1. Making wrong site surgery a "never event" in spinal deformity surgery by use of a "landmark vertebra" to eliminate variability in identifying a target vertebral level.
- Author
-
Givens RR, Malka MS, Lu K, Mizerik A, Bainton N, Zervos TM, Roye BD, Lenke LG, and Vitale MG
- Abstract
Purpose: Despite the introduction of "standardized counting" methods, errors in counting spinal levels and subsequent wrong-level surgery (WLS) remain critically important patient safety concerns. Previous work by our group has documented inconsistency in the identification of T12 despite the use of these systems including the Spinal Deformity Study Group (SDSG) conventions. To assist with consistent and repeatable identification of proposed preoperative surgical levels, the current study investigates a new strategy: utilization of a "landmark vertebra". It was hypothesized that individuals using a "landmark vertebra" strategy will achieve high concordance with target level identification between distinct time points as compared to conventional methods defining T12., Methods: Survey participants analyzed 99 pre-op radiographs, identifying and naming a "landmark vertebra" with concise descriptions like "last bilaterally ribbed vertebra." They then noted the proposed lowest instrumented vertebra's (LIV) distance relative to landmark (i.e., one below landmark). After a waiting period, participants used their written descriptions of the landmark and distance to LIV to reidentify these vertebrae. Cohen's Kappa (k) was used to measure intra-rater agreeability. The landmark strategy was compared to our previous work evaluating consistency in defining T12 based on the SDSG system., Results: All raters showed perfect to near-perfect agreement when re-identifying the landmark and target vertebrae (k = 0.819-1.00; Table 1A). Raters at all training levels had higher agreeability in naming the landmark vertebra and target when compared to raters at similar training levels defining T12 (k = 0.34-0.91; Table 1B). This high agreement across training demonstrates the strategy's versatility and generalizability., Conclusion: Utilization of a landmark strategy proved to be highly effective in reducing intra-rater variability, with perfect to near-perfect agreement among all raters and consistently higher agreeability when compared to defining T12., Level of Evidence: Level II-prospective survey., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: RRG has no conflicts of interest to disclose. MSM has no conflicts of interest to disclose. KL has no conflicts of interest to disclose. AM has no conflicts of interest to disclose. NB has no conflicts of interest to disclose. TMZ has no conflicts of interest to disclose. BDR has received grants from the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, Scoliosis Research Society, and Orthopedic Science Research Foundation. LGL has received royalties from Medtronic and Acuity Surgical and is a consultant for Medtronic and Acuity Surgical. He has received grants from the Setting Scoliosis Straight (SSS) Foundation, International Spine Study Group (ISSG) Foundation, and AOSpine. LGL has served on the board of the National Spine Health Foundation (NSHF), Global Spine Outreach (GSO), and Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation (SSSF). He has also received funding/support from the Fox Family (Prospective Pediatric Spinal Deformity study), AOSpine, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) and BroadWater. MGV has received grants from the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, Orthopedic Science Research Foundation, Pediatric Spine Foundation, and Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation and royalties from Biomet. He is a paid consultant for Stryker, Biomet, and NuVasive. MGV is on the Board of Directors of Pediatric Spine Foundation, Pediatric Spine Study Group, and C4K. He is former president of Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America and is a Board Member, Chair Emeritus of the International Pediatric Orthopaedic Symposium. Ethical approval: This study was approved by the Columbia University Institutional Review Board under protocol AAAU3144. It was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Consent for publication: No patient identifying information is included in the article. Not applicable., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF