Search

The overexpression of inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins is strongly related to poor survival of women with ovarian cancer. Recurrent ovarian cancers resist apoptosis due to the dysregulation of IAP proteins. Mechanistically, Second Mitochondrial Activator of Caspases (SMAC) mimetics suppress the functions of IAP proteins to restore apoptotic pathways resulting in tumor death. We previously conducted a phase 2 clinical trial of the single-agent SMAC mimetic birinapant and observed minimal drug response in women with recurrent ovarian cancer despite demonstrating on-target activity. Accordingly, we performed a high-throughput screening matrix to identify synergistic drug combinations with birinapant. SMAC mimetics in combination with an HDAC inhibitor showed remarkable synergy and was, therefore, selected for further evaluation. We show here that this synergy observed both in vitro and in vivo results from multiple convergent pathways to include increased caspase activation, HDAC inhibitor-mediated TNF-α upregulation, and alternative NF-kB signaling. These findings provide a rationale for the integration of SMAC mimetics and HDAC inhibitors in clinical trials for recurrent ovarian cancer where treatment options are still limited.

Opinion Statement: COVID-19 has transformed the care we provide to gynecologic oncology patients. In addition to directly impacting the diagnosis and treatment of women with gynecologic cancer, it has affected our patient's ability to undergo recommended surveillance and has made an impact on every caregiver providing care during this time. Herein we review the current literature on the impact of COVID-19 on gynecologic oncology and highlight new approaches and innovations that have resulted in gynecologic cancer care as a result of the pandemic. The impact of COVID-19 on the field of gynecologic oncology has been profound. In addition to directly impacting the diagnosis and treatment of women with cancer, it has also challenged the very ethics with which we practice medicine. The equitable distribution of resources is paramount to upholding the Hippocratic Oath which we all invoke. The COVID-19 pandemic has stripped this oath down to its very core, forcing all medical practitioners to scrutinize who gets what resources and when. As the pandemic continues to unfold, the question remains - in the setting of a strained and overburdened healthcare system, how do we maximize beneficence to one group of patients, while maintaining non-maleficence to others? As gynecologic oncologists, we are responsible for advocating for our patients to ensure that the quality of their cancer care is not compromised, while also not overutilizing resources that are sorely needed for the care of COVID-19 victims, and not making them more likely to succumb to COVID-19 by the very nature of the treatment we provide. The effects of the pandemic are far-reaching and broad, and many of these are yet to be determined. Future studies are needed to analyze how the above-utilized strategies in GYN cancer care during the pandemic will impact the long-term outcomes of our patients., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins are frequently upregulated in ovarian cancer, resulting in the evasion of apoptosis and enhanced cellular survival. Birinapant, a synthetic second mitochondrial activator of caspases (SMAC) mimetic, suppresses the functions of IAP proteins in order to enhance apoptotic pathways and facilitate tumor death. Despite on-target activity, however, pre-clinical trials of single-agent birinapant have exhibited minimal activity in the recurrent ovarian cancer setting. To augment the therapeutic potential of birinapant, we utilized a high-throughput screening matrix to identify synergistic drug combinations. Of those combinations identified, birinapant plus docetaxel was selected for further evaluation, given its remarkable synergy both in vitro and in vivo. We showed that this synergy results from multiple convergent pathways to include increased caspase activation, docetaxel-mediated TNF-α upregulation, alternative NF-kB signaling, and birinapant-induced microtubule stabilization. These findings provide a rationale for the integration of birinapant and docetaxel in a phase 2 clinical trial for recurrent ovarian cancer where treatment options are often limited and minimally effective.

