Search

Reassessment tools of response to long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) are important in predicting complete response (CR) and thus deciding whether a wait-and-watch strategy can be implemented in these patients. Choosing which routine reassessment tools are optimal and when to use them is still unclear and will be researched in the study.Altogether, 250 patients with LARC who received nCRT from 2013 to 2021 and were followed up were retrospectively reviewed. Common reassessment tools of response included digital rectal examination (DRE), clinical examination and symptoms, endoscopy, biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and blood biomarkers.Overall, 27.20% (68/250) patients had a complete response and 72.80% (182/250) did not. The combination of MRI, endoscopy, and biopsy showed the best performance in terms of accuracy of 74% and area under the curve (AUC, 0.714, 95% CI 0.546-0.882). Reassessing through DRE and presence of symptoms failed to improve the efficacy of response reassessment. After 100 days, biopsy as an assessment tool would obtain a substantial rise in accuracy from 51.28 to 100% (p = 0.003).The combination of MRI, endoscopy, and biopsy is suitable as the reassessment tool of response for applying a wait-and-watch strategy after long-course nCRT in patients with LARC. The accuracy of biopsy as reassessment tools would be improved if they were used over 100 days after nCRT in patients with rectal cancer.

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is the most common form of distant metastasis and one of the leading causes of death in gastric cancer (GC). For locally advanced GC, clinical guidelines recommend peritoneal lavage cytology for intraoperative PM detection. Unfortunately, current peritoneal lavage cytology is limited by low sensitivity (

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most serious postoperative complication for patients with gastric cancer. We aim to develop clinically tools to detect AL in the early phase by analysis of the inflammatory factors (IFs) in abdominal drainage. We prospectively included 326 patients to establish two independent cohorts, and the concentration of IFs within abdominal drainage was detected. In the primary cohort, an IF-based AL prediction model was constructed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. The predictive value of the model was later validated via the validation cohort. Analyzing the IFs with LASSO regression, we developed an Anastomotic Score system on postoperative Day 3 (AScore-POD3), which yielded high diagnostic efficacy in the primary cohort (the area under the curve (AUC) = 0.87). The predictive value of AScore-POD3 was validated in the validation cohort, and its AUC was 0.83. We further built an AScore-POD3 based nomogram by combining the AScore-POD3 system with other clinical risk factors of AL. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.93 in the primary cohort and 0.82 in the validation cohort. Our study suggests that AL can be early diagnosed after gastric cancer surgery by measuring drainage IFs.

Purpose Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains a devastating complication following low anterior resection (LAR) for left colorectal cancer. Previous studies have identified several factors to predict it. However, evidence seems conflicting, especially in the role of diverting stoma (DS). In this prospective cohort study, we specifically defined intra-abdominal infection (IAI) and AL to determine risk factors and the effectiveness of DS. Methods 182 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer undergoing LAR from January 2017 to December 2020 were included in our analysis and divided into IAI, including AL and other IAI, or non-IAI group. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory information were collected. We carried out univariate and multivariate logistic regression models to identify predictors of IAI, AL and other IAI. Results Twenty-two of 182 patients (12.1%) developed IAI; of 22, 14 developed AL. IAI was associated with prolonged hospital stay (median 26 days vs 13 of non-IAI; P

Background Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication after colorectal surgery. This study aimed to investigate a method for the early diagnosis of AL after surgical resection by analysing inflammatory factors (IFs) in peritoneal drainage fluid. Methods Abdominal drainage fluid of patients with colorectal cancer who underwent resection between April 2017 and April 2018, were prospectively collected in the postoperative interval. Six IFs, including interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-10, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)2, and MMP9, in drainage were determined by multiplex immunoassay to investigate AL (in patients undergoing resection and anastomosis) and pelvic collection (in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection). Sparreboom and colleagues’ prediction model was first evaluated for AL/pelvic collection, followed by a new IF-based score system (AScore) that was developed by a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, for the same outcomes. The model performance was tested for the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV). Results Out of 123 patients eligible, 119 patients were selected, including 12 patients with AL/pelvic collection. Sparreboom and colleagues’ prediction model was documented with the best diagnostic efficacy on postoperative day 3 (POD3), with an AUC of 0.77. After optimization, AScore on POD3 increased the AUC to 0.83 and on POD1 showed the best diagnostic efficiency, with an AUC of 0.88. Based on the Youden index, the cut-off value of AScore on POD1 was set as −2.46 to stratify patients into low-risk and high-risk groups for AL/pelvic collection. The model showed 90.0 per cent sensitivity, 69.7 per cent specificity, 98.4 per cent NPV, and 25.0 per cent PPV. Conclusions The early determination of IFs in abdominal drainage fluid of patients undergoing colorectal surgery could be useful to predict AL or pelvic collection.

