Search

FAM64A is a mitotic regulator which promotes cell metaphase-anaphase transition and is highly expressed in a cell-cycle-dependent manner. In this study, we examined the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of FAM64A mRNA expression in gynecological cancers. We conducted a bioinformatics analysis of FAM64A mRNA expression using Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), xiantao, The University of ALabama at Birmingham CANcer data analysis Portal (UALCAN), and Kaplan-Meier (KM) plotter databases. FAM64A expression was elevated in breast, cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers when compared with normal tissue. Expression was positively correlated with white race, low T stages, infiltrating ductal carcinoma, or favourable PAM50 classification in breast cancer patients, and with clinical stage, histological grade and TP53 mutation, and endometrial cancer serous subtype. FAM64A expression was negatively associated with overall and/or recurrence-free survival rates in breast and endometrial cancer patients, while the opposite was observed in cervical and ovarian cancer patients. FAM64A functioned as an independent predictor of overall and disease-specific survival in breast cancer patients. FAM64A-correlated genes were involved in ligand-receptor interactions, and chromosomal, cell cycle, and DNA replication processes in breast, cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancers. Top hub genes primarily included cell cycle-related proteins in breast cancer, mucins and acetylgalactosaminyl transferases in cervical cancer, kinesin family members in endometrial cancer, and synovial sarcoma X and the cancer/testis antigen in ovarian cancer. FAM64A mRNA expression was positively related to Th2 cell infiltration, but negatively associated with neutrophil and Th17 cell infiltration in breast, cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers. FAM64A expression may be considered a potential biomarker reflecting carcinogenesis, histogenesis, aggressive behaviour, and prognosis in gynecological cancers. What is already known on this subject? FAM64A is located in cell nucleolar and nucleoplasmic regions, and during mitosis it putatively controls metaphase-to-anaphase transition. FAM64A appears to regulate different physiological processes, including apoptosis, tumorigenesis, neural differentiation, stress responses, and the cell cycle. Whatthe results of this study add?FAM64A expression was up-regulated in breast, cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers, and positively correlated with white race, low T stages, infiltrating ductal carcinoma, or favourable PAM50 classification in breast cancer patients, and with clinical stage, histological grade, and TP53 mutation, and a serous subtype in endometrial cancer. FAM64A expression was negatively associated with overall and/or recurrence-free survival rates in breast and endometrial cancer patients, while the opposite was observed in cervical and ovarian cancer patients. FAM64A functioned as an independent predictor of overall and disease-specific survival in breast cancer. FAM64A-correlated genes were involved in ligand-receptor interactions, chromosomal, cell cycle, and DNA replication processes, while FAM64A mRNA expression was positively related to Th2 cell infiltration but negatively correlated with neutrophil and Th17 cell infiltration in four gynecological cancers. Whatthe implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? In the future, abnormal FAM64A mRNA expression may serve as a biomarker of carcinogenesis, histogenesis, aggressiveness, and prognosis in gynecological malignancies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BTG4 arrests the cell cycle and suppresses oocyte and embryonic development. We performed a bioinformatic analysis of BTG4 expression. BTG4 expression was downregulated in breast cancer compared with normal tissues (p <.05), but the opposite was observed in cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancers (p <.05). BTG4 methylation was negatively correlated with its mRNA expression in breast, cervical and endometrial cancers (p <.05). BTG4 mRNA expression was negatively correlated with T staging and distant metastasis of breast cancer; and with tumor invasion, clinical stage, low weight and BMI, low histological grade and no diabetes in endometrial cancer but positively with T stage and non-keratinizing squamous carcinoma in endometrial cancer. BTG4 expression was negatively correlated with the survival of ovarian cancer patients (p <.05), but positively for breast, cervical and endometrial cancers (p <.05). BTG4 expression is thus a potential marker reflecting the carcinogenesis, aggressiveness and prognosis in gynecological cancers. What is already known on this subject? Previous studies have revealed the structure and location of BTG4. BTG4 inhibit cell proliferative, promote apoptosis, induce G1 cell cycle arrest. BTG4 promotes the development of mouse embryos from cell stage 1 to 2. The methylation and biological function of BTG4 were clarified in gastric and/or colorectal cancer cells. What do the results of this study add? BTG4 is found to closely link to reflect the carcinogenesis, histogenesis, aggressive behaviors and prognosis of gynecological cancers, and involved in ligand-receptor interaction, microtubule motor activity, dynein light chain binding, cilium organization, assembly, and