Search

Background: Glenoid component positioning is an important and challenging aspect of total shoulder arthroplasty. The use of freehand technique with standard instrumentation or preoperative planning based on 2-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans provides an opportunity for improvement in terms of component accuracy, precision, and deformity correction. These techniques have produced varying outcomes. Methods: Preoperative planning software (PPS), patient specific instrumentation (PSI), and intraoperative navigation (NAV) have been developed to improve the accuracy of implant placement and deformity correction with the ultimate goals of improved patient outcomes and implant longevity. Literature search was conducted on published and available studies comparing the accuracy of glenoid component placement and improvements in surgical and patient outcomes amongst the aforementioned techniques. Results: PPS, PSI, and NAV have demonstrated improved accuracy over freehand techniques with standard instrumentation. However, data demonstrating the clinical benefit and cost effectiveness of these new technologies are lacking. Discussion: In this paper, we reviewed the evidence available to answer the question of whether or not advanced shoulder arthroplasty technologies have been beneficial and reviewed future technologies in development such as virtual/mixed-reality and robotic assisted shoulder surgery. Level of Evidence: 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is minimal work defining the economic impact of resident participation in shoulder arthroplasty. Thus, this study quantified the opportunity cost of resident participation in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) by determining differences in operative time, relative value units (RVUs)/hour, and RVUs/case. Methods: A retrospective analysis of shoulder arthroplasty procedures were identified from the ACS-NSQIP database from 2006 to 2014 using CPT codes. Demographic, comorbidity, preoperative laboratory data and surgical procedure were used to develop matched cohorts. Mean differences in operative time, RVUs/case and RVUs/hour between attending-only (AO) cases and cases with resident involvement (RI) were examined. Cost analysis was performed to identify differences in RVUs generated per hour in dollars/case. Results: A total of 1786 AO and 1102 RI cases were identified. With the exception of PGY-3 and PGY-4 cases, RI cases had lower mean operative times compared to AO cases. The cost of RI was highest for PGY-3 ($199.87 per case) and PGY-4 ($9.2 9) residents with all other postgraduate years providing a cost reduction. Discussion: Involvement of residents was associated with shorter operative times leading to a savings of $29.64 per case. Involvement of intermediate-level (PGY-3) residents were associated with increased costs that ultimately decreased as residents became more senior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neck injuries in football are attributed to helmet-to-helmet contact with youth players being at greatest risk. In 2014, the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS) implemented rules defining illegal contact against a defenseless player above the shoulders to reduce head and neck injuries in football players. This study evaluates whether rule implementation decreased rates of high school football neck injuries presenting to the emergency department (ED) pre-rule implementation (2009–2013) to post-rule implementation (2015–2019). Data were queried from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System for high school football players 14 to 18 years old diagnosed with a neck injury from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2019. Narratives in the data were reviewed for mechanism of injury, setting, loss of consciousness (LOC), and type of injury. Between 2009 and 2019, an estimated 47,577 high school football neck injuries were diagnosed in EDs across the United States. 52.0% of neck injuries were sustained during competition compared to 48.0% during practice. A statistically significant (P = 0.004) decrease in neck injuries was realized from pre-rule implementation to post-rule implementation with averages of 5,278 and 3,481 injuries per year, respectively. Helmet-to-helmet neck injuries significantly (P = 0.04) decreased from pre- to post-rule implementation with averages of 851 and 508 injuries per year, respectively. Neck injuries sustained via other mechanisms were not affected by the 2014 rule implementation. This study is the first to identify a decrease in overall and helmet-to-helmet related neck injuries diagnosed in the ED following the 2014 NFHS targeting rule implementation. These findings add to the growing literature regarding the importance and efficacy of rule implementation in reducing sports-related neck injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective cohort analysis.Objective: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes of Coflex interspinous device versus laminectomy.Summary Of Background Data: Coflex Interlaminar Stabilization device (CID) is indicated for one- or two-level lumbar stenosis with grade 1 stable spondylolisthesis in adult patients, as an alternative to laminectomy, or laminectomy and fusion. CID provides stability against progressive spondylolisthesis, retains motion, and prevents further disc space collapse.Methods: Patients ≥18 years' old with lumbar stenosis and grade 1 stable spondylolisthesis who underwent either primary single-level decompression and implantation of CID, or single-level laminectomy alone were included with a minimum 90-day follow-up at a single academic institution. Clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative complications were reviewed until the latest follow-up. χ2 and independent samples t tests were used for analysis.Results: Eighty-three patients (2007-2019) were included: 37 cases of single-level laminectomy (48.6% female) were compared to 46 single-level CID (50% female). CID cohort was older (CID 69.0 ± 9.4 vs. laminectomy 64.2 ± 11.0, P = 0.042) and had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (CID 2.59 ± 0.73 vs. laminectomy 2.17 ± 0.48, P = 0.020). CID patients had higher estimated blood loss (EBL) (97.50 ± 77.76 vs. 52.84 ± 50.63 mL, P = 0.004), longer operative time (141.91 ± 47.88 vs. 106.81 ± 41.30 minutes, P = 0.001), and longer length of stay (2.0 ± 1.5 vs. 1.1 ± 1.0 days, P = 0.001). Total perioperative complications (21.7% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.035) and instrumentation-related complication was higher in CID (10.9% vs. 0% laminectomy group, P = 0.039). There were no other significant differences between the groups in demographics or outcomes.Conclusion: Single-level CID devices had higher perioperative 90-day complications, longer operative time, length of stay, higher EBL compared to laminectomies alone. Similar overall revision and neurologic complication rates were noted compared to laminectomy at last follow-up.Level of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]