Search

Abstract: Precision medicine is vital for treating many cancers. Lack of valid biomarkers might contribute to the failure of drug therapy for GBM. The Denovo Genomic Marker 1 (DGM1), a novel pharmacogenomic biomarker, has been discovered by a genome-wide screen of patients treated with DB102 (enzastaurin) in a trial for lymphoma. Similarly, retrospective analyses showed that DB102 significantly improved outcomes in the biomarker positive GBM patients treated with DB102, regardless of MGMT promoter methylation status. The ENGAGE Study (DB102-01, NCT03776071) is a global Phase 3 clinical trial to confirm clinical benefits in patients with newly diagnosed GBM who are DGM1 biomarker positive. This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study. A total of 318 patients with newly diagnosed GBM will be enrolled. After screening, patients will be randomized to receive radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) plus either DB102 or a matched placebo for 6 weeks in the Concurrent Phase, followed by DB102 or placebo for approximately 5 weeks in the Single-Agent Phase and then TMZ plus DB102 or placebo in the Adjuvant Phase (up to 12 cycles). Thereafter DB102 or placebo may be continued as a single agent for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints include progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and drug safety. By April 2021, the safety-run-in part was completed. The study is now open for enrollment in the US and soon in Canada and China.

ImportanceNew treatments are needed to improve the prognosis of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma.ObjectiveTo compare overall survival for patients receiving tumor resection followed by vocimagene amiretrorepvec (Toca 511) with flucytosine (Toca FC) vs standard of care (SOC).Design, setting, and participantsA randomized, open-label phase 2/3 trial (TOCA 5) in 58 centers in the US, Canada, Israel, and South Korea, comparing posttumor resection treatment with Toca 511 followed by Toca FC vs a defined single choice of approved (SOC) therapies was conducted from November 30, 2015, to December 20, 2019. Patients received tumor resection for first or second recurrence of glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma.InterventionsPatients were randomized 1:1 to receive Toca 511/FC (n = 201) or SOC control (n = 202). For the Toca 511/FC group, patients received Toca 511 injected into the resection cavity wall at the time of surgery, followed by cycles of oral Toca FC 6 weeks after surgery. For the SOC control group, patients received investigators' choice of single therapy: lomustine, temozolomide, or bevacizumab.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was overall survival (OS) in time from randomization date to death due to any cause. Secondary outcomes reported in this study included safety, durable response rate (DRR), duration of DRR, durable clinical benefit rate, OS and DRR by IDH1 variant status, and 12-month OS.ResultsAll 403 randomized patients (median [SD] age: 56 [11.46] years; 62.5% [252] men) were included in the efficacy analysis, and 400 patients were included in the safety analysis (3 patients on the SOC group did not receive resection). Final analysis included 271 deaths (141 deaths in the Toca 511/FC group and 130 deaths in the SOC control group). The median follow-up was 22.8 months. The median OS was 11.10 months for the Toca 511/FC group and 12.22 months for the control group (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI 0.83, 1.35; P = .62). The secondary end points did not demonstrate statistically significant differences. The rates of adverse events were similar in the Toca 511/FC group and the SOC control group.Conclusions and relevanceAmong patients who underwent tumor resection for first or second recurrence of glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma, administration of Toca 511 and Toca FC, compared with SOC, did not improve overall survival or other efficacy end points.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02414165.

IntroductionTumor Treating Fields (TTFields; antimitotic treatment) delivers low-intensity, intermediate-frequency, alternating electric fields through skin-applied transducer arrays. TTFields (200 kHz) was FDA-approved in glioblastoma (GBM), based on the phase 3 EF-11 (recurrent GBM, rGBM) and EF-14 (newly diagnosed GBM, ndGBM) trials. The most common TTFields-related adverse event (AE) in both trials was array-associated skin irritation. We now report on TTFields-related AEs in the real-world, clinical practice setting.MethodsUnsolicited, post-marketing surveillance data from TTFields-treated patients (October 2011-February 2019) were retrospectively analyzed using MedDRA v21.1 preferred terms, stratified by region (US, EMEA [Europe, Middle East, Africa], Japan), diagnosis (ndGBM, rGBM, anaplastic astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma, other brain tumors), and age ( 11,000 patients revealed no new safety concerns, with a favorable safety profile comparable with published TTFields/GBM trials. The safety profile remained consistent among subgroups, suggesting feasibility in multiple populations, including elderly patients.

Simple Summary: This study investigates an imaging method for distinguishing different lesions in brain cancer patients using MRI scans. Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive brain tumor, and it is crucial to differentiate between actual tumor recurrence, radiation-induced damage, and side effects from a common treatment called Bevacizumab. Traditional MRI techniques often struggle to make these distinctions, leading to challenges in treatment decisions. This study explores the use of a specific MRI measurement, called Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values, to improve diagnostic accuracy. By identifying unique patterns in ADC values, this method could help better determine the nature of brain lesions, ultimately leading to more precise and effective treatment plans for glioblastoma patients. Objectives: Glioblastomas (GBM) are the most common primary invasive neoplasms of the brain. Distinguishing between lesion recurrence and different types of treatment related changes in patients with GBM remains challenging using conventional MRI imaging techniques. Therefore, accurate and precise differentiation between true progression or pseudoresponse is crucial in deciding on the appropriate course of treatment. This retrospective study investigated the potential of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map values derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as a noninvasive method to increase diagnostic accuracy in treatment response. Methods: A cohort of 21 glioblastoma patients (mean age: 59.2 ± 11.8, 12 Male, 9 Female) that underwent treatment with bevacizumab were selected. The ADC values were calculated from the DWI images obtained from a standardized brain protocol across 1.5-T and 3-T MRI scanners. Ratios were calculated for rADC values. Lesions were classified as bevacizumab-induced cytotoxicity based on characteristic imaging features (well-defined regions of restricted diffusion with persistent diffusion restriction over the course of weeks without tissue volume loss and absence of contrast enhancement). The rADC value was compared to these values in radiation necrosis and recurrent lesions, which were concluded in our prior study. The nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test with p < 0.05 was used for significance. Results: The mean ± SD age of the selected patients was 59.2 ± 11.8. ADC values and corresponding mean rADC values for bevacizumab-induced cytotoxicity were 248.1 ± 67.2 and 0.39 ± 0.10, respectively. These results were compared to the ADC values and corresponding mean rADC values of tumor progression and radiation necrosis. Significant differences between rADC values were observed in all three groups (p < 0.001). Bevacizumab-induced cytotoxicity had statistically significant lower ADC values compared to both tumor recurrence and radiation necrosis. Conclusion: The study demonstrates the potential of ADC values as noninvasive imaging biomarkers for differentiating recurrent glioblastoma from radiation necrosis and bevacizumab-induced cytotoxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly aggressive cancer with poor prognosis, and an overall survival of 6 to 7 months with optimal therapies. The NovoTTF-100A™ System is a novel antimitotic cancer therapy recently approved for the treatment of recurrent GBM, based on phase III (EF-11) trial results. The Patient Registry Dataset (PRiDe) is a post-marketing registry of all recurrent GBM patients who received NovoTTF Therapy in a real-world, clinical practice setting in the United States between 2011 and 2013. Data were collected from all adult patients with recurrent GBM who began commercial NovoTTF Therapy in the United States between October 2011 and November 2013. All patients provided written consent before treatment was started. Overall survival (OS) curves were constructed for PRiDe using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median OS in PRiDe was compared for patients stratified by average daily compliance (≥75% v