Background. In laparoscopic incisional hernia repair, direct contact between the prosthesis and abdominal viscera is inevitable and may lead to adhesions. Despite the large variety of mesh prosthesis, little is known about their in vivo behavior. Biological meshes are considered to have many advantages, but due to their price they are rarely used. A rat model was used to assess biological and conventional synthetic meshes on their in vivo characteristics. Design. One-hundred twenty male Wistar rats were randomized into five groups of 24 rats. A mesh was implanted intraperitoneally and fixated with nonresorbable sutures. The following five meshes were implanted: Parietene (polypropylene), Permacol (cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix), Strattice (non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix), XCM Biologic (non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix), and Omyra Mesh (condensed polytetrafluoroethylene). The rats were sacrificed after 30, 90, or 180 days. Incorporation, shrinkage, adhesions, abscess formation, and histology were assessed for all meshes. Results. All animals thrived postoperatively. After 180 days, Permacol, Parietene, and Omyra Mesh had a significantly better incorporation than Strattice ( P = .001, P = .019, and P = .037 respectively). After 180 days, Strattice had significantly fewer adhesions on the surface of the mesh than Parietene ( P < .001), Omyra Mesh ( P = .011), and Permacol ( P = .027). After 30 days, Permacol had significantly stronger adhesions than Strattice ( P = .030). However, this difference was not significant anymore after 180 days. After 180 days, there was significantly less shrinkage in Permacol than in Strattice ( P = .001) and Omyra Mesh ( P = .050). Conclusion. Based on incorporation, adhesions, mesh shrinkage, and histologic parameters, Strattice performed best in this experimental rat model.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the health economics of patients with sepsis after gastrointestinal tumor operation in ICU. METHODS: This case-control study used 1:1 propensity-score (PS) matched method and patients were matched according to tumor type, age and gender. The study group was composed of 181 patients with sepsis after operation of gastrointestinal tumor in ICU, while the control group was composed of 181 patients without sepsis after operation of gastrointestinal tumor. The medical expenses and length of stay in the hospital of these patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The median of the total hospitalization cost for the study group was $26,038, which was 1.7 times of the control group (P

BACKGROUND There have been different reports on mortality of sepsis; however, few focus on the prognosis of patients with sepsis after surgery. AIM To study the clinical features and prognostic predictors in patients with sepsis after gastrointestinal tumor surgery in intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS We retrospectively screened patients who underwent gastrointestinal tumor surgery at Peking University Cancer Hospital from January 2015 to December 2019. Among them, 181 patients who were diagnosed with sepsis in ICU were included in our study. Survival was analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate adjusted analyses were performed to identify predictors of prognosis. RESULTS The 90-d all-cause mortality rate was 11.1% in our study. Univariate analysis showed that body mass index (BMI), shock within 48 h after ICU admission, leukocyte count, lymphocyte to neutrophil ratio, international normalized ratio, creatinine, procalcitonin, lactic acid, oxygenation index, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score within 24 h after ICU admission might be all significantly associated with the prognosis of sepsis after gastrointestinal tumor surgery. In multiple analysis, we found that BMI ≤ 20 kg/m2, lactic acid after ICU admission, and SOFA score within 24 h after ICU admission might be independent risk predictors of the prognosis of sepsis after gastrointestinal tumor surgery. Compared with SOFA score, SOFA score combined with BMI and lactic acid might have higher predictive ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.859; 95% confidence interval, 0.789-0.929). CONCLUSION Lactic acid and SOFA score within 24 h after ICU admission are independent risk predictors of the prognosis of sepsis after gastrointestinal tumor surgery. SOFA score combined with BMI and lactic acid might have good predictive value.

Background: With the popularization of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), identifying patients with complications before discharging becomes important. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of C-reactive protein (CRP) in predicting infectious complications after gastrectomy. Methods: Patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy at Beijing Cancer Hospital from March 2017 to April 2018 were enrolled in the training set. Complications were prospectively registered. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CRP via evaluating the area under the curve (AUC). Patients who had CRP tested on postoperative day (POD) 5 and accepted gastrectomy from April to December 2018 were included in the validation set to validate the cut-off value of CRP obtained from the training set. Results: A total of 350 patients were included (263 patients in the training set and 87 patients in the validation set). Out of these, 24 patients were diagnosed with infectious complications and 17 patients had anastomotic leakage in the training set. The CRP level on POD5 had superior diagnostic accuracy for infectious complications with an AUC of 0.81. The cut-off value of CRP on POD5 at 166.65 mg/L yielded 93% specificity and 97.2% negative predict value (NPV); For anastomotic leakage, the AUC of CRP on POD5 was 0.81. Using the cut-off value of CRP at 166.65 mg/L on POD5 achieved 92% specificity and 98.6% NPV. The optimal cut-off value (CRP 166.65 mg/L on POD5) was validated in the validation set. It achieved 97.5% specificity and 94.0% NPV for infectious complications, and 97.6% specificity and 96.4% NPV for anastomotic leakage. Conclusion: CRP is a reliable predictive marker for the diagnosis of inflammatory complications following gastric surgery. However, this study was based on preliminary data. The validity of this data needs confirmation by a larger number of cases.

