Search

Abstract Sustainable multi-story building designs are gaining increasing attention in light of the green development of the building industry. Recently, many studies have been conducted to determine the optimized embodied energy considering size of structural members and materials strength using a single objective function. In this context, the current study adopted a multi-objective function based on cost and Embodied Energy (EE) for the sustainable design of the entire multi-story building. A BuildingEnergy computer program is used to assess the energy consumption performance of a multi-story reinforcement cement concrete building. Based on the proposed method, an analysis is carried out to compare the optimal solutions for multi-story building. Furthermore, a detailed parametric study was conducted to explore the main factors for energy-efficient column and beam design. The results revealed that with a comparison of the most “carbon-friendly” and “cost-friendly” solutions, an added cost of 6–7% can contribute up to a 13% emission reduction. The sectional dimensions, steel rebar, concrete strengths, cost ratio, building height, and eccentricity remarkably influence sustainable design, cost optimization, and minimum carbon emission. Overall, this study could help to define cost-effective and energy-efficient structural members. Eventually, the EE is confirmed to be a feasible parameter for designing more sustainable multi-story RCC buildings.

Abstract Low computational efficiency and non-linearity behaviour make the simulation of the overall building structure problematic to attain with a single dynamic or static method. Thus, this paper uses a plastic deformation (PD) method based on concrete plasticity theory (CPT) for comparative analysis of multi-storey reinforcement cement concrete (RCC) and composite buildings under common and rare earthquake loads. For this purpose, a 15-storey tall building was selected for analysis using ABAQUS software. At first, a possible building model was created and then plastic deformation analysis was performed using the new PD method under both common and rare earthquakes. After that, a nonlinear time history analysis was conducted, and the results of plastic strain distribution, lateral displacement, peak acceleration, storey stiffness, shear force, storey drift, normalised shear, and top deflection of the RCC and composite buildings were studied deeply. The fundamental time period of the RCC model was found to be 5.2 s while the fundamental time period of the composite model was 6 s. Under common and rare earthquake leads, the peak acceleration of the RCC building was 19% and 22% higher than composite buildings, respectively. Under common and rare seismic loads, the top deflections of the composite building were 33% and 36% higher than those of RCC buildings, respectively. In the case of the RCC building, it was found in this study that higher peak acceleration (PA) of the ground motion led to higher storey top displacement, storey drift, shear force and top deflection under both ground motions. Numerical results suggested that the use of composite structure is more durable than RCC structure. It was also concluded that the PD method could also be effectively used for the analysis of RCC and composite buildings under dynamic loads.

Background: Extraskeletal osteosarcoma (ESOS) is a rare kind of sarcoma with a low preoperative diagnosis and a poor prognosis. ESOS arising from abdominal mesentery is extremely rare. Increasing diagnostic methods and standardizing treatment protocols are crucial issues of ESOS. Case presentation: We report the case of a 52-year-old female ESOS patient. She had a history of ovarian carcinoma (stage IIIC) surgery two years before, with five cycles of chemotherapy. A mass was found during postoperative examinations. A R0 surgical resection was performed. Post-operational pathological report plus intra-surgery findings supported a diagnosis of ESOS. She is still alive 10 months post-operationally, with routine blood and radiographical examinations. Conclusion: Enhancing awareness of this extremely rare disease together with advancements in diagnostic methods will hopefully enable earlier recognition and initiation of treatment. Protocols for standardizing treatments require a larger multi-center collaboration and more data analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The fourth edition of the latest classification principles for endocrine tumors was published by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2017. The latest tumor classification and new pathological classification of each pituitary gland tumor were given in detail. In May 2021, International Classification of Disease⁃11 (ICD⁃11) was updated and the independent additional code of each type of tumor was enriched. Non⁃neuroendocrine tumors, including craniopharyngioma, neuronal and paraneuronal tumors, tumors of posterior pituitary, mesenchymal and stromal tumors, hematolymphoid tumors, germ cell tumors, and secondary tumors in the pituitary gland are described. The corresponding disease codes and morphological codes are listed in combination with ICD⁃10, ICD⁃11 and ICD⁃O. Detailed additional codes for each tumor are listed according to ICD⁃11.

Copyright of Rare Metals is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)