Search

Background: This study compared a co‐ablation (CA) system, which is a novel ablation device, with an argon‐helium cryoablation (AHC) system. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of CA and AHC for the treatment of stage III–IV non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine whether CA was noninferior to AHC. The primary efficacy endpoints were the iceball coverage rate (ICR) and the disease control rate (DCR) one month after treatment. Noninferiority was declared if the lower limit of two‐sided 95% confidence interval (CI) was less than 10%. The ICR and DCR were identified by logistic regression. Treatment safety was assessed. Results: A total of 81 patients underwent randomization (41 assigned to the CA and 40 assigned to the AHC groups)and transthoracic ablation. The ICRs in the CA and AHC groups were 99.24% ± 2.18% and 98.66% ± 3.79%, respectively. Central lesions were associated with an increased risk of an incomplete ICR. The DCRs in the CA and AHC groups were 97.6% and 95%, respectively. A smaller lesion area in the CA group was significantly correlated with a better DCR. The rate of complications was 29.26% in the CA group and 30% in the AHC group. (P = 0.943). There was less probe usage per patient in the CA group. Conclusions: We determined that CA is noninferior to AHC in terms of efficacy and safety for the treatment of stage III–IV NSCLC. A smaller lesion area in the CA group was significantly correlated with a better DCR. Key points: CA was noninferior to AHC for stage III–IV NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cervical carcinosarcoma is an extremely rare type of neoplasm that lacks standard of care. Preclinical and clinical evidence has suggested that cryoablation in combination with immunotherapy may result in a synergistic effect, generating a more robust immune response to distant lesions. A few clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy of such combination treatment in a variety of solid tumors, but with conflicting results. This report describes the first clinical efficacy of cryoablation followed by pembrolizumab observed in a patient with tumor mutational burden (TMB)‐high metastatic cervical carcinosarcoma that was negative for programmed cell death protein 1 expression, microsatellite instability stable, and had mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE). She had achieved complete response (CR) after 3 months of pembrolizumab treatment and had maintained CR as of the time of submission of this manuscript, with a progression‐free survival of 11 months and counting. The case exhibited an exceptional response to cryoablation followed by pembrolizumab, potentially attributed to mutations in POLE, which lead to an extremely high TMB. This report paves the avenue for establishing treatment regimens for patients with TMB‐high cervical carcinosarcoma. Key Points: Owing to its rarity, cervical carcinosarcoma has not been well characterized, and currently, there is no standard of care for this disease.This report describes the first case of clinical efficacy of cryoablation followed by pembrolizumab observed in a patient with tumor mutational burden‐high metastatic cervical carcinosarcoma.The case exhibited an exceptional response (maintained CR as of the time of submission of this article: 11 months) to cryoablation followed by pembrolizumab.This is the first POLE‐mutated cervical carcinosarcoma case. This article presents the first case showing the clinical efficacy of cryoablation followed by pembrolizumab observed in a patient with tumor mutational burden‐high metastatic cervical carcinosarcoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]