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has become the main trend in gastrointestinal surgery. The aim of this study is to investigate factors influencing the decision-making of nasogastric tube (NGT) placement and its safety and efficacy in clinical practice. Methods: We analyzed our prospectively maintained database including 287 patients underwent elective gastrectomy in our department from January 1 to December 31, 2017. All cases were divided into two groups, namely, the non-nasogastric tube group and the nasogastric tube group. Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors that affect the decision of nasogastric tube placement, and propensity score matching (PSM) was later applied to balance those factors for the analysis of the safety outcomes between the groups. Results: Multivariate analysis showed that resection range ( p =0.004, proximal gastrectomy: OR=4.555, 95%CI=1.392-14.905, p =0.016; total gastrectomy: OR=1.990, 95%CI=1.205-3.287, p =0.009) was the only independent risk factors of nasogastric tube placement. NGT was omitted in the majority (58.8%) of distal gastrectomy, but only in 42.5% and 25% in total and proximal gastrectomy. After PSM, we found no significant differences between patients with or without NGT in postoperative hospital stay, time to first flatus and defecation, time to fluid and semi-fluid diet, rate of reinsertion, or hospitalization expenditure (p>0.05 respectively). The incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups were 21.7% and 23.5% respectively ( p =0.753), and the incidence of major complications were 7.0% and 9.6% ( p =0.472). Conclusions: The decision-making of NGT placement is mainly influenced by the resection range. Omitting NGT is a safe approach in all types of gastrectomy but was not able to enhance the recovery in our practice.

Supplemental material, Supplementary_material for Clinical predictive efficacy of C-reactive protein for diagnosing infectious complications after gastric surgery by Jinyao Shi, Zhouqiao Wu, Qi Wang, Yan Zhang, Fei Shan, Shiyang Hou, Xiangji Ying, Longtao Huangfu, Ziyu Li and Jiafu Ji in Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has become the main trend in gastrointestinal surgery. The aim of this study is to investigate factors influencing the decision-making of nasogastric tube (NGT) placement and its safety and efficacy in clinical practice. Methods: We analyzed our prospectively maintained database including 287 patients underwent elective gastrectomy in our department from January 1 to December 31, 2017. All cases were divided into two groups, namely, the non-nasogastric tube group and the nasogastric tube group. Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors that affect the decision of nasogastric tube placement, and propensity score matching (PSM) was later applied to balance those factors for the analysis of the safety outcomes between the groups. Results: Multivariate analysis showed that resection range (p=0.004, proximal gastrectomy: OR=4.555, 95%CI=1.392-14.905, p=0.016; total gastrectomy: OR=1.990, 95%CI=1.205-3.287, p=0.009) was the only independent risk factors of nasogastric tube placement. NGT was omitted in the majority (58.8%) of distal gastrectomy, but only in 42.5% and 25% in total and proximal gastrectomy. After PSM, we found no significant differences between patients with or without NGT in postoperative hospital stay, time to first flatus and defecation, time to fluid and semi-fluid diet, rate of reinsertion, or hospitalization expenditure (p>0.05 respectively). The incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups were 21.7% and 23.5% respectively (p=0.753), and the incidence of major complications were 7.0% and 9.6% (p=0.472). Conclusions: The decision-making of NGT placement is mainly influenced by the resection range. Omitting NGT is a safe approach in all types of gastrectomy but was not able to enhance the recovery in our practice.

Short-course preoperative radiotherapy is indicated in patients with resectable rectal cancer to control local recurrence. Although no clear evidence is available, short-course radiotherapy with operation within a week is common practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of timing of operation for rectal cancer after short-course radiotherapy on anastomotic leakage.Data from the Dutch Colorectal Audit were used. All patients who received short-course preoperative radiotherapy and underwent elective operation within 14 days for rectal cancer between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2016 were included. Interval between radiotherapy and operation was calculated by extracting date of start of radiotherapy from the date of operation. Patients were divided into short interval (4 days) and long interval (4 or more days). The interval and other patient or perioperative parameters were included in univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify independent associations with anastomotic leakage.In total, 2,131 patients were eligible for analysis: 1,055 (49.5%) patients had operations4 days after radiotherapy and 1,076 (50.5%) patients had operations after 4 or more days. One hundred and eighty-five (8.7%) patients experienced anastomotic leakage. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was significantly higher in patients who underwent operation within4 days (10.1% vs 7.2%; p = 0.018). In the multivariable analysis, an interval of4 days was significantly associated with anastomotic leakage (odds ratio 1.438; 95% CI 1.054 to 1.962; p = 0.022).Elective surgery for rectal cancer4 days after preoperative short-course radiotherapy resulted in an increase of anastomotic leakage.

