Kevin R. Wilcox, John M. Blair, Juha M. Alatalo, Anu Eskelinen, Tony J. Svejcar, Annika K. Jägerbrand, Laura Yahdjian, David Samuel Johnson, Lara Souza, J. Patrick Megonigal, Lauren M. Hallett, Peter B. Reich, R. Travis Belote, Scott L. Collins, Juliette M. G. Bloor, Christel C. Kern, Andrew Baldwin, Yiqi Luo, Patrick J. Bohlen, Katherine N. Suding, Rien Aerts, Qiang Yu, Roy Turkington, Emily Grman, K. Blake Suttle, Mark J. Hovenden, Melinda D. Smith, Wei Li, Steven C. Pennings, Laura Gough, Bryan L. Foster, Carl Beierkuhnlein, John W. Morgan, Pedro M. Tognetti, Jodi N. Price, John P. Anderson, James F. Cahill, Guozhen Du, Shannon R. White, Forest Isbell, Rebecca L. McCulley, Osvaldo E. Sala, Kimberly J. Komatsu, Meghan L. Avolio, Xingguo Han, J. Hans C. Cornelissen, Edward W. Bork, Zhuwen Xu, Janet S. Prevéy, Jimin Cheng, David Tilman, Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia, Yunhai Zhang, Elizabeth H. Boughton, Gregory R. Houseman, Andrea J. Britton, Sara G. Baer, Jennifer Firn, Vladimir G. Onipchenko, Nathan P. Lemoine, Pengfei Zhang, William D. Bowman, Anke Jentsch, Harry Harmens, Enrique J. Chaneton, Alan K. Knapp, Juergen Kreyling, Katherine L. Gross, Jennie R. McLaren, Sally E. Koerner, Eric W. Seabloom, F. Leland Russell, Kari Klanderud, Nona R. Chiariello, Clare H. Robinson, Jonathan D. Bates, Systems Ecology, Amsterdam Sustainability Institute, Unité Mixte de Recherche sur l'Ecosystème Prairial - UMR (UREP), and Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)
Fil: Komatsu, Kimberly J. Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater. United States. Fil: Avolio, Meghan L. Johns Hopkins University. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences. Baltimore, United States. Fil: Lemoine, Nathan P. Marquette University. Department of Biological Sciences. Milwaukee, United States. Fil: Chaneton, Enrique José. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. Fil: Chaneton, Enrique José. CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. Fil: Tognetti, Pedro Maximiliano.Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. Fil: Tognetti, Pedro Maximiliano.CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. Fil: Yahdjian, María Laura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. Fil: Yahdjian, María Laura. CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. Fil: Isbell, Forest. University of Minnesota. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior. Saint Paul, United States. Fil: Grman, Emily. Eastern Michigan University. Department of Biology. Ypsilanti, United States. Global change drivers (GCDs) are expected to alter community structure and consequently, the services that ecosystems provide. Yet, few experimental investigations have examined effects of CDs on plant community structure across multiple ecosystem types, and those that do exist present conflicting patterns. In an unprecedented global synthesis of over 100 experiments that manipulated factors linked to GCDs, we show that herbaceous plant community responses depend on experimental manipulation length and number of factors manipulated. We found that plant communities are fairly resistant to experimentally manipulated GCDs in the short term ( minor to 10 y). In contrast, long-term (major or equal to 10 y) experiments show increasing community divergence of treatments from control conditions. Surprisingly, these community responses occurred with similar frequency across the GCD types manipulated in our database. However, community responses were more common when 3 or more GCDs were simultaneously manipulated, suggesting the emergence of additive or synergistic effects of multiple drivers, particularly over long time periods. In half of the cases, GCD manipulations caused a difference in community composition without a corresponding species richness difference, indicating that species reordering or replacement is an important mechanism of community responses to GCDs and should be given greater consideration when examining consequences of GCDs for the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship. Human activities are currently driving unparalleled global changes worldwide. Our analyses provide the most comprehensive evidence to date that these human activities may have widespread impacts on plant community composition globally, which will increase in frequency over time and be greater in areas where communities face multiple GCDs simultaneously. tbls., grafs.