Purpose: Despite high initial response rates with cytoreductive surgery, conventional chemotherapy and the incorporation of biologic agents, ovarian cancer patients often relapse and die from their disease. New approaches are needed to improve patient outcomes. This study was designed to evaluate the antitumor activity of NEO-201 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in preclinical models of ovarian cancer where the NEO-201 target is highly expressed. Experimental Design: Functional analysis of NEO-201 against tumor cell lines was performed by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) assays. Binding of NEO-201 to tumor tissues and cell lines were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and flow cytometry, respectively. Further characterization of the antigen recognized by NEO-201 was performed by mass spectrometry. Ovarian cancer models were used to evaluate the anti-tumor activity of NEO-201 in vivo . NEO-201 at a concentration of 250 g/mouse was injected intraperitoneally (IP) on days 1, 4, and 8. Human PBMCs were injected IP simultaneously as effector cells. Results: Both IHC and flow cytometry revealed that NEO-201 binds prominently to the colon, pancreatic, and mucinous ovarian cancer tissues and cell lines. Immunoprecipitation of the antigen recognized by NEO-201 was performed in human ovarian, colon, and pancreatic cancer cell lines. From these screening, carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 (CEACAM5) and CEACAM6 were identified as the most likely targets of NEO-201. Our results confirmed that NEO-201 binds different types of cancers; the binding is highly selective for the tumor cells without cross reactivity with the surrounding healthy tissue. Functional analysis revealed that NEO-201 mediates ADCC killing against human ovarian and colorectal carcinoma cell lines in vitro . In addition, NEO-201 inhibited tumor growth in the presence of activated human PBMCs in orthotopic mouse models of both primary and metastatic ovarian cancer. Importantly, NEO-201 prolonged survival of tumor-bearing mice. Conclusions: These data suggested that NEO-201 has an antitumor activity against tumor cells expressing its antigen. Targeting an antigen expressed in tumors, but not in normal tissues, allows patient selection for optimal treatment. These findings strongly indicate that NEO-201 warrants clinical testing as both a novel therapeutic and diagnostic agent for treatment of ovarian carcinomas. A first in human clinical trial evaluating NEO-201 in adults with chemo-resistant solid tumors is ongoing at the NIH clinical Center., (Copyright © 2020 Zeligs, Morelli, David, Neuman, Hernandez, Hewitt, Ozaki, Osei-Tutu, Anderson, Andresson, Das, Lack, Abdelmaksoud, Fantini, Arlen, Tsang and Annunziata.)

The NF-κB signaling pathway is a complex network linking extracellular stimuli to cell survival and proliferation. Cytoplasmic signaling to activate NF-κB can occur as part of the DNA damage response or in response to a large variety of activators, including viruses, inflammation, and cell death. NF-κB transcription factors play a fundamental role in tumorigenesis and are implicated in the origination and propagation of both hematologic and solid tumor types, including melanoma, breast, prostate, ovarian, pancreatic, colon, lung, and thyroid cancers. On the other hand, NF-κB signaling is key to immune function and is likely necessary for antitumor immunity. This presents a dilemma when designing therapeutic approaches to target NF-κB. There is growing interest in identifying novel modulators to inhibit NF-κB activity as impeding different steps of the NF-κB pathway has potential to slow tumor growth, progression, and resistance to chemotherapy. Despite significant advances in our understanding of this pathway, our ability to effectively clinically block key targets for cancer therapy remains limited due to on-target effects in normal tissues. Tumor specificity is critical to developing therapeutic strategies targeting this antiapoptotic signaling pathway to maintain antitumor immune surveillance when applying such therapy to patients. Clin Cancer Res; 22(17); 4302-8. ©2016 AACR., Competing Interests: of Potential Conflicts of Interest: No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed., (©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Objective: To evaluate the natural history of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) and to identify risk factors for invasive vaginal carcinoma., Methods: The records of all women with VAIN diagnosed at military treatment facilities over a 10-year period with minimum follow-up of 12 months were reviewed. Patient demographics and clinical information related to the diagnosis and treatment of VAIN were recorded., Results: One hundred twenty-seven women with VAIN met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 47.4 years, and median surveillance was 34 months (range 12-169 months). Seventy-five patients had low-grade vaginal dysplasia as their initial diagnosis, and 15 (20%) of these patients underwent treatment. Fifty-two patients had high-grade vaginal dysplasia, of which 38 (73%) underwent treatment. Overall, 113 patients (89%) demonstrated normalization of disease, 11 patients (9%) demonstrated persistence of disease, and three patients (2%) experienced recurrence of disease. No patients experienced development of invasive vaginal carcinoma. However, median time to normalization was 6 months longer in patients with low-grade dysplasia compared with those with high-grade dysplasia (15.9 months compared with 10.0 months; hazard ratio 1.5; 95% confidence interval 1.004-2.1; P=.045). Patients with high-grade dysplasia had more biopsies performed during their surveillance than patients with low-grade dysplasia (3.3 compared with 2.5; P=.045)., Conclusion: Overall, 89% of patients demonstrated normalization of VAIN, and none had progression to invasive cancer. Normalization, persistence, and recurrence rates did not significantly differ by grade of dysplasia or treatment status. Based on our findings regarding the time to normalization, annual surveillance with combined cytology and colposcopy is likely adequate. Because 11% of patients with VAIN either will experience recurrence or will have persistent disease, lifetime surveillance is recommended., Level of Evidence: : III.