The aim of this pilot study is to investigate the ability of an electronic nose (e-nose) to distinguish malignant gastric histology from healthy controls in exhaled breath. In a period of 3 weeks, all preoperative gastric carcinoma (GC) patients (n = 16) in the Beijing Oncology Hospital were asked to participate in the study. The control group (n = 28) consisted of family members screened by endoscopy and healthy volunteers. The e-nose consists of 3 sensors with which volatile organic compounds in the exhaled air react. Real-time analysis takes place within the e-nose, and binary data are exported and interpreted by an artificial neuronal network. This is a self-learning computational system. The inclusion rate of the study was 100%. Baseline characteristics differed significantly only for age: the average age of the patient group was 57 years and that of the healthy control group 37 years ( P value = .000). Weight loss was the only significant different symptom ( P value = .040). A total of 16 patients and 28 controls were included; 13 proved to be true positive and 20 proved to be true negative. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 71%, with an accuracy of 75%. These results give a positive predictive value of 62% and a negative predictive value of 87%. This pilot study shows that the e-nose has the capability of diagnosing GC based on exhaled air, with promising predictive values for a screening purpose.

This study aims to evaluate the new ypTNM staging system in Chinese gastric cancer patients. We conducted retrospective survival and regression analyses using a database of gastric cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute from January 2007 to January 2015. A total of 473 patients were included in the study with 28 pathological complete response (pCR) cases, 3 ypT0N1 cases, 65 stage I cases, 126 stage II cases, and 251 stage III cases. The pCR cases had similar survival to stage I patients (p > 0.05). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of stage I, II and III patients were significantly different (3-year DFS: 89.0, 75.5, and 39.6%, p

Purpose When postoperative ileus is not resolved after 5 days or recurs after resolution, prolonged POI (PPOI) is diagnosed. PPOI increases discomfort, morbidity and hospitalisation length, and is mainly caused by an inflammatory response following intestinal manipulation. This response can be weakened by targeting the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, with nicotine as essential regulator. Chewing gum, already known to stimulate gastrointestinal motility itself, combined with nicotine is hypothesised to improve gastrointestinal recovery and prevent PPOI. This pilot study is the first to assess efficacy and safety of nicotine gum in colorectal surgery. Methods Patients undergoing elective oncological colorectal surgery were enrolled in this double-blind, parallel-group, controlled trial and randomly assigned to a treatment protocol with normal or nicotine gum (2 mg). Patient reported outcomes (PROMS), clinical characteristics and blood samples were collected. Primary endpoint was defined as time to first passage of faeces and toleration of solid food for at least 24 h. Results In total, 40 patients were enrolled (20 vs. 20). In both groups, six patients developed PPOI. Time to primary endpoint (4.50 [3.00–7.25] vs. 3.50 days [3.00–4.25], p = 0.398) and length of stay (5.50 [4.00–8.50] vs. 4.50 days [4.00–6.00], p = 0.738) did not differ significantly between normal and nicotine gum. There were no differences in PROMS, inflammatory parameters and postoperative complications. Conclusions We proved nicotine gum to be safe but ineffective in improving gastrointestinal recovery and prevention of PPOI after colorectal surgery. Other dosages and administration routes of nicotine should be tested in future research. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00384-017-2839-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background Previous experimental studies on cyanoacrylate (CA) glue for the prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL) have shown promising results. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of CA in prevention of leakage in a porcine model of ischemic colorectal AL. Methods Twenty-four animals were divided into four groups of six: (1)ischemic anastomosis with sufficient suture (ISCH), (2)ischemic anastomosis with sufficient suture and CA reinforcement (CA-ISCH), (3)ischemic anastomosis with insufficient suture (ISCH-AI), and (4)ischemic anastomosis with insufficient suture and CA reinforcement (CA-ISCH-AI). In CA groups, N -butyl-2-cyanoacrylate was applied between the colon ends. Anastomotic bursting pressure, abscess formation, and adhesion formation were evaluated on postoperative day 7. Tissue samples were obtained for histologic evaluation of foreign body reaction. Results The AL rate was 4 of 6 (67%) in the ISCH-AI group compared with none in the other three groups. The ISCH and ISCH-AI groups had significantly higher AL scores compared with the CA groups. The mean anastomotic bursting pressure was 167 ± 54 mm Hg in the ISCH-group versus 213 ± 43 mm Hg in the CA-ISCH-group ( P = nonsignificant) and 145 ± 102 mm Hg in the ISCH-AI group versus 187 ± 19 mm Hg in the CA-ISCH-AI group ( P = nonsignificant). The average adhesion score was significantly higher in the ISCH group than in the CA-ISCH group (4.2 ± 1.3 versus 1.7 ± 0.82; P = 0.019). Stricture of the anastomosis occurred only in the non-CA groups (3/12, 25%). Conclusions Anastomotic reinforcement with CA is effective and safe to prevent leakage in a high-risk colorectal anastomosis in a porcine model.

