Search

Your search keyword '"Zganjar, Chris"' showing total 16 results
Start Over Author "Zganjar, Chris"
16 results on '"Zganjar, Chris"'

1. Assessing evidence on the impacts of nature-based interventions for climate change mitigation: a systematic map of primary and secondary research from subtropical and tropical terrestrial regions

Author

Cheng, Samantha H., Costedoat, Sebastien, Sigouin, Amanda, Calistro, Gabriel F., Chamberlain, Catherine J., Lichtenthal, Peter, Mills, Morena, Nowakowski, A. Justin, Sterling, Eleanor J., Tinsman, Jen, Wiggins, Meredith, Brancalion, Pedro H. S., Canty, Steven W. J., Fritts-Penniman, Allison, Jagadish, Arundhati, Jones, Kelly, Mascia, Michael B., Porzecanski, Ana, Zganjar, Chris, and Brenes, Carlos L. Muñoz

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Co‐benefits of and trade‐offs between natural climate solutions and Sustainable Development Goals.

Author

Mariani, Gaël, Moullec, Fabien, Atwood, Trisha B, Clarkson, Beverley, Conant, Richard T, Cullen‐Unsworth, Leanne, Griscom, Bronson, Gutt, Julian, Howard, Jennifer, Krause‐Jensen, Dorte, Leavitt, Sara M, Lee, Shing Yip, Livesley, Stephen J, Macreadie, Peter I, St‐John, Michael, Zganjar, Chris, Cheung, William WL, Duarte, Carlos M, Shin, Yunne‐Jai, and Singh, Gerald G

Subjects
SUSTAINABLE development, BEST practices, ECOSYSTEMS, ACHIEVEMENT, HUMANITY
Abstract

Combating climate change and achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are two important challenges facing humanity. Natural climate solutions (NCSs) can contribute to the achievement of these two commitments but can also generate conflicting trade‐offs. Here, we reviewed the literature and drew on expert knowledge to assess the co‐benefits of and trade‐offs between 150 SDG targets and NCSs within 12 selected ecosystems. We demonstrate that terrestrial, coastal, and marine NCSs enable the attainment of different sets of SDG targets, with low redundancy. Implementing NCSs in various ecosystems would therefore maximize achievement of SDG targets but would also induce trade‐offs, particularly if best practices are not followed. Reliance on NCSs at large scales will require that these trade‐offs be taken into consideration to ensure the simultaneous realization of positive climate outcomes and multiple SDG targets for diverse stakeholders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Harnessing Big Data to Support the Conservation and Rehabilitation of Mangrove Forests Globally

Author

Worthington, Thomas A., Andradi-Brown, Dominic A., Bhargava, Radhika, Buelow, Christina, Bunting, Pete, Duncan, Clare, Fatoyinbo, Lola, Friess, Daniel A., Goldberg, Liza, Hilarides, Lammert, Lagomasino, David, Landis, Emily, Longley-Wood, Kate, Lovelock, Catherine E., Murray, Nicholas J., Narayan, Siddharth, Rosenqvist, Ake, Sievers, Michael, Simard, Marc, Thomas, Nathan, van Eijk, Pieter, Zganjar, Chris, and Spalding, Mark

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Natural climate solutions

Author

Griscom, Bronson W., Adams, Justin, Ellis, Peter W., Houghton, Richard A., Lomax, Guy, Miteva, Daniela A., Schlesinger, William H., Shoch, David, Siikamäki, Juha V., Smith, Pete, Woodbury, Peter, Zganjar, Chris, Blackman, Allen, Campari, João, Conant, Richard T., Delgado, Christopher, Elias, Patricia, Gopalakrishna, Trisha, Hamsik, Marisa R., Herrero, Mario, Kiesecker, Joseph, Landis, Emily, Laestadius, Lars, Leavitt, Sara M., Minnemeyer, Susan, Polasky, Stephen, Potapov, Peter, Putz, Francis E., Sanderman, Jonathan, Silvius, Marcel, Wollenberg, Eva, and Fargione, Joseph

