Search

Your search keyword '"Zhe-Bin Yan"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Author "Zhe-Bin Yan"
3 results on '"Zhe-Bin Yan"'

1. Do Temporomandibular Disorder Patients with Joint Pain Exhibit Forward Head Posture? A Cephalometric Study

Author

Chu-Qiao Xiao, Yi-Dan Wan, Ya-Qi Li, Zhe-Bin Yan, Qiao-Yu Cheng, Pei-Di Fan, Yi Huang, Xiao-Yi Wang, and Xin Xiong

Subjects
Medicine (General), R5-920
Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate head and cervical posture in individuals with or without temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and to assess the correlations between pain, severity of symptoms, and posture. Methods. A total of 384 patients (129 males and 255 females) was included. The Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI) was used to assess the severity and prevalence of TMD and the presence of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain. Patients were divided into three groups: the TMD-free group, TMD without TMJ pain group, and TMD with TMJ pain group. Subsequently, the patients with TMJ pain were further divided into mild TMD and moderate/severe TMD groups. Nine parameters were traced on cephalograms to characterize the head and cervical posture. Results. TMD patients with TMJ pain showed increased forward head posture (FHP) than patients without TMJ pain and TMD-free subjects. No significant difference was observed between the TMD patients without TMJ pain and TMD-free subjects. In the TMD patients with the TMJ pain group, the moderate/severe TMD patients demonstrated increased FHP compared to mild TMD patients. TMD patients with joint pain had greater CVT/RL (B = 3.099), OPT/RL (B = 2.117), and NSL/C2’ (B = 4.646) than the patients without joint pain after adjusting for confounding variables (P

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Craniofacial Morphology of Orthodontic Patients with and without Temporomandibular Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Zhe-Bin Yan, Yi-Dan Wan, Chu-Qiao Xiao, Ya-Qi Li, Yu-Yao Zhang, Yang An, and Xin Xiong

Subjects
Medicine (General), R5-920
Abstract

Purpose. We aimed to explore the relationship between temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and craniofacial morphology in orthodontic patients. Methods. Altogether, 262 orthodontic patients were included and divided into two groups according to their Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI) scores: a no-TMD group (control group, FAI

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Do Specific Craniomaxillofacial Features Correlate with Psychological Distress in Adult Pretreatment Orthodontic Patients? A Cephalometric Study

Author

Chu-Qiao Xiao, Yi-Dan Wan, Zhe-Bin Yan, Ya-Qi Li, Pei-Di Fan, Qiao-Yu Cheng, and Xin Xiong

Subjects
Adult, Male, Article Subject, Cephalometry, Biochemistry (medical), Clinical Biochemistry, Open Bite, General Medicine, Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Psychological Distress, Overbite, Genetics, Humans, Female, Molecular Biology
Abstract

Purpose. To explore the relationship between craniomaxillofacial features and psychological distress among adult pretreatment orthodontic patients. Methods. A group of 190 patients (95 males and 95 females) was included. Questionnaires including the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10) were sent to patients, and cephalograms were collected. Patients were divided into two groups according to K10 score: psychological distress group ( score ≥ 20 ) and no psychological distress group ( score < 20 ). Nineteen hard tissue and thirteen soft tissue parameters were traced on cephalograms to characterize the craniomaxillofacial features. Results. There was no significant difference in gender or age distribution between the two groups. Male patients with psychological distress showed statistically significantly larger anterior facial height (AFH) (126.62 mm vs. 120.97 mm), upper lip length (25.11 mm vs. 23.26 mm), and smaller overbite (1.21 mm vs. 2.75 mm) than patients without psychological distress. Male patients with hyperdivergent pattern and open bite were more likely to have psychological distress. None of the parameters showed statistical differences across groups in females. Frankfort-mandibular plane angle ( r = 0.235 ), Bjork’s sum ( r = 0.311 ), AFH ( r = 0.322 ), overbite ( r = − 0.238 ), AFH/posterior facial height ( r = 0.251 ), and upper anterior facial height (UAFH)/lower anterior facial height (LAFH) ( r = − 0.230 ) were correlated with K10 score in males. After adjusting gender and age, the AFH ( B = 0.147 ) and UAFH/LAFH ( B = − 14.923 ) were significantly related with the K10 score. Conclusion. Psychological distress was mainly correlated with hyperdivergent pattern, open bite, and larger lower anterior facial height proportion in pretreatment orthodontic patients. Orthodontists should be aware of the possible underlying psychological distress in patients with specific craniomaxillofacial features. Clinical assessment of psychological distress may need to take into account gender differences in patients.

Published
2022

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results