Background: The objective of this study is to identify independent risks and protective factors and to construct a mortality prediction model for gastrectomy in the Chinese population. Study design: This is a population-based prospective cohort at an institutional level. Seventy-two participating hospitals reported their annual gastrectomy data between 2014 and 2016, while 44 variables covering the institution and surgical information were included in the analysis. We used R software to encode and complete data pre-processing. The first difference model was applied to build the risk model. Data from 2014 and 2015 were assigned to risk model development, while data from 2016 was used for validation. Results: In the included centers with 94,277 gastric cancer cases, the in-hospital mortality rate was 0.32%. The regression model revealed that provinces with low-middle GDP, hospitals with annual gastrectomy volume between 100 and 500, greater volume of urgent surgeries performed, larger proportion of males, and a higher proportion of liver metastasis were independent risk factors for mortality following gastric surgeries, while higher laparoscopic resection volume, greater volume of distal gastrectomy with B2 reconstruction, and larger proportion of palliative surgery were independent protective factors (p < 0.05, respectively). In the prediction test, the mean square error of the training set was 0.948, while that of the test set was 0.728, demonstrating the effectiveness of this model. Conclusions: We constructed the first mortality risk prediction model for gastric cancer surgery in the Chinese population. The identified risk factors will help with the therapy selection, while further informing Chinese medical policy decision-makers.

AIM: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most feared complications after rectal resection. This study aimed to assess a combination of biomarkers for early detection of AL after rectal cancer resection. METHOD: This study was an international multicentre prospective cohort study. All patients received a pelvic drain after rectal cancer resection. On the first three postoperative days drain fluid was collected daily and C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2), MMP9, glucose, lactate, interleukin 1-beta (IL1β), IL6, IL10, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and amylase were measured in the drain fluid. Prediction models for AL were built for each postoperative day using multivariate penalized logistic regression. Model performance was estimated by the c-index for discrimination. The model with the best performance was visualized with a nomogram and calibration was plotted. RESULTS: A total of 292 patients were analysed; 38 (13.0%) patients suffered from AL, with a median interval to diagnosis of 6.0 (interquartile ratio 4.0-14.8) days. AL occurred less often after partial than after total mesorectal excision (4.9% vs 15.2%, P = 0.035). Of all patients with AL, 26 (68.4%) required reoperation. AL was more often treated by reoperation in patients without a diverting ileostomy (18/20 vs 8/18, P = 0.03). The prediction model for postoperative day 1 included MMP9, TNFα, diverting ileostomy and surgical technique (c-index = 0.71). The prediction model for postoperative day 2 only included CRP (c-index = 0.69). The prediction model for postoperative day 3 included CRP and MMP9 and obtained the best model performance (c-index = 0.78). CONCLUSION: The combination of serum CRP and peritoneal MMP9 may be useful for earlier prediction of AL after rectal cancer resection. In clinical practice, this combination of biomarkers should be interpreted in the clinical context as with any other diagnostic tool. ispartof: COLORECTAL DISEASE vol:22 issue:1 pages:36-45 ispartof: location:England status: published

Supplemental material, SUPPLEMENTARY_DATA for Non-Cross-Linked Collagen Mesh Performs Best in a Physiologic, Noncontaminated Rat Model by Ruth Kaufmann, An P. Jairam, Irene M. Mulder, Zhouqiao Wu, Joost Verhelst, Sandra Vennix, Louis J. X. Giesen, Marian C. Clahsen-van Groningen, Johannes Jeekel and Johan F. Lange in Surgical Innovation

Table S1. Univariate analysis of clinical and pathological characteristics associated with using ypTNM stage and patient survival. Figure S1. Adjusted comparative prognosis implication of ypTNM vs yTNM on overall survival in unmatched cohorts of patients with gastric cancer, stratified by detailed TNM stage (DOCX 1083 kb)

Supplemental material, Figures_S1_to_S6_-_R1 for Non-Cross-Linked Collagen Mesh Performs Best in a Physiologic, Noncontaminated Rat Model by Ruth Kaufmann, An P. Jairam, Irene M. Mulder, Zhouqiao Wu, Joost Verhelst, Sandra Vennix, Louis J. X. Giesen, Marian C. Clahsen-van Groningen, Johannes Jeekel and Johan F. Lange in Surgical Innovation