movement in endometrial and ovarian cancers. What are the implications of these finding for clinical practice and/or further research? Aberrant BTG4 mRNA expression can be employed as a marker of the tumorigenesis, histogenesis, aggressiveness and prognosis of gynecological cancers in the future practice and guide the investigation of BTG4-related signal pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To clarify the clinicopathological importance of REG4 mRNA expression, we used GEO, TCGA, xiantao, UALCAN, and Kaplan-Meier plotter for a bioinformatics analysis in breast, cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancers. Compared to normal tissues, REG4 expression was found to be upregulated in breast, cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers (p < 0.05). Breast cancer had a higher level of REG4 methylation than normal tissues (p < 0.05), which was negatively correlated with its mRNA expression. REG4 expression was positively correlated with oestrogen and progesterone receptor expression, and aggressiveness of PAM50 classification of breast cancer patients (p < 0.05). Breast infiltrating lobular carcinomas expressed more REG4 than ductal carcinomas (p < 0.05). The REG4-related signal pathways mainly included peptidase, keratinisation, brush border and digestion and so forth in gynecological cancers. Our results indicated that REG4 overexpression was associated with gynecological carcinogenesis and their histogenesis, and may be used as a marker for aggressive behaviour and prognosis of breast or cervical cancer. What is already known on this subject? REG4 encodes a secretory c-type lectin and plays an essential role in inflammation, carcinogenesis, apoptotic and radiochemotherapeutic resistance. What do the results of this study add? As a standalone predictor, REG4 expression was positively correlated with progression-free survival. Expression of REG4 mRNA was positively associated with the T stage and adenosquamous cell carcinoma of cervical cancer. The top signal pathways related to REG4 included smell and chemical stimulus, peptidase, intermediate filament, and keratinisation in breast cancer; ligand-receptor interaction, metabolism of hormone, xenobiotic and retinol, peptidase, brush border and digestion in cervical and ovarian cancers; bile secretion, intermediate filament, chemical carcinogenesis, brush border and keratinisation in endometrial cancer. REG4 mRNA expression was positively correlated with DC cell infiltration in breast cancer, positively with Th17 cells, TFH, cytotoxic cells and T cells in cervical and endometrial cancers, and negatively with DC cell infiltration, cytotoxic cells and T cells in ovarian cancer. The top hub genes mainly included small proline rich protein 2B in breast cancer; fibrinogens and apoproteins in cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancers. What are the implications of these finding for clinical practice and/or further research? Our study has showed that REG4 mRNA expression is a potential biomarker or therapeutic target for gynaecologic cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BAG3 is a co-chaperone BAG family protein that plays important roles in protein homeostasis, cell survival, cell motility, and tumour metastasis. This study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological and prognostic implications of BAG3 mRNA expression in tumours. We performed bioinformatics analysis on BAG3 mRNA expression using TCGA, XIANTAO, UALCAN, and Kaplan-Meier plotter databases. BAG3 mRNA expression was downregulated in breast and endometrial cancers and positively correlated with favourable PAM50 subtyping in breast cancer，clinical stage and short overall survival in ovarian cancer and negatively correlated with T stage, clinical stage, and histological grade in cervical and endometrial cancers. The top BAG3-related pathways included ligand-receptor interactions and activity, DNA packaging and nucleosomes, hormonal responses, membrane regions, microdomains and rafts, and endosomes in breast cancer; ligand-receptor interactions, transmembrane transporters and channels, cell adhesion, and keratinisation in cervical cancer; ligand-receptor interactions, anion transmembrane transporters, lipoproteins, keratinisation, cell adhesion, and protein processing in endometrial cancer; metabolism of porphyrin, chlorophyll, pentose, uronic acid, ascorbate, and alternate and cell adhesion in ovarian cancer. BAG3 expression could represent a potential marker for carcinogenesis, histogenesis, aggressive behaviours, and prognosis in gynecological cancers. What is already known on this subject? BAG3 regulates cell activity, autophagy, and resistance to apoptosis through multiple domains and plays an important role in tumour development. BAG3 positively regulates tumour cell invasion and migration in cervical and ovarian cancers. What do the results of this study add? BAG3 expression is closely associated with histogenesis, clinicopathology, and prognosis in gynecological cancers and is involved in signalling pathways associated with the control of cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and drug resistance in tumours. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Abnormal BAG3 expression can be employed as a possible marker of tumour development, invasion, and prognosis, providing new ideas for treating cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]