the screening tool and to understand whether its use affects clinical outcomes. This cross-sectional study evaluates the operating characteristics of the CAPTURE screening tool by identifying US primary care patients with undiagnosed, clinically significant COPD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Rates of vitamin D deficiency and nutritional rickets have been rising over the past several decades, particularly in high-risk infants. This pilot study assessed the impact of providing free vitamin D supplements, a culturally-appropriate educational brochure, and a brief counseling session about the importance of both vitamin D supplementation and breastfeeding to the parents of Somali infants at routine office visits from newborn through 6 months of age at three Federally Qualified Health Centers in Colorado. We also assessed the impact this intervention had on rates of breastfeeding. Methods: Twenty-five Somali infants aged 24 weeks or less were identified by searching electronic health records and enrolled into a historic control group. The parents were then surveyed by phone regarding breastfeeding and vitamin D supplementation. Subsequently, 37 families with newborn Somali infants were identified and enrolled into the intervention arm of the trial. Results: The intervention group had a higher rate of vitamin D supplementation compared to the historical control group (67 vs. 48 percent, p=0.011) without significantly impacting breastfeeding rates. Conclusion: These results suggest a practical way to increase vitamin D status in this high-risk population. Trial not registered as it was a pilot study, not a phase II to IV prospective clinical trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Understanding knowledge of and attitudes toward medication‐assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid use disorder (OUD) is important to changing the conversation about this devastating public health problem. While several studies report clinician knowledge and attitudes and training, less is known about community member perspectives. As part of the Implementing Technology and Medication Assisted Treatment Team Training in Rural Colorado study (IT MATTTRs), this study describes the implementation of community‐based interventions developed by rural community members and researchers to increase awareness and promote positive attitudes toward MAT for OUD and explores changes in community members' OUD and MAT knowledge and beliefs. Methods: Using the Boot Camp Translation process, the High Plains Research Network and Colorado Research Network MAT Advisory Councils developed multicomponent interventions on MAT for OUD. Baseline and postintervention surveys were administered using venue‐based sampling of community members in rural communities. Findings: Surveys were completed by 789 community members at baseline and 798 at postintervention. Nearly half (49%) reported exposure to at least 1 intervention product. Greater exposure to intervention materials was associated with beliefs that using opioids to get high in rural communities is a problem (P <.0001), that opioid addiction is a chronic disease (P =.0032), and that OUD can be treated locally (P =.0003). Conclusions: Partnering with local community members resulted in the successful development and implementation of community‐based interventions, exposure to which was associated with OUD knowledge and beliefs. Locally created interventions should be included in comprehensive approaches to stem the OUD epidemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]