Background Pathological stage is considered as the best prognosis indicator for gastric cancer. With the increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), the latest TNM staging included a new pathological stage of ypTNM for patients with NACT. However, no study has investigated if ypTNM stage has the same prognostic implication as pTNM stage for gastric cancer. Methods We retrospectively selected eligible patients within a prospectively maintained database containing all patients treated with gastric cancer in Peking University Cancer Hospital from 2007 to 2015 using overall survival as the outcome. Patients using ypTNM and pTNM were 1:1 matched by propensity scores (PS) calculated from a model containing variables associated with ypTNM use or survival. Overall survival was compared by unconditional Cox regression. Conventional multivariate analysis was conducted to corroborate PS matching results. Results 1441 patients were included in the analysis with a median follow-up of 37 months (range = 2–106). The matched sample contained 756 patients. After PS matching, patients with specific ypTNM stage were 1.34 (95%CI = 1.05–1.72, P = 0.019) times more likely to die than patients with the same pTNM stage. Similar to the results of PS matching, multivariate Cox regression yielded a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.35 (95%CI = 1.09–1.67, P = 0.006). Subgroup analysis indicated this survival difference between ypTNM and pTNM stage varied by the specific TNM stage of patients. The HR was 3.44 (95%CI = 1.06–11.18, P = 0.040) and 1.28 (95%CI = 1.00–1.62, P = 0.048) for patients in stage I and III, respectively; whereas for stage II patients, no significant difference was observed (HR = 1.37, 95%CI = 0.78–2.38, P = 0.27). Conclusion Gastric cancer patients with specific ypTNM stage had worse prognosis compared to those at the same stage defined by pTNM. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5283-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objective The intra-operative air leak test (ALT) is a common intraoperative test used to identify mechanically insufficient anastomosis. This meta-analysis aims to determine whether ALT aids to the reduction of postoperative colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL). Methods A literature search was performed to select studies in acknowledged databases. Full text articles targeting ALT during colorectal surgery were included. Quality assessment, risk of bias, and the level-of-evidence of the inclusions were evaluated. ALT methodology, ALT(+) (i.e., leak observed during the test) rate, and postoperative CAL rate of the included studies were subsequently analyzed. Results Twenty studies were included for analysis, in which we found substantial risks of bias. A lower CAL rate was observed in patients who underwent ALT than those did not; however, the difference was not significant (p = 0.15). The intraoperative ALT(+) rate greatly varied among the included studies from 1.5 to 24.7 %. ALT(+) patients possessed a significantly higher CAL rate than the ALT(−) patients (11.4 vs. 4.2 %, p

Background This study was designed to evaluate the impact of postoperative major complications on long-term survival following curative gastrectomy. Methods This retrospective study included 239 patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy at the Beijing Cancer Hospital from February 2012 to January 2013. Survival curves were compared between patients with major complications (mC group) and those without major complications (NmC group). Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify independent prognostic factors. Results Postoperative complication and mortality rates were 24.7 and 0.8%, respectively. The severity of complications was graded in accordance with the Clavien–Dindo classification. The incidence of minor complications (grades I-II) and major complications (grades III–V) was 9.2 and 15.5%, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were better in the NmC group than in the mC group (p = 0.014, p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis identified major complications as an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS. After stratification by pathological stage, this trend was also observed in stage II patients. Conclusions Postoperative major complications adversely affect OS and DFS. The prevention and early diagnosis of complications are essential to minimize the negative effects of complications on surgical safety and long-term patient survival.

Anastomotic leakage is one of the most serious complications of colorectal surgery. Despite progress in available surgical techniques, the morbidity associated with anastomotic leakage remains high. In this review, we summarize the current clinical status of this complication, the problems it causes, and relevant research achievements. To date, a lack of consensus regarding the diagnosis of anastomotic leakage has resulted in varying rates of diagnosis across countries and regions worldwide. Accurately predicting the occurrence of anastomotic leakage using the established risk factors and preoperative scoring systems remains difficult. Many of the described preventive measures, including defunctioning stoma creation, positive air leak testing, and use of effective tissue adhesives, remain controversial; more evidence-based medical information is urgently needed. Delayed diagnoses of anastomotic leakage also remain common in clinical practice. To prevent catastrophic outcomes, such as reoperations or deaths, early diagnosis is critically important. Parameters local to the area of the anastomosis may facilitate early detection of leakage, but their effectiveness is subject to clinical validation. Lastly, the pathological etiology of anastomotic leakage remains to be determined, and its elucidation may inspire innovative interventions that solve this critical surgical complication.

Aim. Postoperative ileus (POI) is common after surgery. Animal studies indicate that the POI mechanism involves an inflammatory response, which is also activated during postoperative complications. This study aimed to determine whether inflammatory biomarkers might facilitate an early detection of prolonged POI (PPOI) or infectious complications. Methods. Forty-seven adult patients who underwent oncological colorectal surgery were included. They filled out a perioperative diary to report their gastrointestinal symptoms. Blood samples were collected preoperatively, and on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 3. Levels of leucocytes, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β were analyzed. Results. Patients with PPOI had significantly longer stay in hospital than patients without (13.6 ± 10.5 versus 7.4 ± 3.2 days, p<0.001); they also had higher levels of IL-6 ratios, leucocytes, and CRP levels, but did not reach significance. Higher levels of postoperative IL-6 and CRP levels (p<0.05, resp.) were found in patients with infectious complications. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis found better diagnostic values of IL-6 ratio on both POD 1 and 3 than that of CRP (POD 1: ROC 0.825, p<0.001). Conclusion. Blood levels of inflammatory cytokines cannot predict PPOI after colorectal surgery. Instead, postoperative IL-6 changes may predict the infectious complications with a better diagnostic value than the current leukocytes or CRP tests.