Published
2017

9. Natural climate solutions for the United States

Author

Fargione, Joseph E., Bassett, Steven, Boucher, Timothy, Bridgham, Scott D., Conant, Richard T., Cook-Patton, Susan C., Ellis, Peter W., Falcucci, Alessandra, Fourqurean, James W., Gopalakrishna, Trisha, Gu, Huan, Henderson, Benjamin, Hurteau, Matthew D., Kroeger, Kevin D., Kroeger, Timm, Lark, Tyler J., Leavitt, Sara M., Lomax, Guy, McDonald, Robert I., Megonigal, J. Patrick, Miteva, Daniela A., Richardson, Curtis J., Sanderman, Jonathan, Shoch, David, Spawn, Seth A., Veldman, Joseph W., Williams, Christopher A., Woodbury, Peter B., Zganjar, Chris, Baranski, Marci, Elias, Patricia, Houghton, Richard A., Landis, Emily, McGlynn, Emily, Schlesinger, William H., Siikamaki, Juha V., Sutton-Grier, Ariana E., Griscom, Bronson W., Fargione, Joseph E., Bassett, Steven, Boucher, Timothy, Bridgham, Scott D., Conant, Richard T., Cook-Patton, Susan C., Ellis, Peter W., Falcucci, Alessandra, Fourqurean, James W., Gopalakrishna, Trisha, Gu, Huan, Henderson, Benjamin, Hurteau, Matthew D., Kroeger, Kevin D., Kroeger, Timm, Lark, Tyler J., Leavitt, Sara M., Lomax, Guy, McDonald, Robert I., Megonigal, J. Patrick, Miteva, Daniela A., Richardson, Curtis J., Sanderman, Jonathan, Shoch, David, Spawn, Seth A., Veldman, Joseph W., Williams, Christopher A., Woodbury, Peter B., Zganjar, Chris, Baranski, Marci, Elias, Patricia, Houghton, Richard A., Landis, Emily, McGlynn, Emily, Schlesinger, William H., Siikamaki, Juha V., Sutton-Grier, Ariana E., and Griscom, Bronson W.

Abstract

© The Author(s), 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Science Advances 4 (2018): eaat1869, doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat1869., Limiting climate warming to <2°C requires increased mitigation efforts, including land stewardship, whose potential in the United States is poorly understood. We quantified the potential of natural climate solutions (NCS)—21 conservation, restoration, and improved land management interventions on natural and agricultural lands—to increase carbon storage and avoid greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. We found a maximum potential of 1.2 (0.9 to 1.6) Pg CO2e year−1, the equivalent of 21% of current net annual emissions of the United States. At current carbon market prices (USD 10 per Mg CO2e), 299 Tg CO2e year−1 could be achieved. NCS would also provide air and water filtration, flood control, soil health, wildlife habitat, and climate resilience benefits., This study was made possible by funding from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation. C.A.W. and H.G. acknowledge financial support from NASA’s Carbon Monitoring System program (NNH14ZDA001N-CMS) under award NNX14AR39G. S.D.B. acknowledges support from the DOE’s Office of Biological and Environmental Research Program under the award DE-SC0014416. J.W.F. acknowledges financial support from the Florida Coastal Everglades Long-Term Ecological Research program under National Science Foundation grant no. DEB-1237517.

Published
2018

10. Natural climate solutions for the United States

Author

Fargione, Joseph E., primary, Bassett, Steven, additional, Boucher, Timothy, additional, Bridgham, Scott D., additional, Conant, Richard T., additional, Cook-Patton, Susan C., additional, Ellis, Peter W., additional, Falcucci, Alessandra, additional, Fourqurean, James W., additional, Gopalakrishna, Trisha, additional, Gu, Huan, additional, Henderson, Benjamin, additional, Hurteau, Matthew D., additional, Kroeger, Kevin D., additional, Kroeger, Timm, additional, Lark, Tyler J., additional, Leavitt, Sara M., additional, Lomax, Guy, additional, McDonald, Robert I., additional, Megonigal, J. Patrick, additional, Miteva, Daniela A., additional, Richardson, Curtis J., additional, Sanderman, Jonathan, additional, Shoch, David, additional, Spawn, Seth A., additional, Veldman, Joseph W., additional, Williams, Christopher A., additional, Woodbury, Peter B., additional, Zganjar, Chris, additional, Baranski, Marci, additional, Elias, Patricia, additional, Houghton, Richard A., additional, Landis, Emily, additional, McGlynn, Emily, additional, Schlesinger, William H., additional, Siikamaki, Juha V., additional, Sutton-Grier, Ariana E., additional, and Griscom, Bronson W., additional

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

14. Mapping environments at risk under different global climate change scenarios.

Author

Saxon, Earl, Baker, Barry, Hargrove, William, Hoffman, Forrest, and Zganjar, Chris

Subjects
BIODIVERSITY, CLIMATE change, MULTIVARIATE analysis, CONSERVATION biology, ECOLOGY
Abstract

All global circulation models based on Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scenarios project profound changes, but there is no consensus on how to map their environmental consequences. Our multivariate representation of environmental space combines stable topographic and edaphic attributes with dynamic climatic attributes. We divide that environmental space into 500 unique domains and map their current locations and their projected locations in 2100 under contrasting emissions scenarios. The environmental domains found across half the study area today disappear under the higher emissions scenario, but persist somewhere in it under the lower emissions scenario. Locations affected least and those affected most under each scenario are mapped. This provides an explicit framework for designing conservation networks to include both areas at least risk (potential refugia) and areas at greatest risk, where novel communities may form and where sentinel ecosystems can be monitored for signs of stress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2005
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results