Search

Objective: To present 1 year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of the randomized DIRECT (Pre-dilatation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Trial) trial., Background: Intermediate-term data from randomized studies investigating the safety and efficacy of direct implantation are lacking., Methods: DIRECT trial randomized 171 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis at four tertiary centers to undergo TAVI with the use of self-expanding prostheses with (pre-BAV) or without pre-dilatation (no-BAV). The primary endpoint was device success according to the VARC-2 criteria. All patients underwent a clinical and echocardiographic follow-up at 1 year. All-cause and cardiac mortality, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, and new pacemaker implantation were recorded., Results: At 1 year, four deaths were recorded in pre-BAV group (4.7%) and three deaths in no-BAV group (3.5%). There was no difference in Kaplan-Meier plots between the two groups in all-cause mortality at 1 year (log-rank p = .72). Similarly, there was no difference in the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation between the two groups at 1 year (27/67-40.3% in no-BAV group versus 20/69-29% in pre-BAV group, log-rank p = .24). There was no significant difference between pre-BAV and no BAV group in aortic valve area (1.84 ± 0.39 cm 2 vs. 1.85 ± 0.44 cm 2 , p = .90), mean aortic valve gradient (8.36 ± 5.04 vs. 8.00 ± 4.04 mmHg, p = .65) and moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation (5-6.6 vs. 4-5.7%, respectively) at 1 year. The same applied independently from the performance of post-dilatation at baseline., Conclusions: Direct, without pre-dilatation, implantation of a self-expanding valve has no impact on one-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes, independently also from the baseline performance of post-dilatation., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

There is limited organized "real life" data regarding the long-term structural and functional durability of transcatheter aortic valve implants, a topic of major importance. We assessed the 5-year structural and functional integrity outcomes following trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with both self-expandable and balloon-expandable prosthetic valve devices. This study included 450 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) between September 2008 and December 2011. Data were acquired from a multicenter Israeli registry and the median follow up time was 5.6 years. In 184 patients (40.9%) who survived 5 years, prostheses displayed sustained hemodynamic performance, with average peak and mean aortic valve gradients of 16.2 ± 8.9 and 9.2 ± 6.6 mm Hg, respectively. Late structural valve deterioration was found in 22 (12.3%) patients. Of these, 16 (8.9%) experienced valve deterioration and 6 (3.3%) experienced valve failure. Among the 6 patients with bioprosthetic valve failure, only 3 underwent re-interventions. Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction occurred more frequently in patients with small valves (23 mm) and high peak and mean transvalvular gradients at baseline. In conclusion, a relatively low rate of valve deterioration or failure was noted in our long-term follow-up study after TAVI procedures with both the catheter-based self-expandable and balloon-expandable prosthetic valves., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the implantation of a self-expanding valve with or without balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in an open-label, noninferiority, randomized trial., Background: There are no randomized studies comparing the implantation of a self-expanding valve with (pre-BAV) or without BAV., Methods: Consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis were randomly assigned to undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the use of self-expanding prostheses with (pre-BAV) or without (no-BAV) pre-dilatation. The primary endpoint was device success according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 criteria. Secondary endpoints included periprocedural mortality and stroke, new permanent pacemaker implantation, vascular complications, and 1-year mortality. The trial was scheduled to show noninferiority (Δ = 15%) of the direct versus the pre-BAV approach., Results: A total of 171 patients were randomized at 4 centers. Of these, 86 underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement with pre-dilatation and 85 without. Device success was noninferior in the no-BAV group compared with the pre-BAV group (65 of 85 [76.5%] for no-BAV vs. 64 of 86 [74.4%] for pre-BAV; mean difference 2.1%; 90% confidence interval: -8.9% to 13%). In the no-BAV group, 25 patients (29.4%) underwent post-balloon dilatation, and in the pre-BAV group, 13 patients (15.1%) underwent post-balloon dilatation (p = 0.03). Regarding major vascular complications and permanent pacemaker implantation, there was no difference between the 2 groups (log-rank p = 0.49, log-rank p = 0.54). In 1-month completed follow-up for all patients, there was 1 periprocedural stroke (0.5%), without any deaths., Conclusions: Direct, without balloon pre-dilatation, transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis system is noninferior to the pre-dilatation procedure. Lower post-dilatation rates were encountered in the group with pre-dilatation. (The Predilatation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Trial [DIRECT]; NCT02448927)., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Aortic stenosis is the most common significant valvular disease in the western world. These patients are treated operatively unless they are at high operative risk or inoperable. During the last decade an alternative approach has evolved - transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This method was shown to be at least as effective and safe as the operative one. However, very little data exists on long term follow-up (5 years and above), especially regarding valve durability and patient survival., Objectives: To present a long term follow-up on patients who underwent transcutaneous self-expandable aortic valve implantation in our department between the years 2008-2011., Methods: In September 2008 the first CoreValve implantation was performed in Israel at Hadassah Medical Center. All records of patients who were transplanted between 9.2008 and 10.2011 were reviewed. The function of the valve early after the procedure was compared to its function at the end of the follow-up period., Results: A total of 38 patients (out of 71) survived at least 54 months, of them, 19 have an echocardiography examination at the end of the follow-up period. In all patients the implanted valve was found to function well at the end of the follow-up period, without significant stenosis or paravalvular leak. In fact, in approximately half of these patients, the degree of paravalvular leak decreased during the follow-up period., Discussion: On long term (5 years) follow-up of patients who were implanted with the self-expandable aortic valve (CoreValve), no deterioration of the valve was observed. In fact, in approximately half of the patients, a decrease in the severity of the paravalvular leak was demonstrated.

Background: Acute myocarditis carries a variable prognosis. We evaluated the morbidity and mortality rates in patients with acute myocarditis and admission electrocardiographic predictors of outcome., Methods and Results: Patients admitted to a tertiary hospital with a clinical diagnosis of acute myocarditis were evaluated; 193 patients were included. Median follow-up was 5.7 years, 82% were male, and overal median age was 30 years (range 21-39). The most common clinical presentations were chest pain (77%) and fever (53%). The 30-day survival rate was 98.9%. Overall survival during follow-up was 94.3%. The most common abnormalities observed on electrocardiography were T-wave changes (36%) and ST-segment changes (32%). Less frequent changes included abnormal T-wave axis (>105° or < -15°; 16%), abnormal QRS axis (12%), QTc >460 ms (11%), and QRS interval ≥120 ms (5%). Wide QRS-T angle (≥100°) was demonstrated in 13% of the patients and was associated with an increased mortality rate compared with patients with a narrow QRS-T angle (20% vs 4%; P = .007). The rate of heart failure among patients with a wide QRS-T angle was significantly higher (36% vs 10%; P = .001). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that a wide QRS-T angle (≥100°) was a significant independent predictor of heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 3.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-7.59; P < .01) and of the combined end point of death or heart failure (HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.14-5.75; P < .05)., Conclusions: QRS-T angle is a predictor of increased morbidity and mortality in acute myocarditis., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)