Introduction. Perioperative bowel perfusion (local hemodynamic index [LHI]) was measured with a miniaturized dynamic light scattering (mDLS) device, aiming to determine whether anastomotic perfusion correlates with the anastomotic healing process and whether LHI measurement assists in the detection of anastomotic leakage (AL) in colorectal surgery. Methods. A partial colectomy was performed in 21 male Wistar rats. Colonic and anastomotic LHIs were recorded during operation. On postoperative day (POD) 3, the rats were examined for AL manifestations. Anastomotic LHI was recorded before determining the anastomotic bursting pressure (ABP). The postoperative LHI measurements were repeated in 15 other rats with experimental colitis. Clinical manifestations and anastomotic LHI were also determined on POD3. Diagnostic value of LHI measurement was analyzed with the combined data from both experiments. Results. Intraoperative LHI measurement showed no correlation with the ABP on POD3. Postoperative anastomotic LHI on POD3 was significantly correlated with ABP in the normal rats ( R2 = 0.52; P < .001) and in the rats with colitis ( R2 = 0.63; P = .0012). Anastomotic LHI on POD3 had high accuracy for identifying ABP

Background Anastomotic leakage after gastrointestinal surgery remains a challenging clinical problem. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of TissuCol (fibrin glue), Histoacryl Flex (n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate), and Duraseal (polyethylene glycol) on colorectal anastomotic healing during experimental colitis. Methods We first performed colectomy 7 days after 10 mg trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis to validate a rat TNBS-colitis-colectomy model. Subsequently, this TNBS-colitis-colectomy model was used in 73 Wistar rats that were stratified into a colitis group (CG, no adhesive), a TissuCol group (TG), a Histoacryl group (HG), and a Duraseal group (DG). Anastomotic sealant was applied with one adhesive after constructing an end-to-end hand-sewn anastomosis. Clinical manifestations, anastomotic bursting pressure, and immunohistochemistry of macrophage type-one (M1) and type-two (M2) was performed on postoperative day (POD)3 or POD7. Results TNBS-caused mucosal and submucosal colon damage and compromised anastomotic healing (i.e., abscess formation and low anastomotic bursting pressure). On POD3, higher severity of abscesses was seen in CG. Average anastomotic bursting pressure was 53.2 ± 35.5 mm Hg in CG, which was significantly lower than HG (134.4 ± 27.5 mm Hg) and DG (95.1 ± 54.3 mm Hg) but not TG (83.4 ± 46.7 mm Hg). Furthermore, a significantly higher M2/M1 index was found in HG. On POD7, abscesses were only seen in CG (6/9) but not in other groups; HG had the lowest severity of adhesion. Conclusions We describe the first surgical IBD model by performing colectomy in rats with TNBS-induced colitis, which causes intra-abdominal abscess formation and compromises anastomotic healing. Anastomotic sealing with Histoacryl Flex prevents these complications in this model. Alternative activation of macrophages seems to be involved in its influence on anastomotic healing.

Background: This systematic review summarizes evidence regarding clinical endpoints, early detection, and differential diagnosis of postoperative ileus (POI). Methods: Using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web-of-Science, we identified 2,084 articles. Risk of bias and level of evidence (LOE) of the included articles were determined, and relevant results were summarized. Results: Eleven articles were included, most of which with substantial risks of bias. Bowel motility studies revealed that defecation together with solid food tolerance is the most representative clinical endpoint of POI (LOE: 2b); other clinical signs (e.g. bowel sounds, passage of flatus) did not correlate with a full recovery of bowel motility. Inflammatory parameters including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1, and TNF-α might assist in an early detection of prolonged POI (LOE: 4). Clinical manifestations (e.g. nausea, vomiting, abdominal distension, bowel sounds, flatus) and X-ray examinations provided limited aid to the differential diagnosis of POI, while CT with Gastrografin had the best specificity and sensitivity (both 100%; LOE: 1c). Conclusions: Postoperative defecation together with tolerance of solid food intake seems to be the best clinical endpoint of POI. CT has the best differential diagnostic value between POI and other complications. Prospective studies with a high LOE are in great need. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

