Search

Background: In Tajikistan, where there are about 8,000 cases annually, many new cases are being diagnosed with severe disease, indicating a delay in receiving care. We aimed to estimate the proportion with delayed care and the main factors contributing to delayed care., Methods: Using a retrospective cohort design, we conducted a study that included all people aged over 15 years who were newly diagnosed with pulmonary TB in Dushanbe from 2019 to 2021. We defined 'patient delay' as > 14 days from TB symptom onset to the first provider visit and 'provider delay' as > 3 days from the first visit to treatment initiation. Data was abstracted from medical records and participants were interviewed in-person. Multivariable negative binomial regression was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI)., Results: Of 472 participants, 49% were male, 65% had lung tissue cavitation, 33% had drug resistant TB, 11% had diabetes, 4% had HIV, and. Reported cases dropped from 196 in 2019 to 109 in 2020 and increased to 167 in 2021. The proportion of people experiencing patient delays was 82%, 72%, and 90% per year, respectively. The proportion of provider delays was 44%, 41% and 29% per year. Patient delay was associated with year (aRR: 1.09 [CI:1.02-1.18] in 2021 vs. 2019), age (aRR:0.91 [0.82-0.99] for 40-59-year-olds vs. 15-39-year-olds), having HIV (aRR:1.22 [1.08-1.38]), having blood in sputum (aRR:1.19 [1.10-1.28]), chest pain (aRR:1.32 [1.14-1.54]), having at least two structural barriers vs. none (aRR:1.52 [1.28-1.80]), having one of the following barriers: long wait lines (aRR:1.36 [1.03-1.80]), feeling that healthcare services were expensive (aRR:1.54 [1.28-1.85]), or having no time or too much work (aRR:1.54 [1.29-1.84]). Provider delay was associated with year (aRR: 0.67 [0.51-0.89] in 2021 vs. 2019), patients having to pay for X-ray services (aRR: 1.59 [1.22-2.07]) and lacking direct-observed-therapy (DOTS) in facility (aRR: 1.61 [1.03-2.52])., Conclusions: Patient delay was high before the COVID-19 pandemic and increased in 2021, while provider delay decreased during this time. Addressing structural barriers to healthcare services, such as increased DOTS facilities, expanded hours, and zero fees, may decrease delays., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Our study was conducted in accordance the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval for the study was received from the local ethical commission of the Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Kazakhstan (No. 6 (129), 05/25/2022) and the Ministry of Health of Tajikistan. This activity was reviewed by the CDC and was determined to be non-research and conducted consistently with applicable U.S. federal law and CDC policy (45 C.F.R. part 46, 21 C.F.R. part 56; 42 U.S.C. 241(d); 5 U.S.C. § 552a; 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Clinical trial number: not applicable. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, oral consent was obtained for participants interviewed virtually and written consent for those interviewed in-person. Written informed consent was obtained from parents of participants ages 15–17 years old who also provided verbal assent for participation. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic negatively influenced the availability of tuberculosis (TB) services, such as detection, diagnosis and treatment, around the world, including Kazakhstan. We set out to estimate the COVID-19 pandemic influence on TB treatment outcomes by comparing outcomes among people starting treatment before the pandemic (2018-2019) and during the pandemic (2020-2021) and to determine risk factors associated with unfavorable outcomes., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among all people newly diagnosed with drug-sensitive pulmonary or extrapulmonary TB at least 18 years old who initiated treatment from 2018 to 2021 in Almaty. We abstracted data from the national electronic TB register. Unfavorable treatment outcomes were ineffective treatment, death, loss to follow-up, results not evaluated, and transferred. We used multivariable Poisson regression to calculate adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI)., Results: Among 1548 people newly diagnosed with TB during the study period, average age was 43 years (range 18-93) and 52% were male. The number of people initiating treatment was higher before than the pandemic (935 vs. 613, respectively). There was significantly different proportions before compared to during the pandemic for people diagnosed through routine screening (39% vs. 31%, p  < 0.001), 60 years and older (16% vs. 22%, p  = 0.005), and with diabetes (5% vs. 8%, p  = 0.017). There was no difference in the proportion of HIV (8% in both periods). Unfavorable outcomes increased from 11 to 20% during the pandemic (aRR = 1.83; 95% CI: 1.44-2.31). Case fatality rose from 6 to 9% ( p  = 0.038). Risk factors for unfavorable TB treatment outcomes among all participants were being male (aRR = 1.44, 95%CI = 1.12-1.85), having HIV (aRR = 2.72, 95%CI = 1.99-3.72), having alcohol use disorder (aRR = 2.58, 95%CI = 1.83-3.62) and experiencing homelessness (aRR = 2.94, 95%CI = 1.80-4.80). Protective factors were being 18-39 years old (aRR = 0.33, 95%CI = 0.24-0.44) and 40-59 years old (aRR = 0.56, 95%CI = 0.41-0.75) compared to 60 years old and up., Conclusion: COVID-19 pandemic was associated with unfavorable treatment outcomes for people newly diagnosed with drug-sensitive TB in Almaty, Kazakhstan. People with fewer comorbidities were at increased risk. Results point to the need to maintain continuity of care for persons on TB treatment, especially those at higher risk for poor outcomes during periods of healthcare service disruption., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Gabdullina, Maes, Horth, Dzhazybekova, Amanova, Zikriyarova and Nabirova.)

Background: Clinical practice guidelines were continually changing during the COVID-19 pandemic to reflect the best available evidence for a novel virus. In Kazakhstan, the national clinical guidelines for COVID-19 patient care were regularly modified and it was not known if and to what extent these guidelines were being followed in practice., Methods: We conducted a sub-analysis of data collected from an observational study among people hospitalized with COVID-19 in a large infectious disease hospital in Almaty in four cross-sections of increased COVID-19 incidence: T1 (1 June-30 August 2020); T2 (1 October-31 December 2020); T3 (1 April-31 May 2021); and T4 (1 July-26 October 2021). Modifications to the national COVID-19 treatment guidelines were identified and clinical data were abstracted from electronic medical records. We assessed frequency of antibiotic, glucocorticoid, anticoagulant, and antiviral administered in each period and determined if these aligned with national clinical guidelines. We used multivariable logistic regression to compare practices across periods., Results: Six modifications were made to national COVID-19 treatment guidelines during this study. Of 1,146 people hospitalized with COVID-19, 14% were in T1, 14% in T2, 22% in T3, and 50% in T4. Anticoagulant treatment was administered to 87% (range: 56%-95%), antibiotic treatment to 60% (range: 58%-64%), glucocorticoid to 55% (range: 43%-64%) and antiviral therapy 15% (range: 7%-22%). Majority of treatments were not aligned with national guidelines, including 98% of anticoagulant use, 95% of antibiotic use, 56% of glucocorticoid use, and 56% of antiviral use. There were no significant changes in practice following changes in guidelines for antibiotic use (64% in T1 to 58% in T2, p  = 0.30). There was significant increase in use of anticoagulant (84% in T2 vs. 95% in T3, p  < 0.01), glucocorticoid (43% in T2 vs. 64% in T3, p  < 0.01), and antiviral treatment (7% in T3 vs. 15% in T4, p  < 0.01) after guidelines updates., Conclusion: The majority of treatments administered to people hospitalized with COVID-19 in four periods of high incidence in Almaty were not aligned with updated clinical guidelines. Antibiotic misuse was markedly high throughout. Increased awareness and training on clinical practice guidelines as updates are released may help improve adoption of evidence-based practices., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Gazezova, Nabirova, Detmar, Smagul, Kasabekova, Zikriyarova and Horth.)