Search

Background: Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery has become a popular research topic over the past decade. However, no published studies have provided a systematic overview for this field. A bibliometric analysis is urgently required to characterise current international trends and provide an intuitive description of past and emerging trends. Methods: This study analysed minimally invasive glaucoma surgery-related studies by searching the Web of Science for relevant articles published between 1992 and 2023. All the retrieved titles and abstracts were screened for eligibility, and only articles and reviews written in English were included in the analysis. CiteSpace (version 6.1.6), VOSviewer (version 1.6.19), and the bibliometric package in RStudio were used to construct and visualise the results. Results: A total of 1533 publications were included in the analysis with 26072 citations. A total of 4482 authors from 1191 organizations in 57 countries and regions published papers in 139 journals. After 2010, the number of publications increased significantly, with the highest annual productivity occurring in 2022 (n = 229, 15 %). Most of these studies were published in ophthalmology journals. The journal “Ophthalmology” ranked first with 30 papers and 5275 citations. Among the 10 most productive countries, the United States had the largest share of publications (n = 423, 36 %) and Switzerland had the highest proportion of multiple-country publications (70 %). Neodymium was the first keyword discovered, appearing in 1992 and continuing for 21 years. Kahook dual-blade, progression, gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy, efficacy, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, cataract extraction, and primary open-angle glaucoma were the most recent keywords since 2020. Conclusions: This was the first bibliometric analysis of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery and provides an overview of the developments in this field. Our results identified outstanding studies, countries, institutions, journals, and authors in the field to point the way forward for scientific research and clinical applications of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery.

Objective An increasing number of studies have explored the clinical effects of antiglaucoma surgical procedures; however, economic evidence was scarce. We aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness between maximal medical treatment (MMT) and commonly used surgical procedures (trabeculectomy, Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation, gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy and ab interno canaloplasty).Design and setting A Markov model study.Participants A hypothetical cohort of 100 000 patients with mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).Outcomes Data were obtained from public sources. The main outcomes were incremental cost–utility ratios (ICURs) using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to verify the robustness and sensitivity of base-case results.Main results Both cumulative costs and QALYs gained from surgical procedures (US$6045–US$13 598, 3.33–6.05 QALYs) were higher than those from MMT (US$3117–US$6458, 3.14–5.66 QALYs). Compared with MMT, all surgical procedures satisfied the cost-effectiveness threshold (lower than US$30 501 and US$41 568 per QALY gained in rural and urban settings, respectively). During the 5-year period, trabeculectomy produced the lowest ICUR (US$21 462 and US$15 242 per QALY gained in rural and urban settings, respectively). During the 10-year-follow-up, trabeculectomy still produced the lowest ICUR (US$13 379 per QALY gained) in urban setting; however, gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (US$19 619 per QALY gained) and ab interno canaloplasty (US$18 003 per QALY gained) produced lower ICURs than trabeculectomy (US$19 675 per QALY gained) in rural areas. Base-case results were most sensitive to the utilities and costs of initial treatment and maintenance.Conclusions The long-term cost-effectiveness of commonly used surgical procedures could be better than the short-term cost-effectiveness for mild-to-moderate POAG patients in China. Health economic studies, supported by more rigorous structured real-world data, are needed to assess their everyday cost-effectiveness.

Summary: Background: Children and adolescents’ myopia is a major public problem. Although the clinical effect of various interventions has been extensively studied, there is a lack of national-level and integral assessments to simultaneously quantify the economics and effectiveness of comprehensive myopia prevention and control programs. We aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness between traditional myopia prevention and control strategy, digital comprehensive myopia prevention and control strategy and school-based myopia screening program in China. Methods: A Markov model was used to compare the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness among school-based myopia screening, traditional myopia prevention and control strategy, and digital comprehensive myopia prevention and control strategy among 6 to 18-year-old rural and urban schoolchildren. Parameters were collected from published sources. The primary outcomes were quality-adjusted life-year, disability-adjusted life-year, incremental cost-utility ratio, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness and sensitivity of base-case analysis. Findings: Compared with school-based myopia screening strategy, after implementing digital comprehensive myopia prevention and control strategy, the prevalence of myopia among 18-year-old students in rural and urban areas was reduced by 3.79% and 3.48%, respectively. The incremental cost-utility ratio per quality-adjusted life-year gained with the digital myopia management plan ($11,301 for rural setting, and $10,707 for urban setting) was less than 3 times the per capita gross domestic product in rural settings ($30,501) and less than 1 time the per capita gross domestic product in urban settings ($13,856). In cost-effectiveness analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio produced by digital comprehensive myopia management strategy ($37,446 and $41,814 per disability-adjusted life-year averted in rural and urban settings) slightly exceeded the cost-effectiveness threshold. When assuming perfect compliance, full coverage of outdoor activities and spectacles satisfied the cost-effectiveness threshold, and full coverage of outdoor activities produced the lowest cost ($321 for rural settings and $808 for urban settings). Interpretations: Health economic evidence confirmed the cost-effectiveness of promoting digital comprehensive myopia prevention and control strategies for schoolchildren at the national level. Sufficient evidence provides an economic and public health reference for further action by governments, policy-makers and other myopia-endemic countries. Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China, NSFC (82171051), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (JQ20029), Capital Health Research and Development of Special (2020-2-1081), National Natural Science Foundation of China, NSFC (82071000), National Natural Science Foundation of China, NSFC (8197030562).