AIMTo determine the level of consensus on the definition of colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) among Dutch and Chinese colorectal surgeons.METHODSDutch and Chinese colorectal surgeons were asked to partake in an online questionnaire. Consensus in the online questionnaire was defined as > 80% agreement between respondents on various statements regarding a general definition of CAL, and regarding clinical and radiological diagnosis of the complication.RESULTSFifty-nine Dutch and 202 Chinese dedicated colorectal surgeons participated in the online survey. Consensus was found on only one of the proposed elements of a general definition of CAL in both countries: 'extravasation of contrast medium after rectal enema on a CT scan'. Another two were found relevant according to Dutch surgeons: 'necrosis of the anastomosis found during reoperation', and 'a radiological collection treated with percutaneous drainage'. No consensus was found for all other proposed elements that may be included in a general definition.CONCLUSIONThere is no universally accepted definition of CAL in the Netherlands and China. Diagnosis of CAL based on clinical manifestations remains a point of discussion in both countries. Dutch surgeons are more likely to report 'subclinical' leaks as CAL, which partly explains the higher reported Dutch CAL rates.

Complications significantly postpone postoperative recovery and increase mortality after gastric cancer surgery. However, varied complication rates have been reported in the literature as well as in our annual report of China Gastrointestinal Oncological Surgery League. It appears that there have been some misunderstandings regarding the diagnosis and interventions as well as the etiology of major complications. We should be aware of the fact that reaching worldwide consensus for the diagnostic criteria is a difficult task in most complications, which disabled the possibility of data comparison among different studies in most cases. Disagreements among the Chinese and western surgeons in the complication diagnosis should also be acknowledged when interpreting data from both ends. The western colleagues appreciate more latent manifestations of the complications, which eventually lead to earlier and more aggressive examinations and interventions. We, together with all Chinese centers, need to acknowledge the differences, ensure the integrity of our reported data while proposing respective countermeasures. Although the complication registration may continue to differ among centers, we can register complications with the intervention details so that the reported complications can be classified with the same standard (i.e. Clavien-Dindo scoring system). We should also encourage multi-center collaborations and trials, which facilitate the standardization of complication diagnosis and registration. Recognizing the difficulty and long-course nature of reaching national or even international consensus, we continue aiming at the ultimate goal with our best effort.

To analyze the change in postoperative complication rate after gastric cancer surgery registered in the Peking University Cancer Hospital in recent 11 years and the learning curve of complication registration, and to investigate how to improve the complication registration and evaluation in gastric cancer surgery.Patients who underwent open or laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery between April 14, 2005 and February 15, 2016 in our institution were included in the study, and those without essential clinical and administrative data were excluded. Data were biennially collected, and linear regression was performed to investigate the changes of the following parameters, including overall complication rate, severe complication proportion (proportion of complications with Clavien-Dindo score ≥III(a in the total registered complications), re-operation rate and the major complication rate.A total of 5 666 patients were included in the analysis, with 4 111 males (72.56%) and 1 555 females (27.44%). The average age was (58.87±11.50) years and average BMI was(23.15±3.30) kg/mAccording to the data from our institution in the recent 11 years, a learning curve exists in our institution for complication registration in gastric cancer surgery. The administrative data appears to be more reliable than registered complication data in quality and safety evaluation during the learning period. A detailed classification with the Clavien-Dindo score aids to the use of complication data for the quality and safety measurement.

Postoperative complications are important outcome measurements for surgical quality and safety control. However, the complication registration has always been problematic due to the lack of definition consensus and the other practical difficulties. This narrative review summarizes the data registry system for single institutional registry, national data registry, international multi-center trial registries in the western world, aiming to share the experience of complication classification and data registration. We interviewed Dr. Koh from Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Australia for single institutional experience, Dr. van der Wielen and Dr. Desideriofor, from two international multi-center trial(STOMACH) and registry (IMIGASTRIC) respectively, and Prof. Dr. Wijnhoven from the Dutch Upper GI Audit(DUCA). The major questions include which complications are obligated to report in the respective registry, what are the definitions of those complications, who perform the registration, and how are the complications evaluated or classified. Four telephone conferences were initiated to discuss the above-mentioned topics. The DUCA and IMGASTRIC provided the definition of the major complications. The consent definition provided by DUCA was based on the LOW classification which came out after a four-year discussion and consensus meeting among international experts in the according field. However, none of the four registries asked for an obligatory standardization of the diagnostic criteria among the participating centers or surgeons. Instead, all the registries required a detailed recording of the diagnostic strategy and classification of the complications with the Clavien-Dindo scoring system. Most data were registered by surgeons or data managers during or immediately after the hospitalization. The investigators or an independent third party conducted the auditing of the data quality. Standardization of complication diagnosis among different centers is a difficult task, consuming much effort and time. On top of that, standardization of the complication registration is of critical and practical importance. We encourage all centers to register complications with the diagnostic criteria and following intervention. Based on this, the Clavien-Dindo classification can be properly justified, which has been widely accepted by most centers and should be routinely used as the standard evaluation system for postoperative complications in gastric tumor surgery.